A Unified Perspective on the Hydrogen Atom Transfer and Proton-Coupled Electron Transfer Mechanisms in Terms of Topographic Features of the Ground and Excited Potential Energy Surfaces As Exemplified by the Reaction between Phenol and Radicals

Oksana Tishchenko, Donald G. Truhlar, Arnout Ceulemans and Minh Tho Nguyen
Department of Chemistry and Supercomputing Institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455-0431, and Department of Chemistry and Mathematical Modelling and Computational Science Center, University of Leuven, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130 (22), pp 7000–7010
DOI: 10.1021/ja7102907
Publication Date (Web): May 9, 2008
Copyright © 2008 American Chemical Society

University of Minnesota.

,

University of Leuven.

Abstract

Abstract Image

The relation between the hydrogen atom transfer (HAT) and proton-coupled electron transfer (PCET) mechanisms is discussed and is illustrated by multiconfigurational electronic structure calculations on the ArOH + R → ArO + RH reactions. The key topographic features of the Born–Oppenheimer potential energy surfaces that determine the predominant reaction mechanism are the conical intersection seam of the two lowest states and reaction saddle points located on the shoulders of this seam. The saddle point corresponds to a crossing of two interacting valence bond states corresponding to the reactant and product bonding patterns, and the conical intersection corresponds to the noninteracting intersection of the same two diabatic states. The locations of mechanistically relevant conical intersection structures and relevant saddle point structures are presented for the reactions between phenol and the N- and O-centered radicals, NH2 and OOCH3. Points on the conical intersection of the ground doublet D0 and first excited doublet D1 states are found to be in close geometric and energetic proximity to the reaction saddle points. In such systems, either the HAT mechanism or both the HAT mechanism and the proton-coupled electron transfer (PCET) mechanism can take place, depending on the relative energetic accessibility of the reaction saddle points and the D0/D1 conical intersection seams. The discussion shows how the two mechanisms are related and how they blend into each other along intermediate reaction paths. The recognition that the saddle point governing the HAT mechanism is on the shoulder of the conical intersection governing the PCET mechanism is used to provide a unified view of the competition between the two mechanisms (and the blending of the two mechanisms) in terms of the prominent and connected features of the potential energy surface, namely the saddle point and the conical intersection. The character of the dual mechanism may be understood in terms of the dominant valence bond configurations of the intersecting states, which are zero-order approximations to the diabatic states.

Tools

History

  • Published In Issue June 04, 2008
  • Article ASAPMay 09, 2008
  • Received: November 13, 2007
    Accepted: March 11, 2008

Recommend & Share

Related Content

Other ACS content by these authors: