Humic Substances in Soils:  Are They Really Chemically Distinct?

Brian. P. Kelleher and Andre. J. Simpson*
Department of Environmental and Physical Sciences, University of Toronto, Scarborough Campus, Toronto, Ontario M1C 1A4, Canada
Environ. Sci. Technol., 2006, 40 (15), pp 4605–4611
DOI: 10.1021/es0608085
Publication Date (Web): July 4, 2006
Copyright © 2006 American Chemical Society

Abstract

Humic substances (HS) are an operationally defined fraction of soil organic matter, and they represent the largest pool of recalcitrant organic carbon in the terrestrial environment. It has traditionally been thought that extractable HS consist of novel categories of cross-linked macromolecular structures. In this study, advanced nuclear magnetic resonance approaches were used to study the major components (proteins, carbohydrates, aliphatic biopolymers, and lignin) that are known to be present in HS, and to identify their fingerprints in humic mixtures. Theoretically, once all known components have been identified, the remaining signals should be from materials with novel structures, themselves forming a distinct chemical category of humic materials. Surprisingly, nearly all of the NMR signals in traditional HS fractions could be assigned to intact and degrading biopolymers. We therefore suggest that the vast majority of operationally defined humic material in soils is a very complex mixture of microbial and plant biopolymers and their degradation products but not a distinct chemical category. It is important to note this work in no way rules out the existence of a distinct category of humic macromolecules, either at low abundance in the soluble fraction from young soils, in diagenetically evolved samples (for example lignites, etc.), or in the nonextractable humin fraction.

Citing Articles

View all 56 citing articles

Citation data is made available by participants in CrossRef's Cited-by Linking service. For a more comprehensive list of citations to this article, users are encouraged to perform a search in SciFinder.

This article has been cited by 14 ACS Journal articles (5 most recent appear below).

Tools

SciFinder Links

SciFinder subscribers:  Click to sign in | Not a SciFinder subscriber? Learn more at www.cas.org

Explore by:


History

  • Published In Issue August 01, 2006
  • Received for review April 4, 2006
    Revised manuscript received May 27, 2006
    Accepted May 31, 2006

Recommend & Share

  • Share on ACS NetworkACS Network
  • Add to FacebookFacebook
  • Tweet ThisTweet This
  • Add to CiteULikeCiteULike
  • Add to NewsvineNewsvine
  • Digg ThisDigg This
  • Add to DeliciousDelicious

Related Content

Other ACS content by these authors: