Spatial Variation of Streamwater Chemistry in Two Swedish Boreal Catchments:  Implications for Environmental Assessment

Johan Temnerud* and Kevin Bishop
Man-Technology-Environment Research Centre, Department of Natural Sciences, rebro University, rebro, Sweden, and Department of Environmental Assessment, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden
Environ. Sci. Technol., 2005, 39 (6), pp 1463–1469
DOI: 10.1021/es040045q
Publication Date (Web): January 22, 2005
Copyright © 2005 American Chemical Society
*

 Corresponding author phone:  +46−19−301065; fax:  +46−19−303169; e-mail:  Johan.Temnerud@nat.oru.se. Present address:  Man-Technology-Environment Research Centre, Örebro University, SE-70182 Örebro, Sweden.

,

 Örebro University.

,

 Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.

Abstract

To evaluate the scale-dependent spatial variability of water chemistry within two Swedish boreal catchments (subcatchment areas 0.01−78 km2), samples were taken at every junction in the stream network during June 2000 and August 2002. The values of most chemical constituents spanned more than an order of magnitude, and the range was similar to that found in all of Northern Sweden by the national stream survey in 2000. According to the official assessment tools used in Sweden, the entire range of environmental status (for pH, absorbance, alkalinity, dissolved organic carbon (DOC)) and human acidification influence existed within these two study catchments. The water chemistry parameters were relatively stable at catchment areas greater than 15 km2. Sampling at that scale may be adequate if generalized values for the landscape are desired. However the chemistry of headwaters, where much of the stream length and aquatic ecosystem is found would not be characterized. Map parameters correlated to the variability in a key chemical parameter, DOC, but the best predictive map parameters differed markedly between catchments. This study highlights the importance of accounting for headwater spatial variability in environmental assessments of running waters, even in relatively pristine areas. The nature of drainage networks with many headwaters and progressively fewer downstream watercourses makes this a considerable challenge.

Tools

History

  • Published In Issue March 15, 2005
  • Received for review April 8, 2004
    Revised manuscript received November 29, 2004
    Accepted December 1, 2004

Recommend & Share

Related Content

Other ACS content by these authors: