Article
Dissipation of the Herbicide [14C]Dimethenamid under Anaerobic Conditions in Flooded Soil Microcosms
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: (217)333-8632. Fax: (217)333-6968. E-mail: jcrawfor@uiuc.edu.
Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences.
Present address: Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering.
Invasive Weed Management, USDA-ARS.
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering.
Present address: Department of Environmental Engineering and Science, Clemson University, Anderson, SC 29625.
Abstract
The objective of this research was to investigate the dissipation of the herbicide dimethenamid under anaerobic redox conditions that may develop in the soil environment. Soil−water biometers were prepared with a saturated soil and made anaerobic by either glucose pretreatment (according to the Environmental Protection Agency registration study for anaerobic fate) or N2 sparging. Treatments included glucose pretreatment, NO3- + SO42- amendment, unamended, and autoclaved. Volatile, aqueous, extractable, and bound (unextractable) 14C-residues were quantified and characterized. The redox potential decreased over time, and evidence of denitrifying, iron-reducing, sulfate-reducing, and methanogenic conditions was observed, depending on the amendments. Anaerobic degradation of 14C-dimethenamid occurred in all treatments, and the time observed for 50% disappearance (DT50) was 13−14 days for nonautoclaved treatments. 14C-metabolites accumulated to up to 20% of applied 14C. At least two major metabolites were observed in nonautoclaved treatments, whereas only one was observed in autoclaved microcosms. More than 50% of the applied 14C was eventually incorporated into soil-bound residue.
Keywords: Anaerobic aquatic metabolism; anaerobic herbicide degradation; chloroacetamide; dimethenamid; flooded soil; SAN 582 H
View: Full Text HTML | Hi-Res PDF
Tools
-
Add to Favorites
-
Download Citation
-
Email a Colleague -
Permalink
Order Reprints
Rights & Permissions
Citation Alerts
History
- Published In Issue March 13, 2002
- Received for review May 11, 2001. Revised manuscript received December 10, 2001. Accepted December 10, 2001. J.J.C. is grateful for graduate support provided by the U.S. Department of Agriculture and additional funding from the Illinois Department of Natural Resources (Contract No. HWR 99148). Names are necessary to report factually on available data; however, the United States Department of Agriculture neither guarantees nor warrants the standard of the product, and the use of the name by the USDA implies no approval of the product to the exclusion of others that may also be suitable.
Cart




