ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
My Activity
CONTENT TYPES

Photoaffinity Cross-Linking and Unnatural Amino Acid Mutagenesis Reveal Insights into Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Binding to the Calcitonin Receptor-like Receptor/Receptor Activity-Modifying Protein 1 (CLR/RAMP1) Complex

  • John Simms
    John Simms
    Aston University, Birmingham B4 7ET, U.K.
    Coventry University, Priory Street, Coventry CV1 5FB, U.K.
    More by John Simms
  • Romez Uddin
    Romez Uddin
    Aston University, Birmingham B4 7ET, U.K.
    More by Romez Uddin
  • Thomas P. Sakmar
    Thomas P. Sakmar
    The Rockefeller University, 1230 York Avenue, New York, New York 10065, United States
  • Joseph J. Gingell
    Joseph J. Gingell
    University of Auckland, 3A Symonds Street, Auckland 1010, New Zealand
  • Michael L. Garelja
    Michael L. Garelja
    University of Auckland, 3A Symonds Street, Auckland 1010, New Zealand
  • Debbie L. Hay
    Debbie L. Hay
    University of Auckland, 3A Symonds Street, Auckland 1010, New Zealand
  • Margaret A. Brimble
    Margaret A. Brimble
    University of Auckland, 3A Symonds Street, Auckland 1010, New Zealand
  • Paul W. Harris
    Paul W. Harris
    University of Auckland, 3A Symonds Street, Auckland 1010, New Zealand
  • Christopher A. Reynolds
    Christopher A. Reynolds
    University of Essex, Wivenhoe Park, Colchester CO4 3SQ, U.K.
  • , and 
  • David R. Poyner*
    David R. Poyner
    Aston University, Birmingham B4 7ET, U.K.
    *E-mail: [email protected]. Telephone: +44 (0)121 204 3997.
Cite this: Biochemistry 2018, 57, 32, 4915–4922
Publication Date (Web):July 13, 2018
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biochem.8b00502

Copyright © 2018 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under CC-BY.

  • Open Access

Article Views

2512

Altmetric

-

Citations

LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICS
PDF (2 MB)

Abstract

Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) binds to the complex of the calcitonin receptor-like receptor (CLR) with receptor activity-modifying protein 1 (RAMP1). How CGRP interacts with the transmembrane domain (including the extracellular loops) of this family B receptor remains unclear. In this study, a photoaffinity cross-linker, p-azido l-phenylalanine (azF), was incorporated into CLR, chiefly in the second extracellular loop (ECL2) using genetic code expansion and unnatural amino acid mutagenesis. The method was optimized to ensure efficient photolysis of azF residues near the transmembrane bundle of the receptor. A CGRP analogue modified with fluorescein at position 15 was used for detection of ultraviolet-induced cross-linking. The methodology was verified by confirming the known contacts of CGRP to the extracellular domain of CLR. Within ECL2, the chief contacts were I284 on the loop itself and L291, at the top of the fifth transmembrane helix (TM5). Minor contacts were noted along the lip of ECL2 between S286 and L290 and also with M223 in TM3 and F349 in TM6. Full length molecular models of the bound receptor complex suggest that CGRP sits at the top of the TM bundle, with Thr6 of the peptide making contacts with L291 and H295. I284 is likely to contact Leu12 and Ala13 of CGRP, and Leu16 of CGRP is at the ECL/extracellular domain boundary of CLR. The reduced potency, Emax, and affinity of [Leu16Ala]-human α CGRP are consistent with this model. Contacts between Thr6 of CGRP and H295 may be particularly important for receptor activation.

Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) is an abundant sensory neuropeptide; it is known to be a very potent vasodilator and is implicated in migraines. It is part of the calcitonin superfamily of peptides that also includes adrenomedullin, adrenomedullin 2/intermedin, and amylin. (1,2) The peptides all bind to family B/secretin-like G protein-coupled receptors, either the calcitonin receptor or the calcitonin receptor-like receptor (CLR). However, for high-affinity binding for all of these ligands apart from calcitonin, it is necessary for the receptor to form a complex with a second transmembrane protein from the receptor activity-modifying protein (RAMP) family with only three members. The CGRP receptor is formed from CLR and RAMP1, although CGRP will also bind with high affinity to the complex of the calcitonin receptor and RAMP1. (1)
The binding of endogenous peptide ligands to family B GPCRs generally follows the two-domain model in which the N-terminal tail of the peptide interacts with the transmembrane (TM) domain of the receptor whereas the C-terminal tail binds to the extracellular domain (ECD) of the receptor. (3) Recently, a number of structures of full length family B GPCRs have been published, namely, for the glucagon and glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptors. (4−8) The full length calcitonin receptor has been visualized by cryo-electron microscopy, but the ECD of the receptor was very flexible and so could not be resolved. The bound salmon calcitonin peptide was also poorly resolved, and its binding mode was refined by only rigid body fitting of the calcitonin receptor ECD structure [Protein Data Bank (PDB) entry 5II0] and confirmed with data from mutagenesis. (9) For the CGRP receptor, a crystal structure is available showing the C-terminal tail of a CGRP analogue bound to the ECDs of CLR and RAMP1. (10) Extensive mutagenesis data that have allowed the construction of models of how CGRP interacts with the TM domain of the receptor are available. (11−15) These studies have implicated extracellular loop 2 (ECL2) of CLR as being especially important for CGRP binding. (12−14) However, direct evidence of molecular contacts between the ligand and receptor is lacking.
Photoaffinity cross-linking has long been used to map the binding of ligands to receptors. (16) Conventionally, a photoaffinity cross-linker is incorporated into the ligand; this then requires extensive peptide mapping to identify the most likely contact point on the receptor. With the use of genetic code expansion and unnatural amino acid mutagenesis, (17) it is now possible to incorporate the photoaffinity cross-linker into the receptor, thereby eliminating the need for peptide mapping or sequencing to identify contact points on the receptor. This general approach, known as targeted photo-cross-linking, (18) has been used to map ligand–receptor interactions in a number of GPCRs, including the neurokinin NK-1 receptor, (19) ghrelin receptor, (20) type 1 receptor for the corticotropin releasing factor (CRF1R), (21−23) and GLP-1 receptor. (24) This has not yet been extensively applied to a complex dimeric receptor, such as the CGRP receptor. In the study presented here, we have developed a modified targeted photo-cross-linking strategy to study ECL2 of CLR and have identified two major contact points for CGRP: I284 and L291.

Materials and Methods

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

Materials

Human α CGRP was from Bachem (St. Helens, U.K.). CGRP analogues were synthesized as indicated below. Alpha Screen, LANCE cAMP assay kits, reagents, plates, and 125I-labeled human iodohistidyl10-α-CGRP were purchased from PerkinElmer (Waltham, MA).

Peptide Synthesis

[Lys(5(6)-carboxyfluorescein)15]-α-CGRP, [Leu12]-α-CGRP, and [Leu16]-α-CGRP were synthesized by solid phase peptide synthesis using the Fmoc/tBu method on a 0.1 mmol scale largely as described previously. (25) Briefly, Rink amide ChemMatrix resin (0.48 mmol/g) was elongated using a PS3 (Protein Technologies, Tucson, AZ) automated peptide synthesizer. The Fmoc group was removed with 20% piperidine in dimethylformamide (DMF) (v/v) for 2 × 5 min, and the Fmoc amino acids were coupled for 20 min using 1-[bis(dimethylamino)methylene]-1H-1,2,3-triazolo[4,5-b]pyridinium 3-oxide hexafluorophosphate and N,N-diisopropylethylamine. A pseudoproline, Fmoc-Leu-Ser[ψ-Me,MePro] was used at position 16/17 to increase the synthetic efficiency. (26) To enable incorporation of the 5(6)-carboxyfluorescein to a side chain amine, Leu15 was substituted with Lys(Dde) [Dde = 1-(4,4-dimethyl-2,6-dioxacyclohexylidene)ethyl]. Boc-alanine was used as the N-terminal amino acid.
Following chain assembly, on-resin removal of the Dde group on Lys15 was accomplished with 2% hydrazine hydrate in DMF (v/v) for 2 × 3 min, and 5(6)-carboxyfluorescein was coupled with N,N′-diisopropylcarbodiimide/1-hydroxybenzotriazole overnight. The resin was then treated with 20% piperidine in DMF (v/v) for 4 × 5 min to remove excess 5(6)-carboxyfluorescein. (27) The crude peptide was cleaved from the resin with concomitant removal of side chain protecting groups with 94% trifluoroacetic acid, 1% triisopropylsilane, 2.5% water, and 2.5% ethanedithiol (v/v/v/v) for 3 h, precipitated with cold diethyl ether, isolated by centrifugation, dissolved in 50% aqueous acetonitrile containing 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid, and lyophilized to afford 228 mg of the crude peptide. The crude fluorescently labeled α-CGRP was analyzed by liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry (calcd mass of 4165.33 Da, found mass of 4163.30 ± 0.9 Da) and then purified by sample displacement chromatography (28) on a C18 Gemini (Phenomenex) column (10 mm × 250 mm) at a flow rate of 5 mL/min at 50 °C to give 25.1 mg of pure linear (unoxidized) [Lys(5(6)-carboxyfluorescein)15]-α-CGRP.
The linear peptide (25 mg) was dissolved in 0.1 M Tris-HCl (pH 7.85) at a concentration of 1 mg/mL, and the oxidation (disulfide formation) was allowed to proceed at room temperature open to air. Monitoring by reverse phase high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) indicated that the reaction was complete after 5 h. The reaction mixture was acidified to pH 2, diluted with water (60 mL), and purified by semipreparative reverse phase HPLC using a C18 Gemini column (10 mm × 250 mm) at a flow rate of 5 mL/min at 50 °C and eluted using an appropriate gradient based on the analytical HPLC profile. Fractions containing the pure peptide were identified by electrospray mass spectrometry and/or HPLC, pooled, and lyophilized to give [Lys(5(6)-carboxyfluorescein)15]-α-CGRP at >95% purity as judged by integration of the HPLC chromatogram at 210 nm (calcd mass of 4163.31 Da, found mass of 4162.20 ± 0.5 Da).

Unnatural Amino Acid Mutagenesis and Cross-Linking Strategy

Unnatural amino acid mutagenesis was performed in HEK293T cells as described previously, (24,29) using Amber mutant human CLR, myc-tagged RAMP1, suppressor tRNA, and azF aminoacyl tRNA synthetase but with some modifications. HEK293T cells were seeded to a density of 800000 cells per well (resulting in 70% cell confluence the next day) of a six-well plate. Twenty-four hours after being seeded, the cells were transfected with a DNA cocktail comprising 1 μg of mutated/WT receptor, 1 μg of suppressor tRNA, and 0.5 μg of aminoacyl tRNA synthetase using lipofectamine (Life Technologies catalog no. 18324-012) as per the manufacturer’s instructions. Four hours post-transfection, the medium was replaced with Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) supplemented with 20% (v/v) FBS and 1 mM azF, which itself was subsequently replaced after 24 h with DMEM supplemented with 20% (v/v) FBS and 0.5 mM azF. Cells were harvested after a further 24 h, and the membrane fraction was isolated by centrifugation. The membranes were incubated with the labeled peptide for 1 h at room temperature. Once the incubation was complete, the sample was split into two equal parts. One part was pipetted into a quartz cuvette and exposed to 254 nm light for 1 h (an exposure longer than that previously reported (24)), while the other was wrapped in aluminum foil and also placed in the light source. Heat was dissipated in both samples using silicone tubing inserted into the cuvette that was flushed with ice-cold water. Cross-linking was performed in a UVP cross-linker (Analytik-Jena AG) at an energy of 100 μJ/cm, (2) with the sample approximately 10 cm from the light source. Both the cross-linked samples and the control samples were pelleted by centrifugation, washed using phosphate-buffered saline, and solubilized using dodecyl maltoside for 4 h. Post-solubilization, the samples were centrifuged at 30000g for 30 min, after which 150 μL of the soluble fraction was pipetted into a well of a 96-well plate and read using a Mithras LB 940 instrument (Berthould). The cross-linked and control samples were compared to determine the degree of peptide labeling.

Tyrosine Mutagenesis

Individual amino acids in human HA-tagged CLR were mutated to tyrosine as described previously. (11,12,14)

cAMP Production

Human HA-tagged CLR (WT or mutant) and myc-tagged RAMP1 were transfected into HEK293T or HEK293S cells, stimulated with human α-CGRP or synthetic peptides, and cAMP accumulation was measured via Alpha Screen or LANCE as previously described. (11,13,30)

Radioligand Binding

Competition radioligand binding assays were performed on HEK293S membranes using 125I-labeled human α-CGRP. HEK293S cells were grown in 15 cm dishes, and each dish was transfected with 30 μg of human HA-tagged CLR and 30 μg of myc-tagged RAMP1 using polyethylenimine (PEI) as described previously. (13) Forty-eight hours after transfection, membranes were isolated by homogenizing cells followed by centrifugation at 100000g for 1 h at 4 °C, and membranes were resuspended and stored at −80 °C. The binding assay was performed essentially as described previously (31) except the membranes were incubated with labeled and unlabeled peptides for 1 h at room temperature.

Data Analysis

Concentration response curves were fitted to a three-parameter logistic equation to obtain Emax, pEC50, and basal responses. The Hill coefficient was constrained to unity. Curve fitting was performed with GraphPad Prism version 7, as described previously. (13) For photoaffinity cross-linking, paired Student’s t tests were used to assess if the total cross-linking for each mutant was statistically different from the nonspecific cross-linking, accepting significance at a P < 0.05 level.

Molecular Modeling

Homology models of the active CLR were generated using Modeler (32) utilizing the recently determined cryo-electron microscope structures of the activated GLP-1 and calcitonin receptors (PDB entries 5VAI and 5UZ7, respectively). (8,9) One thousand models combining homology-based restraints from both templates (>2 Å root-mean-square deviation between models) were generated by Modeler using the default method. The transmembrane and loop regions of the Modeler-based structures were further refined and ranked using the membrane relax module of ROSETTA. (33) The refined models were clustered, and the best model was chosen on the basis of the largest cluster with the lowest ROSETTA membrane score.
The peptide was initially ab initio folded using an in-house script with a disulfide bond constraining Cys2 and Cys7 of the peptide. Regions of secondary structure (34) were also imposed on the ab initio simulation. The best scoring folded peptide was docked on the basis of the FlexPepDock module of ROSETTA; 10000 docking solutions between the peptide and receptor were generated. The FlexPepDock docked solutions were filtered in two stages. The docked solutions were initially filtered using analogous contact restraints (cutoff of 5 Å) as observed in the 4RWG crystal structure. (9) These results were further filtered by keeping any solution in which both Ile284 and Leu291 were within 5 Å of any atom of the docked CGRP ligand. The filtered results (737 docked poses) were then further refined using the membrane relax module also found in the ROSETTA suite of software. The middle structure of the largest, lowest-energy cluster was chosen for further analysis.
Replica exchange Monte Carlo simulations as implemented in Hippo (35) were used explore the conformational space of the ROSETTA-refined model. Sixteen replicas were simulated over the temperature range of 300–500 K following a Boltzmann distribution in a 30 Å implicit membrane. Other variables were kept as the default settings. The trajectory was visualized using Visual Molecular Dynamics. (36)

Results

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

Activity of [Lys(5(6)-carboxyfluorescein)15] Human α-CGRP (15-Fluo CGRP)

To identify cross-linking to CLR, a fluorescent CGRP agonist was required. On the basis of previously published structure–activity data, (37) supported by molecular modeling, (11,38) we reasoned that it should be possible to modify CGRP at position 15 while retaining agonist activity. The native Leu at this residue was replaced by Lys and derivatized with 5(6)-carboxyfluorescein. The resulting analogue was evaluated for its ability to stimulate cAMP production via the CGRP receptor. While it had reduced potency, it was a full agonist (Figure 1), suggesting that this modification did not greatly affect the functional properties of the ligand

Figure 1

Figure 1. cAMP production on HEK293T cells transfected with CLR and RAMP1 and exposed to CGRP or 15-Fluo CGRP for 15 min. Values are means ± the standard error of the mean (SEM); n = 3 independent experiments.

Confirmation of the Cross-Linking Strategy

Preliminary experiments indicated that optimal specific cross-linking was obtained following a 1 h exposure to ultraviolet (UV) light. The availability of a crystal structure showing the binding of a modified CGRP analogue to the extracellular domain of the CGRP receptor (10) provided a system for evaluating our methodology. A series of azF mutants was constructed in which residues within 5 Å of or more than 7 Å from the bound CGRP analogue were substituted. There was excellent agreement between the ability of the mutants to cross-link to CGRP and their distances from the bound CGRP analogue in the crystal structure (Figure 2).

Figure 2

Figure 2. Fluorescence of solubilized HEK293T cell membranes from cells transfected with RAMP1 and CLR containing azF substitutions at the indicated residues. Membranes were exposed to 15-Fluo CGRP in the presence or absence of UV light. D94, H114, W121, and N128 are all within 5 Å of bound CGRP; (10) other residues are 7–10 Å away. Values are means ± SEM; n = 3. *P < 0.05, and **P < 0.01; values of total labeling that are significantly different from the nonspecific values in the paired control samples, i.e., in the absence of UV light.

Cross-Linking by Residues in ECL2

A scan was then performed on ECL2 of CLR and its flanking regions from H270 to Y292, excluding C282, which is involved in a conserved disulfide bond with C212 at the extracellular end of TM3. The data suggest that major points of attachment for 15-Fluo CGRP are I284 and L291, with much weaker although significant labeling in a number of other positions at the distal end of the loop (Figure 3). There was virtually no specific labeling at any position in the loop proximal to D280. It is possible that a lack of labeling might simply reflect the fact that the receptor is nonfunctional when substituted with azF. To test this, a Tyr scan of the residues mutated to azF was performed, excluding the native tyrosines at positions 277 and 278 (Figure 4). A Tyr rather than an azF scan was performed because the modified aminoacyl tRNA synthetase used to incorporate azF will also accept Tyr, albeit at lower efficiency, resulting in a mixed population of receptors potentially with one of two different residues at the same site. (24) Tyr is structurally the closest natural amino acid to azF. The results showed that all the mutants assessed should still be able to interact with 15-Fluo CGRP at 100 nM, the concentration used in our cross-linking experiments, as the Tyr mutants retained a good sensitivity to CGRP.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Fluorescence of solubilized HEK293T cell membranes from cells transfected with RAMP1 and CLR containing azF substitutions at the indicated residues. Membranes were exposed to 15-Fluo CGRP in the presence or absence of UV light. The values are the specific labeling, following subtraction of the nonspecific from total bound fluorescence. Values are means ± SEM; n = 3–6. *P < 0.05; values for which total labeling is significantly different from the nonspecific values in the paired control samples, i.e., in the absence of UV light. Nonspecific labeling ranged from 2247 to 5759 AU.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Tyrosine scan of ECL2. Potency of human α-CGRP at stimulating cAMP production in HEK293T cells transfected with CLR (WT or mutants) and RAMP1. Values are means ± SEM; n = 3.

Role of TM3 and TM6

The current cross-linking data and previous mutation studies have indicated that ECL2 and the first turn of TM5 are important in forming the binding site for CGRP. We extended the use of our cross-linking method to address the role of other parts of the receptor. M223 (TM3) and F349 (TM6) were mutated to azF. These residues are likely to face into the TM bundle of CLR but are approximately two helical turns deeper into the TM bundle than L291 is (Figure 6). Thus, they provide insight into how far CGRP penetrates into the TM core of CLR. The specific cross-linking seen with both of these residues was comparable with that of S286 (Figure 5), which appears to act as a minor contact in ECL2 (Figure 3), although we cannot exclude a lower cross-linking efficiency due to poor photolysis of residues deep in the TM bundle. It seems likely that M223 and F349 are at the base of the binding pocket for CGRP.

Figure 5

Figure 5. Fluorescence of solubilized HEK293T cell membranes from cells transfected with RAMP1 and CLR containing azF substitutions at the indicated residues. Membranes were exposed to 15-Fluo CGRP in the presence or absence of UV light. Values are means ± SEM; n = 3. *P < 0.05; values of total labeling significantly different from the nonspecific values in the paired control samples, i.e., in the absence of UV light.

Molecular Modeling of Bound CGRP

Our modeling suggests that CGRP extends down as far as H295, in TM5. I284 is close to Leu12 and Ala13 of CGRP, and L291 is adjacent to Thr6 of CGRP (Figure 6). Leu16 of CGRP is the most proximal residue of the bound CGRP to make potential contact with the ECLs. It is close to I284 and V198 (in ECL1) but is also in the proximity of I32 of the ECD, perhaps making contact with both ECLs and the ECD of CLR.

Figure 6

Figure 6. Molecular model of the CLR (brown ribbon)/RAMP1 (blue ribbon; TM region omitted for the sake of clarity) complex with bound CGRP (pink ribbon). (A) Detail of predicted interactions of CGRP with I284 and L291. (B) Predicted position of bound CGRP with residues on the periphery of the binding site. CLR residues shown in space-filling mode; CGRP residues colored green. The models can be viewed online using Molecule Viewer (39) at https://bit.ly/2FnQAHp (recommended browsers are Google Chrome in incognito mode or Firefox). (C) Full length structure of the CLR complex. The positions of TM5 and helix 8 are highlighted to aid orientation.

Activity of [Leu12Ala]- and [Leu16Ala]-Human α-CGRP

To further test our proposed mode of binding, we investigated the ability of [Leu12Ala]- and [Leu16Ala]-human α-CGRP to stimulate cAMP. Both analogues showed substantial reductions in potency and Emax, with [Leu16Ala]-human α-CGRP showing the largest effects (Figure 7). This result was confirmed in a radioligand binding assay, in which [Leu16Ala]-human α-CGRP also showed a substantial reduction in affinity.

Figure 7

Figure 7. Comparison of the ability of [Leu12Ala]- and [Leu16Ala]-human α-CGRP (A) to stimulate cAMP in HEK293S cells transfected with HA-CLR and myc-RAMP1 or (B) to displace [125I]CGRP at the CGRP receptor. Values are means ± SEM; n = 3 or 4.

Discussion

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

We have used unnatural amino acid mutagenesis to map key residues in and adjacent to ECL2 of CLR that contribute to the binding of CGRP. The data suggest that I284 and L291 make contacts in the vicinity of Thr6 and Leu12 of bound CGRP. This binding orientation is consistent with the modeled position of calcitonin in the cryo-electron microscopy structure of the calcitonin receptor. (9)
A number of the residues that we have identified in this study as contributing to the binding of CGRP have been previously identified as being important for CGRP production of cAMP, based on mutagenesis. We predicted that I284 could interact with one or more CGRP residues C-terminal to the 2–7 disulfide-bonded loop of the peptide, conventionally considered to be the mediator of receptor activation. (13) However, using an alanine scan, we have previously found that changes to Val8 and Thr9 of CGRP can alter its efficacy. (25) Our current model suggests that Val8 is adjacent to H194 in TM2 and Thr9 is in the proximity of the backbone of ECL2. Our study further extends this by demonstrating that Leu16 in CGRP can influence efficacy, potentially by contacting I32 in the ECD of CLR. Furthermore, we have observed during a replica exchange Monte Carlo simulation of the bound CGRP (to investigate dynamic stability), L16 periodically interacts with V198 (ECL1) and I284 of CLR. V198 and I32 have both been shown to be important for cAMP production by CGRP. (40,41) These observations suggest how CGRP residues outside of the classic 1–7 “activation” domain of the peptide can influence efficacy; we speculate that Leu16 may be particularly important in interacting with both the ECLs and ECD of CLR. It may therefore be possible to develop truncated analogues that retain agonist activity by interacting with the upper regions of the TM bundle and ECLs, as has been done for GLP-1. (42)
Within the 1–7 region of CGRP, our previous structure–activity work indicated that Thr6 was essential for agonism. In fact, this residue is absolutely conserved in all members of the calcitonin family of peptides. (25,34) In our model, Thr6 of CGRP is close to not only L291 of TM5 but also H295 a turn lower. Previous mutagenesis has shown that H295 is important for the activation of all CLR/RAMP complexes with both CGRP and adrenomedullin; (11) its equivalent is also important for agonism by calcitonin in the calcitonin receptor. (9) Molecular dynamics simulations indicated that H295, at the top of TM5, controls interhelical contacts among TM3, TM5, TM6, and TM7 of CLR. A rotation of this residue caused helix sliding and tilting that opened the G protein binding pocket. (11) Residues deeper in the receptor that are important for receptor activation such as E348 (11) would seem unlikely to be significant ligand contacts, unless they are connected by bound water molecules.
Although I284 and L291 were the main contacts revealed in this study, it is interesting to note that there were a range of minor contacts in the distal part of ECL2. The pattern here was that every other residue between I284 and L290 appeared as contacts. Interestingly, our previous mutagenesis and modeling have suggested that this forms a short stretch of β-strand, along the rim of the cavity between TM4 and TM5. (12) This secondary structure element is consistent with the labeling pattern.
In eight of 15 of the human family B GPCRs, the equivalent of I284 is glutamic or aspartic acid; in three additional receptors, it is threonine. Only in CLR, the calcitonin receptor (leucine), and the corticotrophin receptors (phenylalanine) is the corresponding residue hydrophobic. Thus, within family B GPCRs, this residue may be important in ligand specificity; it faces into the core of the receptor where it can be resolved in structures. In the calcitonin receptor, the equivalent residue is important for the binding of human and porcine but not salmon calcitonin, indicating how similar ligands can differentially interact with residues within their binding pockets. (43) The absence of labeling for W283 is noteworthy as this residue is highly conserved in family B GPCRs and mutation may show deleterious effects. (44,45) Its side chain orientation is variable in the current family B GPCR structures, either facing into the core in the calcitonin and glucagon receptor structures or inserting between TM3 and TM4 in other structures. (4,5,9,46) These data suggest that W283 does not contact the peptide, indicating it is most likely to be inserted between TM3 and TM4 (Figure 6B).
The techniques described in this paper may be applied to other receptors. While previously the method has been applied to the GLP-1 receptor, (24) our experience is that significant refinement is required. In the study presented here, it was necessary to illuminate the receptor for 1 h to obtain cross-linking, rather than for the 5 min used in the GLP-1 study. This difference may reflect the fact that the GLP-1 study was focused on the extracellular domain of the receptor; greater exposure times may be necessary for residues within the membrane domain. In studies of CRF1R, where transmembrane residues were also targeted, illumination was performed for 20–40 min. (21,22) Thus, investigators should optimize labeling conditions to ensure their protocols are maximally effective. The cross-linking efficiency will also depend on the power of the UV source and the distance of the sample from the light, which are likely to vary between laboratories.
In conclusion, this study suggests that CGRP binds to a pocket formed by the ECLs of CLR, penetrating approximately two turns into the TM region. Direct contacts with residues here and in the ECLs form the basis of the agonist-induced conformational shift in CLR during receptor activation.

Author Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

  • Corresponding Author
  • Authors
    • John Simms - Aston University, Birmingham B4 7ET, U.K.Coventry University, Priory Street, Coventry CV1 5FB, U.K.
    • Romez Uddin - Aston University, Birmingham B4 7ET, U.K.
    • Thomas P. Sakmar - The Rockefeller University, 1230 York Avenue, New York, New York 10065, United States
    • Joseph J. Gingell - University of Auckland, 3A Symonds Street, Auckland 1010, New Zealand
    • Michael L. Garelja - University of Auckland, 3A Symonds Street, Auckland 1010, New Zealand
    • Debbie L. Hay - University of Auckland, 3A Symonds Street, Auckland 1010, New ZealandOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-9558-5122
    • Margaret A. Brimble - University of Auckland, 3A Symonds Street, Auckland 1010, New ZealandOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-7086-4096
    • Paul W. Harris - University of Auckland, 3A Symonds Street, Auckland 1010, New Zealand
    • Christopher A. Reynolds - University of Essex, Wivenhoe Park, Colchester CO4 3SQ, U.K.
  • Funding

    This work was supported by BBSRC grants to D.R.P. (BB/M007529/1) and C.A.R. (BB/M006883/1). C.A.R. is a Royal Society Industry Fellow. D.L.H. is a James Cook Research Fellow of the Royal Society of New Zealand.

  • Notes
    The authors declare no competing financial interest.

    To access the research data supporting this publication, see https://doi.org/10.17036/researchdata.aston.ac.uk.00000368.

Acknowledgments

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

The authors thank Dr. Casandra Koole and Dr. Harriet Watkins for advice. Furthermore, the authors thank Merry Wang at Autodesk for help and advice with Molecule Viewer.

Abbreviations

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

azF-p

azido l-phenylalanine

AM

adrenomedullin

CGRP

calcitonin gene-related peptide

CLR

calcitonin receptor-like receptor

CT

calcitonin

Dde

1-(4,4-dimethyl-2,6-dioxacyclohexylidene)ethyl

DMF

dimethylformamide

ECD

extracellular domain

ECL

extracellular loop

GLP-1

glucagon-like peptide-1

GPCR

G protein-coupled receptor

RAMP

receptor activity-modifying protein

TM

transmembrane.

References

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

This article references 46 other publications.

  1. 1
    Hay, D. L., Garelja, M. L., Poyner, D. R., and Walker, C. S. (2018) Update on the pharmacology of calcitonin/CGRP family of peptides: IUPHAR Review 25. Br. J. Pharmacol. 175, 317,  DOI: 10.1111/bph.14075
  2. 2
    Hay, D. L. and Walker, C. S. (2017) CGRP and its receptors. Headache 57, 625636,  DOI: 10.1111/head.13064
  3. 3
    Hoare, S. R. (2005) Mechanisms of peptide and nonpeptide ligand binding to Class B G-protein-coupled receptors.. Drug Discovery Today 10, 417427,  DOI: 10.1016/S1359-6446(05)03370-2
  4. 4
    Zhang, H., Qiao, A., Yang, D., Yang, L., Dai, A., de Graaf, C., Reedtz-Runge, S., Dharmarajan, V., Zhang, H., Han, G. W., Grant, T. D., Sierra, R. G., Weierstall, U., Nelson, G., Liu, W., Wu, Y., Ma, L., Cai, X., Lin, G., Wu, X., Geng, Z., Dong, Y., Song, G., Griffin, P. R., Lau, J., Cherezov, V., Yang, H., Hanson, M. A., Stevens, R. C., Zhao, Q., Jiang, H., Wang, M. W., and Wu, B. (2017) Structure of the full-length glucagon class B G-protein-coupled receptor. Nature 546, 259264,  DOI: 10.1038/nature22363
  5. 5
    Jazayeri, A., Rappas, M., Brown, A. J. H., Kean, J., Errey, J. C., Robertson, N. J., Fiez-Vandal, C., Andrews, S. P., Congreve, M., Bortolato, A., Mason, J. S., Baig, A. H., Teobald, I., Dore, A. S., Weir, M., Cooke, R. M., and Marshall, F. H. (2017) Crystal structure of the GLP-1 receptor bound to a peptide agonist. Nature 546, 254258,  DOI: 10.1038/nature22800
  6. 6
    Zhang, H., Qiao, A., Yang, L., Van Eps, N., Frederiksen, K. S., Yang, D., Dai, A., Cai, X., Zhang, H., Yi, C., Cao, C., He, L., Yang, H., Lau, J., Ernst, O. P., Hanson, M. A., Stevens, R. C., Wang, M. W., Reedtz-Runge, S., Jiang, H., Zhao, Q., and Wu, B. (2018) Structure of the glucagon receptor in complex with a glucagon analogue. Nature 553, 106110,  DOI: 10.1038/nature25153
  7. 7
    Liang, Y. L., Khoshouei, M., Glukhova, A., Furness, S. G. B., Zhao, P., Clydesdale, L., Koole, C., Truong, T. T., Thal, D. M., Lei, S., Radjainia, M., Danev, R., Baumeister, W., Wang, M. W., Miller, L. J., Christopoulos, A., Sexton, P. M., and Wootten, D. (2018) Phase-plate cryo-EM structure of a biased agonist-bound human GLP-1 receptor-Gs complex. Nature 555, 121125,  DOI: 10.1038/nature25773
  8. 8
    Zhang, Y., Sun, B., Feng, D., Hu, H., Chu, M., Qu, Q., Tarrasch, J. T., Li, S., Sun Kobilka, T., Kobilka, B. K., and Skiniotis, G. (2017) Cryo-EM structure of the activated GLP-1 receptor in complex with a G protein. Nature 546, 248253,  DOI: 10.1038/nature22394
  9. 9
    Liang, Y. L., Khoshouei, M., Radjainia, M., Zhang, Y., Glukhova, A., Tarrasch, J., Thal, D. M., Furness, S. G. B., Christopoulos, G., Coudrat, T., Danev, R., Baumeister, W., Miller, L. J., Christopoulos, A., Kobilka, B. K., Wootten, D., Skiniotis, G., and Sexton, P. M. (2017) Phase-plate cryo-EM structure of a class B GPCR-G-protein complex. Nature 546, 118123,  DOI: 10.1038/nature22327
  10. 10
    Booe, J. M., Walker, C. S., Barwell, J., Kuteyi, G., Simms, J., Jamaluddin, M. A., Warner, M. L., Bill, R. M., Harris, P. W., Brimble, M. A., Poyner, D. R., Hay, D. L., and Pioszak, A. A. (2015) Structural Basis for Receptor Activity-Modifying Protein-Dependent Selective Peptide Recognition by a G Protein-Coupled Receptor. Mol. Cell 58, 10401052,  DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.04.018
  11. 11
    Woolley, M. J., Reynolds, C. A., Simms, J., Walker, C. S., Mobarec, J. C., Garelja, M. L., Conner, A. C., Poyner, D. R., and Hay, D. L. (2017) Receptor activity-modifying protein dependent and independent activation mechanisms in the coupling of calcitonin gene-related peptide and adrenomedullin receptors to Gs. Biochem. Pharmacol. 142, 96110,  DOI: 10.1016/j.bcp.2017.07.005
  12. 12
    Woolley, M. J., Simms, J., Mobarec, J. C., Reynolds, C. A., Poyner, D. R., and Conner, A. C. (2017) Understanding the molecular functions of the second extracellular loop (ECL2) of the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor using a comprehensive mutagenesis approach. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 454, 3949,  DOI: 10.1016/j.mce.2017.05.034
  13. 13
    Woolley, M. J., Simms, J., Uddin, S., Poyner, D. R., and Conner, A. C. (2017) Relative Antagonism of Mutants of the CGRP Receptor Extracellular Loop 2 Domain (ECL2) Using a Truncated Competitive Antagonist (CGRP8–37): Evidence for the Dual Involvement of ECL2 in the Two-Domain Binding Model. Biochemistry 56, 38773880,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.biochem.7b00077
  14. 14
    Woolley, M. J., Watkins, H. A., Taddese, B., Karakullukcu, Z. G., Barwell, J., Smith, K. J., Hay, D. L., Poyner, D. R., Reynolds, C. A., and Conner, A. C. (2013) The role of ECL2 in CGRP receptor activation: a combined modelling and experimental approach,. J. R. Soc., Interface 10, 20130589,  DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2013.0589
  15. 15
    Vohra, S., Taddese, B., Conner, A. C., Poyner, D. R., Hay, D. L., Barwell, J., Reeves, P. J., Upton, G. J., and Reynolds, C. A. (2013) Similarity between class A and class B G-protein-coupled receptors exemplified through calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor modelling and mutagenesis studies, Journal of the Royal Society. J. R. Soc., Interface 10, 20120846,  DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2012.0846
  16. 16
    Dong, M. and Miller, L. J. (2006) Use of photoaffinity labeling to understand the molecular basis of ligand binding to the secretin receptor. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1070, 248264,  DOI: 10.1196/annals.1317.023
  17. 17
    Wang, L., Brock, A., Herberich, B., and Schultz, P. G. (2001) Expanding the genetic code of Escherichia coli. Science 292, 498500,  DOI: 10.1126/science.1060077
  18. 18
    Grunbeck, A. and Sakmar, T. P. (2013) Probing G protein-coupled receptor-ligand interactions with targeted photoactivatable cross-linkers. Biochemistry 52, 86258632,  DOI: 10.1021/bi401300y
  19. 19
    Valentin-Hansen, L., Park, M., Huber, T., Grunbeck, A., Naganathan, S., Schwartz, T. W., and Sakmar, T. P. (2014) Mapping substance P binding sites on the neurokinin-1 receptor using genetic incorporation of a photoreactive amino acid. J. Biol. Chem. 289, 1804518054,  DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M113.527085
  20. 20
    Park, M., Sivertsen, B. B., Els-Heindl, S., Huber, T., Holst, B., Beck-Sickinger, A. G., Schwartz, T. W., and Sakmar, T. P. (2015) Bioorthogonal Labeling of Ghrelin Receptor to Facilitate Studies of Ligand-Dependent Conformational Dynamics. Chem. Biol. 22, 14311436,  DOI: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2015.09.014
  21. 21
    Coin, I., Katritch, V., Sun, T., Xiang, Z., Siu, F. Y., Beyermann, M., Stevens, R. C., and Wang, L. (2013) Genetically encoded chemical probes in cells reveal the binding path of urocortin-I to CRF class B GPCR. Cell 155, 12581269,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.11.008
  22. 22
    Seidel, L., Zarzycka, B., Zaidi, S. A., Katritch, V., and Coin, I. (2017) Structural insight into the activation of a class B G-protein-coupled receptor by peptide hormones in live human cells. eLife 6, e27711,  DOI: 10.7554/eLife.27711
  23. 23
    Coin, I., Perrin, M. H., Vale, W. W., and Wang, L. (2011) Photo-cross-linkers incorporated into G-protein-coupled receptors in mammalian cells: a ligand comparison, Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 50, 80778081,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201102646
  24. 24
    Koole, C., Reynolds, C. A., Mobarec, J. C., Hick, C., Sexton, P. M., and Sakmar, T. P. (2017) Genetically encoded photocross-linkers determine the biological binding site of exendin-4 peptide in the N-terminal domain of the intact human glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R). J. Biol. Chem. 292, 71317144,  DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M117.779496
  25. 25
    Hay, D. L., Harris, P. W., Kowalczyk, R., Brimble, M. A., Rathbone, D. L., Barwell, J., Conner, A. C., and Poyner, D. R. (2014) Structure-activity relationships of the N-terminus of calcitonin gene-related peptide: key roles of alanine-5 and threonine-6 in receptor activation. Br. J. Pharmacol. 171, 415426,  DOI: 10.1111/bph.12464
  26. 26
    Wöhr, T. and Mutter, M. (1995) Pseudo-prolines in peptide synthesis: Direct insertion of serine and threonine derived oxazolidines in dipeptides. Tetrahedron Lett. 36, 38473848,  DOI: 10.1016/0040-4039(95)00667-2
  27. 27
    Fischer, R., Mader, O., Jung, G., and Brock, R. (2003) Extending the Applicability of Carboxyfluorescein in Solid-Phase Synthesis. Bioconjugate Chem. 14, 653660,  DOI: 10.1021/bc025658b
  28. 28
    Harris, P. W. R., Lee, D. J., and Brimble, M. A. (2012) A slow gradient approach for the purification of synthetic polypeptides by reversed phase high performance liquid chromatography,. J. Pept. Sci. 18, 549555,  DOI: 10.1002/psc.2432
  29. 29
    Ye, S., Kohrer, C., Huber, T., Kazmi, M., Sachdev, P., Yan, E. C., Bhagat, A., RajBhandary, U. L., and Sakmar, T. P. (2008) Site-specific incorporation of keto amino acids into functional G protein-coupled receptors using unnatural amino acid mutagenesis. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 15251533,  DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M707355200
  30. 30
    Garelja, M. L., Walker, C. A., Siow, A., Yang, S. H., Harris, P. W. R., Brimble, M. A., Watkins, H. A., Gingell, J. J., and Hay, D. L. (2018) Receptor Activity Modifying Proteins Have Limited Effects on the Class B G Protein-Coupled Receptor Calcitonin Receptor-Like Receptor Stalk. Biochemistry 57, 14101422,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.biochem.7b01180
  31. 31
    Qi, T., Christopoulos, G., Bailey, R. J., Christopoulos, A., Sexton, P. M., and Hay, D. L. (2008) Identification of N-terminal receptor activity-modifying protein residues important for calcitonin gene-related peptide, adrenomedullin, and amylin receptor function. Mol. Pharmacol. 74, 10591071,  DOI: 10.1124/mol.108.047142
  32. 32
    Sali, A. and Blundell, T. L. (1993) Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. J. Mol. Biol. 234, 779815,  DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1993.1626
  33. 33
    Barth, P., Schonbrun, J., and Baker, D. (2007) Toward high-resolution prediction and design of transmembrane helical protein structures. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 104, 1568215687,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0702515104
  34. 34
    Watkins, H. A., Rathbone, D. L., Barwell, J., Hay, D. L., and Poyner, D. R. (2013) Structure-activity relationships for alpha-calcitonin gene-related peptide. Br. J. Pharmacol. 170, 13081322,  DOI: 10.1111/bph.12072
  35. 35
    Ulmschneider, J. P. and Ulmschneider, M. B. (2009) Sampling efficiency in explicit and implicit membrane environments studied by peptide folding simulations. Proteins: Struct., Funct., Genet. 75, 586597,  DOI: 10.1002/prot.22270
  36. 36
    Humphrey, W., Dalke, A., and Schulten, K. (1996) VMD - Visual Molecular Dynamics. J. Mol. Graphics 14, 3338,  DOI: 10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5
  37. 37
    Howitt, S. G., Kilk, K., Wang, Y., Smith, D. M., Langel, U., and Poyner, D. R. (2003) The role of the 8–18 helix of CGRP8–37 in mediating high affinity binding to CGRP receptors; coulombic and steric interactions,. Br. J. Pharmacol. 138, 325332,  DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0705040
  38. 38
    Watkins, H. A., Chakravarthy, M., Abhayawardana, R. S., Gingell, J. J., Garelja, M., Pardamwar, M., McElhinney, J. M., Lathbridge, A., Constantine, A., Harris, P. W., Yuen, T. Y., Brimble, M. A., Barwell, J., Poyner, D. R., Woolley, M. J., Conner, A. C., Pioszak, A. A., Reynolds, C. A., and Hay, D. L. (2016) Receptor Activity-modifying Proteins 2 and 3 Generate Adrenomedullin Receptor Subtypes with Distinct Molecular Properties. J. Biol. Chem. 291, 1165711675,  DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M115.688218
  39. 39
    Balo, A. R., Wang, M., and Ernst, O. P. (2017) Accessible virtual reality of biomolecular structural models using the Autodesk Molecule Viewer. Nat. Methods 14, 11221123,  DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.4506
  40. 40
    Barwell, J., Conner, A., and Poyner, D. R. (2011) Extracellular loops 1 and 3 and their associated transmembrane regions of the calcitonin receptor-like receptor are needed for CGRP receptor function. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Mol. Cell Res. 1813, 19061916,  DOI: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2011.06.005
  41. 41
    Barwell, J., Miller, P. S., Donnelly, D., and Poyner, D. R. (2010) Mapping interaction sites within the N-terminus of the calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor; the role of residues 23–60 of the calcitonin receptor-like receptor. Peptides 31, 170176,  DOI: 10.1016/j.peptides.2009.10.021
  42. 42
    Hoang, H. N., Song, K., Hill, T. A., Derksen, D. R., Edmonds, D. J., Kok, W. M., Limberakis, C., Liras, S., Loria, P. M., Mascitti, V., Mathiowetz, A. M., Mitchell, J. M., Piotrowski, D. W., Price, D. A., Stanton, R. V., Suen, J. Y., Withka, J. M., Griffith, D. A., and Fairlie, D. P. (2015) Short Hydrophobic Peptides with Cyclic Constraints Are Potent Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor (GLP-1R) Agonists. J. Med. Chem. 58, 40804085,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b00166
  43. 43
    Dal Maso, E., Zhu, Y., Pham, V., Reynolds, C. A., Deganutti, G., Hick, C. A., Yang, D., Christopoulos, A., Hay, D. L., Wang, M. W., Sexton, P. M., Furness, S. G. B., and Wootten, D. (2018) Extracellular loops 2 and 3 of the calcitonin receptor selectively modify agonist binding and efficacy. Biochem. Pharmacol. 150, 214244,  DOI: 10.1016/j.bcp.2018.02.005
  44. 44
    Wootten, D., Reynolds, C. A., Smith, K. J., Mobarec, J. C., Koole, C., Savage, E. E., Pabreja, K., Simms, J., Sridhar, R., Furness, S. G., Liu, M., Thompson, P. E., Miller, L. J., Christopoulos, A., and Sexton, P. M. (2016) The Extracellular Surface of the GLP-1 Receptor Is a Molecular Trigger for Biased Agonism,. Cell 165, 16321643,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.05.023
  45. 45
    Gkountelias, K., Tselios, T., Venihaki, M., Deraos, G., Lazaridis, I., Rassouli, O., Gravanis, A., and Liapakis, G. (2009) Alanine scanning mutagenesis of the second extracellular loop of type 1 corticotropin-releasing factor receptor revealed residues critical for peptide binding. Mol. Pharmacol. 75, 793800,  DOI: 10.1124/mol.108.052423
  46. 46
    Hollenstein, K., Kean, J., Bortolato, A., Cheng, R. K., Dore, A. S., Jazayeri, A., Cooke, R. M., Weir, M., and Marshall, F. H. (2013) Structure of class B GPCR corticotropin-releasing factor receptor 1. Nature 499, 438443,  DOI: 10.1038/nature12357

Cited By

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

This article is cited by 17 publications.

  1. Michael L. Garelja, Maggie Au, Margaret A. Brimble, Joseph J. Gingell, Erica R. Hendrikse, Annie Lovell, Nicole Prodan, Patrick M. Sexton, Andrew Siow, Christopher S. Walker, Harriet A. Watkins, Geoffrey M. Williams, Denise Wootten, Sung H. Yang, Paul W. R. Harris, Debbie L. Hay. Molecular Mechanisms of Class B GPCR Activation: Insights from Adrenomedullin Receptors. ACS Pharmacology & Translational Science 2020, 3 (2) , 246-262. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsptsci.9b00083
  2. Goeun Shin, Sung In Lim. Unveiling the biological interface of protein complexes by mass spectrometry‐coupled methods. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics 2023, 91 (5) , 593-607. https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.26459
  3. Yasmin Aydin, Irene Coin. Genetically encoded crosslinkers to address protein–protein interactions. Protein Science 2023, 32 (5) https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.4637
  4. Ilana B. Kotliar, Emily Lorenzen, Jochen M. Schwenk, Debbie L. Hay, Thomas P. Sakmar, . Elucidating the Interactome of G Protein-Coupled Receptors and Receptor Activity-Modifying Proteins. Pharmacological Reviews 2023, 75 (1) , 1-34. https://doi.org/10.1124/pharmrev.120.000180
  5. Stefan Ernicke, Irene Coin. Activation of Class B GPCR by Peptide Ligands: General Structural Aspects. 2022, 346-372. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119564782.ch10
  6. Mengya Wang, Thomas L. Duong, Brandon J. Rea, Jayme S. Waite, Michael W. Huebner, Harold C. Flinn, Andrew F. Russo, Levi P. Sowers. CGRP Administration Into the Cerebellum Evokes Light Aversion, Tactile Hypersensitivity, and Nociceptive Squint in Mice. Frontiers in Pain Research 2022, 3 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpain.2022.861598
  7. Sarina Rudolf, Kerstin Kaempf, Oanh Vu, Jens Meiler, Annette G. Beck‐Sickinger, Irene Coin. Binding of Natural Peptide Ligands to the Neuropeptide Y 5 Receptor. Angewandte Chemie 2022, 134 (5) https://doi.org/10.1002/ange.202108738
  8. Sarina Rudolf, Kerstin Kaempf, Oanh Vu, Jens Meiler, Annette G. Beck‐Sickinger, Irene Coin. Binding of Natural Peptide Ligands to the Neuropeptide Y 5 Receptor. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 2022, 61 (5) https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202108738
  9. Aimilia Lydia Kalafateli, Tugce Munise Satir, Daniel Vallöf, Henrik Zetterberg, Elisabet Jerlhag. An amylin and calcitonin receptor agonist modulates alcohol behaviors by acting on reward-related areas in the brain. Progress in Neurobiology 2021, 200 , 101969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2020.101969
  10. Levi P. Sowers, Mengya Wang, Brandon J. Rea, Rebecca J. Taugher, Adisa Kuburas, Youngcho Kim, John A. Wemmie, Christopher S. Walker, Debbie L. Hay, Andrew F. Russo. Stimulation of Posterior Thalamic Nuclei Induces Photophobic Behavior in Mice. Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain 2020, 60 (9) , 1961-1981. https://doi.org/10.1111/head.13917
  11. Anette Kaiser, Irene Coin. Capturing Peptide–GPCR Interactions and Their Dynamics. Molecules 2020, 25 (20) , 4724. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25204724
  12. Ryoji Miyazaki, Yoshinori Akiyama, Hiroyuki Mori. A photo-cross-linking approach to monitor protein dynamics in living cells. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects 2020, 1864 (2) , 129317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagen.2019.03.003
  13. Jing Zhu, Mahdieh Dagina Pedersen, Laraib Sabbah Ahmed, Bahareh Abdolalizadeh, Anne-Sofie Grell, Jais Oliver Berg, Peter Waaben Thulstrup, Henrik Franzyk, Lars Edvinsson, Anette Sams, Majid Sheykhzade, Paul Robert Hansen. Fluorescent Analogues of Human α-Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide with Potent Vasodilator Activity. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2020, 21 (4) , 1343. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21041343
  14. Lauren R. Yule, Michael L. Garelja, Erica R. Hendrikse, Joseph J. Gingell, David R. Poyner, Paul W. H. Harris, Margaret A. Brimble, Debbie L. Hay. A potent fluorescent calcitonin gene‐related peptide analogue enables visualization of receptor internalization. Peptide Science 2019, 111 (6) https://doi.org/10.1002/pep2.24126
  15. Pierre Paoletti, Graham C. R. Ellis-Davies, Alexandre Mourot. Optical control of neuronal ion channels and receptors. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2019, 20 (9) , 514-532. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41583-019-0197-2
  16. , Alexander R. Nödling, Luke A. Spear, Thomas L. Williams, Louis Y.P. Luk, Yu-Hsuan Tsai. Using genetically incorporated unnatural amino acids to control protein functions in mammalian cells. Essays in Biochemistry 2019, 63 (2) , 237-266. https://doi.org/10.1042/EBC20180042
  17. Yi-Lynn Liang, Maryam Khoshouei, Giuseppe Deganutti, Alisa Glukhova, Cassandra Koole, Thomas S. Peat, Mazdak Radjainia, Jürgen M. Plitzko, Wolfgang Baumeister, Laurence J. Miller, Deborah L. Hay, Arthur Christopoulos, Christopher A. Reynolds, Denise Wootten, Patrick M. Sexton. Cryo-EM structure of the active, Gs-protein complexed, human CGRP receptor. Nature 2018, 561 (7724) , 492-497. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0535-y
  • Abstract

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. cAMP production on HEK293T cells transfected with CLR and RAMP1 and exposed to CGRP or 15-Fluo CGRP for 15 min. Values are means ± the standard error of the mean (SEM); n = 3 independent experiments.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. Fluorescence of solubilized HEK293T cell membranes from cells transfected with RAMP1 and CLR containing azF substitutions at the indicated residues. Membranes were exposed to 15-Fluo CGRP in the presence or absence of UV light. D94, H114, W121, and N128 are all within 5 Å of bound CGRP; (10) other residues are 7–10 Å away. Values are means ± SEM; n = 3. *P < 0.05, and **P < 0.01; values of total labeling that are significantly different from the nonspecific values in the paired control samples, i.e., in the absence of UV light.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. Fluorescence of solubilized HEK293T cell membranes from cells transfected with RAMP1 and CLR containing azF substitutions at the indicated residues. Membranes were exposed to 15-Fluo CGRP in the presence or absence of UV light. The values are the specific labeling, following subtraction of the nonspecific from total bound fluorescence. Values are means ± SEM; n = 3–6. *P < 0.05; values for which total labeling is significantly different from the nonspecific values in the paired control samples, i.e., in the absence of UV light. Nonspecific labeling ranged from 2247 to 5759 AU.

    Figure 4

    Figure 4. Tyrosine scan of ECL2. Potency of human α-CGRP at stimulating cAMP production in HEK293T cells transfected with CLR (WT or mutants) and RAMP1. Values are means ± SEM; n = 3.

    Figure 5

    Figure 5. Fluorescence of solubilized HEK293T cell membranes from cells transfected with RAMP1 and CLR containing azF substitutions at the indicated residues. Membranes were exposed to 15-Fluo CGRP in the presence or absence of UV light. Values are means ± SEM; n = 3. *P < 0.05; values of total labeling significantly different from the nonspecific values in the paired control samples, i.e., in the absence of UV light.

    Figure 6

    Figure 6. Molecular model of the CLR (brown ribbon)/RAMP1 (blue ribbon; TM region omitted for the sake of clarity) complex with bound CGRP (pink ribbon). (A) Detail of predicted interactions of CGRP with I284 and L291. (B) Predicted position of bound CGRP with residues on the periphery of the binding site. CLR residues shown in space-filling mode; CGRP residues colored green. The models can be viewed online using Molecule Viewer (39) at https://bit.ly/2FnQAHp (recommended browsers are Google Chrome in incognito mode or Firefox). (C) Full length structure of the CLR complex. The positions of TM5 and helix 8 are highlighted to aid orientation.

    Figure 7

    Figure 7. Comparison of the ability of [Leu12Ala]- and [Leu16Ala]-human α-CGRP (A) to stimulate cAMP in HEK293S cells transfected with HA-CLR and myc-RAMP1 or (B) to displace [125I]CGRP at the CGRP receptor. Values are means ± SEM; n = 3 or 4.

  • References

    ARTICLE SECTIONS
    Jump To

    This article references 46 other publications.

    1. 1
      Hay, D. L., Garelja, M. L., Poyner, D. R., and Walker, C. S. (2018) Update on the pharmacology of calcitonin/CGRP family of peptides: IUPHAR Review 25. Br. J. Pharmacol. 175, 317,  DOI: 10.1111/bph.14075
    2. 2
      Hay, D. L. and Walker, C. S. (2017) CGRP and its receptors. Headache 57, 625636,  DOI: 10.1111/head.13064
    3. 3
      Hoare, S. R. (2005) Mechanisms of peptide and nonpeptide ligand binding to Class B G-protein-coupled receptors.. Drug Discovery Today 10, 417427,  DOI: 10.1016/S1359-6446(05)03370-2
    4. 4
      Zhang, H., Qiao, A., Yang, D., Yang, L., Dai, A., de Graaf, C., Reedtz-Runge, S., Dharmarajan, V., Zhang, H., Han, G. W., Grant, T. D., Sierra, R. G., Weierstall, U., Nelson, G., Liu, W., Wu, Y., Ma, L., Cai, X., Lin, G., Wu, X., Geng, Z., Dong, Y., Song, G., Griffin, P. R., Lau, J., Cherezov, V., Yang, H., Hanson, M. A., Stevens, R. C., Zhao, Q., Jiang, H., Wang, M. W., and Wu, B. (2017) Structure of the full-length glucagon class B G-protein-coupled receptor. Nature 546, 259264,  DOI: 10.1038/nature22363
    5. 5
      Jazayeri, A., Rappas, M., Brown, A. J. H., Kean, J., Errey, J. C., Robertson, N. J., Fiez-Vandal, C., Andrews, S. P., Congreve, M., Bortolato, A., Mason, J. S., Baig, A. H., Teobald, I., Dore, A. S., Weir, M., Cooke, R. M., and Marshall, F. H. (2017) Crystal structure of the GLP-1 receptor bound to a peptide agonist. Nature 546, 254258,  DOI: 10.1038/nature22800
    6. 6
      Zhang, H., Qiao, A., Yang, L., Van Eps, N., Frederiksen, K. S., Yang, D., Dai, A., Cai, X., Zhang, H., Yi, C., Cao, C., He, L., Yang, H., Lau, J., Ernst, O. P., Hanson, M. A., Stevens, R. C., Wang, M. W., Reedtz-Runge, S., Jiang, H., Zhao, Q., and Wu, B. (2018) Structure of the glucagon receptor in complex with a glucagon analogue. Nature 553, 106110,  DOI: 10.1038/nature25153
    7. 7
      Liang, Y. L., Khoshouei, M., Glukhova, A., Furness, S. G. B., Zhao, P., Clydesdale, L., Koole, C., Truong, T. T., Thal, D. M., Lei, S., Radjainia, M., Danev, R., Baumeister, W., Wang, M. W., Miller, L. J., Christopoulos, A., Sexton, P. M., and Wootten, D. (2018) Phase-plate cryo-EM structure of a biased agonist-bound human GLP-1 receptor-Gs complex. Nature 555, 121125,  DOI: 10.1038/nature25773
    8. 8
      Zhang, Y., Sun, B., Feng, D., Hu, H., Chu, M., Qu, Q., Tarrasch, J. T., Li, S., Sun Kobilka, T., Kobilka, B. K., and Skiniotis, G. (2017) Cryo-EM structure of the activated GLP-1 receptor in complex with a G protein. Nature 546, 248253,  DOI: 10.1038/nature22394
    9. 9
      Liang, Y. L., Khoshouei, M., Radjainia, M., Zhang, Y., Glukhova, A., Tarrasch, J., Thal, D. M., Furness, S. G. B., Christopoulos, G., Coudrat, T., Danev, R., Baumeister, W., Miller, L. J., Christopoulos, A., Kobilka, B. K., Wootten, D., Skiniotis, G., and Sexton, P. M. (2017) Phase-plate cryo-EM structure of a class B GPCR-G-protein complex. Nature 546, 118123,  DOI: 10.1038/nature22327
    10. 10
      Booe, J. M., Walker, C. S., Barwell, J., Kuteyi, G., Simms, J., Jamaluddin, M. A., Warner, M. L., Bill, R. M., Harris, P. W., Brimble, M. A., Poyner, D. R., Hay, D. L., and Pioszak, A. A. (2015) Structural Basis for Receptor Activity-Modifying Protein-Dependent Selective Peptide Recognition by a G Protein-Coupled Receptor. Mol. Cell 58, 10401052,  DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.04.018
    11. 11
      Woolley, M. J., Reynolds, C. A., Simms, J., Walker, C. S., Mobarec, J. C., Garelja, M. L., Conner, A. C., Poyner, D. R., and Hay, D. L. (2017) Receptor activity-modifying protein dependent and independent activation mechanisms in the coupling of calcitonin gene-related peptide and adrenomedullin receptors to Gs. Biochem. Pharmacol. 142, 96110,  DOI: 10.1016/j.bcp.2017.07.005
    12. 12
      Woolley, M. J., Simms, J., Mobarec, J. C., Reynolds, C. A., Poyner, D. R., and Conner, A. C. (2017) Understanding the molecular functions of the second extracellular loop (ECL2) of the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor using a comprehensive mutagenesis approach. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 454, 3949,  DOI: 10.1016/j.mce.2017.05.034
    13. 13
      Woolley, M. J., Simms, J., Uddin, S., Poyner, D. R., and Conner, A. C. (2017) Relative Antagonism of Mutants of the CGRP Receptor Extracellular Loop 2 Domain (ECL2) Using a Truncated Competitive Antagonist (CGRP8–37): Evidence for the Dual Involvement of ECL2 in the Two-Domain Binding Model. Biochemistry 56, 38773880,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.biochem.7b00077
    14. 14
      Woolley, M. J., Watkins, H. A., Taddese, B., Karakullukcu, Z. G., Barwell, J., Smith, K. J., Hay, D. L., Poyner, D. R., Reynolds, C. A., and Conner, A. C. (2013) The role of ECL2 in CGRP receptor activation: a combined modelling and experimental approach,. J. R. Soc., Interface 10, 20130589,  DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2013.0589
    15. 15
      Vohra, S., Taddese, B., Conner, A. C., Poyner, D. R., Hay, D. L., Barwell, J., Reeves, P. J., Upton, G. J., and Reynolds, C. A. (2013) Similarity between class A and class B G-protein-coupled receptors exemplified through calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor modelling and mutagenesis studies, Journal of the Royal Society. J. R. Soc., Interface 10, 20120846,  DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2012.0846
    16. 16
      Dong, M. and Miller, L. J. (2006) Use of photoaffinity labeling to understand the molecular basis of ligand binding to the secretin receptor. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1070, 248264,  DOI: 10.1196/annals.1317.023
    17. 17
      Wang, L., Brock, A., Herberich, B., and Schultz, P. G. (2001) Expanding the genetic code of Escherichia coli. Science 292, 498500,  DOI: 10.1126/science.1060077
    18. 18
      Grunbeck, A. and Sakmar, T. P. (2013) Probing G protein-coupled receptor-ligand interactions with targeted photoactivatable cross-linkers. Biochemistry 52, 86258632,  DOI: 10.1021/bi401300y
    19. 19
      Valentin-Hansen, L., Park, M., Huber, T., Grunbeck, A., Naganathan, S., Schwartz, T. W., and Sakmar, T. P. (2014) Mapping substance P binding sites on the neurokinin-1 receptor using genetic incorporation of a photoreactive amino acid. J. Biol. Chem. 289, 1804518054,  DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M113.527085
    20. 20
      Park, M., Sivertsen, B. B., Els-Heindl, S., Huber, T., Holst, B., Beck-Sickinger, A. G., Schwartz, T. W., and Sakmar, T. P. (2015) Bioorthogonal Labeling of Ghrelin Receptor to Facilitate Studies of Ligand-Dependent Conformational Dynamics. Chem. Biol. 22, 14311436,  DOI: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2015.09.014
    21. 21
      Coin, I., Katritch, V., Sun, T., Xiang, Z., Siu, F. Y., Beyermann, M., Stevens, R. C., and Wang, L. (2013) Genetically encoded chemical probes in cells reveal the binding path of urocortin-I to CRF class B GPCR. Cell 155, 12581269,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.11.008
    22. 22
      Seidel, L., Zarzycka, B., Zaidi, S. A., Katritch, V., and Coin, I. (2017) Structural insight into the activation of a class B G-protein-coupled receptor by peptide hormones in live human cells. eLife 6, e27711,  DOI: 10.7554/eLife.27711
    23. 23
      Coin, I., Perrin, M. H., Vale, W. W., and Wang, L. (2011) Photo-cross-linkers incorporated into G-protein-coupled receptors in mammalian cells: a ligand comparison, Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 50, 80778081,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201102646
    24. 24
      Koole, C., Reynolds, C. A., Mobarec, J. C., Hick, C., Sexton, P. M., and Sakmar, T. P. (2017) Genetically encoded photocross-linkers determine the biological binding site of exendin-4 peptide in the N-terminal domain of the intact human glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R). J. Biol. Chem. 292, 71317144,  DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M117.779496
    25. 25
      Hay, D. L., Harris, P. W., Kowalczyk, R., Brimble, M. A., Rathbone, D. L., Barwell, J., Conner, A. C., and Poyner, D. R. (2014) Structure-activity relationships of the N-terminus of calcitonin gene-related peptide: key roles of alanine-5 and threonine-6 in receptor activation. Br. J. Pharmacol. 171, 415426,  DOI: 10.1111/bph.12464
    26. 26
      Wöhr, T. and Mutter, M. (1995) Pseudo-prolines in peptide synthesis: Direct insertion of serine and threonine derived oxazolidines in dipeptides. Tetrahedron Lett. 36, 38473848,  DOI: 10.1016/0040-4039(95)00667-2
    27. 27
      Fischer, R., Mader, O., Jung, G., and Brock, R. (2003) Extending the Applicability of Carboxyfluorescein in Solid-Phase Synthesis. Bioconjugate Chem. 14, 653660,  DOI: 10.1021/bc025658b
    28. 28
      Harris, P. W. R., Lee, D. J., and Brimble, M. A. (2012) A slow gradient approach for the purification of synthetic polypeptides by reversed phase high performance liquid chromatography,. J. Pept. Sci. 18, 549555,  DOI: 10.1002/psc.2432
    29. 29
      Ye, S., Kohrer, C., Huber, T., Kazmi, M., Sachdev, P., Yan, E. C., Bhagat, A., RajBhandary, U. L., and Sakmar, T. P. (2008) Site-specific incorporation of keto amino acids into functional G protein-coupled receptors using unnatural amino acid mutagenesis. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 15251533,  DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M707355200
    30. 30
      Garelja, M. L., Walker, C. A., Siow, A., Yang, S. H., Harris, P. W. R., Brimble, M. A., Watkins, H. A., Gingell, J. J., and Hay, D. L. (2018) Receptor Activity Modifying Proteins Have Limited Effects on the Class B G Protein-Coupled Receptor Calcitonin Receptor-Like Receptor Stalk. Biochemistry 57, 14101422,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.biochem.7b01180
    31. 31
      Qi, T., Christopoulos, G., Bailey, R. J., Christopoulos, A., Sexton, P. M., and Hay, D. L. (2008) Identification of N-terminal receptor activity-modifying protein residues important for calcitonin gene-related peptide, adrenomedullin, and amylin receptor function. Mol. Pharmacol. 74, 10591071,  DOI: 10.1124/mol.108.047142
    32. 32
      Sali, A. and Blundell, T. L. (1993) Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. J. Mol. Biol. 234, 779815,  DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1993.1626
    33. 33
      Barth, P., Schonbrun, J., and Baker, D. (2007) Toward high-resolution prediction and design of transmembrane helical protein structures. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 104, 1568215687,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0702515104
    34. 34
      Watkins, H. A., Rathbone, D. L., Barwell, J., Hay, D. L., and Poyner, D. R. (2013) Structure-activity relationships for alpha-calcitonin gene-related peptide. Br. J. Pharmacol. 170, 13081322,  DOI: 10.1111/bph.12072
    35. 35
      Ulmschneider, J. P. and Ulmschneider, M. B. (2009) Sampling efficiency in explicit and implicit membrane environments studied by peptide folding simulations. Proteins: Struct., Funct., Genet. 75, 586597,  DOI: 10.1002/prot.22270
    36. 36
      Humphrey, W., Dalke, A., and Schulten, K. (1996) VMD - Visual Molecular Dynamics. J. Mol. Graphics 14, 3338,  DOI: 10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5
    37. 37
      Howitt, S. G., Kilk, K., Wang, Y., Smith, D. M., Langel, U., and Poyner, D. R. (2003) The role of the 8–18 helix of CGRP8–37 in mediating high affinity binding to CGRP receptors; coulombic and steric interactions,. Br. J. Pharmacol. 138, 325332,  DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0705040
    38. 38
      Watkins, H. A., Chakravarthy, M., Abhayawardana, R. S., Gingell, J. J., Garelja, M., Pardamwar, M., McElhinney, J. M., Lathbridge, A., Constantine, A., Harris, P. W., Yuen, T. Y., Brimble, M. A., Barwell, J., Poyner, D. R., Woolley, M. J., Conner, A. C., Pioszak, A. A., Reynolds, C. A., and Hay, D. L. (2016) Receptor Activity-modifying Proteins 2 and 3 Generate Adrenomedullin Receptor Subtypes with Distinct Molecular Properties. J. Biol. Chem. 291, 1165711675,  DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M115.688218
    39. 39
      Balo, A. R., Wang, M., and Ernst, O. P. (2017) Accessible virtual reality of biomolecular structural models using the Autodesk Molecule Viewer. Nat. Methods 14, 11221123,  DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.4506
    40. 40
      Barwell, J., Conner, A., and Poyner, D. R. (2011) Extracellular loops 1 and 3 and their associated transmembrane regions of the calcitonin receptor-like receptor are needed for CGRP receptor function. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Mol. Cell Res. 1813, 19061916,  DOI: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2011.06.005
    41. 41
      Barwell, J., Miller, P. S., Donnelly, D., and Poyner, D. R. (2010) Mapping interaction sites within the N-terminus of the calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor; the role of residues 23–60 of the calcitonin receptor-like receptor. Peptides 31, 170176,  DOI: 10.1016/j.peptides.2009.10.021
    42. 42
      Hoang, H. N., Song, K., Hill, T. A., Derksen, D. R., Edmonds, D. J., Kok, W. M., Limberakis, C., Liras, S., Loria, P. M., Mascitti, V., Mathiowetz, A. M., Mitchell, J. M., Piotrowski, D. W., Price, D. A., Stanton, R. V., Suen, J. Y., Withka, J. M., Griffith, D. A., and Fairlie, D. P. (2015) Short Hydrophobic Peptides with Cyclic Constraints Are Potent Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor (GLP-1R) Agonists. J. Med. Chem. 58, 40804085,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b00166
    43. 43
      Dal Maso, E., Zhu, Y., Pham, V., Reynolds, C. A., Deganutti, G., Hick, C. A., Yang, D., Christopoulos, A., Hay, D. L., Wang, M. W., Sexton, P. M., Furness, S. G. B., and Wootten, D. (2018) Extracellular loops 2 and 3 of the calcitonin receptor selectively modify agonist binding and efficacy. Biochem. Pharmacol. 150, 214244,  DOI: 10.1016/j.bcp.2018.02.005
    44. 44
      Wootten, D., Reynolds, C. A., Smith, K. J., Mobarec, J. C., Koole, C., Savage, E. E., Pabreja, K., Simms, J., Sridhar, R., Furness, S. G., Liu, M., Thompson, P. E., Miller, L. J., Christopoulos, A., and Sexton, P. M. (2016) The Extracellular Surface of the GLP-1 Receptor Is a Molecular Trigger for Biased Agonism,. Cell 165, 16321643,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.05.023
    45. 45
      Gkountelias, K., Tselios, T., Venihaki, M., Deraos, G., Lazaridis, I., Rassouli, O., Gravanis, A., and Liapakis, G. (2009) Alanine scanning mutagenesis of the second extracellular loop of type 1 corticotropin-releasing factor receptor revealed residues critical for peptide binding. Mol. Pharmacol. 75, 793800,  DOI: 10.1124/mol.108.052423
    46. 46
      Hollenstein, K., Kean, J., Bortolato, A., Cheng, R. K., Dore, A. S., Jazayeri, A., Cooke, R. M., Weir, M., and Marshall, F. H. (2013) Structure of class B GPCR corticotropin-releasing factor receptor 1. Nature 499, 438443,  DOI: 10.1038/nature12357

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

You’ve supercharged your research process with ACS and Mendeley!

STEP 1:
Click to create an ACS ID

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

MENDELEY PAIRING EXPIRED
Your Mendeley pairing has expired. Please reconnect