Visit Incyte
Home | This Week's Contents  |  ACS Job BankSearch C&EN Online

 
Millennium Special Report
C&EN 75th Anniversary Issue
 
 
Related Stories
Discrimination among the tenured at MIT
[
C&EN, March 29, 1999]
Related Site
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
E-mail this article to a friend
Print this article
E-mail the editor
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Table of Contents
 ACS Job Bank
 News of the Week
 Cover Story
 Editor's Page
 Business
 Government & Policy
 Science/Technology
 Education
 ACS News
 Calendars
 Books
 Digital Briefs
 ACS Comments
 Career & Employment
 Special Reports
 Letters
 Awards
 Newscripts
 Nanotechnology
 What's That Stuff?
 Pharmaceutical Century

 Hot Articles
 Safety  Letters
 Chemcyclopedia

 Back Issues

 How to Subscribe
 Subscription Changes
 About C&EN
 Copyright Permission
 E-mail webmaster

NEWS OF THE WEEK
ACADEMIC
February 5,2001
Volume 79, Number 6
CENEAR 79 6 pp.8
ISSN 0009-2347
[Previous Story] [Next Story]

GENDER EQUITY: PROMISES MADE
Brighter future for women scientists pledged by nine research universities

JANICE LONG

On Jan. 29, Massachusetts Institute of Technology convened a daylong Presidents Workshop on Gender Equity in Academic Science & Engineering. Taking part were presidents, chancellors, provosts, and 25 women professors of nine top research universities.

The outcome: a statement pledging the universities to work to remove barriers facing women faculty. The presidents said: "Institutions of higher education have an obligation, both for themselves and for the nation, to fully develop and utilize all the creative talent available. We recognize that barriers still exist to the full participation of women in science and engineering."

They agreed to work toward:

  • "A faculty whose diversity reflects that of the students we educate. This goal will be pursued in part by monitoring data and sharing results annually.
  • "Equity for, and full participation by, women faculty. This goal will be pursued in part by periodic analysis of data concerning compensation and the distribution of resources to faculty.
  • "A profession, and institutions, in which individuals with family responsibilities are not disadvantaged."

And they agreed to reconvene next year to "share the specific initiatives we have undertaken to achieve these objectives."

The statement was signed by David Baltimore, president, California Institute of Technology; Harvey V. Fineberg, provost, Harvard University; Charles M. Vest, president, MIT; Harold T. Shapiro, president, Princeton University; John L. Hennessy, president, Stanford University; Robert M. Berdahl, chancellor, University of California, Berkeley; Lee C. Bollinger, president, University of Michigan; Robert L. Barchi, provost, University of Pennsylvania; and Richard Levin, president, Yale University.

"It was remarkable and important that this group could come together not just to acknowledge the problem of gender bias in the sciences but also genuinely to commit to finding solutions," comments one workshop participant, Jacqueline K. Barton, professor of chemistry at Caltech.

Impetus for the workshop was provided by a four-year-long study of gender inequities undertaken by MIT's Committee on Women Faculty in the School of Science. The study, begun in 1994 at a time when the School of Science had 15 tenured women and 194 tenured men on its faculty, led to a report issued in 1999 documenting the existence of gender inequities and a pledge by university leaders to reverse decades of discrimination (C&EN, March 29, 1999, page 6.)

"Cautiously optimistic" is how another workshop participant, Alanna Schepartz, professor of chemistry at Yale, describes her reaction to the agreement. "In my opinion," she says, "the most important goal for these institutions is to increase the number of women at the rank of full professor." These women act not just as role models for younger women, but "their collective presence deters the more subtle types of discrimination that resulted in the marginalization experienced by many women at MIT," Schepartz says.

The meeting also made it clear, she adds, that "each institution needs a watchdog--someone trustworthy who can check, on a case-to-case basis, whether space, salary, and what I refer to as 'the perks of the profession' are distributed on the basis of merit alone."

Schepartz is looking forward to next year's meeting when the nine university presidents "will all have to tell us what they actually did and what happened. Then it will be really clear who is serious and who is not."

[Previous Story] [Next Story]


Top


Chemical & Engineering News
Copyright © 2001 American Chemical Society


Visit Atofina
Home | Table of Contents | News of the Week | Cover Story
Business | Government & Policy | Science/Technology
Chemical & Engineering News
Copyright © 2001 American Chemical Society - All Right Reserved
1155 16th Street NW • Washington DC 20036 • (202) 872-4600 • (800) 227-5558


CASChemPortChemCenterPubs Page