Neighborhood Behavior:  A Useful Concept for Validation of “Molecular Diversity” Descriptors

David E. Patterson,* Richard D. Cramer, Allan M. Ferguson, Robert D. Clark, and Laurence E. Weinberger
Tripos, Inc., 1699 South Hanley Road, St. Louis, Missouri 63144, and 882 South Matlack Street, West Chester, Pennsylvania 19380
J. Med. Chem., 1996, 39 (16), pp 3049–3059
DOI: 10.1021/jm960290n
Publication Date (Web): August 2, 1996
Copyright © 1996 American Chemical Society
*

 To whom correspondence should be addressed.

,

 West Chester, PA.

Abstract

When searching for new leads, testing molecules that are too “similar” is wasteful, but when investigating a lead, testing molecules that are “similar” to the lead is efficient. Two questions then arise. Which are the molecular descriptors that should be “similar”? How much “similarity” is enough? These questions are answered by demonstrating that, if a molecular descriptor is to be a valid and useful measure of “similarity” in drug discovery, a plot of differences in its values vs differences in biological activities for a set of related molecules will exhibit a characteristic trapezoidal distribution enhancement, revealing a “neighborhood behavior” for the descriptor. Applying this finding to 20 datasets allows 11 molecular diversity descriptors to be ranked by their validity for compound library design. In order of increasing frequency of usefulness, these are random numbers = log P = MR = strain energy < connectivity indices < 2D fingerprints (whole molecule) = atom pairs = autocorrelation indices < steric CoMFA fields = 2D fingerprints (side chain only) = H-bonding CoMFA fields.

Tools

SciFinder Links

SciFinder subscribers:  Click to sign in | Not a SciFinder subscriber? Learn more at www.cas.org

History

  • Published In Issue August 02, 1996
  • Received April 18, 1996

Recommend & Share

Related Content

Other ACS content by these authors: