Improving Data Quality for Environmental Fate Models:  A Least-Squares Adjustment Procedure for Harmonizing Physicochemical Properties of Organic Compounds

Urs Schenker, Matthew MacLeod, Martin Scheringer,* and Konrad Hungerbühler
Safety and Environmental Technology Group, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, ETH Hönggerberg, CH-8093 Zürich, Switzerland
Environ. Sci. Technol., 2005, 39 (21), pp 8434–8441
DOI: 10.1021/es0502526
Publication Date (Web): September 22, 2005
Copyright © 2005 American Chemical Society

Abstract

Physicochemical properties (vapor pressure, aqueous solubility, octanol solubility, Henry's law constant, and octanol−air and octanol−water partition coefficients) and their temperature dependencies are required for fate modeling of environmental pollutants. To be internally consistent, measured values for these properties often must be adjusted. The goal of adjusting the property values for consistency is to more accurately estimate the true values. However, consistency and accuracy are not synonymous. If there are systematic errors in one property, then adjustment for consistency may reduce the accuracy of other property data. Here, we provide methods for achieving consistency and improving accuracy in the selection of partitioning properties from literature sources. First, we show that a widely used procedure does not always minimize the adjustments of property values derived from the literature when harmonizing them according to thermodynamic constraints. In such cases, the final adjusted values (FAVs) are unnecessarily different from the literature-derived values (LDVs) selected from measurements. We present an improved procedure based on the theory of least squares that minimizes the adjustment of LDVs and allows quantitative propagation of uncertainty from LDVs to FAVs. When this procedure is applied to partitioning properties for 30 organic chemicals, FAVs obtained differ by up to 30% from those calculated with the current adjustment procedure. Second, we point out that the adjustment procedure is only appropriate for correcting random errors in measurement data. Biased LDVs must be identified and corrected prior to harmonization. Using a set of 16 PCB congeners as a case study, we provide methods to identify biased data and discuss possible sources of bias. We present a new interpretation of property data for the PCBs and a new set of internally consistent properties and quantitative structure−property relationships that we recommend as the best currently available.

Citing Articles

View all 35 citing articles

Citation data is made available by participants in CrossRef's Cited-by Linking service. For a more comprehensive list of citations to this article, users are encouraged to perform a search in SciFinder.

This article has been cited by 24 ACS Journal articles (5 most recent appear below).

Tools

SciFinder Links

Explore by:


History

  • Published In Issue November 01, 2005
  • Received for review February 7, 2005
    Revised manuscript received July 6, 2005
    Accepted August 4, 2005

Recommend & Share

  • Share on ACS NetworkACS Network
  • Add to FacebookFacebook
  • Tweet ThisTweet This
  • Add to CiteULikeCiteULike
  • Add to NewsvineNewsvine
  • Digg ThisDigg This
  • Add to DeliciousDelicious

Related Content

Other ACS content by these authors: