Conformational Studies on (17α,20Z)-21-(X-Phenyl)-19-norpregna-1,3,5(10),20-tetraene-3,17β-diols Using 1D and 2D NMR Spectroscopy and GIAO Calculations of 13C Shieldings

Albert B. Sebag, Carolyn J. Friel, Robert N. Hanson,* and David A. Forsyth
Departments of Pharmaceutical Science and Chemistry, Northeastern University, 360 Huntington Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02115
J. Org. Chem., 2000, 65 (23), pp 7902–7912
DOI: 10.1021/jo000806h
Publication Date (Web): October 13, 2000
Copyright © 2000 American Chemical Society
*

In papers with more than one author, the asterisk indicates the name of the author to whom inquiries about the paper should be addressed.

, r.hanson@nunet.neu.edu

Abstract

Abstract Image

Differences in agonist responses of the novel estrogen receptor ligands (17α,20Z)-(p-methoxyphenyl)vinyl estradiol (1), (17α,20Z)-(o-α,α,α-trifluoromethylphenyl)vinyl estradiol (2), and (17α,20Z)-(o-hydroxymethylphenyl)vinyl estradiol (3) led us to investigate their solution conformation. In competitive binding assay studies, we observed that several phenyl-substituted (17α,20E/Z)-(X-phenyl)vinyl estradiols exhibited significant estrogen receptor binding, but with variation (RBA (1) = 20; RBA (2) = 23; RBA (3) = 140 where estradiol RBA = 100) depending on the phenyl substitution pattern. Because the 17α-phenylvinyl substituent interacts with the key helix-12 of the ligand binding domain, we considered that differences in the preferred conformation of 13 could account for their varying binding affinity. 2D NMR experiments at 500 MHz allowed the complete assignment of the 13C and 1H spectra of 13. The conformations of these compounds in solution were established by 2D and 1D NOESY spectroscopy. A statistical approach of evaluating contributing conformers of 13 from predicted 13C shifts correlated quite well with the NOE data. The 17α substituents of 1 and 2 exist in similar conformational equilibria with some differences in relative populations of conformers. In contrast, the 17α substituent of 3 exists in a different conformational equilibrium. The similarity in solution conformations of 1 and 2 suggests they occupy a similar receptor volume, consistent with similar RBA values of 20 and 23. Conversely, the different conformational equilibria of 3 may contribute to the significant binding affinity (RBA = 140) of this ligand.

Tools

History

  • Published In Issue November 17, 2000
  • Received May 24, 2000

Recommend & Share

Related Content

Other ACS content by these authors: