ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
My Activity
CONTENT TYPES

LOBSTAHS: An Adduct-Based Lipidomics Strategy for Discovery and Identification of Oxidative Stress Biomarkers

View Author Information
Massachusetts Institute of Technology/Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Joint Program in Oceanography, Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543, United States
Department of Marine Chemistry and Geochemistry, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543, United States
Cite this: Anal. Chem. 2016, 88, 14, 7154–7162
Publication Date (Web):June 20, 2016
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.6b01260

Copyright © 2016 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under these Terms of Use.

  • Open Access

Article Views

3497

Altmetric

-

Citations

LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICS
PDF (2 MB)
Supporting Info (1)»

Abstract

Discovery and identification of molecular biomarkers in large LC/MS data sets requires significant automation without loss of accuracy in the compound screening and annotation process. Here, we describe a lipidomics workflow and open-source software package for high-throughput annotation and putative identification of lipid, oxidized lipid, and oxylipin biomarkers in high-mass-accuracy HPLC-MS data. Lipid and oxylipin biomarker screening through adduct hierarchy sequences, or LOBSTAHS, uses orthogonal screening criteria based on adduct ion formation patterns and other properties to identify thousands of compounds while providing the user with a confidence score for each assignment. Assignments are made from one of two customizable databases; the default databases contain 14 068 unique entries. To demonstrate the software’s functionality, we screened more than 340 000 mass spectral features from an experiment in which hydrogen peroxide was used to induce oxidative stress in the marine diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum. LOBSTAHS putatively identified 1969 unique parent compounds in 21 869 features that survived the multistage screening process. While P. tricornutum maintained more than 92% of its core lipidome under oxidative stress, patterns in biomarker distribution and abundance indicated remodeling was both subtle and pervasive. Treatment with 150 μM H2O2 promoted statistically significant carbon-chain elongation across lipid classes, with the strongest elongation accompanying oxidation in moieties of monogalactosyldiacylglycerol, a lipid typically localized to the chloroplast. Oxidative stress also induced a pronounced reallocation of lipidome peak area to triacylglycerols. LOBSTAHS can be used with environmental or experimental data from a variety of systems and is freely available at https://github.com/vanmooylipidomics/LOBSTAHS.

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) represent a persistent source of stress in virtually all biological systems. (1, 2) The negative cellular effects of ROS include protein damage, mutation of DNA, and lipid peroxidation. (3) While the profound effects of oxidative stress have been documented extensively in the lipids of mammals, (4-6) ROS can induce equally significant and wide-ranging remodeling of cell lipidomes in terrestrial and marine plants. (7-9) These ROS can act through a variety of enzymatic and abiotic mechanisms to produce a broad and heterogeneous suite of lipid products whose bioactivity and diversity make them ideal as molecular biomarkers. These products include both oxidized intact polar lipids (ox-IPL; e.g., oxidized phospholipids) (8) and oxylipins, the smaller, direct derivatives of fatty acids. Lipid biomarkers (both oxidized and unoxidized) can be used to characterize the effects of ROS in humans from cancer (10) and other diseases such as atherosclerosis; (11) in the marine environment, lipids can be used to diagnose various sources of biological and abiotic stress, including those imposed by nutrient limitation (12, 13) and viral infection. (14, 15) The potency and specificity that make lipids useful as biomarkers of oxidative stress also support their function as bioactive “infochemicals”. (16-18) In the ocean, for example, oxylipins have been shown to regulate different interspecific interactions among marine microbiota (19-22) and the metabolism of sinking marine particles by heterotrophic bacteria. (23)
For several reasons, there exist few comprehensive methods to screen, identify, and annotate large numbers of these oxylipins and oxidized lipids alongside the many unoxidized lipids from which they can originate. (4, 6) Oxylipins, like their parent lipids, have a wide diversity of structures and biochemical functions. (4, 24, 25) They can be produced enzymatically (9, 26, 27) or abiotically, (28, 29) often occurring in very low abundance relative to their intact polar lipid (IPL) precursors. (6, 30) Finally, unique and tailored computational strategies are required to analyze the large volumes of data necessary for comprehensive lipidomics or metabolomics. (25, 31)
The limited number of analytical strategies developed specifically to assess the effects of oxidative stress on the lipidomes of humans (4) and mammals (32, 33) have generally focused on traditional oxylipins, such as hydroperoxy, hydroxy, epoxy, oxo, and ketol fatty acids, while ignoring most molecular precursors and intermediates. For example, direct-infusion mass spectrometry has been used to identify select oxylipins simultaneously with their unoxidized IPL and ox-IPL precursors in the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana, but these studies used manual data analysis methods to examine oxidation of compounds containing only C16 and C18 fatty acids. (7, 8) Ni et al. employed a shotgun approach to identify oxidized lipids in rat cardiomyocytes, but their analysis was limited only to intact carbonylated phospholipids. (34) The commercial LipidSearch software (Thermo Scientific) can identify some oxidized lipids using MS/MS fragmentation spectra, but this capability does not extend to oxylipins derived from fatty acids.
We developed a new, rules-based screening approach that can be used to identify a broad range of IPL, nonpolar lipids, ox-IPL, and oxylipins in large, high-mass-accuracy HPLC-ESI-MS data sets. Lipid and oxylipin biomarker screening through adduct hierarchy sequences, or LOBSTAHS, is implemented as an open-source package for R (35) and integrates with the existing packages xcms (36-38) and CAMERA. (39) The software is centered around a novel screening methodology that exploits the unique tendency of lipids to form adduct ions in consistent, diagnostic patterns of abundance that remain relatively consistent across sample types (e.g., for phosphatidylcholine in positive ion mode, [M + H]+ > [M + Na]+ > [M + NH4 + ACN]+ > [M + 2Na – H]+ > [M + K]+). Using lipid data from cultures of a mutant strain of a marine diatom designed for studies of oxidative stress, (40) we demonstrate how LOBSTAHS can be used to resolve conflicting compound assignments, examine differential expression of compounds across experimental treatments, discover and identify potential ox-IPL and oxylipin biomarkers, and identify potential isomers and isobars.
LOBSTAHS annotates each compound assignment with a confidence score, allowing the user to define subsets for further analysis. While we apply LOBSTAHS here to identify potential biomarkers in a marine microorganism, it can be applied to any HPLC-ESI-MS data set where the user expects the relative proportions of the various adduct ions of each analyte to remain constant across samples. LOBSTAHS requires data from a mass spectrometer having both high resolving power and high mass accuracy. While we developed the software using data acquired on a Thermo Exactive Plus Orbitrap instrument, LOBSTAHS could be used to analyze data acquired via FTICR-MS or, when sufficient allowances are made for mass resolution, a Q-TOF instrument.

Theory and Design of Software and Databases

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

Design and Scope of Lipid-Oxylipin Databases

LOBSTAHS draws compound assignments from customizable onboard databases that contain structural and adduct ion abundance data for various IPL, nonpolar lipids, ox-IPL, and oxylipins (Tables S1 and S3). Each database entry represents a different adduct ion of a potential analyte; because analytes present differently in positive and negative ionization modes, separate databases must be generated for compound identification in each mode. The standard package installation includes two default databases that contain entries for 14 068 unique compounds, some of them particular to marine algae (Tables S1 and S3). Alternatively, LOBSTAHS allows the user to generate his or her own databases; instructions are provided in the package documentation. The use of onboard databases distinguishes LOBSTAHS from other software packages that rely exclusively on external databases.

Database Generation

Databases are created in LOBSTAHS by pairing empirical data with an in silico simulation. To generate the default databases, we first calculated exact masses for various triacylglycerols (TAG), free fatty acids (FFA), polyunsaturated aldehydes (PUA), and molecules belonging to eight different classes of intact polar diacylglycerol (IP-DAG). Within each of these classes, we calculated the masses of a wide range of possible structures having fatty acid (FA) moieties of different acyl chain length, unsaturation, and oxidation (Table S1). While the default databases include entries for IPL and ox-IPL that contain primarily medium- and long-chain fatty acids, users may generate additional databases with entries for IPL composed of fatty acids of any length. The databases also include exact masses for several photosynthetic pigments common to the marine environment (Tables S1 and S3). TAG and IP-DAG are identified by the “sum composition” (41) of double bonds and acyl carbon atoms in each compound (e.g., PC 34:1, rather than PC 16:0–18:1).

Determination of Relative Abundances of Adduct Ions for Inclusion in Databases

During database generation, LOBSTAHS uses empirical data for the LC/MS adduct ion(s) typically formed by each compound’s parent lipid class (Table S2) to create several entries for each compound. Each of the entries represents a different adduct ion of its parent; the relative ranks of the adducts form the basis for the hierarchy-based screening of compound assignments at the core of our method. Relative adduct ion abundance data were gathered from previous work (42) and analysis of compounds commonly observed in cultures and environmental samples from marine microorganisms. Where possible, we confirmed the results using authentic standards for representative compounds. For ox-IPL, we applied adduct hierarchies observed for the corresponding, unoxidized IPL. We assumed ox-IPL would be unlikely to take charge on their oxidized functional group(s) during ionization, thus forming adducts similar to those of the corresponding unoxidized molecule. We confirmed this similarity in ionization behavior through manual inspection of several samples. Long-chain ox-IPL standards other than those containing aldehyde moieties are not available commercially.
A series of simple tables can be used to define additional analytes and/or adducts beyond those which are included in the default databases. For each new lipid or lipid class, LOBSTAHS requires (1) the elemental composition of the new lipid or parent moiety of the new lipid class, (2) a tabulation of expected adducts (defining, as necessary, any new adducts), (3) empirical adduct hierarchy data for any new adducts, and (4) if applicable, the ranges of acyl carbon atoms, double bonds, and oxidization states for which entries are to be generated. Specific instructions are contained in the online documentation for the software.

Lipidomics Workflow Based on xcms, CAMERA, and LOBSTAHS

Because high resolving power and high mass accuracy alone are often not sufficient to resolve isobaric ions or to distinguish among species that have identical monoisotopic masses but different elemental compositions, (44) we employ high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) in lieu of a simple direct-infusion approach. Data must first be converted to an open-source format (.mzXML) and, if necessary, from profile to centroid mode. If data are acquired using ion mode switching, LOBSTAHS requires that positive and negative ion mode scan data also be extracted into separate files. Procedural details and an R script that can be used to automate these steps for data obtained from an Orbitrap instrument are described in the Supporting Information. For purposes of the present study, we consider two ions to be isobaric when the underlying features have different exact masses but the m/z difference is less than the instrument’s demonstrated mass accuracy (in this case, 2.5 ppm). Once data files have been converted and extracted, the existing R packages xcms (36-38) and CAMERA (39) are used for feature detection, peak grouping, chromatographic alignment, identification of pseudospectra, and discovery of features representing possible secondary isotope peaks (Scheme 1, “Pre-processing & feature detection”).

Scheme 1

Scheme 1. Preparation, Screening, and Annotation of HPLC-MS Lipid Data Using LOBSTAHSi

Scheme aWe automate several functions of the ProteoWizard msConvert tool. (43)

Scheme b,cxcms (36-38) was chosen for its command-line features and because it permits follow-on use of the R package CAMERA (39) to identify isotopes.

Scheme dIPO (54) can be used to optimize the values of parameters for some xcms and CAMERA functions.

Scheme eMultiple assignments will likely exist for many peakgroups in a typical data set.

Scheme fThis criterion may be useful when the subject data set contains lipids of exclusively eukaryotic origin.

Scheme gIn the case of C2a, the adduct ion hierarchy for the parent compound is completely satisfied; i.e., the pseudospectrum contains peakgroups representing every adduct ion of the compound of greater theoretical abundance than the least abundant adduct ion present. In the case of C2b, the adduct ion of greatest theoretical abundance and some lesser adduct ion is present, but adduct ions of intermediate abundance are not observed.

Scheme hBoth outcomes may apply simultaneously at this decision point if the data set contains isobars and isomers of the assignment.

Scheme iAnnotation codes (in bold) may be applied as indicated; these are designed to assist the user in evaluating assignment confidence during subsequent data analysis.

Database Assignments and Progressive Screening in LOBSTAHS Using Orthogonal Criteria

After preprocessing, screening and annotation are performed according to the workflow in Scheme 1. First, initial compound assignments are applied to features from the database using a narrow m/z mass tolerance specified by the user in ppm. A series of optional orthogonal screening criteria can then be applied to the features and their assignments. First, users may exclude from the data set any features representing secondary isotope peaks; the presence of these features can be a significant obstacle in metabolomics. (45-47) We programmed LOBSTAHS to exclude these secondary peaks, rather than merge the elements of each feature’s isotopic envelope into a single parameter. (46)
Next, LOBSTAHS can screen the feature’s retention time against a retention time “window” defined for the accompanying assignment’s parent lipid class. LOBSTAHS includes a set of default retention time window data (Table S4) for the chromatographic conditions we describe here. Detailed instructions for application of retention time data from other chromatographic methods are included in the Supporting Information. A third filter can then be applied to exclude assignments of IPL, ox-IPL, FFA, and PUA that contain an odd total number of acyl carbon atoms. We envision that this filter would be applied to data of exclusively eukaryotic origin: Since nonacetogenic fatty acid synthesis is confined almost exclusively to bacteria and archaea, (48) FA synthesized by eukaryotes will be composed of an even total number of carbon atoms.
After applying these initial optional criteria, LOBSTAHS then screens each assignment using adduct ion hierarchy data (Scheme 1, “Application of core adduct ion hierarchy screening rules”; Table S2). This screening serves as the primary orthogonal filter to eliminate any confounding secondary isotopes and unassigned lipid-extractable features still remaining in the data set. During this process, LOBSTAHS uses a series of rules to compare the relative abundance ranks of sets of adduct ion assignments that have the same parent compound. The package makes several annotations using simple codes that indicate the degree to which the assignment complies with the hierarchy rules (Scheme 1, in bold). Assignments that fail the adduct ion hierarchy screening criteria are excised from the data set, and all remaining assignments in the data set are then pooled.
Additional rules-based screening is then performed on the pooled data to identify and annotate possible isomers and isobars (Scheme 1, “Isomer & isobar detection, annotation”). Codes can be applied to identify positional or regioisomers (code C3r), functional structural isomers (code C3f), or isobars (code C3c). LOBSTAHS can apply several of these different codes to a given assignment as long as the criterion for each is satisfied. Upon completion of screening, LOBSTAHS produces an R object containing the annotated data set. Statistical analysis can then be performed in R on the final matrix of compound assignments, or the results can be exported to a .csv file for external analysis.

Experimental Section

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

Model Data Set Used To Demonstrate the Workflow

To demonstrate LOBSTAHS, we applied the workflow in Scheme 1 to examine the effect of oxidative stress on a model algal lipidome. For the analysis, we used lipid data collected from cultures of a mutant strain of the marine diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum, which was designed for studies of oxidative stress. In the study, (40) a strain of P. tricornutum (CCMP2561; Provasoli-Guillard National Center for Marine Algae and Microbiota) was genetically modified (49) to express a reduction–oxidation sensitive green fluorescent protein (roGFP) at different locations within the cell. (50, 51) Cultures of the transformants were treated with three concentrations of H2O2 (0, 30, and 150 μmol L–1) to evaluate the effects of peroxidation; culture conditions are described in van Creveld et al. (40)

Sample Collection and Extraction

In the experiment, duplicate samples for lipid analysis were collected from each treatment at 4, 8, and 24 h time points. Two procedural blanks were also collected. Sample material was collected by vacuum onto 0.7 μm pore size glass fiber filters (GF/F), which were snap frozen in liquid nitrogen and then stored at −80 °C until thawed for extraction. Extraction was performed using a modified Bligh and Dyer (52) method described in Popendorf et al.; (42) an internal standard (dinitrophenyl-phosphatidylethanolamine, DNP-PE) and a synthetic antioxidant (butylated hydroxytoluene, BHT) were added at the time of extraction. Lipid extracts were transferred to 2 mL HPLC vials, topped with argon, and stored at −80 °C prior to analysis. All chemicals used in sample extraction and chromatography were LC/MS grade or higher. Where used, water was obtained from a Milli-Q system without further treatment (EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA).

HPLC-ESI-MS Analysis

Samples from the P. tricornutum data set were analyzed by HPLC-ESI-MS using a modification of the method described in Hummel et al. (53) Lipid extracts were evaporated to near dryness and reconstituted in a similar volume of 7:3 acetonitrile/isopropanol. Headspace was filled with argon to minimize further oxidation. For HPLC analysis, an Agilent 1200 system (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) comprising temperature-controlled autosampler (4 °C), binary pump, and diode array detector was coupled to a Thermo Exactive Plus Orbitrap mass spectrometer (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Chromatographic conditions, electrospray ionization source settings, MS acquisition settings, and procedures used for calibration of the mass spectrometer are described in the Supporting Information. Using authentic standards and two independent methods for MS feature detection, we determined the average relative mass uncertainty of the exactive was <0.2 ppm (Tables 1 and S6); evaluation of these standards is discussed below.
Table 1. Evaluation of Lipidomics Method Performance using IPL Standards
lipid classorigin of standardmoieties present in standardadominant positive mode adduct ionion exact m/zobserved m/zbrel. mass uncertainty (ppm)ccorrect LOBSTAHS ID?confidence in assignment after adduct hierarchy screeningdstructural isomers or isobars present after screening?
MGDGnatural34:0[M + NH4]+776.6246776.62480.2yeshighno
 36:0[M + NH4]+804.6559804.65610.3yeshighno
DNP-PEsynthetic32:0[M + NH4]+875.5505875.55070.2yeshighno
SQDGnatural34:3[M + NH4]+834.5396834.53980.2yeshighno
 34:2[M + NH4]+836.5552836.55540.2yeshighno
PGsynthetic32:0[M + NH4]+740.5436740.54380.3yeshighno
PEsynthetic32:0[M + H]+692.5225692.52270.3yeshighno
PCsynthetic32:0[M + H]+734.5694734.56960.2yeshighno
DGDGnatural34:2[M + NH4]+934.6462934.64630.1yeshighyes
 36:4[M + NH4]+958.6462958.64630.1yeshighyes
mean     0.2   
a

Multiple moieties were present in glycolipid standards purified from natural samples; only predominant moieties are shown.

b

Mean observed m/z ratio in 5 independent samples.

c

See the following equation:

d

“High confidence”: Assignment fully satisfied all adduct hierarchy rules and other screening criteria.

Analysis of P. tricornutum Data Using LOBSTAHS

xcms, CAMERA, and LOBSTAHS were then used to identify and annotate lipidome components in the positive ionization mode data. The R package IPO (54) was used to optimize settings for several xcms functions, and a 2.5 ppm mass uncertainty tolerance was used to obtain database matches in LOBSTAHS. Using the annotated output we obtained from LOBSTAHS, we then calculated the relative abundances of lipidome constituents present in the 0 and 150 μM H2O2 treatments at 24 h. Statistical techniques were used to identify biomarkers of oxidative stress. Unless otherwise noted, we restricted our analysis to only “high confidence” assignments; these were assignments without structural isomers or isobars given codes of C1 or C2a according to the logic in Scheme 1. The specific settings used in xcms, CAMERA, and LOBSTAHS, details of statistical methods, and links to scripts we used to obtain results and figures are included in the Supporting Information text and Table S5.

Results and Discussion

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

Screening and Annotation of P. tricornutum Data in LOBSTAHS

Using LOBSTAHS, we identified 21 869, or 6.4%, of the 340 991 mass spectral features initially detected in the data set using xcms. Sequential application of the various screening criteria allowed us to exclude features from the data set based on specific characteristics (Table 2). Of these initial features, 177 053, or 52%, were immediately eliminated as likely secondary isotope peaks identified by CAMERA. The 163 938 remaining features were then matched at 2.5 ppm against entries in the default positive mode database. We then used LOBSTAHS to perform screening based on feature retention time and assignment total acyl carbon number. LOBSTAHS excluded 7792 features because the retention time fell outside the range expected for the assignment’s parent lipid class. An additional 7733 features were eliminated because the compound assignment did not contain an even total number of acyl carbon atoms; this optional restriction was applied given the known eukaryotic origin of the data. Adduct ion hierarchy screening was then applied to the remaining 52 337 features. Application of this final orthogonal filter yielded a data set containing 2056 compound assignments; these assignments represented 1969 unique parent compounds (Table 2).
Table 2. Progressive Screening and Annotation of the P. tricornutum Dataset using xcms, CAMERA, and LOBSTAHS
 no. present in data set
operation(s) appliedpeakspeak groupsdatabase assignmentsaunique parent compounds
xcms and CAMERA    
initial feature detection; preprocessing340 99118 314  
LOBSTAHS    
eliminate secondary isotope peaks163 93812 146  
apply initial compound assignments from database67 862507715 92914 076
apply RT screening criteria60 070445113 50411 779
exclude IP-DAG/TAG with odd total no. of acyl C atoms52 337387174586283
adduct ion hierarchy screening21 86915952056b1969
a

Figure reflects all assignments from database, including photosynthetic pigments.

b

1163, or 57%, of these had no competing assignments such as functional structural isomers or isobars; these 1163 assignments represented 990 unique parent compounds.

The identities of 1163, or 57%, of these final database assignments were unique within the scope of our database, meaning the underlying features were matched in the final data set to only one possible parent compound. 1149 of these assignments were IPL, ox-IPL, or TAG (Figure 1a); the remainder were photosynthetic pigments. We classified 1056 of these identifications as “high confidence,” indicating that the distribution of adducts present in the constituent features perfectly satisfied the adduct hierarchy rules (Figure 1a and symbols with darkest tones in Figures S2–S10); these were used in the analysis below.

Figure 1

Figure 1. (a) All IPL, ox-IPL, and TAG identified in the P. tricornutum data set with high confidence (N = 1039; figure excludes pigments). (b) Distribution by lipid class of high-confidence assignments made in the 0 and 150 μM H2O2 treatments at 24 h (N = 894 and N = 848, respectively). Ellipse size in (b) reflects the number of compounds identified within each class and treatment. The assignments presented in (a) and (b) fully satisfied the LOBSTAHS adduct hierarchy screening criteria (i.e., annotated “C1” or “C2a” according to the logic in Scheme 1) and had no competing assignments, such as possible structural isomers, identified in the data set. Excluded are those compounds having an odd total number of acyl carbon atoms. aGeneral direction of movement within m/z versus RT plot, for a given lipid class and oxidation state. The direction of movement that results from addition or removal of additional oxygen atom(s) varies by lipid class. bNot to scale.

Identification and Annotation of Isomers and Isobars

The remaining 893 assignments (43.4%) were characterized by some degree of ambiguity, meaning the data set contained at least one isobar or structural functional isomer of the underlying features (Table S7; symbols with lightest tones in Figures S2–S10). In 752 instances, the dominant adduct of the parent compound was a (functional) structural isomer of the dominant adduct of a different compound assigned from the database (Chart S1, first example). In 195 cases, the dominant adduct ion of the parent compound was an isobar of the primary adduct ion of a different compound (Chart S1, second example). Although these ambiguous assignments represented 43.4% of all assignments in the screened data set, they belonged to just 25% of retained features (27% of peak groups; Table S7). The difference was due to the presence of a small number of features (793) whose 54 assignments were doubly ambiguous, i.e., having both isobars and functional structural isomers (symbols with two-tone shading in Figures S2–S10; Chart S1, third example). The number of competing assignments for each identified compound varied largely by lipid class. For example, LOBSTAHS found no functional structural isomers for compounds identified in several lipid classes: digalactosyldiacylglycerol (DGDG), phosphatidylethanolamine (PE), and sulfoquinovosyldiacylglycerol (SQDG) (Figures S3, S7, and S9). Doubly ambiguous assignments were confined to only four classes: diacylglyceryl carboxyhydroxymethylcholin (DGCC), diacylglyceryl trimethylhomoserine and diacylglyceryl hydroxymethyl-trimethyl-β-alanine (DGTS and DGTA), phosphatidylcholine (PC), and phosphatidylglycerol (PG) (Figures S2, S4, S6, and S8).

Annotation of Potential Regioisomers

LOBSTAHS also identified regioisomers for 352 unique parent compounds in the P. tricornutum lipidome (Table S7; symbols with black dots in Figures S2–S10). These were instances in which the same assignment was applied to two or more features appearing at different retention times in the same sample. Many of these assignments were oxylipins and ox-IPL, indicating the presence of multiple oxidized isomers of the same parent IPL that could be used as biomarkers for oxidative stress. Without further analysis, we were unable to determine whether these isomers represented the oxidation of a fatty acid by the same mechanism at a different acyl carbon position or instead the presence of different oxidized functional groups that yielded equivalent exact masses (e.g., a dihydroxy-, hydroperoxy-, or α- or γ-ketol acid). The level of identification and annotation provided by LOBSTAHS supports a wide range of possible molecular structures for each assignment; an example from the data set is presented in Chart S1. The data were consistent with studies in both model plant (7, 8) and animal (34) systems that demonstrated the coexistence of a diversity of ox-IPL with both their parent IPL and smaller, traditional oxylipin degradation products.

Evaluation of Screening and Identification Performance Using Two Methods

As a means of validating the accuracy and reliability of our approach, we asked LOBSTAHS to identify and annotate all species present in 5 quality control (QC) samples of known composition that were interspersed randomly with samples from the P. tricornutum data set prior to analysis on the mass spectrometer (Table 1; Table S6). The samples contained a mixture of authentic IPL standards that has been used extensively in other work in our laboratory. (42, 55) Because the choice of preprocessing software can have a significant impact on feature detection, (56) we conducted parallel analyses with both xcms/CAMERA and an alternative program, MAVEN. (47, 57) In both cases, LOBSTAHS correctly identified all components of the standard mixture without ambiguity (Table 1; Table S6). Because purified standards do not exist for long-chain ox-IPL, we were unable to directly evaluate the Type 1 error rate for their identification. As a second means of validation, we compared assignments in the screened data set to two independent inventories of the P. tricornutum lipidome. (58, 59) LOBSTAHS found and identified with high confidence 13 of the 16 most abundant IPL and TAG species in one inventory (58) and nearly all those in the other. (59) While our approach also correctly identified the three remaining components in the former study (PG 32:1, PG 36, and DGTS and DGTA 40:10), functional structural isomers or isobars made unambiguous identification impossible without further manual inspection of ms2 spectra.

Resilience of Core P. tricornutum Lipidome under Oxidative Stress

Evidence of the effect of oxidative stress on the lipidome of P. tricornutum was observed through comparison of compounds identified in 0 and 150 μM H2O2 treatments at 24 h (Figures 1 and 2a,b and Table S9). That the two treatments produced only subtle differences in molecular diversity (Figure 1b) suggests much of the core lipid inventory remained robust to the imposed oxidative stress. The vast majority of the 949 oxidized and unoxidized lipid moieties we identified in the healthy organism (879, or 92.6%) could still be identified in the lipidome of the stressed cultures (Figure 1b). On the basis of peak area, oxidized lipid moieties accounted for 5–7% of the P. tricornutum lipidome across nearly all treatments and time points. On the basis of the relatively consistent size of this oxidized lipid fraction and its persistence in even the 0 μM H2O2 treatment, we consider it a quantitative constraint on the baseline level of lipid peroxidation associated with metabolic processes in photosynthetic organisms. (1, 2)

Figure 2

Figure 2. Remodeling of the Phaeodactylum tricornutum lipidome after 24 h, as visualized from data analyzed with LOBSTAHS. (a) Heatmap showing relative abundances across two treatments (0 and 150 μM H2O2) of all IPL, ox-IPL, and TAG identified with high confidence. Each row (N = 896) represents a different compound identified from the database; Figure S11 contains an expanded version of the plot that includes labels for each individual compound. (b) Heatmap detail, showing changes in the most abundant (N = 40) moieties of monogalactosyldiacylglycerol (MGDG), a lipid typically localized to the chloroplast. (c) Fraction of total peak area identified as triacylglycerol (TAG) at three time points during the experiment. Error bars are ± SD of two replicates. In (a) and (b), shading shows the relative abundance of each compound as a fold difference of the mean peak area observed in that treatment from the mean peak area of the compound observed across all treatments. Dendrogram clustering and group definitions were determined by similarity profile analysis. (60) The numbers and identities of the components assigned to each group in (a) are given in Table S5 and Figure S11. Solid black lines in the dendrogram indicate branching that was statistically significant (P ≤ 0.01).

Differences in Degree of Remodeling between Lipid Classes and Functional Groupings

We used similarity profile analysis of the scaled LOBSTAHS data (60) to place the annotated features into 181 groups of components which clustered significantly according to their behavior (Figures 2 and S11). The components of each group are given in Table S8. We further examined the up- and downregulation of lipidome components under oxidative stress by dividing potential biomarkers into classes based on their molecular headgroups (Table S9). This allowed us to examine class-specific differences in the number of acyl carbon atoms, acyl carbon-to-carbon double bonds, and oxidation states (i.e., additional oxygen atoms) of component lipids under the two treatments. Differential expression of chemical properties within several classes (Figure 2; Table S9) suggested the P. tricornutum lipidome was remodeled in subtle but pervasive ways.

Fatty Acid Chain Elongation Is an Apparent Response to Oxidative Stress in the Chloroplast

Oxidative stress appeared to induce elongation of fatty acids throughout the P. tricornutum lipidome (Table S9). Lipid moieties upregulated by oxidative stress had longer fatty acid chains than those that were downregulated. We observed the greatest breadth of structural change in monogalactosyldiacylglycerol (MGDG), a lipid typically localized to the chloroplast (Table S9; Figure 2b). Moieties of MGDG upregulated in the 150 μM H2O2 treatment had significantly longer fatty acid chains and were more oxidized than those downregulated under oxidative stress; oxidation and elongation were also accompanied by a statistically significant decrease in acyl chain unsaturation (Table S9). The MGDG moieties responsible for these shifts in class structural properties were confined largely to groups 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 9, 12, 166, 167, and 180 in our similarity profile analysis (Figures 2b and S11; Table S8). Lipid oxidation has been previously linked in the diatom Skeletonema costatum to lipolytic cleavage of MGDG and phospholipids within the chloroplast, resulting in oxylipin production from free fatty acids. (61) While intact oxidized MGDG species have not been previously observed in algae, ox-MGDG have been documented in terrestrial plants upon wounding. (8) The production of ox-IPL in Arabidopsis thaliana may be a means of binding ROS within the cell membrane to limit damage elsewhere. (62)

Significant Enrichment Observed in TAG

Whereas the impact of oxidative stress within most lipid classes was confined to relatively modest changes in structural properties, treatment with 150 μM H2O2 induced a very significant enrichment in the fraction of peak area we identified as triacylglycerols (TAG; Figure 2c). Enigmatically, the TAG moieties upregulated in the 150 μM treatment were significantly less oxidized than those downregulated (Table S9). We hypothesize that the growth of this chemically reduced TAG pool may be evidence of enhanced de novo production of unoxidized TAG as a response to oxidative stress. Increased TAG synthesis is a known response to nutrient starvation in virtually all algae, (63, 64) including P. tricornutum. (58, 59) While increased TAG production in algae has not been previously linked directly to oxidative stress, increased production has been observed as a response to viral infection in the haptophyte alga Emiliania huxleyi. (65)

Conclusions

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

Using a model data set, LOBSTAHS allowed us to identify differences in lipid speciation between treatments that could be used as potential indicators of oxidative stress in P. tricornutum. This potential extended beyond individual oxylipins and ox-IPL to sets of highly interrelated compounds that represented different stages of degradation and oxidation within the same lipidome (Figures 2 and S11; Table S8). While we demonstrated our approach using culture data from a single marine diatom, we designed LOBSTAHS so it can be used with exact-mass HPLC/MS data from virtually any experiment or natural system.
For a minority of features in the screened data set that had isobars and/or structural isomers (Table S7; Figures S2–S10), we were unable to make unambiguous identifications using LOBSTAHS alone. Many of these could be identified more rigorously through comparison with results from alternative commercial software or by manual inspection using authentic standards or diagnostic MS fragmentation patterns. Our objective, however, was not to definitively characterize a few individual compounds with absolute certainty but instead to putatively identify a broad range of possible biomarkers for further analysis and discovery. In doing so, LOBSTAHS achieves a level of certainty between Level 3 (“Putatively characterized compound classes”) and Level 2 (“Putatively annotated compounds”), using the scheme of Sumner et al. (66) The overall results we obtained with the P. tricornutum data set demonstrate the ability of LOBSTAHS to assist in this task. The screening and annotation process allowed us to assess a range of levels of confidence on the putative assignments, producing an ample subset of high-confidence compound identifications sufficient to facilitate a detailed statistical analysis. Future integration of methods such as chiral HPLC (67) or matching of diagnostic ms2 fragmentation spectra, with screening tools such as the one we present here, will assist in discovery of biomarkers in larger data sets and with even greater confidence.

Supporting Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b01260.

  • Methodological details, instructions for obtaining all software and data, supplementary discussion, supplementary data figures, supplementary data tables, and a supplementary chart showing examples of the types of isomers that can be identified with LOBSTAHS (PDF)

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

  • Corresponding Author
    • James R. Collins - Massachusetts Institute of Technology/Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Joint Program in Oceanography, Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543, United StatesDepartment of Marine Chemistry and Geochemistry, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543, United States Email: [email protected]
  • Authors
    • Bethanie R. Edwards - Massachusetts Institute of Technology/Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Joint Program in Oceanography, Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543, United StatesDepartment of Marine Chemistry and Geochemistry, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543, United States
    • Helen F. Fredricks - Department of Marine Chemistry and Geochemistry, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543, United States
    • Benjamin A. S. Van Mooy - Department of Marine Chemistry and Geochemistry, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543, United States
  • Notes
    The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgment

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

We thank Elizabeth Kujawinski, Winn Johnson, and Krista Longnecker for discussions on the analysis of metabolomics datasets and assistance with xcms; Marian Carlson and Matthew Johnson for discussions on the effects of oxidative stress in microorganisms; Eugene Melamud for answering our many questions about MAVEN; Assaf Vardi and Daniella Schatz for providing the P. tricornutum cell cultures. Liz Kujawinski provided thoughtful feedback on an earlier version of the manuscript. Finally, we thank two anonymous reviewers for critical comments that improved the manuscript significantly. This research was supported by the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation through Grant GBMF3301 to B.A.S.V.M. This research was also funded in part by a grant to B.A.S.V.M. from the Simons Foundation and is a contribution of the Simons Collaboration on Ocean Processes and Ecology (SCOPE). J.R.C. acknowledges support from a U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) STAR Graduate Fellowship (Fellowship Assistance Agreement No. FP-91744301-0).

References

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

This article references 67 other publications.

  1. 1
    Apel, K.; Hirt, H. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2004, 55, 373 399 DOI: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.55.031903.141701
  2. 2
    Crastes de Paulet, A.; Douste-Blazy, L.; Paoletti, R. Free Radicals, Lipoproteins, and Membrane Lipids; Plenum Publishing Corporation: New York, 1988.
  3. 3
    Lesser, M. P. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 2006, 68, 253 278 DOI: 10.1146/annurev.physiol.68.040104.110001
  4. 4
    Strassburg, K.; Huijbrechts, A. M.; Kortekaas, K. A.; Lindeman, J. H.; Pedersen, T. L.; Dane, A.; Berger, R.; Brenkman, A.; Hankemeier, T.; van Duynhoven, J.; Kalkhoven, E.; Newman, J. W.; Vreeken, R. J. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2012, 404, 1413 1426 DOI: 10.1007/s00216-012-6226-x
  5. 5
    Kuhn, H.; Borngraber, S. In Lipoxygenases and Their Metabolites; Nigam, S.; Pace-Asciak, C. R., Eds.; Kluwer Academic: New York, 1999; pp 5 28.
  6. 6
    Wenk, M. R. Cell 2010, 143, 888 895 DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.11.033
  7. 7
    Buseman, C. M.; Tamura, P.; Sparks, A. A.; Baughman, E. J.; Maatta, S.; Zhao, J.; Roth, M. R.; Esch, S. W.; Shah, J.; Williams, T. D.; Welti, R. Plant Physiol. 2006, 142, 28 39 DOI: 10.1104/pp.106.082115
  8. 8
    Vu, H. S.; Tamura, P.; Galeva, N. A.; Chaturvedi, R.; Roth, M. R.; Williams, T. D.; Wang, X.; Shah, J.; Welti, R. Plant Physiol. 2012, 158, 324 339 DOI: 10.1104/pp.111.190280
  9. 9
    Andreou, A.; Brodhun, F.; Feussner, I. Prog. Lipid Res. 2009, 48, 148 170 DOI: 10.1016/j.plipres.2009.02.002
  10. 10
    Thomas, A.; Patterson, N. H.; Marcinkiewicz, M. M.; Lazaris, A.; Metrakos, P.; Chaurand, P. Anal. Chem. 2013, 85, 2860 2866 DOI: 10.1021/ac3034294
  11. 11
    Haller, E.; Stübiger, G.; Lafitte, D.; Lindner, W.; Lämmerhofer, M. Anal. Chem. 2014, 86, 9954 9961 DOI: 10.1021/ac502855n
  12. 12
    Carini, P.; Van Mooy, B. A. S.; Thrash, J. C.; White, A.; Zhao, Y.; Campbell, E. O.; Fredricks, H. F.; Giovannoni, S. J. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2015, 112, 7767 7772 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1505034112
  13. 13
    Van Mooy, B. A. S.; Fredricks, H. F.; Pedler, B. E.; Dyhrman, S. T.; Karl, D. M.; Koblizek, M.; Lomas, M. W.; Mincer, T. J.; Moore, L. R.; Moutin, T.; Rappe, M. S.; Webb, E. A. Nature 2009, 458, 69 72 DOI: 10.1038/nature07659
  14. 14
    Fulton, J. M.; Fredricks, H. F.; Bidle, K. D.; Vardi, A.; Kendrick, B. J.; DiTullio, G. R.; Van Mooy, B. A. S. Environ. Microbiol. 2014, 16, 1137 1149 DOI: 10.1111/1462-2920.12358
  15. 15
    Vardi, A.; Van Mooy, B. A. S.; Fredricks, H. F.; Popendorf, K. J.; Ossolinski, J. E.; Haramaty, L.; Bidle, K. D. Science 2009, 326, 861 865 DOI: 10.1126/science.1177322
  16. 16
    Ianora, A.; Miralto, A. Ecotoxicology 2010, 19, 493 511 DOI: 10.1007/s10646-009-0434-y
  17. 17
    Vardi, A. Commun. Integr. Biol. 2008, 1, 134 136 DOI: 10.4161/cib.1.2.6867
  18. 18
    Pohnert, G. In Algal Chemical Ecology; Amsler, C. D., Ed.; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 2008; pp 195 202.
  19. 19
    Casotti, R.; Mazza, S.; Brunet, C.; Vantrepotte, V.; Ianora, A.; Miralto, A. J. Phycol. 2005, 41, 7 20 DOI: 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2005.04052.x
  20. 20
    Miralto, A.; Barone, G.; Romano, G.; Poulet, S. A.; Ianora, A.; Russo, G. L.; Buttino, I.; Mazzarella, G.; Laabir, M.; Cabrini, M.; Giacobbe, M. G. Nature 1999, 402, 173 176 DOI: 10.1038/46023
  21. 21
    Balestra, C.; Alonso-Saez, L.; Gasol, J. M.; Casotti, R. Aquat. Microb. Ecol. 2011, 63, 123 131 DOI: 10.3354/ame01486
  22. 22
    Ribalet, F.; Intertaglia, L.; Lebaron, P.; Casotti, R. Aquat. Toxicol. 2008, 86, 249 255 DOI: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2007.11.005
  23. 23
    Edwards, B. R.; Bidle, K. D.; Van Mooy, B. A. S. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2015, 112, 5909 5914 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1422664112
  24. 24
    Brügger, B. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2014, 83, 79 98 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-060713-035324
  25. 25
    Holčapek, M. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2015, 407, 4971 4972 DOI: 10.1007/s00216-015-8740-0
  26. 26
    Andreou, A.; Feussner, I. Phytochemistry 2009, 70, 1504 1510 DOI: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2009.05.008
  27. 27
    Lamari, N.; Ruggiero, M. V.; d’Ippolito, G.; Kooistra, W. H. C. F.; Fontana, A.; Montresor, M. PLoS One 2013, 8, e73281 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073281
  28. 28
    Girotti, A. W. J. Lipid Res. 1998, 39, 1529 1542
  29. 29
    Triantaphylides, C.; Krischke, M.; Hoeberichts, F. A.; Ksas, B.; Gresser, G.; Havaux, M.; Van Breusegem, F.; Mueller, M. J. Plant Physiol. 2008, 148, 960 968 DOI: 10.1104/pp.108.125690
  30. 30
    Sparvero, L. J.; Amoscato, A. A.; Kochanek, P. M.; Pitt, B. R.; Kagan, V. E.; Bayır, H. J. Neurochem. 2010, 115, 1322 1336 DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2010.07055.x
  31. 31
    Spickett, C. M.; Pitt, A. R. Antioxid. Redox Signaling 2015, 22, 1646 1666 DOI: 10.1089/ars.2014.6098
  32. 32
    Balvers, M. G.; Verhoeckx, K. C.; Bijlsma, S.; Rubingh, C. M.; Meijerink, J.; Wortelboer, H. M.; Witkamp, R. F. Metabolomics 2012, 8, 1130 1147 DOI: 10.1007/s11306-012-0421-9
  33. 33
    Bruins, M. J.; Dane, A. D.; Strassburg, K.; Vreeken, R. J.; Newman, J. W.; Salem, N., Jr.; Tyburczy, C.; Brenna, J. T. J. Lipid Res. 2013, 54, 1598 1607 DOI: 10.1194/jlr.M034918
  34. 34
    Ni, Z.; Milic, I.; Fedorova, M. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2015, 407, 5161 5173 DOI: 10.1007/s00216-015-8536-2
  35. 35
    R Core Team. R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2015.
  36. 36
    Smith, C. A.; Want, E. J.; O’Maille, G.; Abagyan, R.; Siuzdak, G. Anal. Chem. 2006, 78, 779 787 DOI: 10.1021/ac051437y
  37. 37
    Tautenhahn, R.; Boettcher, C.; Neumann, S. BMC Bioinf. 2008, 9, 504 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-9-504
  38. 38
    Benton, H. P.; Want, E. J.; Ebbels, T. M. D. Bioinformatics 2010, 26, 2488 2489 DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq441
  39. 39
    Kuhl, C.; Tautenhahn, R.; Bottcher, C.; Larson, T. R.; Neumann, S. Anal. Chem. 2012, 84, 283 289 DOI: 10.1021/ac202450g
  40. 40
    van Creveld, S. G.; Rosenwasser, S.; Schatz, D.; Koren, I.; Vardi, A. ISME J. 2015, 9, 385 395 DOI: 10.1038/ismej.2014.136
  41. 41
    Husen, P.; Tarasov, K.; Katafiasz, M.; Sokol, E.; Vogt, J.; Baumgart, J.; Nitsch, R.; Ekroos, K.; Ejsing, C. S. PLoS One 2013, 8, e79736 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079736
  42. 42
    Popendorf, K. J.; Fredricks, H. F.; Van Mooy, B. A. S. Lipids 2013, 48, 185 195 DOI: 10.1007/s11745-012-3748-0
  43. 43
    Kessner, D.; Chambers, M.; Burke, R.; Agus, D.; Mallick, P. Bioinformatics 2008, 24, 2534 2536 DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn323
  44. 44
    Kind, T.; Fiehn, O. BMC Bioinf. 2006, 7, 234 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-7-234
  45. 45
    Ejsing, C. S.; Duchoslav, E.; Sampaio, J.; Simons, K.; Bonner, R.; Thiele, C.; Ekroos, K.; Shevchenko, A. Anal. Chem. 2006, 78, 6202 6214 DOI: 10.1021/ac060545x
  46. 46
    Layre, E.; Sweet, L.; Hong, S.; Madigan, C. A.; Desjardins, D.; Young, D. C.; Cheng, T. Y.; Annand, J. W.; Kim, K.; Shamputa, I. C.; McConnell, M. J.; Debono, C. A.; Behar, S. M.; Minnaard, A. J.; Murray, M.; Barry, C. E., 3rd; Matsunaga, I.; Moody, D. B. Chem. Biol. 2011, 18, 1537 1549 DOI: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2011.10.013
  47. 47
    Clasquin, M. F.; Melamud, E.; Rabinowitz, J. D. Curr. Protoc Bioinformatics 2012, 37, 14.11.1 14.11.23 DOI: 10.1002/0471250953.bi1411s37
  48. 48
    Pearson, A. In Treatise on Geochemistry; Holland, H. D.; Turekian, K. K., Eds.; Elsevier: Oxford, 2014; pp 291 336.
  49. 49
    Rosenwasser, S.; Graff van Creveld, S.; Schatz, D.; Malitsky, S.; Tzfadia, O.; Aharoni, A.; Levin, Y.; Gabashvili, A.; Feldmesser, E.; Vardi, A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2014, 111, 2740 2745 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1319773111
  50. 50
    Dooley, C. T.; Dore, T. M.; Hanson, G. T.; Jackson, W. C.; Remington, S. J.; Tsien, R. Y. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 22284 22293 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M312847200
  51. 51
    Hanson, G. T.; Aggeler, R.; Oglesbee, D.; Cannon, M.; Capaldi, R. A.; Tsien, R. Y.; Remington, S. J. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 13044 13053 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M312846200
  52. 52
    Bligh, E. G.; Dyer, W. J. Can. J. Biochem. Physiol. 1959, 37, 911 917 DOI: 10.1139/o59-099
  53. 53
    Hummel, J.; Segu, S.; Li, Y.; Irgang, S.; Jueppner, J.; Giavalisco, P. Front. Plant Sci. 2011, 2, 54 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2011.00054
  54. 54
    Libiseller, G.; Dvorzak, M.; Kleb, U.; Gander, E.; Eisenberg, T.; Madeo, F.; Neumann, S.; Trausinger, G.; Sinner, F.; Pieber, T.; Magnes, C. BMC Bioinf. 2015, 16, 118 DOI: 10.1186/s12859-015-0562-8
  55. 55
    Van Mooy, B. A. S.; Fredricks, H. F. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2010, 74, 6499 6516 DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2010.08.026
  56. 56
    Cajka, T.; Fiehn, O. Anal. Chem. 2016, 88, 524 545 DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.5b04491
  57. 57
    Melamud, E.; Vastag, L.; Rabinowitz, J. D. Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 9818 9826 DOI: 10.1021/ac1021166
  58. 58
    Abida, H.; Dolch, L. J.; Mei, C.; Villanova, V.; Conte, M.; Block, M. A.; Finazzi, G.; Bastien, O.; Tirichine, L.; Bowler, C.; Rebeille, F.; Petroutsos, D.; Jouhet, J.; Marechal, E. Plant Physiol. 2015, 167, 118 136 DOI: 10.1104/pp.114.252395
  59. 59
    Levitan, O.; Dinamarca, J.; Zelzion, E.; Lun, D. S.; Guerra, L. T.; Kim, M. K.; Kim, J.; Van Mooy, B. A. S.; Bhattacharya, D.; Falkowski, P. G. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2015, 112, 412 417 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1419818112
  60. 60
    Clarke, K. R.; Somerfield, P. J.; Gorley, R. N. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 2008, 366, 56 69 DOI: 10.1016/j.jembe.2008.07.009
  61. 61
    d’Ippolito, G.; Tucci, S.; Cutignano, A.; Romano, G.; Cimino, G.; Miralto, A.; Fontana, A. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids 2004, 1686, 100 107 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2004.09.002
  62. 62
    Mene-Saffrane, L.; Dubugnon, L.; Chetelat, A.; Stolz, S.; Gouhier-Darimont, C.; Farmer, E. E. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 1702 1708 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M807114200
  63. 63
    Goncalves, E. C.; Wilkie, A. C.; Kirst, M.; Rathinasabapathi, B. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2015,  DOI: 10.1111/pbi.12523
  64. 64
    Merchant, S. S.; Kropat, J.; Liu, B.; Shaw, J.; Warakanont, J. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2012, 23, 352 363 DOI: 10.1016/j.copbio.2011.12.001
  65. 65
    Hunter, J. E.; Frada, M. J.; Fredricks, H. F.; Vardi, A.; Van Mooy, B. A. S. Front. Mar. Sci. 2015, 2, 81 DOI: 10.3389/fmars.2015.00081
  66. 66
    Sumner, L.; Amberg, A.; Barrett, D.; Beale, M.; Beger, R.; Daykin, C. Metabolomics 2007, 3, 211 221 DOI: 10.1007/s11306-007-0082-2
  67. 67
    Senger, T.; Wichard, T.; Kunze, S.; Gobel, C.; Lerchl, J.; Pohnert, G.; Feussner, I. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 7588 7596 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M411738200

Cited By

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

This article is cited by 52 publications.

  1. Tito Damiani, Stefano Bonciarelli, Gerhard G. Thallinger, Nikolai Koehler, Christoph A. Krettler, Arif K. Salihoğlu, Ansgar Korf, Josch K. Pauling, Tomáš Pluskal, Zhixu Ni, Laura Goracci. Software and Computational Tools for LC-MS-Based Epilipidomics: Challenges and Solutions. Analytical Chemistry 2023, 95 (1) , 287-303. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.2c04406
  2. Jonathan E. Hunter, Helen F. Fredricks, Lars Behrendt, Uria Alcolombri, Shavonna M. Bent, Roman Stocker, Benjamin A. S. Van Mooy. Using High-Sensitivity Lipidomics To Assess Microscale Heterogeneity in Oceanic Sinking Particles and Single Phytoplankton Cells. Environmental Science & Technology 2021, 55 (22) , 15456-15465. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c02836
  3. Zongyuan Wu, Bangfu Wu, Xin Lv, Ya Xie, Shuling Xu, Congcong Ma, Jiqu Xu, Xinghao Tu, Fang Wei, Hong Chen. Serumal Lipidomics Reveals the Anti-inflammatory Effect of Flax Lignans and Sinapic Acid in High-Fat-Diet-Fed Mice. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 2021, 69 (32) , 9111-9123. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.0c07291
  4. Ahmed Mohamed, Jeffrey Molendijk, Michelle M. Hill. lipidr: A Software Tool for Data Mining and Analysis of Lipidomics Datasets. Journal of Proteome Research 2020, 19 (7) , 2890-2897. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jproteome.0c00082
  5. Michael D. M. Dryden, Ryan Fobel, Christian Fobel, and Aaron R. Wheeler . Upon the Shoulders of Giants: Open-Source Hardware and Software in Analytical Chemistry. Analytical Chemistry 2017, 89 (8) , 4330-4338. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.7b00485
  6. Kaitlin R. Rempfert, Emily A. Kraus, Daniel B. Nothaft, Nadia Dildar, John R. Spear, Julio Sepúlveda, Alexis S. Templeton. Intact polar lipidome and membrane adaptations of microbial communities inhabiting serpentinite-hosted fluids. Frontiers in Microbiology 2023, 14 https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1198786
  7. Bethanie R. Edwards. Lipid Biogeochemistry and Modern Lipidomic Techniques. Annual Review of Marine Science 2023, 15 (1) , 485-508. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-marine-040422-094104
  8. Su Ding, Jan V. Henkel, Ellen C. Hopmans, Nicole J. Bale, Michel Koenen, Laura Villanueva, Jaap S. Sinninghe Damsté. Changes in the membrane lipid composition of a Sulfurimonas species depend on the electron acceptor used for sulfur oxidation. ISME Communications 2022, 2 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s43705-022-00207-3
  9. Nils Hoffmann, Gerhard Mayer, Canan Has, Dominik Kopczynski, Fadi Al Machot, Dominik Schwudke, Robert Ahrends, Katrin Marcus, Martin Eisenacher, Michael Turewicz. A Current Encyclopedia of Bioinformatics Tools, Data Formats and Resources for Mass Spectrometry Lipidomics. Metabolites 2022, 12 (7) , 584. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo12070584
  10. Henry C. Holm, Helen F. Fredricks, Shavonna M. Bent, Daniel P. Lowenstein, Justin E. Ossolinski, Kevin W. Becker, Winifred M. Johnson, Kharis Schrage, Benjamin A. S. Van Mooy. Global ocean lipidomes show a universal relationship between temperature and lipid unsaturation. Science 2022, 376 (6600) , 1487-1491. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abn7455
  11. Julio Sepúlveda, Sebastian I. Cantarero. Phytoplankton response to a warming ocean. Science 2022, 376 (6600) , 1378-1379. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abo5235
  12. Daniel Muratore, Angela K. Boysen, Matthew J. Harke, Kevin W. Becker, John R. Casey, Sacha N. Coesel, Daniel R. Mende, Samuel T. Wilson, Frank O. Aylward, John M. Eppley, Alice Vislova, Shengyun Peng, Rogelio A. Rodriguez-Gonzalez, Stephen J. Beckett, E. Virginia Armbrust, Edward F. DeLong, David M. Karl, Angelicque E. White, Jonathan P. Zehr, Benjamin A. S. Van Mooy, Sonya T. Dyhrman, Anitra E. Ingalls, Joshua S. Weitz. Complex marine microbial communities partition metabolism of scarce resources over the diel cycle. Nature Ecology & Evolution 2022, 6 (2) , 218-229. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-021-01606-w
  13. Steven J. Biller, Rachel A. Lundeen, Laura R. Hmelo, Kevin W. Becker, Aldo A. Arellano, Keven Dooley, Katherine R. Heal, Laura T. Carlson, Benjamin A. S. Van Mooy, Anitra E. Ingalls, Sallie W. Chisholm. Prochlorococcus extracellular vesicles: molecular composition and adsorption to diverse microbes. Environmental Microbiology 2022, 24 (1) , 420-435. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.15834
  14. Valeria Sabatino, Ida Orefice, Pina Marotta, Luca Ambrosino, Maria Luisa Chiusano, Giuliana d'Ippolito, Giovanna Romano, Angelo Fontana, Maria Immacolata Ferrante. Silencing of a Pseudo‐nitzschia arenysensis lipoxygenase transcript leads to reduced oxylipin production and impaired growth. New Phytologist 2022, 233 (2) , 809-822. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.17739
  15. Ben P. Diaz, Ben Knowles, Christopher T. Johns, Christien P. Laber, Karen Grace V. Bondoc, Liti Haramaty, Frank Natale, Elizabeth L. Harvey, Sasha J. Kramer, Luis M. Bolaños, Daniel P. Lowenstein, Helen F. Fredricks, Jason Graff, Toby K. Westberry, Kristina D. A. Mojica, Nils Haëntjens, Nicholas Baetge, Peter Gaube, Emmanuel Boss, Craig A. Carlson, Michael J. Behrenfeld, Benjamin A. S. Van Mooy, Kay D. Bidle. Seasonal mixed layer depth shapes phytoplankton physiology, viral production, and accumulation in the North Atlantic. Nature Communications 2021, 12 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26836-1
  16. Daniel P. Lowenstein, Kyle Mayers, Helen F. Fredricks, Benjamin A.S. Van Mooy. Targeted and untargeted lipidomic analysis of haptophyte cultures reveals novel and divergent nutrient-stress adaptations. Organic Geochemistry 2021, 161 , 104315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2021.104315
  17. Felix J. Elling, Jordon D. Hemingway, Jenan J. Kharbush, Kevin W. Becker, Catherine A. Polik, Ann Pearson. Linking diatom-diazotroph symbioses to nitrogen cycle perturbations and deep-water anoxia: Insights from Mediterranean sapropel events. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 2021, 571 , 117110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2021.117110
  18. Alma Villaseñor, Joanna Godzien, Tomás Clive Barker-Tejeda, Carolina Gonzalez-Riano, Ángeles López-López, Danuta Dudzik, Ana Gradillas, Coral Barbas. Analytical approaches for studying oxygenated lipids in the search of potential biomarkers by LC-MS. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry 2021, 143 , 116367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2021.116367
  19. Francesca Latino, Stefania Cataldi, Roberto Carvutto, Michele De Candia, Francesca D'Elia, Antonino Patti, Valerio Bonavolontà, Francesco Fischetti. The Importance of Lipidomic Approach for Mapping and Exploring the Molecular Networks Underlying Physical Exercise: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2021, 22 (16) , 8734. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22168734
  20. Nicole J. Bale, Su Ding, Ellen C. Hopmans, Milou G. I. Arts, Laura Villanueva, Christine Boschman, Andreas F. Haas, Stefan Schouten, Jaap S. Sinninghe Damsté. Lipidomics of Environmental Microbial Communities. I: Visualization of Component Distributions Using Untargeted Analysis of High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry Data. Frontiers in Microbiology 2021, 12 https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.659302
  21. Su Ding, Nicole J. Bale, Ellen C. Hopmans, Laura Villanueva, Milou G. I. Arts, Stefan Schouten, Jaap S. Sinninghe Damsté. Lipidomics of Environmental Microbial Communities. II: Characterization Using Molecular Networking and Information Theory. Frontiers in Microbiology 2021, 12 https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.659315
  22. Zi-Qi Shi, Lu-Yi Wang, Jia-Yi Zheng, Gui-Zhong Xin, Lin Chen. Lipidomics characterization of the mechanism of Cynomorium songaricum polysaccharide on treating type 2 diabetes. Journal of Chromatography B 2021, 1176 , 122737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2021.122737
  23. Jérémy Marchand, Yann Guitton, Estelle Martineau, Anne-Lise Royer, David Balgoma, Bruno Le Bizec, Patrick Giraudeau, Gaud Dervilly. Extending the Lipidome Coverage by Combining Different Mass Spectrometric Platforms: An Innovative Strategy to Answer Chemical Food Safety Issues. Foods 2021, 10 (6) , 1218. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10061218
  24. Jeff S. Bowman, Benjamin A. S. Van Mooy, Daniel P. Lowenstein, Helen F. Fredricks, Colleen M. Hansel, Rebecca Gast, James R. Collins, Nicole Couto, Hugh W. Ducklow. Whole Community Metatranscriptomes and Lipidomes Reveal Diverse Responses Among Antarctic Phytoplankton to Changing Ice Conditions. Frontiers in Marine Science 2021, 8 https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2021.593566
  25. Kevin W. Becker, Matthew J. Harke, Daniel R. Mende, Daniel Muratore, Joshua S. Weitz, Edward F. DeLong, Sonya T. Dyhrman, Benjamin A. S. Van Mooy. Combined pigment and metatranscriptomic analysis reveals highly synchronized diel patterns of phenotypic light response across domains in the open oligotrophic ocean. The ISME Journal 2021, 15 (2) , 520-533. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-020-00793-x
  26. Andrew D. Steen, Stephanie Kusch, Hussain A. Abdulla, Nevenka Cakić, Sarah Coffinet, Thorsten Dittmar, James M. Fulton, Valier Galy, Kai-Uwe Hinrichs, Anitra E. Ingalls, Boris P. Koch, Elizabeth Kujawinski, Zhanfei Liu, Helena Osterholz, Darci Rush, Michael Seidel, Julio Sepúlveda, Stuart G. Wakeham. Analytical and Computational Advances, Opportunities, and Challenges in Marine Organic Biogeochemistry in an Era of “Omics”. Frontiers in Marine Science 2020, 7 https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.00718
  27. Zhuo Zhu, Mingkun Yang, Youhuang Bai, Feng Ge, Shihua Wang. Antioxidant‐related catalase CTA1 regulates development, aflatoxin biosynthesis, and virulence in pathogenic fungus Aspergillus flavus. Environmental Microbiology 2020, 22 (7) , 2792-2810. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.15011
  28. Jeremy P. Koelmel, Michael P. Napolitano, Candice Z. Ulmer, Vasilis Vasiliou, Timothy J. Garrett, Richard A. Yost, M. N. V. Prasad, Krystal J. Godri Pollitt, John A. Bowden. Environmental lipidomics: understanding the response of organisms and ecosystems to a changing world. Metabolomics 2020, 16 (5) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11306-020-01665-3
  29. Carolyn A. Miller, Henry C. Holm, Lara Horstmann, John C. George, Helen F. Fredricks, Benjamin A. S. Van Mooy, Amy Apprill. Coordinated transformation of the gut microbiome and lipidome of bowhead whales provides novel insights into digestion. The ISME Journal 2020, 14 (3) , 688-701. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-019-0549-y
  30. Antoine Jaussaud, Josselin Lupette, Juliette Salvaing, Juliette Jouhet, Olivier Bastien, Marina Gromova, Eric Maréchal. Stepwise Biogenesis of Subpopulations of Lipid Droplets in Nitrogen Starved Phaeodactylum tricornutum Cells. Frontiers in Plant Science 2020, 11 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.00048
  31. Matthew D. Johnson, Bethanie R. Edwards, David J. Beaudoin, Benjamin A. S. Van Mooy, Assaf Vardi. Nitric oxide mediates oxylipin production and grazing defense in diatoms. Environmental Microbiology 2020, 22 (2) , 629-645. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.14879
  32. Janine Wiebach, Manuela Nagel, Andreas Börner, Thomas Altmann, David Riewe. Age‐dependent loss of seed viability is associated with increased lipid oxidation and hydrolysis. Plant, Cell & Environment 2020, 43 (2) , 303-314. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.13651
  33. Ivan Liakh, Alicja Pakiet, Tomasz Sledzinski, Adriana Mika. Methods of the Analysis of Oxylipins in Biological Samples. Molecules 2020, 25 (2) , 349. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25020349
  34. Zhixu Ni, Laura Goracci, Gabriele Cruciani, Maria Fedorova. Computational solutions in redox lipidomics – Current strategies and future perspectives. Free Radical Biology and Medicine 2019, 144 , 110-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2019.04.027
  35. Luxiao Li, Shanshan Zhong, Xia Shen, Qiujing Li, Wenxin Xu, Yongzhen Tao, Huiyong Yin. Recent development on liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis of oxidized lipids. Free Radical Biology and Medicine 2019, 144 , 16-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2019.06.006
  36. Jan Stanstrup, Corey Broeckling, Rick Helmus, Nils Hoffmann, Ewy Mathé, Thomas Naake, Luca Nicolotti, Kristian Peters, Johannes Rainer, Reza Salek, Tobias Schulze, Emma Schymanski, Michael Stravs, Etienne Thévenot, Hendrik Treutler, Ralf Weber, Egon Willighagen, Michael Witting, Steffen Neumann. The metaRbolomics Toolbox in Bioconductor and beyond. Metabolites 2019, 9 (10) , 200. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo9100200
  37. Kai P. Law, Chuanlun L. Zhang. Current progress and future trends in mass spectrometry-based archaeal lipidomics. Organic Geochemistry 2019, 134 , 45-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2019.04.001
  38. Yulia Y. Tyurina, Vladimir A. Tyurin, Tamil Anthonymuthu, Andrew A. Amoscato, Louis J. Sparvero, Anastasiia M. Nesterova, Matthew L. Baynard, Wanyang Sun, RongRong He, Philipp Khaitovich, Yuri A. Vladimirov, Dmitry I. Gabrilovich, Hülya Bayır, Valerian E. Kagan. “Redox lipidomics technology: Looking for a needle in a haystack”. Chemistry and Physics of Lipids 2019, 221 , 93-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemphyslip.2019.03.012
  39. Josselin Lupette, Antoine Jaussaud, Khawla Seddiki, Christian Morabito, Sabine Brugière, Hubert Schaller, Marcel Kuntz, Jean-Luc Putaux, Pierre-Henri Jouneau, Fabrice Rébeillé, Denis Falconet, Yohann Couté, Juliette Jouhet, Marianne Tardif, Juliette Salvaing, Eric Maréchal. The architecture of lipid droplets in the diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum. Algal Research 2019, 38 , 101415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2019.101415
  40. Kevin W. Becker, James R. Collins, Bryndan P. Durham, Ryan D. Groussman, Angelicque E. White, Helen F. Fredricks, Justin E. Ossolinski, Daniel J. Repeta, Paul Carini, E. Virginia Armbrust, Benjamin A. S. Van Mooy. Daily changes in phytoplankton lipidomes reveal mechanisms of energy storage in the open ocean. Nature Communications 2018, 9 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07346-z
  41. Remington X. Poulin, Scott Hogan, Kelsey L. Poulson-Ellestad, Emily Brown, Facundo M. Fernández, Julia Kubanek. Karenia brevis allelopathy compromises the lipidome, membrane integrity, and photosynthesis of competitors. Scientific Reports 2018, 8 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-27845-9
  42. Florian Götz, Krista Longnecker, Melissa C. Kido Soule, Kevin W. Becker, Jesse McNichol, Elizabeth B. Kujawinski, Stefan M. Sievert. Targeted metabolomics reveals proline as a major osmolyte in the chemolithoautotroph Sulfurimonas denitrificans. MicrobiologyOpen 2018, 7 (4) https://doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.586
  43. James R. Collins, Helen F. Fredricks, Jeff S. Bowman, Collin P. Ward, Carly Moreno, Krista Longnecker, Adrian Marchetti, Colleen M. Hansel, Hugh W. Ducklow, Benjamin A.S. Van Mooy. The molecular products and biogeochemical significance of lipid photooxidation in West Antarctic surface waters. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 2018, 232 , 244-264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2018.04.030
  44. Paul D. Hutchins, Jason D. Russell, Joshua J. Coon. LipiDex: An Integrated Software Package for High-Confidence Lipid Identification. Cell Systems 2018, 6 (5) , 621-625.e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cels.2018.03.011
  45. D. Brankovits, J. W. Pohlman, H. Niemann, M. B. Leigh, M. C. Leewis, K. W. Becker, T. M. Iliffe, F. Alvarez, M. F. Lehmann, B. Phillips. Methane- and dissolved organic carbon-fueled microbial loop supports a tropical subterranean estuary ecosystem. Nature Communications 2017, 8 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-01776-x
  46. Jeremy P. Koelmel, Nicholas M. Kroeger, Candice Z. Ulmer, John A. Bowden, Rainey E. Patterson, Jason A. Cochran, Christopher W. W. Beecher, Timothy J. Garrett, Richard A. Yost. LipidMatch: an automated workflow for rule-based lipid identification using untargeted high-resolution tandem mass spectrometry data. BMC Bioinformatics 2017, 18 (1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-017-1744-3
  47. Andrea J. Fassbender, Hilary I. Palevsky, Todd R. Martz, Anitra E. Ingalls, Martha Gledhill, Sarah E. Fawcett, Jay A. Brandes, Lihini I. Aluwihare. Perspectives on Chemical Oceanography in the 21st century: Participants of the COME ABOARD Meeting examine aspects of the field in the context of 40 years of DISCO. Marine Chemistry 2017, 196 , 181-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2017.09.002
  48. Biswapriya B. Misra, Johannes F. Fahrmann, Dmitry Grapov. Review of emerging metabolomic tools and resources: 2015–2016. ELECTROPHORESIS 2017, 38 (18) , 2257-2274. https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.201700110
  49. Dipasmita Pal-Nath, Shoshana Didi-Cohen, Nastassia Shtaida, Pulak Ranjan Nath, Talya Samani, Sammy Boussiba, Inna Khozin-Goldberg. Improved productivity and oxidative stress tolerance under nitrogen starvation is associated with the ablated Δ5 desaturation in the green microalga Lobosphaera incisa. Algal Research 2017, 26 , 25-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2017.06.026
  50. Hiroshi Tsugawa, Kazutaka Ikeda, Makoto Arita. The importance of bioinformatics for connecting data-driven lipidomics and biological insights. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular and Cell Biology of Lipids 2017, 1862 (8) , 762-765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbalip.2017.05.006
  51. Leonardo Perez de Souza, Thomas Naake, Takayuki Tohge, Alisdair R Fernie. From chromatogram to analyte to metabolite. How to pick horses for courses from the massive web resources for mass spectral plant metabolomics. GigaScience 2017, 6 (7) https://doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/gix037
  52. Susanne B. Breitkopf, Stéphane J. H. Ricoult, Min Yuan, Ying Xu, David A. Peake, Brendan D. Manning, John M. Asara. A relative quantitative positive/negative ion switching method for untargeted lipidomics via high resolution LC-MS/MS from any biological source. Metabolomics 2017, 13 (3) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11306-016-1157-8
  • Abstract

    Scheme 1

    Scheme 1. Preparation, Screening, and Annotation of HPLC-MS Lipid Data Using LOBSTAHSi

    Scheme aWe automate several functions of the ProteoWizard msConvert tool. (43)

    Scheme b,cxcms (36-38) was chosen for its command-line features and because it permits follow-on use of the R package CAMERA (39) to identify isotopes.

    Scheme dIPO (54) can be used to optimize the values of parameters for some xcms and CAMERA functions.

    Scheme eMultiple assignments will likely exist for many peakgroups in a typical data set.

    Scheme fThis criterion may be useful when the subject data set contains lipids of exclusively eukaryotic origin.

    Scheme gIn the case of C2a, the adduct ion hierarchy for the parent compound is completely satisfied; i.e., the pseudospectrum contains peakgroups representing every adduct ion of the compound of greater theoretical abundance than the least abundant adduct ion present. In the case of C2b, the adduct ion of greatest theoretical abundance and some lesser adduct ion is present, but adduct ions of intermediate abundance are not observed.

    Scheme hBoth outcomes may apply simultaneously at this decision point if the data set contains isobars and isomers of the assignment.

    Scheme iAnnotation codes (in bold) may be applied as indicated; these are designed to assist the user in evaluating assignment confidence during subsequent data analysis.

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. (a) All IPL, ox-IPL, and TAG identified in the P. tricornutum data set with high confidence (N = 1039; figure excludes pigments). (b) Distribution by lipid class of high-confidence assignments made in the 0 and 150 μM H2O2 treatments at 24 h (N = 894 and N = 848, respectively). Ellipse size in (b) reflects the number of compounds identified within each class and treatment. The assignments presented in (a) and (b) fully satisfied the LOBSTAHS adduct hierarchy screening criteria (i.e., annotated “C1” or “C2a” according to the logic in Scheme 1) and had no competing assignments, such as possible structural isomers, identified in the data set. Excluded are those compounds having an odd total number of acyl carbon atoms. aGeneral direction of movement within m/z versus RT plot, for a given lipid class and oxidation state. The direction of movement that results from addition or removal of additional oxygen atom(s) varies by lipid class. bNot to scale.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. Remodeling of the Phaeodactylum tricornutum lipidome after 24 h, as visualized from data analyzed with LOBSTAHS. (a) Heatmap showing relative abundances across two treatments (0 and 150 μM H2O2) of all IPL, ox-IPL, and TAG identified with high confidence. Each row (N = 896) represents a different compound identified from the database; Figure S11 contains an expanded version of the plot that includes labels for each individual compound. (b) Heatmap detail, showing changes in the most abundant (N = 40) moieties of monogalactosyldiacylglycerol (MGDG), a lipid typically localized to the chloroplast. (c) Fraction of total peak area identified as triacylglycerol (TAG) at three time points during the experiment. Error bars are ± SD of two replicates. In (a) and (b), shading shows the relative abundance of each compound as a fold difference of the mean peak area observed in that treatment from the mean peak area of the compound observed across all treatments. Dendrogram clustering and group definitions were determined by similarity profile analysis. (60) The numbers and identities of the components assigned to each group in (a) are given in Table S5 and Figure S11. Solid black lines in the dendrogram indicate branching that was statistically significant (P ≤ 0.01).

  • References

    ARTICLE SECTIONS
    Jump To

    This article references 67 other publications.

    1. 1
      Apel, K.; Hirt, H. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2004, 55, 373 399 DOI: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.55.031903.141701
    2. 2
      Crastes de Paulet, A.; Douste-Blazy, L.; Paoletti, R. Free Radicals, Lipoproteins, and Membrane Lipids; Plenum Publishing Corporation: New York, 1988.
    3. 3
      Lesser, M. P. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 2006, 68, 253 278 DOI: 10.1146/annurev.physiol.68.040104.110001
    4. 4
      Strassburg, K.; Huijbrechts, A. M.; Kortekaas, K. A.; Lindeman, J. H.; Pedersen, T. L.; Dane, A.; Berger, R.; Brenkman, A.; Hankemeier, T.; van Duynhoven, J.; Kalkhoven, E.; Newman, J. W.; Vreeken, R. J. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2012, 404, 1413 1426 DOI: 10.1007/s00216-012-6226-x
    5. 5
      Kuhn, H.; Borngraber, S. In Lipoxygenases and Their Metabolites; Nigam, S.; Pace-Asciak, C. R., Eds.; Kluwer Academic: New York, 1999; pp 5 28.
    6. 6
      Wenk, M. R. Cell 2010, 143, 888 895 DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.11.033
    7. 7
      Buseman, C. M.; Tamura, P.; Sparks, A. A.; Baughman, E. J.; Maatta, S.; Zhao, J.; Roth, M. R.; Esch, S. W.; Shah, J.; Williams, T. D.; Welti, R. Plant Physiol. 2006, 142, 28 39 DOI: 10.1104/pp.106.082115
    8. 8
      Vu, H. S.; Tamura, P.; Galeva, N. A.; Chaturvedi, R.; Roth, M. R.; Williams, T. D.; Wang, X.; Shah, J.; Welti, R. Plant Physiol. 2012, 158, 324 339 DOI: 10.1104/pp.111.190280
    9. 9
      Andreou, A.; Brodhun, F.; Feussner, I. Prog. Lipid Res. 2009, 48, 148 170 DOI: 10.1016/j.plipres.2009.02.002
    10. 10
      Thomas, A.; Patterson, N. H.; Marcinkiewicz, M. M.; Lazaris, A.; Metrakos, P.; Chaurand, P. Anal. Chem. 2013, 85, 2860 2866 DOI: 10.1021/ac3034294
    11. 11
      Haller, E.; Stübiger, G.; Lafitte, D.; Lindner, W.; Lämmerhofer, M. Anal. Chem. 2014, 86, 9954 9961 DOI: 10.1021/ac502855n
    12. 12
      Carini, P.; Van Mooy, B. A. S.; Thrash, J. C.; White, A.; Zhao, Y.; Campbell, E. O.; Fredricks, H. F.; Giovannoni, S. J. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2015, 112, 7767 7772 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1505034112
    13. 13
      Van Mooy, B. A. S.; Fredricks, H. F.; Pedler, B. E.; Dyhrman, S. T.; Karl, D. M.; Koblizek, M.; Lomas, M. W.; Mincer, T. J.; Moore, L. R.; Moutin, T.; Rappe, M. S.; Webb, E. A. Nature 2009, 458, 69 72 DOI: 10.1038/nature07659
    14. 14
      Fulton, J. M.; Fredricks, H. F.; Bidle, K. D.; Vardi, A.; Kendrick, B. J.; DiTullio, G. R.; Van Mooy, B. A. S. Environ. Microbiol. 2014, 16, 1137 1149 DOI: 10.1111/1462-2920.12358
    15. 15
      Vardi, A.; Van Mooy, B. A. S.; Fredricks, H. F.; Popendorf, K. J.; Ossolinski, J. E.; Haramaty, L.; Bidle, K. D. Science 2009, 326, 861 865 DOI: 10.1126/science.1177322
    16. 16
      Ianora, A.; Miralto, A. Ecotoxicology 2010, 19, 493 511 DOI: 10.1007/s10646-009-0434-y
    17. 17
      Vardi, A. Commun. Integr. Biol. 2008, 1, 134 136 DOI: 10.4161/cib.1.2.6867
    18. 18
      Pohnert, G. In Algal Chemical Ecology; Amsler, C. D., Ed.; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 2008; pp 195 202.
    19. 19
      Casotti, R.; Mazza, S.; Brunet, C.; Vantrepotte, V.; Ianora, A.; Miralto, A. J. Phycol. 2005, 41, 7 20 DOI: 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2005.04052.x
    20. 20
      Miralto, A.; Barone, G.; Romano, G.; Poulet, S. A.; Ianora, A.; Russo, G. L.; Buttino, I.; Mazzarella, G.; Laabir, M.; Cabrini, M.; Giacobbe, M. G. Nature 1999, 402, 173 176 DOI: 10.1038/46023
    21. 21
      Balestra, C.; Alonso-Saez, L.; Gasol, J. M.; Casotti, R. Aquat. Microb. Ecol. 2011, 63, 123 131 DOI: 10.3354/ame01486
    22. 22
      Ribalet, F.; Intertaglia, L.; Lebaron, P.; Casotti, R. Aquat. Toxicol. 2008, 86, 249 255 DOI: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2007.11.005
    23. 23
      Edwards, B. R.; Bidle, K. D.; Van Mooy, B. A. S. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2015, 112, 5909 5914 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1422664112
    24. 24
      Brügger, B. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2014, 83, 79 98 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-060713-035324
    25. 25
      Holčapek, M. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2015, 407, 4971 4972 DOI: 10.1007/s00216-015-8740-0
    26. 26
      Andreou, A.; Feussner, I. Phytochemistry 2009, 70, 1504 1510 DOI: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2009.05.008
    27. 27
      Lamari, N.; Ruggiero, M. V.; d’Ippolito, G.; Kooistra, W. H. C. F.; Fontana, A.; Montresor, M. PLoS One 2013, 8, e73281 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073281
    28. 28
      Girotti, A. W. J. Lipid Res. 1998, 39, 1529 1542
    29. 29
      Triantaphylides, C.; Krischke, M.; Hoeberichts, F. A.; Ksas, B.; Gresser, G.; Havaux, M.; Van Breusegem, F.; Mueller, M. J. Plant Physiol. 2008, 148, 960 968 DOI: 10.1104/pp.108.125690
    30. 30
      Sparvero, L. J.; Amoscato, A. A.; Kochanek, P. M.; Pitt, B. R.; Kagan, V. E.; Bayır, H. J. Neurochem. 2010, 115, 1322 1336 DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2010.07055.x
    31. 31
      Spickett, C. M.; Pitt, A. R. Antioxid. Redox Signaling 2015, 22, 1646 1666 DOI: 10.1089/ars.2014.6098
    32. 32
      Balvers, M. G.; Verhoeckx, K. C.; Bijlsma, S.; Rubingh, C. M.; Meijerink, J.; Wortelboer, H. M.; Witkamp, R. F. Metabolomics 2012, 8, 1130 1147 DOI: 10.1007/s11306-012-0421-9
    33. 33
      Bruins, M. J.; Dane, A. D.; Strassburg, K.; Vreeken, R. J.; Newman, J. W.; Salem, N., Jr.; Tyburczy, C.; Brenna, J. T. J. Lipid Res. 2013, 54, 1598 1607 DOI: 10.1194/jlr.M034918
    34. 34
      Ni, Z.; Milic, I.; Fedorova, M. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2015, 407, 5161 5173 DOI: 10.1007/s00216-015-8536-2
    35. 35
      R Core Team. R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2015.
    36. 36
      Smith, C. A.; Want, E. J.; O’Maille, G.; Abagyan, R.; Siuzdak, G. Anal. Chem. 2006, 78, 779 787 DOI: 10.1021/ac051437y
    37. 37
      Tautenhahn, R.; Boettcher, C.; Neumann, S. BMC Bioinf. 2008, 9, 504 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-9-504
    38. 38
      Benton, H. P.; Want, E. J.; Ebbels, T. M. D. Bioinformatics 2010, 26, 2488 2489 DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq441
    39. 39
      Kuhl, C.; Tautenhahn, R.; Bottcher, C.; Larson, T. R.; Neumann, S. Anal. Chem. 2012, 84, 283 289 DOI: 10.1021/ac202450g
    40. 40
      van Creveld, S. G.; Rosenwasser, S.; Schatz, D.; Koren, I.; Vardi, A. ISME J. 2015, 9, 385 395 DOI: 10.1038/ismej.2014.136
    41. 41
      Husen, P.; Tarasov, K.; Katafiasz, M.; Sokol, E.; Vogt, J.; Baumgart, J.; Nitsch, R.; Ekroos, K.; Ejsing, C. S. PLoS One 2013, 8, e79736 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079736
    42. 42
      Popendorf, K. J.; Fredricks, H. F.; Van Mooy, B. A. S. Lipids 2013, 48, 185 195 DOI: 10.1007/s11745-012-3748-0
    43. 43
      Kessner, D.; Chambers, M.; Burke, R.; Agus, D.; Mallick, P. Bioinformatics 2008, 24, 2534 2536 DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn323
    44. 44
      Kind, T.; Fiehn, O. BMC Bioinf. 2006, 7, 234 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-7-234
    45. 45
      Ejsing, C. S.; Duchoslav, E.; Sampaio, J.; Simons, K.; Bonner, R.; Thiele, C.; Ekroos, K.; Shevchenko, A. Anal. Chem. 2006, 78, 6202 6214 DOI: 10.1021/ac060545x
    46. 46
      Layre, E.; Sweet, L.; Hong, S.; Madigan, C. A.; Desjardins, D.; Young, D. C.; Cheng, T. Y.; Annand, J. W.; Kim, K.; Shamputa, I. C.; McConnell, M. J.; Debono, C. A.; Behar, S. M.; Minnaard, A. J.; Murray, M.; Barry, C. E., 3rd; Matsunaga, I.; Moody, D. B. Chem. Biol. 2011, 18, 1537 1549 DOI: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2011.10.013
    47. 47
      Clasquin, M. F.; Melamud, E.; Rabinowitz, J. D. Curr. Protoc Bioinformatics 2012, 37, 14.11.1 14.11.23 DOI: 10.1002/0471250953.bi1411s37
    48. 48
      Pearson, A. In Treatise on Geochemistry; Holland, H. D.; Turekian, K. K., Eds.; Elsevier: Oxford, 2014; pp 291 336.
    49. 49
      Rosenwasser, S.; Graff van Creveld, S.; Schatz, D.; Malitsky, S.; Tzfadia, O.; Aharoni, A.; Levin, Y.; Gabashvili, A.; Feldmesser, E.; Vardi, A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2014, 111, 2740 2745 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1319773111
    50. 50
      Dooley, C. T.; Dore, T. M.; Hanson, G. T.; Jackson, W. C.; Remington, S. J.; Tsien, R. Y. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 22284 22293 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M312847200
    51. 51
      Hanson, G. T.; Aggeler, R.; Oglesbee, D.; Cannon, M.; Capaldi, R. A.; Tsien, R. Y.; Remington, S. J. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 13044 13053 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M312846200
    52. 52
      Bligh, E. G.; Dyer, W. J. Can. J. Biochem. Physiol. 1959, 37, 911 917 DOI: 10.1139/o59-099
    53. 53
      Hummel, J.; Segu, S.; Li, Y.; Irgang, S.; Jueppner, J.; Giavalisco, P. Front. Plant Sci. 2011, 2, 54 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2011.00054
    54. 54
      Libiseller, G.; Dvorzak, M.; Kleb, U.; Gander, E.; Eisenberg, T.; Madeo, F.; Neumann, S.; Trausinger, G.; Sinner, F.; Pieber, T.; Magnes, C. BMC Bioinf. 2015, 16, 118 DOI: 10.1186/s12859-015-0562-8
    55. 55
      Van Mooy, B. A. S.; Fredricks, H. F. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2010, 74, 6499 6516 DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2010.08.026
    56. 56
      Cajka, T.; Fiehn, O. Anal. Chem. 2016, 88, 524 545 DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.5b04491
    57. 57
      Melamud, E.; Vastag, L.; Rabinowitz, J. D. Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 9818 9826 DOI: 10.1021/ac1021166
    58. 58
      Abida, H.; Dolch, L. J.; Mei, C.; Villanova, V.; Conte, M.; Block, M. A.; Finazzi, G.; Bastien, O.; Tirichine, L.; Bowler, C.; Rebeille, F.; Petroutsos, D.; Jouhet, J.; Marechal, E. Plant Physiol. 2015, 167, 118 136 DOI: 10.1104/pp.114.252395
    59. 59
      Levitan, O.; Dinamarca, J.; Zelzion, E.; Lun, D. S.; Guerra, L. T.; Kim, M. K.; Kim, J.; Van Mooy, B. A. S.; Bhattacharya, D.; Falkowski, P. G. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2015, 112, 412 417 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1419818112
    60. 60
      Clarke, K. R.; Somerfield, P. J.; Gorley, R. N. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 2008, 366, 56 69 DOI: 10.1016/j.jembe.2008.07.009
    61. 61
      d’Ippolito, G.; Tucci, S.; Cutignano, A.; Romano, G.; Cimino, G.; Miralto, A.; Fontana, A. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids 2004, 1686, 100 107 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2004.09.002
    62. 62
      Mene-Saffrane, L.; Dubugnon, L.; Chetelat, A.; Stolz, S.; Gouhier-Darimont, C.; Farmer, E. E. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 1702 1708 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M807114200
    63. 63
      Goncalves, E. C.; Wilkie, A. C.; Kirst, M.; Rathinasabapathi, B. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2015,  DOI: 10.1111/pbi.12523
    64. 64
      Merchant, S. S.; Kropat, J.; Liu, B.; Shaw, J.; Warakanont, J. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2012, 23, 352 363 DOI: 10.1016/j.copbio.2011.12.001
    65. 65
      Hunter, J. E.; Frada, M. J.; Fredricks, H. F.; Vardi, A.; Van Mooy, B. A. S. Front. Mar. Sci. 2015, 2, 81 DOI: 10.3389/fmars.2015.00081
    66. 66
      Sumner, L.; Amberg, A.; Barrett, D.; Beale, M.; Beger, R.; Daykin, C. Metabolomics 2007, 3, 211 221 DOI: 10.1007/s11306-007-0082-2
    67. 67
      Senger, T.; Wichard, T.; Kunze, S.; Gobel, C.; Lerchl, J.; Pohnert, G.; Feussner, I. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 7588 7596 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M411738200
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information

    ARTICLE SECTIONS
    Jump To

    The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b01260.

    • Methodological details, instructions for obtaining all software and data, supplementary discussion, supplementary data figures, supplementary data tables, and a supplementary chart showing examples of the types of isomers that can be identified with LOBSTAHS (PDF)


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

You’ve supercharged your research process with ACS and Mendeley!

STEP 1:
Click to create an ACS ID

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

MENDELEY PAIRING EXPIRED
Your Mendeley pairing has expired. Please reconnect