ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
Wearable Potentiometric Ion Patch for On-Body Electrolyte Monitoring in Sweat: Toward a Validation Strategy to Ensure Physiological Relevance
My Activity
  • Open Access
Article

Wearable Potentiometric Ion Patch for On-Body Electrolyte Monitoring in Sweat: Toward a Validation Strategy to Ensure Physiological Relevance
Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

  • Marc Parrilla
    Marc Parrilla
    Department of Chemistry, School of Engineering Science in Chemistry, Biotechnology and Health, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Teknikringen 30, SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden
  • Inmaculada Ortiz-Gómez
    Inmaculada Ortiz-Gómez
    Department of Chemistry, School of Engineering Science in Chemistry, Biotechnology and Health, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Teknikringen 30, SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden
    Department of Analytical Chemistry, Campus Fuentenueva, Faculty of Sciences, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain
  • Rocío Cánovas
    Rocío Cánovas
    Department of Chemistry, School of Engineering Science in Chemistry, Biotechnology and Health, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Teknikringen 30, SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden
  • Alfonso Salinas-Castillo
    Alfonso Salinas-Castillo
    Department of Analytical Chemistry, Campus Fuentenueva, Faculty of Sciences, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain
  • María Cuartero
    María Cuartero
    Department of Chemistry, School of Engineering Science in Chemistry, Biotechnology and Health, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Teknikringen 30, SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden
  • Gastón A. Crespo*
    Gastón A. Crespo
    Department of Chemistry, School of Engineering Science in Chemistry, Biotechnology and Health, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Teknikringen 30, SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden
    *E-mail: [email protected]
Open PDFSupporting Information (1)

Analytical Chemistry

Cite this: Anal. Chem. 2019, 91, 13, 8644–8651
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.9b02126
Published June 3, 2019

Copyright © 2019 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under these Terms of Use.

Abstract

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Herein, the reproducibility and a double validation of on-body measurements provided by new wearable potentiometric ion sensors (WPISs) is presented. Sweat collected during sport practice was first analyzed using the developed device, the pH-meter, and ion chromatography (IC) prior to on-body measurements (off-site validation). Subsequently, the accuracy of on-body measurements accomplished by the WPISs was evaluated by comparison with pH-meter readings and IC after collecting sweat (every 10–12.5 min) during sport practice. The developed device contains sensors for pH, Cl, K+, and Na+ that are embedded in a flexible sampling cell for sweat analysis. The electrode array was fabricated employing MWCNTs (as an ion-to-electron transducer) and stretchable materials that have been exhaustively characterized in terms of analytical performance, presenting Nernstian slopes within the expected physiological range of each ion analyte (Cl, 10–100 mM; K+, 10–10 mM; and Na+, 10–100 mM and pH, 4.5–7.5), drift suitable for midterm exercise practice (0.3 ± 0.2 mV h–1), fast response time, adequate selectivity for sweat measurements, and excellent reversibility. Besides that, the designed sampling cell avoids any sweat contamination and evaporation issues while supplying a passive sweat flow encompassing specifically the individual’s perspiration. The interpretation of ion concentration profiles may permit the identification of personal dynamic patterns in sweat composition while practicing sport.

Copyright © 2019 American Chemical Society
The ability to monitor chemical events in a continuous and periodic manner has become of general interest in many fields, especially in environmental sensing and healthcare. (1) Analytical devices that can be on-bodily worn without disturbing the individual’s status are key players as interfaces between vital chemical events and the digitalization of related observations. (2) Today, these gadgets are actively proposed in the literature in the form of wristbands, textiles and skin patches, among others, (3) giving rise to new opportunities for the digitalization of unique data that was inaccessible before this recent paradigm shift.
The growth experienced in the field of wearable chemical sensors over the past decade is undoubtedly connected to increasing market expectations. (5) Thus, market outlooks predict that the immediate revenue from electronic skin patches will reach $10bn by 2023 and $15bn by 2028. (6) However, these numbers are primarily based on the unquestionable success of physical sensors (i.e., temperature, pressure, and movement) over chemical ones. (6) Considering that the information provided by these two kind of sensors is different while complementary, it is absolutely necessary a breakthrough in wearable chemical sensors by demonstrating reliable operability in real scenarios.
Electrochemical sensors are the most convenient platform to develop wearable chemical sensors as inferred from the large number of scientific contributions. (7) These sensors allow for the monitoring of critical biomarkers, such as biomolecules (e.g., glucose, lactate, and drugs), through amperometric readout and ions (K+ and Na+) using potentiometry. (8) Indeed, the well-established all-solid-state technology offers a broad range of advantages in terms of technical specifications, such as simplicity, miniaturization, and low consumption of resources and power, that are essential toward a potential commercialization.
Regarding the value of the chemical information monitored by electrochemical devices, so-called wearable potentiometric ion sensors (WPISs) may particularly enable unique observations related to applied human physiology and health care by measuring ion levels in sweat (and other biological fluids). (9) From a medical perspective, WPISs are striving to supply data suitable for diagnosis of cystic fibrosis and other diseases that involve electrolyte imbalance disorders. (10,11) These devices are also useful from a fitness perspective, permitting the monitoring of certain indicators of the dehydration status of the individual (through sodium and chloride concentrations), (12) muscle activity (potassium), (13) exercise intensity (ammonium), (14) acid–base equilibria (pH), (15) or muscle strength (magnesium). (16)
Recently, certain reviews in the field of WPISs have reported the key requirements for the development of WPISs toward a successful on-body application. (9) These include (i) fast response time to obtain real-time electrolyte dynamics; (ii) reversibility of the electrode response to detect any fluctuations of the ion analyte as a result of physiological events; (iii) resiliency and stability of the electrode response during the wearability; (17) (iv) appropriate calibration protocol to minimize any possible error in the calculation of the electrolyte concentration (number of points, comparison between pre- and postcalibration, concentration versus activity, possibility of calibration-free sensor, influence of the sweat rate, etc.); (18) (v) the noninvasive nature of the device and sampling strategy; (vi) the provision of a sampling approach (i.e., sampling cell) that allows for obtaining a constant sweat flow without the influence of any evaporation or contamination issue; (19−22) and (vii) proper validation of on-body measurements. Hence, the inappropriate fulfillment of any of the mentioned requirements may lead to important errors in the calculation of the concentration of the tested ions, therefore ending in a mistaken decision-making process by the physician (medical purpose) or coach (fitness perspective) (Figure 1).

Figure 1

Figure 1. Illustration of the research question in this article. Is the on-body data provided by WPISs reliable? What is the proper validation protocol to evaluate reliability of the real-time observations?.

Concerning the validation of on-body measurements, the collection of enough sample volume suitable for later analysis utilizing a standard technique (i.e., ion chromatography (IC) and others) justifies the validation of on-body measurements only at longer sampling times (1 h of monitoring). This has resulted in a lack of validation criteria of the reported data despite the developed devices being promising. (23,24)
We propose herein a new protocol to validate on-body measurements provided by any WPISs. Indeed, we have developed a novel design for pH, Cl, K+, and Na+ detection in sweat and use it as proof-of-concept. It is worth mentioning, that the developed wearable device incorporates a sampling cell for constant sweat flow specifically tailored for an individual’s perspiration while avoiding any evaporation and contamination issues. In the final part of the work, validated on-body data demonstrate the potential of the WPISs in supplying reproducible (n = 3) and reliable data during the monitoring of physical activity of different subjects in a total of 9 on-body tests (T1–T9). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that such deep validation of on-body measurements provided by WPISs as well as its reproducibility is reported.

Experimental Section

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Fabrication of the Electrode Array

Figure 2a illustrates the procedure for the fabrication of the electrode array on a flexible polyurethane (PU) substrate. The electrodes consisted of five circular patterns prepared with stretchable carbon ink (CI-2051, Engineered Conductive Materials, Inc.) that were in turn connected to a serpentine track made of stretchable silver ink (CI-1036, Engineered Conductive Materials, Inc.). The electrodic path was fabricated on the PU substrate with the screen-printing technique (SPR-45 Automated SMT Stencil Printer, DDM Novastar, Inc., USA). Subsequently, the electrodes were modified first with a layer of multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) and thereafter with the selective membrane on top (see Table S1 for the compositions). For more details, the reader should refer to the Supporting Information.

Figure 2

Figure 2. (a) Electrodes before and after functionalization. (b) Images of the electrode array, the sampling cell, and entire wearable device. (c) Sweat flow in the sampling cell once it is attached to the skin. (d) WPISs attached to the skin. ISM = ion-selective membrane.

First, the analytical performances of the selective electrodes were characterized against a commercial Ag/AgCl reference electrode (6.0726.100, Metrohm Nordic, Sweden) when they were immersed in a beaker. The electrodes displayed a Nernstian slope as well as limits of detection (LODs) and linear ranges of responses (LRRs) suitable to detect the selected ions in sweat (Table S1). Interestingly, the expected physiological range for the tested ions during sport monitoring were for chloride 10–100 mM, potassium 3–10 mM, sodium 20–100 mM, and pH 4–7.5. (9) Between-electrode reproducibility (n = 3), response repeatability, medium-term drift, and selectivity were also adequate (Figures S1 and S2 and Tables S2 and S3). Indeed, other sensors already reported in the literature using conventional materials featured similar values (Table S3).
The reference electrode was prepared by modifying the method proposed by Bühlman et al. (25) in order to provide stretchability and durability by avoiding the use of a plasticizer (see the Supporting Information). Figure S3 displays the characterization of the analytical performances of this new reference electrode in terms of membrane composition (Table S4), interferences, medium-term stability, and the influence of light on the electrode response. The optimal condition obtained was the use of a PU without a plasticizer, which exhibits higher stability that is likely explained by the decrease of the leaching of the membrane components. (26)

Implementation of the Electrodes into the Sampling Cell for On-Body Measurements

The electrode array was then coupled to the sampling cell (Figure 2b). A circular collection zone allowed for the eccrine glands to collect sweat, which passively flows through the sensing channel up to the outlet of the sampling cell (Figure 2c) (see the Supporting Information for specific details). For example, as the total volume is 8.8 μL, the collected sweat will begin to flow through the sensing channel after 4.8 min of an individual sweating at a rate of 1 μL cm–2 min–1, which is a typical rate for a midintensity sport in several parts of the body. (27,28) All the zones and channels of the sampling cell have rounded shapes to enhance the homogenization of the sample. (29) The sampling cell is attached to the electrode array by adhesive transfer tape, thereby avoiding any possible leaking of sweat and allowing for an adequate pressure from the eccrine glands (14) (Figure 2d). Finally, the device (electrode array + sampling cell) is attached to the skin for on-body measurements through adhesive transfer tape.

Results and Discussion

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

In Vitro Performance of the WPISs

The analytical performances of the electrode array incorporating all-solid-state sensors for Cl, K+, Na+, and pH, together with the reference electrode, were evaluated in water and artificial sweat before and after the implementation of the sampling cell. Figure S4 depicts the observed individual calibration graphs as well as the carry-over response, which is important for confirming the reversibility of the electrode response. The obtained calibration parameters (Tables S5 and S6) were similar to those displayed using the commercial reference electrode, pointing out the correct functioning of the reference electrode. Thus, the electrodes displayed a reproducible Nernstian slope (−63.0 ± 2.4 mV for Cl, 56.8 ± 2.5 mV for K+, 54.2 ± 1.3 mV for Na+, and 50.1 ± 0.5 mV for H+) within the same LRRs (1–100 mM, Cl; 0.1–100 mM, Na+; 0.1–100 mM, K+; and 4–7.5, pH), which include the physiological ranges expected for these ions in sweat. In addition, the electrodes showed robust response (reversibility) even under different types of mechanical stress. This latter is crucial as any change caused by the sensors’ portability during on-body measurements while practicing any sport activity may lead to important errors in the quantification of the analyte concentration. In this sense, the development of advanced materials with the ability to provide resiliency to the electrode response while maintaining the rest of the analytical performances is being actively explored by many authors. (30,31) In the present work, the entire WPIS device (electrodes + sampling cell) has been engineered with elastomeric materials that confer elasticity while maintaining the analytical characteristics of the potentiometric sensors.
Figure S5 portrays the calibration curves of the developed electrode array under linear stretching (up to 50% elongation) and during the bending effort (up to 80°). Importantly, these resiliency tests largely emulate the mechanical strain that the electrodes may experience during on-body measurements. Although, in some of the cases, it was found that the applied deformation modified the analytical behavior up to 30% (Table S7), this is unlikely to be experienced during on-body tests.

Off-Site Evaluation of the WPISs Performance

The strategy applied for sweat-sampling coupled to the WPISs is one of the major concerns when dealing with the accuracy of on-body sweat analysis. Accordingly, potentiometric sensors must be embedded in a gadget that offers (i) effective sweat renewal encompassed through the individual’s perspiration during sport practice in order to allow for the real-time monitoring of the ion analytes; (ii) no risk of sweat evaporation that leads to biased results towing to the analyte enrichment in the fluid; (iii) no risk of sample contamination; and (iv) compatibility with different sweating rates. (4,9) Regarding this latter requirement, elite athletes usually have high sweat rates (0.7–5.9 μL cm–2 min–1) (28) that may require a larger capacity of the sampling cell in order to negate excessive pressure from the eccrine sweat glands. This may lead to modifications of physiological sweating behavior in the skin zone (e.g., hydromeiosis events), therefore masking the on-body observations. (24,32) In contrast, WPISs for medical diagnostics should involve microfluidic cells with tiny sampling in order to be coupled to lower sweat rates provoked by iontophoresis approaches (198–354 nL cm–2 min–1). (11,33)
The design of the sampling cell (Figure 2b,c) was here conceived to fulfill all the aforementioned necessities. First, the microfluidic cell was 3D-printed with the PU substrate to confer conformability to the gadget for further attachment to the human body. The dimensions of the cell were engineered to provide a constant and passive flow of sweat through the sensing channel while the individual is sweating during sport practice. Hence, it is necessary that the sweat fills in first the collecting zone (volume of 8.8 μL), and then the sensing channel (volume of 12.6 μL) will be able to begin the potentiometric measurements.
The total time needed slightly depends on the sweating rate of the individual. For example, considering active perspiration of the back during midintensity physical activity, a sweating rate close to 1 μL cm–2 min–1 will occur. (24,27) This sweat flow would involve 4.8 min to fill the collection zone and 7 min more to completely fill the sensing zone. After ca. 12 min, a continuous sweat renewal takes place in a passive manner while the subject is sweating (see Figure 2c). This was experimentally confirmed by flowing artificial sweat at 4 μL min–1 by means of a peristaltic pump. This flow rate mimics the sweating rate of 2 μL cm–2 min–1 considering an area of 2 cm2, achieved under extreme conditions during on-body tests. (27)
The sampling cell was additionally designed to isolate the collected sweat from the environment, hence avoiding any evaporation or contamination of sweat during on-body tests. Moreover, the entire device was fixed onto a subject’s skin by means of adhesive transfer tape (3 M 9471LE), which is commonly used for the attachment of wearable sensors to the body. (19,21)
The analytical performance of the WPISs were also evaluated under flow conditions by means of a peristaltic pump. Figure 3a displays the potential response of three pH electrodes when the sample pH was increased by almost one pH unit to assess the response time of the device. A time of 5 min is necessary for the electrodes to sense this change in pH at a flow rate of 4 μL min–1. Indeed, each electrode starts to respond 30 s after the other according to its order along the sensing channel.

Figure 3

Figure 3. (a) Response of three pH electrodes for a pH change from 5.6 to 4.7. Flow rate = 4 μL min–1. Dotted lines indicate the response time. (b) Response of three pH electrodes in a solution of pH 5.6 at 4, 8, and 16 μL min–1. (c) pH calibrations at 4, 8, and 16 μL min–1. (d) WPISs under torsion deformation. Response of a K+ electrode after applying different torsion deformations. (e) Calibrations using WPISs for Cl, Na+, K+, and pH before and after the incorporation of the sampling cell and after on-body measurements. All the calibration curves were accomplished in artificial sweat.

The influence of the flow rate on electrode response was assessed, as sporadic changes in the sweating rate of the individual are expected during the workout. Moreover, the perspiration rate may substantially change with the region of the body. (28) This behavior was studied by measuring the potential of a solution at pH 5.6 while successively increasing and decreasing (4, 8, and 16 μL cm–2 min–1) the flow rate of the pump (Figure 3b). These flow rates were chosen to mimic high sweat rates that may exist in the body during sport practice, e.g., forehead sweat rate of 5.9 ± 3.0 μL cm–2 min–1, (28) which means a flow rate of 16.0 μL min–1 according to the area of the collection zone of the sampling cell developed herein. A negligible change was determined for the potentiometric response under these conditions, manifesting such that the WPISs could be used in any part of the body at any intensity of physical activity. No influence was found for the entire calibration graph (pH 7.5–4.7), maintaining even the response reversibility (Figure 3c). Therefore, the same calibration graph may be suitable for the calculation of pH in sweat despite any change on the perspiration rate.
In this sense, the average of the six calibration graphs presented in Figure 3c obtained at different flow rates and with a carry-over evaluation leads to a slope and intercept of 51.7 ± 0.6 mV pH–1 and 201.5 ± 4.4 mV, respectively. Considering the standard deviations for the calibration parameters, the maximum error expected in the pH calculation is 1–3% considering this curve as one that is universal. This level of error is generally considered acceptable in measurements involving the screening of the physiological status of an individual. (5) Notably, the errors in slope and E0 for the pH sensor were calculated under drastic changes of pH and flow rates. That is, the pH sensor will show uncertainty of 3% at much. But this level of uncertainty will be even lower for on-body measurements, as the sensors were calibrated before and after its portability, see below.
A similar behavior was observed for the Cl, K+, and Na+ electrodes, and therefore, no influence of the perspiration rate on the response of the entire electrode array was detected (as an example, the response of three K+ electrodes are shown in Figure S6). Indeed, even though any influence in the diffusion process of the ion analyte when its activity is changed in the bulk solution (such as solution stirring and flow rate) may affect the response of the potentiometric sensors, (34) this is here unnoticeable based on the very low flow rates.
Figure 3d presents a resiliency test of K+ sensors implemented with the sampling cell (i.e., WPISs only containing K+ sensors) based on applying different torsion strains to the device. The calibration graph did not change under these conditions (slope of 53.7 ± 1.4 mV with an intercept of 67.0 ± 4.9). Besides that, and to confirm that any corporal movement during on-body portability does not affect the electrode response, the electrode array was calibrated for every ion analyte before and after on-body measurements. No changes were observed in the calibration graphs (Figure 3e). Furthermore, the calibration graphs are the same as those obtained in the beaker before the implementation of the sampling cell, which were determined without stirring by immersing the electrodes in separate solutions (Figure 3e). As a result, either of these three calibration graphs (i.e., in the beaker, or in the WPISs before and after the test) can be used to calculate on-body electrolyte concentration.

Validation of the WPISs

As mentioned in the Introduction section, yet, there is not an established protocol for the validation of WPISs, and only some recent papers attempted to perform a few additional measurements to establish its accuracy. (35,36)
Current methods for sweat analysis performed in physiology laboratories related to sport performance consist of collecting sweat during the workout using either the regional absorbent patch method (REG) or whole-body washdown technique (WBW), (13,28) with the subsequent use of different analytical techniques, such as IC, (28) ion-selective electrodes (ISE), (37) or inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), (36) to analyze electrolyte concentration. In principle, it is worthy to base the validation of the WPISs in these approaches. In this sense, we propose a double validation of the WPISs operating first out of the body by pumping the sweat toward the WPIS (off-body validation) and then during on-body measurements, comparing the results with IC and a pH meter.
The protocol employed to convert the profiles of the potentiometric signal observed with the WPISs into ion analyte concentrations is seen in Figure S7. Briefly, raw data (dynamic recording of the electrode potential) is converted into ion activity using the precalibration. Subsequently, the ion concentration is calculated from the activity coefficient, which is determined by the ionic strength of artificial sweat (see the Supporting Information). Importantly, while the direct use of ion concentration in the calibration graph shortens the practical calculations, it is not formally correct and may induce additional errors, as demonstrated in the following.
First, human sweat was collected at different times following the REG method from the back of a subject, as described in the Supporting Information, and the samples were analyzed by the WPISs operating by means of a peristaltic pump (i.e., off-site the body), IC, and the pH meter. Briefly, REG consists of attaching a cotton pad (oval-shaped pads of 85 × 70 mm and circular-shaped pads of 58 mm diameter) on the skin with hydrofilm tape, and after a certain length of time, the pad is detached from the skin, demounted from the tape, and finally centrifuged (5.000 rpm) to extract the sweat. The back of individuals participating in this study was chosen as the local region to fix the WPISs during all the on-body tests to maximize the collected volume (27,28) (10–80 μL, 100–700 μL, and 1–3 mL after 5, 10, and 60 min of sweating, respectively). These ranges may slightly vary between subjects, but still, this volume is enough for analysis with the pH meter or IC after dilution (1:100).
Figure S8 displays the correlation plots for all the tested ions using the off-body validation. As a general trend, samples collected over a short time (5–10 min) exhibited over concentrated values, i.e., concentrations outside of the physiological ranges of K+, Na+, and Cl (delimited with colored squares). However, samples collected over longer times (60 min) were within physiological ranges (see below). In addition, whatever the collection time was, excellent correlations were observed between WPISs and gold standard techniques (Figure S8, Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.97 for Cl, 0.89 for K+, 0.91 for Na+, and 0.94 for pH). This indicates that the overestimation issue is related to how the sample is collected in/from the pad, as the same samples were analyzed with different techniques obtaining similar values.
The second part of the validation comprised the comparison of on-body measurements with the gold standard techniques (IC and pH meter) along an 1-h workout. The WPISs and absorbent pads (3 pads of 85 × 70 mm and/or 58 mm diameter dimensions) were attached to the low and medium back of the subjects to collect enough sample volume during sport practice using a professional bike kept in a static trainer (Figure S9). Importantly, every ion was individually measured through a wearable device comprising three twin electrodes and two reference electrodes (one acting as a reference and the other a regular working electrode). This allowed for evaluating the reproducibility of the developed sensors for the first time, as far as we know, during on-body measurements.
Figure 4a depicts the on-body concentration profiles for Cl, K+, Na+, and pH obtained with independent devices for each ion during an 1-h workout. The reproducibility among the three replicates was additionally evaluated, exhibiting relative standard deviations of 12.5 ± 3.2% for Cl, 11.3 ± 6.1% for Na+, 11.5 ± 2.1 for K+n and 0.9 ± 0.4% for pH (see the dynamic profile of the RSD in Figure S10), which are really appropriate values considering possible variability implied in any kind of in situ measurements. Furthermore, as in the case of the previous off-site validation of the WPISs, the values yielded by IC every 5 or 10 min were always higher than those measured on the body (i.e., Cl > 100 mM, K+ > 8 mM, and Na+ > 100 mM) and rendered of nonphysiological meaning unless the subject experienced unhealthy conditions (see Table S8). Thus, we confirmed the incompatibility of the application of the REG method for short collection times of 5–10 min, as they gave rise to values very different between the IC and the WPISs (ca. 60–300% of difference), and because the values measured with IC were totally outside the ranges expected in healthy volunteers.

Figure 4

Figure 4. (a) Concentration profiles observed with the WPISs during 60 min of a cycling workout. The WPISs contained three twin electrodes for each ion. (b) Validation of K+ on-body measurements. Every ion was measured in a different on-body test (with n = 3). A total number of 5 tests were accomplished, labeled as T1–T5.

Therefore, we modified the REG method (m-REG) to minimize evaporation issues of the sample during its collection and manipulation, which may be the cause for an over concentration of the ion analytes (Figure S9). Briefly, (i) the period of sweat collection was increased to 10–12.5 min; (ii) the absorbent pad was squeezed by means of a syringe immediately after removal from the body rather than the traditional centrifugation process; and (iii) sample dilution (1:100) was then quickly accomplished, and the sample was immediately stored in the fridge (4 °C). This method permitted gathering from 100 to 500 μL of sweat depending on the perspiration rate.
Figure 4b portrays the on-body profile (n = 3) for K+ concentrations with the analysis of the samples obtained from the IC and WPISs additionally operating out of the body (in a flow mode with the peristaltic pump) after sweat sampling employing the new m-REG method (every 12.5 min), and one pad collecting sweat during the entire exercise. Now, all the measurements analyzed with the IC fit within the physiological range of ions and agreed with the on-body profiles. Indeed, this agreement was also observed with the WPISs coupled to the peristaltic pump (Pearson correlation of 0.99, Figure S11a). In addition, the sweat at the outlet of the sampling cell was collected during the on-body test and analyzed in the IC for comparative purposes (DROP). The results were also in line with the on-body profile, K+ concentration of 7.1 mM at 18 min, 4.0mM at 30 min, 5.0 mM at 36 min, 4.1 mM at 38 min, 4.3 mM at 46 min, 4.1 mM at 50 min, and 4.6 mM at 60 min, which correspond to the differences of 17.9, 6, 13.8, 3.7, 1.4, and 18.8%, respectively, calculated from the WPISs and collected drop. An analogous experiment was accomplished for on-body Na+ detection providing the same conclusions (Figure S11b, on-body test T6).
Conveniently, the assessment of the calibration graph in artificial sweat permits the use of coefficient activities for the formal construction of the potentiometric calibration graph used for the final calculation of the concentrations (see Figure S7). Otherwise, either the application of a calibration graph based on concentration rather than activity or the comparison of activity with the concentrations found with other gold standard techniques (i.e., IC) introduced greater error in the observed values (see Table S9 for a comparison between different tests).
Table 1 shows the calculated concentrations during the validation of on-body measurements by comparison with IC and the pH-meter. In addition, the same samples were measured by WPISs operating out of the body (Table S10). Whether the data from the gold standard techniques are considered as the true concentrations in sweat, these differences serve as accuracy in terms of error of the developed WPISs. The error across all the tests was below 16% with an average of 7.9 ± 4.7%, which is acceptable with respect to a reliable decision-making process based on real-time measurements assessed in real scenarios. A proper agreement with the WPISs operating out of the body was also observed (Table S10).
Table 1. Sweat Analysis during On-Body Tests
 period (min)WPISs (mM or pH)a,bIC (mM) or pH meterIC-WPISs difference (%)
K+10–22.56.3 ± 1.45.97.4
22.5–354.9 ± 0.54.215.3
35–47.54.5 ± 0.44.35.9
47.5–604.0 ± 0.44.25.3
10–604.7 ± 0.94.71.4
10–604.7 ± 0.94.62.2
Na+10–22.579.9 ± 10.184.85.8
22.5–3579.7 ± 5.983.74.9
35–47.577.8 ± 6.189.513.1
47.5–6072.4 ± 6.683.513.3
10–6076.9 ± 7.484.99.4
10–6076.9 ± 7.485.19.6
Cl20–3046.0 ± 3.954.615.8
30–4052.7 ± 1.756.26.1
40–5056.7 ± 2.961.98.4
50–6059.1 ± 1.951.614.6
pH20–308.0 ± 0.17.57.3
30–407.9 ± 0.17.64.3
40–507.7 ± 0.17.70.5
50–607.5 ± 0.17.33.0
a

The corresponding experiments are shown in Figure 4b (K+, T5), Figure S11b (Na+, T6), Figure 5b (Cl, subject 1, T8), and Figure 4a (pH, T4).

b

Average corresponding to the entire collection time.

Finally, the WPISs were evaluated under different conditions, (i) Na+ profile of one subject under high physical activity (constant workload at level 7–8 out of 10 exercise intensity) and without any water intake during the practice (on-body test T7), and (ii) Cl and pH profiles of 2 different individuals subjected to the same activity conditions but under hydration conditions (22 °C, 1 h cycling, medium intensity, on-body tests T8 and T9). In the case of the exercise practice without any water intake (Figure 5a), after 45 min of cycling, there was a gradual increase in Na+ concentration that may suggest a dehydration status of the subject, as previously reported. (8,12) However, this information may be carefully interpreted as the observed increase in Na+ may be a consequence of the local increase of skin temperature, change in the exercise intensity or other factors. Therefore, further on-body tests (i.e., massive validation) are needed to confirm this finding and others from a physiological point of view.

Figure 5

Figure 5. (a) Electrolyte dynamics observed during on-body tests. (a) Na+ concentration of an individual subjected to 1-h cycling at high intensity (on-body test T7). (b) Cl and pH monitoring in two different individuals subjected to the same physical activity (22 °C, relative humidity 70%, 1-h cycling, high intensity). The dots indicate the concentrations of sweat analyzed by IC after sweat collection by m-REG. On-body tests T8 and T9.

Regarding the second experiment (Figure 5b), subject 1 had more acidic pH levels, with Cl concentrations within the common healthy range (10–100 mM), while subject 2 showed more basic pH levels and lower Cl concentrations. These differences may be associated with the diet, the fitness condition of each subject, and hydration status. However, the interpretation of these results is far beyond the scope of this work. Overall, these observations encourage the further testing of WPISs in athletes at known physiological conditions to assess the differences in electrolyte dynamics.

Conclusions

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

We have demonstrated, for the first time, the reproducibility and reliability of on-body measurements accomplished by new WPISs for pH, Cl, K+, and Na+ analysis in sweat. The validation of these measurements has been advantageously assessed through a two-step protocol, considering, first, the off-site performance of the WPISs and then on-body operation. All measurements were compared with the results from gold standard techniques, such as IC and a pH meter. The incorporation of an innovative sampling cell additionally permitted the realization of on-body measurements in real time through the provision of a continuous and passive sweat flow encompassing the subjects’ perspiration. Overall, it is here demonstrated, the potential of the developed WPISs for providing reliable physiological and personal data of body status during sports activity. It is expected, that the advances presented in this article will contribute to the appropriate validation of future wearable chemical sensors that will constitute the next generation of digital health solutions for personalized hydration and recovery strategies in sport performance and wellbeing.

Supporting Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b02126.

  • Experimental section, analytical parameters and membrane compositions, and data treatment and validation (PDF)

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

  • Corresponding Author
  • Authors
    • Marc Parrilla - Department of Chemistry, School of Engineering Science in Chemistry, Biotechnology and Health, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Teknikringen 30, SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden
    • Inmaculada Ortiz-Gómez - Department of Chemistry, School of Engineering Science in Chemistry, Biotechnology and Health, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Teknikringen 30, SE-100 44 Stockholm, SwedenDepartment of Analytical Chemistry, Campus Fuentenueva, Faculty of Sciences, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain
    • Rocío Cánovas - Department of Chemistry, School of Engineering Science in Chemistry, Biotechnology and Health, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Teknikringen 30, SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden
    • Alfonso Salinas-Castillo - Department of Analytical Chemistry, Campus Fuentenueva, Faculty of Sciences, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain
    • María Cuartero - Department of Chemistry, School of Engineering Science in Chemistry, Biotechnology and Health, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Teknikringen 30, SE-100 44 Stockholm, SwedenOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-3858-8466
  • Notes
    The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgments

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The authors acknowledge the financial support of the KTH Royal Institute of Technology (K-2017-0371), Swedish Research Council (VR-2017-4887), Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research (GMT14-0071), WPCRN (K-2017-0804 and K-2017-0809), and Metrohm Nordic AB. M.C. is grateful for the financial support of the European Union (H2020-MSCA-IF-2017, Grant 792824). R.C. thanks the Alfonso Martin Escudero Foundation. I.O.G acknowledges the Spanish Research Council (CTQ2016-78754-C2-1-R). Alexander Wiorek and Kequan Xu are acknowledged for the help with the on-body tests.

References

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article references 37 other publications.

  1. 1
    Kim, J.; Campbell, A. S.; de Ávila, B. E.-F.; Wang, J. Wearable Biosensors for Healthcare Monitoring. Nat. Biotechnol. 2019, 37, 389,  DOI: 10.1038/s41587-019-0045-y
  2. 2
    Kaya, T.; Liu, G.; Ho, J.; Yelamarthi, K.; Miller, K.; Edwards, J.; Stannard, A. Wearable Sweat Sensors: Background and Current Trends. Electroanalysis 2019, 31 (3), 411,  DOI: 10.1002/elan.201800677
  3. 3
    Gao, W.; Brooks, G. A.; Klonoff, D. C. Wearable Physiological Systems and Technologies for Metabolic Monitoring. J. Appl. Physiol. 2018, 124, 548556,  DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00407.2017
  4. 4
    Bariya, M.; Nyein, H. Y. Y.; Javey, A. Wearable Sweat Sensors. Nat. Electron. 2018, 1, 160171,  DOI: 10.1038/s41928-018-0043-y
  5. 5
    Yetisen, A. K.; Martinez-Hurtado, J. L.; Ünal, B.; Khademhosseini, A.; Butt, H. Wearables in Medicine. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1706910,  DOI: 10.1002/adma.201706910
  6. 6
    Hayward, J. Electronic Skin Patches 2018–2028: Technologies, Players & Markets. IDTechEx ; 2018 https://www.idtechex.com/en/research-report/electronic-skin-patches-2019-2029/674.
  7. 7
    Heikenfeld, J.; Jajack, A.; Rogers, J.; Gutruf, P.; Tian, L.; Pan, T.; Li, R.; Khine, M.; Kim, J.; Wang, J.; Kim, J. Wearable Sensors: Modalities, Challenges, and Prospects. Lab Chip 2018, 18, 217248,  DOI: 10.1039/C7LC00914C
  8. 8
    Gao, W.; Emaminejad, S.; Nyein, H. Y. Y.; Challa, S.; Chen, K.; Peck, A.; Fahad, H. M.; Ota, H.; Shiraki, H.; Kiriya, D.; Lien, D.-H.; Brooks, G. A.; Davis, R. W.; Javey, A. Fully Integrated Wearable Sensor Arrays for Multiplexed in Situ Perspiration Analysis. Nature 2016, 529, 509514,  DOI: 10.1038/nature16521
  9. 9
    Parrilla, M.; Cuartero, M.; Crespo, G. A. Wearable Potentiometric Ion Sensors. TrAC, Trends Anal. Chem. 2019, 110, 303320,  DOI: 10.1016/j.trac.2018.11.024
  10. 10
    Choi, D. H.; Thaxton, A.; Jeong, I.; Kim, K.; Sosnay, P. R.; Cutting, G. R.; Searson, P. C. Sweat Test for Cystic Fibrosis: Wearable Sweat Sensor vs. Standard Laboratory Test. J. Cyst. Fibros. 2018, 17, e35e38,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jcf.2018.03.005
  11. 11
    Cuartero, M.; Parrilla, M.; Crespo, G. A. Wearable Potentiometric Sensors for Medical Applications. Sensors. 2019, 19, 363387,  DOI: 10.3390/s19020363
  12. 12
    Morgan, R. M.; Patterson, M. J.; Nimmo, M. a. Acute Effects of Dehydration on Sweat Composition in Men during Prolonged Exercise in the Heat. Acta Physiol. Scand. 2004, 182, 3743,  DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-201X.2004.01305.x
  13. 13
    Baker, L. B.; Stofan, J. R.; Hamilton, A. A.; Horswill, C. A. Comparison of Regional Patch Collection vs. Whole Body Washdown for Measuring Sweat Sodium and Potassium Loss during Exercise. J. Appl. Physiol. 2009, 107, 887895,  DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00197.2009
  14. 14
    Sonner, Z.; Wilder, E.; Heikenfeld, J.; Kasting, G.; Beyette, F.; Swaile, D.; Sherman, F.; Joyce, J.; Hagen, J.; Kelley-Loughnane, N.; Naik, R. The Microfluidics of the Eccrine Sweat Gland, Including Biomarker Partitioning, Transport, and Biosensing Implications. Biomicrofluidics 2015, 9, 031301,  DOI: 10.1063/1.4921039
  15. 15
    Ali, S. M.; Yosipovitch, G. Skin PH: From Basic Science to Basic Skin Care. Acta Derm. Venereol. 2013, 93, 261267,  DOI: 10.2340/00015555-1531
  16. 16
    Bohl, C. H.; Volpe, S. L. Magnesium and Exercise. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2002, 42, 533563,  DOI: 10.1080/20024091054247
  17. 17
    Parrilla, M.; Cánovas, R.; Jeerapan, I.; Andrade, F. J.; Wang, J. A Textile-Based Stretchable Multi-Ion Potentiometric Sensor. Adv. Healthcare Mater. 2016, 5, 9961001,  DOI: 10.1002/adhm.201600092
  18. 18
    Parrilla, M.; Ferré, J.; Guinovart, T.; Andrade, F. J. Wearable Potentiometric Sensors Based on Commercial Carbon Fibres for Monitoring Sodium in Sweat. Electroanalysis 2016, 28, 12671275,  DOI: 10.1002/elan.201600070
  19. 19
    Alizadeh, A.; Burns, A.; Lenigk, R.; Gettings, R.; Ashe, J.; Porter, A.; McCaul, M.; Barrett, R.; Diamond, D.; White, P.; Skeath, P.; Tomczak, M. A Wearable Patch for Continuous Monitoring of Sweat Electrolytes during Exertion. Lab Chip 2018, 18, 26322641,  DOI: 10.1039/C8LC00510A
  20. 20
    Nyein, H. Y. Y.; Tai, L.; Ngo, Q. P.; Chao, M.; Zhang, G. B.; Gao, W.; Bariya, M.; Bullock, J.; Kim, H.; Fahad, H. M.; Javey, A. A Wearable Microfluidic Sensing Patch for Dynamic Sweat Secretion Analysis. ACS Sensors 2018, 3, 944952,  DOI: 10.1021/acssensors.7b00961
  21. 21
    Sempionatto, J. R.; Martin, A.; García-Carmona, L.; Barfidokht, A.; Kurniawan, J. F.; Moreto, J. R.; Tang, G.; Shin, A.; Liu, X.; Escarpa, A.; Wang, J. Skin-Worn Soft Microfluidic Potentiometric Detection System. Electroanalysis 2019, 31, 239245,  DOI: 10.1002/elan.201800414
  22. 22
    Anastasova, S.; Crewther, B.; Bembnowicz, P.; Curto, V.; Ip, H. M.; Rosa, B.; Yang, G. Z. A Wearable Multisensing Patch for Continuous Sweat Monitoring. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2017, 94, 730,  DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2017.03.018
  23. 23
    Dziedzic, C. E.; Ross, M. L.; Slater, G. J.; Burke, L. M. Variability of Measurements of Sweat Sodium Using the Regional Absorbent-Patch Method. Int. J. Sport Physiol. Perform. 2014, 9, 832838,  DOI: 10.1123/ijspp.2013-0480
  24. 24
    Baker, L. B. Sweating Rate and Sweat Sodium Concentration in Athletes: A Review of Methodology and Intra/Interindividual Variability. Sports Med. 2017, 47, 111128,  DOI: 10.1007/s40279-017-0691-5
  25. 25
    Hu, J.; Ho, K. T.; Zou, X. U.; Smyrl, W. H.; Stein, A.; Buhlmann, P. All-Solid-State Reference Electrodes Based on Colloid-Imprinted Mesoporous Carbon and Their Application in Disposable Paper-Based Potentiometric Sensing Devices. Anal. Chem. 2015, 87, 29812987,  DOI: 10.1021/ac504556s
  26. 26
    Cuartero, M.; Crespo, G. A.; Bakker, E. Polyurethane Ionophore-Based Thin Layer Membranes for Voltammetric Ion Activity Sensing. Anal. Chem. 2016, 88, 56495654,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b01085
  27. 27
    Smith, C. J.; Havenith, G. Body Mapping of Sweating Patterns in Male Athletes in Mild Exercise-Induced Hyperthermia. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 2011, 111, 13911404,  DOI: 10.1007/s00421-010-1744-8
  28. 28
    Baker, L. B.; Ungaro, C. T.; Sopeña, B. C.; Nuccio, R. P.; Reimel, A. J.; Carter, J. M.; Stofan, J. R.; Barnes, K. A. Body Map of Regional vs. Whole Body Sweating Rate and Sweat Electrolyte Concentrations in Men and Women during Moderate Exercise-Heat Stress. J. Appl. Physiol. 2018, 124, 13041318,  DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00867.2017
  29. 29
    Dixit, C. K.; Kadimisetty, K.; Rusling, J. 3D-Printed Miniaturized Fluidic Tools in Chemistry and Biology. TrAC, Trends Anal. Chem. 2018, 106, 3752,  DOI: 10.1016/j.trac.2018.06.013
  30. 30
    Kim, J.; Kumar, R.; Bandodkar, A. J.; Wang, J. Advanced Materials for Printed Wearable Electrochemical Devices: A Review. Adv. Electron. Mater. 2017, 3, 1600260,  DOI: 10.1002/aelm.201600260
  31. 31
    Cánovas, R.; Parrilla, M.; Mercier, P.; Andrade, F. J.; Wang, J. Balloon-Embedded Sensors Withstanding Extreme Multiaxial Stretching and Global Bending Mechanical Stress: Towards Environmental and Security Monitoring. Adv. Mater. Technol. 2016, 1, 1600061,  DOI: 10.1002/admt.201600061
  32. 32
    Sato, K.; Kang, W. H.; Saga, K.; Sato, K. T. Biology of Sweat Glands and Their Disorders. I. Normal Sweat Gland Function. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 1989, 20, 537563,  DOI: 10.1016/S0190-9622(89)70063-3
  33. 33
    Emaminejad, S.; Gao, W.; Wu, E.; Davies, Z. A.; Yin Yin Nyein, H.; Challa, S.; Ryan, S. P.; Fahad, H. M.; Chen, K.; Shahpar, Z.; Talebi, S.; Milla, C.; Javey, A.; Davis, R. W. Autonomous Sweat Extraction and Analysis Applied to Cystic Fibrosis and Glucose Monitoring Using a Fully Integrated Wearable Platform. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2017, 114, 4625,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1701740114
  34. 34
    Tóth, K.; Fucskó, J.; Lindner, E.; Fehér, Z.; Pungor, E. Potentiometric Detection in Flow Analysis. Anal. Chim. Acta 1986, 179, 359370,  DOI: 10.1016/S0003-2670(00)84480-3
  35. 35
    Cazalé, A.; Sant, W.; Ginot, F.; Launay, J.-C.; Savourey, G.; Revol-Cavalier, F.; Lagarde, J. M.; Heinry, D.; Launay, J.; Temple-Boyer, P. Physiological Stress Monitoring Using Sodium Ion Potentiometric Microsensors for Sweat Analysis. Sens. Actuators, B 2016, 225, 19,  DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2015.10.114
  36. 36
    Nyein, H. Y. Y.; Gao, W.; Shahpar, Z.; Emaminejad, S.; Challa, S.; Chen, K.; Fahad, H. M.; Tai, L.-C.; Ota, H.; Davis, R. W.; Javey, A. A Wearable Electrochemical Platform for Noninvasive Simultaneous Monitoring of Ca 2+ and PH. ACS Nano 2016, 10, 72167224,  DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.6b04005
  37. 37
    Baker, L. B.; Ungaro, C. T.; Barnes, K. A.; Nuccio, R. P.; Reimel, A. J.; Stofan, J. R. Validity and Reliability of a Field Technique for Sweat Na+and K+analysis during Exercise in a Hot-Humid Environment. Physiol. Rep. 2014, 2, e12007,  DOI: 10.14814/phy2.12007

Cited By

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article is cited by 113 publications.

  1. Ziyi Mi, Youyuan Xia, Huo Dong, Yuhang Shen, Ziyou Feng, Yawen Hong, Haoyu Zhu, Binfeng Yin, Zhengping Ji, Qin Xu, Xiaoya Hu, Yun Shu. Microfluidic Wearable Electrochemical Sensor Based on MOF-Derived Hexagonal Rod-Shaped Porous Carbon for Sweat Metabolite and Electrolyte Analysis. Analytical Chemistry 2024, 96 (42) , 16676-16685. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.4c02950
  2. Daniel Rojas, Dario Torricelli, María Cuartero, Gastón A. Crespo. 3D-Printed Transducers for Solid Contact Potentiometric Ion Sensors: Improving Reproducibility by Fabrication Automation. Analytical Chemistry 2024, 96 (39) , 15572-15580. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.4c02098
  3. Yevedzo Chipangura, Maria Komal, Vilma S. M. Brandao, Christopher Sedmak, Jung Suk Choi, Sarah L. Swisher, Philippe Bühlmann, Andreas Stein. Nanoporous Carbon Materials as Solid Contacts for Microneedle Ion-Selective Sensors. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2024, 16 (34) , 44428-44439. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.4c07683
  4. Brian D. Spindler, Xin V. Chen, Katerina I. Graf, Philippe Bühlmann, Andreas Stein. Potassium Ion-Selective Electrodes with BME-44 Ionophores Covalently Attached to Condensation-Cured Silicone Membranes. Langmuir 2024, 40 (34) , 18112-18121. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.4c01726
  5. Siyi Liu, Lijie Zhong, Yitian Tang, Meixue Lai, Haocheng Wang, Yu Bao, Yingming Ma, Wei Wang, Li Niu, Shiyu Gan. Graphene Oxide–Poly(vinyl alcohol) Hydrogel-Coated Solid-Contact Ion-Selective Electrodes for Wearable Sweat Potassium Ion Sensing. Analytical Chemistry 2024, 96 (21) , 8594-8603. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.4c00609
  6. Xue Hui, Md Asaduzzaman, M. Abu Zahed, Sudeep Sharma, SeongHoon Jeong, Hyesu Song, Omar Faruk, Jae Yeong Park. Multifunctional Siloxene-Decorated Laser-Inscribed Graphene Patch for Sweat Ion Analysis and Electrocardiogram Monitoring. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2024, 16 (8) , 9725-9735. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.3c16676
  7. Surachate Kalasin, Pantawan Sangnuang. Multiplex Wearable Electrochemical Sensors Fabricated from Sodiated Polymers and Mxene Nanosheet To Measure Sodium and Creatinine Levels in Sweat. ACS Applied Nano Materials 2023, 6 (19) , 18209-18221. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.3c03469
  8. Brian D. Spindler, Katerina I. Graf, Xin I. N. Dong, Minog Kim, Xin V. Chen, Philippe Bühlmann, Andreas Stein. Influence of the Composition of Plasticizer-Free Silicone-Based Ion-Selective Membranes on Signal Stability in Aqueous and Blood Plasma Samples. Analytical Chemistry 2023, 95 (33) , 12419-12426. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.3c02074
  9. Mingpeng Yang, Nan Sun, Xiaochen Lai, Jiamin Wu, Lifan Wu, Xingqiang Zhao, Lihang Feng. Paper-Based Sandwich-Structured Wearable Sensor with Sebum Filtering for Continuous Detection of Sweat pH. ACS Sensors 2023, 8 (1) , 176-186. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssensors.2c02016
  10. Surachate Kalasin, Werasak Surareungchai. Challenges of Emerging Wearable Sensors for Remote Monitoring toward Telemedicine Healthcare. Analytical Chemistry 2023, 95 (3) , 1773-1784. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.2c02642
  11. Lijuan Chen, Fan Chen, Gang Liu, Haoliang Lin, Yu Bao, Dongxue Han, Wei Wang, Yingming Ma, Baohua Zhang, Li Niu. Superhydrophobic Functionalized Ti3C2Tx MXene-Based Skin-Attachable and Wearable Electrochemical pH Sensor for Real-Time Sweat Detection. Analytical Chemistry 2022, 94 (20) , 7319-7328. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.2c00684
  12. Surachate Kalasin, Pantawan Sangnuang, Werasak Surareungchai. Intelligent Wearable Sensors Interconnected with Advanced Wound Dressing Bandages for Contactless Chronic Skin Monitoring: Artificial Intelligence for Predicting Tissue Regeneration. Analytical Chemistry 2022, 94 (18) , 6842-6852. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.2c00782
  13. Annemarijn S. M. Steijlen, Kaspar M. B. Jansen, Jeroen Bastemeijer, Paddy J. French, Andre Bossche. Low-Cost Wearable Fluidic Sweat Collection Patch for Continuous Analyte Monitoring and Offline Analysis. Analytical Chemistry 2022, 94 (18) , 6893-6901. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.2c01052
  14. Liping Song, Jing Chen, Ben Bin Xu, Youju Huang. Flexible Plasmonic Biosensors for Healthcare Monitoring: Progress and Prospects. ACS Nano 2021, 15 (12) , 18822-18847. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.1c07176
  15. Kevin Van Hoovels, Xing Xuan, Maria Cuartero, Maarten Gijssel, Mikael Swarén, Gaston A. Crespo. Can Wearable Sweat Lactate Sensors Contribute to Sports Physiology?. ACS Sensors 2021, 6 (10) , 3496-3508. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssensors.1c01403
  16. Lei Mou, Yong Xia, Xingyu Jiang. Epidermal Sensor for Potentiometric Analysis of Metabolite and Electrolyte. Analytical Chemistry 2021, 93 (33) , 11525-11531. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.1c01940
  17. Xing Xuan, Clara Pérez-Ràfols, Chen Chen, Maria Cuartero, Gaston A. Crespo. Lactate Biosensing for Reliable On-Body Sweat Analysis. ACS Sensors 2021, 6 (7) , 2763-2771. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssensors.1c01009
  18. Tiziana Fuoco, Maria Cuartero, Marc Parrilla, Juan José García-Guzmán, Gaston A. Crespo, Anna Finne-Wistrand. Capturing the Real-Time Hydrolytic Degradation of a Library of Biomedical Polymers by Combining Traditional Assessment and Electrochemical Sensors. Biomacromolecules 2021, 22 (2) , 949-960. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.0c01621
  19. Elena Zdrachek, Eric Bakker. Potentiometric Sensing. Analytical Chemistry 2021, 93 (1) , 72-102. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.0c04249
  20. Jianan Xu, Zhen Zhang, Shiyu Gan, Han Gao, Huijun Kong, Zhongqian Song, Xiaoming Ge, Yu Bao, Li Niu. Highly Stretchable Fiber-Based Potentiometric Ion Sensors for Multichannel Real-Time Analysis of Human Sweat. ACS Sensors 2020, 5 (9) , 2834-2842. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssensors.0c00960
  21. Pawel L. Urban. Please Avoid Plotting Analytical Response against Logarithm of Concentration. Analytical Chemistry 2020, 92 (15) , 10210-10212. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.0c02096
  22. Alexander Wiorek, Marc Parrilla, María Cuartero, Gastón A. Crespo. Epidermal Patch with Glucose Biosensor: pH and Temperature Correction toward More Accurate Sweat Analysis during Sport Practice. Analytical Chemistry 2020, 92 (14) , 10153-10161. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.0c02211
  23. Qingfeng Zhai, Lim Wei Yap, Ren Wang, Shu Gong, Zhirui Guo, Yiyi Liu, Quanxia Lyu, Joseph Wang, George. P. Simon, Wenlong Cheng. Vertically Aligned Gold Nanowires as Stretchable and Wearable Epidermal Ion-Selective Electrode for Noninvasive Multiplexed Sweat Analysis. Analytical Chemistry 2020, 92 (6) , 4647-4655. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.0c00274
  24. Rocío Cánovas, Sara Padrell Sánchez, Marc Parrilla, María Cuartero, Gastón A. Crespo. Cytotoxicity Study of Ionophore-Based Membranes: Toward On-Body and in Vivo Ion Sensing. ACS Sensors 2019, 4 (9) , 2524-2535. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssensors.9b01322
  25. Wenjie Zhao, Chen Liu, Yanbing Wang, Kunyang Li, Zhaotao He, Shulan Zhou, Junyan Zeng, Oresegun Olakunle Ibrahim, Sheng Zhang, Qianqian Wang. A flexible substrate-free electrochemical tattoo sensor with alcohol transfer printing method for real-time monitoring of sodium ions in sweat. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical 2025, 428 , 137245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2025.137245
  26. Bajarang Bali Lal Srivastava. Biosensor-signal transducers. 2025, 71-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-21658-9.00029-2
  27. Nahid Rezvani Jalal, Tayyebeh Madrakian, Mazaher Ahmadi, Abbas Afkhami, Sina Khalili, Morteza Bahrami, Majid Roshanaei. Wireless wearable potentiometric sensor for simultaneous determination of pH, sodium and potassium in human sweat. Scientific Reports 2024, 14 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-62236-3
  28. Graziana Assalve, Paola Lunetti, Alessandra Di Cagno, Ernesto William De Luca, Stefano Aldegheri, Vincenzo Zara, Alessandra Ferramosca. Advanced Wearable Devices for Monitoring Sweat Biochemical Markers in Athletic Performance: A Comprehensive Review. Biosensors 2024, 14 (12) , 574. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios14120574
  29. Eliza J. Herrero, Philippe Bühlmann. Challenges and opportunities in the development of planar potentiometric sensors for point-of-care analysis. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry 2024, 181 , 118002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2024.118002
  30. Giulia Massaglia, Giacomo Spisni, Tommaso Serra, Marzia Quaglio. Laser-Induced Graphene Electrodes for Flexible pH Sensors. Nanomaterials 2024, 14 (24) , 2008. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14242008
  31. Liu-Chuang Zhao, Wen-Bo Chen, Xue-Fang Zhang, Ya-Xin Li, Kai-Di Lv, Le-Qian Hu. Advanced fluorescent probes, portable electrochemical and colorimetric sensors for detection of chloride ions in bodily fluids, foods and waters. Microchemical Journal 2024, 206 , 111528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2024.111528
  32. Yuanwan Lou, Jingkun Wang, Yubo Peng, Xiaona Wang, Jianan Zhang, Lingfeng Chen, Wenchao Gao, Zhipeng Gao, Xiaona Li, Weiyi Chen, Min Zhao. Double network hydrogel confined MXene/Liquid metal by dynamic hydrogen bond for high-performance wearable sensors. Chemical Engineering Journal 2024, 500 , 156884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2024.156884
  33. Eva-Maria Korek, Bajramshahe Shkodra, Antonio Altana, David Herbig, Paolo Lugli, Luisa Petti, Ralf Brederlow. Improved Selectivity of Impedimetric K + Sensors. 2024, 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1109/SENSORS60989.2024.10784744
  34. Chen Wei, Danni Fu, Tianyue Ma, Mo Chen, Fangling Wang, Guojun Chen, Zejun Wang. Sensing patches for biomarker identification in skin-derived biofluids. Biosensors and Bioelectronics 2024, 258 , 116326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2024.116326
  35. Yuxiang Pan, Xiaoyu Su, Ying Liu, Peidi Fan, Xunjia Li, Yibin Ying, Jianfeng Ping. A laser‐Engraved Wearable Electrochemical Sensing Patch for Heat Stress Precise Individual Management of Horse. Advanced Science 2024, 11 (28) https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202310069
  36. Logan Li, Shelby Hughes, Reyna Osborne, Xuewei Wang. Printing technologies for the fabrication of ion-selective electrodes. Sensing and Bio-Sensing Research 2024, 44 , 100650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbsr.2024.100650
  37. Guangyao Zhao, Zhiyuan Li, Xingcan Huang, Qiang Zhang, Yiming Liu, Xinge Yu. Recent advances of sweat sampling, sensing, energy-harvesting and data-display toward flexible sweat electronics. Soft Science 2024, 4 (2) https://doi.org/10.20517/ss.2024.04
  38. Xiujun Fu, Ye Qiu, Hengjie Zhang, Ye Tian, Aiping Liu, Huaping Wu. Microfluidic sweat patch based on capillary force and evaporation pump for real-time continuous sweat analysis. Biomicrofluidics 2024, 18 (3) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0208075
  39. Aohua Liu, Zhe Liu, Rongning Liang, Wei Qin. Polymeric membrane potentiometric antibiotic sensors using computer-aided screening of supramolecular macrocyclic carriers. The Analyst 2024, 149 (6) , 1738-1745. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3AN02154H
  40. Zhanna Boeva, Zekra Mousavi, Tomasz Sokalski, Johan Bobacka. Recent trends in non-invasive on-body chemical sensing. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry 2024, 172 , 117542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2024.117542
  41. Rei Shiwaku, Hiroyuki Matsui, Kuniaki Nagamine, Shizuo Tokito. Temperature Correction of Printed Na + , K + , and pH Sensors with PEDOT:PSS‐Based Thermistors toward Wearable Sweat Sensing. Advanced Sensor Research 2024, 3 (2) https://doi.org/10.1002/adsr.202300106
  42. Yevedzo E. Chipangura, Brian D. Spindler, Philippe Bühlmann, Andreas Stein. Design Criteria for Nanostructured Carbon Materials as Solid Contacts for Ion‐Selective Sensors. Advanced Materials 2024, 36 (8) https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202309778
  43. Guoqiang Xu, Xingcan Huang, Rui Shi, Yawen Yang, Pengchen Wu, Jingkun Zhou, Xinxin He, Jialin Li, Yuyang Zen, Yanli Jiao, Binbin Zhang, Jiyu Li, Guangyao Zhao, Yiming Liu, Ya Huang, Mengge Wu, Qiang Zhang, Zhihui Yang, Xinge Yu. Triboelectric Nanogenerator Enabled Sweat Extraction and Power Activation for Sweat Monitoring. Advanced Functional Materials 2024, 34 (9) https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202310777
  44. Biao Ma, Ke Huang, Gangsheng Chen, Yingnan Tian, Nan Jiang, Chao Zhao, Hong Liu. A dual-mode wearable sensor with coupled ion and pressure sensing. Soft Science 2024, 4 (1) https://doi.org/10.20517/ss.2023.41
  45. Quansheng Lu, Yun Wang, Yu Lu, Yiping Ren, Ran Fu, Wenbin Chen, Guan Jiang. Strain-insensitive and multiplexed potentiometric ion sensors via printed PMMA molecular layer. Analytica Chimica Acta 2024, 1287 , 342083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2023.342083
  46. Juliane R. Sempionatto, José Lasalde Ramírez, Yiran Yang, Wei Gao. Point of Care Genomics, Proteomics, Biomarkers, and Precision Nutrition: Emerging Point of Care Sensors for Precision Nutrition. 2024, 403-416. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-15315-0.00013-4
  47. Marc Parrilla. Microneedle-based electrochemical sensors for health monitoring. 2024, 481-520. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-13881-2.00020-5
  48. Lynnette Lyzwinski, Mohamed Elgendi, Alexander V. Shokurov, Tyler J. Cuthbert, Chakaveh Ahmadizadeh, Carlo Menon. Opportunities and challenges for sweat-based monitoring of metabolic syndrome via wearable technologies. Communications Engineering 2023, 2 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s44172-023-00097-w
  49. Tamoghna Saha, Rafael Del Caño, Ernesto De la Paz, Samar S. Sandhu, Joseph Wang. Access and Management of Sweat for Non‐Invasive Biomarker Monitoring: A Comprehensive Review. Small 2023, 19 (51) https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202206064
  50. Asmita Veronica, Yanan Li, Yue Li, I-Ming Hsing, Hnin Yin Yin Nyein. Dermal-fluid-enabled detection platforms for non-invasive ambulatory monitoring. Sensors & Diagnostics 2023, 2 (6) , 1335-1359. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3SD00165B
  51. Yanfang Wang, Suman Ma, Linyu Hu, Zhiyong Fan, Yuanjing Lin. Wearable and printable devices for electrolytes sensing. Nano Futures 2023, 7 (3) , 032002. https://doi.org/10.1088/2399-1984/ace40e
  52. Nafize Ishtiaque Hossain, Atul Sharma, Sameer Sonkusale. A Wearable and Multiplexed Electrochemical Sensor Suite for Real-Time Sweat Ionic Content and pH Monitoring With IoT Integration. IEEE Sensors Letters 2023, 7 (9) , 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1109/LSENS.2023.3300827
  53. Željko Janićijević, Trang-Anh Nguyen-Le, Larysa Baraban. Extended-gate field-effect transistor chemo- and biosensors: State of the art and perspectives. Next Nanotechnology 2023, 3-4 , 100025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nxnano.2023.100025
  54. Zhonghui Sun, Jianan Xu, Zhongqian Song, Dongyang Qu, Yingming Ma, Dongxue Han, Li Niu. Recent advances in all-solid-state ion-selective electrodes for wearable electrochemical sensors. SCIENTIA SINICA Chimica 2023, 95 https://doi.org/10.1360/SSC-2023-0032
  55. Jimin Lee, Myung Chul Kim, Ira Soltis, Sung Hoon Lee, Woon‐Hong Yeo. Advances in Electrochemical Sensors for Detecting Analytes in Biofluids. Advanced Sensor Research 2023, 2 (8) https://doi.org/10.1002/adsr.202200088
  56. Zijian An, QiQi Fu, Jingjiang Lv, Tao Zhou, Yue Wu, Yanli Lu, Guang Liu, Zhenghan Shi, Xin li, Fenni Zhang, Qingjun Liu. Body Heat Powered Wirelessly Wearable System for Real‐time Physiological and Biochemical Monitoring. Advanced Functional Materials 2023, 33 (34) https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202303361
  57. Yingwen Zhang, Jianjun Liao, Zehao Li, Mingxu Hu, Chao Bian, Shiwei Lin. All fabric and flexible wearable sensors for simultaneous sweat metabolite detection and high-efficiency collection. Talanta 2023, 260 , 124610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2023.124610
  58. Xing Xuan, Chen Chen, Clara Pérez‐Ràfols, Mikael Swarén, Lars Wedholm, Maria Cuartero, Gaston A. Crespo. A Wearable Biosensor for Sweat Lactate as a Proxy for Sport Performance Monitoring. Analysis & Sensing 2023, 3 (4) https://doi.org/10.1002/anse.202200047
  59. Bikram Khadka, Byeongmoon Lee, Ki-Taek Kim. Drug Delivery Systems for Personal Healthcare by Smart Wearable Patch System. Biomolecules 2023, 13 (6) , 929. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom13060929
  60. Emanuel Bilbao, Octavio Garate, Theo Rodríguez Campos, Mariano Roberti, Mijal Mass, Alex Lozano, Gloria Longinotti, Leandro Monsalve, Gabriel Ybarra. Electrochemical Sweat Sensors. Chemosensors 2023, 11 (4) , 244. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors11040244
  61. Xueqing Huangfu, Yang Guo, Samuel M. Mugo, Qiang Zhang. Hydrovoltaic Nanogenerators for Self‐Powered Sweat Electrolyte Analysis. Small 2023, 19 (15) https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202207134
  62. Gisela Ibáñez-Redín, Giovana Rosso Cagnani, Nathalia O. Gomes, Paulo A. Raymundo-Pereira, Sergio A. S. Machado, Marco Antonio Gutierrez, Jose Eduardo Krieger, Osvaldo N. Oliveira. Wearable potentiometric biosensor for analysis of urea in sweat. Biosensors and Bioelectronics 2023, 223 , 114994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2022.114994
  63. Hao Zhao, Xieli Zhang, Yanxia Qin, Yong Xia, Xin Xu, Xiguang Sun, Dehai Yu, Samuel M. Mugo, Dong Wang, Qiang Zhang. An Integrated Wearable Sweat Sensing Patch for Passive Continuous Analysis of Stress Biomarkers at Rest. Advanced Functional Materials 2023, 33 (9) https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202212083
  64. Shadab Faham, Abdollah Salimi, Raouf Ghavami. Electrochemical-based remote biomarker monitoring: Toward Internet of Wearable Things in telemedicine. Talanta 2023, 253 , 123892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2022.123892
  65. Philip Coatsworth, Laura Gonzalez-Macia, Alexander Silva Pinto Collins, Tolga Bozkurt, Firat Güder. Continuous monitoring of chemical signals in plants under stress. Nature Reviews Chemistry 2023, 7 (1) , 7-25. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41570-022-00443-0
  66. Fan Wang, Jinhuan Zhang, Mengdi Zhang, Cuiyue Xu, Shengqi Cheng, Qingjiang Wang, Fan Zhang, Xiao He, Pingang He. A multi-calibration potentiometric sensing array based on diboronic acid-PtAu/CNTs nanozyme for home monitoring of urine glucose. Analytica Chimica Acta 2023, 1237 , 340598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2022.340598
  67. Jing Yin, Jingcheng Li, Vundrala Sumedha Reddy, Dongxiao Ji, Seeram Ramakrishna, Lan Xu. Flexible Textile-Based Sweat Sensors for Wearable Applications. Biosensors 2023, 13 (1) , 127. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios13010127
  68. Xinyi Pei, Mimi Sun, Jingjuan Wang, Jing Bai, Xiangjie Bo, Ming Zhou. A Bifunctional Fully Integrated Wearable Tracker for Epidermal Sweat and Wound Exudate Multiple Biomarkers Monitoring. Small 2022, 18 (46) https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202205061
  69. Shuqi Wang, Mengyuan Liu, Yixiang Shi, Xianqing Yang, Lianhui Li, Qifeng Lu, Hui Zheng, Simin Feng, Yuanyuan Bai, Ting Zhang. Vertically aligned conductive metal-organic framework nanowires array composite fiber as efficient solid-contact for wearable potentiometric sweat sensing. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical 2022, 369 , 132290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2022.132290
  70. Luca Guagneli, Zekra Mousavi, Tomasz Sokalski, Ivo Leito, Johan Bobacka. Novel design of a planar flow-through potentiometric sensor. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry 2022, 923 , 116785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2022.116785
  71. Noemi Colozza, Ana Casanova, Bibiana M. Fernández‐Pérez, Gaston A. Crespo, Gabriel A. Flores, Konstantinos Kavallieratos, Juan de Gracia, Mårten Ahlquist, Maria Cuartero. Insights into Tripodal Tris(pyrazolyl) Compounds as Ionophores for Potentiometric Ammonium Ion Sensing. ChemElectroChem 2022, 9 (18) https://doi.org/10.1002/celc.202200716
  72. Tugba Ozer, Ismail Agir, Charles S. Henry. Low-cost Internet of Things (IoT)-enabled a wireless wearable device for detecting potassium ions at the point of care. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical 2022, 365 , 131961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2022.131961
  73. Hengjie Zhang, Ye Qiu, Sihang Yu, Chen Ding, Jiahui Hu, Hangcheng Qi, Ye Tian, Zheng Zhang, Aiping Liu, Huaping Wu. Wearable microfluidic patch with integrated capillary valves and pumps for sweat management and multiple biomarker analysis. Biomicrofluidics 2022, 16 (4) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0092084
  74. Emre Ozan Polat, M. Mustafa Cetin, Ahmet Fatih Tabak, Ebru Bilget Güven, Bengü Özuğur Uysal, Taner Arsan, Anas Kabbani, Houmeme Hamed, Sümeyye Berfin Gül. Transducer Technologies for Biosensors and Their Wearable Applications. Biosensors 2022, 12 (6) , 385. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios12060385
  75. Jianjun Liao, Xiangya Zhang, Zihan Sun, Hande Chen, Jian Fu, Hewei Si, Chengjun Ge, Shiwei Lin. Laser-Induced Graphene-Based Wearable Epidermal Ion-Selective Sensors for Noninvasive Multiplexed Sweat Analysis. Biosensors 2022, 12 (6) , 397. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios12060397
  76. Brince Paul Kunnel, Silvia Demuru. An epidermal wearable microfluidic patch for simultaneous sampling, storage, and analysis of biofluids with counterion monitoring. Lab on a Chip 2022, 22 (9) , 1793-1804. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2LC00183G
  77. Tao Lin, Yun Xu, Anshun Zhao, Wenshan He, Fei Xiao. Flexible electrochemical sensors integrated with nanomaterials for in situ determination of small molecules in biological samples: A review. Analytica Chimica Acta 2022, 1207 , 339461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2022.339461
  78. Yitian Tang, Lijie Zhong, Wei Wang, Ying He, Tingting Han, Longbin Xu, Xiaocheng Mo, Zhenbang Liu, Yingming Ma, Yu Bao, Shiyu Gan, Li Niu. Recent Advances in Wearable Potentiometric pH Sensors. Membranes 2022, 12 (5) , 504. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes12050504
  79. Maria A. Komkova, Artem A. Eliseev, Andrei A. Poyarkov, Elena V. Daboss, Pavel V. Evdokimov, Andrei A. Eliseev, Arkady A. Karyakin. Simultaneous monitoring of sweat lactate content and sweat secretion rate by wearable remote biosensors. Biosensors and Bioelectronics 2022, 202 , 113970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2022.113970
  80. Huixin Liu, Zhen Gu, Yuan Liu, Xinxin Xiao, Guangli Xiu. Validation of the Application of Solid Contact Ion-Selective Electrode for Off-Body Sweat Ion Monitoring. Biosensors 2022, 12 (4) , 229. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios12040229
  81. Marc Parrilla, Andres Vanhooydonck, Regan Watts, Karolien De Wael. Wearable wristband-based electrochemical sensor for the detection of phenylalanine in biofluids. Biosensors and Bioelectronics 2022, 197 , 113764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2021.113764
  82. Hu Li, Tianrui Chang, Yansong Gai, Kui Liang, Yanli Jiao, Dengfeng Li, Xinran Jiang, Yang Wang, Xingcan Huang, Han Wu, Yiming Liu, Jian Li, Yiming Bai, Kai Geng, Nianrong Zhang, Hua Meng, Dongsheng Huang, Zhou Li, Xinge Yu, Lingqian Chang. Human joint enabled flexible self-sustainable sweat sensors. Nano Energy 2022, 92 , 106786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2021.106786
  83. Dong Seok Kim, Jae-Min Jeong, Hong Jun Park, Yeong Kyun Kim, Kyoung G. Lee, Bong Gill Choi. Highly Concentrated, Conductive, Defect-free Graphene Ink for Screen-Printed Sensor Application. Nano-Micro Letters 2021, 13 (1) https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-021-00617-3
  84. Marc Parrilla, Karolien De Wael. Wearable Self‐Powered Electrochemical Devices for Continuous Health Management. Advanced Functional Materials 2021, 31 (50) https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202107042
  85. Tahir Raza, Lijun Qu, Waquar Ahmed Khokhar, Boakye Andrews, Afzal Ali, Mingwei Tian. Progress of Wearable and Flexible Electrochemical Biosensors With the Aid of Conductive Nanomaterials. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology 2021, 9 https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2021.761020
  86. Eliza J. Herrero, Philippe Bühlmann. Potentiometric Sensors with Polymeric Sensing and Reference Membranes Fully Integrated into a Sample‐Wicking Polyester Textile. Analysis & Sensing 2021, 1 (4) , 188-195. https://doi.org/10.1002/anse.202100027
  87. Shirin Mahinnezhad, Homa Emami, Mohsen Ketabi, Ahmad Al Shboul, Najet Belkhamssa, Andy Shih, Ricardo Izquierdo. Fully Printed pH Sensor Based in Carbon Black/Polyaniline Nanocomposite. 2021, 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1109/SENSORS47087.2021.9639597
  88. Vincenzo Mazzaracchio, Aristi Serani, Luca Fiore, Danila Moscone, Fabiana Arduini. All-solid state ion-selective carbon black-modified printed electrode for sodium detection in sweat. Electrochimica Acta 2021, 394 , 139050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2021.139050
  89. Nadtinan Promphet, Sarute Ummartyotin, Wittaya Ngeontae, Pumidech Puthongkham, Nadnudda Rodthongkum. Non-invasive wearable chemical sensors in real-life applications. Analytica Chimica Acta 2021, 1179 , 338643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2021.338643
  90. Sudipta Choudhury, Soumyendu Roy, Gourav Bhattacharya, Sam Fishlock, Sujit Deshmukh, Sangita Bhowmick, James McLaughlign, Susanta Sinha Roy. Potentiometric ion-selective sensors based on UV-ozone irradiated laser-induced graphene electrode. Electrochimica Acta 2021, 387 , 138341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2021.138341
  91. Anna-Maria Spehar-Délèze, Salzitsa Anastasova, Pankaj Vadgama. Monitoring of Lactate in Interstitial Fluid, Saliva and Sweat by Electrochemical Biosensor: The Uncertainties of Biological Interpretation. Chemosensors 2021, 9 (8) , 195. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors9080195
  92. Salhah D. Al-Qahtani, Omer A. Azher, Rasha Felaly, Abdu Subaihi, J. Alkabli, Omaymah Alaysuy, Nashwa M. El-Metwaly. Development of sponge-like cellulose colorimetric swab immobilized with anthocyanin from red-cabbage for sweat monitoring. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 2021, 182 , 2037-2047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.05.201
  93. Hassan Karimi-Maleh, Yasin Orooji, Fatemeh Karimi, Marzieh Alizadeh, Mehdi Baghayeri, Jalal Rouhi, Somayeh Tajik, Hadi Beitollahi, Shilpi Agarwal, Vinod K. Gupta, Saravanan Rajendran, Ali Ayati, Li Fu, Afsaneh L. Sanati, Bahareh Tanhaei, Fatih Sen, Mehdi shabani-nooshabadi, Padideh Naderi Asrami, Amani Al-Othman. A critical review on the use of potentiometric based biosensors for biomarkers detection. Biosensors and Bioelectronics 2021, 184 , 113252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2021.113252
  94. Devasier Bennet, Yasaman Khorsandian, Jody Pelusi, Amy Mirabella, Patrick Pirrotte, Frederic Zenhausern. Molecular and physical technologies for monitoring fluid and electrolyte imbalance: A focus on cancer population. Clinical and Translational Medicine 2021, 11 (6) https://doi.org/10.1002/ctm2.461
  95. Elena Zdrachek, Eric Bakker. Ion-to-electron capacitance of single-walled carbon nanotube layers before and after ion-selective membrane deposition. Microchimica Acta 2021, 188 (5) https://doi.org/10.1007/s00604-021-04805-1
  96. Brince Paul, Silvia Demuru, Céline Lafaye, Mathieu Saubade, Danick Briand. Printed Iontophoretic‐Integrated Wearable Microfluidic Sweat‐Sensing Patch for On‐Demand Point‐Of‐Care Sweat Analysis. Advanced Materials Technologies 2021, 6 (4) https://doi.org/10.1002/admt.202000910
  97. Roozbeh Ghaffari, John A. Rogers, Tyler R. Ray. Recent progress, challenges, and opportunities for wearable biochemical sensors for sweat analysis. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical 2021, 332 , 129447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2021.129447
  98. Li-Da Chen, Wei-Jhen Wang, Gou-Jen Wang. Electrochemical Detection of Electrolytes Using a Solid-State Ion-Selective Electrode of Single-Piece Type Membrane. Biosensors 2021, 11 (4) , 109. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios11040109
  99. Zhengyun Wang, Jihoon Shin, Jin‐Ho Park, Hakho Lee, Dong‐Hwan Kim, Hongfang Liu. Engineering Materials for Electrochemical Sweat Sensing. Advanced Functional Materials 2021, 31 (12) https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202008130
  100. Hyo-Ryoung Lim, Yongkuk Lee, Kathryn A. Jones, Young-Tae Kwon, Shinjae Kwon, Musa Mahmood, Soon Min Lee, Woon-Hong Yeo. All-in-one, wireless, fully flexible sodium sensor system with integrated Au/CNT/Au nanocomposites. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical 2021, 331 , 129416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2020.129416
Load all citations

Analytical Chemistry

Cite this: Anal. Chem. 2019, 91, 13, 8644–8651
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.9b02126
Published June 3, 2019

Copyright © 2019 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under these Terms of Use.

Article Views

10k

Altmetric

-

Citations

Learn about these metrics

Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.

  • Abstract

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. Illustration of the research question in this article. Is the on-body data provided by WPISs reliable? What is the proper validation protocol to evaluate reliability of the real-time observations?.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. (a) Electrodes before and after functionalization. (b) Images of the electrode array, the sampling cell, and entire wearable device. (c) Sweat flow in the sampling cell once it is attached to the skin. (d) WPISs attached to the skin. ISM = ion-selective membrane.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. (a) Response of three pH electrodes for a pH change from 5.6 to 4.7. Flow rate = 4 μL min–1. Dotted lines indicate the response time. (b) Response of three pH electrodes in a solution of pH 5.6 at 4, 8, and 16 μL min–1. (c) pH calibrations at 4, 8, and 16 μL min–1. (d) WPISs under torsion deformation. Response of a K+ electrode after applying different torsion deformations. (e) Calibrations using WPISs for Cl, Na+, K+, and pH before and after the incorporation of the sampling cell and after on-body measurements. All the calibration curves were accomplished in artificial sweat.

    Figure 4

    Figure 4. (a) Concentration profiles observed with the WPISs during 60 min of a cycling workout. The WPISs contained three twin electrodes for each ion. (b) Validation of K+ on-body measurements. Every ion was measured in a different on-body test (with n = 3). A total number of 5 tests were accomplished, labeled as T1–T5.

    Figure 5

    Figure 5. (a) Electrolyte dynamics observed during on-body tests. (a) Na+ concentration of an individual subjected to 1-h cycling at high intensity (on-body test T7). (b) Cl and pH monitoring in two different individuals subjected to the same physical activity (22 °C, relative humidity 70%, 1-h cycling, high intensity). The dots indicate the concentrations of sweat analyzed by IC after sweat collection by m-REG. On-body tests T8 and T9.

  • References


    This article references 37 other publications.

    1. 1
      Kim, J.; Campbell, A. S.; de Ávila, B. E.-F.; Wang, J. Wearable Biosensors for Healthcare Monitoring. Nat. Biotechnol. 2019, 37, 389,  DOI: 10.1038/s41587-019-0045-y
    2. 2
      Kaya, T.; Liu, G.; Ho, J.; Yelamarthi, K.; Miller, K.; Edwards, J.; Stannard, A. Wearable Sweat Sensors: Background and Current Trends. Electroanalysis 2019, 31 (3), 411,  DOI: 10.1002/elan.201800677
    3. 3
      Gao, W.; Brooks, G. A.; Klonoff, D. C. Wearable Physiological Systems and Technologies for Metabolic Monitoring. J. Appl. Physiol. 2018, 124, 548556,  DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00407.2017
    4. 4
      Bariya, M.; Nyein, H. Y. Y.; Javey, A. Wearable Sweat Sensors. Nat. Electron. 2018, 1, 160171,  DOI: 10.1038/s41928-018-0043-y
    5. 5
      Yetisen, A. K.; Martinez-Hurtado, J. L.; Ünal, B.; Khademhosseini, A.; Butt, H. Wearables in Medicine. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1706910,  DOI: 10.1002/adma.201706910
    6. 6
      Hayward, J. Electronic Skin Patches 2018–2028: Technologies, Players & Markets. IDTechEx ; 2018 https://www.idtechex.com/en/research-report/electronic-skin-patches-2019-2029/674.
    7. 7
      Heikenfeld, J.; Jajack, A.; Rogers, J.; Gutruf, P.; Tian, L.; Pan, T.; Li, R.; Khine, M.; Kim, J.; Wang, J.; Kim, J. Wearable Sensors: Modalities, Challenges, and Prospects. Lab Chip 2018, 18, 217248,  DOI: 10.1039/C7LC00914C
    8. 8
      Gao, W.; Emaminejad, S.; Nyein, H. Y. Y.; Challa, S.; Chen, K.; Peck, A.; Fahad, H. M.; Ota, H.; Shiraki, H.; Kiriya, D.; Lien, D.-H.; Brooks, G. A.; Davis, R. W.; Javey, A. Fully Integrated Wearable Sensor Arrays for Multiplexed in Situ Perspiration Analysis. Nature 2016, 529, 509514,  DOI: 10.1038/nature16521
    9. 9
      Parrilla, M.; Cuartero, M.; Crespo, G. A. Wearable Potentiometric Ion Sensors. TrAC, Trends Anal. Chem. 2019, 110, 303320,  DOI: 10.1016/j.trac.2018.11.024
    10. 10
      Choi, D. H.; Thaxton, A.; Jeong, I.; Kim, K.; Sosnay, P. R.; Cutting, G. R.; Searson, P. C. Sweat Test for Cystic Fibrosis: Wearable Sweat Sensor vs. Standard Laboratory Test. J. Cyst. Fibros. 2018, 17, e35e38,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jcf.2018.03.005
    11. 11
      Cuartero, M.; Parrilla, M.; Crespo, G. A. Wearable Potentiometric Sensors for Medical Applications. Sensors. 2019, 19, 363387,  DOI: 10.3390/s19020363
    12. 12
      Morgan, R. M.; Patterson, M. J.; Nimmo, M. a. Acute Effects of Dehydration on Sweat Composition in Men during Prolonged Exercise in the Heat. Acta Physiol. Scand. 2004, 182, 3743,  DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-201X.2004.01305.x
    13. 13
      Baker, L. B.; Stofan, J. R.; Hamilton, A. A.; Horswill, C. A. Comparison of Regional Patch Collection vs. Whole Body Washdown for Measuring Sweat Sodium and Potassium Loss during Exercise. J. Appl. Physiol. 2009, 107, 887895,  DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00197.2009
    14. 14
      Sonner, Z.; Wilder, E.; Heikenfeld, J.; Kasting, G.; Beyette, F.; Swaile, D.; Sherman, F.; Joyce, J.; Hagen, J.; Kelley-Loughnane, N.; Naik, R. The Microfluidics of the Eccrine Sweat Gland, Including Biomarker Partitioning, Transport, and Biosensing Implications. Biomicrofluidics 2015, 9, 031301,  DOI: 10.1063/1.4921039
    15. 15
      Ali, S. M.; Yosipovitch, G. Skin PH: From Basic Science to Basic Skin Care. Acta Derm. Venereol. 2013, 93, 261267,  DOI: 10.2340/00015555-1531
    16. 16
      Bohl, C. H.; Volpe, S. L. Magnesium and Exercise. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2002, 42, 533563,  DOI: 10.1080/20024091054247
    17. 17
      Parrilla, M.; Cánovas, R.; Jeerapan, I.; Andrade, F. J.; Wang, J. A Textile-Based Stretchable Multi-Ion Potentiometric Sensor. Adv. Healthcare Mater. 2016, 5, 9961001,  DOI: 10.1002/adhm.201600092
    18. 18
      Parrilla, M.; Ferré, J.; Guinovart, T.; Andrade, F. J. Wearable Potentiometric Sensors Based on Commercial Carbon Fibres for Monitoring Sodium in Sweat. Electroanalysis 2016, 28, 12671275,  DOI: 10.1002/elan.201600070
    19. 19
      Alizadeh, A.; Burns, A.; Lenigk, R.; Gettings, R.; Ashe, J.; Porter, A.; McCaul, M.; Barrett, R.; Diamond, D.; White, P.; Skeath, P.; Tomczak, M. A Wearable Patch for Continuous Monitoring of Sweat Electrolytes during Exertion. Lab Chip 2018, 18, 26322641,  DOI: 10.1039/C8LC00510A
    20. 20
      Nyein, H. Y. Y.; Tai, L.; Ngo, Q. P.; Chao, M.; Zhang, G. B.; Gao, W.; Bariya, M.; Bullock, J.; Kim, H.; Fahad, H. M.; Javey, A. A Wearable Microfluidic Sensing Patch for Dynamic Sweat Secretion Analysis. ACS Sensors 2018, 3, 944952,  DOI: 10.1021/acssensors.7b00961
    21. 21
      Sempionatto, J. R.; Martin, A.; García-Carmona, L.; Barfidokht, A.; Kurniawan, J. F.; Moreto, J. R.; Tang, G.; Shin, A.; Liu, X.; Escarpa, A.; Wang, J. Skin-Worn Soft Microfluidic Potentiometric Detection System. Electroanalysis 2019, 31, 239245,  DOI: 10.1002/elan.201800414
    22. 22
      Anastasova, S.; Crewther, B.; Bembnowicz, P.; Curto, V.; Ip, H. M.; Rosa, B.; Yang, G. Z. A Wearable Multisensing Patch for Continuous Sweat Monitoring. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2017, 94, 730,  DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2017.03.018
    23. 23
      Dziedzic, C. E.; Ross, M. L.; Slater, G. J.; Burke, L. M. Variability of Measurements of Sweat Sodium Using the Regional Absorbent-Patch Method. Int. J. Sport Physiol. Perform. 2014, 9, 832838,  DOI: 10.1123/ijspp.2013-0480
    24. 24
      Baker, L. B. Sweating Rate and Sweat Sodium Concentration in Athletes: A Review of Methodology and Intra/Interindividual Variability. Sports Med. 2017, 47, 111128,  DOI: 10.1007/s40279-017-0691-5
    25. 25
      Hu, J.; Ho, K. T.; Zou, X. U.; Smyrl, W. H.; Stein, A.; Buhlmann, P. All-Solid-State Reference Electrodes Based on Colloid-Imprinted Mesoporous Carbon and Their Application in Disposable Paper-Based Potentiometric Sensing Devices. Anal. Chem. 2015, 87, 29812987,  DOI: 10.1021/ac504556s
    26. 26
      Cuartero, M.; Crespo, G. A.; Bakker, E. Polyurethane Ionophore-Based Thin Layer Membranes for Voltammetric Ion Activity Sensing. Anal. Chem. 2016, 88, 56495654,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b01085
    27. 27
      Smith, C. J.; Havenith, G. Body Mapping of Sweating Patterns in Male Athletes in Mild Exercise-Induced Hyperthermia. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 2011, 111, 13911404,  DOI: 10.1007/s00421-010-1744-8
    28. 28
      Baker, L. B.; Ungaro, C. T.; Sopeña, B. C.; Nuccio, R. P.; Reimel, A. J.; Carter, J. M.; Stofan, J. R.; Barnes, K. A. Body Map of Regional vs. Whole Body Sweating Rate and Sweat Electrolyte Concentrations in Men and Women during Moderate Exercise-Heat Stress. J. Appl. Physiol. 2018, 124, 13041318,  DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00867.2017
    29. 29
      Dixit, C. K.; Kadimisetty, K.; Rusling, J. 3D-Printed Miniaturized Fluidic Tools in Chemistry and Biology. TrAC, Trends Anal. Chem. 2018, 106, 3752,  DOI: 10.1016/j.trac.2018.06.013
    30. 30
      Kim, J.; Kumar, R.; Bandodkar, A. J.; Wang, J. Advanced Materials for Printed Wearable Electrochemical Devices: A Review. Adv. Electron. Mater. 2017, 3, 1600260,  DOI: 10.1002/aelm.201600260
    31. 31
      Cánovas, R.; Parrilla, M.; Mercier, P.; Andrade, F. J.; Wang, J. Balloon-Embedded Sensors Withstanding Extreme Multiaxial Stretching and Global Bending Mechanical Stress: Towards Environmental and Security Monitoring. Adv. Mater. Technol. 2016, 1, 1600061,  DOI: 10.1002/admt.201600061
    32. 32
      Sato, K.; Kang, W. H.; Saga, K.; Sato, K. T. Biology of Sweat Glands and Their Disorders. I. Normal Sweat Gland Function. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 1989, 20, 537563,  DOI: 10.1016/S0190-9622(89)70063-3
    33. 33
      Emaminejad, S.; Gao, W.; Wu, E.; Davies, Z. A.; Yin Yin Nyein, H.; Challa, S.; Ryan, S. P.; Fahad, H. M.; Chen, K.; Shahpar, Z.; Talebi, S.; Milla, C.; Javey, A.; Davis, R. W. Autonomous Sweat Extraction and Analysis Applied to Cystic Fibrosis and Glucose Monitoring Using a Fully Integrated Wearable Platform. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2017, 114, 4625,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1701740114
    34. 34
      Tóth, K.; Fucskó, J.; Lindner, E.; Fehér, Z.; Pungor, E. Potentiometric Detection in Flow Analysis. Anal. Chim. Acta 1986, 179, 359370,  DOI: 10.1016/S0003-2670(00)84480-3
    35. 35
      Cazalé, A.; Sant, W.; Ginot, F.; Launay, J.-C.; Savourey, G.; Revol-Cavalier, F.; Lagarde, J. M.; Heinry, D.; Launay, J.; Temple-Boyer, P. Physiological Stress Monitoring Using Sodium Ion Potentiometric Microsensors for Sweat Analysis. Sens. Actuators, B 2016, 225, 19,  DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2015.10.114
    36. 36
      Nyein, H. Y. Y.; Gao, W.; Shahpar, Z.; Emaminejad, S.; Challa, S.; Chen, K.; Fahad, H. M.; Tai, L.-C.; Ota, H.; Davis, R. W.; Javey, A. A Wearable Electrochemical Platform for Noninvasive Simultaneous Monitoring of Ca 2+ and PH. ACS Nano 2016, 10, 72167224,  DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.6b04005
    37. 37
      Baker, L. B.; Ungaro, C. T.; Barnes, K. A.; Nuccio, R. P.; Reimel, A. J.; Stofan, J. R. Validity and Reliability of a Field Technique for Sweat Na+and K+analysis during Exercise in a Hot-Humid Environment. Physiol. Rep. 2014, 2, e12007,  DOI: 10.14814/phy2.12007
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information


    The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b02126.

    • Experimental section, analytical parameters and membrane compositions, and data treatment and validation (PDF)


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.