Highly Effective Pincer-Ligated Iridium Catalysts for Alkane Dehydrogenation. DFT Calculations of Relevant Thermodynamic, Kinetic, and Spectroscopic Properties

Keming Zhu, Patrick D. Achord, Xiawei Zhang, Karsten Krogh-Jespersen,* and Alan S. Goldman*;
Contribution from the Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08903
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004, 126 (40), pp 13044–13053
DOI: 10.1021/ja047356l
Publication Date (Web): September 17, 2004
Copyright © 2004 American Chemical Society
*

In papers with more than one author, the asterisk indicates the name of the author to whom inquiries about the paper should be addressed.

, agoldman@rutchem.rutgers.edu, ; , krogh@rutchem.rutgers.edu

Abstract

Abstract Image

The p-methoxy-substituted pincer-ligated iridium complexes, (MeO−tBuPCP)IrH4 (RPCP = κ3-C6H3-2,6-(CH2PR2)2) and (MeO−iPrPCP)IrH4, are found to be highly effective catalysts for the dehydrogenation of alkanes (both with and without the use of sacrificial hydrogen acceptors). These complexes offer an interesting comparison with the recently reported bis-phosphinite “POCOP” (RPOCOP = κ3-C6H3-2,6-(OPR2)2) pincer-ligated catalysts, which also show catalytic activity higher than unsubstituted PCP analogues (Göttker-Schnetmann, I.; White, P.; Brookhart, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 1804). On the basis of νCO values of the respective CO adducts, the MeO−PCP complexes appear to be more electron-rich than the parent PCP complexes, whereas the POCOP complexes appear to be more electron-poor. However, the MeO−PCP and POCOP ligands are calculated (DFT) to show effects in the same directions, relative to the parent PCP ligand, for the kinetics and thermodynamics of a broad range of reactions including the addition of C−H and H−H bonds and CO. In general, both ligands favor (relative to unsubstituted PCP) addition to the 14e (pincer)Ir fragments but disfavor addition to the 16e complexes (pincer)IrH2 or (pincer)Ir(CO). These kinetic and thermodynamic effects are all largely attributable to the same electronic feature:  O → C(aryl) π-donation, from the methoxy or phosphinito groups of the respective ligands. DFT calculations also indicate that the kinetics (but not the thermodynamics) of C−H addition to (pincer)Ir are favored by σ-withdrawal from the phosphorus atoms. The high νCO value of (POCOP)Ir(CO) is attributable to electrostatic effects, rather than decreased Ir−CO π-donation or increased OC−Ir σ-donation.

Tools

History

  • Published In Issue October 13, 2004
  • Received May 5, 2004

Recommend & Share

Related Content

Other ACS content by these authors: