Transport of Chemical and Microbial Compounds from Known Wastewater Discharges:  Potential for Use as Indicators of Human Fecal Contamination

Susan T. Glassmeyer*
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, National Exposure Research Laboratory, 26 West Martin Luther King Drive, MS 564, Cincinnati, Ohio 45268
Edward T. Furlong
U.S. Geological Survey, National Water Quality Laboratory, P.O. Box 25046, MS 407, Denver Federal Center, Building 95, Denver, Colorado 80225
Dana W. Kolpin
U.S. Geological Survey, 400 S. Clinton Street, Room 269, Federal Building, Iowa City, Iowa 52244
Jeffery D. Cahill, Steven D. Zaugg, and Stephen L. Werner
U.S. Geological Survey, National Water Quality Laboratory, P.O. Box 25046, MS 407, Denver Federal Center, Building 95, Denver, Colorado 80225
Michael T. Meyer
U.S. Geological Survey, Organic Geochemistry Research Laboratory, 4821 Quail Crest Place, Lawrence, Kansas 66049
David D. Kryak
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, National Exposure Research Laboratory, D305-01, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711
Environ. Sci. Technol., 2005, 39 (14), pp 5157–5169
DOI: 10.1021/es048120k
Publication Date (Web): June 11, 2005
Copyright © 2005 American Chemical Society

Abstract

The quality of drinking and recreational water is currently (2005) determined using indicator bacteria. However, the culture tests used to analyze for these bacteria require a long time to complete and do not discriminate between human and animal fecal material sources. One complementary approach is to use chemicals found in human wastewater, which would have the advantages of (1) potentially shorter analysis times than the bacterial culture tests and (2) being selected for human-source specificity. At 10 locations, water samples were collected upstream and at two successive points downstream from a wastewaster treatment plant (WWTP); a treated effluent sample was also collected at each WWTP. This sampling plan was used to determine the persistence of a chemically diverse suite of emerging contaminants in streams. Samples were also collected at two reference locations assumed to have minimal human impacts. Of the 110 chemical analytes investigated in this project, 78 were detected at least once. The number of compounds in a given sample ranged from 3 at a reference location to 50 in a WWTP effluent sample. The total analyte load at each location varied from 0.018 μg/L at the reference location to 97.7 μg/L in a separate WWTP effluent sample. Although most of the compound concentrations were in the range of 0.01−1.0 μg/L, in some samples, individual concentrations were in the range of 5−38 μg/L. The concentrations of the majority of the chemicals present in the samples generally followed the expected trend:  they were either nonexistent or at trace levels in the upstream samples, had their maximum concentrations in the WWTP effluent samples, and then declined in the two downstream samples. This research suggests that selected chemicals are useful as tracers of human wastewater discharge.

Tools

SciFinder Links

SciFinder subscribers:  Click to sign in | Not a SciFinder subscriber? Learn more at www.cas.org

Explore by:


History

  • Published In Issue July 15, 2005
  • Received for review November 29, 2004
    Revised manuscript received April 19, 2005
    Accepted May 3, 2005

Recommend & Share

Related Content

Other ACS content by these authors: