Source and Health Implications of High Toxic Metal Concentrations in Illicit Tobacco Products

W. Edryd Stephens* and Angus Calder
School of Geography & Geosciences, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Fife KY16 9AL, Scotland, U.K.
Jason Newton
NERC Life Sciences Mass Spectrometry Facility, Scottish Universities Environmental Research Centre, East Kilbride, Glasgow G75 0QF, Scotland, U.K.
Environ. Sci. Technol., 2005, 39 (2), pp 479–488
DOI: 10.1021/es049038s
Publication Date (Web): December 14, 2004
Copyright © 2005 American Chemical Society
*

 Corresponding author telephone:  +44 1334 463947; fax:  +44 1334 463949; e-mail:  wes@st-and.ac.uk.

Abstract

A significant flux of heavy metals, among other toxins, reaches the lungs through smoking. Consequently, contaminated soil is usually avoided for tobacco cultivation. Here we compare the heavy metal concentrations in tobacco from a sample of 47 counterfeit products, representative of the substantial market for these products in the U.K., with their genuine equivalents and find significantly higher concentrations of heavy metals in the counterfeits. Trace element patterns suggest that over-application of fertilizers (phosphate and/or nitrate) is the most likely cause. Nitrogen isotopes showed no significant enrichment in 15N (δ15N range from +1.1 to +4.6‰ in counterfeits and from +2.5 to +3.3‰ in genuine tobaccos) as might be expected from a sewage or manure source of nitrate, and a mineral phosphate source is considered the more likely source of metals. Stable carbon isotopes in the same tobaccos have a wide range (δ13C −18.3 to −26.4‰), indicating the influence of multiple controls during cultivation and possibly post-harvesting. A review of the health effects of heavy metal transfer from tobacco via smoke to the lungs indicates that habitual smokers of counterfeits may be risking additional harm from high levels of cadmium and possibly other metals.

Tools

History

  • Published In Issue January 15, 2005
  • Received for review June 24, 2004
    Revised manuscript received October 4, 2004
    Accepted October 16, 2004

Recommend & Share

Related Content

Other ACS content by these authors: