ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
My Activity
CONTENT TYPES

Phosphorothioated Primers Lead to Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification at Low Temperatures

  • Sheng Cai
    Sheng Cai
    Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Analysis and Drug Metabolism, Zhejiang Province Key Laboratory of Anti-Cancer Drug Research, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310058, China
    More by Sheng Cai
  • Cheulhee Jung
    Cheulhee Jung
    Division of Biotechnology, College of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea
  • Sanchita Bhadra
    Sanchita Bhadra
    Institute for Cellular and Molecular Biology, Department of Molecular Biosciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, United States
  • , and 
  • Andrew D. Ellington*
    Andrew D. Ellington
    Institute for Cellular and Molecular Biology, Department of Molecular Biosciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, United States
    *E-mail: [email protected]
Cite this: Anal. Chem. 2018, 90, 14, 8290–8294
Publication Date (Web):July 3, 2018
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.8b02062
Copyright © 2018 American Chemical Society
  • Free to Read

Article Views

8186

Altmetric

-

Citations

LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICS
PDF (1 MB)
Supporting Info (1)»

Abstract

Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) is an extremely powerful tool for the detection of nucleic acids with high sensitivity and specificity. However, LAMP shows optimal performance at around 65 °C, which limits applications in point-of-care-testing (POCT). Here, we have developed a version of LAMP that uses phosphorothioated primers (PS-LAMP) to enable more efficient hairpin formation and extension at the termini of growing concatamers, and that therefore works at much lower temperatures. By including additional factors such as chaotropes (urea) and single-stranded DNA binding protein (SSB), the sensitivities and selectivities for amplicon detection with PS-LAMP at 40 °C were comparable with a regular LAMP reaction at 65 °C.

This publication is licensed for personal use by The American Chemical Society.

Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) (1) is a rapid and sensitive method for nucleic acid amplification and has numerous applications in molecular diagnostics. (2−7) LAMP is typically carried out at a constant temperature (60–65 °C) (8−12) and can achieve 109-fold amplification within 1 h. A key to the underlying amplification scheme is the use of primers that generate foldback structures and their subsequent extension by a strand-displacing DNA polymerase such as the Bacillus stearothermophilus (Bst) DNA polymerase.
The applicability of LAMP, especially for point-of-care diagnostics, would be greatly improved if it could be performed at lower temperatures; this would potentially reduce both device complexity and power consumption. While there are other isothermal amplification methods that can be carried out at lower temperatures (around 40 °C), such as nucleic acid sequence-based amplification (NASBA), (13) strand displacement amplification (SDA), (14,15) rolling circle amplification (RCA), (16) helicase-dependent amplification (HDA), (17) and recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA), (18) these methods often require additional steps or enzymes relative to LAMP, which requires only a single polymerase. Moreover, these methods have lower specificity for their targets, since they all require only two primers, while LAMP is performed with from four to six specific primers.
In order to lower the operating temperature at which LAMP reactions can be carried out, we exploited a fundamental biophysical principle, that phosphorothioate residues destabilize helices. Boczkowska and co-workers have carried out thermodynamic studies on the stability of duplexes formed between phosphorothioate (PS)-modified ssDNA and complementary phosphodiester (PO)-modified ssDNA, (19) and reported that the PS modifications substantially reduced the melting temperature of PS–PO dsDNA. This in turn allows more breathing at the termini of dsDNA and should promote the formation of foldback hairpins for extension during LAMP. Based on this phenomenon, our lab has previously developed a different amplification method, phosphorothioated-terminal hairpin formation and self-priming extension (PS-THSP), (20) in which the incorporation of phosphorothioate (PS) modifications lead to improved self-folding efficiency of terminal hairpins. (21)
By now incorporating phosphorothioate (PS) modifications into the foldback primers used for LAMP we have created a more generic mechanism (PS-LAMP) for low temperature amplification. PS-LAMP can operate at temperatures as low as 40 °C with sensitivities that are similar to regular LAMP. The PS-terminated DNA should also display enhanced stability against degradation by various nucleases that may be present in biological samples, further enhancing the potential applicability of PS-LAMP for point-of-care (POC) diagnostics.

Results and Discussion

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

Design of PS-LAMP Reactions

In a typical LAMP reaction (Figure 1), there are at least four primers: two inner primers (FIP and BIP) and two outer primers (F3 and B3). These primers are specific to six consecutive blocks of target sequences: B3, B2, B1, F1c, F2c, and F3c (from the 5′-end of the amplicon). Both the inner and outer primers anneal to the target template and are extended simultaneously. The extension of the outer primer with a strand displacing polymerase, such as Bst, therefore displaces the inner primer, which can then fold back on itself to create a dumbbell-shaped amplicon. The inner primers can hybridize to the single-stranded loops in the foldback structures and initiate another round of strand displacement synthesis, forming a concatamer amplicon with a self-priming 3′-hairpin. The ensuing exponential amplification during continuous strand displacement DNA synthesis generates increasingly complex, double-stranded concatamer amplicons. The single-stranded loops in these amplicons can be used to trigger sequence-specific strand exchange reporters, as we have previously described (Figure S1). (22,23) These reporters greatly reduce background signal and provide greater surety in the detection of LAMP amplicons.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Scheme of a phosphorothioated loop-mediated isothermal amplification (PS-LAMP).

The loop structure is key to the amplification mechanism in LAMP reactions. We therefore attempted to improve the formation of the foldback structure in the extended dsDNA (red box) replication intermediate. All the internucleotide linkages in the F1c portion of the FIP primer (20 phosphates for MERS 1a and MERS 1b) and in the B1c portion of the BIP primer (23 and 21 phosphates for MERS 1a and MERS 1b, respectively) were modified with phosphorothioates (see also Figure 1). The F2 region in FIP and the B2 region in BIP were excluded from phosphorothioate modification as this might have reduced priming efficiency. The PS modifications should lead to great reductions in thermal stability at the terminus of the extended dsDNA replication intermediates, (20) and thus intrastrand hybridization (hairpin structure formation) should occur more readily, allowing more efficient exponential amplification and the execution of LAMP at lower reaction temperatures.
To verify that exponential amplification during PS-LAMP is more efficient than during regular LAMP, we compared amplification performance at two different temperatures, 60 and 65 °C). Amplification for LAMP and PS-LAMP was carried out identically except for the primers used and was monitored in real-time using a sequence-specific strand exchange reporter for 150 min in the absence or presence of target template (1.2 × 108 copies). Figure 2a shows that at 60 and 65 °C, LAMP and PS-LAMP could both detect 1.2 × 108 molecules within similar detection times, about 22 min. Interestingly, the fluorescence intensity of the PS-LAMP reaction at 150 min was 1.8 times higher than that of LAMP at 60 °C (Figure 2b). This signal improvement at lower temperatures is consistent with our hypothesis that phosphorothioates improve the self-folding of loops.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Comparison of R-LAMP and PS-LAMP at different temperatures for MERS 1b. (a) Under the same buffer condition, R-LAMP and PS-LAMP were performed at different temperatures (line 1, no template/R-LAMP/65 °C; line 2, 1.2 × 108 copies of template/R-LAMP/65 °C; line 3, no template/PS-LAMP/65 °C; line 4, 1.2 × 108 copies of template/PS-LAMP/65 °C; line 5, no template/R-LAMP/60 °C; line 6, 1.2 × 108 copies of template/R-LAMP/60 °C; line 7, no template/PS-LAMP/60 °C; line 8, 1.2 × 108 copies of template/PS-LAMP/60 °C). (b) Fluorescence intensities at 150 min for R-LAMP and PS-LAMP in the presence of 1.2 × 108 copies of template were compared at different temperatures. (c) R-LAMP and PS-LAMP were performed at 45 °C with an optimized buffer (12 U of Bst 2.0 DNA polymerase, 0.5 μg of ET SSB, and 2 mM of MgSO4).

Optimization of Lower Temperature PS-LAMP Reactions

Given these results, we attempted to further optimize PS-LAMP for even lower temperatures, which would also further its potential use as a point-of-care diagnostic. When PS-LAMP was performed at progressively lower temperatures (60, 55, 50, and 45 °C), no amplification was eventually observed at 45 °C (Figure S2a). The buffer and reaction conditions (4 mM of MgSO4 and 8 U of Bst 2.0 DNA polymerase) were therefore further optimized at 45 °C to see if a signal could be generated. Magnesium ions are known to greatly impact self-folding, (24,25) and thus different concentrations of magnesium (0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 mM) were assessed. At 2 mM MgSO4, a small signal increase was observed (Figure S2b). The amount of Bst 2.0 DNA polymerase was then increased from 8 U to 12 U and a thermostable single-stranded DNA binding protein (ET SSB) was added (0.5 μg) to further destabilize duplexes and promote self-folding at the termini. (26−29) ET SSB proved more effective than an alternative single-stranded DNA binding protein, RecA (Figure S3).
Using the optimized reaction conditions (Figure S4), template amplification by PS-LAMP was possible at 45 °C, while normal LAMP reactions showed no amplification at this temperature (Figure 2c). That said, optimized PS-LAMP at 45 °C still took a longer time (63 min) to come to completion than did a normal LAMP reaction at a higher temperature (65 °C, 22 min).
To further lower the operational temperature of PS-LAMP, urea was added to the reaction mixture. Like heat and phosphorothioates, urea should disrupt base stacking and again improve the possibility of foldback priming. (30−32) Upon optimization, a urea concentration of 1.44 M yielded a workable PS-LAMP reaction at 40 °C (Figure 3a,b). Both urea and low temperatures decrease Bst 2.0 DNA polymerase activity, and thus the amount of Bst 2.0 DNA polymerase in the reaction was optimized once again, as shown in Figure 3c,d, and subsequent reactions contained 60 U of polymerase; higher concentrations (80 U and 120 U) inhibited the reaction. As it is known that the activity of Bst 2.0 DNA polymerase is reduced by about an order of magnitude at 37 °C relative to its activity at 65 °C, we added additional enzyme (60 U rather than 8 U) to the lower temperature reaction. At optimal urea and polymerase concentrations, ET SSB and MgSO4 were reoptimized (0.5 μg and 2 mM, respectively (Figure S5), further decreasing the detection time from approximately 117 to 70 min.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Effects of urea and Bst 2.0 DNA polymerase on PS-LAMP at 40 °C for MERS 1b. Fluorescence intensities were monitored with different amounts of urea (line 1, 0 M/no template; line 2, 0 M/1.2 × 108 copies of template; line 3, 0.48 M/no template; line 4, 0.48 M/1.2 × 108 copies of template; line 5, 0.96 M/no template; line 6, 0.96 M/1.2 × 108 copies of template; line 7, 1.2 M/no template; line 8, 1.2 M/1.2 × 108 copies of template; line 9, 1.44 M/no template; line 10, 1.44 M/1.2 × 108 copies of template) in the buffer (12 U of Bst 2.0 DNA polymerase, 0.5 μg of ET SSB, and 2 mM of MgSO4) (a) or Bst 2.0 DNA polymerase (line 1, 20 U/no template; line 2, 20 U/1.2 × 108 copies of template; line 3, 40 U/no template; line 4, 40 U/1.2 × 108 copies of template; line 5, 60 U/no template; line 6, 60 U/1.2 × 108 copies of template; line 7, 80 U/no template; line 8, 80 U/1.2 × 108 copies of template; line 9, 120 U/no template; line 10, 120 U/1.2 × 108 copies of template) in the buffer (1.44 M of urea, 0.5 μg of ET SSB, and 2 mM of MgSO4) (c) during PS-LAMP at 40 °C. DT values were plotted with the concentrations of urea (b) and units of Bst 2.0 DNA polymerase (d).

Selectivity

To validate the sequence-specificity of PS-LAMP, various nontarget templates (MERS 1a, NRP2 and human genomic DNA) were tested in parallel with the target template (MERS 1b) using a MERS 1b primer set. As indicated in Figure S6, at template concentrations of 500 pg (1.2 × 108 copies) PS-LAMP produced negligible responses with noncognate templates. When the target amplicon (MERS 1b) was mixed with the noncomplementary templates, no diminution in positive signal was observed (Figure S6).

Quantitation by PS-LAMP

The quantitative behavior of PS-LAMP at 40 °C in the presence of urea and under fully optimized conditions was analyzed by monitoring the changes in the fluorescence intensity of the OSD reporter as a function of template concentration. As shown in Figure 4, when plasmids bearing the MERS 1b and MERS 1a genes were used as targets, as few as 4 800 molecules and 12 molecules, respectively, could be successfully detected within 110 and 80 min by PS-LAMP. However, there was slight variability in time-to-detection (Cq, redefined as DT (detection time, min) by multiplying Cq by 3 in this paper) between assays. For instance, DT for 1.2 × 108 template copies ranged from 65 to 85 min between different experiments (see Figures 3c and 4a and Figure S5c). This variability is expected since LAMP is a complex continuous amplification process. Other studies have also reported that LAMP has lower precision and dynamic range of quantitation when compared to quantitative qPCR. (33) As a result, LAMP is not often used for quantitation but rather serves as a sensitive method for detecting nucleic acid analytes. Overall, our PS-LAMP assays performed with reproducible sensitivity and specificity comparable to other reported LAMP assays. The detection of the MERS 1a amplicon was roughly comparable with regular LAMP at 65 °C, but detection of the MERS 1b amplicon with PS-LAMP at 40 °C was less sensitive than for regular LAMP at 65 °C (24 molecules within 30 min) (Figure S7). This is not surprising, as there can be wide variation in the detection limits for different amplicons even with regular LAMP, depending upon the sequences of primers and templates, (4,12,23) and as the PS-LAMP technique is further developed it should be possible to identify comparable optimization rules for amplicon choice and primer design.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Quantitative analysis of PS-LAMP for different templates. The fluorescence intensities were monitored for PS-LAMP at 40 °C in the buffer (1.44 M of urea, 60 U of Bst 2.0 DNA polymerase, 0.5 μg of ET SSB, and 2 mM of MgSO4) with titrated MERS 1b (a) and MERS 1a (b) plasmids.

Conclusions

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

LAMP is an ultrasensitive nucleic acid amplification method that can often detect small numbers DNA or RNA templates within roughly an hour. However, the requirement for high temperatures limits it applicability, and we have therefore relied on a fundamental understanding of nucleic acid hybridization chemistry, the disruption of helical stability by phosphorothioates, to develop PS-LAMP, which shows comparable sensitivities even down to 40 °C. Operating at lower temperatures should inherently reduce device complexity and power consumption when adapting molecular diagnostics to microscale or portable devices.
In addition to being able to operate at more moderate temperatures, PS-LAMP may better enable the use of degenerate primer sets to capture a wider range of phylogenetic variants into amplicons. Improving amplification at lower temperatures will also enable the use of AT-rich primers and probes, which have previously proven problematic for LAMP. (9)
Overall, PS-LAMP may now allow mesothermal amplification and concomitant applications in molecular diagnostics that should be on par with similar techniques, such as RPA. We anticipate that future versions of PS-LAMP may be even more readily adapted to POC devices. While we have used an initial denaturation step of 95 °C, it is also possible to perform LAMP without this step, (34−36) and the application of similar procedures to PS-LAMP would similarly enable a one-step reaction protocol, especially since the reagents used should still allow a modest initial heat pulse of 60 °C. As the technique is further developed, the development of primer design rules that accommodate lower temperatures and phosphorothioates will increase its overall applicability. It may be possible to move reaction temperatures even lower, potentially allowing the body or other nonpowered environments to serve as a heat source for amplification. In addition, the ability to “dial in” amplicon acquisition via the number of phosphorothioates, the amount of urea present, and the temperature of the reaction will provide much greater experimental control over the amplification and detection of specific targets.

Supporting Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b02062.

  • Scheme of one-step strand displacement (OSD); effects of MgSO4, RecA, and ET SSB at different temperatures; selectivity analysis of PS-LAMP for different templates; quantitative analysis of regular LAMP for different templates; and oligonucleotide sequences used in this study (PDF)

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

  • Corresponding Author
    • Andrew D. Ellington - Institute for Cellular and Molecular Biology, Department of Molecular Biosciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, United States Email: [email protected]
  • Authors
    • Sheng Cai - Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Analysis and Drug Metabolism, Zhejiang Province Key Laboratory of Anti-Cancer Drug Research, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310058, China
    • Cheulhee Jung - Division of Biotechnology, College of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Republic of KoreaOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0001-7392-5862
    • Sanchita Bhadra - Institute for Cellular and Molecular Biology, Department of Molecular Biosciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, United States
  • Notes
    The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgments

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

This work was supported by National Aeronautics and Space Administration Astrobiology Institute Cooperative Agreement Notice (NASA NAI CAN) [Grant NNX15AF46G] and Welch [Grant F-1654]. This publication was also made possible through the support of a grant from the John Templeton Foundation [Grant 54466]. The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the John Templeton Foundation. Funding for the open access was provided by the John Templeton Foundation.

References

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

This article references 36 other publications.

  1. 1
    Notomi, T.; Okayama, H.; Masubuchi, H.; Yonekawa, T.; Watanabe, K.; Amino, N.; Hase, T. Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification of DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000, 28 (12), e63e63,  DOI: 10.1093/nar/28.12.e63
  2. 2
    Suwancharoen, D.; Sittiwicheanwong, B.; Wiratsudakul, A. Evaluation of Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification Method (LAMP) for Pathogenic Leptospira Spp. Detection with Leptospires Isolation and Real-Time PCR. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2016, 78 (8), 12991302,  DOI: 10.1292/jvms.15-0702
  3. 3
    Wang, Y.; Li, D.; Wang, Y.; Li, K.; Ye, C. Rapid and Sensitive Detection of Vibrio Parahaemolyticus and Vibrio Vulnificus by Multiple Endonuclease Restriction Real-Time Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification Technique. Molecules 2016, 21 (1), 111,  DOI: 10.3390/molecules21010111
  4. 4
    Abdulmawjood, A.; Wickhorst, J.; Hashim, O.; Sammra, O.; Hassan, A. A.; Alssahen, M.; Lämmler, C.; Prenger-Berninghoff, E.; Klein, G. Application of a Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification (LAMP) Assay for Molecular Identification of Trueperella Pyogenes Isolated from Various Origins. Mol. Cell. Probes 2016, 30 (4), 205210,  DOI: 10.1016/j.mcp.2016.05.003
  5. 5
    Song, J.; Mauk, M. G.; Hackett, B. A.; Cherry, S.; Bau, H. H.; Liu, C. Instrument-Free Point-of-Care Molecular Detection of Zika Virus. Anal. Chem. 2016, 88 (14), 72897294,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b01632
  6. 6
    Kong, X.; Qin, W.; Huang, X.; Kong, F.; Schoen, C. D.; Feng, J.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, H. Development and Application of Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification (LAMP) for Detection of Plasmopara Viticola. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 28935,  DOI: 10.1038/srep28935
  7. 7
    Zhang, C.; Yao, Y.; Zhu, J.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, S.; Wei, H.; Hui, W.; Cui, Y. Establishment and Application of a Real-Time Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification System for the Detection of CYP2C19 Polymorphisms. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 26533,  DOI: 10.1038/srep26533
  8. 8
    Nagamine, K.; Kuzuhara, Y.; Notomi, T. Isolation of Single-Stranded DNA from Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification Products. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2002, 290 (4), 11951198,  DOI: 10.1006/bbrc.2001.6334
  9. 9
    Tomita, N.; Mori, Y.; Kanda, H.; Notomi, T. Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification (LAMP) of Gene Sequences and Simple Visual Detection of Products. Nat. Protoc. 2008, 3 (5), 877882,  DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2008.57
  10. 10
    Nagamine, K.; Hase, T.; Notomi, T. Accelerated Reaction by Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification Using Loop Primers. Mol. Cell. Probes 2002, 16 (3), 223229,  DOI: 10.1006/mcpr.2002.0415
  11. 11
    Mair, G.; Vilei, E. M.; Wade, A.; Frey, J.; Unger, H. Isothermal Loop-Mediated Amplification (Lamp) for Diagnosis of Contagious Bovine Pleuro-Pneumonia. BMC Vet. Res. 2013, 9, 108,  DOI: 10.1186/1746-6148-9-108
  12. 12
    Tanner, N. A.; Zhang, Y.; Evans, T. C. Simultaneous Multiple Target Detection in Real-Time Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification. BioTechniques 2012, 53 (2), 8189,  DOI: 10.2144/0000113902
  13. 13
    Guatelli, J. C.; Whitfield, K. M.; Kwoh, D. Y.; Barringer, K. J.; Richman, D. D.; Gingeras, T. R. Isothermal, in Vitro Amplification of Nucleic Acids by a Multienzyme Reaction Modeled after Retroviral Replication. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1990, 87 (5), 18741878,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.87.5.1874
  14. 14
    Walker, G. T.; Little, M. C.; Nadeau, J. G.; Shank, D. D. Isothermal in Vitro Amplification of DNA by a Restriction Enzyme/DNA Polymerase System. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1992, 89 (1), 392396,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.89.1.392
  15. 15
    Walker, G. T.; Fraiser, M. S.; Schram, J. L.; Little, M. C.; Nadeau, J. G.; Malinowski, D. P. Strand Displacement Amplification–an Isothermal, in Vitro DNA Amplification Technique. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992, 20 (7), 16911696,  DOI: 10.1093/nar/20.7.1691
  16. 16
    Fire, A.; Xu, S. Q. Rolling Replication of Short DNA Circles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1995, 92 (10), 46414645,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.92.10.4641
  17. 17
    Vincent, M.; Xu, Y.; Kong, H. Helicase-Dependent Isothermal DNA Amplification. EMBO Rep. 2004, 5 (8), 795800,  DOI: 10.1038/sj.embor.7400200
  18. 18
    Piepenburg, O.; Williams, C. H.; Stemple, D. L.; Armes, N. A. DNA Detection Using Recombination Proteins. PLoS Biol. 2006, 4 (7), e204,  DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040204
  19. 19
    Boczkowska, M.; Guga, P.; Stec, W. J. Stereodefined Phosphorothioate Analogues of DNA: Relative Thermodynamic Stability of the Model PS-DNA/DNA and PS-DNA/RNA Complexes†. Biochemistry 2002, 41 (41), 1248312487,  DOI: 10.1021/bi026225z
  20. 20
    Jung, C.; Ellington, A. D. A Primerless Molecular Diagnostic: Phosphorothioated-Terminal Hairpin Formation and Self-Priming Extension (PS-THSP). Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2016, 408 (30), 85838591,  DOI: 10.1007/s00216-016-9479-y
  21. 21
    LaPlanche, L. A.; James, T. L.; Powell, C.; Wilson, W. D.; Uznanski, B.; Stec, W. J.; Summers, M. F.; Zon, G. Phosphorothioate-Modified Oligodeoxyribonucleotides. III. NMR and UV Spectroscopic Studies of the Rp-Rp, Sp-Sp, and Rp-Sp Duplexes, [d(GGSAATTCC)]2, Derived from Diastereomeric O-Ethyl Phosphorothioates. Nucleic Acids Res. 1986, 14 (22), 90819093,  DOI: 10.1093/nar/14.22.9081
  22. 22
    Jiang, Y. S.; Bhadra, S.; Li, B.; Wu, Y. R.; Milligan, J. N.; Ellington, A. D. Robust Strand Exchange Reactions for the Sequence-Specific, Real-Time Detection of Nucleic Acid Amplicons. Anal. Chem. 2015, 87 (6), 33143320,  DOI: 10.1021/ac504387c
  23. 23
    Bhadra, S.; Jiang, Y. S.; Kumar, M. R.; Johnson, R. F.; Hensley, L. E.; Ellington, A. D. Real-Time Sequence-Validated Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification Assays for Detection of Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (MERS-CoV). PLoS One 2015, 10 (4), e0123126,  DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123126
  24. 24
    Zahran, M.; Berezniak, T.; Imhof, P.; Smith, J. C. Role of Magnesium Ions in DNA Recognition by the EcoRV Restriction Endonuclease. FEBS Lett. 2011, 585 (17), 27392743,  DOI: 10.1016/j.febslet.2011.07.036
  25. 25
    Sissi, C.; Palumbo, M. Effects of Magnesium and Related Divalent Metal Ions in Topoisomerase Structure and Function. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37 (3), 702711,  DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkp024
  26. 26
    Chang, Y.; Gong, L.; Yuan, W.; Li, X.; Chen, G.; Li, X.; Zhang, Q.; Wu, C. Replication Protein A (RPA1a) Is Required for Meiotic and Somatic DNA Repair But Is Dispensable for DNA Replication and Homologous Recombination in Rice. Plant Physiol. 2009, 151 (4), 21622173,  DOI: 10.1104/pp.109.142877
  27. 27
    Zhu, Z.; Ravelet, C.; Perrier, S.; Guieu, V.; Fiore, E.; Peyrin, E. Single-Stranded DNA Binding Protein-Assisted Fluorescence Polarization Aptamer Assay for Detection of Small Molecules. Anal. Chem. 2012, 84 (16), 72037211,  DOI: 10.1021/ac301552e
  28. 28
    Shlyakhtenko, L. S.; Lushnikov, A. Y.; Miyagi, A.; Lyubchenko, Y. L. Specificity of Binding of Single-Stranded DNA-Binding Protein to Its Target. Biochemistry 2012, 51 (7), 15001509,  DOI: 10.1021/bi201863z
  29. 29
    Rogers, K.; Hobgood, M.; Nance, J.; Cline, D.; Browning, S.; Eason, M.; Eversburg, A.; Lawson, N.; Campbell, L.; Wilhelm, D. Structural Modeling of Gene 32 Protein and SSB’s Roles in DNA Replication, Recombination and Repair. FASEB J. 2010, 24 (1 Supplement), lb48lb48
  30. 30
    Singer, A.; Kuhn, H.; Frank-Kamenetskii, M.; Meller, A. Detection of Urea-Induced Internal Denaturation of DsDNA Using Solid-State Nanopores. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2010, 22 (45), 454111,  DOI: 10.1088/0953-8984/22/45/454111
  31. 31
    Conway, B. E. Effect of Urea on the Viscosity of Deoxyribonucleic Acid Solutions. J. Polym. Sci. 1956, 20 (95), 299306,  DOI: 10.1002/pol.1956.120209506
  32. 32
    Schwinefus, J. J.; Engelsgjerd, S.; Mangold, K.; Thompson, P. Urea Induced DNA Denaturation. Biophys. J. 2013, 104 (2), 425a,  DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2012.11.2364
  33. 33
    Nixon, G. J.; Svenstrup, H. F.; Donald, C. E.; Carder, C.; Stephenson, J. M.; Morris-Jones, S.; Huggett, J. F.; Foy, C. A. A Novel Approach for Evaluating the Performance of Real Time Quantitative Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification-Based Methods. Biomol. Detect. Quantif. 2014, 2, 410,  DOI: 10.1016/j.bdq.2014.11.001
  34. 34
    Tzeling, J. M. W.; Yean, C. Y. A Shelf-Stable Fluorogenic Isothermal Amplification Assay for the Detection of Burkholderia Pseudomallei. Analyst 2016, 141 (4), 12461249,  DOI: 10.1039/C5AN01741F
  35. 35
    Sun, Y.; Quyen, T. L.; Hung, T. Q.; Chin, W. H.; Wolff, A.; Bang, D. D. A Lab-on-a-Chip System with Integrated Sample Preparation and Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification for Rapid and Quantitative Detection of Salmonella Spp. in Food Samples. Lab Chip 2015, 15 (8), 18981904,  DOI: 10.1039/C4LC01459F
  36. 36
    Rane, T. D.; Chen, L.; Zec, H. C.; Wang, T.-H. Microfluidic Continuous Flow Digital Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification (LAMP). Lab Chip 2015, 15 (3), 776782,  DOI: 10.1039/C4LC01158A

Cited By

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

This article is cited by 64 publications.

  1. Yaru Wang, Lanxiang Zhang, Yuqing Shen, Evan Yi-Wen Yu, Xiong Ding. Nested Phosphorothioated Hybrid Primer-Mediated Isothermal Amplification for Specific and Dye-Based Subattomolar Nucleic Acid Detection at Low Temperatures. ACS Sensors 2023, 8 (3) , 1261-1271. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssensors.2c02754
  2. Inyup Paik, Sanchita Bhadra, Andrew D. Ellington. Charge Engineering Improves the Performance of Bst DNA Polymerase Fusions. ACS Synthetic Biology 2022, 11 (4) , 1488-1496. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.1c00559
  3. Yijuan Bao, Yongzhong Jiang, Erhu Xiong, Tian Tian, Zhenzhen Zhang, Jing Lv, Yang Li, Xiaoming Zhou. CUT-LAMP: Contamination-Free Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification Based on the CRISPR/Cas9 Cleavage. ACS Sensors 2020, 5 (4) , 1082-1091. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssensors.0c00034
  4. Marcelino Varona, Derek R. Eitzmann, Darshna Pagariya, Robbyn K. Anand, Jared L. Anderson. Solid-Phase Microextraction Enables Isolation of BRAF V600E Circulating Tumor DNA from Human Plasma for Detection with a Molecular Beacon Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification Assay. Analytical Chemistry 2020, 92 (4) , 3346-3353. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.9b05323
  5. Yue Zhang, Yaqin Chai, Haijun Wang, Ruo Yuan. Target-Induced 3D DNA Network Structure as a Novel Signal Amplifier for Ultrasensitive Electrochemiluminescence Detection of MicroRNAs. Analytical Chemistry 2019, 91 (22) , 14368-14374. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.9b02817
  6. Marcelino Varona, Jared L. Anderson. Visual Detection of Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms Using Molecular Beacon Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification with Centrifuge-Free DNA Extraction. Analytical Chemistry 2019, 91 (11) , 6991-6995. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.9b01762
  7. Hao Yuan, Youchuang Chao, ShanShan Li, Matthew Y. H. Tang, Yue Huang, You Che, Alice S. T. Wong, Tong Zhang, Ho Cheung Shum. Picoinjection-Enabled Multitarget Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification for Detection of Foodborne Pathogens. Analytical Chemistry 2018, 90 (22) , 13173-13177. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.8b03673
  8. Yayun Yang, Nan Zhang, Wei Jiang. Acid-responsive mediated entropy driven signal amplification nanosystem for sensitive imaging of APE1 activity in living cells. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical 2024, 399 , 134858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2023.134858
  9. Liting Zheng, Ge Yang, Irfan Muhammad, Feng Qu. Aptamer-based biosensing detection for exosomes: From selection to aptasensors. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry 2024, 170 , 117422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2023.117422
  10. Guojian Wu, Huimin Qiu, Xin Liu, Pengjie Luo, Yongning Wu, Yizhong Shen. Nanomaterials-based fluorescent assays for pathogenic bacteria in food-related matrices. Trends in Food Science & Technology 2023, 142 , 104214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2023.104214
  11. Khushbu Chauhan, Jin Woo, Woong Jung, Dong-Eun Kim. Poly(ethylene glycol)-Engrafted Graphene Oxide for Gene Delivery and Nucleic Acid Amplification. Materials 2023, 16 (23) , 7434. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16237434
  12. Xudan Shen, Mingcheng Xu, Hechen Wang, Hua Wang, Minzhe Shen, Jadera Talap, Haihong Hu, Su Zeng, Shunxiang Gao, Sheng Cai. Site-specific detection of circulating tumor DNA methylation in biological samples utilizing phosphorothioated primer-based loop-mediated isothermal amplification. Biosensors and Bioelectronics 2023, 237 , 115550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2023.115550
  13. Zhaohui Chu, Jingyi Chen, Jingzi Zhang, Qihui Xie, Fan Zhang, Qingjiang Wang. Detection of Escherichia coli by capillary electrophoresis assisted by large volume sample stacking and nicking endonuclease signal amplification. Journal of Chromatography A 2023, 1706 , 464275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2023.464275
  14. Weihong Yin, Jianjian Zhuang, Jiale Li, Liping Xia, Kai Hu, Juxin Yin, Ying Mu. Digital Recombinase Polymerase Amplification, Digital Loop‐Mediated Isothermal Amplification, and Digital CRISPR‐Cas Assisted Assay: Current Status, Challenges, and Perspectives. Small 2023, 26 https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202303398
  15. Zhen Huang, Christopher J. Lyon, Jin Wang, Shuihua Lu, Tony Y. Hu. CRISPR Assays for Disease Diagnosis: Progress to and Barriers Remaining for Clinical Applications. Advanced Science 2023, 10 (20) https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202301697
  16. Youngung Seok, Michael G. Mauk, Ruijie Li, Cheng Qian. Trends of respiratory virus detection in point-of-care testing: A review. Analytica Chimica Acta 2023, 1264 , 341283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2023.341283
  17. Yuze Lu, Jiayu Yan, Gaozhi Ou, Li Fu. A Review of Recent Progress in Drug Doping and Gene Doping Control Analysis. Molecules 2023, 28 (14) , 5483. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28145483
  18. Sedighe Khaksari, Khalil Abnous, Farzin Hadizadeh, Mohammad Ramezani, Seyed Mohammad Taghdisi, Seyed Ali Mousavi Shaegh. Signal amplification strategies in biosensing of extracellular vesicles (EVs). Talanta 2023, 256 , 124244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2022.124244
  19. Ha Nui Kim, Junmin Lee, Soo-Young Yoon, Woong Sik Jang, Chae Seung Lim. Rapid Detection of Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Using a Novel Point-of-Care BZ TB/NTM NALF Assay: Integrating LAMP and LFIA Technologies. Diagnostics 2023, 13 (8) , 1497. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13081497
  20. Jiaxi Gao, Chunli Yang, Xu Wu, Weixiang Huang, Jingjing Ye, Ruo Yuan, Wenju Xu. A highly sensitive electrochemical biosensor via short-stranded DNA activating LAMP(H+) to regulate i-motif folds for signal transduction. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical 2023, 380 , 133354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2023.133354
  21. Yujie Gao, Shuyang Zhao, Ruxue Zhang, Haimei Li, Mei Li, Bowen Yu, Jinhua Dong. Immunosensor for realtime monitoring of the expression of recombinant proteins during bioprocess. Analytical Biochemistry 2023, 665 , 115069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ab.2023.115069
  22. Jialin Zhang, Ming Zhou, Xin Li, Yaqi Fan, Jinhui Li, Kangqiang Lu, Herui Wen, Jiali Ren. Recent advances of fluorescent sensors for bacteria detection-A review. Talanta 2023, 254 , 124133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2022.124133
  23. Daehan Nam, Seokjoon Kim, Jung Ho Kim, Seungjin Lee, Daneub Kim, Jinseo Son, Doyeon Kim, Byung Seok Cha, Eun Sung Lee, Ki Soo Park. Low-Temperature Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification Operating at Physiological Temperature. Biosensors 2023, 13 (3) , 367. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios13030367
  24. Aatika Sikandar, Luming Jia, Haiyan Wu, Shanshan Yang. Meloidogyne enterolobii risk to agriculture, its present status and future prospective for management. Frontiers in Plant Science 2023, 13 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.1093657
  25. Tyler L Dangerfield, Inyup Paik, Sanchita Bhadra, Kenneth A Johnson, Andrew D Ellington. Kinetics of elementary steps in loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) show that strand invasion during initiation is rate-limiting. Nucleic Acids Research 2023, 51 (1) , 488-499. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkac1221
  26. Jadera Talap, Abdu Ahmed Abdullah AL-maskri, Minzhe Shen, Hui Liu, Xianfeng Jiang, Guizhou Xiao, Lushan Yu, Su Zeng, Cheulhee Jung, Sheng Cai. Ultrasensitive detection of serum miRNA biomarkers related to papillary thyroid cancer using ligation-initiated phosphorothioated primer-based loop-mediated isothermal amplification. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical 2023, 374 , 132785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2022.132785
  27. Suying Zhang, Shenghao Lin, Longjiao Zhu, Zaihui Du, Jiale Li, Lei Wang, Wentao Xu. Novel indicator and stem-loop-primer assisted isothermal amplification for the visual semi-quantitative detection of Toxoplasma gondii. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical 2022, 372 , 132544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2022.132544
  28. Kunling Hu, Wenhua Sun, Ruobing Tang, Boying Zhang, Ran An, Xingguo Liang. Ethanolamine Derivatives Prompt Oxidation-Mediated Cleavage of Phosphorothioated DNA via Redox Control and Competition with Desulphurization. Bulletin of the Chemical Society of Japan 2022, 95 (11) , 1578-1590. https://doi.org/10.1246/bcsj.20220236
  29. Hui Zhou, Hui Shen, Baoting Dou, Qiumei Feng, Xiguang Han, Po Wang. Construction of a sensitive ratiometric electrochemical sensing platform for DNA methylation detection based on the design of multistep DNA amplification circuits. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical 2022, 370 , 132491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2022.132491
  30. Shebin Tharakan, Omair Faqah, Waseem Asghar, Azhar Ilyas. Microfluidic Devices for HIV Diagnosis and Monitoring at Point-of-Care (POC) Settings. Biosensors 2022, 12 (11) , 949. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios12110949
  31. Fan Yang, Wei Wang, Mei Zhang, Wenxin Tao, Youwang Wang, Jiameng Shi, Yuedi Ding, Minhao Xie, Sai Zhang, Zhenqiang Fan, Kai Zhang. CRISPR/Cas12a-mediated electrochemiluminescence platform for environmental and human serum SARS-CoV-2 RNA monitoring using a self-enhanced ruthenium complex linked to zeolitic imidazole framework-8. Environmental Science: Nano 2022, 9 (9) , 3417-3426. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2EN00595F
  32. Noemi Bellassai, Roberta D’Agata, Giuseppe Spoto. Isothermal circular strand displacement–based assay for microRNA detection in liquid biopsy. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry 2022, 414 (22) , 6431-6440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-022-04228-8
  33. Jeong Moon, Jayeon Song, Hyowon Jang, Hyunju Kang, Yong-Min Huh, Hye Young Son, Hyun Wook Rho, Mirae Park, Chandana S. Talwar, Kwang-Hyun Park, Euijeon Woo, Jaewoo Lim, Eun-Kyung Lim, Juyeon Jung, Yongwon Jung, Hyun Gyu Park, Taejoon Kang. Ligation-free isothermal nucleic acid amplification. Biosensors and Bioelectronics 2022, 209 , 114256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2022.114256
  34. Jamin Ku, Khushbu Chauhan, Sang-Hyun Hwang, Yong-Joo Jeong, Dong-Eun Kim. Enhanced Specificity in Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification with Poly(ethylene glycol)-Engrafted Graphene Oxide for Detection of Viral Genes. Biosensors 2022, 12 (8) , 661. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios12080661
  35. Siyuan S. Wang, Erhu Xiong, Sanchita Bhadra, Andrew D. Ellington, . Developing predictive hybridization models for phosphorothioate oligonucleotides using high-resolution melting. PLOS ONE 2022, 17 (5) , e0268575. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268575
  36. Mehrnaz Entesari, Mina Zamani, Mohammad Heidarizadeh, Rasoul Moradi, Fatemeh Khakdan, Fariba Rafiei. An Insight Into Detection Pathways/Biosensors of Highly Infectious Coronaviruses. Molecular Biotechnology 2022, 64 (4) , 339-354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12033-021-00417-5
  37. Haihang Ye, Chance Nowak, Yaning Liu, Yi Li, Tingting Zhang, Leonidas Bleris, Zhenpeng Qin. Plasmonic LAMP: Improving the Detection Specificity and Sensitivity for SARS‐CoV‐2 by Plasmonic Sensing of Isothermally Amplified Nucleic Acids. Small 2022, 18 (12) https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202107832
  38. Xiaolin Wu, Cheryl Chan, Stacy L. Springs, Yie Hou Lee, Timothy K. Lu, Hanry Yu. A warm-start digital CRISPR/Cas-based method for the quantitative detection of nucleic acids. Analytica Chimica Acta 2022, 1196 , 339494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2022.339494
  39. Fang Zhang, Chenshan Gao, Linlin Bai, Yiquan Chen, Shuying Liang, Xucong Lv, Jinyuan Sun, Shaoyun Wang. Dual-color blending based visual LAMP for food allergen detection: A strategy with enlarged color variation range and contrast. Food Chemistry: X 2022, 13 , 100201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fochx.2021.100201
  40. Jiaxi Gao, Chunli Yang, Yumeng Liao, Weixiang Huang, Ruo Yuan, Wenju Xu. A Highly Sensitive Electrochemical Biosensor Via Short-Stranded DNA Activating Lamp(H+) to Regulate I-Motif Folds for Signal Transduction. SSRN Electronic Journal 2022, 139 https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4108474
  41. Jiaxi Gao, Chunli Yang, Yumeng Liao, Weixiang Huang, Ruo Yuan, Wenju Xu. A Highly Sensitive Electrochemical Biosensor Via Short-Stranded DNA Activating Lamp(H+) to Regulate I-Motif Folds for Signal Transduction. SSRN Electronic Journal 2022, 139 https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4188692
  42. Yuyue Xu, Tao Wang, Zhu Chen, Lian Jin, Zuozhong Wu, Jinqu Yan, Xiaoni Zhao, Lei Cai, Yan Deng, Yuan Guo, Song Li, Nongyue He. The point-of-care-testing of nucleic acids by chip, cartridge and paper sensors. Chinese Chemical Letters 2021, 32 (12) , 3675-3686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cclet.2021.06.025
  43. Yujin Jung, Jayeon Song, Hyun Gyu Park. Ultrasensitive nucleic acid detection based on phosphorothioated hairpin-assisted isothermal amplification. Scientific Reports 2021, 11 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-87948-8
  44. Guojun Cao, Jinze Li, Zhifang Xing, Zhiqi Zhang, Wei Zhang, Chuanyu Li, Longhui Li, Zhen Guo, Shuli Li, Xu Gao, Yanchun Ma, Lianqun Zhou, Ming Guan. Establishment of scalable nanoliter digital LAMP technology for the quantitative detection of multiple myeloproliferative neoplasm molecular markers. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical 2021, 346 , 130493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2021.130493
  45. Burcu Özay, Stephanie E McCalla. A review of reaction enhancement strategies for isothermal nucleic acid amplification reactions. Sensors and Actuators Reports 2021, 3 , 100033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snr.2021.100033
  46. Xiong Ding, Kun Yin, Ziyue Li, Maroun M. Sfeir, Changchun Liu. Sensitive quantitative detection of SARS-CoV-2 in clinical samples using digital warm-start CRISPR assay. Biosensors and Bioelectronics 2021, 184 , 113218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2021.113218
  47. Sanchita Bhadra, Timothy E. Riedel, Simren Lakhotia, Nicholas D. Tran, Andrew D. Ellington, . High-Surety Isothermal Amplification and Detection of SARS-CoV-2. mSphere 2021, 6 (3) https://doi.org/10.1128/mSphere.00911-20
  48. Yong Ju, Hyo Yong Kim, Jun Ki Ahn, Hyun Gyu Park. Ultrasensitive version of nucleic acid sequence-based amplification (NASBA) utilizing a nicking and extension chain reaction system. Nanoscale 2021, 13 (24) , 10785-10791. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1NR00564B
  49. A. Cassedy, A. Parle-McDermott, R. O’Kennedy. Virus Detection: A Review of the Current and Emerging Molecular and Immunological Methods. Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences 2021, 8 https://doi.org/10.3389/fmolb.2021.637559
  50. Jayeon Song, Hyo Yong Kim, Soohyun Kim, Yujin Jung, Hyun Gyu Park. Self-priming phosphorothioated hairpin-mediated isothermal amplification. Biosensors and Bioelectronics 2021, 178 , 113051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2021.113051
  51. Chitrangada Das Mukhopadhyay, Pramita Sharma, Koel Sinha, Keshav Rajarshi. Recent trends in analytical and digital techniques for the detection of the SARS-Cov-2. Biophysical Chemistry 2021, 270 , 106538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpc.2020.106538
  52. Wenhai Wang, Qiqin Wang, Hongzhen Xie, Dazhen Wu, Ning Gan. A universal assay strategy for sensitive and simultaneous quantitation of multiplex tumor markers based on the stirring rod-immobilized DNA-LaMnO3 perovskite-metal ions encoded probes. Talanta 2021, 222 , 121456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2020.121456
  53. Ninghao Zhu, Pak Kin Wong. Advances in Viral Diagnostic Technologies for Combating COVID-19 and Future Pandemics. SLAS Technology 2020, 25 (6) , 513-521. https://doi.org/10.1177/2472630320953798
  54. Pranav Kumar Prabhakar, Jyoti Lakhanpal. Recent advances in the nucleic acid-based diagnostic tool for coronavirus. Molecular Biology Reports 2020, 47 (11) , 9033-9041. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-020-05889-3
  55. Ruben R.G. Soares, João C. Varela, Ujjwal Neogi, Sibel Ciftci, Manickam Ashokkumar, Inês F. Pinto, Mats Nilsson, Narayanan Madaboosi, Aman Russom. Sub-attomole detection of HIV-1 using padlock probes and rolling circle amplification combined with microfluidic affinity chromatography. Biosensors and Bioelectronics 2020, 166 , 112442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2020.112442
  56. Abdu Ahmed Abdullah AL-maskri, Jiawei Ye, Jadera Talap, Haihong Hu, Lianli Sun, Lushan Yu, Sheng Cai, Su Zeng. Reverse transcription-based loop-mediated isothermal amplification strategy for real-time miRNA detection with phosphorothioated probes. Analytica Chimica Acta 2020, 1126 , 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2020.06.007
  57. Minzhe Shen, Ying Zhou, Jiawei Ye, Abdu Ahmed Abdullah AL-maskri, Yu Kang, Su Zeng, Sheng Cai. Recent advances and perspectives of nucleic acid detection for coronavirus. Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis 2020, 10 (2) , 97-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpha.2020.02.010
  58. Nathan G. Schoepp, Eric J. Liaw, Alexander Winnett, Emily S. Savela, Omai B. Garner, Rustem F. Ismagilov, . Differential DNA accessibility to polymerase enables 30-minute phenotypic β-lactam antibiotic susceptibility testing of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. PLOS Biology 2020, 18 (3) , e3000652. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000652
  59. Yichen Liu, Baiyang Lu, Yidan Tang, Yan Du, Bingling Li. Real-time gene analysis based on a portable electrochemical microfluidic system. Electrochemistry Communications 2020, 111 , 106665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elecom.2020.106665
  60. Li Zhang, Hanmei Deng, Ruo Yuan, Yali Yuan. Electrochemical lead(II) biosensor by using an ion-dependent split DNAzyme and a template-free DNA extension reaction for signal amplification. Microchimica Acta 2019, 186 (11) https://doi.org/10.1007/s00604-019-3857-z
  61. Qing Dong, Quanyi Liu, Lulu Guo, Dan Li, Xudong Shang, Bingling Li, Yan Du. A signal-flexible gene diagnostic strategy coupling loop-mediated isothermal amplification with hybridization chain reaction. Analytica Chimica Acta 2019, 1079 , 171-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2019.06.048
  62. Xiaoyu Hua, Enfen Yang, Wenting Yang, Ruo Yuan, Wenju Xu. LAMP-generated H + ions-induced dimer i-motif as signal transducer for ultrasensitive electrochemical detection of DNA. Chemical Communications 2019, 55 (83) , 12463-12466. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9CC06738H
  63. Ya Cao, Lingling Li, Bing Han, Ying Wang, Yuhao Dai, Jing Zhao. A catalytic molecule machine-driven biosensing method for amplified electrochemical detection of exosomes. Biosensors and Bioelectronics 2019, 141 , 111397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2019.111397
  64. Di Cheng, Yaping Zhang, Dongxiao Wen, Zhuangzhuang Guo, Huaixia Yang, Yanju Liu, Jinming Kong. Hairpin probes based click polymerization for label-free electrochemical detection of human T-lymphotropic virus types II. Analytica Chimica Acta 2019, 1059 , 86-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2019.01.027
  • Abstract

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. Scheme of a phosphorothioated loop-mediated isothermal amplification (PS-LAMP).

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. Comparison of R-LAMP and PS-LAMP at different temperatures for MERS 1b. (a) Under the same buffer condition, R-LAMP and PS-LAMP were performed at different temperatures (line 1, no template/R-LAMP/65 °C; line 2, 1.2 × 108 copies of template/R-LAMP/65 °C; line 3, no template/PS-LAMP/65 °C; line 4, 1.2 × 108 copies of template/PS-LAMP/65 °C; line 5, no template/R-LAMP/60 °C; line 6, 1.2 × 108 copies of template/R-LAMP/60 °C; line 7, no template/PS-LAMP/60 °C; line 8, 1.2 × 108 copies of template/PS-LAMP/60 °C). (b) Fluorescence intensities at 150 min for R-LAMP and PS-LAMP in the presence of 1.2 × 108 copies of template were compared at different temperatures. (c) R-LAMP and PS-LAMP were performed at 45 °C with an optimized buffer (12 U of Bst 2.0 DNA polymerase, 0.5 μg of ET SSB, and 2 mM of MgSO4).

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. Effects of urea and Bst 2.0 DNA polymerase on PS-LAMP at 40 °C for MERS 1b. Fluorescence intensities were monitored with different amounts of urea (line 1, 0 M/no template; line 2, 0 M/1.2 × 108 copies of template; line 3, 0.48 M/no template; line 4, 0.48 M/1.2 × 108 copies of template; line 5, 0.96 M/no template; line 6, 0.96 M/1.2 × 108 copies of template; line 7, 1.2 M/no template; line 8, 1.2 M/1.2 × 108 copies of template; line 9, 1.44 M/no template; line 10, 1.44 M/1.2 × 108 copies of template) in the buffer (12 U of Bst 2.0 DNA polymerase, 0.5 μg of ET SSB, and 2 mM of MgSO4) (a) or Bst 2.0 DNA polymerase (line 1, 20 U/no template; line 2, 20 U/1.2 × 108 copies of template; line 3, 40 U/no template; line 4, 40 U/1.2 × 108 copies of template; line 5, 60 U/no template; line 6, 60 U/1.2 × 108 copies of template; line 7, 80 U/no template; line 8, 80 U/1.2 × 108 copies of template; line 9, 120 U/no template; line 10, 120 U/1.2 × 108 copies of template) in the buffer (1.44 M of urea, 0.5 μg of ET SSB, and 2 mM of MgSO4) (c) during PS-LAMP at 40 °C. DT values were plotted with the concentrations of urea (b) and units of Bst 2.0 DNA polymerase (d).

    Figure 4

    Figure 4. Quantitative analysis of PS-LAMP for different templates. The fluorescence intensities were monitored for PS-LAMP at 40 °C in the buffer (1.44 M of urea, 60 U of Bst 2.0 DNA polymerase, 0.5 μg of ET SSB, and 2 mM of MgSO4) with titrated MERS 1b (a) and MERS 1a (b) plasmids.

  • References

    ARTICLE SECTIONS
    Jump To

    This article references 36 other publications.

    1. 1
      Notomi, T.; Okayama, H.; Masubuchi, H.; Yonekawa, T.; Watanabe, K.; Amino, N.; Hase, T. Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification of DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000, 28 (12), e63e63,  DOI: 10.1093/nar/28.12.e63
    2. 2
      Suwancharoen, D.; Sittiwicheanwong, B.; Wiratsudakul, A. Evaluation of Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification Method (LAMP) for Pathogenic Leptospira Spp. Detection with Leptospires Isolation and Real-Time PCR. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2016, 78 (8), 12991302,  DOI: 10.1292/jvms.15-0702
    3. 3
      Wang, Y.; Li, D.; Wang, Y.; Li, K.; Ye, C. Rapid and Sensitive Detection of Vibrio Parahaemolyticus and Vibrio Vulnificus by Multiple Endonuclease Restriction Real-Time Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification Technique. Molecules 2016, 21 (1), 111,  DOI: 10.3390/molecules21010111
    4. 4
      Abdulmawjood, A.; Wickhorst, J.; Hashim, O.; Sammra, O.; Hassan, A. A.; Alssahen, M.; Lämmler, C.; Prenger-Berninghoff, E.; Klein, G. Application of a Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification (LAMP) Assay for Molecular Identification of Trueperella Pyogenes Isolated from Various Origins. Mol. Cell. Probes 2016, 30 (4), 205210,  DOI: 10.1016/j.mcp.2016.05.003
    5. 5
      Song, J.; Mauk, M. G.; Hackett, B. A.; Cherry, S.; Bau, H. H.; Liu, C. Instrument-Free Point-of-Care Molecular Detection of Zika Virus. Anal. Chem. 2016, 88 (14), 72897294,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b01632
    6. 6
      Kong, X.; Qin, W.; Huang, X.; Kong, F.; Schoen, C. D.; Feng, J.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, H. Development and Application of Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification (LAMP) for Detection of Plasmopara Viticola. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 28935,  DOI: 10.1038/srep28935
    7. 7
      Zhang, C.; Yao, Y.; Zhu, J.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, S.; Wei, H.; Hui, W.; Cui, Y. Establishment and Application of a Real-Time Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification System for the Detection of CYP2C19 Polymorphisms. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 26533,  DOI: 10.1038/srep26533
    8. 8
      Nagamine, K.; Kuzuhara, Y.; Notomi, T. Isolation of Single-Stranded DNA from Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification Products. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2002, 290 (4), 11951198,  DOI: 10.1006/bbrc.2001.6334
    9. 9
      Tomita, N.; Mori, Y.; Kanda, H.; Notomi, T. Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification (LAMP) of Gene Sequences and Simple Visual Detection of Products. Nat. Protoc. 2008, 3 (5), 877882,  DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2008.57
    10. 10
      Nagamine, K.; Hase, T.; Notomi, T. Accelerated Reaction by Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification Using Loop Primers. Mol. Cell. Probes 2002, 16 (3), 223229,  DOI: 10.1006/mcpr.2002.0415
    11. 11
      Mair, G.; Vilei, E. M.; Wade, A.; Frey, J.; Unger, H. Isothermal Loop-Mediated Amplification (Lamp) for Diagnosis of Contagious Bovine Pleuro-Pneumonia. BMC Vet. Res. 2013, 9, 108,  DOI: 10.1186/1746-6148-9-108
    12. 12
      Tanner, N. A.; Zhang, Y.; Evans, T. C. Simultaneous Multiple Target Detection in Real-Time Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification. BioTechniques 2012, 53 (2), 8189,  DOI: 10.2144/0000113902
    13. 13
      Guatelli, J. C.; Whitfield, K. M.; Kwoh, D. Y.; Barringer, K. J.; Richman, D. D.; Gingeras, T. R. Isothermal, in Vitro Amplification of Nucleic Acids by a Multienzyme Reaction Modeled after Retroviral Replication. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1990, 87 (5), 18741878,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.87.5.1874
    14. 14
      Walker, G. T.; Little, M. C.; Nadeau, J. G.; Shank, D. D. Isothermal in Vitro Amplification of DNA by a Restriction Enzyme/DNA Polymerase System. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1992, 89 (1), 392396,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.89.1.392
    15. 15
      Walker, G. T.; Fraiser, M. S.; Schram, J. L.; Little, M. C.; Nadeau, J. G.; Malinowski, D. P. Strand Displacement Amplification–an Isothermal, in Vitro DNA Amplification Technique. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992, 20 (7), 16911696,  DOI: 10.1093/nar/20.7.1691
    16. 16
      Fire, A.; Xu, S. Q. Rolling Replication of Short DNA Circles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1995, 92 (10), 46414645,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.92.10.4641
    17. 17
      Vincent, M.; Xu, Y.; Kong, H. Helicase-Dependent Isothermal DNA Amplification. EMBO Rep. 2004, 5 (8), 795800,  DOI: 10.1038/sj.embor.7400200
    18. 18
      Piepenburg, O.; Williams, C. H.; Stemple, D. L.; Armes, N. A. DNA Detection Using Recombination Proteins. PLoS Biol. 2006, 4 (7), e204,  DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040204
    19. 19
      Boczkowska, M.; Guga, P.; Stec, W. J. Stereodefined Phosphorothioate Analogues of DNA: Relative Thermodynamic Stability of the Model PS-DNA/DNA and PS-DNA/RNA Complexes†. Biochemistry 2002, 41 (41), 1248312487,  DOI: 10.1021/bi026225z
    20. 20
      Jung, C.; Ellington, A. D. A Primerless Molecular Diagnostic: Phosphorothioated-Terminal Hairpin Formation and Self-Priming Extension (PS-THSP). Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2016, 408 (30), 85838591,  DOI: 10.1007/s00216-016-9479-y
    21. 21
      LaPlanche, L. A.; James, T. L.; Powell, C.; Wilson, W. D.; Uznanski, B.; Stec, W. J.; Summers, M. F.; Zon, G. Phosphorothioate-Modified Oligodeoxyribonucleotides. III. NMR and UV Spectroscopic Studies of the Rp-Rp, Sp-Sp, and Rp-Sp Duplexes, [d(GGSAATTCC)]2, Derived from Diastereomeric O-Ethyl Phosphorothioates. Nucleic Acids Res. 1986, 14 (22), 90819093,  DOI: 10.1093/nar/14.22.9081
    22. 22
      Jiang, Y. S.; Bhadra, S.; Li, B.; Wu, Y. R.; Milligan, J. N.; Ellington, A. D. Robust Strand Exchange Reactions for the Sequence-Specific, Real-Time Detection of Nucleic Acid Amplicons. Anal. Chem. 2015, 87 (6), 33143320,  DOI: 10.1021/ac504387c
    23. 23
      Bhadra, S.; Jiang, Y. S.; Kumar, M. R.; Johnson, R. F.; Hensley, L. E.; Ellington, A. D. Real-Time Sequence-Validated Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification Assays for Detection of Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (MERS-CoV). PLoS One 2015, 10 (4), e0123126,  DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123126
    24. 24
      Zahran, M.; Berezniak, T.; Imhof, P.; Smith, J. C. Role of Magnesium Ions in DNA Recognition by the EcoRV Restriction Endonuclease. FEBS Lett. 2011, 585 (17), 27392743,  DOI: 10.1016/j.febslet.2011.07.036
    25. 25
      Sissi, C.; Palumbo, M. Effects of Magnesium and Related Divalent Metal Ions in Topoisomerase Structure and Function. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37 (3), 702711,  DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkp024
    26. 26
      Chang, Y.; Gong, L.; Yuan, W.; Li, X.; Chen, G.; Li, X.; Zhang, Q.; Wu, C. Replication Protein A (RPA1a) Is Required for Meiotic and Somatic DNA Repair But Is Dispensable for DNA Replication and Homologous Recombination in Rice. Plant Physiol. 2009, 151 (4), 21622173,  DOI: 10.1104/pp.109.142877
    27. 27
      Zhu, Z.; Ravelet, C.; Perrier, S.; Guieu, V.; Fiore, E.; Peyrin, E. Single-Stranded DNA Binding Protein-Assisted Fluorescence Polarization Aptamer Assay for Detection of Small Molecules. Anal. Chem. 2012, 84 (16), 72037211,  DOI: 10.1021/ac301552e
    28. 28
      Shlyakhtenko, L. S.; Lushnikov, A. Y.; Miyagi, A.; Lyubchenko, Y. L. Specificity of Binding of Single-Stranded DNA-Binding Protein to Its Target. Biochemistry 2012, 51 (7), 15001509,  DOI: 10.1021/bi201863z
    29. 29
      Rogers, K.; Hobgood, M.; Nance, J.; Cline, D.; Browning, S.; Eason, M.; Eversburg, A.; Lawson, N.; Campbell, L.; Wilhelm, D. Structural Modeling of Gene 32 Protein and SSB’s Roles in DNA Replication, Recombination and Repair. FASEB J. 2010, 24 (1 Supplement), lb48lb48
    30. 30
      Singer, A.; Kuhn, H.; Frank-Kamenetskii, M.; Meller, A. Detection of Urea-Induced Internal Denaturation of DsDNA Using Solid-State Nanopores. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2010, 22 (45), 454111,  DOI: 10.1088/0953-8984/22/45/454111
    31. 31
      Conway, B. E. Effect of Urea on the Viscosity of Deoxyribonucleic Acid Solutions. J. Polym. Sci. 1956, 20 (95), 299306,  DOI: 10.1002/pol.1956.120209506
    32. 32
      Schwinefus, J. J.; Engelsgjerd, S.; Mangold, K.; Thompson, P. Urea Induced DNA Denaturation. Biophys. J. 2013, 104 (2), 425a,  DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2012.11.2364
    33. 33
      Nixon, G. J.; Svenstrup, H. F.; Donald, C. E.; Carder, C.; Stephenson, J. M.; Morris-Jones, S.; Huggett, J. F.; Foy, C. A. A Novel Approach for Evaluating the Performance of Real Time Quantitative Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification-Based Methods. Biomol. Detect. Quantif. 2014, 2, 410,  DOI: 10.1016/j.bdq.2014.11.001
    34. 34
      Tzeling, J. M. W.; Yean, C. Y. A Shelf-Stable Fluorogenic Isothermal Amplification Assay for the Detection of Burkholderia Pseudomallei. Analyst 2016, 141 (4), 12461249,  DOI: 10.1039/C5AN01741F
    35. 35
      Sun, Y.; Quyen, T. L.; Hung, T. Q.; Chin, W. H.; Wolff, A.; Bang, D. D. A Lab-on-a-Chip System with Integrated Sample Preparation and Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification for Rapid and Quantitative Detection of Salmonella Spp. in Food Samples. Lab Chip 2015, 15 (8), 18981904,  DOI: 10.1039/C4LC01459F
    36. 36
      Rane, T. D.; Chen, L.; Zec, H. C.; Wang, T.-H. Microfluidic Continuous Flow Digital Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification (LAMP). Lab Chip 2015, 15 (3), 776782,  DOI: 10.1039/C4LC01158A
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information

    ARTICLE SECTIONS
    Jump To

    The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b02062.

    • Scheme of one-step strand displacement (OSD); effects of MgSO4, RecA, and ET SSB at different temperatures; selectivity analysis of PS-LAMP for different templates; quantitative analysis of regular LAMP for different templates; and oligonucleotide sequences used in this study (PDF)


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

You’ve supercharged your research process with ACS and Mendeley!

STEP 1:
Click to create an ACS ID

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

MENDELEY PAIRING EXPIRED
Your Mendeley pairing has expired. Please reconnect