Simulated Glyphosate Drift Influences Nitrate Assimilation and Nitrogen Fixation in Non-glyphosate-Resistant Soybean

Nacer Bellaloui,* Krishna N. Reddy, Robert M. Zablotowicz, and Alemu Mengistu§
Crop Genetics and Production Research Unit and Southern Weed Science Research Unit, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 141 Experiment Station Road, Stoneville, Mississippi 38776; and Crop Genetics and Production Research Unit, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 605 Airway Boulevard, Jackson, Tennessee 38301
J. Agric. Food Chem., 2006, 54 (9), pp 3357–3364
DOI: 10.1021/jf053198l
Publication Date (Web): April 1, 2006
Copyright Not subject to U.S. Copyright. Published 2006 American Chemical Society
*

 Corresponding author [telephone (662) 686-2531; fax (662) 686-5218; e-mail nbellaloui@msa-stoneville.ars.usda.gov].

,

 Crop Genetics and Production Research Unit, Stoneville, MS.

,

 Southern Weed Science Research Unit.

,
§

 Crop Genetics and Production Research Unit, Jackson, TN.

Abstract

Nontarget injury from glyphosate drift is a concern among growers using non-glyphosate-resistant (non-GR) cultivars. The effects of glyphosate drift on nitrate assimilation and nitrogen fixation potential, nodule mass, and yield of non-GR soybean were assessed in a field trial at Stoneville, MS. A non-GR soybean cultivar ‘Delta Pine 4748S' was treated with glyphosate at 12.5% of use rate of 0.84 kg of active ingredient/ha at 3 (V2), 6 (V7), and 8 (R2, full bloom) weeks after planting (WAP) soybean to simulate glyphosate drift. Untreated soybean was used as a control. Soybeans were sampled weekly for 2 weeks after each glyphosate treatment to assess nitrate assimilation and N2 fixation potential. Nitrate assimilation was assessed using in vivo nitrate reductase assay in leaves, stems, roots, and nodules. Nitrogen fixation potential was assessed by measuring nitrogenase activity using the acetylene reduction assay (ARA). Nitrogen content of leaves, shoots, and seed and soybean yield were also determined. In the first sampling date (4 WAP), glyphosate drift caused a significant decrease in NRA in leaves (60%), stems (77%), and nodules (50%), with no decrease in roots. At later growth stages, NRA in leaves was more sensitive to glyphosate drift than stems and roots. Nitrogenase activity was reduced 36−58% by glyphosate treatment at 3 or 6 WAP. However, glyphosate treatment at 8 WAP had no effect on nitrogenase activity. Nitrogen content was affected by glyphosate application only in shoots after the first application. No yield, seed nitrogen, protein, or oil concentration differences were detected. These results suggest that nitrate assimilation and nitrogen fixation potential were significantly reduced by glyphosate drift, with the greatest sensitivity early in vegetative growth. Soybean has the ability to recover from the physiological stress caused by glyphosate drift.

Keywords: Acetylene reduction assay; glyphosate; nitrate assimilation; nitrate reductase activity; nitrogen fixation; nitrogenase activity

Tools

History

  • Published In Issue May 03, 2006
  • Received for review December 21, 2005. Revised manuscript received March 6, 2006. Accepted March 8, 2006. Mention of trade names or commercial products in this publication is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

Recommend & Share

Related Content

Other ACS content by these authors: