Effect of Sequence Distribution on Copolymer Interfacial Activity

Michelle D. Lefebvre, Christine M. Dettmer, Rachel L. McSwain, Chen Xu,§ Jonathan R. Davila, Russell J. Composto,§ SonBinh T. Nguyen, and Kenneth R. Shull*
Department of Materials Science and Engineering and Department of Chemistry, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208, and Department of Materials Science and Engineering and Laboratory for Research on the Structure of Matter, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6272
Macromolecules, 2005, 38 (25), pp 10494–10502
DOI: 10.1021/ma0509762
Publication Date (Web): November 10, 2005
Copyright © 2005 American Chemical Society

 Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Northwestern University.

,

 Department of Chemistry, Northwestern University.

,
§

 University of Pennsylvania.

,
*

 To whom correspondence should be addressed:  e-mail k-shull@northwestern.edu.

Abstract

Interfacial segregation of diblock, gradient, and random copolymers was measured using forward recoil spectrometry. The polymers were synthesized by a ring-opening metathesis polymerization, allowing a high degree of control over the sequence distribution. The norbornene-based monomers have reactivity ratios close to unity, which makes them ideal for facile tailoring of different gradient copolymer profiles. The copolymers form a good weakly segregating model system for which we can obtain an estimate of the interaction parameter χ. Mean-field theory was used to describe the interfacial segregation results and to relate the measured quantities to the detailed molecular structure of the interface. The diblock copolymer forms a monolayer at the interface and significantly reduces the interfacial tension, while the random copolymer forms an interfacial wetting layer. The gradient copolymer exhibits intermediate behavior, forming a monolayer with a larger interfacial width than that of the diblock copolymer.

Tools

History

  • Published In Issue December 13, 2005
  • Received May 10, 2005
    Revised Manuscript Received September 2, 2005

Recommend & Share