Cart
Article
Source Apportionment of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in the Urban Atmosphere: A Comparison of Three Methods
Full Text HTML
Hi-Res PDFPurchase the full-text
- PDF/HTML,
figures/images,
references and tables,
(where available)
Section:Abstract
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are ubiquitous pollutants in urban atmospheres. Several PAHs are known carcinogens or are the precursors to carcinogenic daughter compounds. Understanding the contributions of the various emission sources is critical to appropriately managing PAH levels in the environment. The sources of PAHs to ambient air in Baltimore, MD, were determined by using three source apportionment methods, principal component analysis with multiple linear regression, UNMIX, and positive matrix factorization. Determining the source apportionment through multiple techniques mitigates weaknesses in individual methods and strengthens the overlapping conclusions. Overall source contributions compare well among methods. Vehicles, both diesel and gasoline, contribute on average 16−26%, coal 28−36%, oil 15−23%, and wood/other having the greatest disparity of 23−35% of the total (gas- plus particle-phase) PAHs. Seasonal trends were found for both coal and oil. Coal was the dominate PAH source during the summer while oil dominated during the winter. Positive matrix factorization was the only method to segregate diesel from gasoline sources. These methods indicate the number and relative strength of PAH sources to the ambient urban atmosphere. As with all source apportionment techniques, these methods require the user to objectively interpret the resulting source profiles.
Citing Articles
Citation data is made available by participants in CrossRef's Cited-by Linking service. For a more comprehensive list of citations to this article, users are encouraged to perform a search in SciFinder.
This article has been cited by 15 ACS Journal articles (5 most recent appear below).
Quantitative Source Apportionment of PAHs in Sediments of Little Menomonee River, Wisconsin: Weathered Creosote versus Urban Background
Scott A. Stout and Thomas P. GraanEnvironmental Science & Technology2010 44 (8), 2932-2939Quantitative Source Apportionment of PAHs in Sediments of Little Menomonee River, Wisconsin: Weathered Creosote versus Urban Background
Scott A. Stout and Thomas P. GraanEnvironmental Science & Technology2010 44 (8), 2932-2939Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in urban environments are often derived from point and nonpoint sources, the latter collectively considered as urban background. Quantifying the contributions of point sources and urban background is important for ...
Determination and Source Apportionment of Five Classes of Steroid Hormones in Urban Rivers
Hong Chang, Yi Wan and Jianying HuEnvironmental Science & Technology2009 43 (20), 7691-7698Determination and Source Apportionment of Five Classes of Steroid Hormones in Urban Rivers
Hong Chang, Yi Wan and Jianying HuEnvironmental Science & Technology2009 43 (20), 7691-7698We developed an original analytical method for monitoring five estrogens, nine androgens, nine progestogens, six glucocorticoids, and one mineralocorticoid in one water sample using liquid chromatography-electrospray tandem mass spectrometry, and then 45 ...
Seasonal and Daily Source Apportionment of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Concentrations in PM10 in a Semirural European Area
Barend L. van Drooge and Pascual Pérez BallestaEnvironmental Science & Technology2009 43 (19), 7310-7316Seasonal and Daily Source Apportionment of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Concentrations in PM10 in a Semirural European Area
Barend L. van Drooge and Pascual Pérez BallestaEnvironmental Science & Technology2009 43 (19), 7310-7316Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) were analyzed from ambient air particulate matter (PM10) that was collected near Lago Maggiore (Lombardy) in Northern Italy from August 2008 to January 2009. Highest individual PAH concentrations ranged from 0.05 ng/...
Removal and Fate of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Pollutants in an Urban Stormwater Bioretention Facility
Catherine J. DiBlasi, Houng Li, Allen P. Davis and Upal GhoshEnvironmental Science & Technology2009 43 (2), 494-502Removal and Fate of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Pollutants in an Urban Stormwater Bioretention Facility
Catherine J. DiBlasi, Houng Li, Allen P. Davis and Upal GhoshEnvironmental Science & Technology2009 43 (2), 494-502A bioretention cell removes 87% of the polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon load from urban stormwater and retains the contaminants in surficial deposits.
Source Apportionment of PAH in Hamilton Harbour Suspended Sediments: Comparison of Two Factor Analysis Methods
Uwayemi M. Sofowote, Brian E. McCarry and Christopher H. MarvinEnvironmental Science & Technology2008 42 (16), 6007-6014Source Apportionment of PAH in Hamilton Harbour Suspended Sediments: Comparison of Two Factor Analysis Methods
Uwayemi M. Sofowote, Brian E. McCarry and Christopher H. MarvinEnvironmental Science & Technology2008 42 (16), 6007-6014Two source apportionment methods (PCA-MLR and PMF) used to apportion the PAH burden in suspended sediment samples collected from Hamilton Harbour, Ontario are compared.
Tools
-
Add to Favorites
-
Download Citation
-
Email a Colleague -
Permalink
Order Reprints
Rights & Permissions
Citation Alerts
History
- Published In Issue May 01, 2003
- Received for review February 26, 2002
Revised manuscript received January 24, 2003
Accepted February 3, 2003
ACS
Network
Facebook
Tweet This
CiteULike
Newsvine
Digg This
Delicious
