Development and Application of Pyrolysis Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry for the Analysis of Bound Trinitrotoluene Residues in Soil

Jeffrey M. Weiss, Amanda J. McKay, Christopher DeRito, Chuichi Watanabe, Kevin A. Thorn,§ and Eugene L. Madsen*
Department of Microbiology, Wing Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, Frontier Laboratories, Ltd., 1-8-4, Saikon, Koriyama, Japan, and U.S. Geological Survey, P.O. Box 25046, Mail Stop 408, Denver Federal Center, Denver, Colorado 80225-0046
Environ. Sci. Technol., 2004, 38 (7), pp 2167–2174
DOI: 10.1021/es034911v
Publication Date (Web): March 3, 2004
Copyright © 2004 American Chemical Society

 Cornell University.

,

 Frontier Laboratories, Ltd.

,
§

 U.S. Geological Survey.

,
*

 Corresponding author e-mail:  elm3@cornell.edu; phone:  (607)255-2417; fax:  (607)255-3904.

Abstract

TNT (trinitrotoluene) is a contaminant of global environmental significance, yet determining its environmental fate has posed longstanding challenges. To date, only differential extraction-based approaches have been able to determine the presence of covalently bound, reduced forms of TNT in field soils. Here, we employed thermal elution, pyrolysis, and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) to distinguish between covalently bound and noncovalently bound reduced forms of TNT in soil. Model soil organic matter-based matrixes were used to develop an assay in which noncovalently bound (monomeric) aminodinitrotoluene (ADNT) and diaminonitrotoluene (DANT) were desorbed from the matrix and analyzed at a lower temperature than covalently bound forms of these same compounds. A thermal desorption technique, evolved gas analysis, was initially employed to differentiate between covalently bound and added 15N-labeled monomeric compounds. A refined thermal elution procedure, termed “double-shot analysis” (DSA), allowed a sample to be sequentially analyzed in two phases. In phase 1, all of an added 15N-labeled monomeric contaminant was eluted from the sample at relatively low temperature. In phase 2 during high-temperature pyrolysis, the remaining covalently bound contaminants were detected. DSA analysis of soil from the Louisiana Army Ammunition Plant (LAAP; 5000 ppm TNT) revealed the presence of DANT, ADNT, and TNT. After scrutinizing the DSA data and comparing them to results from solvent-extracted and base/acid-hydrolyzed LAAP soil, we concluded that the TNT was a noncovalently bound “carryover” from phase 1. Thus, the pyrolysis-GC/MS technique successfully defined covalently bound pools of ADNT and DANT in the field soil sample.

Tools

History

  • Published In Issue April 01, 2004
  • Received for review August 18, 2003
    Revised manuscript received January 20, 2004
    Accepted January 22, 2004

Recommend & Share