Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

You’ve supercharged your research process with ACS and Mendeley!

STEP 1:
Click to create an ACS ID

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

MENDELEY PAIRING EXPIRED
Your Mendeley pairing has expired. Please reconnect
ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
Site-Preferential Dissociation of Peptides with Active Chemical Modification for Improving Fragment Ion Detection
My Activity
  • Free to Read
Letter

Site-Preferential Dissociation of Peptides with Active Chemical Modification for Improving Fragment Ion Detection
Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

View Author Information
Department of Chemistry, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269
* Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Open PDFSupporting Information (1)

Analytical Chemistry

Cite this: Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 1, 23–27
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/ac902120k
Published November 11, 2009

Copyright © 2009 American Chemical Society. This publication is available under these Terms of Use.

Abstract

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Multiple reaction monitoring tandem mass spectrometry becomes an important strategy for measuring protein targets in complex biomatrixes. Active chemical modification of peptides like phenylthiocarbamoylation has unique potential for improving the measurement. This potential is enabled by active participation of a modifying group in site-preferential dissociation of modified peptides, which produces certain fragment ions at very high yields and in a sequence-independent manner. In this work, a novel combination of energy-resolved mass spectrometry with substituent effect investigation is used to analyze important factors that control the specificity of the site-preferential dissociation of phenylthiocarbamoyl peptides. On the basis of the linear correlation between collision energy and the Hammett constant as well as computational studies, it is found that the initial enhanced capture of a mobile proton and the subsequent, site-directed intramolecular proton transfer are important to the high yields (∼70−90%) for producing two types of fragment ions of phenylthiocarbamoyl peptides: the modified b1 ion and the complementary yn−1 ion. This understanding will help the design of new modification reagents. When integrated with the throughput and the signal-enhancing potential of peptide modification, active chemical modification of peptides will significantly advance mass spectrometry-based, targeted proteome analysis.

This publication is licensed for personal use by The American Chemical Society.

Copyright © 2009 American Chemical Society

After a decade of fast advance in proteomics, one important task for protein measurements is to efficiently monitor and quantify target proteins in complex biomatrixes. These targets are accumulated from conventional biochemical and biological investigations as well as from discovery proteome profiling experiments. Targeting a specific set of proteins for focused mass spectrometry is an increasingly attractive strategy for proteome-wide quantitative investigation of biological pathways and cellular signal transduction, as well as for monitoring of human disease biomarkers. (1-8) Multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) and its variations are often the methods of choice, which use signature peptides as surrogate markers for their precursor proteins. (1-8) MRM MS/MS uses a particular gas-phase reaction(s) for measuring a peptide, and thus its detection limit depends on both the signal intensity of the precursor and that of a selected fragment ion(s) of the peptide. An intact peptide that has a strong signal, however, does not necessarily produce fragments at high yields due to multiple fragment pathways for activated peptide ions. (9-11) Amino acid composition and sequence needed for efficient generation of intact peptide ions and for effective production of fragment ions are not necessarily the same. A compromise between signal intensities for precursor and fragment ions has often been made during signature peptide selection in MRM MS/MS experimental design, which results in less-than-optimal detection limits. Furthermore, signature peptides for MRM measurements, (5) even those with bonds capable of biased fragmentation, (12, 13) typically produce the corresponding fragment ions at yields less than 10%. These challenges in selecting signature peptides can be significant. For instance, small target proteins can only generate a few peptides without bonds of preferential fragmentation potential.

Active chemical modification (14) of peptides provides a promising, universal solution for generating fragmentation ions at high yields for enhancing the detection and quantitation limits for MRM MS/MS. This is a chemical modification approach; (15) a modifying group actively participates in controlling the specificity of gas-phase peptide bond dissociation, which produces particular fragment ions at very high yields. Importantly, the bond dissociation has little dependence on peptide amino acid composition and sequence and this eliminates the need of searching for signature peptides with biased fragmentation potential. This independency on peptide sequence for high yield fragment ion generation releases the fragment ion signal as the limiting factor for the detection limit for MRM MS/MS analysis. Active chemical modification has a well-known example, phenylthiocarbamoylation, although its applications in MRM MS/MS of peptides have not been broadly exploited. Phenylthiocarbamoyl peptides provide a system for examining important factors that need to be considered in design of new reagents for active chemical modification of peptides for MRM measurements. Upon random gas-phase collision, (11) the fragmentation of N-terminally modified phenylthiocarbamoyl peptides can be highly specific to the first N-terminal peptide bond. (14, 16-22) This specificity has been solely attributed to the high nucleophilicity of the thioxo sulfur atom, relative to amide oxygen atoms on the same peptide. (16, 17, 23) The role of the high gas-phase basicity of the thioxo sulfur (24) in the specificity control has not been examined.

Activation of amide bonds by a mobile proton facilitates gas-phase collision-induced dissociation of peptides, an important process for peptide mass spectrometry. (9-11) In analogy to the mechanism for the preferential cleavage at the C-side amide bond of histidine, (25) a triad mechanism (Scheme 1) is proposed to test if site-directed protonation of the first amide bond is essential to the selectivity control for dissociation of phenylthiocarbamoyl peptides. This mechanism has three sequential steps: (A) enhanced capture of a mobile proton (9) by the basic thioxo sulfur (24) that acts as an initial “proton antenna” (1 to 2); (B) intramolecular transfer of the trapped proton to the adjacent peptide bond (2 to 3), which results in the site-specific activation of the first N-terminal peptide bond; (C) nucleophilic attack of the activated amide group by the deprotonated thioxo sulfur atom (from 3 to b1 and yn−1). (16, 17) Herein, we report a novel use of energy-resolved mass spectrometry for detecting the site-directed localization of a mobile proton in ring-substituted phenylthiocarbamoyl peptides.

Scheme 1

Peptide NSILTETLHR of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator protein was modified by reacting it with various ring-substituted phenylisothiocyanates (Figure 1a) following a reported procedure. (22) Tandem mass spectra of the modified peptides showed the preferential cleavage of the first N-terminal amide bond (Figure S1 in the Supporting Information). The modified b1 and the complementary y9 ions (Scheme 1) for the 4-iodophenylthiocarbamoyl peptide were dominantly observed (Figure S1 in the Supporting Information) and their maximum MRM MS/MS yields were measured to be 89% and 67%, respectively, by energy-resolved mass spectrometry (Figure 2) on a triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometer (ABI 4000 QTrap). The yields were calculated based on the percentages of the maximal relative intensities for the MRM transitions of [M + 2H]2+ → b, (y9 or y7) over [M + 2H]2+ → [M + 2H]2+, respectively. High yields for producing the modified b1 ion and the complementary yn−1 from phenylthiocarbamoyl peptides are beneficial to MRM measurements of target peptides in protein digests (Figure S2 in the Supporting Information).

Figure 1

Figure 1. Substituent effect on gas-phase dissociation of ring-substituted phenylthiocarbamoyl peptides. The structure (a) shows the modified peptides with two protons, one at the cleavable peptide bond and the other at the C-terminal arginine; only the first two amino acid residues are illustrated. Part b is an overlay of multiple collision energy profiles for producing the y9 ion from a modified peptide with the maximal collision energy (CEmax) located.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Energy-resolved mass spectrometry comparison of yields for fragment ions generated from a 4-iodophenylthiocarbamoyl peptide with a sequence of NSILTETLHR. Ion transitions include [M + 2H]2+/[M + 2H]2+ (maximum yield, 100%; normalization standard), [M + 2H]2+/b1* (maximum yield, 89%), [M + 2H]2+/y9 (maximum yield, 67%) and [M + 2H]2+/y7 (maximum yield, 5%).

Energy-resolved dissociation of all of the ring-substituted phenylthiocarbamoyl peptides was monitored. The dependence of signal intensity on the collision energy offset voltage (CE) for the collision cell was monitored for the singly charged y9 ion (SILTETLHR, theoretical m/z 1069.6005), which is common to all of the modified peptides. Replicated experiments (12−101 times on multiple days and multiple sample preparations) were conducted for each modified peptide. The CE profiles for the y9 ion for a particular modified peptide were first normalized, separately, to their own approximate average maximum CE values [obtained from the Gaussian fitting of the profiles using Origin 8 (OriginLab, MA)]. All of the normalized CE profiles for the modified peptide were then combined. A defined range [from the top 50% data for the lower CE end (left) of the profile and the top 80% data for the higher CE end (right)] of data in the combined CE profile, as in Figure S3 in the Supporting Information, were fitted with an asymmetric double sigmoid function using Origin 8. The CE value corresponding to the maximal ion intensity was designated as CEmax for the peptide (Figure 1b and Figure S3 in the Supporting Information). Calculated CEmax had high precision; when the error for a CEmax was smaller than 0.1 V (the step size for CE increase for the collision cell in the energy-resolved experiments), 0.1 V was used as the experimental error for the laboratory CEmax values.

Hammett constants for substituents (26) on the phenyl ring were correlated with laboratory CEmax values for the y9 ion (Figure 3). A linear relationship was established based on all meta substituents (Y or Z substituents, Figure 1a), giving a positive slope of 5.1(±0.8). Substituents 4-dimethylamino (a, Figure 3) and 4-diethylamino (b, Figure 3) had significant positive deviations from the linear regression. The CE profile for the y9 ion is the competitive sum of the CE dependencies on the ion generation and on further dissociation of the ion. Values for CEmax are used as relative measurements, by the first approximation, of the dissociation of the first N-terminal amide bond. This approximation is based on the following considerations. First, fragments generated from competing dissociation pathways other than the first N-terminal amide dissociation are minimal; they are y92+ ion and a doubly charged peptide ion losing the modifying group (Figures S1 and S4 in the Supporting Information). Second, the origin of the y9 ion generation is attributed to the primary cleavage of the first N-terminal peptide bond, and the y9 ion is the common fragment for all of the modified peptides. Simpler model systems, however, are needed to further analyze contributing factors to the observed CEmax values, including differences in the peptide mass and vibrational degree of freedom.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Correlation of laboratory CEmax with the Hammett constant. Substituent a, 4-dimethylamino; b, 4-diethylamino; c, 4-methoxy; d, 4-ethoxy; e, 3,4-dimethoxy; f, 3,5-dimethyl; g, 3-methyl; h, unsubstituted; i, 3,4,5-trimethoxy; j, 3-methoxy; k, 3-methylthio; l, 4-iodo; m, 3-iodo; n, 3-bromo; o, 3-chloro; p, 3-methoxycarbamoyl; q, 4-methoxycarbonyl; r, 3-cyano; s, 4-cyano; t, 3-nitro; and u, 4-nitro. The circle labels are for para substituents: solid red for strong resonance electron-donating and open blue for resonance electron-withdrawing. The solid squares are for meta substituents.

The positive slope of the linear correlation for the y9 ion (Figure 3) supports the importance of the previously proposed, thioxo sulfur nucleophilicity in enhancing fragmentation of the first peptide bond in phenylthiocarbamoyl peptides (3). (16, 17) The presence of the less electron-withdrawing substituent (i.e., the decreased Hammett constant) makes the thioxo sulfur a stronger nucleophile for intramolecular attack of the successive peptide bond to form 4, which results in the decreased CEmax. The high nucleophilicity of thioxo sulfur has also been accounted for the preferential cleavage in thioxo peptides. (27)

Substituents 4-dimethylamino and 4-diethylamino, capable of strong electron-donating stabilization through resonance, were selected as the probes for differentiating the substituent effect on the intramolecular proton transfer (2 to 3, Scheme 1) from that on the nucleophilic attack (3 to 4). These two processes have opposite substituent effects. Electron-donating resonance groups prohibit the proton transfer, decrease the peptide bond cleavage, and increase CEmax. On the other hand, these para substituents enhance the thioxo sulfur nucleophilicity, facilitate the peptide bond cleavage, and decrease CEmax. It would be expected that if the only controlling factor for the site-specific amide bond cleavage were the sulfur nucleophilicity as previously proposed, (16, 17) then these resonance probing substituents would show negative deviations from the linear correlation.

In contrast, considerable positive deviations were observed for 4-dimethylamino and 4-diethylamino substituents (Figure 3) and they revealed the presence of a stabilized, protonated thiocarbamoyl group (Figure S5 in the Supporting Information) in 2b. This resonance stabilization prohibits the intramolecular proton transfer from 2 to 3. The reduced intramolecular proton transfer results in the decreased, site-directed activation of the first amide bond. However, it is important to note that the intramolecular proton transfer from 2 to 3 does not play a sole role in limiting the peptide bond dissociation. Otherwise, a negative slope for the correlation of the CEmax against the Hammett constant would be observed. Thus, combined observations of the positive slope for the correlation and positive deviations of the protonation probing substituents indicate that both 2 to 3 and 3 to 4 (Scheme 1) might be rate-limiting steps for the site-preferential dissociation of phenylthiocarbamoyl peptides. Simpler compounds than the modified peptides used could facilitate further examination of kinetics and mechanisms of gas-phase dissociation of phenylthiocarbamoyl peptides.

The high gas-phase basicity of thioxo sulfur (24) is proposed to be responsible for the initial mobile proton capture by the phenylthiocarbamoyl modifying group in 1 to form 2 (Scheme 1), in competition with other amide groups for the same mobile proton. The substituent effect on the initial sulfur protonation is also qualitatively observed in tandem mass spectra of the modified peptides (Figure S1 in the Supporting Information). Strong electron-withdrawing substituents like 4-nitro on the phenyl ring decrease the sulfur basicity (1) so that the sulfur atom becomes less competitive for the mobile proton to initiate the site-preferential fragmentation. As a result, dissociation products from other pathways increase (Figures S1 and S4 in the Supporting Information). In comparison, the oxygen atom in the modifying group of phenylcarbamoyl peptides is not basic enough to enhance capture of a mobile proton. Therefore, phenylcarbamoyl peptides undergo multiple peptide bond dissociation. (14, 22) Phenylcarbamoylation of peptides is thus referred to as passive chemical modification, in which the modifying group performs as an inert mass tag. (14)

The initial sulfur protonation and subsequent intramolecular proton transfer (1 to 2 to 3 in Scheme 1) are also supported by computational studies of a model compound 2-[3-(4-dimethylamino-phenyl)-ureido]-N-methylcarbamoylmethyl-acetamide. With the use of density functional theory (DFT) with hybrid functional B3LYP and basis set 6-31 g**, relative energies for protonation isomers of the model compound and the transition state (obtained via the linear synchronous transit method) for intramolecular proton transfer were calculated with the Jaguar program. Initial protonation of thioxo sulfur (defined as the zero of energy) is much favorable over that of the adjacent amide oxygen (19.9 kcal/mol, Figure S6 in the Supporting Information). Protonation of the dimethylamino nitrogen also requires higher energy (1.7 kcal/mol). The rotational isomer of the sulfur protonated molecule (0 kcal/mol) forms an intramolecular hydrogen bond with a slightly higher energy (0.5 kcal/mol, Figure S6 in the Supporting Information), which can then transfer the proton to the adjacent amide oxygen (0.3 kcal/mol) through a transition state with a low activation barrier (0.7 kcal/mol, Figure S7 in the Supporting Information).

Chemical manipulation of peptide fragment ion yields or gas-phase peptide dissociation is less explored than chemical enhancement of mass spectral signals for intact peptide ions. Modification of peptides for introducing basic group and/or increasing peptide hydrophobicity has been shown beneficial to enhancing MS signals for intact, modified peptides, (28, 29) which can improve MRM detection limits by increasing signals for precursor peptide ions. Chemical tuning of fragment ion yields for modified peptides requires an “active” involvement of a modifying group in gas-phase dissociation of a modified peptide. In other words, the modifying group participates in gas-phase dissociation of the modified peptide. Peptides modified by phenylthiocarbamoylation of the N-terminal amine with substituted phenylisothiocyanates provide a unique system for understanding principles governing such a chemical tuning of peptide dissociation. Preferential gas-phase cleavage of the first amino acid residue is also commonly observed in peptides modified with reductive alkylation, (30-32) another type of active chemical modification. (14)

In conclusion, this work timely contributes to the area of targeted mass spectrometry, especially MRM measurements, of protein biomarkers. It addresses an important but previously less appreciated issue for improving MRM measurements: how to increase the fragment ion yield. Fragment ion signals and precursor signals, together, define the MRM limits of detection and quantitation. Controllable peptide cleavage as the essence of active chemical modification provides a means to rationally improve the fragment ion yield. Important contributors to this improvement are identified based on a novel application of energy-resolved mass spectrometry. This understanding will help the design and development of new reagents for improved MRM measurements. The scope of active chemical modification can be expanded by integration with the throughput potential of peptide labeling, which enables mass spectrometric analysis of a common analyte in several samples, (33) and the signal-enhancing potential, which increases the mass spectrometric signals for peptides through chemical introduction of signal enhancing moieties. (28, 29) Significant advances in targeted proteome analysis using MRM MS/MS and novel modification reagents are thus foreseeable.

Supporting Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Additional information as noted in the text. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

  • Corresponding Author
    • Xudong Yao - Department of Chemistry, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269 Email: [email protected]
  • Authors
    • Pamela Ann C. Diego - Department of Chemistry, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269
    • Bekim Bajrami - Department of Chemistry, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269
    • Hui Jiang - Department of Chemistry, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269
    • Yu Shi - Department of Chemistry, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269
    • Jose A. Gascon - Department of Chemistry, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269

Acknowledgment

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This work was supported by the University of Connecticut, the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation (Grant YAO07XX0), and Grant IGR-06-002-01 from the American Cancer Society. Fata H. Koudoro supported by the NSF REU program at the University of Connecticut did the preliminary studies. This work was in part presented at the 57th ASMS Conference on Mass Spectrometry and Allied Topics in 2009. The authors thank M. V. Stipdonk for sharing a 57th ASMS poster entitled “Effect of Ring Substituents on the Dissociation Behavior of Model, Benzoic Acid Terminated Peptide and Esters.”

References

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article references 33 other publications.

  1. 1
    Carr, S. A. and Anderson, L. Clin. Chem. 2008, 54, 1749 1752
  2. 2
    Sherman, J., Mckay, M. J., Ashman, K. and Molloy, M. P. Proteomics 2009, 9, 1120 1123
  3. 3
    Duncan, M. W., Yergey, A. L. and Patterson, S. D. Proteomics 2009, 9, 1124 1127
  4. 4
    Gerber, S. A., Rush, J., Stemman, O., Kirschner, M. W. and Gygi, S. P. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2003, 100, 6940 6945
  5. 5
    Anderson, L. and Hunter, C. L. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2006, 5, 573 588
  6. 6
    Wolf-Yadlin, A., Hautaniemi, S., Lauffenburger, D. A. and White, F. M. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2007, 104, 5860 5865
  7. 7
    Keshishian, H., Addona, T., Burgess, M., Kuhn, E. and Carr, S. A. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2007, 6, 2212 2229
  8. 8
    Lange, V., Malmstrom, J. A., Didion, J., King, N. L., Johansson, B. P., Schafer, J., Rameseder, J., Wong, C. H., Deutsch, E. W., Brusniak, M. Y., Buhlmann, P., Bjorck, L., Domon, B. and Aebersold, R. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2008, 7, 1489 1500
  9. 9
    Wysocki, V. H., Tsaprailis, G., Smith, L. L. and Breci, L. A. J. Mass Spectrom. 2000, 35, 1399 1406
  10. 10
    Bleiholder, C., Osburn, S., Williams, T. D., Suhai, S., Van Stipdonk, M., Harrison, A. G. and Paizs, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 17774 17789
  11. 11
    Wells, J. M. and McLuckey, S. A. Methods Enzymol. 2005, 402, 148 185
  12. 12
    Huang, Y., Triscari, J. M., Tseng, G. C., Pasa-Tolic, L., Lipton, M. S., Smith, R. D. and Wysocki, V. H. Anal. Chem. 2005, 77, 5800 5813
  13. 13
    Huang, Y., Tseng, G. C., Yuan, S., Pasa-Tolic, L., Lipton, M. S., Smith, R. D. and Wysocki, V. H. J. Proteome Res. 2008, 7, 70 79
  14. 14
    Shi, Y., Bajrami, B. and Yao, X. Anal. Chem. 2009, 81, 6438 6448
  15. 15
    Regnier, F. E. and Julka, S. Proteomics 2006, 6, 3968 3979
  16. 16
    Summerfield, S. G., Bolgar, M. S. and Gaskell, S. J. J. Mass Spectrom. 1997, 32, 225 231
  17. 17
    Summerfield, S. G., Steen, H., O’Malley, M. and Gaskell, S. J. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 1999, 188, 95 103
  18. 18
    Yalcin, T., Gabryelski, W. and Li, L. J. Mass Spectrom. 1998, 33, 543 553
  19. 19
    Van Der Rest, G., He, F., Emmett, M. R., Marshall, A. G. and Gaskell, S. J. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2001, 12, 288 295
  20. 20
    Wang, D., Kalume, D., Pickart, C., Pandey, A. and Cotter, R. J. Anal. Chem. 2006, 78, 3681 3687
  21. 21
    Wang, D., Fang, S. and Wohlhueter, R. M. Anal. Chem. 2009, 81, 1893 1900
  22. 22
    Yao, X., Diego, P., Ramos, A. A. and Shi, Y. Anal. Chem. 2008, 80, 7383 7391
  23. 23
    Savitski, M. M., Kjeldsen, F., Nielsen, M. L., Garbuzynskiy, S. O., Galzitskaya, O. V., Surin, A. K. and Zubarev, R. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 1481 1484
  24. 24
    Abboud, J. L. M., Mo, O., De Paz, J. L. G., Yanez, M., Esseffar, M., Bouab, W., El-Mouhtadi, M., Mokhlisse, R. and Ballesteros, E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 12468 12476
  25. 25
    Tsaprailis, G., Nair, H., Zhong, W., Kuppannan, K., Futrell, J. H. and Wysocki, V. H. Anal. Chem. 2004, 76, 2083 2094
  26. 26
    Hansch, C., Leo, A. and Taft, R. W. Chem. Rev. 1991, 91, 165 195
  27. 27
    Pfeifer, T., Schierhorn, A., Friedemann, R., Jakob, M., Frank, R., Schutkowski, M. and Fischer, G. J. Mass Spectrom. 1997, 32, 1064 1071
  28. 28
    Mirzaei, H. and Regnier, F. Anal. Chem. 2006, 78, 4175 4183
  29. 29
    Williams, D. K., Jr., Meadows, C. W., Bori, I. D., Hawkridge, A. M., Comins, D. L. and Muddiman, D. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 2122 2123
  30. 30
    Hsu, J.-L., Huang, S.-Y., Shiea, J.-T., Huang, W.-Y. and Chen, S.-H. J. Proteome Res. 2005, 4, 101 108
  31. 31
    Fu, Q. and Li, L. Anal. Chem. 2005, 77, 7783 7795
  32. 32
    Locke, S. J., Leslie, A. D., Melanson, J. E. and Pinto, D. M. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2006, 20, 1525 1530
  33. 33
    Desouza, L. V., Taylor, A. M., Li, W., Minkoff, M. S., Romaschin, A. D., Colgan, T. J. and Siu, K. W. J. Proteome Res. 2008, 7, 3525 3534

Cited By

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article is cited by 11 publications.

  1. Yuanyuan Shen, Reza Nemati, Lei Wang, and Xudong Yao . Determining Linear Free Energy Relationships in Peptide Fragmentation Using Derivatization and Targeted Mass Spectrometry. Analytical Chemistry 2018, 90 (3) , 1587-1594. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.7b02191
  2. Adam J. McShane, Yuanyuan Shen, Mary Joan Castillo, Xudong Yao. Peptide Dimethylation: Fragmentation Control via Distancing the Dimethylamino Group. Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry 2014, 25 (10) , 1694-1704. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13361-014-0951-7
  3. Yasset Perez-Riverol, Aniel Sánchez, Jesus Noda, Diogo Borges, Paulo Costa Carvalho, Rui Wang, Juan Antonio Vizcaíno, Lázaro Betancourt, Yassel Ramos, Gabriel Duarte, Fabio C.S. Nogueira, Luis J. González, Gabriel Padrón, David L. Tabb, Henning Hermjakob, Gilberto B. Domont, and Vladimir Besada . HI-Bone: A Scoring System for Identifying Phenylisothiocyanate-Derivatized Peptides Based on Precursor Mass and High Intensity Fragment Ions. Analytical Chemistry 2013, 85 (7) , 3515-3520. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac303239g
  4. Xudong Yao . Derivatization or Not: A Choice in Quantitative Proteomics. Analytical Chemistry 2011, 83 (12) , 4427-4439. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac200925p
  5. Jiapeng Leng, Haoyang Wang, Li Zhang, Jing Zhang, Hang Wang, Tingting Cai, Jinting Yao, Yinlong Guo. Integration of High Accuracy N-Terminus Identification in Peptide Sequencing and Comparative Protein Analysis Via Isothiocyanate-Based Isotope Labeling Reagent with ESI Ion-trap TOF MS. Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry 2011, 22 (7) https://doi.org/10.1007/s13361-011-0129-5
  6. Aniel Sanchez, Yasset Perez-Riverol, Luis Javier González, Jesus Noda, Lazaro Betancourt, Yassel Ramos, Jeovanis Gil, Roberto Vera, Gabriel Padrón, and Vladimir Besada . Evaluation of Phenylthiocarbamoyl-Derivatized Peptides by Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry: Selective Isolation and Analysis of Modified Multiply Charged Peptides for Liquid Chromatography−Tandem Mass Spectrometry Experiments. Analytical Chemistry 2010, 82 (20) , 8492-8501. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac1012738
  7. Xudong Yao, Bekim Bajrami and Yu Shi. Ultrathroughput Multiple Reaction Monitoring Mass Spectrometry. Analytical Chemistry 2010, 82 (3) , 794-797. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac9026274
  8. Clodette Punzalan, Lei Wang, Bekim Bajrami, Xudong Yao. Measurement and utilization of the proteomic reactivity by mass spectrometry. Mass Spectrometry Reviews 2024, 43 (1) , 166-192. https://doi.org/10.1002/mas.21837
  9. Fedor Kryuchkov, Thiago Verano-Braga, Frank Kjeldsen. N-terminal sequence tagging using reliably determined b2 ions: A useful approach to deconvolute tandem mass spectra of co-fragmented peptides in proteomics. Journal of Proteomics 2014, 103 , 254-260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprot.2014.03.039
  10. E. S. Simon, P. G. Papoulias, P. C. Andrews. Selective collision‐induced fragmentation of ortho ‐hydroxybenzyl‐aminated lysyl‐containing tryptic peptides. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry 2013, 27 (14) , 1619-1630. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.6611
  11. E. S. Simon, P. G. Papoulias, P. C. Andrews. Substituent effects on the gas‐phase fragmentation reactions of protonated peptides containing benzylamine‐derivatized lysyl residues. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry 2012, 26 (6) , 631-638. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.6141
Open PDF

Analytical Chemistry

Cite this: Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 1, 23–27
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/ac902120k
Published November 11, 2009

Copyright © 2009 American Chemical Society. This publication is available under these Terms of Use.

Article Views

1199

Altmetric

-

Citations

Learn about these metrics

Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.

  • Scheme 1

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. Substituent effect on gas-phase dissociation of ring-substituted phenylthiocarbamoyl peptides. The structure (a) shows the modified peptides with two protons, one at the cleavable peptide bond and the other at the C-terminal arginine; only the first two amino acid residues are illustrated. Part b is an overlay of multiple collision energy profiles for producing the y9 ion from a modified peptide with the maximal collision energy (CEmax) located.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. Energy-resolved mass spectrometry comparison of yields for fragment ions generated from a 4-iodophenylthiocarbamoyl peptide with a sequence of NSILTETLHR. Ion transitions include [M + 2H]2+/[M + 2H]2+ (maximum yield, 100%; normalization standard), [M + 2H]2+/b1* (maximum yield, 89%), [M + 2H]2+/y9 (maximum yield, 67%) and [M + 2H]2+/y7 (maximum yield, 5%).

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. Correlation of laboratory CEmax with the Hammett constant. Substituent a, 4-dimethylamino; b, 4-diethylamino; c, 4-methoxy; d, 4-ethoxy; e, 3,4-dimethoxy; f, 3,5-dimethyl; g, 3-methyl; h, unsubstituted; i, 3,4,5-trimethoxy; j, 3-methoxy; k, 3-methylthio; l, 4-iodo; m, 3-iodo; n, 3-bromo; o, 3-chloro; p, 3-methoxycarbamoyl; q, 4-methoxycarbonyl; r, 3-cyano; s, 4-cyano; t, 3-nitro; and u, 4-nitro. The circle labels are for para substituents: solid red for strong resonance electron-donating and open blue for resonance electron-withdrawing. The solid squares are for meta substituents.

  • References


    This article references 33 other publications.

    1. 1
      Carr, S. A. and Anderson, L. Clin. Chem. 2008, 54, 1749 1752
    2. 2
      Sherman, J., Mckay, M. J., Ashman, K. and Molloy, M. P. Proteomics 2009, 9, 1120 1123
    3. 3
      Duncan, M. W., Yergey, A. L. and Patterson, S. D. Proteomics 2009, 9, 1124 1127
    4. 4
      Gerber, S. A., Rush, J., Stemman, O., Kirschner, M. W. and Gygi, S. P. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2003, 100, 6940 6945
    5. 5
      Anderson, L. and Hunter, C. L. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2006, 5, 573 588
    6. 6
      Wolf-Yadlin, A., Hautaniemi, S., Lauffenburger, D. A. and White, F. M. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2007, 104, 5860 5865
    7. 7
      Keshishian, H., Addona, T., Burgess, M., Kuhn, E. and Carr, S. A. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2007, 6, 2212 2229
    8. 8
      Lange, V., Malmstrom, J. A., Didion, J., King, N. L., Johansson, B. P., Schafer, J., Rameseder, J., Wong, C. H., Deutsch, E. W., Brusniak, M. Y., Buhlmann, P., Bjorck, L., Domon, B. and Aebersold, R. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2008, 7, 1489 1500
    9. 9
      Wysocki, V. H., Tsaprailis, G., Smith, L. L. and Breci, L. A. J. Mass Spectrom. 2000, 35, 1399 1406
    10. 10
      Bleiholder, C., Osburn, S., Williams, T. D., Suhai, S., Van Stipdonk, M., Harrison, A. G. and Paizs, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 17774 17789
    11. 11
      Wells, J. M. and McLuckey, S. A. Methods Enzymol. 2005, 402, 148 185
    12. 12
      Huang, Y., Triscari, J. M., Tseng, G. C., Pasa-Tolic, L., Lipton, M. S., Smith, R. D. and Wysocki, V. H. Anal. Chem. 2005, 77, 5800 5813
    13. 13
      Huang, Y., Tseng, G. C., Yuan, S., Pasa-Tolic, L., Lipton, M. S., Smith, R. D. and Wysocki, V. H. J. Proteome Res. 2008, 7, 70 79
    14. 14
      Shi, Y., Bajrami, B. and Yao, X. Anal. Chem. 2009, 81, 6438 6448
    15. 15
      Regnier, F. E. and Julka, S. Proteomics 2006, 6, 3968 3979
    16. 16
      Summerfield, S. G., Bolgar, M. S. and Gaskell, S. J. J. Mass Spectrom. 1997, 32, 225 231
    17. 17
      Summerfield, S. G., Steen, H., O’Malley, M. and Gaskell, S. J. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 1999, 188, 95 103
    18. 18
      Yalcin, T., Gabryelski, W. and Li, L. J. Mass Spectrom. 1998, 33, 543 553
    19. 19
      Van Der Rest, G., He, F., Emmett, M. R., Marshall, A. G. and Gaskell, S. J. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2001, 12, 288 295
    20. 20
      Wang, D., Kalume, D., Pickart, C., Pandey, A. and Cotter, R. J. Anal. Chem. 2006, 78, 3681 3687
    21. 21
      Wang, D., Fang, S. and Wohlhueter, R. M. Anal. Chem. 2009, 81, 1893 1900
    22. 22
      Yao, X., Diego, P., Ramos, A. A. and Shi, Y. Anal. Chem. 2008, 80, 7383 7391
    23. 23
      Savitski, M. M., Kjeldsen, F., Nielsen, M. L., Garbuzynskiy, S. O., Galzitskaya, O. V., Surin, A. K. and Zubarev, R. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 1481 1484
    24. 24
      Abboud, J. L. M., Mo, O., De Paz, J. L. G., Yanez, M., Esseffar, M., Bouab, W., El-Mouhtadi, M., Mokhlisse, R. and Ballesteros, E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 12468 12476
    25. 25
      Tsaprailis, G., Nair, H., Zhong, W., Kuppannan, K., Futrell, J. H. and Wysocki, V. H. Anal. Chem. 2004, 76, 2083 2094
    26. 26
      Hansch, C., Leo, A. and Taft, R. W. Chem. Rev. 1991, 91, 165 195
    27. 27
      Pfeifer, T., Schierhorn, A., Friedemann, R., Jakob, M., Frank, R., Schutkowski, M. and Fischer, G. J. Mass Spectrom. 1997, 32, 1064 1071
    28. 28
      Mirzaei, H. and Regnier, F. Anal. Chem. 2006, 78, 4175 4183
    29. 29
      Williams, D. K., Jr., Meadows, C. W., Bori, I. D., Hawkridge, A. M., Comins, D. L. and Muddiman, D. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 2122 2123
    30. 30
      Hsu, J.-L., Huang, S.-Y., Shiea, J.-T., Huang, W.-Y. and Chen, S.-H. J. Proteome Res. 2005, 4, 101 108
    31. 31
      Fu, Q. and Li, L. Anal. Chem. 2005, 77, 7783 7795
    32. 32
      Locke, S. J., Leslie, A. D., Melanson, J. E. and Pinto, D. M. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2006, 20, 1525 1530
    33. 33
      Desouza, L. V., Taylor, A. M., Li, W., Minkoff, M. S., Romaschin, A. D., Colgan, T. J. and Siu, K. W. J. Proteome Res. 2008, 7, 3525 3534
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information


    Additional information as noted in the text. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.