ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
My Activity
CONTENT TYPES

Figure 1Loading Img

Noncovalent Protein–Pseudorotaxane Assembly Incorporating an Extended Arm Calix[8]arene with α-Helical Recognition Properties

  • Niamh M. Mockler
    Niamh M. Mockler
    School of Chemistry, National University of Ireland Galway, University Road, Galway, H91 TK33, Ireland
  • Kiefer O. Ramberg
    Kiefer O. Ramberg
    School of Chemistry, National University of Ireland Galway, University Road, Galway, H91 TK33, Ireland
  • Francesca Guagnini
    Francesca Guagnini
    School of Chemistry, National University of Ireland Galway, University Road, Galway, H91 TK33, Ireland
  • Colin L. Raston
    Colin L. Raston
    Flinders Institute for Nanoscale Science and Technology, College of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South 5042, Australia
  • , and 
  • Peter B. Crowley*
    Peter B. Crowley
    School of Chemistry, National University of Ireland Galway, University Road, Galway, H91 TK33, Ireland
    *Email: [email protected]. Phone: +353 91 49 24 80.
Cite this: Cryst. Growth Des. 2021, 21, 3, 1424–1427
Publication Date (Web):February 8, 2021
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.cgd.0c01717

Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under

CC-BY 4.0.
  • Open Access

Article Views

1250

Altmetric

-

Citations

LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICS
PDF (3 MB)
Supporting Info (1)»

Abstract

Water-soluble, anionic calix[n]arenes are useful receptors for protein recognition and assembly. For example, sulfonato-calix[8]arene (sclx8) can encapsulate proteins and direct their assembly into porous frameworks. In this work, we turned our attention to an “extended arm” calixarene with 16 phenyl rings. We hypothesized that this larger receptor would have increased capacity for protein masking/encapsulation. A cocrystal structure of p-benzyl-sulfonato-calix[8]arene (b-sclx8) and cytochrome c (cyt c) revealed a surprising assembly. A pseudorotaxane comprising a stack of three b-sclx8 molecules threaded by polyethylene glycol (PEG) was bound to the protein. The trimeric b-sclx8 stack, a tubelike structure with a highly charged surface, mediated assembly via a new mode of protein recognition. The calixarene stack presents four hydrophobic grooves, each of which binds to one cyt c by accommodating the N-terminal α-helix. This unprecedented binding mode suggests new possibilities for supramolecular protein chemistry.

This publication is licensed under

CC-BY 4.0.
  • cc licence
  • by licence

Synopsis

Extended arm calix[8]arene self-assembles as a trimeric stack with hydrophobic grooves that accommodate an α-helix of cytochrome c. The calixarene stack is threaded by polyethylene to yield a pseudorotaxane.

The complex topology of protein surfaces presents ample opportunity for recognition by synthetic molecules, resulting in diverse functions. (1−4) Small molecules that occupy α-helical-binding grooves on a protein surface can be applied to inhibit protein–protein interactions. (1) Supramolecular receptors, such as cucurbit[n]urils (5−8) and calix[n]arenes, (9−20) that target specific side chains have applications in controlled protein assembly and noncovalent PEGylation of biopharmaceuticals. Water-soluble, anionic calixarenes have useful recognition properties arising from their affinity for cationic residues (Lys, Arg). The commercially available sulfonato-calix[n]arenes (sclxn) are gaining traction as off-the-shelf mediators of protein assembly. Acting as “molecular glues”, sclxn can mediate protein oligomerization and direct the packing of protein frameworks. (14,16,18,20) Such frameworks provide a foundation for biodegradable and biocompatible materials with potential applications in drug delivery, catalysis, protein-based coatings, and more. (2,3,21) Additionally, calixarenes can be employed in mechanically interlocked molecules (MIMs), including rotaxanes and catenanes. (22−26) Consequently, there is opportunity to generate MIMs with protein recognition capacity, providing new types of biohybrid materials and/or molecular machines. Here, we describe the protein recognition and assembly activity of p-benzyl-sulfonato-calix[8]arene (b-sclx8, Figure 1), an extended arm calixarene. (27)

Figure 1

Figure 1. Sulfonato-calix[8]arene (sclx8) and p-benzyl-sulfonato-calix[8]arene (b-sclx8).

Crystal structures of cationic proteins in complex with differently functionalized calix[4]arenes, (9,12,13,15,16,19) calix[6]arenes, (11,16,17) and calix[8]arenes (14,16,18) have highlighted the advantages of larger calixarene hosts. The inherent flexibility of sclx6 and sclx8 compared to the bowl-shaped sclx4 facilitates topological molding to protein surfaces and greater surface coverage. Our recently reported crystal structures have established that sclx8 (Figure 1) can mask up to ∼30% of the cytochrome c (cyt c) surface. (14) Autoregulated assembly of cyt c was achieved, with tetramerization at 1 equiv and oligomer disassembly at ≥3 equiv of sclx8. (14) Furthermore, crystalline frameworks of cyt c and sclx8 with varying porosities and up to ∼5 nm pore diameter were obtained, as a function of the calixarene concentration. (14,18) Cyt c-sclx8 frameworks were amenable to crystal engineering, with the introduction of a small molecule effector facilitating framework duplication. (18) Considering these results, we were interested to test how a larger sclx8 derivative, b-sclx8, might manipulate the assembly of cyt c. With a solvent accessible surface area (ASA) of 2400 Å2, b-sclx8 was expected to mask a larger portion of cyt c than sclx8 (ASA = 1600 Å2). Complex formation between b-sclx8 and cyt c was studied by NMR spectroscopy and X-ray crystallography, the latter revealing an unexpected biohybrid assembly.

Initially, we investigated the interactions of cyt c and b-sclx8 via 1H–15N HSQC-monitored titrations in 20 mM sodium acetate, 50 mM NaCl at pH 5.6. Backbone amide chemical shift perturbations were observed at 2 equiv of b-sclx8. The resonances of Ala3, Lys4, Lys5, Thr12, and Lys86 were perturbed, suggesting that b-sclx8 interacted with part of the known calixarene binding patch on cyt c (Figure 2). (9,11−15,17−19) At ≥ 4 equiv of b-sclx8, the sample precipitated, resulting in signal loss in the 1H–15N HSQC spectrum and precluding further analysis. Therefore, we turned to crystallography to investigate the protein–calixarene interaction in more detail.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Overlaid regions of the 1H–15N HSQC spectra of cyt c in the absence (black contours) and presence of 2 (red) or 4 (blue) equiv of b-sclx8, in 20 mM sodium acetate and 50 mM NaCl, pH 5.6. Note the signal loss at 4 equiv of b-sclx8 due to sample precipitation.

Cocrystals of cyt c and b-sclx8 were grown by sitting drop vapor diffusion using a sparse matrix screen (Jena JCSG++ HTS). (14) Small crystals (<40 μm dimension) appeared in eight conditions of the screen. In addition to crystals, a brown precipitate formed at 2–4 equiv of b-sclx8 (Supporting Information, Figure S1). The crystallization conditions contained 20% PEG 3350 or 30% PEG 2000 and 100–200 mM salts including potassium formate, magnesium formate, ammonium formate, or ammonium chloride. Crystals were reproduced manually in similar conditions. b-sclx8 was necessary for crystallization as crystals did not grow in the absence of the macrocycle. Diffraction data were collected at SOLEIL synchrotron to 3.0 Å resolution. Several crystals were tested on two occasions, with no further improvement in resolution. The crystal structure was solved by molecular replacement in space group C121, with four cyt c molecules in the asymmetric unit (Table S1). The presence of b-sclx8 was evident in the unbiased electron density maps (Figure S2), and a stack of three b-sclx8 was modeled. A tube of electron density running through the center of the calixarene stack was modeled as PEG (vide infra), resulting from the use of PEG as the precipitant.

In the crystal structure (PDB entry 7BBT), the b-sclx8 molecules adopt the fully extended, pleated loop conformation. The trimeric stack is ∼6.6 kDa (approximately half the mass of cyt c), ∼2.1 nm long and held together via CH−π and π–π interactions (Figure 3). In the central calixarene, the methylene bridges form CH−π bonds alternately to phenyl rings above or below in the stack. The benzyl-sulfonato arms project outward from the stack for the outer calixarenes, and point up/down for alternate substituents in the central calixarene. As a consequence of the stacking and the projections of the extended arms, the b-sclx8 trimer presents four hydrophobic grooves. Each groove accommodates the N-terminal α-helix of one cyt c by binding the methyl substituents of Thr8 and Thr12 (Figure 3). The slotting of the α-helix into the b-sclx8 groove is complemented by characteristic protein–calixarene charge–charge interactions. The side chain of Thr8 is flanked by Lys4, Lys5, and Lys11 each of which interacts with a sulfonate ion. The Thr12 side chain is flanked by Lys11 and Arg13, the latter forms a cation−π bond to b-sclx8. Thus, in contrast to sclx8, (14,16,18,20) the conformation of b-sclx8 was not altered to “fit” the protein surface, and encapsulation was not achieved. Nevertheless, the trimeric stack presents a binding patch with a hydrophobic core, and a charged periphery that complements the oppositely charged protein surface. A comparison of the NMR data (Figure 2) and the crystal structure (Figure 3) indicates similarities and differences. For example, the NMR suggests binding at Lys4 and Lys5 but not at Arg13.

Figure 3

Figure 3. (A) The N-terminal α-helix of cyt c inserts into a hydrophobic groove presented by a trimeric stack of b-sclx8. The stack is threaded by PEG (navy) giving rise to pseudorotaxane. The 2Fo-Fc electron density map (contoured at 0.5σ) is shown as a blue mesh. (B) Lys4 and Lys5 interact with the calixarene stack via salt bridges to the sulfonate ions. (C) Crystal packing in the cyt c and b-sclx8 structure. Adjacent pairs of b-sclx8 stacks are in close proximity (<6 Å). Axes denote the unit cells.

Surprisingly, the crystal structure included a PEG fragment of 29 monomers (1.3 kDa) threaded through the cavity of the trimeric b-sclx8 stack, resulting in a [4]pseudorotaxane (Figures 3 and S3). The polyether chain forms multiple van der Waals contacts with all 24 of the phenolic hydroxyls. In addition to threading the cavity, the PEG is laced via CH−π bonds around the benzyl arms projecting away from either end of the stack. There are several examples of calixarene-based pseudorotaxanes reported in the literature, including one with PEG. (22,23,25,26)

Simultaneous interaction of the stacked b-sclx8 with cyt c and PEG resulted in a multicomponent pseudorotaxane–protein assembly (Figure 3). Evidently, intermolecular CH−π and π–π stacking interactions between b-sclx8 were favored over calixarene–protein interactions and induced the formation of the calixarene stack. Similar calixarene–calixarene interactions led to a calix[6]arene dimer in a complex with cyt c, (11) and a calix[8]arene dimer in complex with a lectin. (20) Steric hindrance by the bulky extended arms may have reduced the flexibility of b-sclx8 and decreased the capacity for calixarene molding to the protein surface. The stacking of b-sclx8 resulted in a new type of protein recognition, whereby the trimeric stack presents hydrophobic grooves that can bind an α-helix. Previously, helix mimetics (including foldamers) have been used to slot into helix-accommodating grooves on the protein surface. (1,28) Here, the calixarene stack presents the groove to accommodate the protein.

In parallel to protein recognition, the b-sclx8 stack facilitated pseudorotaxane formation via PEG threading, adding to the collection of calix[8]arene-based rotaxanes reported previously. (22,23) The combination of synthetic machines (rotaxanes) and biological machines (proteins) is an innovative, but underdeveloped topic. In the first reported protein–rotaxane conjugate, a [2]rotaxane was generated via covalent linkage of a pseudorotaxane to cyt c. (29) Previously, we reported crystal structures in which small PEG fragments were trapped by calix[4]arene or calix[8]arene. (10,15,16) The pseudorotaxane of b-sclx8 and PEG reported here raises the possibility of new assembly strategies with PEGylated therapeutics.

Finally, the α-helix binding capacity of b-sclx8 mediated the construction of a novel biohybrid material. The structure is comparable to a recently reported foldamer-cyt c assembly, in which the protein was bound to cylindrical foldamer stacks, of similar size and shape to the pseudorotaxane. (30) Comparison can be made also to protein–cucurbituril cluster assemblies with high macrocycle/protein mass ratios. (7) These biohybrid materials are of interest in crystal engineering, with scope for the inclusion of another biomolecule (protein or peptide) in the assembly. Further research is necessary to investigate the possibilities arising from this novel biohybrid assembly, in particular, the α-helix recognition capacity of the trimeric b-sclx8 stack.

Supporting Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.cgd.0c01717.

  • Experimental details, electron density maps and X-ray data collection, processing, and refinement statistics (PDF)

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

  • Corresponding Author
  • Authors
    • Niamh M. Mockler - School of Chemistry, National University of Ireland Galway, University Road, Galway, H91 TK33, Ireland
    • Kiefer O. Ramberg - School of Chemistry, National University of Ireland Galway, University Road, Galway, H91 TK33, Ireland
    • Francesca Guagnini - School of Chemistry, National University of Ireland Galway, University Road, Galway, H91 TK33, Ireland
    • Colin L. Raston - Flinders Institute for Nanoscale Science and Technology, College of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South 5042, AustraliaOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0003-4753-0079
  • Notes
    The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgments

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

This research was supported by NUI Galway (College of Science and Engineering postgraduate scholarship to NMM), Royal Society of Chemistry (undergraduate bursary to NMM), NUI (travelling studentship to KOR), Irish Research Council (postdoctoral fellowship GOIPD/2019/513 to F.G.), the Australian Research Council (Discovery grant DP1092810 to C.L.R.) and Science Foundation Ireland (Grants 13/CDA/2168 and 12/RC/2275_P2 to P.B.C.). We thank SOLEIL synchrotron for beam time allocation and the staff at beamline PROXIMA-2A for their assistance. We thank R. Doohan for assistance with NMR spectroscopy.

References

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

This article references 30 other publications.

  1. 1
    Wells, J. A.; McClendon, C. L. Reaching for high-hanging fruit in drug discovery at protein–protein interfaces. Nature 2007, 450, 10011009,  DOI: 10.1038/nature06526
  2. 2
    Luo, Q.; Hou, C.; Bai, Y.; Wang, R.; Liu, J. Protein assembly: versatile approaches to construct highly ordered nanostructures. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 1357113632,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00228
  3. 3
    van Dun, S.; Ottmann, C.; Milroy, L.-G.; Brunsveld, L. Supramolecular chemistry targeting proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 1396013968,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.7b01979
  4. 4
    Supramolecular Protein Chemistry: Assembly, Architecture and Application; Crowley, P. B., Ed.; Royal Society of Chemistry: Cambridge, 2020; pp 1312.
  5. 5
    Webber, M. J.; Appel, E. A.; Vinciguerra, B.; Cortinas, A. B.; Thapa, L. S.; Jhunjhunwala, S.; Isaacs, L.; Langer, R.; Anderson, D. G. Supramolecular PEGylation of biopharmaceuticals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2016, 113, 1418914194,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1616639113
  6. 6
    de Vink, P. J.; Briels, J. M.; Schrader, T.; Milroy, L.-G.; Brunsveld, L.; Ottmann, C. A binary bivalent supramolecular assembly platform based on cucurbit[8]uril and dimeric adapter protein 14–3-3. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 89989002,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201701807
  7. 7
    Guagnini, F.; Engilberge, S.; Ramberg, K. O.; Pérez, J.; Crowley, P. B. Engineered assembly of a protein-cucurbituril biohybrid. Chem. Commun. 2020, 56, 360363,  DOI: 10.1039/C9CC07198A
  8. 8
    Guagnini, F.; Engilberge, S.; Flood, R. J.; Ramberg, K. O.; Crowley, P. B. Metal-mediated protein–cucurbituril crystalline architectures. Cryst. Growth Des. 2020, 20, 69836989,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.cgd.0c01023
  9. 9
    McGovern, R. E.; Fernandes, H.; Khan, A. R.; Power, N. P.; Crowley, P. B. Protein camouflage in cytochrome c-calixarene complexes. Nat. Chem. 2012, 4, 527533,  DOI: 10.1038/nchem.1342
  10. 10
    McGovern, R. E.; McCarthy, A. A.; Crowley, P. B. Protein assembly mediated by sulfonatocalix[4]arene. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 1041210415,  DOI: 10.1039/C4CC04897K
  11. 11
    Rennie, M. L.; Doolan, A. M.; Raston, C. L.; Crowley, P. B. Protein dimerization on a phosphonated calix[6]arene disc. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 55175521,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201701500
  12. 12
    Doolan, A. M.; Rennie, M. L.; Crowley, P. B. Protein recognition by functionalized sulfonato-calix[4]arenes. Chem. - Eur. J. 2018, 24, 984991,  DOI: 10.1002/chem.201704931
  13. 13
    Alex, J. M.; Rennie, M. L.; Volpi, S.; Sansone, F.; Casnati, A.; Crowley, P. B. Phosphonated calixarene as a “molecular glue” for protein crystallization. Cryst. Growth Des. 2018, 18, 24672473,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.cgd.8b00092
  14. 14
    Rennie, M. L.; Fox, G. C.; Pérez, J.; Crowley, P. B. Auto-regulated protein assembly on a supramolecular scaffold. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 1376413769,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201807490
  15. 15
    Mummidivarapu, V. V. S.; Rennie, M. L.; Doolan, A. M.; Crowley, P. B. Noncovalent PEGylation via sulfonatocalix[4]arene - A crystallographic proof. Bioconjugate Chem. 2018, 29, 39994003,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.8b00769
  16. 16
    Alex, J. M.; Rennie, M. L.; Engilberge, S.; Lehoczki, G.; Dorottya, H.; Fizil, A.; Batta, G.; Crowley, P. B. Calixarene-mediated assembly of a small antifungal protein. IUCrJ 2019, 6, 238247,  DOI: 10.1107/S2052252519000411
  17. 17
    Engilberge, S.; Rennie, M. L.; Crowley, P. B. Calixarene Capture of Partially Unfolded Cytochrome c. FEBS Lett. 2019, 593, 21122117,  DOI: 10.1002/1873-3468.13512
  18. 18
    Engilberge, S.; Rennie, M. L.; Dumont, E.; Crowley, P. B. Tuning protein frameworks via auxiliary supramolecular interactions. ACS Nano 2019, 13, 1034310350,  DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.9b04115
  19. 19
    Alex, J. M.; Brancatelli, G.; Volpi, S.; Bonaccorso, C.; Casnati, A.; Geremia, S.; Crowley, P. B. Probing the determinants of porosity in protein frameworks: co-crystals of cytochrome c and an octaanionic calix[4]arene. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2020, 18, 211214,  DOI: 10.1039/C9OB02275A
  20. 20
    Ramberg, K. O.; Engilberge, S.; Skorek, T.; Crowley, P. B. Facile fabrication of protein-macrocycle frameworks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.0c10697
  21. 21
    Abascal, N. C.; Regan, L. The past, present and future of protein-based materials. Open Biol. 2018, 8, 180113,  DOI: 10.1098/rsob.180113
  22. 22
    Yamagishi, T.-A.; Kawahara, A.; Kita, J.; Hoshima, M.; Umehara, A.; Ishida, S.-I.; Nakamoto, Y. In situ polycondensation of p-tert-butylphenol in the presence of poly(ethylene glycol)s for preparation of polyrotaxanes. Macromolecules 2001, 34, 65656570,  DOI: 10.1021/ma010033e
  23. 23
    Gaeta, C.; Talotta, C.; Margarucci, L.; Casapullo, A.; Neri, P. Through-the-annulus threading of the larger calix[8]arene macrocycle. J. Org. Chem. 2013, 78, 76277638,  DOI: 10.1021/jo401206j
  24. 24
    Stoddart, J. F. Mechanically interlocked molecules (MIMs) – Molecular Shuttles, Switches, and Machines (Nobel Lecture). Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 1109411125,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201703216
  25. 25
    Gaeta, C.; Talotta, C.; Neri, P. Calix[6]arene-based atropoisomeric pseudo[2]rotaxanes. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2018, 14, 21122124,  DOI: 10.3762/bjoc.14.186
  26. 26
    Orlandini, G.; Casimiro, L.; Bazzoni, M.; Cogliati, B.; Credi, A.; Lucarini, M.; Silvi, S.; Arduini, A.; Secchi, A. Synthesis and properties of a redox-switchable calix[6]arene-based molecular lasso. Org. Chem. Front. 2020, 7, 648659,  DOI: 10.1039/C9QO01379B
  27. 27
    Hubble, L. J.; Clark, T. E.; Makha, M.; Raston, C. L. Selective diameter uptake of single-walled carbon nanotubes in water using phosphonated calixarenes and ‘extended arm’ sulfonated calixarenes. J. Mater. Chem. 2008, 18, 59615966,  DOI: 10.1039/b814904f
  28. 28
    Maity, D.; Kumar, S.; Curreli, F.; Debnath, A. K.; Hamilton, A. D. α-Helix-Mimetic Foldamers for Targeting HIV-1 TAR RNA. Chem. - Eur. J. 2019, 25, 72657269,  DOI: 10.1002/chem.201900139
  29. 29
    Bruns, C. J.; Liu, H.; Francis, M. B. Near-quantitative aqueous synthesis of rotaxanes via bioconjugation to oligopeptides and proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 1530715310,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.6b10231
  30. 30
    Alex, J. M.; Corvaglia, V.; Hu, X.; Engilberge, S.; Huc, I.; Crowley, P. B. Crystal structure of a protein–aromatic foldamer composite: macromolecular chiral resolution. Chem. Commun. 2019, 55, 1108711090,  DOI: 10.1039/C9CC05330A

Cited By

This article is cited by 7 publications.

  1. Seulgi Kim, Dong Hee Lee, Ki-Min Park, Jong Hwa Jung, Shim Sung Lee, In-Hyeok Park. Unexpected Solvent-Dependent Self-Assembly of Alkali Metal Complexes of Calix[6]-mono-crown-4: Dinuclear Bowls, a Pseudo-Capsule, and a One-Dimensional Polymer. Inorganic Chemistry 2022, 61 (45) , 18213-18220. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c03020
  2. Peter B. Crowley. Protein–Calixarene Complexation: From Recognition to Assembly. Accounts of Chemical Research 2022, 55 (15) , 2019-2032. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.2c00206
  3. Aleksandra Kieliszek, Maura Malinska. Conformations of p-tert-Butylcalix[8]arene in Solvated Crystal Structures. Crystal Growth & Design 2021, 21 (12) , 6862-6871. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.cgd.1c00773
  4. Numan Yuksel, M. Ferdi Fellah. Hydrogen adsorption and sensing properties of p-tert-butylcalix[4]arene and its transition metal complexes: A DFT study. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2023, 48 (60) , 23348-23361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.12.012
  5. Stefano Volpi, Aishling Doolan, Laura Baldini, Alessandro Casnati, Peter B. Crowley, Francesco Sansone. Complex Formation between Cytochrome c and a Tetra-alanino-calix[4]arene. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2022, 23 (23) , 15391. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232315391
  6. Kateryna Kravets, Mykola Kravets, Helena Butkiewicz, Sandra Kosiorek, Volodymyr Sashuk, Oksana Danylyuk. Electrostatic co-assembly of pillar[ n ]pyridiniums and calix[4]arene in aqueous media. CrystEngComm 2022, 24 (12) , 2213-2216. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2CE00232A
  7. B. Gassoumi, F.E. Ben Mohamed, M.E. Castro, F.J. Melendez, A. Karayel, L. Nouar, F. Madi, H. Ghalla, S. Özkınalı, V.I. Kovalenko, R. Ben Chaabane, H. Ben Ouada. In silico exploration of O-H…X2+ (X = Cu, Ag, Hg) interaction, targeted adsorption zone, charge density iso-surface, O-H proton analysis and topographic parameters theory for calix[6]arene and calix[8]arene as model. Journal of Molecular Liquids 2021, 334 , 116127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2021.116127
  • Abstract

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. Sulfonato-calix[8]arene (sclx8) and p-benzyl-sulfonato-calix[8]arene (b-sclx8).

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. Overlaid regions of the 1H–15N HSQC spectra of cyt c in the absence (black contours) and presence of 2 (red) or 4 (blue) equiv of b-sclx8, in 20 mM sodium acetate and 50 mM NaCl, pH 5.6. Note the signal loss at 4 equiv of b-sclx8 due to sample precipitation.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. (A) The N-terminal α-helix of cyt c inserts into a hydrophobic groove presented by a trimeric stack of b-sclx8. The stack is threaded by PEG (navy) giving rise to pseudorotaxane. The 2Fo-Fc electron density map (contoured at 0.5σ) is shown as a blue mesh. (B) Lys4 and Lys5 interact with the calixarene stack via salt bridges to the sulfonate ions. (C) Crystal packing in the cyt c and b-sclx8 structure. Adjacent pairs of b-sclx8 stacks are in close proximity (<6 Å). Axes denote the unit cells.

  • References

    ARTICLE SECTIONS
    Jump To

    This article references 30 other publications.

    1. 1
      Wells, J. A.; McClendon, C. L. Reaching for high-hanging fruit in drug discovery at protein–protein interfaces. Nature 2007, 450, 10011009,  DOI: 10.1038/nature06526
    2. 2
      Luo, Q.; Hou, C.; Bai, Y.; Wang, R.; Liu, J. Protein assembly: versatile approaches to construct highly ordered nanostructures. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 1357113632,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00228
    3. 3
      van Dun, S.; Ottmann, C.; Milroy, L.-G.; Brunsveld, L. Supramolecular chemistry targeting proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 1396013968,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.7b01979
    4. 4
      Supramolecular Protein Chemistry: Assembly, Architecture and Application; Crowley, P. B., Ed.; Royal Society of Chemistry: Cambridge, 2020; pp 1312.
    5. 5
      Webber, M. J.; Appel, E. A.; Vinciguerra, B.; Cortinas, A. B.; Thapa, L. S.; Jhunjhunwala, S.; Isaacs, L.; Langer, R.; Anderson, D. G. Supramolecular PEGylation of biopharmaceuticals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2016, 113, 1418914194,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1616639113
    6. 6
      de Vink, P. J.; Briels, J. M.; Schrader, T.; Milroy, L.-G.; Brunsveld, L.; Ottmann, C. A binary bivalent supramolecular assembly platform based on cucurbit[8]uril and dimeric adapter protein 14–3-3. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 89989002,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201701807
    7. 7
      Guagnini, F.; Engilberge, S.; Ramberg, K. O.; Pérez, J.; Crowley, P. B. Engineered assembly of a protein-cucurbituril biohybrid. Chem. Commun. 2020, 56, 360363,  DOI: 10.1039/C9CC07198A
    8. 8
      Guagnini, F.; Engilberge, S.; Flood, R. J.; Ramberg, K. O.; Crowley, P. B. Metal-mediated protein–cucurbituril crystalline architectures. Cryst. Growth Des. 2020, 20, 69836989,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.cgd.0c01023
    9. 9
      McGovern, R. E.; Fernandes, H.; Khan, A. R.; Power, N. P.; Crowley, P. B. Protein camouflage in cytochrome c-calixarene complexes. Nat. Chem. 2012, 4, 527533,  DOI: 10.1038/nchem.1342
    10. 10
      McGovern, R. E.; McCarthy, A. A.; Crowley, P. B. Protein assembly mediated by sulfonatocalix[4]arene. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 1041210415,  DOI: 10.1039/C4CC04897K
    11. 11
      Rennie, M. L.; Doolan, A. M.; Raston, C. L.; Crowley, P. B. Protein dimerization on a phosphonated calix[6]arene disc. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 55175521,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201701500
    12. 12
      Doolan, A. M.; Rennie, M. L.; Crowley, P. B. Protein recognition by functionalized sulfonato-calix[4]arenes. Chem. - Eur. J. 2018, 24, 984991,  DOI: 10.1002/chem.201704931
    13. 13
      Alex, J. M.; Rennie, M. L.; Volpi, S.; Sansone, F.; Casnati, A.; Crowley, P. B. Phosphonated calixarene as a “molecular glue” for protein crystallization. Cryst. Growth Des. 2018, 18, 24672473,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.cgd.8b00092
    14. 14
      Rennie, M. L.; Fox, G. C.; Pérez, J.; Crowley, P. B. Auto-regulated protein assembly on a supramolecular scaffold. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 1376413769,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201807490
    15. 15
      Mummidivarapu, V. V. S.; Rennie, M. L.; Doolan, A. M.; Crowley, P. B. Noncovalent PEGylation via sulfonatocalix[4]arene - A crystallographic proof. Bioconjugate Chem. 2018, 29, 39994003,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.8b00769
    16. 16
      Alex, J. M.; Rennie, M. L.; Engilberge, S.; Lehoczki, G.; Dorottya, H.; Fizil, A.; Batta, G.; Crowley, P. B. Calixarene-mediated assembly of a small antifungal protein. IUCrJ 2019, 6, 238247,  DOI: 10.1107/S2052252519000411
    17. 17
      Engilberge, S.; Rennie, M. L.; Crowley, P. B. Calixarene Capture of Partially Unfolded Cytochrome c. FEBS Lett. 2019, 593, 21122117,  DOI: 10.1002/1873-3468.13512
    18. 18
      Engilberge, S.; Rennie, M. L.; Dumont, E.; Crowley, P. B. Tuning protein frameworks via auxiliary supramolecular interactions. ACS Nano 2019, 13, 1034310350,  DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.9b04115
    19. 19
      Alex, J. M.; Brancatelli, G.; Volpi, S.; Bonaccorso, C.; Casnati, A.; Geremia, S.; Crowley, P. B. Probing the determinants of porosity in protein frameworks: co-crystals of cytochrome c and an octaanionic calix[4]arene. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2020, 18, 211214,  DOI: 10.1039/C9OB02275A
    20. 20
      Ramberg, K. O.; Engilberge, S.; Skorek, T.; Crowley, P. B. Facile fabrication of protein-macrocycle frameworks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.0c10697
    21. 21
      Abascal, N. C.; Regan, L. The past, present and future of protein-based materials. Open Biol. 2018, 8, 180113,  DOI: 10.1098/rsob.180113
    22. 22
      Yamagishi, T.-A.; Kawahara, A.; Kita, J.; Hoshima, M.; Umehara, A.; Ishida, S.-I.; Nakamoto, Y. In situ polycondensation of p-tert-butylphenol in the presence of poly(ethylene glycol)s for preparation of polyrotaxanes. Macromolecules 2001, 34, 65656570,  DOI: 10.1021/ma010033e
    23. 23
      Gaeta, C.; Talotta, C.; Margarucci, L.; Casapullo, A.; Neri, P. Through-the-annulus threading of the larger calix[8]arene macrocycle. J. Org. Chem. 2013, 78, 76277638,  DOI: 10.1021/jo401206j
    24. 24
      Stoddart, J. F. Mechanically interlocked molecules (MIMs) – Molecular Shuttles, Switches, and Machines (Nobel Lecture). Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 1109411125,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201703216
    25. 25
      Gaeta, C.; Talotta, C.; Neri, P. Calix[6]arene-based atropoisomeric pseudo[2]rotaxanes. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2018, 14, 21122124,  DOI: 10.3762/bjoc.14.186
    26. 26
      Orlandini, G.; Casimiro, L.; Bazzoni, M.; Cogliati, B.; Credi, A.; Lucarini, M.; Silvi, S.; Arduini, A.; Secchi, A. Synthesis and properties of a redox-switchable calix[6]arene-based molecular lasso. Org. Chem. Front. 2020, 7, 648659,  DOI: 10.1039/C9QO01379B
    27. 27
      Hubble, L. J.; Clark, T. E.; Makha, M.; Raston, C. L. Selective diameter uptake of single-walled carbon nanotubes in water using phosphonated calixarenes and ‘extended arm’ sulfonated calixarenes. J. Mater. Chem. 2008, 18, 59615966,  DOI: 10.1039/b814904f
    28. 28
      Maity, D.; Kumar, S.; Curreli, F.; Debnath, A. K.; Hamilton, A. D. α-Helix-Mimetic Foldamers for Targeting HIV-1 TAR RNA. Chem. - Eur. J. 2019, 25, 72657269,  DOI: 10.1002/chem.201900139
    29. 29
      Bruns, C. J.; Liu, H.; Francis, M. B. Near-quantitative aqueous synthesis of rotaxanes via bioconjugation to oligopeptides and proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 1530715310,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.6b10231
    30. 30
      Alex, J. M.; Corvaglia, V.; Hu, X.; Engilberge, S.; Huc, I.; Crowley, P. B. Crystal structure of a protein–aromatic foldamer composite: macromolecular chiral resolution. Chem. Commun. 2019, 55, 1108711090,  DOI: 10.1039/C9CC05330A
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information

    ARTICLE SECTIONS
    Jump To

    The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.cgd.0c01717.

    • Experimental details, electron density maps and X-ray data collection, processing, and refinement statistics (PDF)


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

You’ve supercharged your research process with ACS and Mendeley!

STEP 1:
Click to create an ACS ID

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

MENDELEY PAIRING EXPIRED
Your Mendeley pairing has expired. Please reconnect