Article

Promiscuous 2-Aminothiazoles (PrATs): A Frequent Hitting Scaffold

Medicinal Chemistry, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia
Oncology iMed, AstraZeneca, Unit 310 − Darwin Building, Cambridge Science Park, Milton Road, Cambridge CB4 0WG, United Kingdom
J. Med. Chem., 2015, 58 (3), pp 1205–1214
DOI: 10.1021/jm501402x
Publication Date (Web): January 5, 2015
Copyright © 2015 American Chemical Society
*E-mail: martin.scanlon@monash.edu. Phone: +61 3 99039540.

Abstract

Abstract Image

We have identified a class of molecules, known as 2-aminothiazoles (2-ATs), as frequent-hitting fragments in biophysical binding assays. This was exemplified by 4-phenylthiazol-2-amine being identified as a hit in 14/14 screens against a diverse range of protein targets, suggesting that this scaffold is a poor starting point for fragment-based drug discovery. This prompted us to analyze this scaffold in the context of an academic fragment library used for fragment-based drug discovery (FBDD) and two larger compound libraries used for high-throughput screening (HTS). This analysis revealed that such “promiscuous 2-aminothiazoles” (PrATs) behaved as frequent hitters under both FBDD and HTS settings, although the problem was more pronounced in the fragment-based studies. As 2-ATs are present in known drugs, they cannot necessarily be deemed undesirable, but the combination of their promiscuity and difficulties associated with optimizing them into a lead compound makes them, in our opinion, poor scaffolds for fragment libraries.

Supporting Information


SPR sensorgrams of positive controls and selected compounds, STD, HSQC-NMR, and SPR-derived binding data for the different targets, 2-AT PAINS subclasses, frequent hitter incidence, and SMILES string identifiers in csv format. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

  • This user does not have a subscription to this publication. Please contact your librarian to recommend that your institution subscribe to this publication.
To gain access:

Purchase This Content

Choose from the following options:

Metrics

Article Views: 3,987 Times
Received 12 September 2014
Published online 5 January 2015
Published in print 12 February 2015
Learn more about these metrics Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.
+
More Article Metrics
Explore by: