Computational Electrochemistry: The Aqueous Ru3+|Ru2+ Reduction Potential

Pablo Jaque, Aleksandr V. Marenich, Christopher J. Cramer,* and Donald G. Truhlar*
Department of Chemistry and Supercomputing Institute, 207 Pleasant Street SE, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455-0431
J. Phys. Chem. C, 2007, 111 (15), pp 5783–5799
DOI: 10.1021/jp066765w
Publication Date (Web): March 28, 2007
Copyright © 2007 American Chemical Society
*

 E-mail:  cramer@chem.umn.edu (C.J.C.); truhlar@chem.umn.edu (D.G.T.).

Abstract

We present results of density functional calculations for the standard reduction potential of the Ru3+|Ru2+ couple in aqueous solution. The metal cations are modeled as [Ru(H2O)n]q+ surrounded by continuum solvent (q = 2, 3; n = 6, 18). The continuum model includes bulk electrostatic polarization as well as atomic surface tensions accounting for the deviation of the second or third hydration shell from the bulk. After consideration of 37 density functionals with 5 different basis sets, it has been found that hybrid and hybrid meta functionals provide the most accurate predictions for the [Ru(H2O)n]q+ geometries and for the corresponding reduction potential in comparison with available experimental data. The gas-phase ionization potentials of [Ru(H2O)n]2+ calculated by density functional theory are also compared to results of ab initio computations using second-order Møller−Plesset perturbation theory. The difference in solvation free energies of Ru3+ and Ru2+ varies from −10.56 to −10.99 eV for n = 6 and from −6.83 to −7.45 eV for n = 18 depending on the density functional and basis set quality. The aqueous standard reduction potential is overestimated when only the first solvation shell is treated explicitly and is underestimated when the first and second solvation shells are treated explicitly.

Tools

History

  • Published In Issue April 19, 2007
  • Received October 14, 2006
    Revised January 16, 2007

Recommend & Share

Related Content

Other ACS content by these authors: