ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
Branched Hybridization Chain Reaction Circuit for Ultrasensitive Localizable Imaging of mRNA in Living Cells
My Activity
  • Free to Read
Letter

Branched Hybridization Chain Reaction Circuit for Ultrasensitive Localizable Imaging of mRNA in Living Cells
Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

View Author Information
Institute of Chemical Biology and Nanomedicine, State Key Laboratory of Chemo/Bio-Sensing and Chemometrics, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, P. R. China
*E-mail: [email protected]. Fax: +86-731-88821916.
Open PDFSupporting Information (1)

Analytical Chemistry

Cite this: Anal. Chem. 2018, 90, 3, 1502–1505
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.7b04848
Published January 4, 2018

Copyright © 2018 American Chemical Society. This publication is available under these Terms of Use.

Abstract

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Hybridization chain reaction (HCR) circuits are valuable approaches to monitor low-abundance mRNA, and current HCR is still subjected to issues such as limited amplification efficiency, compromised localization resolution, or complicated designs. We report a novel branched HCR (bHCR) circuit for efficient signal-amplified imaging of mRNA in living cells. The bHCR can be realized using a simplified design by hierarchically coupling two HCR circuits with two split initiator fragments of the secondary HCR circuit incorporated in the probes for the primary HCR circuit. The bHCR circuit enables one to generate a hyperbranched assembly seeded from a single target initiator, affording the potential for localizing single target molecules in live cells. In vitro assays show that bHCR offers very high amplification efficiency and specificity in single mismatch discrimination with a detection limit of 500 fM. Live cell studies reveal that bHCR displays intense fluorescence spots indicating mRNA localization in living cells with improved contrast. The bHCR method can provide a useful platform for low-abundance biomarker detection and imaging for cell biology and diagnostics.

This publication is licensed for personal use by The American Chemical Society.

Copyright © 2018 American Chemical Society

Messenger RNAs (mRNAs) play a fundamental role in conveying the genetic blueprint encoded by DNA to proteins. Abnormalities of mRNA expression could be useful biomarkers for various diseases such as cancer. (1) Hybridization based probes allowing directly detection and imaging of endogenous mRNA in living cells afford a valuable approach for study of mRNA biology and diagnosis of related diseases. (2) Molecular beacons (MBs) (3, 4) and spherical nucleic acids (SNAs) (5, 6) are the most common probes for mRNA detection in living cells. These probes convert the mRNA hybridization events into fluorescence signals in an equivalent reaction ratio. The lack of signal amplification in these probes limits their utility for expression analysis of low-abundance mRNA. While expression of mRNA is heterogeneous, failures in monitoring the low-abundance subpopulations could be impediments to understanding the functions of these mRNA and early assessment of the associated diseases. (7)

Nucleic acid amplification provides a direct solution to expression analysis of low-abundance mRNA. (8, 9) Recent development of nucleic acid circuits, such as hybridization chain reaction (HCR), (10-12) cascade hybridization reaction, (13) catalyzed hairpin assembly (CHA), (14) and entropy driven catalysis, (15) has enabled programming of the kinetically controlled assembly of DNA modules, which creates an efficient approach for nonenzymatic amplification. An obvious advantage of such isothermal, enzyme-free amplification is the applicability to highly sensitive nucleic acid based sensors for signal amplified imaging in living cells. Motivated by this rationale, others (14, 16, 17) and our group (18) have developed sensitive imaging approaches for visualizing RNAs in living cells. Nonetheless, current nonenzymatic amplification circuits are realized in chain-like reactions, only conferring limited efficiency in signal amplification and compromised resolution for localization. To address this issue, new HCR circuits with nonlinear or branched reactions have been developed. (19-22) We have demonstrated a branched HCR design that is realized using multistep consecutive reactions for visualization of single mRNA molecule in fixed cells or tissues. (19) However, the multiple reaction and washing steps preclude its applications in living cells. Other dendritic or hyperbranched HCR circuits, though allowing generating a hyperbranched assembly in a single reaction, (20-23) still require complicated designs using multiple-hairpin probes or multiple probes. Moreover, these nonlinear HCR circuits have been largely unexplored for mRNA imaging.

Herein, we report a novel branched HCR (bHCR) circuit that allows formation of a hyperbranched assembly of probes in a single reaction using a simplified design for efficient signal-amplified imaging of mRNA in living cells. This bHCR strategy relies on a hierarchical coupling design of two HCR circuits in a single reaction, as illustrated in Scheme 1. A primary linear HCR circuit is designed using two hairpin probes H1 and H2, which are triggered by target mRNA to form the backbone chain of the hyperbranched assembly. A distinct design of probes H1 and H2 is that two split initiator fragments of the secondary HCR are incorporated in the loop region of H1 and the toehold region of H2, respectively. When the backbone assembly forms in response to target mRNA, these split initiator fragments are drawn into close proximity, activating the secondary HCR circuit and enabling branched growth of chain-like assembly between hairpin probes H3 and H4. The hierarchical coupling of the primary and the secondary HCR circuits is able to generate a hyperbranched, brush-like assembly with a single mRNA target as the initiator. In order to light up the mRNA target, the probe F–H3 is designed to have a fluorophore FAM and a quencher BHQ1 in the stem region of H3. This design allows the probe to exhibit a low fluorescence background in its folded, hairpin state while deliver enhanced fluorescence in the hyperbranched assembly in which H3 is extended by hybridization with H4. When the probes H1, H2, H3, and H4 are transfected into cells, a hyperbranched, highly fluorescent assembly of these probes is generated seeded from each single mRNA target, enabling high-contrast and spatially localizable imaging of the mRNA target. Hence, our design can provide a useful platform for highly sensitive and localizable imaging of intracellular mRNA, especially for the low-abundance subpopulations.

Scheme 1

Scheme 1. Working Principle of bHCR for mRNA Imaging

To demonstrate the principle of our bHCR strategy for mRNA imaging in living cells, we chose survivin mRNA, an important biomarker overexpressed in many malignant tumors, (24) as the model target. On the basis of bioinformatic calculation of the secondary structure of the mRNA, a target region of 24 nucleotides with no predicted hairpin structure was selected. Accordingly, the hairpin probes for the primary HCR circuit H1 and H2 and for the secondary circuit H3 and H4 were designed. To investigate the feasibility of these probes, the primary and secondary HCR circuits were first analyzed using agarose gel electrophoresis. Gel images showed that bright ladder-like bands characteristic for HCR circuits were obtained when 1 μM target RNA sequence T was incubating with 1 μM H1 and 1 μM H2, or 1 μM secondary initiator sequence T2 was incubating with 1 μM H3 and 1 μM H4 (Figure S-1). The results verified HCR assembly of H1 and H2 or H3 and H4 seeded by target RNA sequence or secondary initiator sequence, respectively. We also observed brighter bands with larger molecular weights with lower concentration of the initiators, suggesting a high ratio of probes to initiator gave larger HCR assembly. No new bands appeared when the initiator was absent. These results evidenced successful construction of the primary and secondary HCR circuits. After confirming two individual HCR circuits, we examined bHCR using gel electrophoresis (Figure 1a). After incubating 250 nM target T with 500 nM H1, 500 nM H2, 1 μM H3, and 1 μM H4, we obtained many bright bands with size around 10 000 bp (lane 4). In contrast, the linear HCR products obtained by incubating 250 nM T with 500 nM H1, 500 nM H2 (lane 1), or incubating 500 nM T2 with 1 μM H3 and 1 μM H4 (lane 2) gave much smaller sizes. Incubation of 250 nM T with 500 nM H1 and 500 nM H2 (lane 3) and 1 μM H3 also gave smaller-size bands as linear HCR. These observations manifested that coupling of two individual HCR circuits afforded larger assembly of the probes, validating the proposed bHCR design. In the absence of target T, there were some low-fluorescence bands (lane 5), which were attributed to marginal system leakage from imperfectly annealed hairpins.

Figure 1

Figure 1. (a) Gel electrophoresis analysis of bHCR: lane 1, 500 nM H1 and 500 nM H2 with 250 nM T; lane 2, 1 μM H3 and 1 μM H4 with 500 nM T2; lane 3, 500 nM H1, 500 nM H2, 1 μM H3 with 250 nM T; lane 4, 500 nM H1, 500 nM H2, 1 μM H3 and 1 μM H4 with 250 nM T; lane 5, 500 nM H1, 500 nM H2, 1 μM H3 and 1 μM H4. (b–f) AFM images of the assembly products in primary HCR circuit (b), secondary HCR circuit (c), bHCR system in the presence of T (d), and absence of T (e). Part f is enlarged details of part d. Scale bar: 200 nm.

To further confirm the bHCR system, we directly visualized the morphology of the assembly products with AFM imaging. When only incubating H1, H2, H3, and H4, we obtained tiny spots with heights of ∼1.5 nm (Figure 1e), which were ascribed to the hairpin probes failing to be assembled in the absence of target RNA. In contrast, linear structures were found when T was incubated with H1 and H2 or T2 was incubated with H3 and H4 (Figure 1b,c), suggesting linear polymers generated in HCR. Many branched structures were found in the bHCR system upon incubating target T with H1, H2, H3, and H4 (Figure 1e,f and Figure S-2). The bHCR products were polydisperse both in sizes and branching efficiency because of the random assembly of the hairpins which, therefore, also generated a few smaller linear polymers. These images gave clear evidence for branched assembly in the bHCR system. This finding was consistent with the extended bands of varying molecular weights in the gel images.

The bHCR system was further investigated using fluorescence spectroscopy for in vitro detection of target sequence. Incubation of 200 nM H1, 200 nM H2, 200 nM F–H3, and 200 nM H4 for 3 h at 37 °C only gave a weak fluorescence peak (Figure 2a), indicating low fluorescence background and marginal leakage for the bHCR system. Appreciable fluorescence activation was observed when 2 nM target sequence T was incubated with 200 nM H1, 200 nM H2, 200 nM F–H3, and 200 nM H4, and the signal-to-background ratio was ∼8 fold. This observation implied high-contrast activation of the bHCR system in response to the target. Interestingly, incubation of 200 nM F–H1 and 200 nM H2 with 2 nM T merely showed a slight increase of the fluorescence peak, and the signal-to-background ratio (4.4-fold) was much smaller than that obtained in the bHCR system. This result clearly demonstrated the higher amplification efficiency of bHCR than conventional linear HCR. Selectivity analysis of the bHCR systems was examined using a one-base mutation sequence of the target. The obtained fluorescence intensity exhibited little enhancement to the background, implying that the bHCR system afforded very high selectivity with the ability to discriminating single-base mutations. The fluorescence peaks were also found to be dynamically dependent upon the concentrations of target sequence in a three-decade range from 1 pM to 2 nM (Figure 2b). A quasi-linear correlation was obtained for peak intensities at 523 nm to target concentrations ranging from 1 pM to 0.8 nM (Figure 2c). The detection limit was estimated as low as 500 fM, which was much better than current dendritic or hyperbranched HCR circuits. (20-23) A further comparison was performed between the bHCR system and conventional linear HCR circuit consisting of hairpins F–H1 and H2 and the corresponding initiator T. It was found that the fluorescence background of the linear HCR system was 2-fold lower than that of the bHCR circuit. The result was sensible as the system leakage was also amplified by the hierarchical coupling of two HCR circuits. The fluorescence responses of the linear HCR system were also dynamically correlated to target concentrations, and the peak fluorescence intensities showed linear correlation to target concentrations in the range from 20 pM to 5 nM with a detection limit of 10 pM (Figure S-1). The results revealed that the bHCR system offered higher sensitivity than the linear HCR assay. At different target concentrations, the bHCR system was found to consistently give higher signal-to-background ratios than the linear HCR (Figure 2d). These data testified that bHCR provided much higher amplification efficiency than the linear HCR system, indicating the successful branched growth of the brush-like secondary HCR polymers along the primary HCR assemblies. In addition, time-dependent measurements showed that the peak intensities increased with increasing reaction time, and at a lower concentration the reaction required prolonged time to achieved saturated responses (Figure S-4).

Figure 2

Figure 2. (a) Fluorescence spectral responses for mixtures of 200 nM H1 and 200 nM H2 (blue); 200 nM F–H1 and 200 nM H2 with 2 nM T (green); 200 nM H1 and 200 nM H2, 200 nM F–H3 and 200 nM H4 (black); 200 nM H1, 200 nM H2, 200 nM F–H3, and 200 nM H4 with 2 nM T (pink); or with 2 nM one-base mismatched T (Mu-T) (red). (b) Fluorescence responses of bHCR system to T of varying concentrations. (c) Calibration curves of fluorescence intensities versus target concentrations. Inset shows the linear relationship between fluorescence intensities and target concentrations in the linear range. (d) Histograms of signal-to-background (STB) ratios of bHCR system (blue) and linear system (red) at different target concentrations.

Next, we explored the ability of bHCR for imaging of mRNA in living cells. When HeLa cells were transfected with the hairpin probes H1, H2, F–H3, and H4 using Lipofectamine 3000, very intense green fluorescent spots was observed in the cells (Figure 3a). A control experiment using C166 cells with no expression of target mRNA (25) revealed that almost no fluorescent spots appeared in the cells (Figure 3b). This result evidenced that these bright fluorescent spots found in HeLa cells were specific to target mRNA, implying that fluorescent spots were ascribed to the hyperbranched assembly of hairpin probes seeded from target mRNA. Furthermore, we transfected HeLa cells using only two probes F–H1 and H2 in the linear HCR system. As anticipated, the image only showed fewer and much weak fluorescent spots in the cells. The average fluorescence intensity of the spots in the bHCR circuit were found to be ∼5-fold enhancement as compared to that for the linear HCR system. Further flow cytometry assay of these three types of cells also revealed that bHCR gave much higher fluorescence signals than linear HCR (Figure S-5). These findings clearly proved that bHCR had the promise in affording higher amplification efficiency and better sensitivity in live cell imaging relative to linear HCR.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Fluorescence images for (a) HeLa cells transfected with H1, H2, F–H3, and H4; (b) C166 cells transfected with H1, H2, and F–H3 H4; (c) HeLa cells transfected with F–H1 and H2. (1) Fluorescence; (2) merged with DIC. Scale bar: 20 μm.

The bHCR circuits was further applied to fluorescence imaging of different cell lines, HeLa, HepG-2, and C166. It was found that HeLa cells showed many more fluorescence spots than HepG2 cells (Figure S-6), indicating higher expression of survivin mRNA in HeLa cells than HepG2 cells. This result was consistent with the finding reported previously. (25) With HeLa cells pretreated using 5 nM or 10 nM YM155, an imidazolium-based compound specifically repressing survivin mRNA expression, (26) followed by transfection of the probes, we also found quite a few intense fluorescent spots in the cells treated using 5 nM YM155 and much less fluorescent spots appeared in the cells treated using 5 nM YM155 (Figure S-7). These results confirmed the knock-down effect of YM155 in regulating survivin mRNA. To validate the results, quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) analysis of the expression of survivin mRNA in these cells was performed (Figure S-8). The results revealed that the number of intense fluorescent spots in the cells increased with increasing expression levels of target mRNA in the cells. This result verified the ability of the bHCR circuit for quantitative imaging mRNA expression in living cells.

In conclusion, we successfully demonstrated a novel bHCR circuit for ultrasensitive imaging of mRNA in living cells. This bHCR strategy exploited a hierarchical coupling of two HCR circuits in a single reaction and could be developed using a simplified design by incorporating two split initiator fragments in the probes in the primary HCR circuit. The bHCR circuit enabled to generated a hyperbranched assembly seeded from a single target initiator, which provided the possibility of localizing single target molecules in live cell imaging applications. The result revealed that bHCR generated highly branched structures with high molecular weights in response to target sequence with a detection limit of 500 fM and high specificity in single mismatch discrimination. The bHCR system was also demonstrated to display intense fluorescence spots indicating the localization of target mRNA in living cells. Collectively, this bHCR strategy can provide a powerful platform for low-abundance biomarker detection and imaging for cell biology and clinical diagnostics.

Supporting Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.7b04848.

  • Experimental methods including materials and instruments, gel electrophoresis analysis, AFM imaging, fluorescence measurements, cell culture and fluorescence imaging, flow cytometry assay, and RT-PCR assay (PDF)

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

  • Corresponding Authors
    • Ru-Qin Yu - Institute of Chemical Biology and Nanomedicine, State Key Laboratory of Chemo/Bio-Sensing and Chemometrics, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, P. R. ChinaOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-7412-8360 Email: [email protected]
    • Jian-Hui Jiang - Institute of Chemical Biology and Nanomedicine, State Key Laboratory of Chemo/Bio-Sensing and Chemometrics, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, P. R. ChinaOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0003-1594-4023 Email: [email protected]
  • Authors
    • Lan Liu - Institute of Chemical Biology and Nanomedicine, State Key Laboratory of Chemo/Bio-Sensing and Chemometrics, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, P. R. China
    • Jin-Wen Liu - Institute of Chemical Biology and Nanomedicine, State Key Laboratory of Chemo/Bio-Sensing and Chemometrics, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, P. R. China
    • Han Wu - Institute of Chemical Biology and Nanomedicine, State Key Laboratory of Chemo/Bio-Sensing and Chemometrics, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, P. R. China
    • Xiang-Nan Wang - Institute of Chemical Biology and Nanomedicine, State Key Laboratory of Chemo/Bio-Sensing and Chemometrics, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, P. R. China
  • Notes
    The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgment

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This work was supported by NSFC (Grants 21527810 and 21521063).

References

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article references 26 other publications.

  1. 1
    Tyagi, S. Nat. Methods 2009, 6, 331 338 DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.1321
  2. 2
    Xia, Y.; Zhang, R.; Wang, Z.; Tian, J.; Chen, X. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 2824 2843 DOI: 10.1039/C6CS00675B
  3. 3
    Tyagi, S.; Kramer, F. R. Nat. Biotechnol. 1996, 14, 303 308 DOI: 10.1038/nbt0396-303
  4. 4
    Qiu, L.; Wu, C.; You, M.; Han, D.; Chen, T.; Zhu, G.; Jiang, J.; Yu, R.; Tan, W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 12952 12955 DOI: 10.1021/ja406252w
  5. 5
    Seferos, D. S.; Giljohann, D. A.; Hill, H. D.; Prigodich, A. E.; Mirkin, C. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 15477 15479 DOI: 10.1021/ja0776529
  6. 6
    Cutler, J. I.; Auyeung, E.; Mirkin, C. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 1376 1391 DOI: 10.1021/ja209351u
  7. 7
    Visvader, J. E. Nature 2011, 469, 314 322 DOI: 10.1038/nature09781
  8. 8
    Zhang, H.; Li, F.; Dever, B.; Li, X.; Le, X. C. Chem. Rev. 2013, 113, 2812 2841 DOI: 10.1021/cr300340p
  9. 9
    Zhao, Y.; Chen, F.; Li, Q.; Wang, L.; Fan, C. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 12491 12545 DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00428
  10. 10
    Dirks, R. M.; Pierce, N. A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2004, 101, 15275 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0407024101
  11. 11
    Bi, S.; Yue, S.; Zhang, S. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 4281 4298 DOI: 10.1039/C7CS00055C
  12. 12
    Chen, Y.; Xu, J.; Su, J.; Xiang, Y.; Yuan, R.; Chai, Y. Anal. Chem. 2012, 84, 7750 7755 DOI: 10.1021/ac3012285
  13. 13
    Cheglakov, Z.; Cronin, T. M.; He, C.; Weizmann, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 6116 6119 DOI: 10.1021/jacs.5b01451
  14. 14
    Jiang, Y.; Li, B.; Milligan, J. N.; Bhadra, S.; Ellington, A. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 7430 DOI: 10.1021/ja4023978
  15. 15
    Zhang, D. Y.; Turberfield, A. J.; Yurke, B.; Winfree, E. Science 2007, 318, 1121 1125 DOI: 10.1126/science.1148532
  16. 16
    Wu, C.; Cansiz, S.; Zhang, L.; Teng, I.; Qiu, L.; Li, J.; Liu, Y.; Zhou, C.; Hu, R.; Zhang, T.; Cui, C.; Cui, L.; Tan, W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 4900 4903 DOI: 10.1021/jacs.5b00542
  17. 17
    Li, L.; Feng, J.; Liu, H.; Li, Q.; Tong, L.; Tang, B. Chem. Sci. 2016, 7, 1940 1945 DOI: 10.1039/C5SC03909F
  18. 18
    Wu, Z.; Liu, G. Q.; Yang, X. L.; Jiang, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 6829 DOI: 10.1021/jacs.5b01778
  19. 19
    Tang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Tang, L.; Yu, R.; Jiang, J. Anal. Chem. 2017, 89, 3445 3451 DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b04312
  20. 20
    Xuan, F.; Hsing, I. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 9810 9813 DOI: 10.1021/ja502904s
  21. 21
    Bi, S.; Chen, M.; Jia, X.; Dong, Y.; Wang, Z. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 8144 8148 DOI: 10.1002/anie.201501457
  22. 22
    Chandran, H.; Rangnekar, A.; Shetty, G.; Schultes, E. A.; Reif, J. H.; LaBean, T. H. Biotechnol. J. 2013, 8, 221 227 DOI: 10.1002/biot.201100499
  23. 23
    Wei, J.; Gong, X.; Wang, Q.; Pan, M.; Liu, X.; Liu, J.; Xia, F.; Wang, F. Chem. Sci. 2018, 9, 52 DOI: 10.1039/C7SC03939E
  24. 24
    Chi, Y.; Wang, X.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, C.; Ertl, H. C.; Zhou, D. Mol. Ther.--Nucleic Acids 2014, 3, e208 DOI: 10.1038/mtna.2014.59
  25. 25
    Peng, X. H.; Cao, Z. H.; Xia, J. T.; Carlson, G. W.; Lewis, M. M.; Wood, W. C.; Yang, L. Cancer Res. 2005, 65, 1909 1917 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-3196
  26. 26
    Yamanaka, K.; Nakahara, T.; Yamauchi, T.; Kita, A.; Takeuchi, M.; Kiyonaga, F.; Kaneko, N.; Sasamata, M. Clin. Cancer Res. 2011, 17, 5423 31 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-3410

Cited By

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!
Citation Statements
Explore this article's citation statements on scite.ai

This article is cited by 86 publications.

  1. Shiyuan Liu, Jiaoli Wang, Yu Chen, Jiahao Fan, Bin Du, Ruiting Liu, Xiaobei Zhu, Kemin Wang, Nuli Xie, Jin Huang. Modular Assembled Localized Hybridization Chain Reaction for In Situ mRNA Amplified Imaging. Nano Letters 2024, 24 (37) , 11590-11598. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.4c03099
  2. Mengdie Li, Jiayang He, Xin Shang, Chunli Yang, Yuqing Zhang, Siyu Zuo, Ruo Yuan, Wenju Xu. A Reciprocal-Amplifiable Fluorescence Sensing Platform via Replicated Hybridization Chain Reaction for Hosting Concatenated Multi-Ag Nanoclusters as Signal Reporter. Analytical Chemistry 2022, 94 (47) , 16427-16435. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.2c03782
  3. Fang Yang, Shunmei Li, Xia Li, Ruo Yuan, Yun Xiang. Robust DNA Cross-Linked Polymeric Lighting-Up Nanogel Facilitates Sensitive Live Cell MicroRNA Imaging. Analytical Chemistry 2022, 94 (46) , 16079-16085. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.2c03217
  4. Dan-Dan Wang, Juan Zhang, Qiao-Qin Yu, Ke Zhang, Ting-Ting Chen, Xia Chu. Biomineralized Zeolitic Imidazolate Framework-8 Nanoparticles Enable Polymerase-Driven DNA Biocomputing for Reliable Cell Identification. Analytical Chemistry 2022, 94 (11) , 4794-4802. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.1c05605
  5. Weijun Wang, Yansha Gao, Wenqing Wang, Jingjing Zhang, Qian Li, Zai-Sheng Wu. Ultrasensitive Electrochemical Detection of cancer-Related Point Mutations Based on Surface-Initiated Three-Dimensionally Self-Assembled DNA Nanostructures from Only Two Palindromic Probes. Analytical Chemistry 2022, 94 (2) , 1029-1036. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.1c03991
  6. Peng Gao, Xiaoying Shen, Xiaohan Liu, Bingjie Cui, Mengzhen Wang, Xiuyan Wan, Na Li, Bo Tang. Covalent Organic Framework-Derived Carbonous Nanoprobes for Cancer Cell Imaging. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2021, 13 (35) , 41498-41506. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.1c14998
  7. Hua Chai, Wenbo Cheng, Dayong Jin, Peng Miao. Recent Progress in DNA Hybridization Chain Reaction Strategies for Amplified Biosensing. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2021, 13 (33) , 38931-38946. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.1c09000
  8. Qiuxia Hao, Qingzhang Xu, Shuyan Niu, Caifeng Ding, Xiliang Luo. Anti-Fouling Magnetic Beads Combined with Signal Amplification Strategies for Ultra-Sensitive and Selective Electrochemiluminescence Detection of MicroRNAs in Complex Biological Media. Analytical Chemistry 2021, 93 (30) , 10679-10687. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.1c02186
  9. Xiaocui Huang, Xiangbing Bian, Lifen Chen, Longhua Guo, Bin Qiu, Zhenyu lin. Highly Sensitive Homogeneous Electrochemiluminescence Biosensor for Alkaline Phosphatase Detection Based on Click Chemistry-Triggered Branched Hybridization Chain Reaction. Analytical Chemistry 2021, 93 (29) , 10351-10357. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.1c02094
  10. Wen Yi Lv, Chun Hong Li, Yuan Fang Li, Shu Jun Zhen, Cheng Zhi Huang. Hierarchical Hybridization Chain Reaction for Amplified Signal Output and Cascade DNA Logic Circuits. Analytical Chemistry 2021, 93 (7) , 3411-3417. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.0c04483
  11. Xueli Zhu, Bin Qu, Zhan-Ming Ying, Jin-Wen Liu, Zhenkun Wu, Ru-Qin Yu, Jian-Hui Jiang. Cascade Circuits on Self-Assembled DNA Polymers for Targeted RNA Imaging In Vivo. Analytical Chemistry 2020, 92 (24) , 15953-15958. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.0c03400
  12. Chuyan Zhang, Jing Chen, Rui Sun, Zhijun Huang, Zewei Luo, Chen Zhou, Mengfan Wu, Yixiang Duan, Yongxin Li. The Recent Development of Hybridization Chain Reaction Strategies in Biosensors. ACS Sensors 2020, 5 (10) , 2977-3000. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssensors.0c01453
  13. Jinlu Tang, Yanli Lei, Xiaoxiao He, Jianbo Liu, Hui Shi, Kemin Wang. Recognition-Driven Remodeling of Dual-Split Aptamer Triggering In Situ Hybridization Chain Reaction for Activatable and Autonomous Identification of Cancer Cells. Analytical Chemistry 2020, 92 (15) , 10839-10846. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.0c02524
  14. Sasha B. Ebrahimi, Devleena Samanta, Chad A. Mirkin. DNA-Based Nanostructures for Live-Cell Analysis. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2020, 142 (26) , 11343-11356. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.0c04978
  15. Meng-Qi He, Shuai Chen, Jie Meng, Wei Shi, Kun Wang, Yong-Liang Yu, Jian-Hua Wang. Capping Ligand Size-Dependent LSPR Property Based on DNA Nanostructure-Mediated Morphological Evolution of Gold Nanorods for Ultrasensitive Visualization of Target DNA. Analytical Chemistry 2020, 92 (10) , 7054-7061. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.0c00321
  16. Vladimir R. Cherkasov, Elizaveta N. Mochalova, Andrey V. Babenyshev, Alexandra V. Vasilyeva, Petr I. Nikitin, Maxim P. Nikitin. Nanoparticle Beacons: Supersensitive Smart Materials with On/Off-Switchable Affinity to Biomedical Targets. ACS Nano 2020, 14 (2) , 1792-1803. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.9b07569
  17. Hanyong Peng, Ashley M. Newbigging, Michael S. Reid, Jagdeesh S. Uppal, Jingyang Xu, Hongquan Zhang, X. Chris Le. Signal Amplification in Living Cells: A Review of microRNA Detection and Imaging. Analytical Chemistry 2020, 92 (1) , 292-308. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.9b04752
  18. Qiong Wu, Hong Wang, Keke Gong, Jinhua Shang, Xiaoqing Liu, Fuan Wang. Construction of an Autonomous Nonlinear Hybridization Chain Reaction for Extracellular Vesicles-Associated MicroRNAs Discrimination. Analytical Chemistry 2019, 91 (15) , 10172-10179. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.9b02181
  19. Chengcheng Gu, Xinke Kong, Xiaojuan Liu, Panpan Gai, Feng Li. Enzymatic Biofuel-Cell-Based Self-Powered Biosensor Integrated with DNA Amplification Strategy for Ultrasensitive Detection of Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism. Analytical Chemistry 2019, 91 (13) , 8697-8704. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.9b02510
  20. Yao Yao, Dan Zhao, Na Li, Fuzhi Shen, Jeremiah Ong’achwa Machuki, Dongzhi Yang, Jingjing Li, Daoquan Tang, Yanyan Yu, Jiangwei Tian, Haifeng Dong, Fenglei Gao. Multifunctional Fe3O4@Polydopamine@DNA-Fueled Molecular Machine for Magnetically Targeted Intracellular Zn2+ Imaging and Fluorescence/MRI Guided Photodynamic-Photothermal Therapy. Analytical Chemistry 2019, 91 (12) , 7850-7857. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.9b01591
  21. Yao Yao, Na Li, Xing Zhang, Jeremiah Ong’achwa Machuki, Dongzhi Yang, Yanyan Yu, Jingjing Li, Daoquan Tang, Jiangwei Tian, Fenglei Gao. DNA-Templated Silver Nanocluster/Porphyrin/MnO2 Platform for Label-Free Intracellular Zn2+ Imaging and Fluorescence-/Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Photodynamic Therapy. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2019, 11 (15) , 13991-14003. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b01530
  22. Yanxin Chu, An-Ping Deng, Wenjing Wang, Jun-Jie Zhu. Concatenated Catalytic Hairpin Assembly/Hyperbranched Hybridization Chain Reaction Based Enzyme-Free Signal Amplification for the Sensitive Photoelectrochemical Detection of Human Telomerase RNA. Analytical Chemistry 2019, 91 (5) , 3619-3627. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.8b05610
  23. Hongfei He, Jianyuan Dai, Guixiu Dong, Hongli Shi, Fang Wang, Yunran Qiu, Ruoxing Liao, Cuisong Zhou, Yong Guo, Dan Xiao. Self-Replication-Assisted Rapid Preparation of DNA Nanowires at Room Temperature and Its Biosensing Application. Analytical Chemistry 2019, 91 (4) , 3043-3047. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.8b05431
  24. Lei Yang, Qiong Wu, Yuqi Chen, Xiaoqing Liu, Fuan Wang, Xiang Zhou. Amplified MicroRNA Detection and Intracellular Imaging Based on an Autonomous and Catalytic Assembly of DNAzyme. ACS Sensors 2019, 4 (1) , 110-117. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssensors.8b01000
  25. Xudong Wang, Jun Dai, Xuehong Min, Zhihua Yu, Yong Cheng, Kaixun Huang, Juliang Yang, Xiaoqing Yi, Xiaoding Lou, Fan Xia. DNA-Conjugated Amphiphilic Aggregation-Induced Emission Probe for Cancer Tissue Imaging and Prognosis Analysis. Analytical Chemistry 2018, 90 (13) , 8162-8169. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.8b01456
  26. Sayantan Tripathy, Ng Ka Wai, Sahil Sharma, Ngoc Nhu Vu, Siddhant Jaitpal, Fatemah Zare, Muskaan Singh, Liam McDaid, Saugat Bhattacharyya, Gerard L. Coté, Samuel B. Mabbott. A Locked Aptamer-Magnetic Nanoparticle Assay for Cardiac Troponin I Classification to Support Myocardial Infarction Diagnosis in Resource-Limited Environments. Biosensors and Bioelectronics 2025, 32 , 117590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2025.117590
  27. Jinglin Fu, Qiaochu Zhang, Shiming Liu, Derek Puyat, Akshay Shah, Alireza Ebrahimimojarad, Sung Won Oh. Rapid Amplification and Detection of Single‐Stranded Nucleic Acids for Point‐of‐Care Diagnosis. Small Methods 2025, 37 https://doi.org/10.1002/smtd.202401733
  28. Su-Jing Zhao, Zhenkun Wu, Jian-Hui Jiang. A Fluorogenic Sensor via Catalytic Hairpin Assembly for Precise Live-Cell Imaging of mRNA. 2025, 165-175. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-4248-1_14
  29. Ting Chen, Xiaojiao Wang, Rongrong Gao, Meihe Yuan, Mei Chen, Xiao-Bing Zhang, Guoliang Ke. Size-selective hybridization chain reaction for accurate signal amplification in living cancer cells. Science China Chemistry 2024, 67 (12) , 4259-4266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11426-024-2294-x
  30. Hang Gong, Shufen Yao, Xiaojia Zhao, Feng Chen, Chunyan Chen, Changqun Cai. DNA nanosensor based on bipedal 3D DNA walker–driven proximal catalytic hairpin assembly for sensitive and fast TK1 mRNA detection. Microchimica Acta 2024, 191 (8) https://doi.org/10.1007/s00604-024-06569-w
  31. Mingzhu Fan, Xiaohong Zhong, Yanshi Wei, Rong Wang, Yifang He, Yuhui Liu, Xin Huang, Zhihui Luo, Jiayao Xu, Shulong Wang, Yong Huang. A smart mRNA-initiated DNAzyme nanogenerator for precise imaging and gene therapy in vivo. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical 2024, 411 , 135742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2024.135742
  32. Xing Lu, Xujiao Zhou, Bin Song, Hong Zhang, Mingrui Cheng, Xingyu Zhu, Yuqi Wu, Haoliang Shi, Binbin Chu, Yao He, Houyu Wang, Jiaxu Hong. Framework Nucleic Acids Combined with 3D Hybridization Chain Reaction Amplifiers for Monitoring Multiple Human Tear Cytokines. Advanced Materials 2024, 36 (26) https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202400622
  33. Qiuyan Huang, Kun Wang, Yuan Wang. Highly sensitive miRNA-21 detection with enzyme-free cascade amplification biosensor. Talanta 2024, 273 , 125928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2024.125928
  34. Xiaojing Xing, Mengying Gao, Minglin Lei, Kunqi Cheng, Yifan Zhao, Xianchao Du, Luyi Zong, Dongfang Qiu, Xueguo Liu. MOF-mediated dual energy transfer nanoprobe integrated with exonuclease III amplification strategy for highly sensitive detection of DNA. Analytical Methods 2024, 16 (13) , 1916-1922. https://doi.org/10.1039/D4AY00127C
  35. Cong Fan, Longjie Xie, Feng Zhao, Jingjing Wang, Xiandong Lin, Xian Chen. Novel fluorescence nano-orbital biosensor for highly sensitive microRNA detection. Analytica Chimica Acta 2024, 1288 , 342172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2023.342172
  36. Yousuke Tsuneoka, Hiromasa Funato. Whole Brain Mapping of Orexin Receptor mRNA Expression Visualized by Branched In Situ Hybridization Chain Reaction. eneuro 2024, 11 (2) , ENEURO.0474-23.2024. https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0474-23.2024
  37. Zhenli Qiu, Xintong Lin, Yufen Lei, Jinman Zhu, Rongjian Sa, Yiting Chen. Contactless photoelectrochemical biosensors based on hierarchical MXene/Bi2S3 nanosheets with the branched hybridization chain reaction. Biosensors and Bioelectronics 2024, 243 , 115764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2023.115764
  38. Yuanyuan Chen, Hui Jiang, Xiaohui Liu, Xuemei Wang. Engineered Electrochemiluminescence Biosensors for Monitoring Heavy Metal Ions: Current Status and Prospects. Biosensors 2024, 14 (1) , 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios14010009
  39. Lie Li, Suping Li, Jie Wang, Xiaohong Wen, Mei Yang, Haiyan Chen, Qiuping Guo, Kemin Wang. Extracellular ATP-activated hybridization chain reaction for accurate and sensitive detection of cancer cells. Chinese Chemical Letters 2023, 34 (12) , 108399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cclet.2023.108399
  40. Wenjia Wang, Qinyu Ge, Xiangwei Zhao. Enzyme-free isothermal amplification strategy for the detection of tumor-associated biomarkers: A review. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry 2023, 160 , 116960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2023.116960
  41. Chunhuan Xu, Jingjin Zhao, Shengyu Chen, Ivan Yu Sakharov, Shengqiang Hu, Shulin Zhao. An ultrasensitive bunge bedstraw herb type DNA machine for absolute quantification of mRNA in single cell. Biosensors and Bioelectronics 2022, 217 , 114702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2022.114702
  42. Xianghui Li, Yichan Huang, Jiawen Chen, Shuangmu Zhuo, Zhenyu Lin, Jianxin Chen. A highly sensitive homogeneous electrochemiluminescence biosensor for flap endonuclease 1 based on branched hybridization chain reaction amplification and ultrafiltration separation. Bioelectrochemistry 2022, 147 , 108189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioelechem.2022.108189
  43. Xiaowei Wei, Zehan Cai, Lijun Cai, Yu Wang, Dagan Zhang, Yefei Zhu. Photonic Barcodes Combining Branched Hybridization Chain Reaction for Multiplex Quantification of Bladder Cancer MicroRNAs. Advanced Materials Interfaces 2022, 9 (20) https://doi.org/10.1002/admi.202102515
  44. Sima Khajouei, Elyas Hosseinzadeh, Hadi Ravan, Abbas Mohammadi. Binary detection of protein and nucleic acid enabled cancer diagnosis through branched hybridization chain reaction. Analytica Chimica Acta 2022, 1205 , 339755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2022.339755
  45. Yuning Wang, Bin Li, Tongtong Tian, Yujie Liu, Juxiang Zhang, Kun Qian. Advanced on-site and in vitro signal amplification biosensors for biomolecule analysis. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry 2022, 149 , 116565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2022.116565
  46. Shiyuan Liu, Zhenxiang Liu, Huimin Wang, Jiaoli Wang, Ruiting Liu, Kemin Wang, Jin Huang. A novel FRET-based dendritic hybridization chain reaction for tumour-related mRNA imaging. Chemical Communications 2022, 58 (9) , 1414-1417. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1CC06009K
  47. Tingting Xu, Yao Sun, Sha Yu, Shaojun Wu, Yu Su, Ye Tian, Yuanzhen Zhou, Jun-Jie Zhu. A fluorogenic RNA aptamer nanodevice for the low background imaging of mRNA in living cells. Chemical Communications 2022, 58 (9) , 1354-1357. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1CC06582C
  48. Shulin Zhao, Chunhuan Xu, Jingjin Zhao, Shengyu Chen, Ivan Sakharov, Shengqiang Hu. An Ultrasensitive Bunge Bedstraw Herb Type DNA Machine for Absolute Quantification of Mrna in Single Cell. SSRN Electronic Journal 2022, 3 https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4183372
  49. Jingting Wu, Jinrui Lv, Xiaoqi Zheng, Zai-Sheng Wu. Hybridization chain reaction and its applications in biosensing. Talanta 2021, 234 , 122637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2021.122637
  50. Su Li, Yuyin Tang, Linyu Hu, Wenhui Qian, Lijuan Ma, Xuetong Sun, Wenwen Ji, Bei Zhang, Shuying Han, Yumei Chi, Dong Zhu. Autonomously driving multiplexed hierarchical hybridization chain reaction of a DNA cobweb sensor for monitoring intracellular microRNA. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical 2021, 344 , 130205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2021.130205
  51. Zackary A. Zimmers, Alexander D. Boyd, Hannah E. Stepp, Nicholas M. Adams, Frederick R. Haselton. Development of an Automated, Non-Enzymatic Nucleic Acid Amplification Test. Micromachines 2021, 12 (10) , 1204. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi12101204
  52. Long Jiang, Xiaonan Qu, Wenyu Sun, Manru Zhang, Yeru Wang, Yu Wang, Yijin Zhao, Fenfen Zhang, Yuning Leng, Su Liu, Jinghua Yu, Jiadong Huang. A three-dimensional dynamic DNA walker-mediated branching hybridization chain reaction for the ultrasensitive fluorescence sensing of ampicillin. The Analyst 2021, 146 (17) , 5413-5420. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0AN02226H
  53. Xiu Liu, Shengjun Bu, Hongguo Wei, Ze Wang, Songling Yu, Zhongyi Li, Zhuo Hao, Xiuxia He, Jiayu Wan. Visual assay of Escherichia coli O157:H7 based on an isothermal strand displacement and hybrid chain reaction amplification strategy. Analytical Methods 2021, 13 (30) , 3379-3385. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1AY00644D
  54. Meng-Qi He, Shuai Chen, Wei Shi, Xue-Wei Zhang, Yong-Liang Yu, Jian-Hua Wang. All-in-one fractal nanoplasmonic array for visual discrimination of biomolecules and microorganisms. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical 2021, 338 , 129832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2021.129832
  55. Yuqi Huang, Shuhui Zhao, Wenxiu Zhang, Qiuyue Duan, Qi Yan, Hu Fu, Liang Zhong, Gang Yi. Multifunctional electrochemical biosensor with “tetrahedral tripods” assisted multiple tandem hairpins assembly for ultra-sensitive detection of target DNA. RSC Advances 2021, 11 (33) , 20046-20056. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1RA02424H
  56. Idorenyin A. Iwe, Wenqin Li, Zhigang Li, Jiahao Huang. Hairpin DNA-Mediated isothermal amplification (HDMIA) techniques for nucleic acid testing. Talanta 2021, 226 , 122146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2021.122146
  57. Jiafeng Pan, Ying He, Zhi Liu, Junhua Chen. Dual recognition element-controlled logic DNA circuit for COVID-19 detection based on exonuclease III and DNAzyme. Chemical Communications 2021, 57 (9) , 1125-1128. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0CC06799G
  58. Na Wu, Yi-Ting Wang, Xiao-Yan Wang, Xu- Wei Chen, Ting Yang, Jian-Hua Wang. A simple, one-pot and ultrasensitive DNA sensor via Exo III-Assisted target recycling and 3D DNA walker cascade amplification. Analytica Chimica Acta 2021, 1147 , 15-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2020.12.026
  59. Zhuoer Zeng, Rong Zhou, Ruowei Sun, Xun Zhang, Zeneng Cheng, Chuanpin Chen, Qubo Zhu. Nonlinear hybridization chain reaction-based functional DNA nanostructure assembly for biosensing, bioimaging applications. Biosensors and Bioelectronics 2021, 173 , 112814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2020.112814
  60. Xiaohao Liu, Sinuo Yu, Chang Feng, Dongsheng Mao, Jinlong Li, Xiaoli Zhu. In situ Analysis of Cancer Cells Based on DNA Signal Amplification and DNA Nanodevices. Critical Reviews in Analytical Chemistry 2021, 51 (1) , 8-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408347.2019.1674631
  61. Na Li, Fuzhi Shen, Zhiheng Cai, Wenzhen Pan, Yiming Yin, Xuan Deng, Xing Zhang, Jeremiah Ong'achwa Machuki, Yanyan Yu, Dongzhi Yang, Yun Yang, Ming Guan, Fenglei Gao. Target‐Induced Core–Satellite Nanostructure Assembly Strategy for Dual‐Signal‐On Fluorescence Imaging and Raman Quantification of Intracellular MicroRNA Guided Photothermal Therapy. Small 2020, 16 (49) https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202005511
  62. Yan Zhao, Yuanbo Feng, Yuanbo Zhang, Pu Xia, Zihan Xiao, Ziheng Wang, Hongxia Yan. Combining competitive sequestration with nonlinear hybridization chain reaction amplification: an ultra-specific and highly sensitive sensing strategy for single-nucleotide variants. Analytica Chimica Acta 2020, 1130 , 107-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2020.07.022
  63. Shiyan Dai, Yuting Zhou, Guifang Cheng, Pingang He, Yuzhi Fang. Dual-signal electrochemical sensor for detection of cancer cells by the split primer ligation-triggered catalyzed hairpin assembly. Talanta 2020, 217 , 121079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2020.121079
  64. Elyas Hosseinzadeh, Hadi Ravan, Abbas Mohammadi, Hossein Pourghadamyari. Colorimetric detection of miRNA-21 by DNAzyme-coupled branched DNA constructs. Talanta 2020, 216 , 120913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2020.120913
  65. Juan Zhang, Mengyun He, Cunpeng Nie, Manman He, Qingshan Pan, Chang Liu, Yanlei Hu, Tingting Chen, Xia Chu. Biomineralized metal–organic framework nanoparticles enable a primer exchange reaction-based DNA machine to work in living cells for imaging and gene therapy. Chemical Science 2020, 11 (27) , 7092-7101. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0SC00339E
  66. Yousuke Tsuneoka, Hiromasa Funato. Modified in situ Hybridization Chain Reaction Using Short Hairpin DNAs. Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience 2020, 13 https://doi.org/10.3389/fnmol.2020.00075
  67. Devleena Samanta, Sasha B. Ebrahimi, Chad A. Mirkin. Nucleic‐Acid Structures as Intracellular Probes for Live Cells. Advanced Materials 2020, 32 (13) https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201901743
  68. Kaixiang Zhang, Ruijie Deng, Hua Gao, Xucong Teng, Jinghong Li. Lighting up single-nucleotide variation in situ in single cells and tissues. Chemical Society Reviews 2020, 49 (6) , 1932-1954. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9CS00438F
  69. Guang-Li Li, Yong-Hui Xia, Qing Li. Biodegradable MnO2 nanosheet-mediated catalytic hairpin assembly for two-color imaging of mRNAs in living cells. Microchemical Journal 2020, 153 , 104367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2019.104367
  70. Ke Quan, Cuiping Yi, Xiaohai Yang, Xiaoxiao He, Jin Huang, Kemin Wang. FRET-based nucleic acid probes: Basic designs and applications in bioimaging. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry 2020, 124 , 115784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2019.115784
  71. Manman He, Mengyun He, Juan Zhang, Chang Liu, Qingshan Pan, Jintao Yi, Tingting Chen. A spatial-confinement hairpin cascade reaction-based DNA tetrahedral amplifier for mRNA imaging in live cells. Talanta 2020, 207 , 120287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2019.120287
  72. Dan Zhao, Qingxin Yin, Yangyang Chang, Meng Liu. Nucleic acid circuits for cell imaging: From the test tube to the cell. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry 2020, 122 , 115706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2019.115706
  73. Gaolian Xu, Mingliang Lai, Rab Wilson, Andrew Glidle, Julien Reboud, Jonathan M. Cooper. Branched hybridization chain reaction—using highly dimensional DNA nanostructures for label-free, reagent-less, multiplexed molecular diagnostics. Microsystems & Nanoengineering 2019, 5 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41378-019-0076-z
  74. Yao Qin, Daxiu Li, Ruo Yuan, Yun Xiang. Netlike hybridization chain reaction assembly of DNA nanostructures enables exceptional signal amplification for sensing trace cytokines. Nanoscale 2019, 11 (35) , 16362-16367. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9NR04988F
  75. Kumar Vikrant, Neha Bhardwaj, Sanjeev K. Bhardwaj, Ki-Hyun Kim, Akash Deep. Nanomaterials as efficient platforms for sensing DNA. Biomaterials 2019, 214 , 119215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.05.026
  76. Zhihe Qing, Jingyuan Xu, Jinlei Hu, Jing Zheng, Lei He, Zhen Zou, Sheng Yang, Weihong Tan, Ronghua Yang. In Situ Amplification‐Based Imaging of RNA in Living Cells. Angewandte Chemie 2019, 131 (34) , 11698-11709. https://doi.org/10.1002/ange.201812449
  77. Zhihe Qing, Jingyuan Xu, Jinlei Hu, Jing Zheng, Lei He, Zhen Zou, Sheng Yang, Weihong Tan, Ronghua Yang. In Situ Amplification‐Based Imaging of RNA in Living Cells. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 2019, 58 (34) , 11574-11585. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201812449
  78. Takashi Sakamoto, Rikuto Yamada. Label‐Free in Situ Monitoring of the DNA Hybridization Chain Reaction by Using Sequence‐Selective Minor‐Groove‐Binding Fluorophores. ChemBioChem 2019, 20 (10) , 1242-1245. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbic.201800738
  79. Ruijin Zeng, Lijia Zhang, Lingshan Su, Zhongbin Luo, Qian Zhou, Dianping Tang. Photoelectrochemical bioanalysis of antibiotics on rGO-Bi2WO6-Au based on branched hybridization chain reaction. Biosensors and Bioelectronics 2019, 133 , 100-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2019.02.067
  80. Du-Juan Huang, Ting Cao, Zhi-Mei Huang, Zhenkun Wu, Li-Juan Tang, Jian-Hui Jiang. Crosslinking catalytic hairpin assembly for high-contrast imaging of multiple mRNAs in living cells. Chemical Communications 2019, 55 (27) , 3899-3902. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9CC01033E
  81. Kyeonghye Guk, Seul Gee Hwang, Jaewoo Lim, Hye-young Son, Yuna Choi, Yong-Min Huh, Taejoon Kang, Juyeon Jung, Eun-Kyung Lim. Fluorescence amplified sensing platforms enabling miRNA detection by self-circulation of a molecular beacon circuit. Chemical Communications 2019, 55 (24) , 3457-3460. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9CC00351G
  82. Jun Yang, Ben Q. Li, Rongheng Li, Xuesong Mei. Quantum 3D thermal imaging at the micro–nanoscale. Nanoscale 2019, 11 (5) , 2249-2263. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8NR09096C
  83. Qiong Li. Nucleic Acid Amplification Strategy-Based Fluorescence Imaging. 2019, 213-240. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7044-1_11
  84. Dinggeng He, Ka-Wang Wong, Zhenzhen Dong, Hung-Wing Li. Recent progress in live cell mRNA/microRNA imaging probes based on smart and versatile nanomaterials. Journal of Materials Chemistry B 2018, 6 (47) , 7773-7793. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8TB02285B
  85. Peng Zhang, Jennifer Crow, Divya Lella, Xin Zhou, Glenson Samuel, Andrew K. Godwin, Yong Zeng. Ultrasensitive quantification of tumor mRNAs in extracellular vesicles with an integrated microfluidic digital analysis chip. Lab on a Chip 2018, 18 (24) , 3790-3801. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8LC01071D
  86. Xiyue Xie, Yaqin Chai, Yali Yuan, Ruo Yuan. Dual triggers induced disassembly of DNA polymer decorated silver nanoparticle for ultrasensitive electrochemical Pb2+ detection. Analytica Chimica Acta 2018, 1034 , 56-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2018.06.050

Analytical Chemistry

Cite this: Anal. Chem. 2018, 90, 3, 1502–1505
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.7b04848
Published January 4, 2018

Copyright © 2018 American Chemical Society. This publication is available under these Terms of Use.

Article Views

5997

Altmetric

-

Citations

Learn about these metrics

Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.

  • Abstract

    Scheme 1

    Scheme 1. Working Principle of bHCR for mRNA Imaging

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. (a) Gel electrophoresis analysis of bHCR: lane 1, 500 nM H1 and 500 nM H2 with 250 nM T; lane 2, 1 μM H3 and 1 μM H4 with 500 nM T2; lane 3, 500 nM H1, 500 nM H2, 1 μM H3 with 250 nM T; lane 4, 500 nM H1, 500 nM H2, 1 μM H3 and 1 μM H4 with 250 nM T; lane 5, 500 nM H1, 500 nM H2, 1 μM H3 and 1 μM H4. (b–f) AFM images of the assembly products in primary HCR circuit (b), secondary HCR circuit (c), bHCR system in the presence of T (d), and absence of T (e). Part f is enlarged details of part d. Scale bar: 200 nm.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. (a) Fluorescence spectral responses for mixtures of 200 nM H1 and 200 nM H2 (blue); 200 nM F–H1 and 200 nM H2 with 2 nM T (green); 200 nM H1 and 200 nM H2, 200 nM F–H3 and 200 nM H4 (black); 200 nM H1, 200 nM H2, 200 nM F–H3, and 200 nM H4 with 2 nM T (pink); or with 2 nM one-base mismatched T (Mu-T) (red). (b) Fluorescence responses of bHCR system to T of varying concentrations. (c) Calibration curves of fluorescence intensities versus target concentrations. Inset shows the linear relationship between fluorescence intensities and target concentrations in the linear range. (d) Histograms of signal-to-background (STB) ratios of bHCR system (blue) and linear system (red) at different target concentrations.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. Fluorescence images for (a) HeLa cells transfected with H1, H2, F–H3, and H4; (b) C166 cells transfected with H1, H2, and F–H3 H4; (c) HeLa cells transfected with F–H1 and H2. (1) Fluorescence; (2) merged with DIC. Scale bar: 20 μm.

  • References


    This article references 26 other publications.

    1. 1
      Tyagi, S. Nat. Methods 2009, 6, 331 338 DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.1321
    2. 2
      Xia, Y.; Zhang, R.; Wang, Z.; Tian, J.; Chen, X. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 2824 2843 DOI: 10.1039/C6CS00675B
    3. 3
      Tyagi, S.; Kramer, F. R. Nat. Biotechnol. 1996, 14, 303 308 DOI: 10.1038/nbt0396-303
    4. 4
      Qiu, L.; Wu, C.; You, M.; Han, D.; Chen, T.; Zhu, G.; Jiang, J.; Yu, R.; Tan, W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 12952 12955 DOI: 10.1021/ja406252w
    5. 5
      Seferos, D. S.; Giljohann, D. A.; Hill, H. D.; Prigodich, A. E.; Mirkin, C. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 15477 15479 DOI: 10.1021/ja0776529
    6. 6
      Cutler, J. I.; Auyeung, E.; Mirkin, C. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 1376 1391 DOI: 10.1021/ja209351u
    7. 7
      Visvader, J. E. Nature 2011, 469, 314 322 DOI: 10.1038/nature09781
    8. 8
      Zhang, H.; Li, F.; Dever, B.; Li, X.; Le, X. C. Chem. Rev. 2013, 113, 2812 2841 DOI: 10.1021/cr300340p
    9. 9
      Zhao, Y.; Chen, F.; Li, Q.; Wang, L.; Fan, C. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 12491 12545 DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00428
    10. 10
      Dirks, R. M.; Pierce, N. A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2004, 101, 15275 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0407024101
    11. 11
      Bi, S.; Yue, S.; Zhang, S. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 4281 4298 DOI: 10.1039/C7CS00055C
    12. 12
      Chen, Y.; Xu, J.; Su, J.; Xiang, Y.; Yuan, R.; Chai, Y. Anal. Chem. 2012, 84, 7750 7755 DOI: 10.1021/ac3012285
    13. 13
      Cheglakov, Z.; Cronin, T. M.; He, C.; Weizmann, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 6116 6119 DOI: 10.1021/jacs.5b01451
    14. 14
      Jiang, Y.; Li, B.; Milligan, J. N.; Bhadra, S.; Ellington, A. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 7430 DOI: 10.1021/ja4023978
    15. 15
      Zhang, D. Y.; Turberfield, A. J.; Yurke, B.; Winfree, E. Science 2007, 318, 1121 1125 DOI: 10.1126/science.1148532
    16. 16
      Wu, C.; Cansiz, S.; Zhang, L.; Teng, I.; Qiu, L.; Li, J.; Liu, Y.; Zhou, C.; Hu, R.; Zhang, T.; Cui, C.; Cui, L.; Tan, W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 4900 4903 DOI: 10.1021/jacs.5b00542
    17. 17
      Li, L.; Feng, J.; Liu, H.; Li, Q.; Tong, L.; Tang, B. Chem. Sci. 2016, 7, 1940 1945 DOI: 10.1039/C5SC03909F
    18. 18
      Wu, Z.; Liu, G. Q.; Yang, X. L.; Jiang, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 6829 DOI: 10.1021/jacs.5b01778
    19. 19
      Tang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Tang, L.; Yu, R.; Jiang, J. Anal. Chem. 2017, 89, 3445 3451 DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b04312
    20. 20
      Xuan, F.; Hsing, I. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 9810 9813 DOI: 10.1021/ja502904s
    21. 21
      Bi, S.; Chen, M.; Jia, X.; Dong, Y.; Wang, Z. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 8144 8148 DOI: 10.1002/anie.201501457
    22. 22
      Chandran, H.; Rangnekar, A.; Shetty, G.; Schultes, E. A.; Reif, J. H.; LaBean, T. H. Biotechnol. J. 2013, 8, 221 227 DOI: 10.1002/biot.201100499
    23. 23
      Wei, J.; Gong, X.; Wang, Q.; Pan, M.; Liu, X.; Liu, J.; Xia, F.; Wang, F. Chem. Sci. 2018, 9, 52 DOI: 10.1039/C7SC03939E
    24. 24
      Chi, Y.; Wang, X.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, C.; Ertl, H. C.; Zhou, D. Mol. Ther.--Nucleic Acids 2014, 3, e208 DOI: 10.1038/mtna.2014.59
    25. 25
      Peng, X. H.; Cao, Z. H.; Xia, J. T.; Carlson, G. W.; Lewis, M. M.; Wood, W. C.; Yang, L. Cancer Res. 2005, 65, 1909 1917 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-3196
    26. 26
      Yamanaka, K.; Nakahara, T.; Yamauchi, T.; Kita, A.; Takeuchi, M.; Kiyonaga, F.; Kaneko, N.; Sasamata, M. Clin. Cancer Res. 2011, 17, 5423 31 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-3410
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information


    The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.7b04848.

    • Experimental methods including materials and instruments, gel electrophoresis analysis, AFM imaging, fluorescence measurements, cell culture and fluorescence imaging, flow cytometry assay, and RT-PCR assay (PDF)


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.