CHEMTECH
March 1998
CHEMTECH 1998, 28(3), 30-35.
Copyright © 1998 by the American Chemical Society.


Integrated pest management using pheromones

Cover art

These compounds can be used in many ways to reduce the amount of conventional pesticide applied to crops. Pheromones can be used to determine how many pests are present, to lure the pests into traps, and to confuse the pests so they do not reproduce.

Arnon Shani



Intensified pest control seems to be the best way to feed the world's growing population, from both political and social viewpoints (see sidbar, The problem: Providing food for a growing population). However, the ever-increasing use of conventional pesticides leads to resistant pests, severely alters natural ecology, damages the environment, and--ultimately--adversely affects the economy. The number of insect and other species developing resistance to pesticides is growing steadily, forcing chemical companies to develop novel pesticide formulas. The R&D and approval process for new formulations is expensive and slow, and companies often are not willing to make such a large investment for the short term of protection left on a patent.

Of course, it would be a mistake to overlook the benefits of pesticides. During the past few decades, pesticide use has increased agricultural outputs worldwide. Yet in percentage terms, crop losses have remained unchanged since the 1950s (2).



TO SIDEBAR: The problem: Providing food...



In response to the problems caused by the increased use of conventional pesticides, the concept of integrated pest management (IPM) was developed. IPM combines chemical, biological, and agrotechnical approaches to achieve pest control at a reasonable cost while minimizing damage to the environment. It is important to note that, in the case of agricultural exports, nothing less than total eradication of pests is required to prevent the transfer of agricultural pests between countries.

The first step in IPM is effective monitoring using pheromones. The pest is located, and its diffusion in the field or orchard is determined. Next, the best method is selected for the given situation. Biological and biologically derived pest control methods exploit the known natural enemies of pests and parasites but do not attack harmless insects; two examples are bacteria (such as Bacillus thuringiensis, which attacks the larvae of pests including mosquitoes, Egyptian cotton leafworm [Spodoptera littoralis], and Heliothis and Helicoverpa spp. moths) and viruses that target certain pests (see Figure 1 for more examples). Pheromones also can be used for mass trapping or causing "confusion", especially when the pest population is rather diffuse. If none of these methods is effective--that is, when the pest population is dense--the last recourse is to bring in the "heavy guns": pesticides.


figure 1 Figure 1. Proposed classification...


Chemical communication
Living beings communicate with each other by transmitting information and messages via the five senses. Hearing and touch are essentially physical senses, whereas taste and smell are chemical--that is, based on interactions between molecules and receptors in the appropriate organs. Sight combines the initial physical processes with chemical ones. The two chemical senses have scarcely been investigated, and limited information is available regarding the mechanisms involved. Sustained interest in the subject has developed only in recent years.

Chemical communication among animals occurs by way of many groups of chemicals, classified according to the agent of dissemination, the receiving individual, and the benefit to the sender or to the receiver. These chemicals, known collectively as semiochemicals or infochemicals, include pheromones and allelochemicals (see sidebar, The infochemicals: Classification and history) (3).



TO SIDEBAR: The infochemicals...



The communication chemicals shown in Figure 1 are among the pest-control agents currently on the market and substances with pesticidal potential. In the rest of this article, I focus specifically on pheromone action among insects, the largest class in the animal kingdom. My emphasis is moths, the larvae of which form the largest group of agricultural pests; however, beetles, flies, and other insects also inflict severe crop damage.

Sex pheromone
The role of this key pheromone is to summon the opposite sex of the species to engage in reproductive activity. Like most pheromones, it is made up of a mixture of substances that individually are not pheromones; only the complete set, with the relative concentrations of the components, can determine the unique character of the pheromone. The exclusive composition of each species' sex pheromone ensures the reproductive isolation of related species by preventing undesirable interspecies hybridization.

Field measurements have demonstrated the impressive navigational skills of insects. In experiments in which tagged males were distributed in a field, most of the males were recovered in traps containing virgin females secreting the sex pheromone. Most recoveries were in traps placed along the flight path upwind from the source, as expected. The pheromone quantities secreted and scattered into the air are minute, on the order of 1 ng (10-9 g). A few thousand molecules are sufficient to set the chemobiological process in motion. Laboratory tests have shown that concentrations of as little as 10-18 g/cm3 of air are enough to sexually arouse the male silkworm and cause it to search for the source of the smell (6).

Basic research has been under way during the past few years with the aim of understanding the sensing mechanism completely: from first penetration of the pheromone molecules in the antenna hair, to the transport of the molecules in the fluid medium by special proteins, the interaction between the complex (or single pheromone molecules alone) and appropriate receptors, the triggering of an electric current, and transmission of the nerve impulse to a central or local nerve center in the insect, leading to a change in behavior or other processes. Also under way are studies of the biochemical processes responsible for expelling the pheromone molecules from the receptor, to enable renewal of nerve activity and ensure its continuity, and the biosynthesis of sex pheromones and hormonal control of the process (7).

Application of pheromones for pest control
The principal potential applications of pheromones--especially sex pheromones--in a sophisticated and environmentally friendly IPM system are monitoring, mass trapping, attract-and-kill, and disruption of communication (also known as confusion) (8, 9).

Monitoring. Because pheromones are unique--specifically, because every species has an exclusive sex pheromone--they can be exploited to determine the size of a pest population. Traps containing the appropriate sex pheromone are placed in the field, duly protected from environmental influences such as light and oxygen, as a bait to attract the opposite sex of the species. A farmer can obtain precise and reliable information concerning the size of the pest population, where it is located, when it first appeared, and so on and subsequently decide when to spray pesticides, which section of the field to spray, and which chemical and concentration will be effective.

This approach does not eliminate the use of standard pesticides, but it does reduce the quantity applied to the field and the amount of the field that must be sprayed. Efficient monitoring makes it possible to time treatments to coincide with the start of the pest's active season or with massive onslaughts. The pheromone serves as a sensitive detector that may be exploited to make intelligent decisions about pesticides. This approach is used worldwide for a wide variety of crops.

Mass trapping. The underlying assumption of this approach is that scattering traps in the field ensures that many individuals will be trapped, significantly hindering fertilization and the production of a new generation of pests. As a result, fewer chemical treatments are required; in some cases, the need for chemical treatment is eliminated. Some pests that have been controlled using this method include the Egyptian cotton leafworm in Israel, which blights many crops (especially cotton, alfalfa, and vegetables); the processionary pine moth in Spain, a severe pest of pine; and the bark beetle in Scandinavia, which affects forest trees.

Attract-and-kill. Pesticides are placed inside centrally located containers or other point sources that are baited with sex or aggregation pheromones, eliminating the need to scatter the insecticide in the field. The insect is attracted to the dispenser loaded with the pheromone and comes into contact with the poisonous chemical. The efficiency of chemical pest control is increased, and environmental pollution is minimized. This method has been successful in cotton field trials.

Disruption of communication or "confusion". Individuals are drawn to a pheromone source against the wind, from a zone of low concentration to a zone of high concentration. If an artificial "zone" is created in which pheromone concentration is constant, uniform, and higher than that generated naturally by males or females, then the individual's capacity to detect and locate the pheromone source will be significantly impaired. In other words, an individual will be unable to find its way to the source of the pheromone and accomplish fertilization; the species will not be perpetuated.

The mechanism or chemobiological process responsible for confusion is not fully understood. Still, the evidence indicates several possibilities. One is a false trail: The individual flies toward the artificial source of pheromone, which diffuses a larger dose of active chemical(s) than the natural source (e.g., a calling female) and thus conceals it. Another possibility is habituation or adaptation. Marked by a desensitization of the sense of smell, it is as if the sensors are switched off and lose the capacity to react. Perhaps all the receptors in the pheromone-sensing cells become saturated by an uninterrupted stream of molecules, making them unable to produce the required nerve pulse. Yet another explanation is the recipient's inability to detect concentration differentials that point toward the natural source of the pheromones.

Whatever the mechanism involved, the results are inhibited mating and the laying of unfertilized eggs, leading to near-complete eradication of the next generation of the pest. Confusion has been applied in cotton fields to control the pink bollworm, Pectinophora gossypiella (United States and elsewhere; initial trials were made in Egypt, Israel, and Pakistan), and also has been used to eradicate pests that attack deciduous fruit trees (Europe, New Zealand, United States, and Australia) and vineyard grapes (Europe).

Of all the approaches described, the latter (disrupting communication) presumably will become the preferred pest control method because it is environmentally friendly, free of toxins, economically attractive, and effective. This method already competes, with varying degrees of success, with currently used chemical pesticides, and the day when the heavy pesticides industry also adopts this new approach may not be far away.

Other approaches. Monitoring, mass trapping, attract-and-kill, and confusion are pest control methods based mainly on the sex pheromones. Insects secrete other pheromones that also can be exploited for pest control. For example, alarm pheromone sprayed on plants keeps certain leaf aphids away. Compounds that resemble the pheromone in structure can inhibit and disrupt chemical communication. Some compounds act as repellants, scattering the pests and keeping them away from the affected crop. Recent preliminary trials used egg-laying-deterrent pheromones, which affect fertilized females by interfering with the egg-laying process.

Global pheromone use
In the early 1990s, I conducted a survey to determine the scope of pheromone use worldwide (10). Questionnaires were sent to 142 researchers, scientists, and people from industry and marketing associated with pheromones--half of whom were from universities and research institutions and half from industry. Twenty-five countries were represented. From the responses (~60% of the individuals surveyed), I determined the percentage of use for each of the following methods:

Monitoring 32.1
Mass trapping 23.3
Attract-and-kill 2.2
Confusion 42.4

From the survey data, I determined that 1,313,000 hectares (ha) were treated with pheromones--1% of the cultivated land in the world (see sidebar, Pheromone use worldwide). More areas are being treated now than when the survey was conducted, and the use of pheromones in pest control is increasing.



TO SIDEBAR: Pheromone use...


The pheromone use data indicate that the principal target pests are moths. This majority results partly because research has largely focused on this particular group, which includes numerous harmful pests, but also because the components of moth pheromones belong to very limited classes of organic compounds: alcohols, acetates, and aldehydes of straight-chain C10-C18 molecules with one or two double bonds or, in a few instances, three double bonds. This feature has facilitated the rapid characterization of the components. The starting materials vary only slightly, and the methods used to produce the various pheromones are very similar.

Use of the confusion technique is expected to increase in the future. The technique is clean and easy, farmers like it, and it meets the requirements of the growing number of consumers who demand pesticide-free agricultural products. These consumers are prepared to pay double the price of conventional produce (or more) for the "organic" designation, particularly in the United States, Japan, and Europe.

The confusion method is preferred mainly in countries that have already experimented with pheromones: the developed countries of western Europe and North America as well as Japan, Australia, and New Zealand. In line with the extensive research on ways to protect valuable cotton crops from pests, pheromone use is already widespread in that industry. With the development of efficient confusion techniques over wide areas, fruit and other produce (e.g., rice, corn, and vegetables) soon will benefit from pheromone-based pest control methods.

In the early 1990s, annual sales of pheromones were valued at some tens of millions of dollars. The annual sales forecast for the next decade is hundreds of millions and even billions of dollars, equivalent to about 20% of the insecticide market, even though the cost for pheromones has dropped rapidly (from $10-20/g down to a few dollars per gram).

What about resistance to pheromones?
An important question we must consider is whether insects can become pheromone-resistant. The answer is, unequivocally, no. Resistance implies nullification of the harmful effect of the given active substance. Pheromones are essential to insects for communication, information transfer, fertilization, and reproduction; therefore, nullification is not an option. Insects do respond to pheromone treatment, but in a way that I call "evasion" rather than "resistance".

With the confusion method, some insects subjected to continuous, prolonged, and acute exposure to a large dose of sex pheromone may react, impeding the success of the method. In regions where insects tend to migrate or wander from field to field or area to area, the resulting pressures will tend to be counterbalanced to some extent; however, in isolated areas or over vast tracts, the stressed population will react in some way.

For example, in a given population, the composition and titer of pheromones are neither fixed nor uniform, so it is reasonable to expect that although confusion will affect most of the pest population and prevent them from mating, some of the population will nonetheless succeed in reproducing. If the characteristic that helps these individuals overcome the high concentrations of pheromone and reproduce successfully is genetic and is passed on to the next generation, this characteristic will be intensified in the surviving population. Populations may eventually develop that can no longer communicate chemically because their pheromones differ significantly, that is, the pheromone composition has changed (Figure 2). This process probably will lead to the emergence of new species. I propose to name this process "chemospeciation".


figure 2 Figure 2. Schematic representation...


Another characteristic that may change is the overall quantity of pheromone diffused by a given population. Females differ in the amount of sex pheromone they secrete. Females that secrete large amounts may attract males despite the strong pheromone background created by the confusion treatment. Such females will succeed in laying fertilized eggs, thereby increasing the general level of sex pheromone produced by succeeding generations. This expectation is borne out by preliminary findings in cotton fields subjected to confusion treatments to control the pink bollworm: A 20% increase in pheromone levels was measured in isolated fields after four years (11). We observed a similar effect in our laboratory; the amount of pheromone produced by individual females of almond moth (Ephestia cautella) after eight generations of intensive confusion doubled versus the control population (12).

Insects evidently do not remain indifferent to environmental stress; they react appropriately--but not by developing resistance and destroying the pheromone. Instead, they circumvent or evade the negative influence of the high concentrations. Regular monitoring of the changes brought about by evasion will make it possible to adapt existing confusion techniques so that they may be successfully used in the future.

A new approach
Our optimistic assessment of the potential of the confusion technique is based on new studies showing that past disappointments were largely attributable to underdosing. The old practice was to scatter small amounts (5-20 g) of expensive active pheromone per hectare, whereas today it is clear that a much larger dose--10 times larger, about 50-200 g/ha--is required to ensure a good success rate. The new philosophy is to use large quantities of cheap pheromone. Even so, the quantity of pheromone applied per unit area in a single growing season is much smaller than the total amount of chemical insecticide sprayed in several passes during the same season.

Another factor delaying the rapid dissemination of the new method is the specificity of each pheromone. The need to treat each pest individually using a tailor-made composition adds substantially to the cost. Whereas pesticides eliminate all or most kinds of pests, pheromone treatment requires the application of as many different substances and treatments as there are kinds of pests. To a farmer, this option is intolerably complicated. Efforts are being made to create a pheromone "cocktail" that would target a number of pests simultaneously in a single confusion treatment. The project is still at the research stage, and a solution will not be reached anytime soon. Even if an effective solution is not found, not using pesticides helps restore biological equilibrium, and eliminating major pests by using pheromones should promote the multiplication of the natural enemies of other pests. In U.S. cotton fields, confusion techniques are used to control the pink bollworm at the start of the season, and then the Heliothis moths--tobacco budworm (Heliothis virescens) and bollworm (Heliothis zea)--are treated with fewer treatments of pesticide later in the season, because the natural enemies of Heliothis do most of the work (13).



TO SIDEBAR: Convincing the farmer



The position adopted by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has been an important factor in promoting the use of pheromones. By licensing pheromones and waiving the requirement for prolonged testing for toxicity, teratogenicity, and other harmful activity, EPA has facilitated the implementation of pheromones. They are not pest-killing agents; they need not be regulated like pesticides. Results of mandatory tests show that pheromones already in use are nontoxic; they are, as a rule, unstable under field conditions and decompose rapidly. Some protection is required to prevent isomerization of the double bonds, oxidation, and other chemical processes (14).

The push and pull of the market
Consumer demand for pesticide-free produce is increasing steadily, pushing pheromone use forward. Government and public institutions also are exerting pressure on farmers to reduce pesticide use. Stringent laws in Europe and the United States eventually will force farmers to move away from pesticides to more environmentally friendly, less destructive pest control methods. The end result will be implementation of IPM, often using pheromones as described in this article (15).

IPM is not a goal in itself. It is a response to humanity's need to maintain a reasonable standard of living while preserving the environment. We inherited the Earth in a certain state, and we must do our best to, at the very least, preserve it. To accommodate the move to IPM, the chemical industry will inevitably have to change some pesticide production to that of other products, close production lines, cut down acquisition and sales volumes, and adopt new ways of thinking. The alternative means destroying the environment with our own hands and damaging our quality of life.


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS


REFERENCES

ACS Pubs Chem Center