ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
Electrogenerated Chemiluminescence for Chronopotentiometric Sensors
My Activity
  • Open Access
Article

Electrogenerated Chemiluminescence for Chronopotentiometric Sensors
Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

  • Wenyue Gao
    Wenyue Gao
    Department of Inorganic and Analytical Chemistry, University of Geneva, Quai Ernest-Ansermet 30, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland
    Department of Chemistry, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China
    More by Wenyue Gao
  • Stéphane Jeanneret
    Stéphane Jeanneret
    Department of Inorganic and Analytical Chemistry, University of Geneva, Quai Ernest-Ansermet 30, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland
  • Dajing Yuan
    Dajing Yuan
    Department of Inorganic and Analytical Chemistry, University of Geneva, Quai Ernest-Ansermet 30, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland
    More by Dajing Yuan
  • Thomas Cherubini
    Thomas Cherubini
    Department of Inorganic and Analytical Chemistry, University of Geneva, Quai Ernest-Ansermet 30, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland
  • Lu Wang
    Lu Wang
    Department of Inorganic and Analytical Chemistry, University of Geneva, Quai Ernest-Ansermet 30, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland
    More by Lu Wang
  • Xiaojiang Xie*
    Xiaojiang Xie
    Department of Chemistry, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China
    *Xiaojiang Xie. E-mail: [email protected]
  • Eric Bakker*
    Eric Bakker
    Department of Inorganic and Analytical Chemistry, University of Geneva, Quai Ernest-Ansermet 30, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland
    *Eric Bakker. E-mail: [email protected]
    More by Eric Bakker
Open PDFSupporting Information (2)

Analytical Chemistry

Cite this: Anal. Chem. 2019, 91, 7, 4889–4895
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.9b00787
Published March 5, 2019

Copyright © 2019 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under

CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 .

Abstract

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

We introduce here a general strategy to read out chronopotentiometric sensors by electrogenerated chemiluminescence (ECL). The potentials generated in chronopotentiometry in a sample compartment are used to control the ECL in a separate detection compartment. A three-electrode cell is used to monitor the concentration changes of the analyte, while the luminol–H2O2 system is responsible for ECL. The principle was shown to be feasible by theoretical simulations, indicating that the sampled times at a chosen potential, rather than traditional transition times, similarly give linear behavior between concentration and the square root of sampled time. With the help of a voltage adapter, the experimental combination between chronopotentiometry and ECL was successfully implemented. As an initial proof of concept, the ferro/ferricyanide redox couple was investigated. The square root of time giving maximum light output changed linearly with ferrocyanide concentration in the range from 0.70 to 4.81 mM. The method was successfully applied to the visual detection of carbonate alkalinity from 0.06 to 0.62 mM using chronopotentiometry at an ionophore-based hydrogen ion-selective membrane electrode. The measurements of carbonate in real samples including river water and commercial mineral water were successfully demonstrated.

This publication is licensed under

CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 .
  • cc licence
  • by licence
  • nc licence
  • nd licence
Copyright © 2019 American Chemical Society
The conversion of electrochemical signals to visual readout is of great significance in analytical science, especially for the development of simple, easy to use and low-cost sensing devices. Not only do the electrochemical detection methods (voltammetry, amperometry, potentiometry, conductometry, and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy) possess the advantages of simplicity, fast responses, and ease of use, but also the instruments needed to perform the analysis can be miniaturized to low-cost microscale dimensions. (1−4) However, electrochemical signals are normally not intuitive and need numerical algorithms to allow for an interpretation of the data. Moreover, electrochemical methods become overly complex when extended to chemical detection in two dimensions and multiple channels. The visualization of chemical changes by means of imaging tools and parallel arrays has great promise for these applications. (5) It is therefore attractive to read out electrochemical signal with optical methods. Liu and Crooks previously developed a microelectrochemical sensing platform realizing such signal transduction through the electrochromic effect. (6) Gooding’s group used similar electrochromic effect to read out potentiometric pH sensor and resistive-based sensors. (7,8) Wang and co-workers contributed a lot to the visualization of electrochemical sensing events based on bipolar electrodes. (9−14) Recently, our group reported on a strategy to convert potentiometric signals to a colorimetric readout through the turnover of a redox indicator in a thin layer using a closed bipolar electrode, (15) although this has not been applied to dynamic electrochemistry protocols such as chronopotentiometry. An electrochemical-to-optical signal transduction scheme was also demonstrated under chronoamperometry control with light-emitting diodes as indicators. (16)
In addition to color change, electrogenerated chemiluminescence (ECL) has also been used to provide a direct optical readout for potentiometric sensors. (17) ECL is an attractive combination of spectroscopic and electrochemical methodologies. It shows great potential for designing portable sensing devices because there is no need for an additional excitation light source and the ECL emission signal can be observed visually or with digital cameras. (18−24) In the above-mentioned work, (17) an ion-selective sensing electrode was placed in a sample physically separated from the ECL detection compartment. It was then treated as the reference electrode in order to modulate the potential at the working electrode used for ECL generation. Because two physically separate compartments were used for sensing and detection, ECL generation is not influenced by the sample composition.
Here, a general strategy is proposed to convert chronopotentiometric signals to ECL readout. In chronopotentiometry, a constant current is applied across the electrochemical cell. The output signal is the cell potential, which changes drastically at the so-called transition time. This transition time is concentration dependent and serves as the analytical signal. The strategy of this work is for the chronopotentiometric experiment to give a light pulse at a time that indicates the analyte concentration. This would be quite easily detectable by a camera or even by the naked eye and be a major advantage compared to intensity-based measurements for field deployable devices.
To achieve this, the time dependent potential change is applied to the detection compartment as voltage input to generate ECL. As luminol is one of the most efficient ECL luminophores, emitting blue light in the presence H2O2, (25−27) it was chosen to generate ECL. The concept is successfully demonstrated with the ferro/ferricyanide redox couple at a conventional glassy carbon electrode and carbonate alkalinity detection at a hydrogen ion-selective electrode (ISE). Theoretical simulations accompany the experimental results. The use of the approach is demonstrated by visual detection of carbonate in river and commercial mineral water samples.

Experimental Section

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Reagents

Potassium tetrakis[3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]borate (KTFPB), tetrakis(4-chlorophenyl)borate tetradodecylammonium salt (ETH 500), chromoionophore I, 2-nitrophenyloctyl ether (o-NPOE), tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane (Tris), potassium ferricyanide, potassium ferrocyanide, acetic acid, sodium acetate, sodium chloride, luminol, hydrogen peroxide solution (35%), hydrochloric acid solution (1 M), and tetrahydrofuran (THF) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. All chemicals were of analytical grade and used without further purification.

Analytical Setup

A double-junction Ag/AgCl reference electrode was used in chronopotentiometric measurements (Mettler-Toledo AG, Schwerzenbach, Switzerland). A platinum electrode with a diameter of 3.0 mm (Metrohm, Switzerland) was used as counter electrode both in chronopotentiometric methods and in ECL measurements. A glassy carbon electrode of 3.0 mm diameter purchased from Metrohm Autolab was used as the working electrode to generate ECL and also used as the working electrode in the ferrocyanide detection system. For ion-selective electrode preparation, electrode bodies (Oesch Sensor Technology, Sargans, Switzerland) were used to mount the ion-selective membranes. Porous polypropylene (PP) membranes (Celgard, 0.237 cm2 surface area, 20 μm thickness) were kindly provided by Membrane Wuppertal, Germany. pH values were determined using a Metrohm 827 pH meter (Metrohm Autolab, Utrecht, The Netherlands).
The electrochemical measurements were performed with an Autolab PGSTAT128N (Metrohm Autolab, Utrecht, The Netherlands) controlled by a personal computer using Nova 2.1.3 software (supplied by Autolab). A panoramic picture of the setup is shown in Figure S1a. The homemade cell used for ECL measurement is shown in Figure S1b. ECL signals were video recorded by a digital camera (Canon EOS 5D Mark III with EF 100 mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM lens) operated in a dark box. The images of the ECL emission were extracted and analyzed by Wolfram Mathematica 11 software. A voltage adapter was designed and fabricated in house (picture shown in Figure S1c). It consists of an amplifier followed by an adder. The user can choose different fixed gains (0.5, 1, 2, 3, 5) and also set the offset (between −1 and +1 V). The adapter circuit uses precision operational amplifiers (TI OPA277) that have low bias current and low offset voltage. They are powered internally using an internal dc/dc converter (XP Power IH0512S) that is followed by linear regulators (ST L7808 and ST L7809) that provides power rails at +8 and −8 V. The gains are set using a rotary encoder that selects precalibrated feedback resistors that permits us to choose the gain. While the offset is selected by a precision 10-turn potentiometer, its value is displayed on a display (TDE Instruments DPM961TG). A second display (TDE Instruments DPM961TG) is provided to read the output value.

Ion-selective Membrane Preparation

The ion-selective membrane for the detection of alkalinity was prepared according to the literature. (28) The cocktail H1 used for the membrane preparation was prepared by dissolving a mixture of 120 mmol/kg of chromoionophore I, 60 mmol/kg of KTFPB, 90 mmol/kg of ETH 500, and 190 mg of o-NPOE in 1 mL of THF. The PP membrane used as supporting material was washed with THF for 10 min. When THF was completely evaporated, an excess volume of 4 μL of the cocktail H1 solution was deposited on the membrane. It was dried overnight at room temperature in a dust-free environment. After conditioning in buffer solution for 40 min, the membrane was mounted in the electrode body. The inner compartment was filled with 10 mM acetic acid/10 mM sodium acetate buffer (1/1) in 100 mM NaCl. All solutions were prepared in 100 mM NaCl as background electrolyte to minimize electrical migration.

Experimental Protocols

Chronopotentiometric experiments were performed in 100 mM NaCl as a background electrolyte with a galvanostatic pulse of 10 s. The potential was recorded as a function of time during the constant current pulse. After each chronopotentiometric determination, an opposite galvanostatic pulse was applied to recover the ferro/ferricyanide redox couple or to regenerate the ionophore-based hydrogen ion-selective membrane for carbonate detection. (29) For the ferrocyanide detection system, a constant current of 30 μA was applied and the dynamic response curves were obtained by adding predefined aliquots of standard solution (0.5 M potassium ferrocyanide solution and 0.5 M potassium ferricyanide solution) to a magnetically stirred background electrolyte. The use of equal amounts of ferricyanide and ferrocyanide maintains a stable starting potential of the system. For the carbonate sensing system, the stock solution was prepared from 1.0 M carbonate and 1.0 M bicarbonate solution, adjusting the pH to 9.6. Calibration curves were obtained by adding precise amounts of carbonate stock solution into the magnetically stirred background electrolyte. Freely dissolved CO2 was removed before measurements using nitrogen gas and a homemade capping seal. (29) Before each galvanostatic pulse, the pH value of the detection solution was measured with a Metrohm pH electrode and pH meter. The precise carbonate concentration was calculated from the pH value and the total carbonate concentration added. The potential generated in chronopotentiometry was output through the electrochemical workstation (Autolab PGSTAT128N) and modulated by the voltage adapter to fit the ECL requirements. The solution used in the ECL emission compartment was composed of 1 mM luminol and 5 mM H2O2 in 0.1 M phosphate buffer solution (pH 11.0).

Results and Discussion

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Figure 1 shows the schematic configuration of the cell that achieves an ECL readout for a chronopotentiometric sensor. In chronopotentiometry, a constant current is applied across the electrochemical cell. The output signal is the cell potential, which changes over time and is applied to the detection compartment as voltage input to generate ECL. As time proceeds, the concentration of the electroactive species at the electrode surface will be depleted at a transition time τ, giving a drastic change in potential. (30−32) According to the Sand equation, the square root of the transition time should be linearly dependent on the concentration of the locally depleted species as follows: (33,34)
(1)
where i is the applied current, cj is the initial concentration of analyte j, n is the number of transferred electrons (for ion-selective membranes, n becomes z, the valency of j), F is the Faraday constant, A is the electrode area, and Dj is the diffusion coefficient of j. The time at which ECL reaches maximum intensity should coincide with the chronopotentiometric transition time, which is achieved with the help of a voltage adapter. In this manner the analyte concentration in the sample compartment may be translated into a time dependent light pulse.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Schematic illustration of the proposed sensing approach converting chronopotentiometric signals in a sample compartment to a timed ECL pulse that can be captured by a camera. A glassy carbon electrode or an ion-selective electrode was used as the working electrode (WE1), platinum counter electrode (CE1), and double-junction Ag/AgCl/3 M KCl/1 M LiOAc reference electrode (RE) were used in chronopotentiometric measurements. In the ECL detection compartment, a glassy carbon electrode was used as the working electrode (WE2) to generate light, and a platinum electrode was used as counter electrode (CE2) to form a closed circuit.

To explain the working principle, a theoretical simulation of chronopotentiometric responses was made with the finite difference method (see the Supporting Information for details). (35) The simulated chronopotentiograms are shown in Figure 2a. The luminol/H2O2 system generates an ECL signal in the potential range from 0.2 to 1.0 V and gives a maximum intensity near 0.46 V on the surface of the glassy carbon electrode. (36−38) We therefore need to evaluate whether the square root of time at a given potential value (τE) still follows a linear relationship with analyte concentration. To test this, the times τE at which the chronopotentiometric responses reached a predefined potential for varying concentrations were extracted. Indeed, as shown in Figure 2b, the square root of τE shows a linear relationship with concentration. Surprisingly, linearity appears to hold even at chosen potentials that are far from the location of the inflection point.

Figure 2

Figure 2. (a) Simulated chronopotentiograms for different analyte concentrations. See the Supporting Information for details. (b) Points extracted at different fixed potential values in (a) and the linear curves between the concentration and the square root of time for each potential (τE).

The linearity observed in Figure 2b suggests that if the ECL output describes a maximum at a predefined potential, the time at which maximum light intensity is recorded may now serve as the analytical signal. To accomplish this, the potential for ECL generation must be adapted to lie within the potential range of the chronopotentiometric response. This was accomplished with the help of a voltage adapter.
As an initial proof of concept, the well-established ferri/ferrocyanide redox couple was investigated. The observed potential changes during a galvanostatic experiment for different concentrations of ferrocyanide are shown in Figure 3a. The concentration of ferrocyanide ions at the electrode surface changes with time, leading to a variation of potential. At the transition time, the depletion of ferrocyanide at the electrode surface occurs and a striking change in potential can be observed. The transition time can be easily observed by taking derivative of each chronopotentiogram, and a precise transition time can be extracted as the maximum of the time derivative of the potential (Figure S2).

Figure 3

Figure 3. Combination of chronopotentiometry (CP) and ECL technique for the determination of ferrocyanide. (a) Potential changes during galvanostatic pulse of 30 μA for varying concentrations of ferrocyanide in 10 mM Tris–HCl buffer solution (pH 7.4) with 100 mM NaCl as background. (b) ECL responses for different concentrations. (The inset shows the change of ECL signals from dark to light and then back to dark.) (c) Linear calibration curves of the square root of the transition time in chronopotentiometry and of the time when ECL intensity reaches the maximum as a function of concentration.

A linear calibration curve between the square root of transition time and concentration is confirmed (Figure 3c). This three-electrode cell was now combined with the ECL detection compartment containing 1 mM luminol and 5 mM hydrogen peroxide. The corresponding ECL responses for different ferrocyanide concentrations are shown in Figure 3b (the video file in the Supporting Information gives the ECL response at a 3.45 mM ferrocyanide concentration as an example). The luminol/H2O2 system tends to give a peak intensity near 0.46 V with a glassy carbon electrode, (36−38) while in the chronopotentiograms for the oxidation of ferrocyanide, the potential was found to change from 0.23 to 1.23 V.
The maximum ECL signal happens to appear near the transition time point. Without additional potential offset, these two systems match well. As the concentration increases, it takes a longer time to observe the transition of the potential and a correspondingly longer time to record peak ECL output. As seen in Figure 3c, a linear relationship was established between the square root of tp and the concentration of analyte, even though tp is strictly not the same transition time as observed in chronopotentiometry. To clearly show the differences, every transition time point in chronopotentiometry and ECL peak time point are marked in the chronopotentiograms (Figure 4a). ECL peaks were observed around the potential of 0.47 V, while the transition time points in chronopotentiometry with increasing concentration vary as a function of the chosen fixed potential. The relationships between the concentration of analyte and the square root of time for given fixed potential values were then visualized in Figure 4b. Consistent with the theoretical predictions, they exhibit a good linearity in the potential range from 0.4 to 0.8 V. Because most curves can be adequately described with the Sand equation, they should be adequate for analytical application to determine concentration. However, they should not be used for fundamental work, for example, to extract diffusion coefficients and electrode surface area, because the slopes and intercepts deviate from that using traditional transition times. The deviation of the slope between traditional chronopotentiometric data and ECL readout can be mainly attributed to the increasing transition potentials in chronopotentiometry with increasing analyte concentration; see Figure 4b. While the two calibration curves are not strictly identical, they are both linear and should allow for a successful translation of transition time measurements to an ECL light pulse, as proposed here.

Figure 4

Figure 4. (a) Traditional transition time points (noted as CP), the corresponding times when ECL intensity reaches a maximum (noted as ECL) for the determination of ferrocyanide (error bars give the potential range when the ECL intensity varies from 95% to 100% of its peak), and the times at a predefined potential value as indicated. (b) Relationships between the ferrocyanide concentration and the square root of the transition time (noted as CP), the times at which ECL gives highest intensity (noted as ECL), and the times for the indicated predefined potential values.

To demonstrate the versatility of this sensing approach, we applied it to the visual detection of carbonate alkalinity. Alkalinity is a critical parameter for evaluating water quality. Bicarbonate and carbonate are the predominant species that determine the alkalinity of environmental samples such as river water and the determination of their concentration is of high significance. Here, WE1 is an ion-selective membrane consisting of a polypropylene-supported liquid membrane doped with a hydrogen ionophore (chromoionophore I), ion exchanger (KTFPB), and lipophilic electrolyte (ETH 500). As introduced in previous work, (28) hydrogen ions expelled galvanostatically from the ion-selective membrane protonate available carbonate base in the diffusion layer via acid–base reaction. With time, the base species becomes depleted owing to the constant imposed hydrogen ion flux from the membrane, and a potential inflection occurs at a transition time τ, which is correlated to the concentration of the base in solution. As above, this potential change was converted to ECL emission signals, giving a light pulse readout for a direct carbonate alkalinity sensor. Figure 5a shows the chronopotentiograms for different concentrations of carbonate at a constant positive current of 20 μA. Transition times are then extracted from the time derivatives of the chronopotentiograms (Figure S3). However, the potential changes here from −0.1 to +0.3 V, which is beyond the potential range for the ECL emission of the luminol/H2O2 system. For this reason, the potential input for ECL was altered by using a voltage adapter. With this compact electronic device, the potential output from chronopotentiometry (U1) may be adjusted as needed and used as input for ECL emission (U2), performed with the formula
(2)
For carbonate detection, the optimum values of a and b were 2 and 0.15 V, respectively, giving light output in the required potential range.

Figure 5

Figure 5. The determination of carbonate alkalinity using an ion-selective membrane electrode. (a) Potential changes with time during galvanostatic pulse of 20 μA for different concentrations of carbonate. (b) ECL responses for different concentrations of carbonate given in millimolar units. (c) Linear calibration curves of the square root of the chronopotentiometric transition time and of the time when ECL intensity reaches its maximum as a function of carbonate concentration.

The normalized ECL intensity versus time profiles for different concentrations of carbonate are shown in Figure 5b. As the concentration of carbonate increases, the time used to observe the ECL peak intensity becomes longer. As above, the square root of this time exhibits a good linear relationship with carbonate concentration (Figure 5c). Similarly, a deviation also exists between the linear calibration curves of chronopotentiometric method and electrochemiluminescent results. Good linear relationships between the square root of time and concentration of the analyte were obtained at any chosen potential value in the range from 0.15 to 0.25 V (Figure 6), which is again in agreement with theoretical expectations. This finding is welcome and confirms the practical applicability of the method. Yet, it is not entirely expected because ECL intensity is known to depend not only on the applied potential but also on the rate of the potential change, (39,40) which tends to vary with concentration (Figure 5a).

Figure 6

Figure 6. (a) The transition times (noted as CP), the corresponding times for which ECL intensity reaches its maximum (noted as ECL; error bars indicate the potential change for which ECL intensity is within 5% of its peak), and the times for fixed potential values (0.10 V, 0.15 V, 0.20 V and 0.25 V) in chronopotentiometry. (b) The relationships between the concentration of carbonate and the square root of the transition time (noted as CP), the time at which ECL reaches its peak (noted as ECL), and the time for a fixed potential in chronopotentiometry.

The sensing mode was applied to the determination of carbonate in environmental samples from the Arve River in Geneva and commercial Evian mineral water. The total carbonate concentration (ctot) in the samples is obtained from the carbonate concentration and the pH value of the detection solution (which is adjusted to about 9.6 in measurements). The carbonate species in the sample including carbonate (CO32–), bicarbonate (HCO3), and carbonic acid (H2CO3) can be calculated according to the following distribution equations (where δ represents the distribution fraction of carbonate speciation and Ka1 and Ka2 are the dissociation constant of H2CO3 and HCO3, respectively).
(3)
(4)
(5)
The same sample was measured using an acidimetric titration as a reference method, using phenolphthalein and bromocresol green as indicators. The results shown in Table 1 demonstrate that our visual detection method gives good quantitative agreement with the chronopotentiometric results and the standard titration method.
Table 1. Visual Carbonate Detection in Real Samples Compared with Different Methods
samplepHctot/mMa[CO32–]/mMb[HCO3]/mMb[H2CO3]/mMbmethod
mineral water7.216.69 ± 0.100.00531 ± 0.000085.82 ± 0.090.861 ± 0.013ISE-ECL
  6.67 ± 0.170.00530 ± 0.000135.81 ± 0.150.859 ± 0.022ISE-CP
  6.85 ± 0.050.00544 ± 0.000045.96 ± 0.040.882 ± 0.006titration
river water8.282.88 ± 0.100.0302 ± 0.00102.81 ± 0.100.0354 ± 0.0012ISE-ECL
  2.87 ± 0.140.0301 ± 0.00142.80 ± 0.140.0353 ± 0.0017ISE-CP
  2.78 ± 0.030.0291 ± 0.00032.72 ± 0.030.0342 ± 0.0004titration
a

Experimental values.

b

Calculated from the distribution equations. ISE-ECL means the ECL detection method combined with chronopotentiometry at the ion-selective electrode. ISE-CP means the chronopotentiometric method using ion-selective electrode.

Conclusions

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

We proposed here a general approach to read out chronopotentiometric sensors by a timed light pulse, using an ECL readout. For this purpose, the potential change over time in chronopotentiometric sensors was modulated to generate ECL in a separate detection compartment. The working principle of this method was first established with the help of theoretical simulations under the approximation that ECL peak signals appear at a constant potential. The feasibility of this strategy was then confirmed not only using conventional solid electrode for the determination of ferrous ions but also with ion-selective electrode for the detection of carbonate. Instead of ECL intensity, the time upon which ECL intensity reaches its maximum was measured to reflect the analyte concentration. It chiefly relies on the potential change for ECL generation, avoiding the influence from other interfering parameters on ECL intensity readouts, such as temperature, pH, and concentration change of the detection solution. A timed light pulse is more easily detectable and quantifiable by mobile cameras than the traditional recording of intensities or potentials, which is attractive for field deployable devices as well as sensing arrays.

Supporting Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b00787.

  • Theory for the simulation of chronopotentiometric responses with the finite difference method, pictures of the experimental setup, time derivatives of the chronopotentiograms for the detection of ferrocyanide and carbonate (PDF)

  • Example of ECL response at 3.45 mM ferro/ferricyanide concentration (AVI)

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

  • Corresponding Authors
  • Authors
    • Wenyue Gao - Department of Inorganic and Analytical Chemistry, University of Geneva, Quai Ernest-Ansermet 30, CH-1211 Geneva, SwitzerlandDepartment of Chemistry, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China
    • Stéphane Jeanneret - Department of Inorganic and Analytical Chemistry, University of Geneva, Quai Ernest-Ansermet 30, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland
    • Dajing Yuan - Department of Inorganic and Analytical Chemistry, University of Geneva, Quai Ernest-Ansermet 30, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland
    • Thomas Cherubini - Department of Inorganic and Analytical Chemistry, University of Geneva, Quai Ernest-Ansermet 30, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland
    • Lu Wang - Department of Inorganic and Analytical Chemistry, University of Geneva, Quai Ernest-Ansermet 30, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland
  • Notes
    The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgments

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The authors thank the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21874063) and the Swiss National Science Foundation (200021_175622) for financial support.

References

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article references 40 other publications.

  1. 1
    Schwarz, M. A.; Hauser, P. C. Lab Chip 2001, 1, 16,  DOI: 10.1039/b103795c
  2. 2
    Martı́n, A.; Kim, J.; Kurniawan, J. F.; Sempionatto, J. R.; Moreto, J. R.; Tang, G.; Campbell, A. S.; Shin, A.; Lee, M. Y.; Liu, X.; Wang, J. Epidermal Microfluidic Electrochemical Detection System: Enhanced Sweat Sampling and Metabolite Detection. ACS Sensors 2017, 2 (12), 18601868,  DOI: 10.1021/acssensors.7b00729
  3. 3
    Liana, D. D.; Raguse, B.; Gooding, J. J.; Chow, E. Sensors 2012, 12, 1150511526,  DOI: 10.3390/s120911505
  4. 4
    Kalantar-zadeh, K.; Ha, N.; Ou, J. Z.; Berean, K. J. Ingestible Sensors. ACS Sensors 2017, 2 (4), 468483,  DOI: 10.1021/acssensors.7b00045
  5. 5
    Chow, K.-F.; Mavré, F.; Crooks, J. A.; Chang, B.-Y.; Crooks, R. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 83648365,  DOI: 10.1021/ja902683f
  6. 6
    Liu, H.; Crooks, R. M. Anal. Chem. 2012, 84, 25282532,  DOI: 10.1021/ac203457h
  7. 7
    Liana, D. D.; Raguse, B.; Gooding, J. J.; Chow, E. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 1920119209,  DOI: 10.1021/acsami.5b04941
  8. 8
    Chow, E.; Liana, D. D.; Raguse, B.; Gooding, J. J. Aust. J. Chem. 2017, 70, 979984,  DOI: 10.1071/CH17191
  9. 9
    Zhang, X.; Chen, C.; Yin, J.; Han, Y.; Li, J.; Wang, E. Anal. Chem. 2015, 87, 46124616,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.5b01018
  10. 10
    Zhang, X.; Shang, C.; Gu, W.; Xia, Y.; Li, J.; Wang, E. ChemElectroChem 2016, 3, 383386,  DOI: 10.1002/celc.201500282
  11. 11
    Zhang, X.; Zhang, L.; Zhai, Q.; Gu, W.; Li, J.; Wang, E. Anal. Chem. 2016, 88, 25432547,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b00054
  12. 12
    Xing, H.; Zhang, X.; Zhai, Q.; Li, J.; Wang, E. Anal. Chem. 2017, 89, 38673872,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.7b00246
  13. 13
    Zhai, Q.; Fan, D.; Zhang, X.; Li, J.; Wang, E. NPG Asia Mater. 2017, 9, e421  DOI: 10.1038/am.2017.132
  14. 14
    Zhang, X.; Jing, Y.; Zhai, Q.; Yu, Y.; Xing, H.; Li, J.; Wang, E. Anal. Chem. 2018, 90, 1178011784,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b02838
  15. 15
    Jansod, S.; Cuartero, M.; Cherubini, T.; Bakker, E. Anal. Chem. 2018, 90, 63766379,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b01585
  16. 16
    Zhai, J.; Yang, L.; Du, X.; Xie, X. Anal. Chem. 2018, 90, 1279112795,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b03213
  17. 17
    Crespo, G. A.; Mistlberger, G.; Bakker, E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 205207,  DOI: 10.1021/ja210600k
  18. 18
    Knight, A. W. TrAC, Trends Anal. Chem. 1999, 18, 4762,  DOI: 10.1016/S0165-9936(98)00086-7
  19. 19
    Fahnrich, K. A.; Pravda, M.; Guilbault, G. G. Talanta 2001, 54, 531559,  DOI: 10.1016/S0039-9140(01)00312-5
  20. 20
    Richter, M. M. Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 30033036,  DOI: 10.1021/cr020373d
  21. 21
    Marquette, C. A.; Blum, L. J. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2008, 390, 155168,  DOI: 10.1007/s00216-007-1631-2
  22. 22
    Miao, W. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 25062553,  DOI: 10.1021/cr068083a
  23. 23
    Liu, Z.; Qi, W.; Xu, G. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 31173142,  DOI: 10.1039/C5CS00086F
  24. 24
    Gao, W.; Saqib, M.; Qi, L.; Zhang, W.; Xu, G. Curr. Opin. Electrochem. 2017, 3, 410,  DOI: 10.1016/j.coelec.2017.03.003
  25. 25
    Fähnrich, K. A.; Pravda, M.; Guilbault, G. G. Talanta 2001, 54, 531559,  DOI: 10.1016/S0039-9140(01)00312-5
  26. 26
    Gao, W.; Muzyka, K.; Ma, X.; Lou, B.; Xu, G. Chem. Sci. 2018, 9, 39113916,  DOI: 10.1039/C8SC00410B
  27. 27
    Hu, L.; Xu, G. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39, 32753304,  DOI: 10.1039/b923679c
  28. 28
    Afshar, M. G.; Crespo, G. A.; Xie, X.; Bakker, E. Anal. Chem. 2014, 86, 64616470,  DOI: 10.1021/ac500968c
  29. 29
    Jarolimova, Z.; Crespo, G. A.; Xie, X.; Afshar, M. G.; Pawlak, M.; Bakker, E. Anal. Chem. 2014, 86, 63076314,  DOI: 10.1021/ac5004163
  30. 30
    Delahay, P.; Mattax, C.; Berzins, T. Theory of Voltammetry at Constant Current. IV. Electron Transfer Followed by Chemical Reaction. J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 1954, 76, 53195324,  DOI: 10.1021/ja01650a017
  31. 31
    Gemene, K. L.; Bakker, E. Anal. Chem. 2008, 80, 37433750,  DOI: 10.1021/ac701983x
  32. 32
    Jarolimova, Z.; Crespo, G. A.; Afshar, M. G.; Pawlak, M.; Bakker, E. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2013, 709, 118125,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2013.10.011
  33. 33
    Sand, H. J. S. Philos. Mag. 1901, 1, 4579,  DOI: 10.1080/14786440109462590
  34. 34
    Bard, A. J. Anal. Chem. 1961, 33, 1115,  DOI: 10.1021/ac60169a002
  35. 35
    Yuan, D.; Cuartero, M.; Crespo, G. A.; Bakker, E. Anal. Chem. 2017, 89, 586594,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b03354
  36. 36
    Liu, X.; Qi, W.; Gao, W.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, W.; Gao, Y.; Xu, G. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 1466214665,  DOI: 10.1039/C4CC06633B
  37. 37
    Sakura, S. Anal. Chim. Acta 1992, 262, 4957,  DOI: 10.1016/0003-2670(92)80007-T
  38. 38
    Vitt, J. E.; Johnson, D. C.; Engstrom, R. C. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1991, 138, 16371643,  DOI: 10.1149/1.2085846
  39. 39
    Choi, J.-P.; Bard, A. J. Anal. Chim. Acta 2005, 541, 141148,  DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2004.11.075
  40. 40
    Cui, H.; Zhang, Z. F.; Zou, G. Z.; Lin, X. Q. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2004, 566, 305313,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2003.11.041

Cited By

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!
Citation Statements
Explore this article's citation statements on scite.ai

This article is cited by 36 publications.

  1. Usha Grewal, John G. Ricca, Laiqi Zhang, Md Dulal Hossain Khan, Lyndon M. West, Andrew C. Terentis, Renjie Wang. Ionophore-Based SERS Sensing for Electrolyte Cations. Analytical Chemistry 2024, 96 (44) , 17672-17678. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.4c03733
  2. Hao Ding, Kang Liu, Xinlu Zhao, Bin Su, Dechen Jiang. Thermoelectric Nanofluidics Probing Thermal Heterogeneity inside Single Cells. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2023, 145 (41) , 22433-22441. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.3c06085
  3. Elena Zdrachek, Eric Bakker. Potentiometric Sensing. Analytical Chemistry 2021, 93 (1) , 72-102. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.0c04249
  4. Shiyu Wang, Md. Zakir Hossain, Tao Han, Kazuo Shinozuka, Takaaki Suzuki, Anna Kuwana, Haruo Kobayashi. Avidin–Biotin Technology in Gold Nanoparticle-Decorated Graphene Field Effect Transistors for Detection of Biotinylated Macromolecules with Ultrahigh Sensitivity and Specificity. ACS Omega 2020, 5 (46) , 30037-30046. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.0c04429
  5. Li Deng, Jingying Zhai, Xiaojiang Xie. Chemiluminescent Ion Sensing Platform Based on Ionophores. Analytical Chemistry 2019, 91 (13) , 8638-8643. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.9b02113
  6. Leili Smaeeli, Soroor Sadeghi. Direct electrochemical determination of biotin by nano-modified electro-sensor in human blood serum. Analytical Chemistry Letters 2025, 15 (1) , 18-33. https://doi.org/10.1080/22297928.2025.2458049
  7. Zhe Zhang, Jinhua Liu, Yao Dai, Mingfu Ye, Yudie Sun, Kui Zhang, Jing-Juan Xu. Dual-mode SERS-ECL biosensor for robust detection of circulating miRNAs based on in-situ synthesized probes. Chemical Engineering Journal 2024, 495 , 153607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2024.153607
  8. Ye Peng, Shihzad Shakil, Dajing Yuan, Maoguo Li. Photoelectrochemical conversion for ion-selective electrodes based on CdS semiconductor film. Analytica Chimica Acta 2024, 1318 , 342921. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2024.342921
  9. Xinyao Wang, Tonghao Liu, Rongning Liang, Wei Qin. Maintenance-free antifouling polymeric membrane potentiometric sensors based on self-polishing coatings. The Analyst 2024, 149 (10) , 2855-2863. https://doi.org/10.1039/D4AN00351A
  10. Wenyue Gao, Hongye Yang, Yifei Zhang, Dexin Gao, Chi Wu. A novel and efficient electrochemiluminescence sensing strategy for the determination of trimethylamine oxide in seafood. Talanta 2024, 269 , 125409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2023.125409
  11. Harrison Hao-Tian Tang, Hai-Jie Lu, . A novel electrochemiluminescence biosensing system using photonic crystal as luminescence enhanced substrates for the ultrasensitive detection of food-borne harmful substances. 2024, 119. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3013202
  12. Yifei Zhang, Dexin Gao, Hongye Yang, Wenyue Gao, Chi Wu. A dynamic electrochemiluminescence system for continuous on-line measurements based on potential stepping pulse strategy. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry 2024, 952 , 117958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2023.117958
  13. Ke Qu, Jinghong Li. Emerging functional materials in solid-contact potentiometric sensing, a field full of vitality. Materials Chemistry Frontiers 2023, 7 (19) , 4177-4183. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3QM00535F
  14. Tingting Han, Tao Song, Yu Bao, Wei Wang, Ying He, Zhenbang Liu, Shiyu Gan, Dongxue Han, Johan Bobacka, Li Niu. Fast and sensitive coulometric signal transduction for ion-selective electrodes by utilizing a two-compartment cell. Talanta 2023, 262 , 124623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2023.124623
  15. Tingting Han, Tao Song, Shiyu Gan, Dongxue Han, Johan Bobacka, Li Niu, Ari Ivaska. Coulometric Response of H + ‐Selective Solid‐Contact Ion‐Selective Electrodes and Its Application in Flexible Sensors †. Chinese Journal of Chemistry 2023, 41 (2) , 207-213. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjoc.202200500
  16. Tanji Yin, Xiaotong Sun, Zhibo Liao, Ziping Zhang. Colorimetric and coulometric dual-mode sensing based on electrochromic Prussian blue device for solid-contact ion-selective electrodes. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical 2022, 371 , 132502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2022.132502
  17. Mingjing Wang, Yufei Wu, Fangxu Lou, Wenwei Cui, Dan Chen, Xiaoqian Zhang, Daobin Jin, Xu Hun. Photoelectrochemical signal for anion and cation detections with photoactive material. Applied Nanoscience 2022, 12 (10) , 2987-2995. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13204-022-02591-7
  18. Tingting Han, Tao Song, Yu Bao, Zhonghui Sun, Yingming Ma, Ying He, Shiyu Gan, Dechen Jiang, Dongxue Han, Johan Bobacka, Li Niu. Amperometric response of solid-contact ion-selective electrodes utilizing a two-compartment cell and a redox couple in solution. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry 2022, 922 , 116683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2022.116683
  19. Kelly Brown, Rowan S. Blake, Lynn Dennany. Electrochemiluminescence within veterinary Science: A review. Bioelectrochemistry 2022, 146 , 108156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioelechem.2022.108156
  20. Jingying Zhai, Dajing Yuan, Xiaojiang Xie. Ionophore-based ion-selective electrodes: signal transduction and amplification from potentiometry. Sensors & Diagnostics 2022, 1 (2) , 213-221. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1SD00055A
  21. Xueqing Gao, Tianjia Jiang, Wei Qin. Potentiometric aptasensing of Escherichia coli based on electrogenerated chemiluminescence as a highly sensitive readout. Biosensors and Bioelectronics 2022, 200 , 113923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2021.113923
  22. Xiaotong Sun, Tanji Yin, Ziping Zhang, Wei Qin. Redox probe-based amperometric sensing for solid-contact ion-selective electrodes. Talanta 2022, 239 , 123114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2021.123114
  23. Yinghong Tang, Jingying Zhai, Qinghan Chen, Xiaojiang Xie. Ruthenium bipyridine complexes as electrochemiluminescent transducers for ionophore-based ion-selective detection. The Analyst 2021, 146 (22) , 6955-6959. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1AN01355F
  24. Justyna Kalisz, Katarzyna Węgrzyn, Krzysztof Maksymiuk, Agata Michalska. Fluorimetric Readout of Ion Selective Electrode Signals Operating under Chronopotentiometric Conditions. ChemElectroChem 2021, 8 (21) , 4129-4134. https://doi.org/10.1002/celc.202100884
  25. Kelly Brown, Lynn Dennany. Assessment of [Ru(bpy)2]3+and [Os(diars)2(bthp)]2+ for the electrochemiluminescence detection of gemcitabine and leucovorin toward diagnostic point-of-care sensors within precision medicine. Sensors and Actuators Reports 2021, 3 , 100065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snr.2021.100065
  26. Tanji Yin, Hemin Wang, Jinghui Li, Baiqing Yuan, Wei Qin. Translating potentiometric detection into non-enzymatic amperometric measurement of H2O2. Talanta 2021, 232 , 122489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2021.122489
  27. Emre Dokuzparmak, Kelly Brown, Lynn Dennany. Electrochemiluminescent screening for methamphetamine metabolites. The Analyst 2021, 146 (10) , 3336-3345. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1AN00226K
  28. Xinfeng Du, Xiaojiang Xie. Ion-Selective optodes: Alternative approaches for simplified fabrication and signaling. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical 2021, 335 , 129368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2020.129368
  29. Shiyu Wang, Zakir Hossain, Yan Zhao, Tao Han. Graphene FET Biosensor Based on the Avidin–Biotin Technology. 2021, 69-85. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1212-1_5
  30. Jingjing Zhang, Yun Chen, Danjun Fang. Electrochemiluminescence in Luminol-based calcium-selective nanoparticles for the determination of calcium ions. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry 2020, 878 , 114671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2020.114671
  31. Long Li, Ying Li, Wei Qin, Yi Qian. Potentiometric detection of glucose based on oligomerization with a diboronic acid using polycation as an indicator. Analytical Methods 2020, 12 (36) , 4422-4428. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0AY01399D
  32. Yuzhou Shao, Yibin Ying, Jianfeng Ping. Recent advances in solid-contact ion-selective electrodes: functional materials, transduction mechanisms, and development trends. Chemical Society Reviews 2020, 49 (13) , 4405-4465. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9CS00587K
  33. Kelly Brown, Charlotte Jacquet, Julien Biscay, Pamela Allan, Lynn Dennany. Electrochemiluminescent sensors as a screening strategy for psychoactive substances within biological matrices. The Analyst 2020, 145 (12) , 4295-4304. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0AN00846J
  34. Xu Hun, Xiaoli Xiong, Jiawang Ding, Wei Qin. Photoelectric current as a highly sensitive readout for potentiometric sensors. Chemical Communications 2020, 56 (27) , 3879-3882. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0CC00138D
  35. Jiawang Ding, Wei Qin. Recent advances in potentiometric biosensors. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry 2020, 124 , 115803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2019.115803
  36. Jianli Sun, Kang Cui, Li Li, Lina Zhang, Jinghua Yu. Visible-light-driven renewable photoelectrochemical/synchronous visualized sensing platform based on Ni:FeOOH/BiVO4 photoanode and enzymatic cascade amplification for carcinoembryonic antigen detection. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical 2020, 304 , 127301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2019.127301

Analytical Chemistry

Cite this: Anal. Chem. 2019, 91, 7, 4889–4895
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.9b00787
Published March 5, 2019

Copyright © 2019 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under

CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 .

Article Views

1913

Altmetric

-

Citations

Learn about these metrics

Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.

  • Abstract

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. Schematic illustration of the proposed sensing approach converting chronopotentiometric signals in a sample compartment to a timed ECL pulse that can be captured by a camera. A glassy carbon electrode or an ion-selective electrode was used as the working electrode (WE1), platinum counter electrode (CE1), and double-junction Ag/AgCl/3 M KCl/1 M LiOAc reference electrode (RE) were used in chronopotentiometric measurements. In the ECL detection compartment, a glassy carbon electrode was used as the working electrode (WE2) to generate light, and a platinum electrode was used as counter electrode (CE2) to form a closed circuit.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. (a) Simulated chronopotentiograms for different analyte concentrations. See the Supporting Information for details. (b) Points extracted at different fixed potential values in (a) and the linear curves between the concentration and the square root of time for each potential (τE).

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. Combination of chronopotentiometry (CP) and ECL technique for the determination of ferrocyanide. (a) Potential changes during galvanostatic pulse of 30 μA for varying concentrations of ferrocyanide in 10 mM Tris–HCl buffer solution (pH 7.4) with 100 mM NaCl as background. (b) ECL responses for different concentrations. (The inset shows the change of ECL signals from dark to light and then back to dark.) (c) Linear calibration curves of the square root of the transition time in chronopotentiometry and of the time when ECL intensity reaches the maximum as a function of concentration.

    Figure 4

    Figure 4. (a) Traditional transition time points (noted as CP), the corresponding times when ECL intensity reaches a maximum (noted as ECL) for the determination of ferrocyanide (error bars give the potential range when the ECL intensity varies from 95% to 100% of its peak), and the times at a predefined potential value as indicated. (b) Relationships between the ferrocyanide concentration and the square root of the transition time (noted as CP), the times at which ECL gives highest intensity (noted as ECL), and the times for the indicated predefined potential values.

    Figure 5

    Figure 5. The determination of carbonate alkalinity using an ion-selective membrane electrode. (a) Potential changes with time during galvanostatic pulse of 20 μA for different concentrations of carbonate. (b) ECL responses for different concentrations of carbonate given in millimolar units. (c) Linear calibration curves of the square root of the chronopotentiometric transition time and of the time when ECL intensity reaches its maximum as a function of carbonate concentration.

    Figure 6

    Figure 6. (a) The transition times (noted as CP), the corresponding times for which ECL intensity reaches its maximum (noted as ECL; error bars indicate the potential change for which ECL intensity is within 5% of its peak), and the times for fixed potential values (0.10 V, 0.15 V, 0.20 V and 0.25 V) in chronopotentiometry. (b) The relationships between the concentration of carbonate and the square root of the transition time (noted as CP), the time at which ECL reaches its peak (noted as ECL), and the time for a fixed potential in chronopotentiometry.

  • References


    This article references 40 other publications.

    1. 1
      Schwarz, M. A.; Hauser, P. C. Lab Chip 2001, 1, 16,  DOI: 10.1039/b103795c
    2. 2
      Martı́n, A.; Kim, J.; Kurniawan, J. F.; Sempionatto, J. R.; Moreto, J. R.; Tang, G.; Campbell, A. S.; Shin, A.; Lee, M. Y.; Liu, X.; Wang, J. Epidermal Microfluidic Electrochemical Detection System: Enhanced Sweat Sampling and Metabolite Detection. ACS Sensors 2017, 2 (12), 18601868,  DOI: 10.1021/acssensors.7b00729
    3. 3
      Liana, D. D.; Raguse, B.; Gooding, J. J.; Chow, E. Sensors 2012, 12, 1150511526,  DOI: 10.3390/s120911505
    4. 4
      Kalantar-zadeh, K.; Ha, N.; Ou, J. Z.; Berean, K. J. Ingestible Sensors. ACS Sensors 2017, 2 (4), 468483,  DOI: 10.1021/acssensors.7b00045
    5. 5
      Chow, K.-F.; Mavré, F.; Crooks, J. A.; Chang, B.-Y.; Crooks, R. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 83648365,  DOI: 10.1021/ja902683f
    6. 6
      Liu, H.; Crooks, R. M. Anal. Chem. 2012, 84, 25282532,  DOI: 10.1021/ac203457h
    7. 7
      Liana, D. D.; Raguse, B.; Gooding, J. J.; Chow, E. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 1920119209,  DOI: 10.1021/acsami.5b04941
    8. 8
      Chow, E.; Liana, D. D.; Raguse, B.; Gooding, J. J. Aust. J. Chem. 2017, 70, 979984,  DOI: 10.1071/CH17191
    9. 9
      Zhang, X.; Chen, C.; Yin, J.; Han, Y.; Li, J.; Wang, E. Anal. Chem. 2015, 87, 46124616,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.5b01018
    10. 10
      Zhang, X.; Shang, C.; Gu, W.; Xia, Y.; Li, J.; Wang, E. ChemElectroChem 2016, 3, 383386,  DOI: 10.1002/celc.201500282
    11. 11
      Zhang, X.; Zhang, L.; Zhai, Q.; Gu, W.; Li, J.; Wang, E. Anal. Chem. 2016, 88, 25432547,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b00054
    12. 12
      Xing, H.; Zhang, X.; Zhai, Q.; Li, J.; Wang, E. Anal. Chem. 2017, 89, 38673872,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.7b00246
    13. 13
      Zhai, Q.; Fan, D.; Zhang, X.; Li, J.; Wang, E. NPG Asia Mater. 2017, 9, e421  DOI: 10.1038/am.2017.132
    14. 14
      Zhang, X.; Jing, Y.; Zhai, Q.; Yu, Y.; Xing, H.; Li, J.; Wang, E. Anal. Chem. 2018, 90, 1178011784,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b02838
    15. 15
      Jansod, S.; Cuartero, M.; Cherubini, T.; Bakker, E. Anal. Chem. 2018, 90, 63766379,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b01585
    16. 16
      Zhai, J.; Yang, L.; Du, X.; Xie, X. Anal. Chem. 2018, 90, 1279112795,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b03213
    17. 17
      Crespo, G. A.; Mistlberger, G.; Bakker, E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 205207,  DOI: 10.1021/ja210600k
    18. 18
      Knight, A. W. TrAC, Trends Anal. Chem. 1999, 18, 4762,  DOI: 10.1016/S0165-9936(98)00086-7
    19. 19
      Fahnrich, K. A.; Pravda, M.; Guilbault, G. G. Talanta 2001, 54, 531559,  DOI: 10.1016/S0039-9140(01)00312-5
    20. 20
      Richter, M. M. Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 30033036,  DOI: 10.1021/cr020373d
    21. 21
      Marquette, C. A.; Blum, L. J. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2008, 390, 155168,  DOI: 10.1007/s00216-007-1631-2
    22. 22
      Miao, W. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 25062553,  DOI: 10.1021/cr068083a
    23. 23
      Liu, Z.; Qi, W.; Xu, G. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 31173142,  DOI: 10.1039/C5CS00086F
    24. 24
      Gao, W.; Saqib, M.; Qi, L.; Zhang, W.; Xu, G. Curr. Opin. Electrochem. 2017, 3, 410,  DOI: 10.1016/j.coelec.2017.03.003
    25. 25
      Fähnrich, K. A.; Pravda, M.; Guilbault, G. G. Talanta 2001, 54, 531559,  DOI: 10.1016/S0039-9140(01)00312-5
    26. 26
      Gao, W.; Muzyka, K.; Ma, X.; Lou, B.; Xu, G. Chem. Sci. 2018, 9, 39113916,  DOI: 10.1039/C8SC00410B
    27. 27
      Hu, L.; Xu, G. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39, 32753304,  DOI: 10.1039/b923679c
    28. 28
      Afshar, M. G.; Crespo, G. A.; Xie, X.; Bakker, E. Anal. Chem. 2014, 86, 64616470,  DOI: 10.1021/ac500968c
    29. 29
      Jarolimova, Z.; Crespo, G. A.; Xie, X.; Afshar, M. G.; Pawlak, M.; Bakker, E. Anal. Chem. 2014, 86, 63076314,  DOI: 10.1021/ac5004163
    30. 30
      Delahay, P.; Mattax, C.; Berzins, T. Theory of Voltammetry at Constant Current. IV. Electron Transfer Followed by Chemical Reaction. J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 1954, 76, 53195324,  DOI: 10.1021/ja01650a017
    31. 31
      Gemene, K. L.; Bakker, E. Anal. Chem. 2008, 80, 37433750,  DOI: 10.1021/ac701983x
    32. 32
      Jarolimova, Z.; Crespo, G. A.; Afshar, M. G.; Pawlak, M.; Bakker, E. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2013, 709, 118125,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2013.10.011
    33. 33
      Sand, H. J. S. Philos. Mag. 1901, 1, 4579,  DOI: 10.1080/14786440109462590
    34. 34
      Bard, A. J. Anal. Chem. 1961, 33, 1115,  DOI: 10.1021/ac60169a002
    35. 35
      Yuan, D.; Cuartero, M.; Crespo, G. A.; Bakker, E. Anal. Chem. 2017, 89, 586594,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b03354
    36. 36
      Liu, X.; Qi, W.; Gao, W.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, W.; Gao, Y.; Xu, G. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 1466214665,  DOI: 10.1039/C4CC06633B
    37. 37
      Sakura, S. Anal. Chim. Acta 1992, 262, 4957,  DOI: 10.1016/0003-2670(92)80007-T
    38. 38
      Vitt, J. E.; Johnson, D. C.; Engstrom, R. C. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1991, 138, 16371643,  DOI: 10.1149/1.2085846
    39. 39
      Choi, J.-P.; Bard, A. J. Anal. Chim. Acta 2005, 541, 141148,  DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2004.11.075
    40. 40
      Cui, H.; Zhang, Z. F.; Zou, G. Z.; Lin, X. Q. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2004, 566, 305313,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2003.11.041
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information


    The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b00787.

    • Theory for the simulation of chronopotentiometric responses with the finite difference method, pictures of the experimental setup, time derivatives of the chronopotentiograms for the detection of ferrocyanide and carbonate (PDF)

    • Example of ECL response at 3.45 mM ferro/ferricyanide concentration (AVI)


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.