HIV-1 Protease Inhibitors from Inverse Design in the Substrate Envelope Exhibit Subnanomolar Binding to Drug-Resistant Variants

Michael D. Altman, Akbar Ali, G. S. Kiran Kumar Reddy, Madhavi N. L. Nalam, Saima Ghafoor Anjum, Hong Cao, Sripriya Chellappan, Visvaldas Kairys, Miguel X. Fernandes, Michael K. Gilson, Celia A. Schiffer, Tariq M. Rana, Bruce Tidor
Department of Chemistry, Department of Biological Engineering, and Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, and Chemical Biology Program, University of Massachuetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts 01605, and Center for Advanced Research in Biotechnology, University of Maryland Biotechnology Institute, 9600 Gudelsky Drive, Rockville, Maryland 20850
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130 (19), pp 6099–6113
DOI: 10.1021/ja076558p
Publication Date (Web): April 16, 2008
Copyright © 2008 American Chemical Society

Abstract

Abstract Image

The acquisition of drug-resistant mutations by infectious pathogens remains a pressing health concern, and the development of strategies to combat this threat is a priority. Here we have applied a general strategy, inverse design using the substrate envelope, to develop inhibitors of HIV-1 protease. Structure-based computation was used to design inhibitors predicted to stay within a consensus substrate volume in the binding site. Two rounds of design, synthesis, experimental testing, and structural analysis were carried out, resulting in a total of 51 compounds. Improvements in design methodology led to a roughly 1000-fold affinity enhancement to a wild-type protease for the best binders, from a Ki of 30–50 nM in round one to below 100 pM in round two. Crystal structures of a subset of complexes revealed a binding mode similar to each design that respected the substrate envelope in nearly all cases. All four best binders from round one exhibited broad specificity against a clinically relevant panel of drug-resistant HIV-1 protease variants, losing no more than 6–13-fold affinity relative to wild type. Testing a subset of second-round compounds against the panel of resistant variants revealed three classes of inhibitors: robust binders (maximum affinity loss of 14–16-fold), moderate binders (35–80-fold), and susceptible binders (greater than 100-fold). Although for especially high-affinity inhibitors additional factors may also be important, overall, these results suggest that designing inhibitors using the substrate envelope may be a useful strategy in the development of therapeutics with low susceptibility to resistance.

Tools

History

  • Published In Issue May 14, 2008
  • Article ASAPApril 16, 2008
  • Received: September 09, 2007
    Accepted: February 25, 2008

Recommend & Share

Related Content

Other ACS content by these authors: