HPLC Quantification of Sphingolipids in Soybeans with Modified Palmitate Content

Liping Wang, Tong Wang,* and Walter R. Fehr§
Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition and Department of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011
J. Agric. Food Chem., 2006, 54 (20), pp 7422–7428
DOI: 10.1021/jf061624c
Publication Date (Web): September 12, 2006
Copyright © 2006 American Chemical Society

 Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition.

,
*

 Address correspondence to this author at the Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, 2312 Food Sciences Building, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011-1061 [telephone (515) 294-5448; fax (515) 294-8181; e-mail tongwang@iastate.edu].

,
§

 Department of Agronomy.

Abstract

Efficient separation and accurate quantification of sphingolipids (SL) are important for studying SL concentrations and biological functions. The objectives of this study were to develop effective methods for the separation and quantification of SL and to determine the relationship between palmitate and SL contents of mature soybean seeds. Methods using column chromatography and high-performance liquid chromatography−evaporative light scattering detector (HPLC-ELSD) were developed to separate and quantify glucosylceramide (GlcCer) and ceramide (Cer) in 15 soybeans lines in which palmitate content ranged from 3.7 to 40.7%. There were significant differences among the lines for GlcCer (83.4−397.6 nmol/g) and major Cer contents (8.4−20.7 nmol/g) on a dry weight basis. The correlations of palmitate content with GlcCer and Cer concentrations were not significant. The results indicated that the palmitate content of soybean seed did not affect their GlcCer and Cer contents. Genetic factors other than those that control palmitate content seemed to be responsible for the variation among soybean lines for GlcCer and Cer contents.

Keywords: Sphingolipids; glucosylceramide; ceramide; palmitate content; HPLC quantification; soybean

Tools

History

  • Published In Issue October 04, 2006
  • Received for review June 9, 2006. Revised manuscript received July 31, 2006. Accepted August 7, 2006. We thank the Center for Designing Foods to Improve Nutrition (CDFIN) at Iowa State University for financial support.

Recommend & Share

Related Content

Other ACS content by these authors: