A Simple Model of Water and the Hydrophobic Effect

Kevin A. T. Silverstein, A. D. J. Haymet,* and Ken A. Dill*§
Contribution from the Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry and Graduate Group in Biophysics, University of California, San Francisco, California 94143-1204, and School of Chemistry, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1998, 120 (13), pp 3166–3175
DOI: 10.1021/ja973029k
Publication Date (Web): March 19, 1998
Copyright © 1998 American Chemical Society

 Graduate Group in Biophysics. Present address:  Department of Chemistry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455.

,
*

 To whom correspondence should be addressed.

,

 University of Sydney. Present address:  Department of Chemistry and Institute for Molecular Design, University of Houston, Texas 77204.

,
§

 Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry.

Abstract

We use a simple computational model, proposed originally by Ben-Naim, to study the anomalous properties of water and the hydrophobic effect. Water molecules are modeled as two-dimensional (2D) Lennard-Jones disks, with three orientation-dependent hydrogen-bonding arms, arranged as in the Mercedes Benz (MB) logo. Phase space is explored using NPT Monte Carlo simulations. For pure water, the MB model qualitatively predicts the density anomaly (and the related negative thermal expansion coefficient at low temperature), the minimum in the isothermal compressibility as a function of temperature, the large anomalous heat capacity, and freezing to the 2D model analogue of ice, a low-density hexagonal crystal phase. For the solvation of nonpolar solutes (disks without H bonds), the model predicts the experimental trends with temperature of the free energy, entropy, enthalpy, molar volume, and heat capacity. A unique feature of these simulations is that they provide well-converged heat capacities of transfer, an important fingerprint of hydrophobicity. This model gives an explanation for the temperature, TS, at which the transfer entropy of nonpolar solutes is zero:  below this temperature, shell water molecules have more hydrogen bonding than bulk water molecules; above TS, the reverse is true.

Tools

History

  • Published In Issue April 08, 1998
  • Received August 28, 1997
    Revised January 21, 1998

Recommend & Share

Related Content

Other ACS content by these authors: