ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
Analysis of Cation Composition in Dolomites on the Intact Particles Sampled from Asteroid Ryugu
My Activity
  • Open Access
Article

Analysis of Cation Composition in Dolomites on the Intact Particles Sampled from Asteroid Ryugu
Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

  • Mayu Morita
    Mayu Morita
    Analytical Technology Division, Horiba Techno Service Co., Ltd., Kyoto 601-8125, Japan
    More by Mayu Morita
  • Hiroharu Yui*
    Hiroharu Yui
    Department of Chemistry, Tokyo University of Science, Tokyo 162-8601, Japan
    *Email: [email protected]
    More by Hiroharu Yui
  • Shu-hei Urashima
    Shu-hei Urashima
    Department of Chemistry, Tokyo University of Science, Tokyo 162-8601, Japan
  • Morihiko Onose
    Morihiko Onose
    Analytical Technology Division, Horiba Techno Service Co., Ltd., Kyoto 601-8125, Japan
  • Shintaro Komatani
    Shintaro Komatani
    Analytical Technology Division, Horiba Techno Service Co., Ltd., Kyoto 601-8125, Japan
  • Izumi Nakai
    Izumi Nakai
    Department of Applied Chemistry, Tokyo University of Science, Tokyo 162-8601, Japan
    More by Izumi Nakai
  • Yoshinari Abe
    Yoshinari Abe
    Graduate School of Engineering Materials Science and Engineering, Tokyo Denki University, Tokyo 120-8551, Japan
  • Yasuko Terada
    Yasuko Terada
    Spectroscopy and Imaging Division, Japan Synchrotron Radiation Research Institute, Hyogo 679-5198, Japan
  • Hisashi Homma
    Hisashi Homma
    Osaka Application Laboratory, Rigaku Corporation, Osaka 569-1146, Japan
  • Kazuko Motomura
    Kazuko Motomura
    Thermal Analysis Division, Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo 196-8666, Japan
  • Kiyohiro Ichida
    Kiyohiro Ichida
    Analytical Technology Division, Horiba Techno Service Co., Ltd., Kyoto 601-8125, Japan
  • Tetsuya Yokoyama
    Tetsuya Yokoyama
    Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo 152-8551, Japan
  • Kazuhide Nagashima
    Kazuhide Nagashima
    Hawai‘i Institute of Geophysics and Planetology, University of Hawai‘i at Ma̅noa, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822, United States
  • Jérôme Aléon
    Jérôme Aléon
    Institut de Minéralogie, de Physique des Matériaux et de Cosmochimie, Sorbonne Université, Museum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique Unité Mixte de Recherche 7590, Institut de recherche pour le développement, Paris 75005, France
  • Conel M. O’D. Alexander
    Conel M. O’D. Alexander
    Earth and Planets Laboratory, Carnegie Institution for Science, Washington, District of Columbia 20015, United States
  • Sachiko Amari
    Sachiko Amari
    McDonnell Center for the Space Sciences and Physics Department, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri 63130, United States
    Geochemical Research Center, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan
  • Yuri Amelin
    Yuri Amelin
    Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, GD 510640, China
    More by Yuri Amelin
  • Ken-ichi Bajo
    Ken-ichi Bajo
    Department of Natural History Sciences, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 001-0021, Japan
  • Martin Bizzarro
    Martin Bizzarro
    Centre for Star and Planet Formation, Globe Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen K 1350, Denmark
  • Audrey Bouvier
    Audrey Bouvier
    Bayerisches Geoinstitut, Universität Bayreuth, Bayreuth 95447, Germany
  • Richard W. Carlson
    Richard W. Carlson
    Earth and Planets Laboratory, Carnegie Institution for Science, Washington, District of Columbia 20015, United States
  • Marc Chaussidon
    Marc Chaussidon
    Université Paris Cité, Institut de physique du globe de Paris, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Paris 75005, France
  • Byeon-Gak Choi
    Byeon-Gak Choi
    Department of Earth Science Education, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea
  • Nicolas Dauphas
    Nicolas Dauphas
    Department of the Geophysical Sciences and Enrico Fermi Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, United States
  • Andrew M. Davis
    Andrew M. Davis
    Department of the Geophysical Sciences and Enrico Fermi Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, United States
  • Wataru Fujiya
    Wataru Fujiya
    Faculty of Science, Ibaraki University, Mito 310-8512, Japan
  • Ryota Fukai
    Ryota Fukai
    Institute of Space and Astronautical Science (ISAS), Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA), Sagamihara 252-5210, Japan
    More by Ryota Fukai
  • Ikshu Gautam
    Ikshu Gautam
    Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo 152-8551, Japan
    More by Ikshu Gautam
  • Makiko K. Haba
    Makiko K. Haba
    Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo 152-8551, Japan
  • Yuki Hibiya
    Yuki Hibiya
    Department of General Systems Studies, University of Tokyo, Tokyo 153-0041, Japan
    More by Yuki Hibiya
  • Hiroshi Hidaka
    Hiroshi Hidaka
    Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Nagoya University, Nagoya 464-8601, Japan
  • Peter Hoppe
    Peter Hoppe
    Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Mainz 55128, Germany
    More by Peter Hoppe
  • Gary R. Huss
    Gary R. Huss
    Hawai‘i Institute of Geophysics and Planetology, University of Hawai‘i at Ma̅noa, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822, United States
    More by Gary R. Huss
  • Tsuyoshi Iizuka
    Tsuyoshi Iizuka
    Department of Earth and Planetary Science, University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan
  • Trevor R. Ireland
    Trevor R. Ireland
    School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia
  • Akira Ishikawa
    Akira Ishikawa
    Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo 152-8551, Japan
  • Shoichi Itoh
    Shoichi Itoh
    Division of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan
    More by Shoichi Itoh
  • Noriyuki Kawasaki
    Noriyuki Kawasaki
    Department of Natural History Sciences, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 001-0021, Japan
  • Noriko T. Kita
    Noriko T. Kita
    Department of Geoscience, University of Wisconsin─Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, United States
  • Kouki Kitajima
    Kouki Kitajima
    Department of Geoscience, University of Wisconsin─Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, United States
  • Thorsten Kleine
    Thorsten Kleine
    Max Planck Institute for Solar System Research, Göttingen 37077, Germany
  • Sasha Krot
    Sasha Krot
    Hawai‘i Institute of Geophysics and Planetology, University of Hawai‘i at Ma̅noa, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822, United States
    More by Sasha Krot
  • Ming-Chang Liu
    Ming-Chang Liu
    Department of Earth, Planetary, and Space Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095, United States
  • Yuki Masuda
    Yuki Masuda
    Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo 152-8551, Japan
    More by Yuki Masuda
  • Frédéric Moynier
    Frédéric Moynier
    Université Paris Cité, Institut de physique du globe de Paris, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Paris 75005, France
  • Ann Nguyen
    Ann Nguyen
    Astromaterials Research and Exploration Science Division, National Aeronautics and Space Administration Johnson Space Center, Johnson Space Center, Houston, Texas 77058, United States
    More by Ann Nguyen
  • Larry Nittler
    Larry Nittler
    Earth and Planets Laboratory, Carnegie Institution for Science, Washington, District of Columbia 20015, United States
  • Andreas Pack
    Andreas Pack
    Faculty of Geosciences and Geography, University of Göttingen, Göttingen D-37077, Germany
    More by Andreas Pack
  • Changkun Park
    Changkun Park
    Division of Earth-System Sciences, Korea Polar Research Institute, Incheon 21990, Korea
  • Laurette Piani
    Laurette Piani
    Centre de Recherches Pétrographiques et Géochimiques, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique-Université de Lorraine, Nancy 54500, France
  • Liping Qin
    Liping Qin
    School of Earth and Space Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Anhui 230026, China
    More by Liping Qin
  • Tommaso Di Rocco
    Tommaso Di Rocco
    Faculty of Geosciences and Geography, University of Göttingen, Göttingen D-37077, Germany
  • Sara S. Russell
    Sara S. Russell
    Department of Earth Sciences, Natural History Museum, London SW7 5BD, U.K.
  • Naoya Sakamoto
    Naoya Sakamoto
    Isotope Imaging Laboratory, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 001-0021, Japan
  • Maria Schönbächler
    Maria Schönbächler
    Institute for Geochemistry and Petrology, Department of Earth Sciences, ETH Zurich, Zurich 8092, Switzerland
  • Lauren Tafla
    Lauren Tafla
    Department of Earth, Planetary, and Space Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095, United States
    More by Lauren Tafla
  • Haolan Tang
    Haolan Tang
    Department of Earth, Planetary, and Space Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095, United States
    More by Haolan Tang
  • Kentaro Terada
    Kentaro Terada
    Department of Earth and Space Science, Osaka University, Osaka 560-0043, Japan
  • Tomohiro Usui
    Tomohiro Usui
    Institute of Space and Astronautical Science (ISAS), Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA), Sagamihara 252-5210, Japan
  • Sohei Wada
    Sohei Wada
    Department of Natural History Sciences, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 001-0021, Japan
    More by Sohei Wada
  • Meenakshi Wadhwa
    Meenakshi Wadhwa
    School of Earth and Space Exploration, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85281, United States
  • Richard J. Walker
    Richard J. Walker
    Department of Geology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, United States
  • Katsuyuki Yamashita
    Katsuyuki Yamashita
    Graduate School of Natural Science and Technology, Okayama University, Okayama 700-8530, Japan
  • Qing-Zhu Yin
    Qing-Zhu Yin
    Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of California, Davis, California 95616, United States
    More by Qing-Zhu Yin
  • Shigekazu Yoneda
    Shigekazu Yoneda
    Department of Science and Engineering, National Museum of Nature and Science, Tsukuba 305-0005, Japan
  • Edward D. Young
    Edward D. Young
    Department of Earth, Planetary, and Space Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095, United States
  • Ai-Cheng Zhang
    Ai-Cheng Zhang
    School of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China
  • Tomoki Nakamura
    Tomoki Nakamura
    Department of Earth Science, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8578, Japan
  • Hiroshi Naraoka
    Hiroshi Naraoka
    Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 819-0395, Japan
  • Takaaki Noguchi
    Takaaki Noguchi
    Division of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan
  • Ryuji Okazaki
    Ryuji Okazaki
    Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 819-0395, Japan
  • Kanako Sakamoto
    Kanako Sakamoto
    Institute of Space and Astronautical Science (ISAS), Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA), Sagamihara 252-5210, Japan
  • Hikaru Yabuta
    Hikaru Yabuta
    Earth and Planetary Systems Science Program, Hiroshima University, Higashi-Hiroshima 739-8526, Japan
  • Masanao Abe
    Masanao Abe
    Institute of Space and Astronautical Science (ISAS), Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA), Sagamihara 252-5210, Japan
    More by Masanao Abe
  • Akiko Miyazaki
    Akiko Miyazaki
    Institute of Space and Astronautical Science (ISAS), Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA), Sagamihara 252-5210, Japan
  • Aiko Nakato
    Aiko Nakato
    Institute of Space and Astronautical Science (ISAS), Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA), Sagamihara 252-5210, Japan
    More by Aiko Nakato
  • Masahiro Nishimura
    Masahiro Nishimura
    Institute of Space and Astronautical Science (ISAS), Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA), Sagamihara 252-5210, Japan
  • Tatsuaki Okada
    Tatsuaki Okada
    Institute of Space and Astronautical Science (ISAS), Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA), Sagamihara 252-5210, Japan
  • Toru Yada
    Toru Yada
    Institute of Space and Astronautical Science (ISAS), Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA), Sagamihara 252-5210, Japan
    More by Toru Yada
  • Kasumi Yogata
    Kasumi Yogata
    Institute of Space and Astronautical Science (ISAS), Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA), Sagamihara 252-5210, Japan
  • Satoru Nakazawa
    Satoru Nakazawa
    Institute of Space and Astronautical Science (ISAS), Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA), Sagamihara 252-5210, Japan
  • Takanao Saiki
    Takanao Saiki
    Institute of Space and Astronautical Science (ISAS), Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA), Sagamihara 252-5210, Japan
  • Satoshi Tanaka
    Satoshi Tanaka
    Institute of Space and Astronautical Science (ISAS), Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA), Sagamihara 252-5210, Japan
  • Fuyuto Terui
    Fuyuto Terui
    Graduate School of Engineering, Kanagawa Institute of Technology, Atsugi 243-0292, Japan
    More by Fuyuto Terui
  • Yuichi Tsuda
    Yuichi Tsuda
    Institute of Space and Astronautical Science (ISAS), Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA), Sagamihara 252-5210, Japan
    More by Yuichi Tsuda
  • Sei-ichiro Watanabe
    Sei-ichiro Watanabe
    Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Nagoya University, Nagoya 464-8601, Japan
  • Makoto Yoshikawa
    Makoto Yoshikawa
    Institute of Space and Astronautical Science (ISAS), Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA), Sagamihara 252-5210, Japan
  • Shogo Tachibana
    Shogo Tachibana
    UTokyo Organization for Planetary and Space Science (UTOPS), University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan
  • Hisayoshi Yurimoto
    Hisayoshi Yurimoto
    Department of Natural History Sciences, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 001-0021, Japan
Open PDFSupporting Information (1)

Analytical Chemistry

Cite this: Anal. Chem. 2024, 96, 1, 170–178
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.3c03463
Published December 28, 2023

Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under

CC-BY 4.0 .

Abstract

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Characterization of the elemental distribution of samples with rough surfaces has been strongly desired for the analysis of various natural and artificial materials. Particularly for pristine and rare analytes with micrometer sizes embedded on specimen surfaces, non-invasive and matrix effect-free analysis is required without surface polishing treatment. To satisfy these requirements, we proposed a new method employing the sequential combination of two imaging modalities, i.e., microenergy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence (micro-XRF) and Raman micro-spectroscopy. The applicability of the developed method is tested by the quantitative analysis of cation composition in micrometer-sized carbonate grains on the surfaces of intact particles sampled directly from the asteroid Ryugu. The first step of micro-XRF imaging enabled a quick search for the sparsely scattered and micrometer-sized carbonates by the codistributions of Ca2+ and Mn2+ on the Mg2+- and Fe2+-rich phyllosilicate matrix. The following step of Raman micro-spectroscopy probed the carbonate grains and analyzed their cation composition (Ca2+, Mg2+, and Fe2+ + Mn2+) in a matrix effect-free manner via the systematic Raman shifts of the lattice modes. The carbonates were basically assigned to ferroan dolomite bearing a considerable amount of Fe2+ + Mn2+ at around 10 atom %. These results are in good accordance with the assignments reported by scanning electron microscopy–energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, where the thin-sectioned and surface-polished Ryugu particles were applicable. The proposed method requires neither sectioning nor surface polishing; hence, it can be applied to the remote sensing apparatus on spacecrafts and planetary rovers. Furthermore, the non-invasive and matrix effect-free characterization will provide a reliable analytical tool for quantitative analysis of the elemental distribution on the samples with surface roughness and chemical heterogeneity at a micrometer scale, such as art paintings, traditional crafts with decorated shapes, as well as sands and rocks with complex morphologies in nature.

This publication is licensed under

CC-BY 4.0 .
  • cc licence
  • by licence
Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society

Introduction

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The analysis of the elemental distribution is fundamental for characterizing natural and artificial materials. However, these materials often have surface roughness and a complicated structure. Examples are environmentally polluting substances with heavy metal elements, geo- and cosmo-chemical samples with microcrystals of minerals, artworks and sculptures with surface paintings, and fragments left on crime scenes.
For the quantitative analysis of the elemental composition of materials, there are several bulk analytical techniques that give precise values, such as inductively coupled plasma mass spectroscopy (ICP–MS). (1) However, heterogeneous characteristics such as surface roughness and chemical heterogeneity of the sample will be deprived by its dissolution procedures. The obtained elemental composition averages the entire volume sampled in the case of destructive analyses.
For the analysis of elemental distributions of the sample surfaces, scanning electron microscopy with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM–EDS), electron probe microanalyzer (EPMA), and secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) (1) are powerful analytical tools. Their imaging modalities enable us to measure such physically and chemically heterogeneous samples with excellent spatial resolution at a micrometer-to-nanometer scale. However, they generally require pretreatments such as sample sectioning, surface polishing, or metal/carbon coating to avoid charging due to the irradiation of electron or ion beams onto the sample surfaces. These pretreatments sometimes lose information about surface roughness or porosity and affect the accuracy of quantitative estimations of the spatially distributed elements. Accordingly, a non-invasive analytical method is strongly desired to evaluate the spatial distributions of elements with their surface morphology intact. Here, “non-invasive” is defined as a procedure not involving irreversible alternations by physical or chemical processes in the pretreatments, such as surface polishing or metal/carbon coating.
Microenergy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence (micro-XRF) allows us to visualize the heterogeneous spatial distribution of elements at the micrometer scale without any pretreatments. (2) Synchrotron radiation micro-XRF (SR-XRF) (3) is of particular advantage as a high-energy source with strong brightness and excellent spatial resolution at a submicron scale. Furthermore, X-ray absorption fine structure (XAFS) can be simultaneously obtained with SR-XRF, which enables us to reveal the chemical state of that sample. One notable disadvantage in SR-XRF is its quite limited access to synchrotron light sources. Alternatively, laboratory micro-XRF offers much easier access. However, the primary X-rays focused by a glass capillary result in a spatial resolution typically of 100 μm or, at best, 10 μm. When the size of the analytes of interest is on the micrometer scale, these spatial resolutions induce another drawback: the unwanted overlap of signals from the matrix surrounding the micrometer-sized analytes. Furthermore, compared to an electron or ion beam, an X-ray penetrates further inside the analyte. Therefore, when the analyte is thin, the detection area also expands into the depth direction of the matrix. Consequently, three-dimensional signal overlap reduces the accuracy of the quantitative estimation of elements in the aimed analyte. In the present paper, these problems, originating from both the instrumental limitations of micro-XRF and sample size and morphology, are all referred to as “matrix effects”.
Another candidate is Raman micro-spectroscopy. It is also a non-invasive analytical technique that provides information on slight changes in molecular or crystal structures with superior lateral spatial resolution (normally 1 μm) to that of micro-XRF. Furthermore, since the spectral patterns of Raman scattering originate from molecular or crystal structures, we can discriminatively measure these analytes in the focused area. In other words, we can distinguish Raman signals of the targeted molecules and crystals selectively from those of the matrix. However, Raman micro-spectroscopy also has disadvantages in measurement time due to its inherently weak signal. Thus, the imaging area is quite limited by trading off its spatial resolution. This disadvantage could be serious when the analyte is rare and is heterogeneously and sparsely scattered on the surface of the specimen on a millimeter or even larger scale.
To overcome these difficulties, we propose a new analytical method of micro-XRF and Raman micro-spectroscopy. To examine the capability of the proposed method, we studied the samples directly collected from the asteroid Ryugu by the Hayabusa2 spacecraft (4,5) as a practical example of an extremely rare, heterogeneous, and complex sample with rugged surfaces. They have various micrometer-scaled grains of minerals sparsely existing on the surface of the phyllosilicate matrix. (6)
Among the various minerals found on the Ryugu samples, we focused on carbonates. This is because they are important secondary minerals formed by aqueous alteration and are expected to provide quite fruitful information on the aqueous environments where they were formed in the early solar system. (7,8) In terrestrial environments, they are commonly found in sedimentary rocks. Their chemical characteristics and cation compositions help us understand the chemical histories of the atmosphere, oceans, and climate change that they experienced. (9) Furthermore, interestingly, the kinds of carbonate have many variations depending on cation compositions, e.g., calcite, magnesite, dolomite, and siderite. (9) Some trace or minor elements that preferentially occur in carbonate grains are manganese, bromine, strontium, and yttrium. (9) Among these elements, the magnesium ion in dolomite can be easily substituted by manganese or iron. In particular, previous studies reported that this substitution frequently occurred on the dolomites of the most primitive meteorites that were formed during the early stages of the solar system. (10−12)
In recent studies, we have developed scales to quantitatively evaluate the degree of cation substitution of carbonates that occurred on natural dolomites using peak shifts of Raman frequencies. (13−15) Since natural dolomite forms dolomite [CaMg(CO3)2]–ankerite [CaFe(CO3)2]3 solid solution systems, (16,17) the quantitative estimation of Fe2+(+Mn2+) is important to investigate the chemical environment where they occurred. The present study demonstrates that micro-XRF imaging realizes the efficient search of dolomite crystals on the Ryugu particles, and that the following Raman imaging at the region of interest (ROI) area can estimate the cation composition quantitatively without matrix effects. The proposed method is sufficiently pragmatic to quantitatively estimate the cation compositions of Ryugu dolomites in a matrix effect-free and non-invasive manner.

Experimental Section

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Elemental Imaging by Micro-XRF

Micro-XRF was performed at HORIBA X-ray LAB with version 1.3.2.19 software (XGT-9000, HORIBA Co., Ltd.). An arrayed multichamber cell (AMCC; see the following section for the details) was loaded into the measurement position under vacuum conditions. The primary X-rays were focused to 100 μm in diameter with a glass polycapillary optic and vertically irradiated the sample. The fluorescence X-rays from the samples were measured by a silicon drift EDS detector at an angle of 45°. An Rh target X-ray tube was used to generate the primary X-rays. A specimen stage in the XGT-9000 scanned the sample position, while obtaining a spectrum step by step. While the scanning step was slightly varied depending on the desired imaging area, it was typically 14 μm and, at its largest, 20 μm. A step size smaller than the beam size (i.e., spatial resolution) was chosen for definitely finding the Ca-rich spots. Namely, the XRF beam was not spatially homogeneous, and hence, the center of the spot tends to be preferentially probed. Conversely, if the step size was comparable to the beam size, small Ca-rich spots located just between the focused spots might accidentally fail to be found because of the low X-ray photon density at the edge of the beam. The step size being sufficiently smaller than the beam size helps dispel such concerns. By processing the spectrum and calculating the X-ray intensity of an element, the distribution of the element was visualized; this process is called elemental imaging or micro-XRF imaging in the present paper. The measurement conditions of the X-ray tube voltage, the measurement time, and X-ray working distance were 30 kV, 200 ms per pixel, and 1.0 mm, respectively. The tube current was set to 300 μA.

Raman Micro-spectroscopy

Micro-Raman measurements were performed with LabRAM HR Evolution and LabSpec 6 software (HORIBA Co., Ltd.). For the detector, a Synapse EMCCD camera (HORIBA Co., Ltd.) was equipped. The confocal optical arrangement of the microscope and autofocusing stage-driving with the software enabled us to obtain Raman mapping data with high spatial resolution even from the samples with surface roughness and without any pretreatment, such as surface polishing. Olympus LMPlanFN (100x, NA 0.80, WD 3.4 mm) was used as an objective lens for high-resolution Raman mapping with (sub)micrometer resolution. The spatial resolution (focus size of the laser) would be 0.4 μm at best under an assumption that the beam size of the incident light perfectly matched the pupil diameter of the objective lens. While it is difficult to prove that the size matching is perfect, the spot size (i.e., the spatial resolution) should not far exceed 1 μm. The excitation wavelength and power were 532 nm and 0.6–1.2 mW, respectively. The spectra were measured with 120 s exposure and averaged 2 times. The Raman signal from a Si wafer (520.6 cm–1) and a sulfur flake (153.8, 219.1, and 473.2 cm–1) was used for calibrating the Raman wavenumber.

Estimating Cation Composition and Construction of the Ternary Diagram

To determine the cation compositions for terrestrial carbonates, the standard fundamental parameter (FP) method (18,19) was applied to the XRF spectra. The cation compositions were calibrated by standard samples named JLk-1 and Dolomite (MV) for kutnohorite (14) and dolomite, respectively. The standard FP method can calibrate fundamental parameters, including coefficients for elemental intensity, stored in the instrumentation, which are subject to matrix effects. JLk-1 is lake sediment from Lake Biwa, Shiga, Japan, which is a geostandard sample provided by the National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Japan. Dolomite (MV) is a dolomite stone mined in Morro Velho, Brazil. A single crystal (0.1697 g) of Dolomite (MV) was used as the standard, and its cation composition was determined by inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES). The details of the ICP-AES experiment can be found in the Supporting Information (SI). Each cation content was finally given by the simple eq 1 below.
Cion=WionMionWMgMMg+WCaMCa+WMnMMn+WFeMFe(ion=Mg,Ca,Mn,orFe)
(1)
Cion: cation content [atom %], Wion: elemental concentration [wt %], and Mion: atomic weight.

Arrayed Multi-chamber Cell

To implement two measurements of micro-XRF and Raman micro-spectroscopy sequentially, we have developed a sample holder called AMCC (Figure S1 in the Supporting Information). Specifically, we drilled holes 0.5 mm deep with diameters ranging from 0.5 to 1.2 mm at 0.1 mm pitch (Figure S1a–c). When loading the sample(s), we carefully chose a hole that would fit the size of the Ryugu particles. This is because the Ryugu particles might be lost in the instrument chambers due to air flowing upon vacuuming or due to static electricity. When the AMCC was placed on the specimen stage of the respective microscope, AMCC jigs were used (Figure S1d,f). During the micro-XRF measurement, the pressure in the sample chamber was simultaneously monitored to keep it below tens of Pa. When transferring the AMCC from micro-XRF to a Raman microscope, the pressure in the sample chamber was gradually released to atmospheric pressure, and the AMCC was carefully detached from the stage to reduce the risk of sample loss. When the sample amount is as small as or less than 1 mg, the holes may be unfit due to static electricity. Therefore, a 0.5 mm thick aluminum cell frame was set to load a single Ryugu particle into a hole with an appropriate diameter. As for measuring the reference minerals, they were fixed by acrylic cell frames. Note that the reference minerals were large enough not to worry about the risk of sample loss.

Samples

A Ryugu particle picked up from the A0107 aggregate sample collected at the first touchdown site (TD1) was measured in this study. (5)
The mined locations of the geostandard and terrestrial carbonates are summarized as follows. JLk-1 is from Lake Biwa, Shiga, Japan. Calcite is from Garo, Hokkaido, Japan. Magnesite is from Goat Hill Magnesia Quarries, Pennsylvenia, USA. Kutnohorite (SH) is from Sterling Mine, New Jersey, USA. Kutnohorite (W) is from Wissels Mine, Northern Cape, South Africa. Dolomite (MV) is from Morro Velho Mine, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Ferroan dolomite (EM) is from Eagle Mine, Colorado, USA. Their optical images are shown in Figure S2 in the Supporting Information.

Results and Discussion

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Mn–Ca Colocalization on the Ryugu Particle

Figure 1 shows the elemental imaging of the Ryugu particle (from A0107) with micro-XRF. As shown in Figure 1, Mg and Fe were predominantly present. In contrast, the distribution of Ca was sparse and heterogeneous. Mn also showed a spatial distribution similar to that of Ca; the bright spots of Mn overlapped well with those of Ca. Based on previous studies, (10−12) this spatial matching of Ca and Mn strongly suggests that these spots correspond to the positions where carbonate grains exist. The other two major cations in carbonates, i.e., Mg and Fe, are also abundantly included in the matrix of phyllosilicate minerals. Therefore, elemental images of Ca and Mn help us find the locations of carbonate grains on the matrix. However, since the carbonates are identified with Ca, Mg, and Fe + Mn, it is hard to identify carbonate species based only on Ca and Mn distribution.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Optical image of the Ryugu particle in AMCC (left, scale bars: 0.5 mm) and the corresponding elemental images for Ca, Mn, Fe, and Mg (four panels in right, scale bars: 0.5 mm).

In Figure 1, it should be noted that not only the bright spots of Ca and Mn match spatially well but also the brightness of each element varies depending on the locations. This result implies that there are a variety of cation compositions in each carbonate grain at the Ca–Mn colocalization sites. However, we must remark that the brightness variation might simply derive from the matrix effects, which indicates the difficulty in estimating cation compositions merely through micro-XRF.

Raman Spectra Measured at Ca–Mn-Rich Spots

To confirm whether carbonate grains actually exist at the Ca–Mn colocalization spots, we then measured Raman spectra at the Ca–Mn rich spots appearing in the top panel of Figure 2. Note that probing the identical spots for micro-XRF and Raman microscopes was achieved through the use of the identical AMCC mentioned above. It is also noteworthy that from optical microscopic images, i.e., without the help of the elemental map observed by XRF, carbonate grains on Ryugu as well as on other meteorites are generally indistinguishable from those of other minerals such as silicates and iron oxides. As shown in Figure 2, three or four sharp peaks with a broad fluorescence background appeared in the Raman spectra at all measured colocalization spots. The peak wavenumbers for these bands were around 174, 295, 724, and 1094 cm–1, as summarized in Table 1. (Note that, strictly speaking, the “wavenumber” should be referred to as the relative wavenumber to that of incident light or conventionally “Raman shift”. In the present paper, however, we use “wavenumber” because the words “relative” and “shift” have started to be avoided in recent years, presumably as they make an impression that the wavenumber can change due to some perturbations such as temperature and pressure changes.) These bands are characteristic to carbonates, and each peak is assignable to translational lattice mode (T), librational lattice mode (L), CO32– bending mode (ν4), and CO32– stretching mode (ν1), respectively. (20,21) The appearance of the set of these peaks ensures that there are indeed carbonate grains at all of the Ca–Mn colocalization spots. Furthermore, the peak wavenumbers are known to shift, depending on the cation compositions in the carbonates. By comparing the peak wavenumbers with those observed in previous studies, (13−15) we assigned these carbonates essentially to dolomite CaMg(CO3)2. Note that Mg in dolomite is often partially substituted by Fe or Mn, forming dolomite [CaMg(CO3)2]–ankerite [CaFe(CO3)2]–kutnohorite [CaMn(CO3)2] solid solution series. (16,17) In fact, the peak wavenumbers summarized in Table 1 slightly deviated from each other, implying different degrees of cation substitution occurring at each carbonate grain. The slightly lower wavenumbers of the ν1 mode compared to that of terrestrial dolomite would be also due to the substitution. The cation substitution will be quantitatively discussed in detail in the following section.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Ca bright spots on the surface of the Ryugu particle by micro-XRF imaging and their corresponding Raman spectra by a Raman microscope. The inset in each spectrum is the corresponding optical image (scale bars: 20 μm). Grayish grains on black matrices are carbonates.

Table 1. Raman Frequencies for Ryugu Carbonate Grains and Terrestrial References (unit: cm–1)
 TLν4ν1
A(a)176.4298.9724.91096.8
A(b)173.7296.0721.71094.8
A(c)171.6289.7722.31095.0
B173.8295.0 1095.3
C175.0296.1 1095.6
D175.1296.3 1095.0
E175.0294.6 1094.6
F174.5296.1 1094.7
calcite154.6 ± 0.9280.9 ± 0.9711.6 ± 0.81086.0 ± 0.8
magnesite212.5 ± 1.0329.3 ± 1.0738.2 ± 1.11094.4 ± 1.0
Dolomite (MV)174.1 ± 0.2296.7 ± 0.2724.3 ± 0.11096.8 ± 0.2

Estimation of Fe + Mn Content in Ryugu Dolomites

The partial substitution of Mg for Fe or Mn was suggested by both micro-XRF and Raman microspectroscopy. However, since Mg and Fe exist everywhere in the matrix, it is difficult to selectively quantify the amount of these cations in carbonates solely with micro-XRF. On the other hand, in our previous studies, it was found that the cation composition of carbonates can be uniquely determined from their Raman wavenumbers of T- and L-modes within an error of 1.7%. (14,15) While a couple of conversion equations were proposed in the previous studies, (13−15,22−27) it is essential to first qualitatively identify the type of carbonates (i.e., major cations contained) in order to choose the most suitable equation.
For this purpose, the T- and L-mode frequencies of Ryugu carbonates are biaxially plotted together with those of terrestrial carbonates belonging to the dolomite-ankerite-kutnohorite solid solution series (Figure 3). In Figure 3, two kurnohorites labeled (SH) and (W), which were collected at Sterling Hills (USA) and Wissels Mine (South Africa), respectively, are shown because their cation compositions were noticeably different (XRF spectra can be found in Figure S3 in the Supporting Information). A wide distribution of the T- and L-mode wavenumbers found for terrestrial ferroan dolomite [Eagle Mine (EM), USA; data taken from ref (13)] is due to heterogeneity of cation composition in a sample. The cation compositions of the terrestrial carbonates are summarized in Table S1 in the Supporting Information. By comparison of the results for terrestrial and Ryugu carbonates, Ryugu carbonates are assignable to ferroan dolomite, while their wavenumbers also slightly depend on the measurement position, reflecting their heterogeneity.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Biaxial plotting and comparison for Ryugu dolomites and terrestrial references with T- and L-mode wavenumbers. For Ryugu dolomites, the black filled markers represent those obtained at grains A(a)-F, while the open markers represent those obtained at several different spots within grain B. Dol stands for dolomite, and FD stands for ferroan dolomite.

As already reported in our previous studies, (13,14) the cation compositions of ferroan dolomites can be obtained by the T- and L-mode wavenumbers. For CFe+Mn, it is
CFe+Mn=0.02273νL~+6.836
(2)
where νL~ is the L-mode wavenumber in inverse centimeters. (13) For CCa, although we had reported a similar equation (CCa=0.03155νT~+0.02768νL~2.13220), (14) here it is revised as
CCa=0.03139νT~+0.01867νL~+0.419
(3)
where νT~ is the T-mode wavenumber in inverse centimeters. The reason for this revision is that the Ca content in a standard sample was overestimated in the previous study. (14) The coefficients of eq 3 were derived in the same way as those in the previous study, but a more reliable standard was used here by changing the reference dolomite from JDo-1 (dolostone) to a dolomite crystal (Morro Velho Mine, Brazil). The details of the derivation of eq 3 and the reason for the modification can be found in SI with a Raman spectrum of JDo-1 (Figure S4). We should remark that this revision decreases the calculated Ca content by about 8 ± 2 atom % from those calculated by the original one. Note that the reason for the overestimation of Ca content in the previous equation is that JDo-1 contains a noticeable amount of calcite, even though it is provided as a “dolomite rock”. Namely, while CCa was provided as 0.57 by the public organization AIST, some of the Ca originates from calcite, not dolomite. Although it is quite difficult to obtain CCa of the dolomite portion in JDo-1 because it is a powder mixture of dolomite and calcite, by assuming it is 0.50 such as in the ideal case of dolomite CaMg(CO3)2, the previous equation should overestimate CCa about 0.07 (7 atom %). The coincidence between this rough estimation (7 atom %) and the experimental results (8 ± 2 atom %) supports that the revised equation is more reliable. By determining CCa and CFe+Mn, CMg can be derived from eq 1, namely, CCa + CMg + CFe+Mn = 1. One may concern oneself with the reliability and the significant digits in eqs 2 and 3. Our previous study demonstrated that the error of the equations is 0.04 (4 atom %) at worst. Therefore, the last digits of the composition obtained by the equations should be on the order of 0.01. Because the rounding should be taken after the summation, the significant digits of the coefficients were determined for the last digits of each term of the right hand in eqs to be 0.001. Note that the accuracy of the peak wavenumber in the present study was typically around 0.2 cm–1, and it gives rise to a composition error of less than 1 atom % according to the error propagation theory. Therefore, the composition error due to the Raman measurement would be negligible as long as the Raman spectra are properly measured.
The cation compositions of Ryugu dolomites derived by eqs 13 are plotted in the ternary diagram (Figure 4a). The results indicate that the majority of Ryugu dolomites contain about 10–15% Fe or Mn. In a recent study, a ternary diagram (Ca, Mg, and Fe + Mn) of Ryugu dolomites reported with SEM–EDX measurements showed on average 10–20% for CFe+Mn. (28,29)

Figure 4

Figure 4. Cation composition for Ryugu dolomites. (a) Cation compositions of Ryugu dolomites plotted on a ternary diagram. The filled and open markers represent those obtained at the spot A(a) to F and those within the spot B, respectively. (b) Raman spectra measured at the spots showing typical and irregular compositions. “Typical” spectrum is of the spot A(a) while “Irregular” is of the spot A(c).

The distribution is in good accordance with that in the present study. This consistency ensures the reliability of the proposed analytical method. Furthermore, the present method does not require pretreatments of samples, such as surface polishing. It is worth highlighting that the quantitative estimation was achieved in the totally non-invasive manner without matrix effects.
For the grain whose Fe + Mn composition is about 25% (the one labeled “Irregular” in Figure 4a), it should be noted that the Raman peaks obtained at the spot [A(c)] were significantly broader than those typically obtained. The reason for the band broadening is unclear, but a plausible explanation is the low crystallinity of the dolomite grain at this spot. Because it is difficult to determine the peak position for the broad bands, it cannot be concluded currently whether the irregularly high concentration (∼25%) of Fe and Mn was true or just an artifact due to the broadened Raman band. It is worth keeping in mind that an adequate quality of the spectra (i.e., enough peak intensity and the sharpness of the peak without irregular broadening) is necessary for the estimation of accurate composition. This point is essential, especially when this technique is automatically applied to Raman mapping data. While the automatic analysis may provide a peak wavenumber even if the spectral quality is not sufficient, its reliability should be carefully checked by the signal-to-noise ratio, signal-to-background ratio, and sharpness of the bands. It is also unsatisfactory that Fe and Mn are indistinguishable due to their similarity in ionic radii and masses. (13,14) However, it is worth noting that such quantitative analysis is achieved not by signal intensity but by the Raman shifts of the signals. As Raman shifts are influenced by neither the matrix effect nor the total amount of the sample, the composition can be accurately estimated.
As mentioned above, carbonate grains are crucial as evidence of experienced aqueous alteration, and the heterogeneity of cation abundance should provide important information to infer the aqueous environment. In the present paper, the elemental imaging of micro-XRF enhances efficient searching of sparsely distributed carbonates without pretreatments such as surface polishing and metal/carbon coating. Thanks to the sample selectivity and characteristic shifts of Raman microspectroscopy, it is also advantageous to quantitatively estimate the heterogeneity of cation composition in the same carbonate grain simultaneously. Raman spectra at a few spots within spot B were measured (Figure S5 in the Supporting Information) and analyzed, and it turned out that the cation compositions were heterogeneous even inside a single dolomite grain, as shown in Figures 3 and 4a. The proposed method, based on the sequential combination of XRF and Raman microscopes, would provide an initial analysis tool for evaluating the microheterogeneity of rare and pristine samples with surface roughness without any pretreatments.

Summary

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The sequential analysis of micro-XRF and Raman spectroscopy on the surfaces of Ryugu intact particles at the same measurement positions revealed that the Ca–Mn colocalized spots were found to be carbonate grains, and most of them can be assigned to ferroan dolomites, where the Fe–Mn ratio was estimated to be around 10–15%. These results indicate that the Ryugu dolomites have features similar to those found on CI-class meteorites, where Fe and Mn are considerably included. From an analytical point of view, we demonstrated that the sequential analysis of micro-XRF and Raman spectroscopy greatly enhanced finding and quantitatively characterizing important minerals that sparsely existed at the micrometer scale on the sample surfaces. The non-invasive manner of these two spectroscopies does not require pretreatments such as surface polishing before measurements. These points are favorable for the initial analysis of such extremely rare samples before performing further precise but invasive or destructive analyses to grasp the general features of the analytes and enhance the reliability of quantitative data estimated by other conventional methods. Moreover, a noteworthy advantage of the proposed method is that it provides a versatile tool to demonstrate the microregion heterogeneity of composition, while avoiding any matrix effects due to sample characteristics which are sometimes problematic in analyses utilizing X-rays. The proposed analytical approach is also applicable to a variety of samples of artwork and geo- or cosmo-chemical specimens.

Supporting Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.analchem.3c03463.

  • Experimental details of ICP-AES and micro XRF, derivation of eq 3, cation compositions for terrestrial carbonates, detailed pictures of AMCC itself and samples loaded on AMCC, XRF spectra of the terrestrial samples, and Raman spectrum of JDo-1 (PDF)

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

  • Corresponding Author
  • Authors
    • Mayu Morita - Analytical Technology Division, Horiba Techno Service Co., Ltd., Kyoto 601-8125, JapanOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5769-7687
    • Shu-hei Urashima - Department of Chemistry, Tokyo University of Science, Tokyo 162-8601, JapanOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8772-4287
    • Morihiko Onose - Analytical Technology Division, Horiba Techno Service Co., Ltd., Kyoto 601-8125, Japan
    • Shintaro Komatani - Analytical Technology Division, Horiba Techno Service Co., Ltd., Kyoto 601-8125, Japan
    • Izumi Nakai - Department of Applied Chemistry, Tokyo University of Science, Tokyo 162-8601, Japan
    • Yoshinari Abe - Graduate School of Engineering Materials Science and Engineering, Tokyo Denki University, Tokyo 120-8551, Japan
    • Yasuko Terada - Spectroscopy and Imaging Division, Japan Synchrotron Radiation Research Institute, Hyogo 679-5198, Japan
    • Hisashi Homma - Osaka Application Laboratory, Rigaku Corporation, Osaka 569-1146, JapanOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-3662-577X
    • Kazuko Motomura - Thermal Analysis Division, Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo 196-8666, Japan
    • Kiyohiro Ichida - Analytical Technology Division, Horiba Techno Service Co., Ltd., Kyoto 601-8125, Japan
    • Tetsuya Yokoyama - Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo 152-8551, Japan
    • Kazuhide Nagashima - Hawai‘i Institute of Geophysics and Planetology, University of Hawai‘i at Ma̅noa, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822, United States
    • Jérôme Aléon - Institut de Minéralogie, de Physique des Matériaux et de Cosmochimie, Sorbonne Université, Museum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique Unité Mixte de Recherche 7590, Institut de recherche pour le développement, Paris 75005, France
    • Conel M. O’D. Alexander - Earth and Planets Laboratory, Carnegie Institution for Science, Washington, District of Columbia 20015, United States
    • Sachiko Amari - McDonnell Center for the Space Sciences and Physics Department, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri 63130, United StatesGeochemical Research Center, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan
    • Yuri Amelin - Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, GD 510640, China
    • Ken-ichi Bajo - Department of Natural History Sciences, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 001-0021, Japan
    • Martin Bizzarro - Centre for Star and Planet Formation, Globe Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen K 1350, Denmark
    • Audrey Bouvier - Bayerisches Geoinstitut, Universität Bayreuth, Bayreuth 95447, Germany
    • Richard W. Carlson - Earth and Planets Laboratory, Carnegie Institution for Science, Washington, District of Columbia 20015, United States
    • Marc Chaussidon - Université Paris Cité, Institut de physique du globe de Paris, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Paris 75005, France
    • Byeon-Gak Choi - Department of Earth Science Education, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Republic of KoreaOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-1899-2864
    • Nicolas Dauphas - Department of the Geophysical Sciences and Enrico Fermi Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, United StatesOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-1330-2038
    • Andrew M. Davis - Department of the Geophysical Sciences and Enrico Fermi Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, United States
    • Wataru Fujiya - Faculty of Science, Ibaraki University, Mito 310-8512, JapanOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2578-5521
    • Ryota Fukai - Institute of Space and Astronautical Science (ISAS), Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA), Sagamihara 252-5210, JapanOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-1477-829X
    • Ikshu Gautam - Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo 152-8551, Japan
    • Makiko K. Haba - Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo 152-8551, Japan
    • Yuki Hibiya - Department of General Systems Studies, University of Tokyo, Tokyo 153-0041, Japan
    • Hiroshi Hidaka - Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Nagoya University, Nagoya 464-8601, Japan
    • Peter Hoppe - Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Mainz 55128, GermanyOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3681-050X
    • Gary R. Huss - Hawai‘i Institute of Geophysics and Planetology, University of Hawai‘i at Ma̅noa, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822, United States
    • Tsuyoshi Iizuka - Department of Earth and Planetary Science, University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan
    • Trevor R. Ireland - School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia
    • Akira Ishikawa - Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo 152-8551, Japan
    • Shoichi Itoh - Division of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan
    • Noriyuki Kawasaki - Department of Natural History Sciences, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 001-0021, Japan
    • Noriko T. Kita - Department of Geoscience, University of Wisconsin─Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, United States
    • Kouki Kitajima - Department of Geoscience, University of Wisconsin─Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, United States
    • Thorsten Kleine - Max Planck Institute for Solar System Research, Göttingen 37077, Germany
    • Sasha Krot - Hawai‘i Institute of Geophysics and Planetology, University of Hawai‘i at Ma̅noa, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822, United States
    • Ming-Chang Liu - Department of Earth, Planetary, and Space Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095, United States
    • Yuki Masuda - Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo 152-8551, Japan
    • Frédéric Moynier - Université Paris Cité, Institut de physique du globe de Paris, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Paris 75005, France
    • Ann Nguyen - Astromaterials Research and Exploration Science Division, National Aeronautics and Space Administration Johnson Space Center, Johnson Space Center, Houston, Texas 77058, United States
    • Larry Nittler - Earth and Planets Laboratory, Carnegie Institution for Science, Washington, District of Columbia 20015, United States
    • Andreas Pack - Faculty of Geosciences and Geography, University of Göttingen, Göttingen D-37077, Germany
    • Changkun Park - Division of Earth-System Sciences, Korea Polar Research Institute, Incheon 21990, Korea
    • Laurette Piani - Centre de Recherches Pétrographiques et Géochimiques, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique-Université de Lorraine, Nancy 54500, France
    • Liping Qin - School of Earth and Space Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Anhui 230026, China
    • Tommaso Di Rocco - Faculty of Geosciences and Geography, University of Göttingen, Göttingen D-37077, Germany
    • Sara S. Russell - Department of Earth Sciences, Natural History Museum, London SW7 5BD, U.K.
    • Naoya Sakamoto - Isotope Imaging Laboratory, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 001-0021, Japan
    • Maria Schönbächler - Institute for Geochemistry and Petrology, Department of Earth Sciences, ETH Zurich, Zurich 8092, Switzerland
    • Lauren Tafla - Department of Earth, Planetary, and Space Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095, United States
    • Haolan Tang - Department of Earth, Planetary, and Space Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095, United States
    • Kentaro Terada - Department of Earth and Space Science, Osaka University, Osaka 560-0043, Japan
    • Tomohiro Usui - Institute of Space and Astronautical Science (ISAS), Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA), Sagamihara 252-5210, Japan
    • Sohei Wada - Department of Natural History Sciences, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 001-0021, JapanOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6723-0378
    • Meenakshi Wadhwa - School of Earth and Space Exploration, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85281, United States
    • Richard J. Walker - Department of Geology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, United States
    • Katsuyuki Yamashita - Graduate School of Natural Science and Technology, Okayama University, Okayama 700-8530, Japan
    • Qing-Zhu Yin - Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of California, Davis, California 95616, United States
    • Shigekazu Yoneda - Department of Science and Engineering, National Museum of Nature and Science, Tsukuba 305-0005, Japan
    • Edward D. Young - Department of Earth, Planetary, and Space Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095, United States
    • Ai-Cheng Zhang - School of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China
    • Tomoki Nakamura - Department of Earth Science, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8578, Japan
    • Hiroshi Naraoka - Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 819-0395, Japan
    • Takaaki Noguchi - Division of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8502, JapanOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-7211-2595
    • Ryuji Okazaki - Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 819-0395, Japan
    • Kanako Sakamoto - Institute of Space and Astronautical Science (ISAS), Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA), Sagamihara 252-5210, Japan
    • Hikaru Yabuta - Earth and Planetary Systems Science Program, Hiroshima University, Higashi-Hiroshima 739-8526, Japan
    • Masanao Abe - Institute of Space and Astronautical Science (ISAS), Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA), Sagamihara 252-5210, Japan
    • Akiko Miyazaki - Institute of Space and Astronautical Science (ISAS), Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA), Sagamihara 252-5210, Japan
    • Aiko Nakato - Institute of Space and Astronautical Science (ISAS), Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA), Sagamihara 252-5210, Japan
    • Masahiro Nishimura - Institute of Space and Astronautical Science (ISAS), Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA), Sagamihara 252-5210, Japan
    • Tatsuaki Okada - Institute of Space and Astronautical Science (ISAS), Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA), Sagamihara 252-5210, Japan
    • Toru Yada - Institute of Space and Astronautical Science (ISAS), Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA), Sagamihara 252-5210, Japan
    • Kasumi Yogata - Institute of Space and Astronautical Science (ISAS), Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA), Sagamihara 252-5210, Japan
    • Satoru Nakazawa - Institute of Space and Astronautical Science (ISAS), Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA), Sagamihara 252-5210, Japan
    • Takanao Saiki - Institute of Space and Astronautical Science (ISAS), Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA), Sagamihara 252-5210, Japan
    • Satoshi Tanaka - Institute of Space and Astronautical Science (ISAS), Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA), Sagamihara 252-5210, Japan
    • Fuyuto Terui - Graduate School of Engineering, Kanagawa Institute of Technology, Atsugi 243-0292, Japan
    • Yuichi Tsuda - Institute of Space and Astronautical Science (ISAS), Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA), Sagamihara 252-5210, Japan
    • Sei-ichiro Watanabe - Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Nagoya University, Nagoya 464-8601, Japan
    • Makoto Yoshikawa - Institute of Space and Astronautical Science (ISAS), Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA), Sagamihara 252-5210, Japan
    • Shogo Tachibana - UTokyo Organization for Planetary and Space Science (UTOPS), University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan
    • Hisayoshi Yurimoto - Department of Natural History Sciences, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 001-0021, Japan
  • Author Contributions

    All authors have given approval to the final version of the manuscript.

  • Notes
    The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgments

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

We would like to deeply express gratitude to all the scientists and engineers of the JAXA Hayabusa 2 project, whose dedication and skills brought these precious particles back to the Earth. This research was supported by Grants-in-Aid by Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (KAKENHI JP20H02773), Japan.

References

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article references 29 other publications.

  1. 1
    Aramendia, J.; Gomez-Nubla, L.; Castro, K.; Fdez-Ortiz de Vallejuelo, S.; Arana, G.; Maguregui, M.; Baonza, V.; Medina, J.; Rull, F.; Madariaga, J. Overview of the techniques used for the study of non-terrestrial bodies: Proposition of novel non-destructive methodology. TrAC, Trends Anal. Chem. 2018, 98, 3646,  DOI: 10.1016/j.trac.2017.10.018
  2. 2
    Tsuji, K.; Matsuno, T.; Takimoto, Y.; Yamanashi, M.; Kometani, N.; Sasaki, Y. C.; Hasegawa, T.; Kato, S.; Yamada, T.; Shoji, T.; Kawahara, N. New developments of X-ray fluorescence imaging techniques in laboratory. Spectrochim. Acta, Part B 2015, 113, 4353,  DOI: 10.1016/j.sab.2015.09.001
  3. 3
    Smith, J. V. Tutorial review. Synchrotron X-ray sources: instrumental characteristics. New applications in microanalysis, tomography, absorption spectroscopy and diffraction. Analyst 1995, 120, 12311245,  DOI: 10.1039/an9952001231
  4. 4
    Wada, K.; Grott, M.; Michel, P.; Walsh, K. J.; Barucci, A. M.; Biele, J.; Blum, J.; Ernst, C. M.; Grundmann, J. T.; Gundlach, B.; Hagermann, A.; Hamm, M.; Jutzi, M.; Kim, M. J.; Kührt, E.; Le Corre, L.; Libourel, G.; Lichtenheldt, R.; Maturilli, A.; Messenger, S. R.; Michikami, T.; Miyamoto, H.; Mottola, S.; Müller, T.; Nakamura, A. M.; Nittler, L. R.; Ogawa, K.; Okada, T.; Palomba, E.; Sakatani, N.; Schröder, S. E.; Senshu, H.; Takir, D.; Zolensky, M. E. and International Regolith Science Group (IRSG) in Hayabusa2 project. Asteroid Ryugu before the Hayabusa2 encounter. Prog. Earth Planet. Sci. 2018, 5, 82,  DOI: 10.1186/s40645-018-0237-y
  5. 5
    Yada, T.; Abe, M.; Okada, T.; Nakato, A.; Yogata, K.; Miyazaki, A.; Hatakeda, K.; Kumagai, K.; Nishimura, M.; Hitomi, Y. Preliminary analysis of the Hayabusa2 samples returned from C-type asteroid Ryugu. Nat. Astron. 2021, 6, 214220,  DOI: 10.1038/s41550-021-01550-6
  6. 6
    Yokoyama, T.; Nagashima, K.; Nakai, I.; Young, E. D.; Abe, Y.; Aléon, J.; Alexander, C. M. O.; Amari, S.; Amelin, Y.; Bajo, K. i. Samples returned from the asteroid Ryugu are similar to Ivuna-type carbonaceous meteorites. Science 2023, 379, eabn7850  DOI: 10.1126/science.abn7850
  7. 7
    Brearley, A. J. Meteorites and the Early Solar System II; University of Arizona Press; Lauretta, D. S., McSween, H. Y., Eds., 2006; p 584.
  8. 8
    Fujiya, W.; Kawasaki, N.; Nagashima, K.; Sakamoto, N.; O’D. Alexander, C. M.; Kita, N. T.; Kitajima, K.; Abe, Y.; Aléon, J.; Amari, S. Carbonate record of temporal change in oxygen fugacity and gaseous species in asteroid Ryugu. Nat. Geosci. 2023, 16, 675682,  DOI: 10.1038/s41561-023-01226-y
  9. 9
    Morse, J. W.; Mackenzie, F. T. Geochemistry of Sedimentary Carbonates, 1st ed.; Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.: AE Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2003.
  10. 10
    Endreß, M.; Bischoff, A. Carbonates in CI chondrites: clues to parent body evolution. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1996, 60, 489507,  DOI: 10.1016/0016-7037(95)00399-1
  11. 11
    Johnson, C. A.; Prinz, M. Carbonate compositions in CM and CI chondrites and implications for aqueous alteration. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1993, 57, 28432852,  DOI: 10.1016/0016-7037(93)90393-B
  12. 12
    Rubin, A. E.; Trigo-Rodríguez, J. M.; Huber, H.; Wasson, J. T. Progressive aqueous alteration of CM carbonaceous chondrites. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2007, 71, 23612382,  DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2007.02.008
  13. 13
    Morita, M.; Urashima, S.; Komatani, S.; Yui, H. New analytical method for the evaluation of heterogeneity in cation compositions of dolomites by micro-XRF and Raman spectroscopies. Anal. Sci. 2023, 39, 1279,  DOI: 10.1007/s44211-023-00333-5
  14. 14
    Urashima, S.; Morita, M.; Komatani, S.; Yui, H. Non-destructive estimation of the cation composition of natural carbonates by micro-Raman spectroscopy. Anal. Chim. Acta 2023, 1242, 340798,  DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2023.340798
  15. 15
    Urashima, S.; Nishioka, T.; Yui, H. Micro-Raman spectroscopic analysis on natural carbonates: linear relations found via biaxial plotting of peak frequencies for cation substituted species. Anal. Sci. 2022, 38, 921929,  DOI: 10.1007/s44211-022-00119-1
  16. 16
    Reeder, R. J.; Dollase, W. A. Structural variation in the dolomite-ankerite solid-solution series; an X-ray, Moessbauer, and TEM study. Am. Mineral. 1989, 74, 11591167
  17. 17
    Chai, L.; Navrotsky, A. Synthesis, characterization, and energetics of solid solution along the dolomite-ankerite join, and implications for the stability of ordered CaFe(CO3)2. Am. Mineral. 1996, 81, 11411147,  DOI: 10.2138/am-1996-9-1012
  18. 18
    Sherman, J. The theoretical derivation of fluorescent X-ray intensities from mixtures. Spectrochim. Acta 1955, 7, 283306,  DOI: 10.1016/0371-1951(55)80041-0
  19. 19
    Shiraiwa, T.; Fujino, N. Theoretical Calculation of Fluorescent X-Ray Intensities in Fluorescent X-Ray Spectrochemical Analysis. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 1966, 5, 886,  DOI: 10.1143/JJAP.5.886
  20. 20
    Couture, L. Etude des spectres de vibrations de monocristaux ioniques. Ann. Phys. 1947, 12, 594,  DOI: 10.1051/anphys/194711020005
  21. 21
    White, W. B. The Infrared Spectra of Minerals; Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland, 1974.
  22. 22
    Rutt, H. N.; Nicola, J. H. Raman spectra of carbonates of calcite structure. J. Phys. C, Solid State Phys. 1974, 7, 45224528,  DOI: 10.1088/0022-3719/7/24/015
  23. 23
    Rividi, N.; van Zuilen, M.; Philippot, P.; Menez, B.; Godard, G.; Poidatz, E. Calibration of carbonate composition using micro-Raman analysis: application to planetary surface exploration. Astrobiology 2010, 10, 293309,  DOI: 10.1089/ast.2009.0388
  24. 24
    Spivak, A.; Solopova, N.; Cerantola, V.; Bykova, E.; Zakharchenko, E.; Dubrovinsky, L.; Litvin, Y. Raman study of MgCO3-FeCO3 carbonate solid solution at high pressures up to 55 GPa. Phys. Chem. Miner. 2014, 41, 633638,  DOI: 10.1007/s00269-014-0676-y
  25. 25
    Herman, R. G.; Bogdan, C. E.; Sommer, A. J.; Simpson, D. R. Discrimination among Carbonate Minerals by Raman Spectroscopy Using the Laser Microprobe. Appl. Spectrosc. 1987, 41, 437440,  DOI: 10.1366/0003702874448841
  26. 26
    Dufresne, W. J. B.; Rufledt, C. J.; Marshall, C. P. Raman spectroscopy of the eight natural carbonate minerals of calcite structure. J. Raman Spectrosc. 2018, 49, 19992007,  DOI: 10.1002/jrs.5481
  27. 27
    Kim, Y.; Caumon, M. C.; Barres, O.; Sall, A.; Cauzid, J. Identification and composition of carbonate minerals of the calcite structure by Raman and infrared spectroscopies using portable devices. Spectrochim. Acta, Part A 2021, 261, 119980,  DOI: 10.1016/j.saa.2021.119980
  28. 28
    Nakamura, T.; Matsumoto, M.; Amano, K.; Enokido, Y.; Zolensky, M. E.; Mikouchi, T.; Genda, H.; Tanaka, S.; Zolotov, M. Y.; Kurosawa, K. Formation and evolution of carbonaceous asteroid Ryugu: Direct evidence from returned samples. Science 2023, 379, eabn8671  DOI: 10.1126/science.abn8671
  29. 29
    Nakato, A.; Inada, S.; Furuya, S.; Nishimura, M.; Yada, T.; Abe, M.; Usui, T.; Yoshida, H.; Mikouchi, T.; Sakamoto, K.; Yano, H.; Miura, Y. N.; Takano, Y.; Yamanouchi, S.; Okazaki, R.; Sawada, H.; Tachibana, S. Ryugu particles found outside the hayabusa2 sample container. Geochem. J. 2022, 56, 197222,  DOI: 10.2343/geochemj.GJ22017

Cited By

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!
Citation Statements
Explore this article's citation statements on scite.ai

This article is cited by 2 publications.

  1. Hiroharu Yui, Hayato Tsychiya, Aruto Kashima, Shu-hei Urashima, Kenichi Oguchi, Naoya Imae, Akira Yamaguchi. Magnesium phosphates experienced high-temperature transition found on the CI-like carbonaceous chondrite Yamato 980115 by Raman microspectroscopy. Analytical Sciences 2025, 41 (4) , 323-328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44211-025-00720-0
  2. Shu-hei Urashima, Hayato Tsuchiya, Naoya Imae, Akira Yamaguchi, Hiroharu Yui. Raman spectroscopic analysis of carbonates on a CY-type carbonaceous chondrite Yamato 980115: unexpectedly abundant terrestrial weathering products. Analytical Sciences 2025, https://doi.org/10.1007/s44211-025-00731-x

Analytical Chemistry

Cite this: Anal. Chem. 2024, 96, 1, 170–178
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.3c03463
Published December 28, 2023

Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under

CC-BY 4.0 .

Article Views

1153

Altmetric

-

Citations

Learn about these metrics

Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.

  • Abstract

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. Optical image of the Ryugu particle in AMCC (left, scale bars: 0.5 mm) and the corresponding elemental images for Ca, Mn, Fe, and Mg (four panels in right, scale bars: 0.5 mm).

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. Ca bright spots on the surface of the Ryugu particle by micro-XRF imaging and their corresponding Raman spectra by a Raman microscope. The inset in each spectrum is the corresponding optical image (scale bars: 20 μm). Grayish grains on black matrices are carbonates.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. Biaxial plotting and comparison for Ryugu dolomites and terrestrial references with T- and L-mode wavenumbers. For Ryugu dolomites, the black filled markers represent those obtained at grains A(a)-F, while the open markers represent those obtained at several different spots within grain B. Dol stands for dolomite, and FD stands for ferroan dolomite.

    Figure 4

    Figure 4. Cation composition for Ryugu dolomites. (a) Cation compositions of Ryugu dolomites plotted on a ternary diagram. The filled and open markers represent those obtained at the spot A(a) to F and those within the spot B, respectively. (b) Raman spectra measured at the spots showing typical and irregular compositions. “Typical” spectrum is of the spot A(a) while “Irregular” is of the spot A(c).

  • References


    This article references 29 other publications.

    1. 1
      Aramendia, J.; Gomez-Nubla, L.; Castro, K.; Fdez-Ortiz de Vallejuelo, S.; Arana, G.; Maguregui, M.; Baonza, V.; Medina, J.; Rull, F.; Madariaga, J. Overview of the techniques used for the study of non-terrestrial bodies: Proposition of novel non-destructive methodology. TrAC, Trends Anal. Chem. 2018, 98, 3646,  DOI: 10.1016/j.trac.2017.10.018
    2. 2
      Tsuji, K.; Matsuno, T.; Takimoto, Y.; Yamanashi, M.; Kometani, N.; Sasaki, Y. C.; Hasegawa, T.; Kato, S.; Yamada, T.; Shoji, T.; Kawahara, N. New developments of X-ray fluorescence imaging techniques in laboratory. Spectrochim. Acta, Part B 2015, 113, 4353,  DOI: 10.1016/j.sab.2015.09.001
    3. 3
      Smith, J. V. Tutorial review. Synchrotron X-ray sources: instrumental characteristics. New applications in microanalysis, tomography, absorption spectroscopy and diffraction. Analyst 1995, 120, 12311245,  DOI: 10.1039/an9952001231
    4. 4
      Wada, K.; Grott, M.; Michel, P.; Walsh, K. J.; Barucci, A. M.; Biele, J.; Blum, J.; Ernst, C. M.; Grundmann, J. T.; Gundlach, B.; Hagermann, A.; Hamm, M.; Jutzi, M.; Kim, M. J.; Kührt, E.; Le Corre, L.; Libourel, G.; Lichtenheldt, R.; Maturilli, A.; Messenger, S. R.; Michikami, T.; Miyamoto, H.; Mottola, S.; Müller, T.; Nakamura, A. M.; Nittler, L. R.; Ogawa, K.; Okada, T.; Palomba, E.; Sakatani, N.; Schröder, S. E.; Senshu, H.; Takir, D.; Zolensky, M. E. and International Regolith Science Group (IRSG) in Hayabusa2 project. Asteroid Ryugu before the Hayabusa2 encounter. Prog. Earth Planet. Sci. 2018, 5, 82,  DOI: 10.1186/s40645-018-0237-y
    5. 5
      Yada, T.; Abe, M.; Okada, T.; Nakato, A.; Yogata, K.; Miyazaki, A.; Hatakeda, K.; Kumagai, K.; Nishimura, M.; Hitomi, Y. Preliminary analysis of the Hayabusa2 samples returned from C-type asteroid Ryugu. Nat. Astron. 2021, 6, 214220,  DOI: 10.1038/s41550-021-01550-6
    6. 6
      Yokoyama, T.; Nagashima, K.; Nakai, I.; Young, E. D.; Abe, Y.; Aléon, J.; Alexander, C. M. O.; Amari, S.; Amelin, Y.; Bajo, K. i. Samples returned from the asteroid Ryugu are similar to Ivuna-type carbonaceous meteorites. Science 2023, 379, eabn7850  DOI: 10.1126/science.abn7850
    7. 7
      Brearley, A. J. Meteorites and the Early Solar System II; University of Arizona Press; Lauretta, D. S., McSween, H. Y., Eds., 2006; p 584.
    8. 8
      Fujiya, W.; Kawasaki, N.; Nagashima, K.; Sakamoto, N.; O’D. Alexander, C. M.; Kita, N. T.; Kitajima, K.; Abe, Y.; Aléon, J.; Amari, S. Carbonate record of temporal change in oxygen fugacity and gaseous species in asteroid Ryugu. Nat. Geosci. 2023, 16, 675682,  DOI: 10.1038/s41561-023-01226-y
    9. 9
      Morse, J. W.; Mackenzie, F. T. Geochemistry of Sedimentary Carbonates, 1st ed.; Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.: AE Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2003.
    10. 10
      Endreß, M.; Bischoff, A. Carbonates in CI chondrites: clues to parent body evolution. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1996, 60, 489507,  DOI: 10.1016/0016-7037(95)00399-1
    11. 11
      Johnson, C. A.; Prinz, M. Carbonate compositions in CM and CI chondrites and implications for aqueous alteration. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1993, 57, 28432852,  DOI: 10.1016/0016-7037(93)90393-B
    12. 12
      Rubin, A. E.; Trigo-Rodríguez, J. M.; Huber, H.; Wasson, J. T. Progressive aqueous alteration of CM carbonaceous chondrites. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2007, 71, 23612382,  DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2007.02.008
    13. 13
      Morita, M.; Urashima, S.; Komatani, S.; Yui, H. New analytical method for the evaluation of heterogeneity in cation compositions of dolomites by micro-XRF and Raman spectroscopies. Anal. Sci. 2023, 39, 1279,  DOI: 10.1007/s44211-023-00333-5
    14. 14
      Urashima, S.; Morita, M.; Komatani, S.; Yui, H. Non-destructive estimation of the cation composition of natural carbonates by micro-Raman spectroscopy. Anal. Chim. Acta 2023, 1242, 340798,  DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2023.340798
    15. 15
      Urashima, S.; Nishioka, T.; Yui, H. Micro-Raman spectroscopic analysis on natural carbonates: linear relations found via biaxial plotting of peak frequencies for cation substituted species. Anal. Sci. 2022, 38, 921929,  DOI: 10.1007/s44211-022-00119-1
    16. 16
      Reeder, R. J.; Dollase, W. A. Structural variation in the dolomite-ankerite solid-solution series; an X-ray, Moessbauer, and TEM study. Am. Mineral. 1989, 74, 11591167
    17. 17
      Chai, L.; Navrotsky, A. Synthesis, characterization, and energetics of solid solution along the dolomite-ankerite join, and implications for the stability of ordered CaFe(CO3)2. Am. Mineral. 1996, 81, 11411147,  DOI: 10.2138/am-1996-9-1012
    18. 18
      Sherman, J. The theoretical derivation of fluorescent X-ray intensities from mixtures. Spectrochim. Acta 1955, 7, 283306,  DOI: 10.1016/0371-1951(55)80041-0
    19. 19
      Shiraiwa, T.; Fujino, N. Theoretical Calculation of Fluorescent X-Ray Intensities in Fluorescent X-Ray Spectrochemical Analysis. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 1966, 5, 886,  DOI: 10.1143/JJAP.5.886
    20. 20
      Couture, L. Etude des spectres de vibrations de monocristaux ioniques. Ann. Phys. 1947, 12, 594,  DOI: 10.1051/anphys/194711020005
    21. 21
      White, W. B. The Infrared Spectra of Minerals; Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland, 1974.
    22. 22
      Rutt, H. N.; Nicola, J. H. Raman spectra of carbonates of calcite structure. J. Phys. C, Solid State Phys. 1974, 7, 45224528,  DOI: 10.1088/0022-3719/7/24/015
    23. 23
      Rividi, N.; van Zuilen, M.; Philippot, P.; Menez, B.; Godard, G.; Poidatz, E. Calibration of carbonate composition using micro-Raman analysis: application to planetary surface exploration. Astrobiology 2010, 10, 293309,  DOI: 10.1089/ast.2009.0388
    24. 24
      Spivak, A.; Solopova, N.; Cerantola, V.; Bykova, E.; Zakharchenko, E.; Dubrovinsky, L.; Litvin, Y. Raman study of MgCO3-FeCO3 carbonate solid solution at high pressures up to 55 GPa. Phys. Chem. Miner. 2014, 41, 633638,  DOI: 10.1007/s00269-014-0676-y
    25. 25
      Herman, R. G.; Bogdan, C. E.; Sommer, A. J.; Simpson, D. R. Discrimination among Carbonate Minerals by Raman Spectroscopy Using the Laser Microprobe. Appl. Spectrosc. 1987, 41, 437440,  DOI: 10.1366/0003702874448841
    26. 26
      Dufresne, W. J. B.; Rufledt, C. J.; Marshall, C. P. Raman spectroscopy of the eight natural carbonate minerals of calcite structure. J. Raman Spectrosc. 2018, 49, 19992007,  DOI: 10.1002/jrs.5481
    27. 27
      Kim, Y.; Caumon, M. C.; Barres, O.; Sall, A.; Cauzid, J. Identification and composition of carbonate minerals of the calcite structure by Raman and infrared spectroscopies using portable devices. Spectrochim. Acta, Part A 2021, 261, 119980,  DOI: 10.1016/j.saa.2021.119980
    28. 28
      Nakamura, T.; Matsumoto, M.; Amano, K.; Enokido, Y.; Zolensky, M. E.; Mikouchi, T.; Genda, H.; Tanaka, S.; Zolotov, M. Y.; Kurosawa, K. Formation and evolution of carbonaceous asteroid Ryugu: Direct evidence from returned samples. Science 2023, 379, eabn8671  DOI: 10.1126/science.abn8671
    29. 29
      Nakato, A.; Inada, S.; Furuya, S.; Nishimura, M.; Yada, T.; Abe, M.; Usui, T.; Yoshida, H.; Mikouchi, T.; Sakamoto, K.; Yano, H.; Miura, Y. N.; Takano, Y.; Yamanouchi, S.; Okazaki, R.; Sawada, H.; Tachibana, S. Ryugu particles found outside the hayabusa2 sample container. Geochem. J. 2022, 56, 197222,  DOI: 10.2343/geochemj.GJ22017
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information


    The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.analchem.3c03463.

    • Experimental details of ICP-AES and micro XRF, derivation of eq 3, cation compositions for terrestrial carbonates, detailed pictures of AMCC itself and samples loaded on AMCC, XRF spectra of the terrestrial samples, and Raman spectrum of JDo-1 (PDF)


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.