Tracking Nonpoint Source Nitrogen Pollution in Human-Impacted Watersheds

Sujay S. Kaushal*, Peter M. Groffman, Lawrence E. Band§, Emily M. Elliott, Catherine A. Shields, and Carol Kendall#
Department of Geology and Earth System Science Interdisciplinary Center, University of Maryland College Park, 5825 University Research Court, College Park, Maryland 20740, United States
Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies, Box AB, Route 44A Millbrook, New York 12545, United States
Department of Geography and Institute for the Environment, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, United States
Department of Geology and Planetary Science, University of Pittsburgh, 4107 O'Hara Street, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260, United States
Bren School of Environmental Science and Management, University of California Santa Barbara, 2400 Bren Hall, Santa Barbara, California 93106-5131, United States
Water Resources Division, U.S. Geological Survey, 345 Middlefield Road, Menlo Park, California 94025, United States
Environ. Sci. Technol., 2011, 45 (19), pp 8225–8232
DOI: 10.1021/es200779e
Publication Date (Web): August 10, 2011
Copyright © 2011 American Chemical Society

Abstract

Abstract Image

Nonpoint source nitrogen (N) pollution is a leading contributor to U.S. water quality impairments. We combined watershed N mass balances and stable isotopes to investigate fate and transport of nonpoint N in forest, agricultural, and urbanized watersheds at the Baltimore Long-Term Ecological Research site. Annual N retention was 55%, 68%, and 82% for agricultural, suburban, and forest watersheds, respectively. Analysis of δ15N-NO3, and δ18O-NO3 indicated wastewater was an important nitrate source in urbanized streams during baseflow. Negative correlations between δ15N-NO3 and δ18O-NO3 in urban watersheds indicated mixing between atmospheric deposition and wastewater, and N source contributions changed with storm magnitude (atmospheric sources contributed 50% at peak storm N loads). Positive correlations between δ15N-NO3 and δ18O-NO3 in watersheds suggested denitrification was removing septic system and agriculturally derived N, but N from belowground leaking sewers was less susceptible to denitrification. N transformations were also observed in a storm drain (no natural drainage network) potentially due to organic carbon inputs. Overall, nonpoint sources such as atmospheric deposition, wastewater, and fertilizer showed different susceptibility to watershed N export. There were large changes in nitrate sources as a function of runoff, and anticipating source changes in response to climate and storms will be critical for managing nonpoint N pollution.

Citing Articles

View all 1 citing articles

Citation data is made available by participants in CrossRef's Cited-by Linking service. For a more comprehensive list of citations to this article, users are encouraged to perform a search in SciFinder.

    Tools

    SciFinder Links

    SciFinder subscribers:  Click to sign in | Not a SciFinder subscriber? Learn more at www.cas.org

    Explore by:


    History

    • Published In Issue October 01, 2011
    • Article ASAPSeptember 02, 2011
    • Just Accepted ManuscriptAugust 10, 2011
    • Received: March 09, 2011
      Accepted: August 10, 2011
      Revised: July 01, 2011

    Recommend & Share

    • Share on ACS NetworkACS Network
    • Add to FacebookFacebook
    • Tweet ThisTweet This
    • Add to CiteULikeCiteULike
    • Add to NewsvineNewsvine
    • Digg ThisDigg This
    • Add to DeliciousDelicious

    Related Content

    Other ACS content by these authors: