ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
Role of Metal Selection in the Radiation Stability of Isostructural M-UiO-66 Metal–Organic Frameworks
My Activity
    Article

    Role of Metal Selection in the Radiation Stability of Isostructural M-UiO-66 Metal–Organic Frameworks
    Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

    Other Access OptionsSupporting Information (3)

    Chemistry of Materials

    Cite this: Chem. Mater. 2022, 34, 18, 8403–8417
    Click to copy citationCitation copied!
    https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.2c02170
    Published September 9, 2022
    Copyright © 2022 American Chemical Society

    Abstract

    Click to copy section linkSection link copied!
    Abstract Image

    Robust and versatile metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) have emerged as sophisticated scaffolds to meet the critical needs of the nuclear community, but their performance depends on their underexplored structural integrities in high- radiation fields. The contributions of selected metal nodes in the radiation stability of MOFs within the isostructural M-UiO-66 series (where M = Zr, Ce, Hf, Th, and Pu; Zr-UiO-66 experiments were executed in a previous work) have been determined. Ce-, Hf-, and Th-UiO-66 MOF samples were irradiated via gamma and He-ion methodologies to obtain doses up to 3 MGy and 85 MGy, respectively, the latter strikingly higher than that obtained in most other studies. Appreciable self-irradiation constituted the total absorbed doses, up to 31 MGy of the gamma-irradiated Pu-UiO-66 samples. Structural degradation was ascertained by powder X-ray diffraction, X-ray total scattering, vibrational spectroscopy, and, where possible, N2 physisorption isotherms. Diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transform spectroscopy provided atomic-level mechanistic insights to reveal that the node-linker connection was most susceptible to radiation damage. Density functional theory calculations were performed on cluster models to evaluate the binding energy of the linkers to each metal node. While the isostructures disclosed the same breakdown signatures, distinct radiation sensitivity as a function of metal selection was evident and followed the trend Hf-UiO-66 ∼ Zr-UiO-66 > Th-UiO-66 > Pu-UiO-66 > Ce-UiO-66. We anticipate that these endeavors will contribute to the rational design of radiation-resistant materials for targeted applications.

    Copyright © 2022 American Chemical Society

    Read this article

    To access this article, please review the available access options below.

    Get instant access

    Purchase Access

    Read this article for 48 hours. Check out below using your ACS ID or as a guest.

    Recommended

    Access through Your Institution

    You may have access to this article through your institution.

    Your institution does not have access to this content. Add or change your institution or let them know you’d like them to include access.

    Supporting Information

    Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

    The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.chemmater.2c02170.

    • MOF irradiation literature, irradiation methodologies, dose calculations, plutonium experimental design, characterization by PXRD, DRIFTS, Raman spectroscopy, PDF, pore size distributions, computational data, and supporting content for the metal trend discussion (PDF)

    • Optimized structure package (ZIP)

    • Computational input/output files (ZIP)

    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

    Cited By

    Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

    This article is cited by 24 publications.

    1. Matthew B. Comins, Ugras Kaplan, Jeremiah Beam, Adrianne Navarrette, Amy E. Hixon. Plutonium Speciation and Oxidation State Distributions in the Presence of Citrate. Environmental Science & Technology 2024, 58 (35) , 15766-15778. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c02803
    2. Martin Glavinović, Nancy Chou, Fisher B. Hall, Kevin L. Lesage, Benjamin S. Gelfand, Denis M. Spasyuk, Jian-Bin Lin, Robert A. Marriott, George K. H. Shimizu. Measuring Diffusion Kinetics with Zero-Length Chromatography in Isomorphous and Ultramicroporous Phosphonate Metal–Organic Frameworks. Chemistry of Materials 2024, 36 (5) , 2269-2278. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.3c02233
    3. Xiaokang Wang, Hongyan Liu, Meng Sun, Haoyang Wang, Xueying Feng, Wenmiao Chen, Xiang Feng, Weidong Fan, Daofeng Sun. Thiadiazole-Functionalized Th/Zr-UiO-66 for Efficient C2H2/CO2 Separation. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2024, 16 (6) , 7819-7825. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.3c17622
    4. Mohammad Shohel, A. Kirstin Sockwell, Amy E. Hixon, May Nyman. Plutonium and Cerium Perrhenate/Pertechnetate Coordination Polymers and Frameworks. Inorganic Chemistry 2024, 63 (4) , 2044-2052. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.3c03846
    5. Ana Arteaga, Aaron D. Nicholas, Michael A. Sinnwell, Bruce K. McNamara, Edgar C. Buck, Robert G. Surbella, III. Expanding the Transuranic Metal–Organic Framework Portfolio: The Optical Properties of Americium(III) MOF-76. Inorganic Chemistry 2023, 62 (51) , 21036-21043. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.3c02742
    6. Julie Nguyen-Sadassivame, Anaïs Massaloux, Jérémy Dhainaut, Riad Sarraf, Philippe Chantereau, Laurent Cantrel, Thierry Loiseau, Christophe Volkringer, Philippe Nérisson. Test Bench Development and Application to a Parametric Experimental Study on the Dynamic Adsorption Capacity of Noble Gases (Kr, Xe) in the Metal–Organic Framework HKUST-1. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 2023, 62 (48) , 20727-20740. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.3c03042
    7. Sara E. Skrabalak, Ramanathan Vaidhyanathan. The Chemistry of Metal Organic Framework Materials. Chemistry of Materials 2023, 35 (15) , 5713-5722. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.3c01729
    8. Songzhu Qi, Shunshun Xiong, Liangping Xiong, Hao Li, Boyu Liu, Yi Liu, Ke Xiong, Heng Yan, Kai Lv, Hewen Liu, Sheng Hu. Crystalline versus Amorphous: High-Performance Hafnium Phosphonate Framework for the Separation of Uranium and Transuranium Elements. Inorganic Chemistry 2023, 62 (28) , 10881-10886. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.3c01458
    9. Yu Ju, Zi-Jian Li, Jie Qiu, Xiaoyun Li, Junpu Yang, Zhi-Hui Zhang, Ming-Yang He, Jian-Qiang Wang, Jian Lin. Adsorption and Detection of Iodine Species by a Thorium-Based Metal–Organic Framework. Inorganic Chemistry 2023, 62 (21) , 8158-8165. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.3c00473
    10. Xingzheng Chen, Gan Li, Songtao Xiao, Wenjuan Xue, Xudong Zhao, Qingyuan Yang. Efficient Capture of Th(IV) and U(VI) by Radiation-Resistant Oxygen-Rich Ion Traps Based on a Metal–Organic Framework. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2023, 15 (20) , 25029-25040. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.3c02582
    11. Changjiang Hu, Liwei Cheng, Liheng Zhou, Zhiwen Jiang, Pingping Gan, Shuiyan Cao, Qiuhao Li, Chong Chen, Yunlong Wang, Mehran Mostafavi, Shuao Wang, Jun Ma. Radiolytic Water Splitting Sensitized by Nanoscale Metal–Organic Frameworks. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2023, 145 (9) , 5578-5588. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.3c00547
    12. Yilei Xiang, Suosu Wei, Taoxiang Wang, Huang Li, Yan Luo, Bing Shao, Ningyuan Wu, Yiji Su, Linbin Jiang, Jin Huang. Transformation of metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) under different factors. Coordination Chemistry Reviews 2025, 523 , 216263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2024.216263
    13. Chao Ma, Iván Sánchez-García, Runze Wang, Hitos Galán, Antonia G. Denkova, Pablo Serra Crespo. Radiation resistant metal–organic frameworks for the production of high specific activity 51Cr by the Szilard-Chalmers effect. Separation and Purification Technology 2025, 352 , 128212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2024.128212
    14. Dennis T. Lee, Mueed Ahmad, Peter Corkery, J. Anibal Boscoboinik, D. Howard Fairbrother, Michael Tsapatsis. Modification of ZIF‐8 Membranes for Gas Separation Using X‐ray Radiation. Angewandte Chemie 2024, https://doi.org/10.1002/ange.202419532
    15. Dennis T. Lee, Mueed Ahmad, Peter Corkery, J. Anibal Boscoboinik, D. Howard Fairbrother, Michael Tsapatsis. Modification of ZIF‐8 Membranes for Gas Separation Using X‐ray Radiation. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 2024, https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202419532
    16. Shuting Ma, Zhuoxuan Zhou, Yaofei Zhang, Renzhi Rao, Hanrao Han, Jing Liang, Zhenyuan Zhao, Fukun Bi, Ning Liu, Xiaodong Zhang. Review of irradiation treatments on MOFs and COFs: Synthesis, modification, and application. Separation and Purification Technology 2024, 339 , 126636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2024.126636
    17. Huangjie Lu, Zhaofa Zheng, Huiliang Hou, Yaoyao Bai, Jie Qiu, Jian‐Qiang Wang, Jian Lin. Fine‐Tuning X‐Ray Sensitivity in Organic–Inorganic Hybrids via an Unprecedented Mixed‐Ligand Strategy. Advanced Science 2024, 11 (1) https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202305378
    18. Yu Ju, Zi‐Jian Li, Xue Wang, Jie Qiu, Yiuhon Chan, Zhi‐Hui Zhang, Mingyang He, Jian Lin. Synthetic Control of Thorium Metal‐Organic Frameworks for Sequencing and Sensing of Radioiodine Species. Chinese Journal of Chemistry 2024, 42 (1) , 20-28. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjoc.202300435
    19. Changjiang Hu, Zhiwen Jiang, Qunyan Wu, Shuiyan Cao, Qiuhao Li, Chong Chen, Liyong Yuan, Yunlong Wang, Wenyun Yang, Jinbo Yang, Jing Peng, Weiqun Shi, Maolin Zhai, Mehran Mostafavi, Jun Ma. Selective CO2 reduction to CH3OH over atomic dual-metal sites embedded in a metal-organic framework with high-energy radiation. Nature Communications 2023, 14 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-40418-3
    20. Huangjie Lu, Jingqi Ma, Junpu Yang, Huiliang Hou, Jiacheng Lu, Jian-Qiang Wang, Yaxing Wang, Jian Lin. A ratiometric radio-photoluminescence dosimeter based on a radical excimer for X-ray detection. Chemical Communications 2023, 59 (84) , 12617-12620. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3CC03824F
    21. Xuechun Wang, Zeming Dai, Xuan Zhou, Hao Chen, Yu Cao, Jianhua Hou, Xiaozhi Wang. Recyclable thiol-modified Zr-based MOFs/hydrogel composite beads for effective removal of Hg (II). Progress in Natural Science: Materials International 2023, 33 (5) , 644-651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnsc.2023.11.009
    22. Aaron D. Nicholas, Ana Arteaga, Lucas C. Ducati, Edgar C. Buck, Jochen Autschbach, Robert G. Surbella. Insight into the Structural and Emissive Behavior of a Three‐Dimensional Americium(III) Formate Coordination Polymer. Chemistry – A European Journal 2023, 29 (41) https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.202300077
    23. Xiaofan Ding, Songtao Xiao, Ting Wang, Zucao Zeng, Xudong Zhao, Qingyuan Yang. Stability of metal-organic frameworks towards β-ray irradiation: Role of organic groups. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials 2023, 354 , 112533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2023.112533
    24. Zhaofa Zheng, Huangjie Lu, Huiliang Hou, Yaoyao Bai, Jie Qiu, Xiaofeng Guo, Jian‐Qiang Wang, Jian Lin. Stepwise Crystallization of Millimeter Scale Thorium Cluster Single Crystals as a Bifunctional Platform for X‐ray Detection and Shielding. Small 2023, 19 (10) https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202206782
    25. Changjiang Hu, Zhiwen Jiang, Qunyan Wu, Shuiyan Cao, Qiuhao Li, Chong Chen, Li-Yong Yuan, Yunlong Wang, Jing Peng, Weiqun Shi, Maolin Zhai, Mehran Mostafavi, Jun Ma. Sustainable high-energy radiation powering selective CO2 reduction to CH3OH over atomic dual-metal-sites embedded metal-organic framework. 2023https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2525130/v1

    Chemistry of Materials

    Cite this: Chem. Mater. 2022, 34, 18, 8403–8417
    Click to copy citationCitation copied!
    https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.2c02170
    Published September 9, 2022
    Copyright © 2022 American Chemical Society

    Article Views

    2799

    Altmetric

    -

    Citations

    Learn about these metrics

    Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

    Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

    The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.