ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
A Label-Free Potentiometric Sensor Principle for the Detection of Antibody–Antigen Interactions
My Activity
  • Open Access
Article

A Label-Free Potentiometric Sensor Principle for the Detection of Antibody–Antigen Interactions
Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

View Author Information
Pharmaceutical Development & Manufacturing Sciences, Janssen Research & Development, 2340 Beerse, Belgium
Octens BVBA, Sint-Michielskaai 34, 2000 Antwerpen Belgium
§ Janssen Infectious Diseases −Diagnostics BVBA, 2340 Beerse, Belgium
Department of Inorganic and Analytical Chemistry, University of Geneva, Quai E.-Ansermet 30, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland
Open PDFSupporting Information (1)

Analytical Chemistry

Cite this: Anal. Chem. 2013, 85, 9, 4770–4776
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/ac400514u
Published March 27, 2013

Copyright © 2013 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under these Terms of Use.

Abstract

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

We report here on a new potentiometric biosensing principle for the detection of antibody–antigen interactions at the sensing membrane surface without the need to add a label or a reporter ion to the sample solution. This is accomplished by establishing a steady-state outward flux of a marker ion from the membrane into the contacting solution. The immunobinding event at the sensing surface retards the marker ion, which results in its accumulation at the membrane surface and hence in a potential response. The ion-selective membranes were surface-modified with an antibody against respiratory syncytial virus using click chemistry between biotin molecules functionalized with a triple bond and an azide group on the modified poly (vinyl chloride) group of the membrane. The bioassay sensor was then built up with streptavidin and subsequent biotinylated antibody. A quaternary ammonium ion served as the marker ion. The observed potential was found to be modulated by the presence of respiratory syncytial virus bound on the membrane surface. The sensing architecture was confirmed with quartz crystal microbalance studies, and stir effects confirmed the kinetic nature of the marker release from the membrane. The sensitivity of the model sensor was compared to that of a commercially available point-of-care test, with promising results.

Copyright © 2013 American Chemical Society

Over the past few decades, important advancements in the field of diagnostics have been achieved as a result of the introduction of the enzyme-linked immune absorbent assay (ELISA) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) based tests, which allowed large scale automation of serological testing and the amplification of nucleic acids, respectively.
Seventy percent of the in vitro diagnostic (IVD) market is currently shaped by tests based on these technologies for infectious pathogens. (1) Despite their proven reliability, these tests are time-consuming and normally only performed in a laboratory environment. In case of acute infections, immediate availability of the results is often not possible, potentially resulting in a loss of precious time before a suitable therapy can be started.
It has been shown that respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) can cause lower respiratory tract disease (LRD) in infants and patients, for example, after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) and result in substantial early mortality. (2-6) Early disease detection and intervention, even initiated at a time when the viral load is at its highest, can improve disease outcome in previously healthy, naturally infected children. (7) Indeed, early information about the infecting agent obtained from rapid diagnostic tests has been shown to significantly alter the management of the patient’s illness, resulting in a reduction in diagnostic tests performed, reduced antibiotic use, more accurate use of antivirals and better patient management in general. (8)
Unfortunately, current point-of-care (POC) diagnostic tests do not always meet the needs of patients and doctors since only qualitative results are obtained and the limit of detection is often insufficient.
Currently, no commercial POC tests are based on potentiometric readout. Modern potentiometric sensors are established in the determination of inorganic ions in environmental (e.g., F and NH+) and clinical applications (e.g., pH, Na+, K+, Ca2+ and Cl). (9) On the other hand, electrochemical biosensors for the label-free detection of antibody–antigen interaction have been researched extensively. (10) The detection of bacteria by potentiometry has been reported (11) and early work by Rechnitz demonstrated potentiometry to be a promising tool to probe antibody–antigen interactions. (12) Still, the use of ion-selective electrodes (ISEs) as the transduction method of a label-free determination of immunobinding is in its infancy.
In this study, a potentiometric polymeric membrane electrode was investigated as a possible POC diagnostic tool for the direct detection of antibody–antigen interactions. Zero current ion fluxes across ion-selective membranes are today well-understood and are known to often be responsible for the lower detection limit of ISEs. Such fluxes have been exploited for the design of steptrodes and switchtrodes, where large potential changes around a critical concentration can be observed. (13) In the approach presented here, such an ion flux is deliberately set up across the membrane electrode. For this purpose, a marker ion is used to make the electrode responsive to its steady-state concentration at the membrane surface. As immunobinding occurs on the membrane surface, the surface binding layer imposes a resistance to mass transport of the marker ion. This results in an increase in surface concentration and hence of the measured potential. This strategy does not require the addition of a marker or reporter ion to the sample solution. Such an apparently label-free approach is potentially very attractive in view of practical handling of a biosensor in the field.
The operating and performance characteristics of the developed sensor were evaluated with RSV as a model system. Covalent membrane functionalization was achieved with a recently reported click chemistry approach. (14)

Experimental Section

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Materials

High molecular weight poly vinyl chloride (PVC), potassium tetrakis(4-chlorophenyl) borate (KTpClPB), mesamoll, streptavidin, biotin, tetrabutylammonium chloride (TBACl), bovine serum albumin (BSA), and tetrahydrofuran (THF) together with all reagents and solvents used in the synthesis were purchased from Sigma Aldrich and used without further purification. To detect RSV, we used Palivizumab (Synagis) as a monoclonal antibody recognizing the fusion (F) protein of the virus (mAb-RSV). (15) Influenza A (A2/Aichi/2/68/2) was detected with CR8020, a monoclonal antibody (mAb-Flu). (16) Monoclonal antibodies targeting HIV-1 gp-41 (MH-SVM25, ATCC) (mAb-gp41) were all cultured in house at Janssen Pharmaceutica NV.
All electrochemical measurements were performed with a two-electrode configuration using a Polyplast Pro RX (Hamilton) as a reference electrode and the polyethylene glycol (PEG)-modified PVC membrane as a working electrode. Measurements were performed at ambient temperature with a Consort D130 using a home-built data acquisition software. All potentiometry and QCM measurements were performed in phosphate buffer (Dulbecco’s Phosphate Buffered Saline, DPBS). All aqueous solutions were prepared by dissolving the appropriate salts in Milli-Q-purified distilled water (DI).

Membrane Preparation and Electrode Construction

A disk of 6 mm was cut from a microporous polypropylene fiber support (25 μm thickness, 55% porosity, 0.064 μm pore size). The disk was glued to a PVC tube of a 6 mm diameter and 1 mm wall size, by means of cyclohexanone. The tube was then dried overnight. This was followed by casting 35 μL of the membrane cocktail on top of the disk, which contained 32.5% (m/m) PVC-N3, (14) 65.5% (m/m) mesamoll, 2% (m/m) potassium tetrakis (4-chlorophenyl) borate (KTpClPB), dissolved in THF. This membrane becomes cation responsive according to the Hofmeister selectivity sequence, with more lipophilic ions preferred over less lipophilic ones.
This membrane composition was found to be the most suitable choice as a result of optimization. After full evaporation of the solvent, modification of the surface was performed by so-called click chemistry as described previously. (14)
As a result of click chemistry, the azide-modified PVC is coupled with PEG molecules which are very hydrophilic and shield the sensor surface from any interfering particle available in the sample. When attached to the PVC surface alone, PEG molecules prevent nonspecific adsorption. When modified with a biotin molecule however, resultant PEG–Biotin linker (PEG–B) can be used to attach the recognition elements on the sensor surface by using the high affinity streptavidin–biotin complex. With dependance on the type of biotinylated antibody selected, a particular sensor can be made to be specific or nonspecific for a given target molecule. The following two surface modification cocktails (i.e., PEG, PEG–B) were used in preparing the electrodes.
PEG:CuSO4·5H2O [46 mg (0.19 mmol)] and ascorbic acid [167 mg (0.95 mmol)] in 6 mL of water, PEG derivative 5 mg (0.02 mmol), (14) first dissolved in 0.25 mL THF, then added to the 6 mL H2O.
PEG–biotin:CuSO4·5H2O [46 mg (0.19 mmol)] and ascorbic acid [167 mg (0.95 mmol)] in 6 mL of water, biotin–PEG derivative 10 mg (0.02 mmol), (14) first dissolved in 0.25 mL THF, and then added to the 6 mL H2O.
All electrodes were stored in a humid environment over 24 h. After this, each electrode was rinsed with distilled water. The inside of the tube was filled with 500 μL of a 4 mg/mL TBACl in DPBS. The electrical connection was provided by means of a silver wire. The electrodes were conditioned in DPBS for 48 h prior to measurement under constant stirring (300 rpm) to hydrate the membrane.

Electrode Membrane Surface Modification

The current setup allows working in 4 independent cells. In each measurement cell, one can place up to six electrodes and a reference electrode in 5 mL DPBS under constant stirring at 150 rpm. After reaching a stable potential (i.e., potential drift less than 1 mV/10 min), the electrodes were exposed to streptavidin for 1 h under constant stirring at a final concentration of 2.5 μg/mL.
After each incubation step, DPBS was refreshed. Once a stable baseline potential was established, which usually took up to 30 min, electrodes were incubated for 1 h with biotinylated specific or nonspecific antibodies with a final concentration 2.5 μg/mL. Before exposing the electrodes to the antigen, the buffer was refreshed.

Sensor Working Mechanism

The mechanism of action is based on the disturbance of the internal marker ion (TBACl) flux as a result of target molecules binding on the sensor surface. As the membrane is very sensitive to the marker ion that leaches out from the internal solution to the sample side where the virus is present, the binding of the virus to the antibody disturbs the flux of the marker ion, changing its local concentration in the vicinity of the sensor, which then results in a measurable potential change at the sensor. Schematic representation of the sensing principle is depicted in Figure 1.

Quartz Crystal Microbalance Measurements

QCM experiments were carried out with a Q-Sense E4 (Gothenburg, Sweden) instrument in a flow through cell to investigate whether the click chemistry modification, antibody interaction, and virus adherence were executed in accordance with the expected electrode architecture. In all QCM experiments, gold chips uniformly spin-coated with the same PVC membrane cocktail used for the potentiometric sensor. Resulting membrane layer thickness was monitored with ellipsometry and only those with desired thickness (around 100 nm) were used for the QCM measurements.

Western Blot Analysis and ELISA

The affinities of the mAb-RSV and mAb-gp41 (control) antibodies against the target antigen of interest (RSV) were tested with Western Blot analysis. The binding between the anti-RSV F protein antibody and RSV was tested by means of ELISA. In these tests, the signal readout was monitored by varying the antibody concentration while keeping the viral concentration constant and vice versa.

Potentiometric Measurements

Two sets of potentiometric measurements were performed, measurements to support the working mechanism and the actual determination of antibody–antigen interactions.

Measurements Supporting the Mechanism of Action

The functionality of the electrodes, based on the outflux of the marker ion, was first tested based on a potentiometric stir effect. As the elevation of the local concentration of TBACl in the sample side is precluded as a result of constant stirring, when the stirring is absent, the concentration is expected to increase. Additionally, the mechanism of action (MOA) was tested experimentally during electrode build-up since the addition of streptavidin and antibody binding on the sensor surface are also expected to yield a signal.
Experiments were conducted in which electrodes without surface modification were exposed to BSA to ascertain the MOA. In these experiments, ion strength of the marker ion was kept constant at the same concentration on both sides of the ISE membrane. BSA solutions were tested in the presence of interfering ions.

Measurement of Virus

Electrodes were exposed to four consecutive virus spikes containing 103 PFU (plaque forming units)/mL each. The time between expositions was 10 min. A POC test, Binax NOW RSV, (17) was used to assess the sensitivity of the proposed sensor. The Binax NOW RSV is a membrane-based immunochromatographic technique designed to detect RSV fusion protein antigen in nasal washes and nasopharyngeal swab specimens. The test is based on anti-RSV antibodies conjugated to visualizing particles and adsorbed onto a nitrocellulose membrane to form a sample line. Upon the addition of the virus sample to the test strip, and a 15 min incubation period, the signal readout was done. In all potentiometric and parallel tests performed using Binax NOW, the identical virus batches were used.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Schematic showing signal build-up as a result of the disturbance of the ion flux set up across the membrane electrode. A marker ion (TBACl) is used to make the electrode responsive to its steady-state concentration at the membrane surface. The internal marker ion leaches out from the sample side, reaching an (A) equilibrium and (B) antigen–antibody binding occurs on the membrane surface, resulting in an increase in surface concentration and hence of the (C) measured potential, which eventually (D) levels off.

Theory

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The sensing principle, put forward here for the first time, involves the continuous release of a label ion from an ion-selective membrane into the aqueous solution. The system is here understood by a steady-state concentration profile across the membrane that is driven by the extraction of marker ion salt at the backside of the membrane. A surface confined immunoreaction is here understood to result in an intermediate diffusion layer between the membrane and the aqueous diffusion layer. The concentration profile across the three diffusion layers is schematically shown in Figure 2.
The flux of marker ion j across the membrane is described by Fick’s first law as(1)where the phase labels are shown as m superscripts, Djm is the diffusion coefficient, cjmm) the molar concentration at the backside of the membrane (position δm, see Figure 2), cjm(0) its concentration at the sample side of the membrane, and δm is the membrane thickness.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Schematic representation of the sensing principle and the symbols used to describe the concentration changes at each position (layer thicknesses are not to scale). A concentration gradient of a marker ion across the sensing membrane results in its continuous release into the sample solution. As a biorecognition event takes place, the concentration at the membrane surface is increased owing to the build-up of a diffusion barrier, resulting in a potential increase. The dotted line in the binding layer indicates the concentration gradient in the absence of a binding event.

The flux across the diffusion layer where immunoreaction occurs is written in analogy as(2)where position 0 refers to the membrane surface and δd to the end of this intermediate layer in contact with the sample solution. Finally, the flux across the aqueous diffusion layer is written similarly as(3)where δd is the aqueous diffusion layer thickness at steady state. It can be altered by the stirring rate of the solution. At position d, we assume equilibrium and since both diffusion layers are aqueous we find cjaqd) = cjdd). Furthermore, ion-exchange with other sample cations is excluded, and we approximate the concentration of marker ion at position 0 of the membrane with the ion-exchanger concentration, cjm(0) = cRm.
The observed boundary potential of the ion-selective membrane is a function of the concentrations (strictly, activities) across the aqueous–membrane interface and is written here as(4)where Δaqmϕj0 is the standard potential of ion transfer across this interface (a constant) and R, T, and F have their established meanings. The charge of the marker ion, zj, is here taken as 1. At steady-state, all three fluxes in eqs 1, 2, and 3 are equal. Eliminating cjd(d) and Jj, solving the result for cjd(0), and inserting it into eq 4 gives the potential response as(5)
In a label-free sensing approach, one aims to avoid addition of the label to the sample solution. Consequently, we use cjaq(bulk) = 0 and keep the diffusion coefficients and the membrane thickness and compositions constant to obtain from eq 5:(6)where A is a constant. A reduction of the apparent diffusion coefficient in the surface-confined layer, for example by a surface blocking event, results in a potential increase. This change is a direct function of the diffusion coefficient and the additional diffusion layer thickness. Figure 3 illustrates expected potential changes on the basis of eq 6 as a function of binding layer thickness and reduction in diffusion coefficient in that layer.
Convective stirring of the solution is expected to give smaller signals (reduced value of δaq). In accordance with Figure 3, surface binding events on the scale of a few hundred nanometers are detectable with this approach if it induces an important retardation of the marker ion.

Results and Discussion

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Figure 4 shows the QCM data acquired from different sensors. The signal at the top panel was acquired from a gold crystal coated with an antibody recognizing RSV F protein, whereas the middle was from a gold crystal modified with an antibody recognizing HIV-1 gp41 protein (as a negative control). The bottom signal was obtained from a crystal coated only with PEG, serving as another control in the experiments. This experiment confirms the build-up of the immunoreagents at the ion-selective membrane surface. The exposure of the biotinylated membranes to streptavidin and the subsequent step of binding the biotinylated antibodies were clearly visualized by QCM. PEG-modified membranes (bottom) show no response to streptavidin, as expected. As can be seen from Figure 4, a decrease in the resonance frequency upon exposure to 103 PFU RSV was observed only for the specific electrode (top). This indicates that the sensor surface was modified as desired.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Calculated potential changes for the surface binding event at the electrode surface that slows the diffusion of the marker ion (logarithmic diffusion coefficient on the x axis) according to eq 6. Diffusion coefficient in the aqueous phase is taken as Djaq = 10–5 cm2 s–1. Stirring the solution decreases the aqueous diffusion layer and hence the potential response.

The specificity of the anti-RSV F antibody was tested with Western Blot analysis. The data confirmed a specific interaction of this antibody with the denatured F1 part of the RSV F protein (Figure 5, left). The binding between the anti-RSV F antibody and the F protein in its native pretriggered conformation was also tested by means of an ELISA. In these experiments, the signal readout was monitored by varying the Ab concentration 0.1–10 (μg/mL), while keeping the viral concentration constant at 106 PFU and vice versa (i.e., primary Ab of 10 μg/mL, RSV of 103–106 PFU) (Figure 5, right). As seen in Figure 5 (right, bottom), the signal increases when the antibody or the virus concentration are elevated, indicating an interaction between the two.
The proposed response mechanism of the potentiometric biosensor principle was initially confirmed based on a stir-effect. As seen in Figure 6A, when the solution was stirred, the signal read-out was low. This is a consequence of the fact that constant stirring prevented the ion flux building up the local concentration, as predicted by eq 6. On the other hand, when sample stirring was turned off, the potential increased, owing to the increasing concentration of marker ion at the sensor surface.
The mechanism laid out in the theoretical part was independently supported with BSA as a model analyte. In this experiment two different electrodes, placed in the same measurement cell, were exposed to BSA to test their responses to any possible interaction with this molecule (Figure 6B). In this case the membrane consisted of a PVC, which was not modified with any antibody. The electrodes were first exposed to a BSA filtrate (i.e., not containing any BSA) to confirm the lack of potential increase in the absence of BSA and to rule out any impact of sample impurities. Indeed, no potential increase was observed in response to the BSA filtrate (data not shown). This was followed by a stir effect, as shown in Figure 6B, to test electrode response according to eq 5. Signals increased when the stirring was off, whereas they all decreased as the stirring was on. A BSA spike of (50 mg/mL) caused electrode signals to rise. The fact that BSA filtrate injections did not give rise to a measurable potential change indicates that the observed signal changes were brought about by the BSA binding on the membrane surface. It is important to emphasize that no response was observed when the marker ion was already present in the sample solution. This is in accordance with the principle set forth above and indicates that a potential response is indeed induced by retarding the marker ion and increasing its accumulation at the membrane surface. Figure 7 (top) presents the experimental data on RSV detection, using a set of (A) specific electrodes and three sets of control electrodes were used [i.e., total number of 39 electrodes, 16 of which were specific (A)]. As seen in this graph, while (B, C, D) control groups show no response to the lowest virus concentration of 10 PFU/mL, the (A) specific electrodes respond to the virus. A schematic of different sensor architectures can be seen in Figure 7 (bottom).

Figure 4

Figure 4. QCM data showing the change in resonance frequency occurring only for the (A) specific electrode (top) upon RSV exposure, whereas the (B) middle (modified with an antibody recognizing HIV-1 gp41 protein as a negative control) and the (C) bottom signal (coated only with PEG) show no response to RSV spikes. (A and B) respond to streptavidin and antibody injections as a result of streptavidin binding to the biotinylated surfaces (PEG-B) and subsequent biotinylated antibody binding to streptavidin while (C) PEG electrode shows no response, as expected.

Figure 5

Figure 5. Western Blot and ELISA tests showing the interaction between the anti-RSV F antibody and the F protein in its denatured and native pretriggered conformation. Dark-blue and light blue represent the responses with and without mAb-RSV primary antibody, respectively.

Figure 6

Figure 6. (A) Stir effect supporting the proposed mechanism of action. The constant stirring prevented the ion flux from building up the local concentration, which was increased when the stirring was off. (B) Clear signal responses, following stir-effect, recorded potentiometrically from a set of two electrodes in the same measurement cell as a result of BSA binding to the sensor surface. Potential of each electrode, indicated by red and blue, respectively, increases after BSA injection.

Among three control groups (B, C, and D), two control groups (C and D) showed no response to 10 and 100 PFU/mL RSV injections. It is also observed in Figure 7 that the difference in signal response between the specific (A) and control electrodes (B, C, D) becomes larger as the virus concentration increases (e.g., 1000 PFU/mL). It should be noted that control group B was identical to the specific set A except for the monoclonal antibody used (i.e., mAb-gp41 instead of mAb-RSV), so as to ascertain that different signal responses correspond to the electrode specificity. Additionally, control groups C and D were employed to monitor any interaction which might be due to mAbs binding on the membrane surface despite the PEG layers used.

Figure 7

Figure 7. Data acquired from (A) specific and (B, C, D) a group of 3 types of nonspecific (i.e., control) electrodes. The specific electrode was a PEG-B membrane modified with mAb-RSV, whereas (B) the first control was a PEG-B membrane modified with mAb-gp41. The other two sets were controls based on PEG-only membranes treated with mAb-RSV and mAb-gp41 recognition elements, respectively.

A comparison of the potentiometric signal readouts of a specific and nonspecific electrode pair recorded within the same measurement cell is given in Figure 8. As shown in this figure, the signal amplitude of the specific electrode increases as the amount of viral particles in the cell is increased. The potential recorded from the nonspecific electrode follows a steady baseline except for the highest viral load. This is probably due to nonspecific interactions (i.e., background signal) as a result of very high concentration of viral particles the measurement cell. As these specific and nonspecific electrodes were exposed to the same viral loading, different signal responses correspond to the electrode specificity.

Figure 8

Figure 8. A comparison of the potentiometric signal readouts of an electrode treated with mAb-RSV (solid line) and a control electrode with mAb-gp 41 (dashed line), recorded within the same measurement cell. The signal amplitude of the specific electrode increases as the virus concentration in the cell is increased, whereas that from the nonspecific electrode follows a steady baseline except for the highest viral load.

To evaluate the sensitivity of our sensor, we investigated the viral concentrations in batch mode with an orthogonal technique, quantitative reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). The detection limit of the proposed sensor system was found to be approximately 3 logarithmic units higher than that of the qRT-PCR (data not shown).
We used identical RSV batches in order to compare the response and sensitivity of the proposed sensor with the commercial RSV test. Table 1 shows the responses recorded from a pair of specific (i.e., PEG-B membranes modified with mAb-RSV) as well as nonspecific electrodes (i.e., PEG-B membranes modified with mAb-gp41) to a set of RSV spikes of varying concentrations. Plus and minus signs indicate the presence and the absence of a signal response, respectively. As shown in Table 1, only the electrode modified with mAb-RSV responded to viral concentrations of 103 and 104 PFU. It should be emphasized that nonspecific electrodes and the Binax NOW test started responding to the RSV virus only at a viral load of 105 PFU/mL.
Table 1. A Summary of Signal Responses Recorded from a Pair of Electrodes to a Set of RSV Spikes Containing Varying Amounts of Viral Particlesa
RSV (PFU)PEG-B Ab-RSVPEG-B Ab-gp41Binax NOW
103+
104+
105+++
5 × 105+++
a

Plus and minus signs indicate the presence and absence of a signal, respectively. Only the electrode treated with mAb-RSV responded to virus concentrations of 103 and 104 PFU.

We conducted a limited number of preliminary experiments on the detection of Influenza A (A2/Aichi/2/68/2) to test the universality of the developed sensor by using CR8020 mAbs and mAb-gp41 (i.e., control). A design of experiment (DOE) was conducted with a total of eight cells each containing three specific and three nonspecific electrodes (i.e., 48 electrodes in total). Electrodes were exposed to Influenza A virus and to RSV (see Figure 2S of the Supporting Information). The majority of the electrodes were found to be clearly more responsive to Influenza A virus than to RSV, although nonspecific interactions were also observed, especially at high virus concentrations.

Conclusions

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

A new potentiometric biosensor principle has been evaluated to explore the concept of modulating the mass transport of a marker ion to detect antigen–antibody interactions at the ion-selective membrane surface. This was demonstrated by an infectious disease model for RSV. The proposed mechanism of action was evidenced by potentiometric experiments. The electrode architecture was verified with QCM measurements.
Most electrochemical measurement systems require the addition of an indicator ion to the sample solution (e.g., Ca2+) (18) or a redox couple (e.g., amperometry) to recognize the antibody–antigen interaction. In this sensor principle, the marker ion is delivered by the membrane in direction of the analyte solution by diffusion through the membrane. Consequently, the evaluated sensing system renders label-free detection of antibody–antigen interactions possible. This can in turn make the sample preparation process less cumbersome for point-of-care applications.
The sensor principle requires effective coverage of the sensing surface upon immunoreaction. The area of the current sensor is very large (a few millimeters in diameter) compared to the 100 nm virus one wishes to detect. Potentiometric microelectrodes with size ranges in the submicrometer range have been known for many years (19) and should provide a much more favorable membrane to virus area than the systems studied here. Miniaturization of the sensing system is expected to increase the sensitivity of the sensor and hence lower the limit of detection (LOD).
The delivery of the target molecules to the sensor surface achieved by stirring in the current study can be facilitated by using a microfluidic channel which can transport the target molecule to the sensor surface more effectively.
Despite the promising results presented in this work, nonspecific interactions on the polymer surface remain a potential limitation of the current design. Signals recorded from PEG-only membranes treated with mAb-RSV (Figure 7) indicate a suboptimum shielding of the membrane surface which needs to be overcome before the technique can be applied in real application with more complex biological samples.
Although not investigated in our current study, the Ab isotype (e.g., use of IgG versus IgM) may have an impact on the sensitivity of the sensor as a result of different avidity of the Abs. Using multimeric antibodies as compared to their monomeric counterparts could improve sensitivity as more antigen binding possibly results in more pronounced changes of the ion flux at the surface of the sensor. Additionally, the size of the antigen of interest can affect signal transfer as larger molecules can be expected to cause larger flux changes of the marker ion the membrane surface and hence yield larger signals.
This early study aimed at exploring the concept of an incorporated marker ion flux in potentiometric ion-selective sensors as a new biosensor approach. The data confirm the feasibility of detecting antibody–antigen interactions by potentiometry. To our knowledge, this is the first reported use of potentiometry on the basis of passive ion fluxes in probing antibody–antigen interactions. Such an apparently label-free approach may become an attractive platform for future progress in bioaffinity sensor research.

Supporting Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Synthetic details and additional experiments. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

  • Corresponding Author
    • Eric Bakker - Department of Inorganic and Analytical Chemistry, University of Geneva, Quai E.-Ansermet 30, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland Email: [email protected]
  • Authors
    • Mahir S. Ozdemir - Pharmaceutical Development & Manufacturing Sciences, Janssen Research & Development, 2340 Beerse, Belgium
    • Marcin Marczak - Pharmaceutical Development & Manufacturing Sciences, Janssen Research & Development, 2340 Beerse, Belgium
    • Hugo Bohets - Octens BVBA, Sint-Michielskaai 34, 2000 Antwerpen Belgium
    • Kristien Bonroy - Janssen Infectious Diseases −Diagnostics BVBA, 2340 Beerse, Belgium
    • Dirk Roymans - Janssen Infectious Diseases −Diagnostics BVBA, 2340 Beerse, Belgium
    • Lieven Stuyver - Janssen Infectious Diseases −Diagnostics BVBA, 2340 Beerse, Belgium
    • Koen Vanhoutte - Pharmaceutical Development & Manufacturing Sciences, Janssen Research & Development, 2340 Beerse, Belgium
    • Marcin Pawlak - Department of Inorganic and Analytical Chemistry, University of Geneva, Quai E.-Ansermet 30, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland
  • Notes
    The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgment

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The authors thank the IWT (Innovatie door Wetenschap en Technologie) for financial support (WTO: 080329).

References

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article references 19 other publications.

  1. 1

    Kalorama Information Worldwide POC Diagnostic Test Markets.

  2. 2
    Martino, R.; Porras, R. P.; Rabella, N.; Williams, J. V.; Rámila, E.; Margall, N.; Labeaga, R.; Crowe, J. E., Jr.; Coll, P.; Sierra, J. Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. 2005, 11, 781 796
  3. 3
    Nichols, W. G.; Gooley, T.; Boeckh, M. Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. 2001, 7, 11S 15S
  4. 4
    Khanna, N.; Widmer, A. F.; Decker, M.; Steffen, I.; Halter, J.; Heim, D.; Weisser, M.; Gratwohl, A.; Fluckiger, U.; Hirsch, H. H. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2008, 46, 402 412
  5. 5
    McCarthy, A. J.; Kingman, H. M; Kelly, C.; Taylor, G. S.; Caul, E. O.; Grier, D.; Moppett, J.; Foot, A. B.; Cornish, J. M.; Oakhill, A.; Steward, C .G.; Pamphilon, D. H.; Marks, D. I. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1999, 24, 1315 1322
  6. 6
    Erard, V.; Chien, J. W.; Kim, H .W.; Nichols, W. G.; Flowers, M. E.; Martin, P. J.; Corey, L.; Boeckh, M. J. Infect. Dis. 2006, 193, 1619 1625
  7. 7
    Saleeby, C. M.; Bush, A. J.; Harrison, L. M.; Aitken, J. A.; DeVincenzo, J. P. J. Infect. Dis. 2011, 204, 996 1002
  8. 8
    Bonner, A. B.; Monroe, K. W.; Talley, L .I.; Klasner, A. E.; Kimberlin, D. W. Pediatrics 2003, 112, 363 7
  9. 9
    Bakker, E.; Pretsch, E. Chemistry 2002, 74, 420A 426A
  10. 10
    Vestergaard, M.; Kagan, K.; Tamiya, E. Sensors 2007, 7, 3442 3458
  11. 11
    Zelada-Guillen, G. A.; Riu, J.; Duzgun, A.; Rius, F. X. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 7334 7337
  12. 12
    D’Orazio, P.; Rechnitz, G. A. Anal. Chim. Acta 1979, 109, 25 31
  13. 13
    Vigassy, T.; Morf, W. E.; Badertscher, M.; Ceresa, A.; De Rooij, N. F.; Pretsch, E. Sens. Actuators, B 2001, 76, 477 482
  14. 14
    Pawlak, M.; Mistlberger, G.; Bakker, E. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 12796 12801
  15. 15
    Johnson, S.; Oliver, C.; Prince, G .A.; Hemming, V. G.; Pfarr, D. S.; Wang, S. C.; Dormitzer, M.; O’Grady, J.; Koenig, S.; Tamura, J. K.; Woods, R.; Bansal, G.; Couchenour, D.; Tsao, E.; Hall, W .C.; Young, J. F. J. Infect. Dis. 1997, 176, 1215 1224
  16. 16
    Ekiert, D .C.; Friesen, R. H .E.; Bhabha, G.; Kwaks, T.; Jongeneelen, M.; Yu, W.; Ophorst, C.; Cox, F.; Korse, H. J. W. M.; Brandenburg, B.; Vogels, R.; Brakenhoff, J .P. J.; Kompier, R.; Koldijk, M. H.; Cornelissen, L .A. H. M.; Poon, L .L. M.; Peiris, M.; Koudstaal, W.; Wilson, I. A.; Goudsmit, J. Science 2011, 333, 843 850
  17. 17
    binax® NOW® RSV Rapid Test; Binax Inc.: Portland, Maine, 1998; 6.
  18. 18
    Xu, Y.; Bakker, E. Langmuir 2009, 25, 568 573
  19. 19
    Manz, A.; Simon, W. Anal. Chem. 1987, 59, 74 79

Cited By

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!
Citation Statements
Explore this article's citation statements on scite.ai

This article is cited by 51 publications.

  1. Kaikai Wang, Rongning Liang, Wei Qin. Surface Blocking-Based Potentiometric Biosensor for Detection of E. coli ATCC 15597 Using Phage MS2 as a Receptor. ACS Sensors 2024, 9 (11) , 6157-6166. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssensors.4c02004
  2. Pattarachaya Preechakasedkit, Chaiwat Pulsrikarn, Suphachai Nuanualsuwan, Nawarat Rattanadilok Na Phuket, Daniel Citterio, Nipapan Ruecha. Label-Free Detection of Waterborne Pathogens Using an All-Solid-State Laser-Induced Graphene Potentiometric Ion Flux Immunosensor. Analytical Chemistry 2024, 96 (38) , 15476-15483. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.4c03607
  3. Junhao Wang, Huihui Zhou, Rongning Liang, Wei Qin. Chronopotentiometric Nanopore Sensor Based on a Stimulus-Responsive Molecularly Imprinted Polymer for Label-Free Dual-Biomarker Detection. Analytical Chemistry 2024, 96 (23) , 9370-9378. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.3c05817
  4. Zhe Liu, Tianjia Jiang, Wei Qin. Polymeric Membrane Marine Sensors with a Regenerable Antibiofouling Coating Based on Surface Modification of a Dual-Functionalized Magnetic Composite. Analytical Chemistry 2022, 94 (34) , 11916-11924. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.2c02672
  5. Medhat A. Al-Ghobashy, Ahmed H. Nadim, Ghada M. El-Sayed, Marianne Nebsen. Label-Free Potentiometric Ion Flux Immunosensor for Determination of Recombinant Human Myelin Basic Protein: Application to Downstream Purification from Transgenic Milk. ACS Sensors 2019, 4 (2) , 413-420. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssensors.8b01315
  6. Scott A. Walper, Guillermo Lasarte Aragonés, Kim E. Sapsford, Carl W. Brown III, Clare E. Rowland, Joyce C. Breger, Igor L. Medintz. Detecting Biothreat Agents: From Current Diagnostics to Developing Sensor Technologies. ACS Sensors 2018, 3 (10) , 1894-2024. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssensors.8b00420
  7. Jiawang Ding, Nana Yu, Xuedong Wang, and Wei Qin . Sequential and Selective Detection of Two Molecules with a Single Solid-Contact Chronopotentiometric Ion-Selective Electrode. Analytical Chemistry 2018, 90 (3) , 1734-1739. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.7b03522
  8. Eric Bakker . Electroanalysis with Membrane Electrodes and Liquid–Liquid Interfaces. Analytical Chemistry 2016, 88 (1) , 395-413. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.5b04034
  9. Yijia Wang, Xiaoning Bai, Wei Wen, Xiuhua Zhang, and Shengfu Wang . Ultrasensitive Electrochemical Biosensor for HIV Gene Detection Based on Graphene Stabilized Gold Nanoclusters with Exonuclease Amplification. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2015, 7 (33) , 18872-18879. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b05857
  10. Ezat Hamidi-Asl, Devin Daems, Karolien De Wael, Guy Van Camp, and Luc J. Nagels . Concentration-Related Response Potentiometric Titrations To Study the Interaction of Small Molecules with Large Biomolecules. Analytical Chemistry 2014, 86 (24) , 12243-12249. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac503385x
  11. Mohammad Tavakkoli, Sai R. Panuganti, Francisco M. Vargas, Vahid Taghikhani, Mahmoud Reza Pishvaie, and Walter G. Chapman . Asphaltene Deposition in Different Depositing Environments: Part 1. Model Oil. Energy & Fuels 2014, 28 (3) , 1617-1628. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef401857t
  12. Jiawang Ding, Xuewei Wang, and Wei Qin . Pulsed Galvanostatic Control of a Polymeric Membrane Ion-Selective Electrode for Potentiometric Immunoassays. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2013, 5 (19) , 9488-9493. https://doi.org/10.1021/am402245f
  13. Dianping Tang, Bing Zhang, Juan Tang, Li Hou, and Guonan Chen . Displacement-type Quartz Crystal Microbalance Immunosensing Platform for Ultrasensitive Monitoring of Small Molecular Toxins. Analytical Chemistry 2013, 85 (14) , 6958-6966. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac401599t
  14. Pradip Kar, Mukul Deo, Leena Priya, Nirgaman Bage, Sadhana Kundu. Electrical biosensors. 2025, 137-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-21658-9.00022-X
  15. Luca Salvigni, Prem Depan Nayak, Anil Koklu, Danilo Arcangeli, Johana Uribe, Adel Hama, Raphaela Silva, Tania Cecilia Hidalgo Castillo, Sophie Griggs, Adam Marks, Iain McCulloch, Sahika Inal. Reconfiguration of organic electrochemical transistors for high-accuracy potentiometric sensing. Nature Communications 2024, 15 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-50792-1
  16. Tallita Stéfanne e Silva, Guilherme Ramos Oliveira e Freitas, Lucas Franco Ferreira, Diego Leoni Franco. Development of a label-free impedimetric immunosensor for the detection of respiratory syncytial virus. Journal of Solid State Electrochemistry 2024, 28 (11) , 4015-4027. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10008-024-05999-z
  17. Ranxin Wang, Linhui Lv, Ke Qu. Potentiometric sensing of glycoprotein: targeting alpha-fetoprotein detection. New Journal of Chemistry 2024, 48 (38) , 16820-16827. https://doi.org/10.1039/D4NJ03024A
  18. Kaikai Wang, Rongning Liang, Wei Qin. Enhancing the sensitivity of polymeric membrane polycation-sensitive electrodes by surface modification of a polydopamine nanolayer. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical 2024, 405 , 135310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2024.135310
  19. Tahsin Ertaş, Bircan Dinç, Recep Üstünsoy, Hülya Eraslan, Ali Fuat Ergenç, Muhammet Bektaş. Novel electrochemical biosensor for Escherichia coli using gold-coated tungsten wires and antibody functionalized short multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Instrumentation Science & Technology 2024, 52 (2) , 109-124. https://doi.org/10.1080/10739149.2023.2222801
  20. Moushira M. Mostafa, Ghada A. Sedik, Eman S. Elzanfaly, Ahmed H. Nadim. Development of potentiometric immunosensor for determination of live attenuated Varicella Vaccine: Potency and stability studies. Analytical Biochemistry 2023, 683 , 115367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ab.2023.115367
  21. Shirlley E. Martínez Tolibia, Andrés Galdámez-Martínez, Rafael A. Salinas, Ateet Dutt. Anticipating Challenges in Optical Nanobiosensors for Global Detection of Respiratory Viruses and Emerging Threats. ECS Sensors Plus 2023, 2 (4) , 044601. https://doi.org/10.1149/2754-2726/ad08d5
  22. Jyoti Bala Kaushal, Pratima Raut, Sanjay Kumar. Organic Electronics in Biosensing: A Promising Frontier for Medical and Environmental Applications. Biosensors 2023, 13 (11) , 976. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios13110976
  23. Mingyi Ma, Li He, Xiaoxue Shi, Yanchao Wang, Hong Hai, Xiaoping Wei. Ultrasensitive detection of HIV DNA using an electrochemical biosensor with branched DNA amplification. International Journal of Electrochemical Science 2023, 18 (10) , 100286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijoes.2023.100286
  24. Gabriel J. Mattos, Eric Bakker. Integrated enzyme-linked immunosensor with biofunctionalized ion-selective membranes by pulstrode delivery of substrate. Biosensors and Bioelectronics: X 2023, 14 , 100351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosx.2023.100351
  25. Sara Nemati, Farzaneh Shalileh, Hamed Mirjalali, Kobra Omidfar. Toward waterborne protozoa detection using sensing technologies. Frontiers in Microbiology 2023, 14 https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1118164
  26. Zhongzheng Wang, Anthony Wall, Alan O’Riordan, Daniel O’Hare, Gerardo Molina Salgado, Ivan O’Connell. Models and Interfaces for Electrochemical Sensors: Architectures and Implementations. 2023, 79-103. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28912-5_5
  27. Rajni Sharma, Marzieh Geranpayehvaghei, Fatemeh Ejeian, Amir Razmjou, Mohsen Asadnia. Recent advances in polymeric nanostructured ion selective membranes for biomedical applications. Talanta 2021, 235 , 122815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2021.122815
  28. Tianyi Chen, Pengfei Sha, Yiwei Xu, Xuefei Su, Daqi Chen, Nan Li, Guang Li, Ruifen Hu. Online pH monitoring based on a wireless electrodeless quartz crystal microbalance with dissipation. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical 2021, 331 , 112952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2021.112952
  29. Hend S. Magar, Rabeay Y. A. Hassan, Ashok Mulchandani. Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS): Principles, Construction, and Biosensing Applications. Sensors 2021, 21 (19) , 6578. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21196578
  30. Ahmed H. Nadim, May A. Abd El-Aal, Medhat A. Al-Ghobashy, Yasser S. El-Saharty. Optimization of polydopamine imprinted polymer for label free sensitive potentiometric determination of proteins: Application to recombinant human erythropoietin sensing in different matrices. Microchemical Journal 2021, 167 , 106333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2021.106333
  31. Ahmed H. Nadim, May A. Abd El-Aal, Medhat A. Al-Ghobashy, Yasser S. El-Saharty. Facile imprinted polymer for label-free highly selective potentiometric sensing of proteins: case of recombinant human erythropoietin. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry 2021, 413 (14) , 3611-3623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-021-03325-4
  32. Shuwen Liu, Jiawang Ding, Wei Qin. Chronopotentiometric aptasensing with signal amplification based on enzyme-catalyzed surface polymerization. Chemical Communications 2020, 56 (87) , 13355-13358. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0CC05745B
  33. Wioleta Białobrzeska, Daniel Firganek, Maciej Czerkies, Tomasz Lipniacki, Marta Skwarecka, Karolina Dziąbowska, Zofia Cebula, Natalia Malinowska, Daniel Bigus, Ewelina Bięga, Krzysztof Pyrć, Katarzyna Pala, Sabina Żołędowska, Dawid Nidzworski. Electrochemical Immunosensors Based on Screen-Printed Gold and Glassy Carbon Electrodes: Comparison of Performance for Respiratory Syncytial Virus Detection. Biosensors 2020, 10 (11) , 175. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios10110175
  34. Jiawang Ding, Wei Qin. Recent advances in potentiometric biosensors. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry 2020, 124 , 115803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2019.115803
  35. Baizhu Lin, Yunji Yi, Yue Cao, Jiawen Lv, Yue Yang, Fei Wang, Xiaoqiang Sun, Daming Zhang. A Polymer Asymmetric Mach–Zehnder Interferometer Sensor Model Based on Electrode Thermal Writing Waveguide Technology. Micromachines 2019, 10 (10) , 628. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi10100628
  36. Nádia F.D. Silva, Cláudio M.R. Almeida, Júlia M.C.S. Magalhães, Maria P. Gonçalves, Cristina Freire, Cristina Delerue-Matos. Development of a disposable paper-based potentiometric immunosensor for real-time detection of a foodborne pathogen. Biosensors and Bioelectronics 2019, 141 , 111317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2019.111317
  37. Nádia F.D. Silva, Júlia M.C.S. Magalhães, M. Fátima Barroso, Teresa Oliva-Teles, Cristina Freire, Cristina Delerue-Matos. In situ formation of gold nanoparticles in polymer inclusion membrane: Application as platform in a label-free potentiometric immunosensor for Salmonella typhimurium detection. Talanta 2019, 194 , 134-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2018.10.024
  38. Meng-Yen Tsai, Niamh Creedon, Eleanor Brightbill, Spyridon Pavlidis, Billyde Brown, Darren W. Gray, Niall Shields, Ríona Sayers, Mark H. Mooney, Alan O'Riordan, Eric M. Vogel. Direct correlation between potentiometric and impedance biosensing of antibody-antigen interactions using an integrated system. Applied Physics Letters 2017, 111 (7) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4986190
  39. Rongning Liang, Jiawang Ding, Shengshuai Gao, Wei Qin. Mussel‐Inspired Surface‐Imprinted Sensors for Potentiometric Label‐Free Detection of Biological Species. Angewandte Chemie 2017, 129 (24) , 6937-6941. https://doi.org/10.1002/ange.201701892
  40. Rongning Liang, Jiawang Ding, Shengshuai Gao, Wei Qin. Mussel‐Inspired Surface‐Imprinted Sensors for Potentiometric Label‐Free Detection of Biological Species. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 2017, 56 (24) , 6833-6837. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201701892
  41. Carlos M. Cruz, Mariano Ortega‐Muñoz, F. Javier López‐Jaramillo, Fernando Hernández‐Mateo, Victor Blanco, Francisco Santoyo‐González. Vinyl Sulfonates: A Click Function for Coupling‐and‐Decoupling Chemistry and their Applications. Advanced Synthesis & Catalysis 2016, 358 (21) , 3394-3413. https://doi.org/10.1002/adsc.201600628
  42. Nana Yu, Jiawang Ding, Wenwei Wang, Xuedong Wang, Wei Qin. Pulsed galvanostatic control of a solid-contact ion-selective electrode for potentiometric biosensing of microcystin-LR. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical 2016, 230 , 785-790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2016.02.121
  43. Kyeonghye Guk, Hyeran Kim, Yujeong Kim, Taejoon Kang, Eun-Kyung Lim, Juyeon Jung. Label-free nanoprobe for antibody detection through an antibody catalysed water oxidation pathway. RSC Advances 2016, 6 (83) , 79998-80001. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA16911B
  44. Long Tu, Liang Huang, Shouhong Jin, Xuzhou Li, Lu Mi, Qiong Wu, Wenhui Wang. Label-free monitoring of molecular binding based on extraordinary optical transmission with enhanced accuracy. 2016, 311-314. https://doi.org/10.1109/MEMSYS.2016.7421622
  45. Yonghai Song, Jingyi Chen, Hongyu Liu, Ping Li, Hongbo Li, Li Wang. A novel conductance glucose biosensor in ultra-low ionic strength solution triggered by the oxidation of Ag nanoparticles. Analytica Chimica Acta 2015, 891 , 144-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2015.08.009
  46. Jing Zhao, Suisui Hu, Ya Cao, Bin Zhang, Genxi Li. Electrochemical detection of protein based on hybridization chain reaction-assisted formation of copper nanoparticles. Biosensors and Bioelectronics 2015, 66 , 327-331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2014.11.039
  47. Marcin Pawlak, Günter Mistlberger, Eric Bakker. Concanavalin A electrochemical sensor based on the surface blocking principle at an ion-selective polymeric membrane. Microchimica Acta 2015, 182 (1-2) , 129-137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00604-014-1309-3
  48. Surya K. Ghosh, Andrey G. Cherstvy, Ralf Metzler. Deformation propagation in responsive polymer network films. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2014, 141 (7) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4893056
  49. Marcin Pawlak, Eric Bakker. Chemical Modification of Polymer Ion‐Selective Membrane Electrode Surfaces. Electroanalysis 2014, 26 (6) , 1121-1131. https://doi.org/10.1002/elan.201300449
  50. Monika Poonia, Anagh Pathak, V. Manjuladevi, R. K. Gupta. Studies on Adsorption of DNA on Functional Ultrathin Films of Cationic Surfactant. Indian Journal of Materials Science 2014, 2014 , 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/502429
  51. M. Pawlak, E. Grygolowicz‐Pawlak, G. A. Crespo, G. Mistlberger, E. Bakker. PVC‐Based Ion‐Selective Electrodes with Enhanced Biocompatibility by Surface Modification with “Click” Chemistry. Electroanalysis 2013, 25 (8) , 1840-1846. https://doi.org/10.1002/elan.201300212

Analytical Chemistry

Cite this: Anal. Chem. 2013, 85, 9, 4770–4776
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/ac400514u
Published March 27, 2013

Copyright © 2013 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under these Terms of Use.

Article Views

3541

Altmetric

-

Citations

Learn about these metrics

Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.

  • Abstract

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. Schematic showing signal build-up as a result of the disturbance of the ion flux set up across the membrane electrode. A marker ion (TBACl) is used to make the electrode responsive to its steady-state concentration at the membrane surface. The internal marker ion leaches out from the sample side, reaching an (A) equilibrium and (B) antigen–antibody binding occurs on the membrane surface, resulting in an increase in surface concentration and hence of the (C) measured potential, which eventually (D) levels off.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. Schematic representation of the sensing principle and the symbols used to describe the concentration changes at each position (layer thicknesses are not to scale). A concentration gradient of a marker ion across the sensing membrane results in its continuous release into the sample solution. As a biorecognition event takes place, the concentration at the membrane surface is increased owing to the build-up of a diffusion barrier, resulting in a potential increase. The dotted line in the binding layer indicates the concentration gradient in the absence of a binding event.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. Calculated potential changes for the surface binding event at the electrode surface that slows the diffusion of the marker ion (logarithmic diffusion coefficient on the x axis) according to eq 6. Diffusion coefficient in the aqueous phase is taken as Djaq = 10–5 cm2 s–1. Stirring the solution decreases the aqueous diffusion layer and hence the potential response.

    Figure 4

    Figure 4. QCM data showing the change in resonance frequency occurring only for the (A) specific electrode (top) upon RSV exposure, whereas the (B) middle (modified with an antibody recognizing HIV-1 gp41 protein as a negative control) and the (C) bottom signal (coated only with PEG) show no response to RSV spikes. (A and B) respond to streptavidin and antibody injections as a result of streptavidin binding to the biotinylated surfaces (PEG-B) and subsequent biotinylated antibody binding to streptavidin while (C) PEG electrode shows no response, as expected.

    Figure 5

    Figure 5. Western Blot and ELISA tests showing the interaction between the anti-RSV F antibody and the F protein in its denatured and native pretriggered conformation. Dark-blue and light blue represent the responses with and without mAb-RSV primary antibody, respectively.

    Figure 6

    Figure 6. (A) Stir effect supporting the proposed mechanism of action. The constant stirring prevented the ion flux from building up the local concentration, which was increased when the stirring was off. (B) Clear signal responses, following stir-effect, recorded potentiometrically from a set of two electrodes in the same measurement cell as a result of BSA binding to the sensor surface. Potential of each electrode, indicated by red and blue, respectively, increases after BSA injection.

    Figure 7

    Figure 7. Data acquired from (A) specific and (B, C, D) a group of 3 types of nonspecific (i.e., control) electrodes. The specific electrode was a PEG-B membrane modified with mAb-RSV, whereas (B) the first control was a PEG-B membrane modified with mAb-gp41. The other two sets were controls based on PEG-only membranes treated with mAb-RSV and mAb-gp41 recognition elements, respectively.

    Figure 8

    Figure 8. A comparison of the potentiometric signal readouts of an electrode treated with mAb-RSV (solid line) and a control electrode with mAb-gp 41 (dashed line), recorded within the same measurement cell. The signal amplitude of the specific electrode increases as the virus concentration in the cell is increased, whereas that from the nonspecific electrode follows a steady baseline except for the highest viral load.

  • References


    This article references 19 other publications.

    1. 1

      Kalorama Information Worldwide POC Diagnostic Test Markets.

    2. 2
      Martino, R.; Porras, R. P.; Rabella, N.; Williams, J. V.; Rámila, E.; Margall, N.; Labeaga, R.; Crowe, J. E., Jr.; Coll, P.; Sierra, J. Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. 2005, 11, 781 796
    3. 3
      Nichols, W. G.; Gooley, T.; Boeckh, M. Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. 2001, 7, 11S 15S
    4. 4
      Khanna, N.; Widmer, A. F.; Decker, M.; Steffen, I.; Halter, J.; Heim, D.; Weisser, M.; Gratwohl, A.; Fluckiger, U.; Hirsch, H. H. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2008, 46, 402 412
    5. 5
      McCarthy, A. J.; Kingman, H. M; Kelly, C.; Taylor, G. S.; Caul, E. O.; Grier, D.; Moppett, J.; Foot, A. B.; Cornish, J. M.; Oakhill, A.; Steward, C .G.; Pamphilon, D. H.; Marks, D. I. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1999, 24, 1315 1322
    6. 6
      Erard, V.; Chien, J. W.; Kim, H .W.; Nichols, W. G.; Flowers, M. E.; Martin, P. J.; Corey, L.; Boeckh, M. J. Infect. Dis. 2006, 193, 1619 1625
    7. 7
      Saleeby, C. M.; Bush, A. J.; Harrison, L. M.; Aitken, J. A.; DeVincenzo, J. P. J. Infect. Dis. 2011, 204, 996 1002
    8. 8
      Bonner, A. B.; Monroe, K. W.; Talley, L .I.; Klasner, A. E.; Kimberlin, D. W. Pediatrics 2003, 112, 363 7
    9. 9
      Bakker, E.; Pretsch, E. Chemistry 2002, 74, 420A 426A
    10. 10
      Vestergaard, M.; Kagan, K.; Tamiya, E. Sensors 2007, 7, 3442 3458
    11. 11
      Zelada-Guillen, G. A.; Riu, J.; Duzgun, A.; Rius, F. X. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 7334 7337
    12. 12
      D’Orazio, P.; Rechnitz, G. A. Anal. Chim. Acta 1979, 109, 25 31
    13. 13
      Vigassy, T.; Morf, W. E.; Badertscher, M.; Ceresa, A.; De Rooij, N. F.; Pretsch, E. Sens. Actuators, B 2001, 76, 477 482
    14. 14
      Pawlak, M.; Mistlberger, G.; Bakker, E. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 12796 12801
    15. 15
      Johnson, S.; Oliver, C.; Prince, G .A.; Hemming, V. G.; Pfarr, D. S.; Wang, S. C.; Dormitzer, M.; O’Grady, J.; Koenig, S.; Tamura, J. K.; Woods, R.; Bansal, G.; Couchenour, D.; Tsao, E.; Hall, W .C.; Young, J. F. J. Infect. Dis. 1997, 176, 1215 1224
    16. 16
      Ekiert, D .C.; Friesen, R. H .E.; Bhabha, G.; Kwaks, T.; Jongeneelen, M.; Yu, W.; Ophorst, C.; Cox, F.; Korse, H. J. W. M.; Brandenburg, B.; Vogels, R.; Brakenhoff, J .P. J.; Kompier, R.; Koldijk, M. H.; Cornelissen, L .A. H. M.; Poon, L .L. M.; Peiris, M.; Koudstaal, W.; Wilson, I. A.; Goudsmit, J. Science 2011, 333, 843 850
    17. 17
      binax® NOW® RSV Rapid Test; Binax Inc.: Portland, Maine, 1998; 6.
    18. 18
      Xu, Y.; Bakker, E. Langmuir 2009, 25, 568 573
    19. 19
      Manz, A.; Simon, W. Anal. Chem. 1987, 59, 74 79
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information


    Synthetic details and additional experiments. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.