ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
Ultrasound-Enhanced Attenuated Total Reflection Mid-infrared Spectroscopy In-Line Probe: Acquisition of Cell Spectra in a Bioreactor
My Activity
  • Open Access
Article

Ultrasound-Enhanced Attenuated Total Reflection Mid-infrared Spectroscopy In-Line Probe: Acquisition of Cell Spectra in a Bioreactor
Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

View Author Information
Institute of Chemical Technologies and Analytics, Vienna University of Technology, Getreidemarkt 9/164-UPA, 1060 Vienna, Austria
Institute of Chemical Engineering, Vienna University of Technology, Gumpendorferstraße 1a, 1060 Vienna, Austria
Christian Doppler Laboratory for Mechanistic and Physiological Methods for Improved Bioprocesses, Institute of Chemical Engineering, Vienna University of Technology, Getreidemarkt 9/166, 1060 Vienna, Austria
Open PDFSupporting Information (1)

Analytical Chemistry

Cite this: Anal. Chem. 2015, 87, 4, 2314–2320
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/ac504126v
Published January 12, 2015

Copyright © 2015 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under CC-BY.

Abstract

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article presents a novel method for selective acquisition of Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectra of microorganisms in-line during fermentation, using Saccharomyces cerevisiae as an example. The position of the cells relative to the sensitive region of the attenuated total reflection (ATR) FT-IR probe was controlled by combing a commercially available ATR in-line probe with contact-free, gentle particle manipulation by ultrasonic standing waves. A prototype probe was successfully constructed, assembled, and tested in-line during fed-batch fermentations of S. cerevisiae. Control over the position of the cells was achieved by tuning the ultrasound frequency: 2.41 MHz was used for acquisition of spectra of the cells (pushing frequency fp) and 1.87 MHz, for retracting the cells from the ATR element, therefore allowing spectra of the medium to be acquired. Accumulation of storage carbohydrates (trehalose and glycogen) inside the cells was induced by a lack of a nitrogen source in the feed medium. These changes in biochemical composition were visible in the spectra of the cells recorded in-line during the application of fp and could be verified by reference spectra of dried cell samples recorded off-line with a FT-IR microscope. Comparison of the cell spectra with spectra of trehalose, glycogen, glucose, and mannan, i.e., the major carbohydrates present in S. cerevisiae, and principal components analysis revealed that the changes observed in the cell spectra correlated well with the bands specific for trehalose and glycogen. This proves the applicability and capability of ultrasound-enhanced in-line ATR mid-IR spectroscopy as a real-time PAT method for the in situ monitoring of cellular biochemistry during fermentation.

Copyright © 2015 American Chemical Society

Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy is an established method for at-line, online, and in-line bioprocess analysis and monitoring, especially in the mid-IR region (400–4000 cm–1). Because water, a strong infrared absorber, is the most abundant solvent and maximum interaction lengths are a few tens of micrometers, attenuated total reflection (ATR) configurations are the most commonly used. The light is totally reflected within an ATR element, resulting in an evanescent field that interacts with the sample, with typical penetration depths of approximately 1 to 2 μm. (1) Multiple reflections lead to enhanced interaction with the sample without having to face the challenges encountered when measuring transmission (clogging, path length changes due to pressure drops, etc.). Multivariate data analysis can be used to extract chemical information from data (i.e., chemometrics); this makes quantification of spectroscopic measurements possible. Lourenço et al. (2) gave a good general overview of optical spectroscopy methods in combination with chemometrics used for bioreactor monitoring, including mid-IR spectroscopy, whereas a mini-review by Landgrebe et al. (3) summarizes recent applications of near- and mid-IR spectroscopy for bioprocess monitoring. A frequently used chemometric method is principal component analysis (PCA). ATR mid-IR spectroscopy in combination with PCA has been, e.g., successfully used for the classification and identification of chemical differences of edible fats and oils, (4)Robusta and Arabica coffees, (5) and injured and intact Listeria monocytogenes. (6)
For various bioprocesses, spectra of media components and excreted secondary metabolites have been recorded at-line, (7-10) online, and in-line. Online bypass systems were successfully used to monitor media composition and products (11-13) and for pH control (14) in different types of bioprocesses. In-line ATR probes are realized using fiber optics (typically, silver halide) or light conduits and are commercially available. Doak and Phillips reported the first use of a conduit probe to monitor Escherichia coli fermentation in 1999; (15) since then, numerous reports of in-line, i.e., in situ (the more commonly used term in bioprocess engineering), monitoring of fermentation have been published. (16-20)
Spectra of microorganisms are acquired at-line or off-line and allow for differentiation between physiological states, reflected by biochemical composition and the quantification of secondary metabolites accumulated inside cells. In most studies, transmission spectra of washed, dried cells were measured, either by FT-IR microspectroscopy (21, 22) or with the dedicated microplate reader accessory HTS-XT for high-throughput analysis (Bruker Optics). (23-27) Transmission and ATR FT-IR microspectroscopy were successfully used for the analysis and differentiation of physiological states in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. (28-31) Jarute et al. presented the first online setup for the quantification of poly beta-hydroxybutyic acid (PHB) in E. coli using a horizontal ATR in combination with a stopped-flow system. (32) When the flow was on, spectra of the medium were acquired; subsequently, the flow was switched off, and the cells sedimented onto the ATR surface and thus spectra of the cells could be acquired. Biofouling was avoided by chemical cleaning of the ATR as necessary.

Ultrasound Particle Manipulation

Ultrasonic standing wave fields, built up between an ultrasound transducer and a reflector, are a contact-free, gentle method for manipulation of small particles in suspension. Particle sizes between one and a few tens of micrometers require ultrasound frequencies between 1 and 10 MHz. The axial acoustic radiation force, i.e., in the direction of sound propagation, acting on the particles depends on particle volume, the ultrasound frequency, the acoustic energy density, i.e., the power that is transmitted into the medium, and the acoustic contrast factor. (33-35) The force results in a pattern of planes that are half of a wavelength apart, into which the particles are driven. These planes are either the pressure nodal planes (i.e., the planes of minimum acoustic pressure) or the pressure antinodal planes of the standing wave field, depending on the acoustic contrast factor between the particles and the carrier medium. This, in turn, depends on the ratio of the sound speeds and mass densities between the particles and the medium; dense particles, like cells, are driven into the pressure nodes of the standing wave field. Ultrasound particle manipulation is not harmful to cells (36, 37) and is a state-of-the-art method for perfusion filtering of mammalian cell cultures, where it is used to hold cells against a continuous flow of medium. (38-40)
Ultrasound particle manipulation was used to increase the robustness of online cell spectra acquisition (S. cerevisiae) in a setup similar to that of Jarute et al., (32) by using the radiation force to lift the cells off of the horizontal ATR surface, which acted as ultrasound reflector. (41) Furthermore, the settling speed, and thus the measurement intervals, could be increased by the formation of cell aggregates in the pressure nodal planes, which sedimented faster than single cells once the ultrasound and the flow were switched off. A major drawback of bypass setups are sterility issues. This can be overcome by taking the system in-line. (42) Radel et al. showed in 2010 that the combination of ultrasound particle manipulation and a fiber optic ATR probe made acquisition of mid-IR spectra of PTFE particles in stirred suspensions possible. (43) Here, the ATR element was oriented vertically, and the particles were pushed against it by tuning the ultrasound frequency such that a net acoustic radiation force acted in the direction of the ATR element. In 2013, we showed that spectra of S. cerevisiae could be acquired with a prototype in-line applicable probe. (44)
This article presents a major step forward in this development: an autoclavable, in-line ultrasound-enhanced fiber optic mid-IR ATR probe constructed according to FDA guidelines and its application during S. cerevisiae fermentation in-line in a semi-industrial fermenter. Within fed-batch fermentation, the cells were deliberately nitrogen-limited by the design of the media and therefore started to accumulate storage carbohydrates, i.e., trehalose and glycogen, which was investigated. We recently showed the possibility of off-line quantification of these carbohydrates in whole S. cerevisiae by FT-IR microspectroscopy. (31) Here, we investigated the possibility of monitoring these biochemical changes in-line by comparing them to off-line reference spectra and principal component analysis.

Experimental Section

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Ultrasound-Enhanced Fiber Optic ATR FT-IR Probe

Spectrometer and In-Line Probe

FT-IR spectra were acquired in-line with the process spectrometer ReactIR 15 equipped with an attenuated total reflection DS DiComp (diamond) 9.5 mm probe connected via a 1.5 m AgX (silver halide) fiber (all Mettler Toledo, Greifensee, Switzerland). The spectrometer was equipped with a liquid nitrogen cooled mercury–cadmium–telluride (MCT) detector. Spectra were acquired with resolutions of 4 and 8 cm–1, respectively, in the spectral region from 700 to 2800 cm–1 as the co-addition of 256 scans. iC IR 4.2 software (Mettler Toledo, Greifensee, Switzerland) was used for acquisition and basic data manipulation such as single-point baseline offset correction (1840 cm–1 set to zero). The DS DiComp probe was chosen due to its flat top, which makes it especially suitable as a reflector for the ultrasonic wave.

Ultrasound Technology: Material and Design Considerations

The fiber optic probe was equipped with an in-house-designed ultrasound accessory that allowed for manipulation of particles in suspension (Figure 1a,b). The materials were chosen with consideration of FDA regulations, i.e., standard materials used in biotechnology were applied (body, stainless steel material no. 1.4571/DIN X6CrNiMoTi17-12-2; screws, stainless steel A4 (1.4404) (Bossard, Zug, Switzerland); seals and O-rings, ZruElast and ZruElast FPM 75 shore (both Zrunek, Vienna, Austria)). The ultrasound composite transducer consisted of a 10 mm PZT (lead zirconium titante, type PIC 181, PI Ceramics, Lederhose, Germany) disc with wrap-around silver electrodes glued to a Macor cylinder with a one-component epoxy resin (Araldite AV 171, Huntsman Advanced Materials, The Woodlands, TX, USA). The assembled ultrasound-enhanced mid-IR ATR probe complies with the 3D rule to avoid turbulent flow stagnation, i.e., indentations were limited to three times their respective widths, and it is autoclavable in situ (121 °C, 20 min). A modified (limited to 2.5 W max power output) frequency power synthesizer (FPS 2540, SinePhase Instruments, Hinterbrühl, Austria) connected to the PZT was used for ultrasound signal generation and amplification; frequency and power were controlled using a custom LabView script and GUI (National Instruments, Austin, TX, USA). The distance between the ultrasound transducer and ATR probe was adjusted to approximately 1.35 mm.
The working principle is shown in the inset in Figure 1c: At retracting frequency fr, cells are held in the pressure nodal planes away from the evanescent field of the ATR probe, whereas they are pushed against the ATR surface and thus into the evanescent field when the pushing frequency fp is applied.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Schematic (a) and photograph (b) of the prototype probe: commercial ATR probe and the custom-built ultrasound accessory. (c) The two operating modes. The cells and the evanescent field are magnified by a factor of 10 in comparison to the other dimensions for visibility.

Laboratory FT-IR Spectrometers: Reference Spectra

Reference spectra of glucose, trehalose, and mannan solutions and glycogen mixed with H2O were acquired with a Tensor 37 FT-IR spectrometer equipped with a DTGS (deuterated triglycine sulfate) detector using a Platinum diamond ATR (all Bruker Optics, Ettlingen, Germany). Instrument control and spectrum acquisition were performed with OPUS 7 software (Bruker Optics). Spectral resolution was set to 2 cm–1, and spectra were recorded as the co-addition of 32 scans.
Sampling, pretreatment of the off-line samples, and acquisition of reference spectra of dried yeast samples drawn during fermentation have been described elsewhere. (31)

S. cerevisiae Cultivations

Fermentation of S. cerevisiae (strain CBS8340) was carried out in two different, fully automated and controlled stirred bioreactors: a 10 L glass/steel bioreactor (Chemap, Switzerland) and a 15 L steel bioreactor (Infors, Bottmingen, Switzerland). Both were equipped with 25 mm Ingold ports for coupling with the ultrasound-enhanced mid-IR ATR probe. Media preparation and cultivation conditions are described in detail in the Supporting Information (Experimental, page S2, and Table S1, page S2); the stirring speed was varied (800–1200 rpm), and the pO2 level was always kept above 80% by adjusting the inflow of air. CO2 content of the off-gas was measured using an off-gas analyzer (Bluesens, Snirgelskamp, Germany). Biomass was determined off-line by measuring the optical density at 600 nm with a Genesys 20 visible spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).
After the batch phase on glucose was completed, the bioprocess was carried on as a C-limited fed-batch with an exponential feed strategy. The feed medium was deficient in a nitrogen source. Under C-limited feeding conditions, no excess carbon source was present in the medium. The nitrogen limitation led to the synthesis and accumulation of storage carbohydrates, i.e., trehalose and glycogen, inside the cells.

Experimental Procedure for Ultrasound-Enhanced Mid-IR Spectroscopy

During fermentations, fp was 2.410 MHz at 1.8–1.9 W true electrical power input (t.e.p.i.), and fr was 1.870 MHz at 1.6 W t.e.p.i.

Data Analysis

Matlab (Mathworks, Natick, MA, USA) and the PLS toolbox (Eigenvector Research, Wenatchee, WA, USA) were used for data manipulation and PCA. For PCA, the spectra were area normalized in the carbohydrate region (938–1186 cm–1) prior to calculation of the second derivate (Savitzky-Golay, second order, window width 9 or 11 depending on spectral resolution). Single-analyte spectra were normalized and differentiated using the same settings for comparison.

Results and Discussion

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

In-Line Procedure

Spectra were acquired in-line during fermentation, alternating between pushing and retracting frequency every 10 min. Three FT-IR spectra were acquired at each ultrasound frequency; they were subsequently averaged for further data analysis, resulting in a single, average, spectrum for each frequency application. The background was acquired in batch medium with the probe in its final position in the bioreactor after autoclaving. This was used as the background for the absorbance spectra of the medium, i.e., spectra recorded during the application of the retracting frequency. Absorbance spectra of the cells were calculated as difference spectra between a spectrum acquired during the application of the pushing frequency and the respective previous media spectrum (Figure 2). This was necessary to compensate for changes in the medium composition, as there is always medium in the probed volume and analyte concentrations are higher (and vary stronger over the course of the fermentation) in the medium than in the cells themselves. Samples were drawn from the bioreactor at different times for biomass determination and the acquisition of cell reference spectra.

Figure 2

Figure 2. In-line spectra acquired during S. cerevisiae fermentation when applying retracting frequency (top) or pushing frequency (middle) and their difference spectrum showing typical spectral features of yeast cells.

Optimization of Experimental Conditions

In total, four fermentations were conducted; the influence of the ultrasound frequency for pushing and retracting, stirring speed, and spectral and temporal resolution were investigated, and the optima were subsequently used. The highest yeast-related absorption values in difference spectra were found using a pushing frequency of 2.410 MHz and a power of 1.8–1.9 W t.e.p.i. (fp). For retracting the particles from the evanescent field of the ATR element, the ultrasound transducer was driven around fr 1.870 MHz (at 1.6 W t.e.p.i.). Stirring speeds between 600 and 1200 rpm were tested: an increase in stirring speed led to a decrease of absorption values of the recorded spectra due to Stokes drag (data not shown). As a compromise between sufficient stirring and satisfactory signal of the mid-IR spectra of cells, a stirring speed of 800 rpm was identified. Comparison of spectral resolutions of 4 and 8 cm–1 showed that the broad absorption bands of S. cerevisiae were sufficiently resolved by the latter (data not shown). Temporal resolution was governed by spectrum acquisition time (i.e., 1 min at 8 cm–1 resolution and co-addition of 256 scans), sufficient data redundancy (in case of erroneous spectra and to increase the signal-to-noise ratio), and maximum handleable file size. Spectra were acquired every 2 min; thus, as mentioned before, three spectra were available for averaging during alternating application of the ultrasound frequencies for 10 min each. These parameters were determined during the first fermentation and were subsequently used. The spectra recorded during the four fermentations showed similar trends, and an exemplary one will be presented here.

Influence of Growth Conditions on Yeast Cells

In order to study changes on the (bio)chemical composition of the cells, the fermentation was carried out in two parts: a batch phase, with an excess of glucose (C-source) and ammonium (N-source), and subsequently a C-limited fed-batch phase during which no additional N-source was fed and trehalose and glycogen were accumulated inside the cells.

Batch Phase

At the beginning of the batch phase, glucose was present in excess in the medium, leading to the production of ethanol as a main metabolite in addition to biomass (Crabtree effect, overflow metabolism). The cells exhibited characteristic diauxic growth: first, glucose was metabolized to ethanol in parallel with biomass formation (0–12 h) and then, after a short lag phase, the extracellular ethanol was metabolized as a carbon source (12–20 h). This was reflected by the CO2 off-gas profile and the FT-IR spectra of the medium (Figure 3). Characteristic spectral features of glucose were predominant at first (Figure 3b, dark red spectra, bands at 1150, 1110, 1080, and 1037 cm–1) followed by a superposition of glucose and ethanol (light red spectra). Once the glucose was depleted, ethanol dominated the FT-IR spectra, with its characteristic bands at 1045 and 1080 cm–1 (blue spectra), which gradually decreased until the end of the batch phase (light blue spectrum).

Figure 3

Figure 3. (a) CO2 off-gas and biomass over the course of the batch phase. (b) ATR FT-IR spectra of the medium (i.e., retracting frequency applied) over the course of the batch phase.

During batch phase, yeast cell composition did not change; only biomass growth occurred, which was reflected by an increase in absorbance over time, whereas spectral features remained similar (see Supporting Information Figure S1).

Fed-Batch Phase

The spectra of dried S. cerevisiae fed-batch samples acquired off-line (Figure 4a) show spectral features typical for the constituents of biological cells (from refs 45 and 46): The C═O stretching of ester groups in lipids leads to an absorption around 1730 cm–1. Proteins lead to absorptions around 1655 cm–1 (amide I band, mainly from C═O stretching and, to a lesser extent, N–H bend and C–N stretch), around 1550 cm–1 (amide II band, N–H bend, and C–N stretch), and around 1300 cm–1 (amide III band, complex combination of different vibrations). In the region between 1450 and 1200 cm–1, numerous C–H and O–H deformation vibrations contribute to the spectrum (lipids, carbohydrates). Antisymmetric PO2 stretching vibrations of DNA, RNA, and phospholipids lead to absorptions around 1240 cm–1. The region between 950 and 1200 cm–1 (hereafter, carbohydrate region) is dominated by C–O stretching originating from carbohydrates, with contributions around 1100 cm–1 from symmetric PO2 stretching (again, DNA, RNA, and phosopholipids).
The changes in carbohydrate content induced by N-limited growth are reflected by changes in the shape of the spectra acquired off-line (Figure 4a, normalized to the amide I band). The relative carbohydrate content increases with fermentation time, and the shape of the carbohydrate region changes as trehalose and glycogen are formed in the cells. The carbohydrate bands of the difference spectra of the cells acquired in-line at the time points of sampling (Figure 4b, offset baseline corrected) are in good agreement with the off-line spectra (Figure 4a). Differences can be attributed to matrix influence, band shifts due to acquisition in ATR mode, and the lower signal-to-noise ratio for in-line spectra.

Figure 4

Figure 4. (a) Spectra of dried S. cerevisiae acquired off-line using a laboratory FT-IR microscope (normalized to amide I band). (b) Spectra of S. cerevisiae acquired in-line using the ultrasound-enhanced mid-IR ATR probe at the times when samples for off-line analysis were drawn.

A major difference between the off- and in-line measurements was observed in the amide I and amide II regions: here, H2O absorbs strongly (H–O–H bending at approximately 1640 cm–1) and therefore the intensity reaching the detector is low, leading to a high noise level. The protein bands (amide I and II) are only weakly visible in the in-line spectra, most likely because the H2O present when the fr spectrum is acquired is simply replaced by the protein present in S. cerevisiae when fp is applied, leading to approximately the same absorption. Furthermore, when fp is applied, H2O is, for the most part but never completely, replaced by yeast cells (even assuming close packing of equal spheres, approximately 26% of the space would still be occupied by H2O).
Since changes associated with switching to nitrogen-limited growth are mainly visible in the carbohydrate region of the FT-IR spectra, further analysis was focused on this region. The main carbohydrates of yeast were studied: mannan, a cell wall polysaccharide composed of mannose units, and intracellular carbohydrates trehalose, a disaccharide of glucose, glycogen, a polysaccharide of glucose, and glucose. ATR FT-IR reference spectra of the major carbohydrates (area normalized as described in the Experimental Section) present in yeast cells are shown in Figure 5a. At 994 cm–1, trehalose, one of the storage carbohydrates accumulated during N-limited growth, has an intense and specific absorption. In the spectral region between 1025 and 1175 cm–1, trehalose and glucose show bands at similar positions; their relative intensities are, however, different. Glucose absorbs strongest at 1035 cm–1, whereas the relative absorption maximum of trehalose in this region is shifted toward slightly higher wavenumbers and is lower in intensity. At around 1155 cm–1, trehalose and glycogen have a common absorption band. Glycogen absorbs broadly between 970 and 1170 cm–1, with a distinct maximum at 1022 cm–1 and smaller maxima at 1080 and 1152 cm–1. Mannan has a broad absorption band between 1000 and 1150 cm–1, with a distinct maximum at 1060 cm–1. The exact positions of absorption maxima are even clearer when looking at second derivatives of the spectra: maxima in the spectra are minima here (Figure 5b, top).

Figure 5

Figure 5. (a) Spectra of major carbohydrates present in yeast cells (off-line ATR, in solution) and spectra of yeast cells acquired in-line over the course of the fermentation. (b) Second-derivative spectra of major carbohydrates present in yeast cells and of yeast cells acquired over the course of the fermentation, respectively. In both graphs, carbohydrate spectra are offset for better visibility.

In the yeast, changes in the carbohydrate composition can be observed by spectra acquired in-line as difference spectra over the course of the N-limited fed-batch fermentation (Figure 5a, bottom). The shape of the carbohydrate band changed with fermentation time, most notably between 1050 and 950 cm–1. The blue spectra, which were acquired toward the end of the fermentation, show higher absorption around 990 cm–1, correlating well with the absorption spectra of trehalose. This becomes even clearer when investigating second-derivate spectra: The decrease around 994 cm–1 and the increase around 970 cm–1 in the spectra acquired toward the end of the fermentation (blue) correlate well with the trehalose second-derivative spectrum (gray). Between 1030 and 1000 cm–1, the slope of the second-derivative yeast spectra steepens with fermentation time. The minimum at ∼1150 cm–1, which further decreases with fermentation time, correlates with an increase in both glycogen and trehalose. Since this minimum is less pronounced for trehalose compared to the one at 994 cm–1, it can be concluded that glycogen mainly contributes to this change.

PCA

We have recently shown that quantitative determination of carbohydrates is possible from off-line yeast spectra; (31) from the in-line difference spectra, only qualitative information on the changes in carbohydrate composition could be observed. Normalization of the spectra proved to be difficult because changes in biomass and in the carbohydrate content occurred simultaneously, and this correlation could not be broken. To evaluate if the trends observed in the in-line difference spectra are statistically detectable and related to carbohydrate features, PCA was performed on the second-derivative spectra.
Individual PCA of the four fermentations resulted in very similar principal component 1 (PC1), which explained between 53 and 73% of the variation in the respective fermentation spectra. A PCA of the combined spectra from all four fermentations again resulted in a PC1 with very similar features; however, only 40% of the variance was explained. This can be attributed to interfermentation variations leading a smaller contribution from changes induced by N-limited growth. To concentrate on the biochemical changes inside the cells, the following discussion is based on the PCA of a single fermentation.
The loading vector of PC1 and the second-derivative spectra of trehalose, glycogen, glucose, and mannan show similar features (Figure 6). Spectral region A (1020–970 cm–1) of PC1 correlates with trehalose: the minimum is around 995 cm–1 for both, followed by a maximum at 980 cm–1 and a shoulder around 960 cm–1. This region also varies the most between spectra, reflected by the highest values of the first loading vector. The plateau at 1035 cm–1 followed by a minimum around 1025 cm–1 in PC1 correlates with glycogen, superimposed with trehalose and glucose (thus, the shift of the minimum toward higher wavenumbers). In spectral region B (1050 to 1103 cm–1), trehalose, glycogen, glucose, and PC1 show very similar features, and a clear attribution cannot be made. Around 1155 cm–1 (spectral region C), the minimum in PC1 corresponds to a superposition of the minima of both trehalose and glycogen.

Figure 6

Figure 6. Second-derivative spectra of trehalose, glycogen, glucose, and mannan and PC1 of spectra acquired during N-limited growth.

Conclusions and Outlook

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The presented method allows for the selective acquisition of mid-IR spectra of either dissolved analytes (media components) or suspended particles (cells). This is, to the best of our knowledge, the first report on the acquisition of mid-IR spectra of microorganisms (S. cerevisiae) inside a semi-industrial bioreactor during fermentation without the necessity of drawing a sample. The cell spectra acquired in-line are in good agreement with spectra of dried cell samples that were recorded off-line. Trends in the changes of the biochemical composition of the cells during N-limited fed-batch fermentation were visible, showing the potential of ultrasound-enhanced ATR mid-IR spectroscopy to be used as a PAT (process analytical technology) probe to detect the cells’ physiological response to nutritional limitations. Quantitative analysis proved to be difficult, as the number of cells present in the evanescent field is hard to estimate and the amide I band, which could be used for normalization off-line, was not accessible in-line. Furthermore, the signal-to-noise ratio of the difference spectra still needs to be improved to make quantitative analysis by, e.g., partial least-squares regression possible. More insight into the spatial distribution of the cells in the evanescent field could potentially be gained using the gel method proposed by Gherardini et al.; (47) with a better understanding of the number of cells held in the evanescent field at a given time under different conditions, the before-mentioned challenges will be addressed in a follow-up project.
The described novel method is generic and suitable for (ideally spherical) cells within a size range of 1 to approximately 40 μm, as is often employed in white and red biotechnology and biorefinery. It delivers real-time information on the chemical composition of cells in situ, thus aiding the optimization of process conditions and media composition. Moreover, physiological responses of cells can be investigated, helping to obtain a basic understanding of cell physiology/metabolism. In industrial fermentation, the method could serve as a quality control tool: here, complex media are often employed, for which exact determination of nutrient concentrations would usually require extensive and laborious chemical analyses or is not possible at all. By measuring the cell’s biochemical composition, potential limitations could be detected, and appropriate measures to ensure the desired quality could be taken early in the process.
Apart from bioprocesses, the presented method can, for example, be applied to gain insight into crystallization processes.

Supporting Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Experimental details on media preparation and cultivation conditions. Table S1: Overview of the setup and conditions of the fed-batch fermentations. Figure S1: Spectra of S. cerevisiae acquired in-line during batch phase fermentation. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

  • Corresponding Author
    • Bernhard Lendl - Institute of Chemical Technologies and Analytics, Vienna University of Technology, Getreidemarkt 9/164-UPA, 1060 Vienna, Austria Email: [email protected]
  • Authors
    • Cosima Koch - Institute of Chemical Technologies and Analytics, Vienna University of Technology, Getreidemarkt 9/164-UPA, 1060 Vienna, Austria
    • Markus Brandstetter - Institute of Chemical Technologies and Analytics, Vienna University of Technology, Getreidemarkt 9/164-UPA, 1060 Vienna, Austria
    • Patrick Wechselberger - Institute of Chemical Engineering, Vienna University of Technology, Gumpendorferstraße 1a, 1060 Vienna, AustriaChristian Doppler Laboratory for Mechanistic and Physiological Methods for Improved Bioprocesses, Institute of Chemical Engineering, Vienna University of Technology, Getreidemarkt 9/166, 1060 Vienna, Austria
    • Bettina Lorantfy - Institute of Chemical Engineering, Vienna University of Technology, Gumpendorferstraße 1a, 1060 Vienna, Austria
    • Maria Reyes Plata - Institute of Chemical Technologies and Analytics, Vienna University of Technology, Getreidemarkt 9/164-UPA, 1060 Vienna, Austria
    • Stefan Radel - Institute of Chemical Technologies and Analytics, Vienna University of Technology, Getreidemarkt 9/164-UPA, 1060 Vienna, Austria
    • Christoph Herwig - Institute of Chemical Engineering, Vienna University of Technology, Gumpendorferstraße 1a, 1060 Vienna, AustriaChristian Doppler Laboratory for Mechanistic and Physiological Methods for Improved Bioprocesses, Institute of Chemical Engineering, Vienna University of Technology, Getreidemarkt 9/166, 1060 Vienna, Austria
  • Notes
    The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgment

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The authors express their gratitude to Lukas Strobl for realization of the Labview control of the ultrasound frequency generator and Gerhard Fritsch for assistance in the assembly of the prototype probe and with preliminary experiments. Partial financial support provided by the Austrian Research Promotion Agency (FFG) under the scope of the COMET program within the research network “Process Analytical Chemistry (PAC)” (contract no. 825340) (C.K. and M.B.) and the Austrian Science Fund FWF (project no. P24154-N17) (C.K. and S.R.) is gratefully acknowledged. C.K. gratefully acknowledges partial financial support by the AB-Tec graduate school (TU Wien). European Social Fund from European Union and Junta de Comunidades de Castilla-La Mancha are gratefully acknowledged for supporting given through a Postdoctoral research contract for M.R.P.

References

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article references 47 other publications.

  1. 1
    Griffiths, P. R.; de Haseth, J. A. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectrometry, 2nd ed.; Wiley-Interscience: Hoboken, NJ, 2007; pp 321 348.
  2. 2
    Lourenço, N. D.; Lopes, J. A.; Almeida, C. F.; Sarraguça, M. C.; Pinheiro, H. M. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2012, 404, 1211 1237
  3. 3
    Landgrebe, D.; Haake, C.; Höpfner, T.; Beutel, S.; Hitzmann, B.; Scheper, T.; Rhiel, M.; Reardon, K. F. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010, 88, 11 22
  4. 4
    Dupuy, N.; Duponchel, L.; Huvenne, J. P.; Sombret, B.; Legrand, P. Food Chem. 1996, 51, 245 251
  5. 5
    Briandet, R.; Kemsley, E. K.; Wilson, R. H. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1996, 44, 170 174
  6. 6
    Lin, M.; Al-Holy, M.; Al-Qadiri, H.; Kang, D.-H.; Cavinato, A. G.; Huang, Y.; Rasco, B. A. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2004, 52, 5769 5772
  7. 7
    Sivakesava, S.; Irudayaraj, J.; Ali, D. Process Biochem. 2001, 37, 371 378
  8. 8
    Franco, V. G.; Perín, J. C.; Mantovani, V. E.; Goicoechea, H. C. Talanta 2006, 68, 1005 1012
  9. 9
    Roychoudhury, P.; Harvey, L. M.; McNeil, B. Anal. Chim. Acta 2006, 561, 218 224
  10. 10
    Roychoudhury, P.; McNeil, B.; Harvey, L. M. Anal. Chim. Acta 2007, 585, 246 252
  11. 11
    Kansiz, M.; Gapes, J. R.; McNaughton, D.; Lendl, B.; Schuster, K. C. Anal. Chim. Acta 2001, 438, 175 186
  12. 12
    Mazarevica, G.; Diewok, J.; Baena, J. R.; Rosenberg, E.; Lendl, B. Appl. Spectrosc. 2004, 58, 804 810
  13. 13
    Schenk, J.; Marison, I. W.; von Stockar, U. J. Biotechnol. 2007, 128, 344 353
  14. 14
    Schenk, J.; Marison, I. W.; von Stockar, U. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2008, 100, 82 93
  15. 15
    Doak, D. L.; Phillips, J. A. Biotechnol. Prog. 1999, 15, 529 539
  16. 16
    Pollard, D.; Buccino, R.; Connors, N.; Kirschner, T.; Olewinski, R.; Saini, K.; Salmon, P. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 2001, 24, 13 24
  17. 17
    Kornmann, H.; Rhiel, M.; Cannizzaro, C.; Marison, I.; von Stockar, U. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2003, 82, 702 709
  18. 18
    Kornmann, H.; Valentinotti, S.; Duboc, P.; Marison, I.; von Stockar, U. J. Biotechnol. 2004, 113, 231 245
  19. 19
    Dahlbacka, J.; Weegar, J.; von Weymarn, N.; Fagervik, K. Biotechnol. Lett. 2012, 34, 1009 1017
  20. 20
    Koch, C.; Posch, A. E.; Goicoechea, H. C.; Herwig, C.; Lendl, B. Anal. Chim. Acta 2014, 807, 103 110
  21. 21
    Kansiz, M.; Billman-Jacobe, H.; McNaughton, D. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2000, 66, 3415 3420
  22. 22
    Stehfest, K.; Toepel, J.; Wilhelm, C. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2005, 43, 717 726
  23. 23
    Dean, A. P.; Sigee, D. C.; Estrada, B.; Pittman, J. K. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101, 4499 4507
  24. 24
    Wagner, H.; Liu, Z.; Langner, U.; Stehfest, K.; Wilhelm, C. J. Biophotonics 2010, 3, 557 566
  25. 25
    Winder, C. L.; Cornmell, R.; Schuler, S.; Jarvis, R. M.; Stephens, G. M.; Goodacre, R. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2011, 399, 387 401
  26. 26
    Scholz, T.; Lopes, V. V.; Calado, C. R. C. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2012, 109, 2279 2285
  27. 27
    Corte, L.; Rellini, P.; Roscini, L.; Fatichenti, F.; Cardinali, G. Anal. Chim. Acta 2010, 659, 258 265
  28. 28
    Burattini, E.; Cavagna, M.; Dell’Anna, R.; Malvezzi Campeggi, F.; Monti, F.; Rossi, F.; Torriani, S. Vib. Spectrosc. 2008, 47, 139 147
  29. 29
    Cavagna, M.; Dell’Anna, R.; Monti, F.; Rossi, F.; Torriani, S. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010, 58, 39 45
  30. 30
    Kuligowski, J.; Quintás, G.; Herwig, C.; Lendl, B. Talanta 2012, 99, 566 573
  31. 31
    Plata, M. R.; Koch, C.; Wechselberger, P.; Herwig, C.; Lendl, B. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2013, 405, 8241 8250
  32. 32
    Jarute, G.; Kainz, A.; Schroll, G.; Baena, J. R.; Lendl, B. Anal. Chem. 2004, 76, 6353 6358
  33. 33
    King, L. V. Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 1934, 147, 212 240
  34. 34
    Yosioka, K.; Kawasima, Y. Acustica 1955, 5, 167 173
  35. 35
    Gor’kov, L. P. Phys.–Dokl. 1962, 6, 773 775
  36. 36
    Radel, S.; McLoughlin, A. J.; Gherardini, L.; Doblhoff-Dier, O.; Benes, E. Ultrasonics 2000, 38, 633 637
  37. 37
    Wiklund, M. Lab Chip 2012, 12, 2018 2028
  38. 38
    Trampler, F.; Sonderhoff, S. A.; Pui, P. W. S.; Kilburn, D. G.; Piret, J. M. Nat. Biotechnol. 1994, 12, 281 284
  39. 39
    Gorenflo, V. M.; Smith, L.; Dedinsky, B.; Persson, B.; Piret, J. M. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2002, 80, 438 444
  40. 40
    Gorenflo, V. M.; Ritter, J. B.; Aeschliman, D. S.; Drouin, H.; Bowen, B. D.; Piret, J. M. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2005, 90, 746 753
  41. 41
    Radel, S.; Schnöller, J.; Gröschl, M.; Benes, E.; Lendl, B. IEEE Sens. J. 2010, 10, 1615 1622
  42. 42
    Lendl, B.; Radel, S.; Brandstetter, M. Device for FTIR Absorption Spectroscopy. PCT/AT2010/000006, 2010.
  43. 43
    Radel, S.; Brandstetter, M.; Lendl, B. Ultrasonics 2010, 50, 240 246
  44. 44
    Koch, C.; Brandstetter, M.; Lendl, B.; Radel, S. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2013, 39, 1094 1101
  45. 45
    Socrates, G. Infrared and Raman Characteristic Group Frequencies: Tables and Charts, 3rd ed.; Wiley & Sons Ltd: New York, 2001.
  46. 46
    Naumann, D.; Helm, D.; Labischinski, H. Nature 1991, 351, 81 82
  47. 47
    Gherardini, L.; Radel, S.; Sielemann, S.; Doblhoff-Dier, O.; Gröschl, M.; Benes, E.; McLoughlin, A. Bioseparation 2001, 10, 153 162

Cited By

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article is cited by 32 publications.

  1. Takuya Kambayashi, Toshimitsu Noguchi, Akihiro Nojima, Shunsuke Kono, Shin-ichi Taniguchi, Yukihiro Ozaki. Glucose Monitoring in Cell Culture with Online Ultrasound-Assisted Near-Infrared Spectroscopy. Analytical Chemistry 2020, 92 (4) , 2946-2952. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.9b03354
  2. Karin Wieland, Stefan Tauber, Christoph Gasser, Lukas A. Rettenbacher, Laurin Lux, Stefan Radel, Bernhard Lendl. In-Line Ultrasound-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy Allows for Highly Sensitive Analysis with Improved Selectivity in Suspensions. Analytical Chemistry 2019, 91 (22) , 14231-14238. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.9b01105
  3. Xi Yang. Controllable Interfacial Polymerization for Nanofiltration Membrane Performance Improvement by the Polyphenol Interlayer. ACS Omega 2019, 4 (9) , 13824-13833. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.9b01446
  4. Stephan Freitag, Bettina Baumgartner, Stefan Tauber, Christoph Gasser, Stefan Radel, Andreas Schwaighofer, Bernhard Lendl. An Acoustic Trap for Bead Injection Attenuated Total Reflection Infrared Spectroscopy. Analytical Chemistry 2019, 91 (12) , 7672-7678. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.9b00611
  5. Peizhou Yang, Zhuanzhuan Lin, Jianchao Chen, Shuying Jiang, Zhi Zheng, Kanglin Wang. S. cerevisiae ERG5DeltaNTH1DeltaAMS1Delta construction enhancing stress tolerance for ethanol production increase in the presence of inhibitors and mechanism analysis based on the comparative transcriptomics. Heliyon 2024, 10 (22) , e37885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37885
  6. Barbara Zupančič, Chiedozie Kenneth Ugwoke, Mohamed Elwy Abdelhamed Abdelmonaem, Armin Alibegović, Erika Cvetko, Jože Grdadolnik, Anja Šerbec, Nejc Umek. Exploration of macromolecular phenotype of human skeletal muscle in diabetes using infrared spectroscopy. Frontiers in Endocrinology 2023, 14 https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2023.1308373
  7. Dnyandeo Pawar, Daniela Lo Presti, Sergio Silvestri, Emiliano Schena, Carlo Massaroni. Current and future technologies for monitoring cultured meat: A review. Food Research International 2023, 173 , 113464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2023.113464
  8. Wubulitalifu Dawuti, Jingrui Dou, Xiangxiang Zheng, Xiaoyi Lü, Hui Zhao, Lingfei Yang, Renyong Lin, Guodong Lü. Rapid and accurate screening of cystic echinococcosis in sheep based on serum Fourier‐transform infrared spectroscopy combined with machine learning algorithms. Journal of Biophotonics 2023, 16 (5) https://doi.org/10.1002/jbio.202200320
  9. Armin Lambrecht, Carsten Bolwien, Hendrik Fuhr, Gerd Sulz, Annett Isserstedt-Trinke, André Magi, Steffen Biermann, Jürgen Wöllenstein. Compact silicon-based attenuated total reflection (ATR) sensor module for liquid analysis. Journal of Sensors and Sensor Systems 2023, 12 (1) , 123-131. https://doi.org/10.5194/jsss-12-123-2023
  10. Rudolf W. Kessler, Michael Maiwald, Waltraud Kessler. Inline and Online Process Analytical Technology with a Focus on Optical Spectroscopy. 2022, 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470027318.a9791
  11. Barbara Zupančič, Nejc Umek, Chiedozie Kenneth Ugwoke, Erika Cvetko, Simon Horvat, Jože Grdadolnik. Application of FTIR Spectroscopy to Detect Changes in Skeletal Muscle Composition Due to Obesity with Insulin Resistance and STZ-Induced Diabetes. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2022, 23 (20) , 12498. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232012498
  12. Jakub Dybas, Fatih Celal Alcicek, Aleksandra Wajda, Magdalena Kaczmarska, Anna Zimna, Katarzyna Bulat, Aneta Blat, Tetiana Stepanenko, Tasnim Mohaissen, Ewa Szczesny-Malysiak, David Perez-Guaita, Bayden R. Wood, Katarzyna Maria Marzec. Trends in biomedical analysis of red blood cells – Raman spectroscopy against other spectroscopic, microscopic and classical techniques. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry 2022, 146 , 116481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2021.116481
  13. Nicolai Arndt, Carsten Bolwien, Gerd Sulz, Frank Kühnemann, Armin Lambrecht. Diamond-Coated Silicon ATR Elements for Process Analytics. Sensors 2021, 21 (19) , 6442. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21196442
  14. Philipp Doppler, Christoph Gasser, Ricarda Kriechbaum, Ardita Ferizi, Oliver Spadiut. In Situ Quantification of Polyhydroxybutyrate in Photobioreactor Cultivations of Synechocystis sp. Using an Ultrasound-Enhanced ATR-FTIR Spectroscopy Probe. Bioengineering 2021, 8 (9) , 129. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering8090129
  15. Stephan Freitag, Bettina Baumgartner, Stefan Radel, Andreas Schwaighofer, Antonio Varriale, Angela Pennacchio, Sabato D'Auria, Bernhard Lendl. A thermoelectrically stabilized aluminium acoustic trap combined with attenuated total reflection infrared spectroscopy for detection of Escherichia coli in water. Lab on a Chip 2021, 21 (9) , 1811-1819. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0LC01264E
  16. Jens Kastenhofer, Vignesh Rajamanickam, Julian Libiseller-Egger, Oliver Spadiut. Monitoring and control of E. coli cell integrity. Journal of Biotechnology 2021, 329 , 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2021.01.009
  17. Jens Kastenhofer, Julian Libiseller-Egger, Vignesh Rajamanickam, Oliver Spadiut. Monitoring E. coli Cell Integrity by ATR-FTIR Spectroscopy and Chemometrics: Opportunities and Caveats. Processes 2021, 9 (3) , 422. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9030422
  18. Areej Elmheidi Elbakush, Didem Güven. Evaluation of ethanol tolerance in relation to intracellular storage compounds of Saccharomyces cerevisiae using FT-IR spectroscopy. Process Biochemistry 2021, 101 , 266-273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2020.11.028
  19. Andreas Schwaighofer, Sarah Ablasser, Laurin Lux, Julian Kopp, Christoph Herwig, Oliver Spadiut, Bernhard Lendl, Christoph Slouka. Production of Active Recombinant Hyaluronidase Inclusion Bodies from Apis mellifera in E. coli Bl21(DE3) and characterization by FT-IR Spectroscopy. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2020, 21 (11) , 3881. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21113881
  20. Bettina Baumgartner, Stephan Freitag, Christoph Gasser, Bernhard Lendl. A pocket-sized 3D-printed attenuated total reflection-infrared filtometer combined with functionalized silica films for nitrate sensing in water. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical 2020, 310 , 127847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2020.127847
  21. Jie Liu, Hong Cheng, Xiaoyi Lv, Zhaoxia Zhang, Xiangxiang Zheng, Guohua Wu, Jun Tang, Xiaorong Ma, Xiaxia Yue. Use of FT-IR spectroscopy combined with SVM as a screening tool to identify invasive ductal carcinoma in breast cancer. Optik 2020, 204 , 164225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2020.164225
  22. Rudolf W. Kessler, Waltraud Kessler. Best Practice and Performance of Hardware in Process Analytical Technology (PAT). 2020, 237-274. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-409547-2.14611-6
  23. L. V. Bel’skaya. Use of IR Spectroscopy in Cancer Diagnosis. A Review. Journal of Applied Spectroscopy 2019, 86 (2) , 187-205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10812-019-00800-w
  24. Marissa E. Morales-Rodriguez, Joanna McFarlane, Michelle K. Kidder. Quantum Cascade Laser Infrared Spectroscopy for Online Monitoring of Hydroxylamine Nitrate. International Journal of Analytical Chemistry 2018, 2018 , 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7896903
  25. Michael Podevin, Ioannis A. Fotidis, Irini Angelidaki. Microalgal process-monitoring based on high-selectivity spectroscopy tools: status and future perspectives. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology 2018, 38 (5) , 704-718. https://doi.org/10.1080/07388551.2017.1398132
  26. Stephan Freitag, Andreas Schwaighofer, Stefan Radel, Bernhard Lendl, , . Towards ultrasound enhanced mid-IR spectroscopy for sensing bacteria in aqueous solutions. 2018, 22. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2290390
  27. Fatemeh Elmi, Afshin Fayyaz Movaghar, Maryam Mitra Elmi, Heshmatollah Alinezhad, Novin Nikbakhsh. Application of FT-IR spectroscopy on breast cancer serum analysis. Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy 2017, 187 , 87-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2017.06.021
  28. Gergely Kosa, Volha Shapaval, Achim Kohler, Boris Zimmermann. FTIR spectroscopy as a unified method for simultaneous analysis of intra- and extracellular metabolites in high-throughput screening of microbial bioprocesses. Microbial Cell Factories 2017, 16 (1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-017-0817-3
  29. Ademola O. Olaniran, Lettisha Hiralal, Mduduzi P. Mokoena, Balakrishna Pillay. Flavour-active volatile compounds in beer: production, regulation and control. Journal of the Institute of Brewing 2017, 123 (1) , 13-23. https://doi.org/10.1002/jib.389
  30. Cosima Koch, Andreas E. Posch, Christoph Herwig, Bernhard Lendl. Comparison of Fiber Optic and Conduit Attenuated Total Reflection (ATR) Fourier Transform Infrared (FT-IR) Setup for In-Line Fermentation Monitoring. Applied Spectroscopy 2016, 70 (12) , 1965-1973. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003702816662618
  31. Julian Haas, Boris Mizaikoff. Advances in Mid-Infrared Spectroscopy for Chemical Analysis. Annual Review of Analytical Chemistry 2016, 9 (1) , 45-68. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anchem-071015-041507
  32. Liang Zhao, Hsu‐Yuan Fu, Weichang Zhou, Wei‐Shou Hu. Advances in process monitoring tools for cell culture bioprocesses. Engineering in Life Sciences 2015, 15 (5) , 459-468. https://doi.org/10.1002/elsc.201500006

Analytical Chemistry

Cite this: Anal. Chem. 2015, 87, 4, 2314–2320
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/ac504126v
Published January 12, 2015

Copyright © 2015 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under CC-BY.

Article Views

1891

Altmetric

-

Citations

Learn about these metrics

Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.

  • Abstract

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. Schematic (a) and photograph (b) of the prototype probe: commercial ATR probe and the custom-built ultrasound accessory. (c) The two operating modes. The cells and the evanescent field are magnified by a factor of 10 in comparison to the other dimensions for visibility.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. In-line spectra acquired during S. cerevisiae fermentation when applying retracting frequency (top) or pushing frequency (middle) and their difference spectrum showing typical spectral features of yeast cells.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. (a) CO2 off-gas and biomass over the course of the batch phase. (b) ATR FT-IR spectra of the medium (i.e., retracting frequency applied) over the course of the batch phase.

    Figure 4

    Figure 4. (a) Spectra of dried S. cerevisiae acquired off-line using a laboratory FT-IR microscope (normalized to amide I band). (b) Spectra of S. cerevisiae acquired in-line using the ultrasound-enhanced mid-IR ATR probe at the times when samples for off-line analysis were drawn.

    Figure 5

    Figure 5. (a) Spectra of major carbohydrates present in yeast cells (off-line ATR, in solution) and spectra of yeast cells acquired in-line over the course of the fermentation. (b) Second-derivative spectra of major carbohydrates present in yeast cells and of yeast cells acquired over the course of the fermentation, respectively. In both graphs, carbohydrate spectra are offset for better visibility.

    Figure 6

    Figure 6. Second-derivative spectra of trehalose, glycogen, glucose, and mannan and PC1 of spectra acquired during N-limited growth.

  • References


    This article references 47 other publications.

    1. 1
      Griffiths, P. R.; de Haseth, J. A. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectrometry, 2nd ed.; Wiley-Interscience: Hoboken, NJ, 2007; pp 321 348.
    2. 2
      Lourenço, N. D.; Lopes, J. A.; Almeida, C. F.; Sarraguça, M. C.; Pinheiro, H. M. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2012, 404, 1211 1237
    3. 3
      Landgrebe, D.; Haake, C.; Höpfner, T.; Beutel, S.; Hitzmann, B.; Scheper, T.; Rhiel, M.; Reardon, K. F. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010, 88, 11 22
    4. 4
      Dupuy, N.; Duponchel, L.; Huvenne, J. P.; Sombret, B.; Legrand, P. Food Chem. 1996, 51, 245 251
    5. 5
      Briandet, R.; Kemsley, E. K.; Wilson, R. H. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1996, 44, 170 174
    6. 6
      Lin, M.; Al-Holy, M.; Al-Qadiri, H.; Kang, D.-H.; Cavinato, A. G.; Huang, Y.; Rasco, B. A. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2004, 52, 5769 5772
    7. 7
      Sivakesava, S.; Irudayaraj, J.; Ali, D. Process Biochem. 2001, 37, 371 378
    8. 8
      Franco, V. G.; Perín, J. C.; Mantovani, V. E.; Goicoechea, H. C. Talanta 2006, 68, 1005 1012
    9. 9
      Roychoudhury, P.; Harvey, L. M.; McNeil, B. Anal. Chim. Acta 2006, 561, 218 224
    10. 10
      Roychoudhury, P.; McNeil, B.; Harvey, L. M. Anal. Chim. Acta 2007, 585, 246 252
    11. 11
      Kansiz, M.; Gapes, J. R.; McNaughton, D.; Lendl, B.; Schuster, K. C. Anal. Chim. Acta 2001, 438, 175 186
    12. 12
      Mazarevica, G.; Diewok, J.; Baena, J. R.; Rosenberg, E.; Lendl, B. Appl. Spectrosc. 2004, 58, 804 810
    13. 13
      Schenk, J.; Marison, I. W.; von Stockar, U. J. Biotechnol. 2007, 128, 344 353
    14. 14
      Schenk, J.; Marison, I. W.; von Stockar, U. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2008, 100, 82 93
    15. 15
      Doak, D. L.; Phillips, J. A. Biotechnol. Prog. 1999, 15, 529 539
    16. 16
      Pollard, D.; Buccino, R.; Connors, N.; Kirschner, T.; Olewinski, R.; Saini, K.; Salmon, P. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 2001, 24, 13 24
    17. 17
      Kornmann, H.; Rhiel, M.; Cannizzaro, C.; Marison, I.; von Stockar, U. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2003, 82, 702 709
    18. 18
      Kornmann, H.; Valentinotti, S.; Duboc, P.; Marison, I.; von Stockar, U. J. Biotechnol. 2004, 113, 231 245
    19. 19
      Dahlbacka, J.; Weegar, J.; von Weymarn, N.; Fagervik, K. Biotechnol. Lett. 2012, 34, 1009 1017
    20. 20
      Koch, C.; Posch, A. E.; Goicoechea, H. C.; Herwig, C.; Lendl, B. Anal. Chim. Acta 2014, 807, 103 110
    21. 21
      Kansiz, M.; Billman-Jacobe, H.; McNaughton, D. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2000, 66, 3415 3420
    22. 22
      Stehfest, K.; Toepel, J.; Wilhelm, C. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2005, 43, 717 726
    23. 23
      Dean, A. P.; Sigee, D. C.; Estrada, B.; Pittman, J. K. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101, 4499 4507
    24. 24
      Wagner, H.; Liu, Z.; Langner, U.; Stehfest, K.; Wilhelm, C. J. Biophotonics 2010, 3, 557 566
    25. 25
      Winder, C. L.; Cornmell, R.; Schuler, S.; Jarvis, R. M.; Stephens, G. M.; Goodacre, R. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2011, 399, 387 401
    26. 26
      Scholz, T.; Lopes, V. V.; Calado, C. R. C. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2012, 109, 2279 2285
    27. 27
      Corte, L.; Rellini, P.; Roscini, L.; Fatichenti, F.; Cardinali, G. Anal. Chim. Acta 2010, 659, 258 265
    28. 28
      Burattini, E.; Cavagna, M.; Dell’Anna, R.; Malvezzi Campeggi, F.; Monti, F.; Rossi, F.; Torriani, S. Vib. Spectrosc. 2008, 47, 139 147
    29. 29
      Cavagna, M.; Dell’Anna, R.; Monti, F.; Rossi, F.; Torriani, S. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010, 58, 39 45
    30. 30
      Kuligowski, J.; Quintás, G.; Herwig, C.; Lendl, B. Talanta 2012, 99, 566 573
    31. 31
      Plata, M. R.; Koch, C.; Wechselberger, P.; Herwig, C.; Lendl, B. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2013, 405, 8241 8250
    32. 32
      Jarute, G.; Kainz, A.; Schroll, G.; Baena, J. R.; Lendl, B. Anal. Chem. 2004, 76, 6353 6358
    33. 33
      King, L. V. Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 1934, 147, 212 240
    34. 34
      Yosioka, K.; Kawasima, Y. Acustica 1955, 5, 167 173
    35. 35
      Gor’kov, L. P. Phys.–Dokl. 1962, 6, 773 775
    36. 36
      Radel, S.; McLoughlin, A. J.; Gherardini, L.; Doblhoff-Dier, O.; Benes, E. Ultrasonics 2000, 38, 633 637
    37. 37
      Wiklund, M. Lab Chip 2012, 12, 2018 2028
    38. 38
      Trampler, F.; Sonderhoff, S. A.; Pui, P. W. S.; Kilburn, D. G.; Piret, J. M. Nat. Biotechnol. 1994, 12, 281 284
    39. 39
      Gorenflo, V. M.; Smith, L.; Dedinsky, B.; Persson, B.; Piret, J. M. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2002, 80, 438 444
    40. 40
      Gorenflo, V. M.; Ritter, J. B.; Aeschliman, D. S.; Drouin, H.; Bowen, B. D.; Piret, J. M. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2005, 90, 746 753
    41. 41
      Radel, S.; Schnöller, J.; Gröschl, M.; Benes, E.; Lendl, B. IEEE Sens. J. 2010, 10, 1615 1622
    42. 42
      Lendl, B.; Radel, S.; Brandstetter, M. Device for FTIR Absorption Spectroscopy. PCT/AT2010/000006, 2010.
    43. 43
      Radel, S.; Brandstetter, M.; Lendl, B. Ultrasonics 2010, 50, 240 246
    44. 44
      Koch, C.; Brandstetter, M.; Lendl, B.; Radel, S. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2013, 39, 1094 1101
    45. 45
      Socrates, G. Infrared and Raman Characteristic Group Frequencies: Tables and Charts, 3rd ed.; Wiley & Sons Ltd: New York, 2001.
    46. 46
      Naumann, D.; Helm, D.; Labischinski, H. Nature 1991, 351, 81 82
    47. 47
      Gherardini, L.; Radel, S.; Sielemann, S.; Doblhoff-Dier, O.; Gröschl, M.; Benes, E.; McLoughlin, A. Bioseparation 2001, 10, 153 162
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information


    Experimental details on media preparation and cultivation conditions. Table S1: Overview of the setup and conditions of the fed-batch fermentations. Figure S1: Spectra of S. cerevisiae acquired in-line during batch phase fermentation. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.