The “Indenyl Effect” in Zirconocene Dihydride Chemistry

Christopher A. Bradley, Ivan Keresztes, Emil Lobkovsky, and Paul J. Chirik*
Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Baker Laboratory, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853
Organometallics, 2006, 25 (8), pp 2080–2089
DOI: 10.1021/om060035t
Publication Date (Web): March 9, 2006
Copyright © 2006 American Chemical Society
*

In papers with more than one author, the asterisk indicates the name of the author to whom inquiries about the paper should be addressed.

Abstract

Abstract Image

The second-order rate constants for the insertion of cyclohexene into substituted bis(indenyl)zirconocene dihydrides, (η5-C9H5-1,3-R2)2ZrH2 (R = SiMe3, CHMe2), to yield the cyclohexyl hydride complexes have been measured. Comparison of these values to the corresponding tetrahydroindenyl derivatives (η5-C9H9-1,3-R2)2ZrH2 reveals significantly faster insertion reactions for the bis(indenyl) compounds. Accordingly, primarily σ-donating ligands such as PMe3, PEt3, and tetrahydrothiophene coordinate to (η5-C9H5-1,3-(CHMe2)2)2ZrH2 to form (η5-C9H5-1,3-(CHMe2)2)2ZrH2(L) compounds, one of which (L = PMe3) has been structurally characterized. In contrast, the more electron-rich zirconocene tetrahydroindenyl dihydrides exhibit weaker binding in solution. Taken together, these results establish an “indenyl effect” in zirconocene hydride chemistry likely arising from increased electrophilicity of the metal center, rather than a change in hapticity along the reaction coordinate.

Tools

History

  • Published In Issue April 10, 2006
  • Received January 11, 2006

Recommend & Share

Related Content

Other ACS content by these authors: