logo
CONTENT TYPES

Highly Uniform Bilayer Graphene on Epitaxial Cu–Ni(111) Alloy

View Author Information
Interdisciplinary Graduate School of Engineering Sciences, Art, Science, and Technology Center for Cooperative Research (KASTEC), and §Research and Education Center of Carbon Resources, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 816-8580, Japan
Kwansei Gakuin University, Hyogo 669-1337, Japan
NTT Basic Research Laboratories, NTT Corporation, Kanagawa 243-0198, Japan
# Graduate School of Pure and Applied Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba 305-8577, Japan
PRESTO, Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST), Saitama 332-0012, Japan
Cite this: Chem. Mater. 2016, 28, 13, 4583–4592
Publication Date (Web):May 15, 2016
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b01137
Copyright © 2016 American Chemical Society
ACS Editors’ ChoiceACS Editors’ Choice
Article Views
4517
Altmetric
-
Citations
LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICS

Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.

PDF (9 MB)
Supporting Info (1)»

Abstract

Band gap opening in bilayer graphene (BLG) under a vertical electric field is important for the realization of high performance graphene-based semiconductor devices, and thus, the synthesis of uniform and large-area BLG is required. Here we demonstrate the synthesis of a highly uniform BLG film by chemical vapor deposition (CVD) over epitaxial Cu−Ni (111) binary alloy catalysts. The relative concentration of Ni and Cu as well as the growth temperature and cooling profile was found to strongly influence the uniformity of the BLG. In particular, a slow cooling process after switching off the carbon feedstock is important for obtaining a uniform second layer, covering more than 90% of the total area. Moreover, low-energy electron microscopy (LEEM) study revealed the second layer grows underneath the first layer. We also investigated the stacking order by Raman spectroscopy and LEEM and found that 70–80% of bilayer graphene has Bernal stacking. The metastable 30°-rotated orientations were also observed both in the upper and lower layers. From our experimental observations, a new growth mode is proposed; the first layer grows during the CH4 supply on Cu–Ni alloy surface, while the second layer is segregated from the bulk alloy during the cooling process. Our work highlights the growth mechanism of BLG and offers a promising route to synthesize uniform and large-area BLG for future electronic devices.

Introduction

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

Extraordinary high carrier mobility as well as unique single atom-thick layered structure makes monolayer graphene (MLG) an attractive material for future electronic and photonic devices with high mechanical flexibility and optical transparency such as field-effect transistors, flexible devices, integrated circuits, chemical sensors, and optical communication.(1, 2) However, the absence of a band gap in the MLG hinders the development of graphene-based semiconductor devices. Thus, several methods to open a band gap in graphene have been proposed such as synthesis of one-dimensional graphene nanoribbons (GNRs),(3) applying mechanical strain,(4) chemical functionalization or molecular doping,(5) and vertical biasing in bilayer graphene (BLG).(6-13) It has been demonstrated that in the presence of a vertical electric field applied from both top and bottom dielectric gates, a band gap of BLG can be opened to be 0.2–0.3 eV.(6-8) Compared to the other mentioned methods, vertical biasing in BLG is suitable for the fabrication of devices in large areas using top-down methods. Also, BLG is mechanically and chemically more robust than MLG(14-16) and does not require control of edge structures like GNRs,(17) making it a good candidate for practical applications.
However, synthesis of wafer-scale BLG with high uniformity is still a challenging issue. Chemical vapor deposition (CVD) growth of uniform BLG has been reported on Cu foils by controlling the growth conditions,(18-23) in spite that the low carbon solubility of Cu is known to selectively give MLG.(24) However, this self-limiting growth mechanism on Cu catalyst makes it difficult to obtain a uniform BLG sheet, and in most of the previous works, smaller bilayer grains are observed mainly at the center of hexagonal grains of MLG,(25-30) which indicates slower growth rate for the second layer as compared to the first layer. Once the first layer fully covers the Cu surface, the second layer growth ceases because the catalytically active Cu surface is blocked from CH4 gas. Thus, it is not straightforward to synthesize uniform BLG on Cu catalyst. Also, there is discussion on the growth mechanism of CVD-grown BLG in terms of the growth order of the upper and lower layers; some groups claim that the second layer grows on top of the first layer,(19, 20, 22, 23) while other groups claim the second layer grows below the first layer.(26, 27, 31-33)
Binary metal catalysts, such as Cu−Ni and Cu−Co foils, have also been investigated to obtain uniform BLG,(34-37) which are expected to overcome the limit of self-limiting property of Cu catalyst, because Ni and Co have higher carbon solubility than Cu. However, the addition of Ni (or Co) to Cu catalyst can deteriorate the controllability of layer numbers because in principle the number of graphene layers tends to have some distribution ranging from monolayer to multilayers. Being different from monolayer growth on Cu, there is no reason to terminate the growth by the second layer so that the alloy catalysts sometimes result in the formation of nonuniform layer distribution with the main peak at the bilayer.(35) Therefore, it is quite challenging to selectively synthesize BLG by CVD while suppressing the growth of monolayer and >3 layer graphene. In addition, commercially available metal alloy foils have prefixed metal concentrations, and thus, it is difficult to finely tune the BLG coverage.(34) Furthermore, the investigation into the mechanism of selective growth of BLG is important for future wafer-scale production with high reproducibility.
Stacking order in BLG is also important. Most of the previous CVD studies rely only on Raman spectroscopy, and the relative intensity of 2D band to G band (I2D/IG) and full line width of half-maximum of 2D band (FWHW2D) are used to distinguish the AB (Bernal) and twist stacking.(20) However, the interlayer twist angle can be more complicated, which is sometimes difficult to judge only by the Raman spectroscopy.(30, 37, 38)
Here, we demonstrate the uniform synthesis of BLG on epitaxial Cu–Ni (111) alloy films deposited on sapphire by optimizing the Cu–Ni ratio as well as the growth conditions. Uniform BLG with 93% coverage was realized. The low-energy electron microscope (LEEM) measurement indicates that the second layer grows underneath the first layer. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations were also performed to understand the interaction between metal surface and graphene. On the basis of these results, we discuss the growth mechanism and stacking order of our BLG on Cu–Ni(111) alloy catalyst.

Experimental Methods

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

For the growth of BLG, the stacked films of Cu and Ni deposited on c-plane sapphire (α-Al2O3(0001)) were used as catalyst.(39, 40) Thin films of Cu and Ni were sequentially deposited by radio frequency (RF) magnetron sputtering machines (Shibaura 4ES and i-Miller) without being exposed to air to avoid oxidation at the interface between these two metal films. The substrate temperature was set at ∼420 and ∼200 °C for the deposition of Ni and Cu films, respectively, to obtain high crystallinity and smooth surface while avoiding surface oxidation. We varied the Cu/Ni nominal ratio by changing the thicknesses of the Cu and Ni films, while the total thickness was fixed to 500 nm. For example, to prepare 20% Ni, 100 nm Ni and 400 nm Cu were deposited. This nominal 20% Ni corresponds to 21.2 atomic % of Ni if we assume that both the sputtered Cu and Ni films are single crystals with different lattice constants. However, as the actual density of each sputtered film is not clear, we use the nominal thickness throughout this paper.
For the growth of BLG, the substrate was set in a tubular reactor for the ambient pressure CVD using CH4, H2, and Ar gas. The growth process consists of three steps; (1) H2 annealing, (2) CH4 supply, and (3) cooling steps. Step 1 is annealing at both 500 and 1000 °C in a diluted H2 flow, which improves crystallinity and surface flatness of metal catalyst.(41) As we will see later, this process also induces the Cu–Ni alloy formation. Step 2 is the carbon supply with 0.1% CH4 feedstock, and effects of the growth temperature and time were studied. Step 3 is optimized by changing the cooling rate as well as by pausing the cooling at 850 and 750 °C for a certain period of time to enhance the segregation of the second graphene layer. The optimized growth condition is presented in the Supporting Information (Figure S1).
After the CVD, as-grown graphene was transferred by a standard poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA)-assisted transfer method using an etching solution (aqueous solution of iron chloride (FeCl3) or ammonium persulfate ((NH4)2S2O8)) to dissolve the catalyst film.(40) After etching the metal film, PMMA/graphene stack was transferred onto a SiO2(300 nm)/Si substrate. Then the PMMA was removed by dipping in hot acetone. Finally, the sample was thoroughly washed with a dilute HCl (10%) solution and ultrapure water.
The catalyst metal films were characterized by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, Kratos AXIS-165), scanning electron microscope (SEM, HITACHI S-4800) equipped with an energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscope (EDS, Bruker QUANTAX FlatQUAD), and X-ray diffraction (XRD, RIGAKU RINT-III). Crystal orientations of as-grown graphene films were characterized by LEEM (Elmitec LEEM III). For the LEEM measurements, an as-grown graphene sample was vacuum annealed prior to the measurement to clean the graphene surface. Transferred graphene films were analyzed by optical microscopy (Nikon ECLIPSE ME600) and by Raman spectroscopy (Tokyo Instruments, Nanofinder30) using 532 nm excitation. The spatial distribution of the number of graphene layers was determined from the contrast of optical microscope images; the intensity of the green component was used to estimate the layer number.(42) The optical transmittance was measured by UV–vis spectrometer (JASCO V-570) for the graphene sheet transferred on a quartz substrate.
The relative stabilities of a graphene sheet on Cu(111) and Cu–Ni(111) films were studied by the DFT with the generalized gradient approximation (GGA)(43) by combining with a van der Waals correction, a plane-wave basis set (25 Ry), and ultrasoft pseudo potentials.(44) Graphene sheet, modeled by a planar π-conjugated molecule (C54H18), is adsorbed on metal surfaces simulated by four atom-thick metal slabs with various molecular orientations while fixing graphene–metal spacing to 0.35 nm under the open boundary condition normal to the surfaces.(45)

Results and Discussion

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

CVD Growth of BLG on Cu–Ni Films

First, we examined the effect of the sputtering order of the Cu and Ni films on the sapphire c-plane (α-Al2O3(0001)) substrate. Here we used sapphire to prepare epitaxial metal films, as reported previously for Cu(111)/sapphire.(39, 40) Since sapphire is widely used as a substrate for GaN-based light emitting diodes,(46) large sapphire wafers have become available with relatively low cost. Thus, sapphire can become an ideal substrate for high-quality graphene growth for advanced electronic applications. While fixing the nominal Ni ratio at 20%, we prepared two types of catalysts by changing the sputtering order, Cu400/Ni100/sapphire and Ni100/Cu400/sapphire (the subscripts indicate the thickness in nm of the metal films; for example, Cu400 indicates 400 nm-thick Cu). We found that the deposition of Ni followed by Cu (Cu400/Ni100/sapphire) produces a much smoother surface after the graphene growth than the opposite order (Ni100/Cu400/sapphire). The result is shown in Supporting Information, Figure S2. As we will discuss later, at the high processing temperature during the CVD, these two metals diffuse into each other and form a Cu–Ni alloy film. In the case of Ni100/Cu400/sapphire, most of the surface Ni atoms diffuse into the bulk of the Cu film by replacing Cu atoms, thus producing a very rough surface. Roughness of the catalyst is known to negatively affect the quality of the synthesized graphene.(41, 47) Therefore, we have intensively studied Cu/Ni/sapphire substrates for the catalytic synthesis of BLG. The growth process of BLG on the Cu/Ni/sapphire substrate is schematically illustrated in Figure 1, panel a.

Figure 1

Figure 1. (a) Schematics of the CVD growth of uniform bilayer graphene over a Cu–Ni alloy film deposited on a sapphire c-plane substrate. (b–d) Optical microscope images of graphene transferred on SiO2/Si substrates grown under different CVD conditions. (b) Temperature dependence for Cu-80%/Ni-20% catalyst. (c) Effect of slow cooling process instead of the rapid cooling used in panel b. (d) Optimization of the Ni concentration for the condition optimized in panels b and c. (e) Optical transmission spectra of BLG (red curve, Ni-22%/Cu-78%) and MLG (blue curve, pure Cu) transferred on quartz substrates. Inset shows the photograph of the samples on a SiO2/Si substrate.

Figure 1, panels b–d summarize the results of our systematic investigation of the growth conditions. The distribution of the number of graphene layers determined from the optical images is shown as a pie graph for each condition. We first studied the effect of the growth temperature (Figure 1b). CVD temperatures of 1000 °C resulted in BLG coverage reaching 70%. However, the BLG grains are relatively small, and most of them contain areas of tri- or multilayer graphene, which make it difficult to fully cover the catalyst surface only with BLG. We found that increasing the growth temperature to 1075 °C strongly suppresses the formation of tri- or multilayer graphene, although the obtained BLG coverage is lower (25%). Generally, a high CVD temperature increases the carbon solubility in metal films and also enhances the catalytic dissociation of the CH4 feedstock, both of which are expected to increase the total amount of segregated carbon atoms, leading to multilayer graphene. However, as can be seen in Figure 1, panel b, the total area of bi- and multilayer graphene grown at the high temperature (1075 °C) is smaller than that grown at the lower temperature (1000 °C). We think that this can be ascribed to the improved crystallinity of the Cu–Ni alloy catalyst produced at high temperature. We have previously reported that the graphene segregation from a Co film is strongly affected by the crystallinity of the Co metal.(41) A highly crystalline Co film gives much more uniform monolayer graphene than a polycrystalline Co film. Therefore, we speculate that the high CVD temperature enhances the crystallinity of the Cu–Ni thin film, giving a more uniform layer distribution.(48)
Since the graphene growth on high carbon solubility metals like Ni is driven by a segregation process,(49) the cooling profile strongly influences the distribution of the number of graphene layers and film uniformity. In particular, we found that changing the cooling rate from the standard rapid quenching (i.e., immediately taking out the sample from the hot area) to a slow cooling (5 °C/min) dramatically increases the total BLG area up to 80% (see Figure 1c, left). The uniform segregation is consistent with previous report(49) showing that relatively uniform graphene films can be obtained on Ni foil when the cooling rate is decreased. Previous in situ LEEM observations suggest that the segregation of the second layer takes place at around 850 °C.(50) Thus, we examined the effect of keeping the sample at a constant temperature of 850 °C for 1 h during cooling down the sample. Introducing this additional step in the cooling process further improved the BLG uniformity, which resulted in a BLG coverage of 90% (Figure 1c, right).
Finally, the Ni concentration was tuned to obtain the highest BLG coverage, as shown in Figure 1, panel d. While increasing the nominal Ni concentration to 25% gave a larger portion of tri- and multilayer graphene flakes, a Ni concentration of 22% resulted in the growth of uniform BLG with a 93% coverage. This indicates that a precise control of the Ni concentration is quite important for producing high BLG coverage. In the case of commercially available Cu–Ni alloy foils, only predefined Ni concentrations are available. However, our sputtering method for producing Cu/Ni films offers a higher controllability, as the film thicknesses of the Cu and Ni films can be changed independently. This, together with the higher crystallinity arising from the use of the sapphire substrate, allows us to obtain improved results to those obtained using conventional Cu–Ni alloy foils. From our experimental results, we found that the cooling profile and the Ni concentration are the most influential parameters for increasing the BLG coverage. It should be also noted that for our growth conditions, the catalyst surface is always fully covered by a continuous monolayer graphene layer (see Figure 1b,d), suggesting different growth modes for the first and the second layers.
The uniform growth of BLG was further confirmed by optical transmittance measurements after transfer on a quartz substrate, as shown in Figure 1, panel e. Our BLG sheet showed a transmittance of 95.9 ± 0.6% for 550 nm wavelength, while for a MLG sheet grown on Cu(111)/sapphire, the transmittance increases to 97.9 ± 0.6%. These values are consistent with the theoretical absorption values of 2.3% and 4.6% for MLG and BLG, respectively.(51) Inset of Figure 1, panel e shows a photograph of a MLG and a BLG sheet transferred on a same SiO2(300 nm)/Si substrate. The difference in optical contrast can be clearly appreciated from this photograph. The reproducibility of our method was confirmed by different CVD runs (see Figure S3 of the Supporting Information) and different sputter batches. Therefore, our method offers a versatile and reliable way to synthesize uniform BLG in large scale.

Characterization of Cu–Ni Alloy Catalysts

The inset of Figure 2, panel a shows the photograph of an as-sputtered Cu/Ni/sapphire (22%-Ni) and after the graphene growth. The as-sputter film shows the characteristic color of metallic Cu, as the Cu film is located over the Ni film. After the CVD, the film presents gray-colored surface, indicating the Ni diffusion into the upper Cu film. This observation was supported by the XPS depth-profile measurements (see Figure 2a,b). Surfaces of the films were etched by an Ar-ion beam, and XPS spectra were collected at different depths to obtain the profiles. The etching rate was calibrated by another experiment using a thin bare Cu film. In the as-sputtered film (Figure 2a), the substrate was mostly composed of Cu down to the studied depths (∼180 nm), which were below the Cu film thickness (∼390 nm). Some trace amounts of C atoms are present on the surface, which may come from impurities (such as adsorbed CO2 and organic molecules) due to the exposure after the sputtering. The Ni concentration significantly increased after the graphene growth with the relative concentration of Cu and Ni becoming almost constant in the measured depth (see Figure 2b). A similar behavior was observed in the elemental mappings for the cross-sections of the substrate measured by EDS (Figure 2c). After the CVD, EDS mapping showed a uniform distribution for both Cu and Ni throughout the whole film depth. These results clearly indicate the interdiffusion of Ni atom to the Cu layer (and vice versa), which resulted in the formation of Cu–Ni metal alloy.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Depth profiles of elements measured by XPS for the (a) as-sputtered Cu/Ni film and (b) that after the CVD for BLG growth. Blue, red, and black plots show Cu, Ni, and C, respectively. Inset of panel a is a photograph of the samples. The surface color of the as-sputtered film (left) changed to silver after the CVD (right), reflecting the formation of Cu–Ni alloy. (c) Cross-sectional EDS mapping images for Cu and Ni. (d) XRD profiles of the as-sputtered film and that after the BLG-CVD.

Because the diffusion is a thermally activated process, the diffusion coefficient, D, of Ni (or Cu) atoms in a Cu (Ni) film can be expressed by the following equation:(52)(1)For the “Ni in Cu”, D0 and Q are 2.7 cm2/s and 236 kJ/mol, respectively.(52) For “Cu in Ni”, D0 and Q are 5.7 cm2/s and 258 kJ/mol, respectively. From these values, the diffusion coefficients can be determined for the CVD temperature (1075 °C); the diffusion of Ni in the Cu matrix is 1.9 × 10–9 cm2/s, while Cu diffusion in Ni is 5.7 × 10–10 cm2/s. Therefore, the diffusion coefficient of Ni in Cu matrix is about three-times higher than that of Cu in Ni matrix. This can be another reason why the Ni/Cu/sapphire showed a rougher surface after the CVD (see Figure S2).
One interesting point of Figure 2, panel b is that a small amount of C atoms with a concentration of 1–2% was observed in the bulk of the Cu–Ni alloy film, clearly contrasting with the behavior seen before the CVD (Figure 2a). This shows that a significant amount of C is being dissolved into the Cu–Ni metal alloy during the CVD process. As discussed later, we speculate that such dissolved C atoms in the bulk of the alloy contribute to the growth of large-area BLG.
We also measured the XRD patterns for the metal films, as shown in Figure 2, panel d. The as-sputtered Cu/Ni/sapphire substrate showed diffraction peaks at 43.4° and 44.6°, which are assigned to the face-centered cubic (fcc) (111) diffractions from Cu(111) and Ni(111) planes, respectively. After the CVD, only one sharp peak lying between these two diffraction peaks was observed at 43.7°. According to the previous XPS and EDS observations, this peak can be assigned to the diffraction from the Cu–Ni(111) alloy. Therefore, a Cu–Ni alloy having fcc(111) plane is formed during the CVD process, allowing for the presence of a certain amount of C atoms in the alloy bulk for the effective BLG growth. The relative concentration of Ni is calculated to be 25% from Vegard’s law, which is a similar value to that obtained from the XPS depth profile. We speculate that the slight discrepancy from the initial value is due to evaporation of some surface Cu atoms during the CVD, as the Cu melting temperature (1084 °C) is close to the CVD temperature (1075 °C), while that of Ni (1455 °C) is much higher.

Stacking Order in CVD-Grown BLG

Figure 3, panels a and b show the optical micrograph and the corresponding Raman mapping image of the intensity ratio of the 2D and G bands (I2D/IG) measured for a transferred BLG sheet. It is acknowledged that Raman spectroscopy can be used to determine the stacking type in BLG, mainly from the I2D/IG ratio.(20, 53) In brief, this ratio is below 1 for AB stacking, while for twisted BLG, the ratio is usually over 1 (in most cases the ratio is ∼2).(20) From Figure 3, panel b, it is seen that most of the area corresponds to AB stacking, represented by blue color (points 1 and 2 in the mapping image). Some isolated areas show a more intense 2D band compared to the G band (point 3 in the mapping). As MLG also shows a more intense 2D band than G band, its results are difficult to differentiate between MLG and twisted BLG areas only from Raman mapping. However, comparison with the optical micrograph shows no difference in the contrast between these areas. This indicates that the thickness of the graphene is the same and they both correspond to BLG, thus suggesting the presence of islands of twisted BLG in addition to the AB-stacked BLG that covers most of the Cu–Ni surface. Raman spectra measured at the points marked in Figure 3, panel b are shown in Figure 3, panel c. The intensity of defect-related D band was very low in our BLG sheet regardless of the stacking type, signifying the growth of high-quality BLG with low defects.

Figure 3

Figure 3. (a) Optical micrograph of transferred BLG and (b) the corresponding Raman mapping images of the relative intensity of 2D band to G band (I2D/IG). (c) Raman spectra marked in panel b. Inset shows the 2D band shape of the spectrum 2, which is fitted with four Lorentzian curves (the gray broken lines). The fitted curve is shown by the red broken line. Distribution of (d) I2D/IG ratio and (e) fwhm2D measured for 300 different spots of a transferred graphene sheet. Red and gray data show AB stacked and twist BLG grains, respectively.

The stacking type of BLG also influences the shape and width of Raman 2D band (fwhm2D).(20) We observed that the AB-stacked BLG showed a broad 2D band with a fwhm of 44–63 cm–1, while for twisted BLG, the fwhm was 38–46 cm–1. As shown in the inset of Figure 3, panel c, the 2D band of the AB-stacked area can be deconvoluted into four Lorentzian components, as in the case of exfoliated BLG flakes.(53) This also proves the formation of AB-stacked BLG. The statistical distributions of I2D/IG and fwhm2D are plotted in Figure 3, panels d and e. For fair evaluation, we collected Raman spectra at 300 different spots from a 1.5 mm × 1.5 mm area of a transferred graphene sheet. From these distributions, we conclude that 70–80% of the BLG has AB stacking, while the remaining has twisted stacking.
To further determine the orientation of our BLG, we measured LEEM for the as-grown sample on the Cu–Ni(111) alloy film. This technique allows us to precisely determine rotation angles between the graphene layers by measuring electron diffraction patterns, which cannot be obtained by Raman spectroscopy. In addition, LEEM measurement provides information about the graphene orientation with respect to the underlying Cu–Ni(111) lattice. Figure 4 shows examples of electron diffraction patterns from mono- and bilayer graphene grown on the Cu–Ni(111) alloy. It should be noted that this is not a representative area of the sample. Instead, an area including different structures (monolayer, AB and twisted bilayer graphene) has been selected to demonstrate the effectiveness of the LEEM measurement. At the brightest area (position 1) in Figure 4, panel a, where monolayer graphene is present (the number of layer was confirmed by independent measurement of the electron reflection spectrum (see Figure 5d)), we observed six strong diffraction spots originating in monolayer graphene (Figure 4b). In addition, weak diffraction spots are also seen at the position 1, which consist of three brighter and three darker spots. These spots with different intensities originate in Cu–Ni(111) surface, reflecting the three-fold symmetry of the fcc(111) plane. The relatively weaker diffraction from the Cu–Ni compared with graphene can be explained by a screening effect of incident electrons by the graphene layer before reaching the Cu–Ni surface as well as the screening of scattered electrons from the Cu–Ni surface by the graphene layer. The above results indicate that the as-grown MLG is rotated 30° from the Cu–Ni lattice.

Figure 4

Figure 4. (a) BF-LEEM image and (b–d) corresponding diffraction patterns. The diffraction was measured at the points 1, 2, and 3, marked in panel a. In , panels b−d, “1L G” denotes the diffraction from monolayer graphene, while “upper G” and “lower G” are those from upper and lower graphene sheets of bilayer graphene, respectively.

Figure 5

Figure 5. LEEM analysis of the CVD-grown BLG sheet on a Cu−Ni thin film. (a–c) BF LEEM images. (a) Uniform BLG. (b) Different area with MLG, which appears dark. (c) Magnified image of white circle in panel b. (d) Reflection spectra of spots 1, 2, 3 shown in panel c. (e–h) Top rows: LEEM images measured with different diffraction angle conditions. The colored areas indicate the upper/lower layers with rotation angles with respect to the original Cu(111) diffraction. Areas marked with white lines indicate the grains, which have Bernal (AB) stacking. Middle rows: Selected area diffraction taken from the points marked in the top rows. Bottom images of panels e–h show orientations of upper and lower graphene layers determined for the positions A–D from the corresponding diffraction patterns. All scale bars are 5 μm.

At the position 2 (Figure 4c), only one set of six diffraction spots was observed, with identical orientation to that of MLG (Figure 4b). Here, no diffraction spots from the Cu–Ni lattice are present due to an enhanced electron screening effect by BLG. Therefore, at the position 2, BLG has AB stacking with both graphene layers rotated from the Cu–Ni lattice by 30°. At the position 3, a new set of diffraction spots rotated by 30° is observed, presumably originating in the bottom graphene layer. The set of six diffraction spots from the lower layer has an identical intensity proving the six-fold symmetry of graphene. These spots are weaker due to the presence of the upper layer. Thus, in this area, the upper layer is rotated from the Cu–Ni lattice by 30°, while the lower layer matches the orientation of the Cu–Ni lattice (0°). This indicates that the position 3 corresponds to a 30°-twisted BLG region. Interestingly, the orientation of the upper layer (areas 2 and 3) matches that of the MLG region (area 1). Thus, it is highly likely that the upper graphene layer uniformly covers the whole view area of Figure 4, panel a. This strongly suggests that the second layer (i.e., the segregated layer) is grown below the first layer.
Figure 5, panel a shows bright-field (BF) LEEM image of more representative area of our BLG sample. Uniform contrast was observed in the whole view area, indicating the presence of large and uniform BLG. For the detailed investigation of stacking order, we have chosen a specific area (Figure 5b) that contains both bilayer and monolayer graphene. The dark area seen in Figure 5, panel b corresponds to monolayer, while the blight area is assigned to bilayer graphene. The electron reflectivity measured at positions 1, 2, and 3 are plotted in Figure 5, panel d. The profiles confirm that positions 2 and 3 correspond to bilayer, while spot 1 is monolayer graphene.(54)Figure 5, panel c presents the BF-LEEM image of the circled area in Figure 5, panel b measured at 40 eV, where the contrast reflects the information on the stacking order of the BLG.
Figure 5, panels e–h and Figure S4 present detailed analyses of graphene grain orientation for the area shown in Figure 5, panel c. From the diffraction patterns, we could categorize four different regions, AB (0°/0°, Figure 5e), twist (30°/0°, Figure 5f), AB (30°/30°, Figure 5g), and twist (0°/30°, Figure 5h). Each of these pairs of angles shows the relative orientation with respect to the underlying Cu–Ni(111) lattice of the upper (first angle) and the lower (second angle) layers, where the stacking order was determined from the relative intensities of the electron diffraction spots, as was explained in Figure 4. The atomic structures of these four pairs of graphene orientations are indicated in the bottom panels of Figure 5, panels e–h. The monolayer area (position 1 in Figure 5c) has 30°-rotation with respect to the Cu–Ni lattice, as determined from Figure 5, panel g. This monolayer is expected to extend to the region B of Figure 5, panel f. The diffraction spot marked with the dark green circle in Figure 5, panel f is coming from the lower layer considering the weak diffraction spot. Therefore, we confirmed that layer which is a part of position 1 corresponds to the upper layer.
The present LEEM results indicate that there is certain selectivity for 0°-orientation in addition to 30°-orientation for both the upper and lower graphene layers. We speculate that the addition of Ni atoms into the Cu(111) lattice lowers the original three-fold symmetry, as most likely the Ni atoms randomly distribute on the surface and the bulk of the Cu. Therefore, the lowering surface symmetry by the Ni atoms may be one of possible reasons. In addition, our recent work suggests that high CVD temperatures above 1040 °C induce thermal fluctuations that may result in the formation of rotated grains.(55) It is worthwhile to note that hexagonal BLG grains observed on Cu foil were reported to frequently have a second layer whose angle is rotated by 30° from the first layer.(25) Trilayer graphene grown on Cu foil at 1050 °C was also reported to have major stacking with a combination of 0° and 30° orientations at each layer.(56) As shown in the Supporting Information (Figure S5), we observed rotated hexagonal BLG grains on an epitaxial Cu(111) film. Therefore, the 30°-rotation in BLG is a commonly observed phenomenon even on Cu catalyst (without Ni).
To further understand plausible orientations of graphene on a Cu–Ni alloy catalyst, we performed DFT calculations using a planar π-conjugated molecule, C54H18, adsorbed on Cu(111) and Cu–Ni(111) surfaces as a model system of as-grown graphene. Here, we take 7 × 7 lateral periodicity, and Cu–Ni alloy was simulated by randomly replacing 20% of the Cu atoms by Ni. Energy profiles are plotted in Figure 6, panels a and b for the molecule adsorbed on the Cu(111) and Cu–Ni(111), respectively. In both cases, the absolute biding energy is the highest at 0°, signifying that the orientation registered by the fcc(111) is the most stable configuration. The absolute binding energy was found to be higher for the Cu–Ni alloy than Cu. This suggests a stronger interaction between C–Ni than that of C–Cu, being consistent with the previous calculation showing a higher binding energy for graphene–Ni interface than graphene–Cu.(57) Calculations also show that there is a metastable structure corresponding to 30°-rotated orientation for both Cu and Cu–Ni catalysts (Figure 6a,b). Interestingly, the energy difference between the most stable and metastable configurations of C54H18/Cu–Ni system (17 meV) is much smaller than that of C54H18/Cu system (34 meV). This result suggests that the Cu–Ni alloy gives metastable 30°-rotated orientation more frequently than that of pure Cu catalyst. Further fine-tuning of the growth condition may be necessary for the experimental realization of perfectly AB-stacked, large-area BLG.

Figure 6

Figure 6. Binding energies of planar π-conjugated molecules adsorbed on (a) Cu and (b) Cu–Ni(111) alloy surfaces. The binding energies were determined by DFT calculations for relative orientations. Right panels show the atomic images of 0° and 30° orientation. Yellow and green atoms indicate Cu and Ni atoms, respectively.

Growth Mechanism of Uniform BLG on Cu–Ni Alloy Film

On the basis of the experimental results presented, we propose a growth mechanism of BLG over the Cu–Ni(111) alloy catalyst in Figure 7. As confirmed by the XPS and the EDS (Figure 2), the Cu/Ni stacked film forms a Cu–Ni alloy during the high-temperature CVD process (Figure 7a,b). At high temperatures (1000–1075 °C), the CH4 feedstock is decomposed into carbon intermediate species, CHx (x = 0–3), due to reaction catalyzed by the Cu–Ni alloy. Some of the C atoms diffuse into the bulk of the alloy (Figure 7c), as was observed by the depth-profile of XPS (see Figure 2b). It should be noted that regardless of the growth conditions employed, after the CVD, the surface of the catalyst is always fully covered with a monolayer graphene layer, as seen in Figure 1, panels b–d. Therefore, it is highly likely that the first layer grows via surface reaction, as reported when using a pure Cu metal as a catalyst.(24) Since more than 70% of the surface atoms of the Cu–Ni alloy are Cu atoms, it is reasonable that the monolayer is formed on the alloy surface (Figure 7c,d). Thus, we consider that the growth of the first layer occurs during the supplying of the CH4 gas.

Figure 7

Figure 7. Schematic of the growth mechanism of BLG on Cu–Ni metal alloy catalyst. (a) As-sputtered, Cu/Ni stacked film. (b) Cu–Ni alloy is formed during heating the substrate for graphene growth. (c) MLG starts to grow on the alloy surface, while some carbon atoms diffuse into the bulk of the alloy. (d) MLG covers the whole alloy surface with a sufficient amount of dissolved C atoms. (e) During cooling process, the second layer is segregated to form BLG. Yellow, green, black, and red show Cu, Ni, C, and H atoms, respectively.

Most probably, the dissolution of carbon atoms into the Cu–Ni bulk takes place simultaneously with the surface growth of the monolayer graphene. Once the alloy surface is covered with MLG, the catalytic decomposition of the CH4 ceases. Accordingly, we observed that extending the CH4 reaction time does not significantly influence the BLG coverage. During the cooling process, the second layer is formed via carbon segregation (Figure 7e). Thus, this second layer should be formed below the first layer, which was confirmed by our LEEM measurement, as discussed in Figures 4 and 5. Here, the Ni concentration determines the total amount of dissolved C atoms, and the cooling profile strongly affects the amount of segregated C atoms from the alloy bulk. This is in accordance with our observations that both Ni concentration and cooling profile strongly influence the BLG coverage (see Figure 1). Previous reports explain the BLG growth in Cu–Ni catalyst by a pure segregation process.(34, 36) As far as we know, this is the first report that proposes different growth modes for the first and second layers, stressing the importance of both segregation and surface processes for the synthesis of uniform BLG.

Conclusions

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

The uniform growth of BLG with a coverage of 93% of the catalyst surface is demonstrated by using epitaxial Cu–Ni(111) alloy film deposited on c-plane sapphire. Our systematic study indicated that the Ni concentration and the cooling profile during CVD strongly influence the BLG coverage. We proposed a new growth mechanism, which explains the different growth modes for the upper and the lower layers. In this, the upper graphene layer grows during the exposure to CH4 at high temperature (surface growth), while the lower graphene layer is formed during the cooling process (segregation growth). Our Raman spectroscopy measurements indicated that about 70–80% of the BLG is AB-stacked. Furthermore, the LEEM measurements revealed that the AB-stacked BLG has two main orientations, 0°/0° and 30°/30°, with respect to the underlying Cu–Ni(111) lattice. The DFT calculations showed that the 0°-oriented is the most stable configuration, while 30°-oriented configuration is a metastable state. Also, the energy difference between these two configurations is suggested to be smaller for the Cu–Ni alloy than pure Cu catalyst. Our work provides a reliable way to synthesize BLG in large-scale, which can be applied to graphene-based high-performance semiconductor devices.

Supporting Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b01137.

  • Experimental procedure, effect of the Cu–Ni stacking order, additional optical microscope and LEEM images, and AB-stacked and twist bilayer graphene grains grown on Cu(111) (PDF)

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

  • Corresponding Author
    • Hiroki Ago - PRESTO, Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST), Saitama 332-0012, Japan Email: [email protected]
  • Authors
    • Yuichiro Takesaki - †Interdisciplinary Graduate School of Engineering Sciences, ‡Art, Science, and Technology Center for Cooperative Research (KASTEC), and §Research and Education Center of Carbon Resources, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 816-8580, JapanKwansei Gakuin University, Hyogo 669-1337, JapanNTT Basic Research Laboratories, NTT Corporation, Kanagawa 243-0198, JapanGraduate School of Pure and Applied Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba 305-8577, JapanPRESTO, Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST), Saitama 332-0012, Japan
    • Kenji Kawahara - †Interdisciplinary Graduate School of Engineering Sciences, ‡Art, Science, and Technology Center for Cooperative Research (KASTEC), and §Research and Education Center of Carbon Resources, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 816-8580, JapanKwansei Gakuin University, Hyogo 669-1337, JapanNTT Basic Research Laboratories, NTT Corporation, Kanagawa 243-0198, JapanGraduate School of Pure and Applied Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba 305-8577, JapanPRESTO, Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST), Saitama 332-0012, Japan
    • Hiroki Hibino - Kwansei Gakuin University, Hyogo 669-1337, JapanNTT Basic Research Laboratories, NTT Corporation, Kanagawa 243-0198, Japan
    • Susumu Okada - Graduate School of Pure and Applied Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba 305-8577, Japan
    • Masaharu Tsuji - †Interdisciplinary Graduate School of Engineering Sciences, ‡Art, Science, and Technology Center for Cooperative Research (KASTEC), and §Research and Education Center of Carbon Resources, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 816-8580, JapanKwansei Gakuin University, Hyogo 669-1337, JapanNTT Basic Research Laboratories, NTT Corporation, Kanagawa 243-0198, JapanGraduate School of Pure and Applied Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba 305-8577, JapanPRESTO, Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST), Saitama 332-0012, Japan
  • Notes

    The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgment

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

This work is supported by PRESTO-JST and KAKENHI (Grant Nos. 15H03530, 15K13304, and 16H00917 from JSPS). We thank Dr. Miura of the Center of Advanced Instrumental Analysis of Kyushu University for the XPS measurements. We acknowledge Mr. Tanoue and Mr. Kinoshita for the experimental help of bilayer graphene syntheses.

References

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

This article references 57 other publications.

  1. 1
    Zurutuza, A.; Marinelli, C. Challenges and Opportunities in Graphene Commercialization Nat. Nanotechnol. 2014, 9, 730 734 DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2014.225
  2. 2
    Sato, S. Graphene for Nanoelectronics Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2015, 54, 040102 DOI: 10.7567/JJAP.54.040102
  3. 3
    Ma, L.; Wang, J.; Ding, F. Recent Progress and Challenges in Graphene Nanoribbon Synthesis ChemPhysChem 2013, 14, 47 54 DOI: 10.1002/cphc.201200253
  4. 4
    Guinea, F.; Katsnelson, M. I.; Geim, A. K. Energy Gaps and a Zero-Field Quantum Hall Effect in Graphene by Strain Engineering Nat. Phys. 2010, 6, 30 33 DOI: 10.1038/nphys1420
  5. 5
    Loh, K. P.; Bao, Q.; Ang, P. K.; Yang, J. The Chemistry of Graphene J. Mater. Chem. 2010, 20, 2277 2289 DOI: 10.1039/b920539j
  6. 6
    Oostinga, J. B.; Heersche, H. B.; Liu, X.; Morpurgo, A. F.; Vandersypen, L. M. K. Gate-Induced Insulating State in Bilayer Graphene Devices Nat. Mater. 2008, 7, 151 157 DOI: 10.1038/nmat2082
  7. 7
    Zhang, Y.; Tang, T.-T.; Girit, C.; Hao, Z.; Martin, M. C.; Zettl, A.; Crommie, M. F.; Shen, Y. R.; Wang, F. Direct Observation of a Widely Tunable Bandgap in Bilayer Graphene Nature 2009, 459, 820 823 DOI: 10.1038/nature08105
  8. 8
    Mak, K. F.; Lui, C. H.; Shan, J.; Heinz, T. F. Observation of an Electric-Field-Induced Band Gap in Bilayer Graphene by Infrared Spectroscopy Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009, 102, 256405 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.256405
  9. 9
    Xia, F.; Farmer, D. B.; Lin, Y.-M.; Avouris, P. Graphene Field-Effect Transistors with High On/Off Current Ratio and Large Transport Band Gap at Room Temperature Nano Lett. 2010, 10, 715 718 DOI: 10.1021/nl9039636
  10. 10
    Li, S.-L.; Miyazaki, H.; Hiura, H.; Liu, C.; Tsukagoshi, K. Enhanced Logic Performance with Semiconducting Bilayer Graphene Channels ACS Nano 2011, 5, 500 506 DOI: 10.1021/nn102346b
  11. 11
    Yamashiro, Y.; Ohno, Y.; Maehashi, K.; Inoue, K.; Matsumoto, K. Electric-Field-Induced Band Gap of Bilayer Graphene in Ionic Liquid J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 2012, 30, 03D111 DOI: 10.1116/1.3699011
  12. 12
    Chu, T.; Chen, Z. Achieving Large Transport Bandgaps in Bilayer Graphene Nano Res. 2015, 8, 3228 3236 DOI: 10.1007/s12274-015-0823-x
  13. 13
    Kanayama, K.; Nagashio, K. Gap State Analysis in Electric-Field-Induced Band Gap for Bilayer Graphene Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 15789 DOI: 10.1038/srep15789
  14. 14
    Koehler, F. M.; Jacobsen, A.; Ensslin, K.; Stampfer, C.; Stark, W. J. Selective Chemical Modification of Graphene Surfaces: Distinction Between Single- and Bilayer Graphene Small 2010, 6, 1125 1130 DOI: 10.1002/smll.200902370
  15. 15
    Wang, Q. H.; Shih, C.-J.; Paulus, G. L. C.; Strano, M. S. Evolution of Physical and Electronic Structures of Bilayer Graphene upon Chemical Functionalization J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 18866 18875 DOI: 10.1021/ja4083914
  16. 16
    Bissett, M. A.; Takesaki, Y.; Tsuji, M.; Ago, H. Increased Chemical Reactivity Achieved by Asymmetrical ‘Janus’ Functionalisation of Graphene RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 52215 52219 DOI: 10.1039/C4RA09724F
  17. 17
    Nakada, K.; Fujita, M.; Dresselhaus, G.; Dresselhaus, M. S. Edge State in Graphene Ribbons: Nanometer Size Effect and Edge Shape Dependence Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 1996, 54, 17954 17961 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.17954
  18. 18
    Lee, S.; Lee, K.; Zhong, Z. Wafer Scale Homogeneous Bilayer Graphene Films by Chemical Vapor Deposition Nano Lett. 2010, 10, 4702 4707 DOI: 10.1021/nl1029978
  19. 19
    Yan, K.; Peng, H.; Zhou, Y.; Li, H.; Liu, Z. Formation of Bilayer Bernal Graphene: Layer-by-Layer Epitaxy via Chemical Vapor Deposition Nano Lett. 2011, 11, 1106 1110 DOI: 10.1021/nl104000b
  20. 20
    Liu, L.; Zhou, H.; Cheng, R.; Yu, W. J.; Liu, Y.; Chen, Y.; Shaw, J.; Zhong, X.; Huang, Y.; Duan, X. High-Yield Chemical Vapor Deposition Growth of High-Quality Large-Area AB-Stacked Bilayer Graphene ACS Nano 2012, 6, 8241 8249 DOI: 10.1021/nn302918x
  21. 21
    Sun, Z.; Raji, A.-R. O.; Zhu, Y.; Xiang, C.; Yan, Z.; Kittrell, C.; Samuel, E. L. G.; Tour, J. M. Large-Area Bernal-Stacked Bi-, Tri-, and Tetralayer Graphene ACS Nano 2012, 6, 9790 9796 DOI: 10.1021/nn303328e
  22. 22
    Wassei, J. K.; Mecklenburg, M.; Torres, J. A.; Fowler, J. D.; Regan, B. C.; Kaner, R. B.; Weiller, B. H. Chemical Vapor Deposition of Graphene on Copper from Methane, Ethane and Propane: Evidence for Bilayer Selectivity Small 2012, 8, 1415 1422 DOI: 10.1002/smll.201102276
  23. 23
    Zhao, P.; Kim, S.; Chen, X.; Einarsson, E.; Wang, M.; Song, Y.; Wang, H.; Chiashi, S.; Xiang, R.; Maruyama, S. Equilibrium Chemical Vapor Deposition Growth of Bernal-Stacked Bilayer Graphene ACS Nano 2014, 8, 11631 11638 DOI: 10.1021/nn5049188
  24. 24
    Li, X.; Cai, W.; An, J.; Kim, S.; Nah, J.; Yang, D.; Piner, R.; Velamakanni, A.; Jung, I.; Tutuc, E.; Banerjee, S. K.; Colombo, L.; Ruoff, R. S. Large-Area Synthesis of High-Quality and Uniform Graphene Films on Copper Foils Science 2009, 324, 1312 1314 DOI: 10.1126/science.1171245
  25. 25
    Vlassiouk, I.; Regmi, M.; Fulvio, P.; Dai, S.; Datskos, P.; Eres, G.; Smirnov, S. Role of Hydrogen in Chemical Vapor Deposition Growth of Large Single-Crystal Graphene ACS Nano 2011, 5, 6069 6076 DOI: 10.1021/nn201978y
  26. 26
    Wu, B.; Geng, D.; Guo, Y.; Huang, L.; Xue, Y.; Zheng, J.; Chen, J.; Yu, G.; Liu, Y.; Jiang, L.; Hu, W. Equiangular Hexagon-Shape-Controlled Synthesis of Graphene on Copper Surface Adv. Mater. 2011, 23, 3522 3525 DOI: 10.1002/adma.201101746
  27. 27
    Nie, S.; Wu, W.; Xing, S.; Yu, Q.; Bao, J.; Pei, S.-S.; McCarty, K. F. Growth from Below: Bilayer Graphene on Copper by Chemical Vapor Deposition New J. Phys. 2012, 14, 093028 DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/14/9/093028
  28. 28
    Kalbac, M.; Frank, O.; Kavan, L. The Control of Graphene Double-Layer Formation in Copper-Catalyzed Chemical Vapor Deposition Carbon 2012, 50, 3682 3687 DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2012.03.041
  29. 29
    Yan, Z.; Liu, Y.; Ju, L.; Peng, Z.; Lin, J.; Wang, G.; Zhou, H.; Xiang, C.; Samuel, E. L. G.; Kittrell, C.; Artyukhov, V. I.; Wang, F.; Yakobson, B. I.; Tour, J. M. Large Hexagonal Bi- and Trilayer Graphene Single Crystals with Varied Interlayer Rotations Angew. Chem. 2014, 126, 1591 1595 DOI: 10.1002/ange.201306317
  30. 30
    Yeh, C.-H.; Lin, Y.-C.; Nayak, P. K.; Lu, C.-C.; Liu, Z.; Suenaga, K.; Chiu, P.-W. Probing Interlayer Coupling in Twisted Single-Crystal Bilayer Graphene by Raman Spectroscopy J. Raman Spectrosc. 2014, 45, 912 917 DOI: 10.1002/jrs.4571
  31. 31
    Fang, W.; Hsu, A. L.; Caudillo, R.; Song, Y.; Birdwell, A. G.; Zakar, E.; Kalbac, M.; Dubey, M.; Palacios, T.; Dresselhaus, M. S.; Araujo, P. T.; Kong, J. Rapid Identification of Stacking Orientation in Isotopically Labeled Chemical-Vapor Grown Bilayer Graphene by Raman Spectroscopy Nano Lett. 2013, 13, 1541 1548 DOI: 10.1021/nl304706j
  32. 32
    Hao, Y.; Wang, L.; Liu, Y.; Chen, H.; Wang, X.; Tan, C.; Nie, S.; Suk, J. W.; Jiang, T.; Liang, T.; Xiao, J.; Ye, W.; Dean, C. R.; Yakobson, B. I.; McCarty, K. F.; Kim, P.; Hone, J.; Colombo, L.; Ruoff, R. S. Oxygen-Activated Growth and Bandgap Tunability of Large Single-Crystal Bilayer Graphene Nat. Nanotechnol. 2016, 11, 426 431 DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2015.322
  33. 33
    Liu, X.; Fu, L.; Liu, N.; Gao, T.; Zhang, Y.; Liao, L.; Liu, Z. Segregation Growth of Graphene on Cu−Ni Alloy for Precise Layer Control J. Phys. Chem. C 2011, 115, 11976 11982 DOI: 10.1021/jp202933u
  34. 34
    Wu, Y.; Chou, H.; Ji, H.; Wu, Q.; Chen, S.; Jiang, W.; Hao, Y.; Kang, J.; Ren, Y.; Piner, R. D.; Ruoff, R. S. Growth Mechanism and Controlled Synthesis of AB-Stacked Bilayer Graphene on Cu-Ni Alloy Foils ACS Nano 2012, 6, 7731 7738 DOI: 10.1021/nn301689m
  35. 35
    Liu, W.; Kraemer, S.; Sarkar, D.; Li, H.; Ajayan, P. M.; Banerjee, K. Controllable and Rapid Synthesis of High-Quality and Large-Area Bernal Stacked Bilayer Graphene Using Chemical Vapor Deposition Chem. Mater. 2014, 26, 907 915 DOI: 10.1021/cm4021854
  36. 36
    Lin, T.; Huang, F.; Wan, D.; Bi, H.; Xie, X.; Jiang, M. Self-Regulating Homogenous Growth of High-Quality Graphene on Co–Cu Composite Substrate for Layer Control Nanoscale 2013, 5, 5847 5853 DOI: 10.1039/c3nr33124e
  37. 37
    Lu, C.-C.; Lin, Y.-C.; Liu, Z.; Yeh, C.-H.; Suenaga, K.; Chiu, P.-W. Twisting Bilayer Graphene Superlattices ACS Nano 2013, 7, 2587 2594 DOI: 10.1021/nn3059828
  38. 38
    Havener, R. W.; Zhuang, H.; Brown, L.; Hennig, R. G.; Park, J. Angle-Resolved Raman Imaging of Interlayer Rotations and Interactions in Twisted Bilayer Graphene Nano Lett. 2012, 12, 3162 3267 DOI: 10.1021/nl301137k
  39. 39
    Hu, B.; Ago, H.; Ito, Y.; Kawahara, K.; Tsuji, M.; Magome, E.; Sumitani, K.; Mizuta, N.; Ikeda, K.; Mizuno, S. Epitaxial Growth of Large-Area Single-Layer Graphene over Cu(111)/Sapphire by Atmospheric Pressure CVD Carbon 2012, 50, 57 65 DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2011.08.002
  40. 40
    Ago, H.; Kawahara, K.; Ogawa, Y.; Tanoue, S.; Bissett, M. A.; Tsuji, M.; Sakaguchi, H.; Koch, R. J.; Fromm, F.; Seyller, T.; Komatsu, K.; Tsukagoshi, K. Epitaxial Growth and Electronic Properties of Large Hexagonal Graphene Domains on Cu(111) Thin Film Appl. Phys. Express 2013, 6, 075101 DOI: 10.7567/APEX.6.075101
  41. 41
    Ago, H.; Ito, Y.; Mizuta, N.; Yoshida, K.; Hu, B.; Orofeo, C. M.; Tsuji, M.; Ikeda, K.; Mizuno, S. Epitaxial Chemical Vapor Deposition Growth of Single-Layer Graphene over Cobalt Film Crystallized on Sapphire ACS Nano 2010, 4, 7407 7414 DOI: 10.1021/nn102519b
  42. 42
    Blake, P.; Hill, E. W.; Castro Neto, A. H.; Novoselov, K. S.; Jiang, D.; Yang, R.; Booth, T. J.; Geim, A. K. Making Graphene Visible Appl. Phys. Lett. 2007, 91, 063124 DOI: 10.1063/1.2768624
  43. 43
    Perdew, J. P.; Burke, K.; Ernzerhof, M. Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996, 77, 3865 3868 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865
  44. 44
    Hamada, I.; Otani, M. Comparative van der Waals Density-Functional Study of Graphene on Metal Surfaces Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2010, 82, 153412 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.82.153412
  45. 45
    Otani, M.; Sugino, O. First-Principles Calculations of Charged Surfaces and Interfaces: A Plane-Wave Nonrepeated Slab Approach Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2006, 73, 115407 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.73.115407
  46. 46
    Amano, H. Growth of GaN Layers on Sapphire by Low-Temperature-Deposited Buffer Layers and Realization of p-type GaN by Magnesium Doping and Electron Beam Irradiation Angew. Chem. 2015, 54, 7764 7769 DOI: 10.1002/anie.201501651
  47. 47
    Luo, Z.; Lu, Y.; Singer, D. W.; Berck, M. E.; Somers, L. A.; Goldsmith, B. R.; Johnson, A. T. C. Effect of Substrate Roughness and Feedstock Concentration on Growth of Wafer-Scale Graphene at Atmospheric Pressure Chem. Mater. 2011, 23, 1441 1447 DOI: 10.1021/cm1028854
  48. 48
    Zhang, Y.; Gomez, L.; Ishikawa, F. N.; Madaria, A.; Ryu, K.; Wang, C.; Badmaev, A.; Zhou, C. Comparison of Graphene Growth on Single-Crystalline and Polycrystalline Ni by Chemical Vapor Deposition J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2010, 1, 3101 3107 DOI: 10.1021/jz1011466
  49. 49
    Reina, A.; Thiele, S.; Jia, X.; Bhaviripudi, S.; Dresselhaus, M. S.; Schaefer, J. A.; Kong, J. Growth of Large-Area Single- and Bi-Layer Graphene by Controlled Carbon Precipitation on Polycrystalline Ni Surfaces Nano Res. 2009, 2, 509 516 DOI: 10.1007/s12274-009-9059-y
  50. 50
    Odahara, G.; Otani, S.; Oshima, C.; Suzuki, M.; Yasue, T.; Koshikawa, T. In-situ Observation of Graphene Growth on Ni(111) Surf. Sci. 2011, 605, 1095 1098 DOI: 10.1016/j.susc.2011.03.011
  51. 51
    Nair, R. R.; Blake, P.; Grigorenko, A. N.; Novoselov, K. S.; Booth, T. J.; Stauber, T.; Peres, N. M. R.; Geim, A. K. Fine Structure Constant Defines Visual Transparency of Graphene Science 2008, 320, 1308 DOI: 10.1126/science.1156965
  52. 52
    Butrymowicz, D. B.; Manning, J. R.; Read, M. E. Diffusion in Copper and Copper Alloyes. Part IV. Diffusion in Systems Involving Elements of Group VIII J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 1976, 5, 103 200 DOI: 10.1063/1.555528
  53. 53
    Ferrari, A. C.; Meyer, J. C.; Scardaci, V.; Casiraghi, C.; Lazzeri, M.; Mauri, F.; Piscanec, S.; Jiang, D.; Novoselov, K. S.; Roth, S.; Geim, A. K. Raman Spectrum of Graphene and Graphene Layers Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006, 97, 187401 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.187401
  54. 54
    Hibino, H.; Kageshima, H.; Maeda, F.; Nagase, M.; Kobayashi, Y.; Yamaguchi, H. Microscopic Thickness Determination of Thin Graphite Films Formed on SiC from Quantized Oscillation in Reflectivity of Low-Energy Electrons Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2008, 77, 075413 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.77.075413
  55. 55
    Ago, H.; Ohta, Y.; Hibino, H.; Yoshimura, D.; Takizawa, R.; Uchida, Y.; Tsuji, M.; Okajima, T.; Mitani, H.; Mizuno, S. Growth Dynamics of Single-Layer Graphene on Epitaxial Cu Surfaces Chem. Mater. 2015, 27, 5377 5385 DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b01871
  56. 56
    Zhao, H.; Lin, Y.-C.; Yeh, C.-H.; Tian, H.; Chen, Y.-C.; Xie, D.; Yang, Y.; Suenaga, K.; Ren, T.-L.; Chiu, P.-W. Growth and Raman Spectra of Single-Crystal Trilayer Graphene with Different Stacking Orientations ACS Nano 2014, 8, 10766 10773 DOI: 10.1021/nn5044959
  57. 57
    Vanin, M.; Mortensen, J. J.; Kelkkanen, A. K.; Garcia-Lastra, J. M.; Thygesen, K. S.; Jacobsen, K. W. Graphene on Metals: A van der Waals Density Functional Study Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2010, 81, 081408 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.081408

Cited By


This article is cited by 57 publications.

  1. Gurjinder Kaur, Vijayesh Kumar, Nitish Bibhanshu, K. S. Suresh, Indranil Lahiri. Influence of Surface Texture and Composition on Graphene Growth by Chemical Vapor Deposition on Cu–Ni Alloys for Field Emission Application. ACS Applied Nano Materials 2020, 3 (10) , 9804-9812. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.0c01879
  2. Cheng-Yu Dai, Wei-Chun Wang, Chi-Ang Tseng, Fang-Chi Ding, Yit-Tsong Chen, Chiao-Chen Chen. Spatial Confinement Approach Using Ni to Modulate Local Carbon Supply for the Growth of Uniform Transfer-Free Graphene Monolayers. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2020, 124 (42) , 23094-23105. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c05257
  3. Pablo Solís-Fernández, Yuri Terao, Kenji Kawahara, Wataru Nishiyama, Teerayut Uwanno, Yung-Chang Lin, Keisuke Yamamoto, Hiroshi Nakashima, Kosuke Nagashio, Hiroki Hibino, Kazu Suenaga, Hiroki Ago. Isothermal Growth and Stacking Evolution in Highly Uniform Bernal-Stacked Bilayer Graphene. ACS Nano 2020, 14 (6) , 6834-6844. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.0c00645
  4. Sota Hirokawa, Hideaki Teshima, Pablo Solís-Fernández, Hiroki Ago, Yoko Tomo, Qin-Yi Li, Koji Takahashi. Nanoscale Bubble Dynamics Induced by Damage of Graphene Liquid Cells. ACS Omega 2020, 5 (19) , 11180-11185. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.0c01207
  5. Ming Huang, Rodney S. Ruoff. Growth of Single-Layer and Multilayer Graphene on Cu/Ni Alloy Substrates. Accounts of Chemical Research 2020, 53 (4) , 800-811. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.9b00643
  6. Bing Deng, Binbin Wang, Ning Li, Rongtan Li, Yani Wang, Jilin Tang, Qiang Fu, Zhen Tian, Peng Gao, Jiamin Xue, Hailin Peng. Interlayer Decoupling in 30° Twisted Bilayer Graphene Quasicrystal. ACS Nano 2020, 14 (2) , 1656-1664. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.9b07091
  7. Yibo Dong, Sheng Guo, Huahai Mao, Chen Xu, Yiyang Xie, Jun Deng, Le Wang, Zaifa Du, Fangzhu Xiong, Jie Sun. In Situ Growth of CVD Graphene Directly on Dielectric Surface toward Application. ACS Applied Electronic Materials 2020, 2 (1) , 238-246. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaelm.9b00719
  8. Ufuk Erkılıç, Pablo Solís-Fernández, Hyun Goo Ji, Keisuke Shinokita, Yung-Chang Lin, Mina Maruyama, Kazu Suenaga, Susumu Okada, Kazunari Matsuda, Hiroki Ago. Vapor Phase Selective Growth of Two-Dimensional Perovskite/WS2 Heterostructures for Optoelectronic Applications. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2019, 11 (43) , 40503-40511. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b13904
  9. Mohamed K. Elshazly, Jin Hyun Chang, Ahmed Huzayyin, Francis Dawson. Influence of Cu(111) and Ni(111) Substrates on the Capacitances of Monolayer and Bilayer Graphene Supercapacitor Electrodes. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2019, 123 (5) , 2783-2791. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b11211
  10. Hirotaka Imaeda, Takeshi Koyama, Hideo Kishida, Kenji Kawahara, Hiroki Ago, Ryotaro Sakakibara, Wataru Norimatsu, Tomo-o Terasawa, Jianfeng Bao, Michiko Kusunoki. Acceleration of Photocarrier Relaxation in Graphene Achieved by Epitaxial Growth: Ultrafast Photoluminescence Decay of Monolayer Graphene on SiC. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2018, 122 (33) , 19273-19279. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b06845
  11. Zhaoli Gao, Qicheng Zhang, Carl H. Naylor, Youngkuk Kim, Irfan Haider Abidi, Jinglei Ping, Pedro Ducos, Jonathan Zauberman, Meng-Qiang Zhao, Andrew M. Rappe, Zhengtang Luo, Li Ren, Alan T. Charlie Johnson. Crystalline Bilayer Graphene with Preferential Stacking from Ni–Cu Gradient Alloy. ACS Nano 2018, 12 (3) , 2275-2282. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.7b06992
  12. Zonghuan Lu, Xin Sun, Yu Xiang, Morris A. Washington, Gwo-Ching Wang, and Toh-Ming Lu . Revealing the Crystalline Integrity of Wafer-Scale Graphene on SiO2/Si: An Azimuthal RHEED Approach. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2017, 9 (27) , 23081-23091. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b01370
  13. Jianhe Guo, Andrew Chan, Weigu Li, and D. L. Fan . Kirkendall Effect in Creating Three-Dimensional Metal Catalysts for Hierarchically Porous Ultrathin Graphite with Unique Properties. Chemistry of Materials 2017, 29 (11) , 4991-4998. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b01518
  14. Dong Ding, Pablo Solís-Fernández, Hiroki Hibino, and Hiroki Ago . Spatially Controlled Nucleation of Single-Crystal Graphene on Cu Assisted by Stacked Ni. ACS Nano 2016, 10 (12) , 11196-11204. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.6b06265
  15. Huy Q. Ta, David J. Perello, Dinh Loc Duong, Gang Hee Han, Sandeep Gorantla, Van Luan Nguyen, Alicja Bachmatiuk, Slava V. Rotkin, Young Hee Lee, and Mark H. Rümmeli . Stranski–Krastanov and Volmer–Weber CVD Growth Regimes To Control the Stacking Order in Bilayer Graphene. Nano Letters 2016, 16 (10) , 6403-6410. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b02826
  16. Ming Huang, Bangwei Deng, Fan Dong, Lili Zhang, Zheye Zhang, Peng Chen. Substrate Engineering for CVD Growth of Single Crystal Graphene. Small Methods 2021, 306 , 2001213. https://doi.org/10.1002/smtd.202001213
  17. Meihui Wang, Da Luo, Bin Wang, Rodney S. Ruoff. Synthesis of Large-Area Single-Crystal Graphene. Trends in Chemistry 2021, 3 (1) , 15-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trechm.2020.10.009
  18. J. A. Crosse, Pilkyung Moon. Quasicrystalline electronic states in twisted bilayers and the effects of interlayer and sublattice symmetries. Physical Review B 2021, 103 (4) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.103.045408
  19. Yanglizhi Li, Luzhao Sun, Haiyang Liu, Yuechen Wang, Zhongfan Liu. Rational Design of Binary Alloys for Catalytic Growth of Graphene via Chemical Vapor Deposition. Catalysts 2020, 10 (11) , 1305. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal10111305
  20. Joseba Alberdi-Rodriguez, Shree Ram Acharya, Talat S Rahman, Andres Arnau, Miguel A Gosálvez. Dominant contributions to the apparent activation energy in two-dimensional submonolayer growth: comparison between Cu/Ni(111) and Ni/Cu(111). Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 2020, 32 (44) , 445002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-648X/ab9b50
  21. Van Luan Nguyen, Dinh Loc Duong, Sang Hyub Lee, José Avila, Gyeongtak Han, Young-Min Kim, Maria C. Asensio, Se-Young Jeong, Young Hee Lee. Layer-controlled single-crystalline graphene film with stacking order via Cu–Si alloy formation. Nature Nanotechnology 2020, 15 (10) , 861-867. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-020-0743-0
  22. Ya-Ning Ren, Yu Zhang, Yi-Wen Liu, Lin He. Twistronics in graphene-based van der Waals structures. Chinese Physics B 2020, 29 (11) , 117303. https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1056/abbbe2
  23. Zhaoli Gao, Meng-Qiang Zhao, Md Masruck Alam Ashik, Alan T Charlie Johnson. Recentadvances in the propertiesand synthesis of bilayer graphene and transition metal dichalcogenides. Journal of Physics: Materials 2020, 3 (4) , 042003. https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7639/abb58d
  24. Guodong Yu, Zewen Wu, Zhen Zhan, Mikhail I. Katsnelson, Shengjun Yuan. Electronic structure of 30 ∘ twisted double bilayer graphene. Physical Review B 2020, 102 (11) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.102.115123
  25. Guodong Yu, Mikhail I. Katsnelson, Shengjun Yuan. Pressure and electric field dependence of quasicrystalline electronic states in 30 ∘ twisted bilayer graphene. Physical Review B 2020, 102 (4) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.102.045113
  26. Shinpei Ogawa, Shoichiro Fukushima, Masaaki Shimatani. Graphene Plasmonics in Sensor Applications: A Review. Sensors 2020, 20 (12) , 3563. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20123563
  27. Le Wang, Jie Sun, Weiling Guo, Yibo Dong, Yiyang Xie, Fangzhu Xiong, Zaifa Du, Longfei Li, Jun Deng, Chen Xu. High Quality Graphene Thin Films Synthesized by Glow Discharge Method in A Chemical Vapor Deposition System Using Solid Carbon Source. Materials 2020, 13 (9) , 2026. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13092026
  28. Ming Huang, Pavel V. Bakharev, Zhu-Jun Wang, Mandakini Biswal, Zheng Yang, Sunghwan Jin, Bin Wang, Hyo Ju Park, Yunqing Li, Deshun Qu, Youngwoo Kwon, Xianjue Chen, Sun Hwa Lee, Marc-Georg Willinger, Won Jong Yoo, Zonghoon Lee, Rodney S. Ruoff. Large-area single-crystal AB-bilayer and ABA-trilayer graphene grown on a Cu/Ni(111) foil. Nature Nanotechnology 2020, 15 (4) , 289-295. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-019-0622-8
  29. Hongyan Zhu, Chao Zhang, Xuefu Zhang, Zhiyuan Shi, Tianru Wu, Guanghui Yu. Overview of Rational Design of Binary Alloy for the Synthesis of Two-Dimensional Materials. Surfaces 2020, 3 (1) , 26-39. https://doi.org/10.3390/surfaces3010003
  30. Cheng Chen, Manzhang Xu, Zhiyong Zhang, Guoqiang He, Junfeng Yan, Wu Zhao, Jiangni Yun, Johan Stiens. A novel preparation method for uniform large-area graphene films on [email protected] substrate. Materials Today Communications 2019, 21 , 100607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2019.100607
  31. Guodong Yu, Zewen Wu, Zhen Zhan, Mikhail I. Katsnelson, Shengjun Yuan. Dodecagonal bilayer graphene quasicrystal and its approximants. npj Computational Materials 2019, 5 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-019-0258-0
  32. Ploybussara Gomasang, Kenji Kawahara, Kenta Yasuraoka, Mina Maruyama, Hiroki Ago, Susumu Okada, Kazuyoshi Ueno. A novel graphene barrier against moisture by multiple stacking large-grain graphene. Scientific Reports 2019, 9 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-40534-5
  33. Guangyuan Lu, Guanhua Zhang, Julong Sun, Xiujun Wang, Zhiyuan Shi, Da Jiang, Haomin Wang, Ang Li, Tianru Wu, Qingkai Yu, Xiaoming Xie. Synthesis and stacking sequence characterization of h-BN/graphene heterostructures on Cu–Ni alloy. Carbon 2019, 152 , 521-526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2019.06.040
  34. Yibo Dong, Sheng Guo, Huahai Mao, Chen Xu, Yiyang Xie, Chuantong Cheng, Xurui Mao, Jun Deng, Guanzhong Pan, Jie Sun. The Growth of Graphene on Ni–Cu Alloy Thin Films at a Low Temperature and Its Carbon Diffusion Mechanism. Nanomaterials 2019, 9 (11) , 1633. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9111633
  35. Jie Yang, PingAn Hu, Gui Yu. Design of carbon sources: starting point for chemical vapor deposition of graphene. 2D Materials 2019, 6 (4) , 042003. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1583/ab31bd
  36. Chitengfei Zhang, Rong Tu, Mingdong Dong, Jun Li, Meijun Yang, Qizhong Li, Ji Shi, Haiwen Li, Hitoshi Ohmori, Song Zhang, Lianmeng Zhang, Takashi Goto. Growth of umbrella-like millimeter-scale single-crystalline graphene on liquid copper. Carbon 2019, 150 , 356-362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2019.05.013
  37. Dinh‐Tuan Nguyen, Ya‐Ping Hsieh, Mario Hofmann. Graphene—Synthesis and Quality Optimization. 2019,,, 41-62. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119468455.ch2
  38. , , , , , , , , . Handbook of Graphene. 2019,,https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119468455
  39. Hao Ying, Weiwei Wang, Wenyu Liu, Le Wang, Shanshan Chen. Layer-by-layer synthesis of bilayer and multilayer graphene on Cu foil utilizing the catalytic activity of cobalt nano-powders. Carbon 2019, 146 , 549-556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2019.02.024
  40. Bing Deng, Zhaowei Xin, Ruiwen Xue, Shishu Zhang, Xiaozhi Xu, Jing Gao, Jilin Tang, Yue Qi, Yani Wang, Yan Zhao, Luzhao Sun, Huihui Wang, Kaihui Liu, Mark H. Rummeli, Lu-Tao Weng, Zhengtang Luo, Lianming Tong, Xinyu Zhang, Changsheng Xie, Zhongfan Liu, Hailin Peng. Scalable and ultrafast epitaxial growth of single-crystal graphene wafers for electrically tunable liquid-crystal microlens arrays. Science Bulletin 2019, 64 (10) , 659-668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scib.2019.04.030
  41. Takatoshi Yamada, Yuki Okigawa, Masataka Hasegawa. Potassium-doped n-type stacked graphene layers. Materials Research Express 2019, 6 (5) , 055009. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/ab0159
  42. Pilkyung Moon, Mikito Koshino, Young-Woo Son. Quasicrystalline electronic states in 30 ∘ rotated twisted bilayer graphene. Physical Review B 2019, 99 (16) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.99.165430
  43. Jichen Dong, Leining Zhang, Feng Ding. Kinetics of Graphene and 2D Materials Growth. Advanced Materials 2019, 31 (9) , 1801583. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201801583
  44. Yunbiao Zhao, Xu Wang, Engang Fu, Dong Han, Peipei Wang, Zaoming Wu, Yi Chen, Yuhan Chen, Ziqiang Zhao. Direct synthesis of high-quality nitrogen-doped graphene via ion implantation. Carbon 2018, 139 , 732-739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2018.06.063
  45. Benjamin Huet, Jean-Pierre Raskin. Role of Cu foil in-situ annealing in controlling the size and thickness of CVD graphene domains. Carbon 2018, 129 , 270-280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2017.12.043
  46. Zonghuan Lu, Xin Sun, Morris A Washington, Toh-Ming Lu. Quasi van der Waals epitaxy of copper thin film on single-crystal graphene monolayer buffer. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 2018, 51 (9) , 095301. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6463/aaa875
  47. Mohammad Rezwan Habib, Tao Liang, Xuegong Yu, Xiaodong Pi, Yingchun Liu, Mingsheng Xu. A review of theoretical study of graphene chemical vapor deposition synthesis on metals: nucleation, growth, and the role of hydrogen and oxygen. Reports on Progress in Physics 2018, 81 (3) , 036501. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6633/aa9bbf
  48. Alireza Khanaki, Hao Tian, Zhongguang Xu, Renjing Zheng, Yanwei He, Zhenjun Cui, Jingchuan Yang, Jianlin Liu. Effect of high carbon incorporation in Co substrates on the epitaxy of hexagonal boron nitride/graphene heterostructures. Nanotechnology 2018, 29 (3) , 035602. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6528/aa9c58
  49. Adha Sukma Aji, Pablo Solís-Fernández, Hyun Goo Ji, Kenjiro Fukuda, Hiroki Ago. High Mobility WS 2 Transistors Realized by Multilayer Graphene Electrodes and Application to High Responsivity Flexible Photodetectors. Advanced Functional Materials 2017, 27 (47) , 1703448. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201703448
  50. Hiroki Kinoshita, Il Jeon, Mina Maruyama, Kenji Kawahara, Yuri Terao, Dong Ding, Rika Matsumoto, Yutaka Matsuo, Susumu Okada, Hiroki Ago. Highly Conductive and Transparent Large-Area Bilayer Graphene Realized by MoCl 5 Intercalation. Advanced Materials 2017, 29 (41) , 1702141. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201702141
  51. Qian Yang, Baoshan Hu, Yan Jin, Zhengtang Luo, Flemming Besenbacher, Liang Fang, Lichun Dong, Mingdong Dong. Regulating Surficial Catalysis Mechanism of Copper Metal by Manipulating Reactive Intermediate for Growth of Homogenous Bernal-Stacked Bilayer Graphene. Advanced Materials Interfaces 2017, 4 (17) , 1700415. https://doi.org/10.1002/admi.201700415
  52. Min Seok Yoo, Hyo Chan Lee, Siyoung Lee, Seon Baek Lee, Nam-Suk Lee, Kilwon Cho. Chemical Vapor Deposition of Bernal-Stacked Graphene on a Cu Surface by Breaking the Carbon Solubility Symmetry in Cu Foils. Advanced Materials 2017, 29 (32) , 1700753. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201700753
  53. Gwangseok Yang, Hong-Yeol Kim, Jihyun Kim. Graphitization of self-assembled monolayers using patterned nickel-copper layers. Applied Physics Letters 2017, 111 (4) , 043102. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4995412
  54. Jun Wu, Junyong Wang, Danfeng Pan, Yongchao Li, Chenghuan Jiang, Yingbin Li, Chen Jin, Kang Wang, Fengqi Song, Guanghou Wang, Hao Zhang, Jianguo Wan. Synchronous Growth of High-Quality Bilayer Bernal Graphene: From Hexagonal Single-Crystal Domains to Wafer-Scale Homogeneous Films. Advanced Functional Materials 2017, 27 (22) , 1605927. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201605927
  55. Golap Kalita, Masaki Tanemura. Fundamentals of Chemical Vapor Deposited Graphene and Emerging Applications. 2017,,https://doi.org/10.5772/67514
  56. , . Graphene Materials - Advanced Applications. 2017,,https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.68679
  57. Remi Papon, Kamal P. Sharma, Rakesh D. Mahayavanshi, Subash Sharma, Riteshkumar Vishwakarma, Mohamad Saufi Rosmi, Toshio Kawahara, Joseph Cline, Golap Kalita, Masaki Tanemura. CuNi binary alloy catalyst for growth of nitrogen-doped graphene by low pressure chemical vapor deposition. physica status solidi (RRL) - Rapid Research Letters 2016, 10 (10) , 749-752. https://doi.org/10.1002/pssr.201600298
  • Abstract

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. (a) Schematics of the CVD growth of uniform bilayer graphene over a Cu–Ni alloy film deposited on a sapphire c-plane substrate. (b–d) Optical microscope images of graphene transferred on SiO2/Si substrates grown under different CVD conditions. (b) Temperature dependence for Cu-80%/Ni-20% catalyst. (c) Effect of slow cooling process instead of the rapid cooling used in panel b. (d) Optimization of the Ni concentration for the condition optimized in panels b and c. (e) Optical transmission spectra of BLG (red curve, Ni-22%/Cu-78%) and MLG (blue curve, pure Cu) transferred on quartz substrates. Inset shows the photograph of the samples on a SiO2/Si substrate.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. Depth profiles of elements measured by XPS for the (a) as-sputtered Cu/Ni film and (b) that after the CVD for BLG growth. Blue, red, and black plots show Cu, Ni, and C, respectively. Inset of panel a is a photograph of the samples. The surface color of the as-sputtered film (left) changed to silver after the CVD (right), reflecting the formation of Cu–Ni alloy. (c) Cross-sectional EDS mapping images for Cu and Ni. (d) XRD profiles of the as-sputtered film and that after the BLG-CVD.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. (a) Optical micrograph of transferred BLG and (b) the corresponding Raman mapping images of the relative intensity of 2D band to G band (I2D/IG). (c) Raman spectra marked in panel b. Inset shows the 2D band shape of the spectrum 2, which is fitted with four Lorentzian curves (the gray broken lines). The fitted curve is shown by the red broken line. Distribution of (d) I2D/IG ratio and (e) fwhm2D measured for 300 different spots of a transferred graphene sheet. Red and gray data show AB stacked and twist BLG grains, respectively.

    Figure 4

    Figure 4. (a) BF-LEEM image and (b–d) corresponding diffraction patterns. The diffraction was measured at the points 1, 2, and 3, marked in panel a. In , panels b−d, “1L G” denotes the diffraction from monolayer graphene, while “upper G” and “lower G” are those from upper and lower graphene sheets of bilayer graphene, respectively.

    Figure 5

    Figure 5. LEEM analysis of the CVD-grown BLG sheet on a Cu−Ni thin film. (a–c) BF LEEM images. (a) Uniform BLG. (b) Different area with MLG, which appears dark. (c) Magnified image of white circle in panel b. (d) Reflection spectra of spots 1, 2, 3 shown in panel c. (e–h) Top rows: LEEM images measured with different diffraction angle conditions. The colored areas indicate the upper/lower layers with rotation angles with respect to the original Cu(111) diffraction. Areas marked with white lines indicate the grains, which have Bernal (AB) stacking. Middle rows: Selected area diffraction taken from the points marked in the top rows. Bottom images of panels e–h show orientations of upper and lower graphene layers determined for the positions A–D from the corresponding diffraction patterns. All scale bars are 5 μm.

    Figure 6

    Figure 6. Binding energies of planar π-conjugated molecules adsorbed on (a) Cu and (b) Cu–Ni(111) alloy surfaces. The binding energies were determined by DFT calculations for relative orientations. Right panels show the atomic images of 0° and 30° orientation. Yellow and green atoms indicate Cu and Ni atoms, respectively.

    Figure 7

    Figure 7. Schematic of the growth mechanism of BLG on Cu–Ni metal alloy catalyst. (a) As-sputtered, Cu/Ni stacked film. (b) Cu–Ni alloy is formed during heating the substrate for graphene growth. (c) MLG starts to grow on the alloy surface, while some carbon atoms diffuse into the bulk of the alloy. (d) MLG covers the whole alloy surface with a sufficient amount of dissolved C atoms. (e) During cooling process, the second layer is segregated to form BLG. Yellow, green, black, and red show Cu, Ni, C, and H atoms, respectively.

  • References

    ARTICLE SECTIONS
    Jump To

    This article references 57 other publications.

    1. 1
      Zurutuza, A.; Marinelli, C. Challenges and Opportunities in Graphene Commercialization Nat. Nanotechnol. 2014, 9, 730 734 DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2014.225
    2. 2
      Sato, S. Graphene for Nanoelectronics Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2015, 54, 040102 DOI: 10.7567/JJAP.54.040102
    3. 3
      Ma, L.; Wang, J.; Ding, F. Recent Progress and Challenges in Graphene Nanoribbon Synthesis ChemPhysChem 2013, 14, 47 54 DOI: 10.1002/cphc.201200253
    4. 4
      Guinea, F.; Katsnelson, M. I.; Geim, A. K. Energy Gaps and a Zero-Field Quantum Hall Effect in Graphene by Strain Engineering Nat. Phys. 2010, 6, 30 33 DOI: 10.1038/nphys1420
    5. 5
      Loh, K. P.; Bao, Q.; Ang, P. K.; Yang, J. The Chemistry of Graphene J. Mater. Chem. 2010, 20, 2277 2289 DOI: 10.1039/b920539j
    6. 6
      Oostinga, J. B.; Heersche, H. B.; Liu, X.; Morpurgo, A. F.; Vandersypen, L. M. K. Gate-Induced Insulating State in Bilayer Graphene Devices Nat. Mater. 2008, 7, 151 157 DOI: 10.1038/nmat2082
    7. 7
      Zhang, Y.; Tang, T.-T.; Girit, C.; Hao, Z.; Martin, M. C.; Zettl, A.; Crommie, M. F.; Shen, Y. R.; Wang, F. Direct Observation of a Widely Tunable Bandgap in Bilayer Graphene Nature 2009, 459, 820 823 DOI: 10.1038/nature08105
    8. 8
      Mak, K. F.; Lui, C. H.; Shan, J.; Heinz, T. F. Observation of an Electric-Field-Induced Band Gap in Bilayer Graphene by Infrared Spectroscopy Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009, 102, 256405 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.256405
    9. 9
      Xia, F.; Farmer, D. B.; Lin, Y.-M.; Avouris, P. Graphene Field-Effect Transistors with High On/Off Current Ratio and Large Transport Band Gap at Room Temperature Nano Lett. 2010, 10, 715 718 DOI: 10.1021/nl9039636
    10. 10
      Li, S.-L.; Miyazaki, H.; Hiura, H.; Liu, C.; Tsukagoshi, K. Enhanced Logic Performance with Semiconducting Bilayer Graphene Channels ACS Nano 2011, 5, 500 506 DOI: 10.1021/nn102346b
    11. 11
      Yamashiro, Y.; Ohno, Y.; Maehashi, K.; Inoue, K.; Matsumoto, K. Electric-Field-Induced Band Gap of Bilayer Graphene in Ionic Liquid J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 2012, 30, 03D111 DOI: 10.1116/1.3699011
    12. 12
      Chu, T.; Chen, Z. Achieving Large Transport Bandgaps in Bilayer Graphene Nano Res. 2015, 8, 3228 3236 DOI: 10.1007/s12274-015-0823-x
    13. 13
      Kanayama, K.; Nagashio, K. Gap State Analysis in Electric-Field-Induced Band Gap for Bilayer Graphene Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 15789 DOI: 10.1038/srep15789
    14. 14
      Koehler, F. M.; Jacobsen, A.; Ensslin, K.; Stampfer, C.; Stark, W. J. Selective Chemical Modification of Graphene Surfaces: Distinction Between Single- and Bilayer Graphene Small 2010, 6, 1125 1130 DOI: 10.1002/smll.200902370
    15. 15
      Wang, Q. H.; Shih, C.-J.; Paulus, G. L. C.; Strano, M. S. Evolution of Physical and Electronic Structures of Bilayer Graphene upon Chemical Functionalization J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 18866 18875 DOI: 10.1021/ja4083914
    16. 16
      Bissett, M. A.; Takesaki, Y.; Tsuji, M.; Ago, H. Increased Chemical Reactivity Achieved by Asymmetrical ‘Janus’ Functionalisation of Graphene RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 52215 52219 DOI: 10.1039/C4RA09724F
    17. 17
      Nakada, K.; Fujita, M.; Dresselhaus, G.; Dresselhaus, M. S. Edge State in Graphene Ribbons: Nanometer Size Effect and Edge Shape Dependence Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 1996, 54, 17954 17961 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.17954
    18. 18
      Lee, S.; Lee, K.; Zhong, Z. Wafer Scale Homogeneous Bilayer Graphene Films by Chemical Vapor Deposition Nano Lett. 2010, 10, 4702 4707 DOI: 10.1021/nl1029978
    19. 19
      Yan, K.; Peng, H.; Zhou, Y.; Li, H.; Liu, Z. Formation of Bilayer Bernal Graphene: Layer-by-Layer Epitaxy via Chemical Vapor Deposition Nano Lett. 2011, 11, 1106 1110 DOI: 10.1021/nl104000b
    20. 20
      Liu, L.; Zhou, H.; Cheng, R.; Yu, W. J.; Liu, Y.; Chen, Y.; Shaw, J.; Zhong, X.; Huang, Y.; Duan, X. High-Yield Chemical Vapor Deposition Growth of High-Quality Large-Area AB-Stacked Bilayer Graphene ACS Nano 2012, 6, 8241 8249 DOI: 10.1021/nn302918x
    21. 21
      Sun, Z.; Raji, A.-R. O.; Zhu, Y.; Xiang, C.; Yan, Z.; Kittrell, C.; Samuel, E. L. G.; Tour, J. M. Large-Area Bernal-Stacked Bi-, Tri-, and Tetralayer Graphene ACS Nano 2012, 6, 9790 9796 DOI: 10.1021/nn303328e
    22. 22
      Wassei, J. K.; Mecklenburg, M.; Torres, J. A.; Fowler, J. D.; Regan, B. C.; Kaner, R. B.; Weiller, B. H. Chemical Vapor Deposition of Graphene on Copper from Methane, Ethane and Propane: Evidence for Bilayer Selectivity Small 2012, 8, 1415 1422 DOI: 10.1002/smll.201102276
    23. 23
      Zhao, P.; Kim, S.; Chen, X.; Einarsson, E.; Wang, M.; Song, Y.; Wang, H.; Chiashi, S.; Xiang, R.; Maruyama, S. Equilibrium Chemical Vapor Deposition Growth of Bernal-Stacked Bilayer Graphene ACS Nano 2014, 8, 11631 11638 DOI: 10.1021/nn5049188
    24. 24
      Li, X.; Cai, W.; An, J.; Kim, S.; Nah, J.; Yang, D.; Piner, R.; Velamakanni, A.; Jung, I.; Tutuc, E.; Banerjee, S. K.; Colombo, L.; Ruoff, R. S. Large-Area Synthesis of High-Quality and Uniform Graphene Films on Copper Foils Science 2009, 324, 1312 1314 DOI: 10.1126/science.1171245
    25. 25
      Vlassiouk, I.; Regmi, M.; Fulvio, P.; Dai, S.; Datskos, P.; Eres, G.; Smirnov, S. Role of Hydrogen in Chemical Vapor Deposition Growth of Large Single-Crystal Graphene ACS Nano 2011, 5, 6069 6076 DOI: 10.1021/nn201978y
    26. 26
      Wu, B.; Geng, D.; Guo, Y.; Huang, L.; Xue, Y.; Zheng, J.; Chen, J.; Yu, G.; Liu, Y.; Jiang, L.; Hu, W. Equiangular Hexagon-Shape-Controlled Synthesis of Graphene on Copper Surface Adv. Mater. 2011, 23, 3522 3525 DOI: 10.1002/adma.201101746
    27. 27
      Nie, S.; Wu, W.; Xing, S.; Yu, Q.; Bao, J.; Pei, S.-S.; McCarty, K. F. Growth from Below: Bilayer Graphene on Copper by Chemical Vapor Deposition New J. Phys. 2012, 14, 093028 DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/14/9/093028
    28. 28
      Kalbac, M.; Frank, O.; Kavan, L. The Control of Graphene Double-Layer Formation in Copper-Catalyzed Chemical Vapor Deposition Carbon 2012, 50, 3682 3687 DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2012.03.041
    29. 29
      Yan, Z.; Liu, Y.; Ju, L.; Peng, Z.; Lin, J.; Wang, G.; Zhou, H.; Xiang, C.; Samuel, E. L. G.; Kittrell, C.; Artyukhov, V. I.; Wang, F.; Yakobson, B. I.; Tour, J. M. Large Hexagonal Bi- and Trilayer Graphene Single Crystals with Varied Interlayer Rotations Angew. Chem. 2014, 126, 1591 1595 DOI: 10.1002/ange.201306317
    30. 30
      Yeh, C.-H.; Lin, Y.-C.; Nayak, P. K.; Lu, C.-C.; Liu, Z.; Suenaga, K.; Chiu, P.-W. Probing Interlayer Coupling in Twisted Single-Crystal Bilayer Graphene by Raman Spectroscopy J. Raman Spectrosc. 2014, 45, 912 917 DOI: 10.1002/jrs.4571
    31. 31
      Fang, W.; Hsu, A. L.; Caudillo, R.; Song, Y.; Birdwell, A. G.; Zakar, E.; Kalbac, M.; Dubey, M.; Palacios, T.; Dresselhaus, M. S.; Araujo, P. T.; Kong, J. Rapid Identification of Stacking Orientation in Isotopically Labeled Chemical-Vapor Grown Bilayer Graphene by Raman Spectroscopy Nano Lett. 2013, 13, 1541 1548 DOI: 10.1021/nl304706j
    32. 32
      Hao, Y.; Wang, L.; Liu, Y.; Chen, H.; Wang, X.; Tan, C.; Nie, S.; Suk, J. W.; Jiang, T.; Liang, T.; Xiao, J.; Ye, W.; Dean, C. R.; Yakobson, B. I.; McCarty, K. F.; Kim, P.; Hone, J.; Colombo, L.; Ruoff, R. S. Oxygen-Activated Growth and Bandgap Tunability of Large Single-Crystal Bilayer Graphene Nat. Nanotechnol. 2016, 11, 426 431 DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2015.322
    33. 33
      Liu, X.; Fu, L.; Liu, N.; Gao, T.; Zhang, Y.; Liao, L.; Liu, Z. Segregation Growth of Graphene on Cu−Ni Alloy for Precise Layer Control J. Phys. Chem. C 2011, 115, 11976 11982 DOI: 10.1021/jp202933u
    34. 34
      Wu, Y.; Chou, H.; Ji, H.; Wu, Q.; Chen, S.; Jiang, W.; Hao, Y.; Kang, J.; Ren, Y.; Piner, R. D.; Ruoff, R. S. Growth Mechanism and Controlled Synthesis of AB-Stacked Bilayer Graphene on Cu-Ni Alloy Foils ACS Nano 2012, 6, 7731 7738 DOI: 10.1021/nn301689m
    35. 35
      Liu, W.; Kraemer, S.; Sarkar, D.; Li, H.; Ajayan, P. M.; Banerjee, K. Controllable and Rapid Synthesis of High-Quality and Large-Area Bernal Stacked Bilayer Graphene Using Chemical Vapor Deposition Chem. Mater. 2014, 26, 907 915 DOI: 10.1021/cm4021854
    36. 36
      Lin, T.; Huang, F.; Wan, D.; Bi, H.; Xie, X.; Jiang, M. Self-Regulating Homogenous Growth of High-Quality Graphene on Co–Cu Composite Substrate for Layer Control Nanoscale 2013, 5, 5847 5853 DOI: 10.1039/c3nr33124e
    37. 37
      Lu, C.-C.; Lin, Y.-C.; Liu, Z.; Yeh, C.-H.; Suenaga, K.; Chiu, P.-W. Twisting Bilayer Graphene Superlattices ACS Nano 2013, 7, 2587 2594 DOI: 10.1021/nn3059828
    38. 38
      Havener, R. W.; Zhuang, H.; Brown, L.; Hennig, R. G.; Park, J. Angle-Resolved Raman Imaging of Interlayer Rotations and Interactions in Twisted Bilayer Graphene Nano Lett. 2012, 12, 3162 3267 DOI: 10.1021/nl301137k
    39. 39
      Hu, B.; Ago, H.; Ito, Y.; Kawahara, K.; Tsuji, M.; Magome, E.; Sumitani, K.; Mizuta, N.; Ikeda, K.; Mizuno, S. Epitaxial Growth of Large-Area Single-Layer Graphene over Cu(111)/Sapphire by Atmospheric Pressure CVD Carbon 2012, 50, 57 65 DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2011.08.002
    40. 40
      Ago, H.; Kawahara, K.; Ogawa, Y.; Tanoue, S.; Bissett, M. A.; Tsuji, M.; Sakaguchi, H.; Koch, R. J.; Fromm, F.; Seyller, T.; Komatsu, K.; Tsukagoshi, K. Epitaxial Growth and Electronic Properties of Large Hexagonal Graphene Domains on Cu(111) Thin Film Appl. Phys. Express 2013, 6, 075101 DOI: 10.7567/APEX.6.075101
    41. 41
      Ago, H.; Ito, Y.; Mizuta, N.; Yoshida, K.; Hu, B.; Orofeo, C. M.; Tsuji, M.; Ikeda, K.; Mizuno, S. Epitaxial Chemical Vapor Deposition Growth of Single-Layer Graphene over Cobalt Film Crystallized on Sapphire ACS Nano 2010, 4, 7407 7414 DOI: 10.1021/nn102519b
    42. 42
      Blake, P.; Hill, E. W.; Castro Neto, A. H.; Novoselov, K. S.; Jiang, D.; Yang, R.; Booth, T. J.; Geim, A. K. Making Graphene Visible Appl. Phys. Lett. 2007, 91, 063124 DOI: 10.1063/1.2768624
    43. 43
      Perdew, J. P.; Burke, K.; Ernzerhof, M. Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996, 77, 3865 3868 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865
    44. 44
      Hamada, I.; Otani, M. Comparative van der Waals Density-Functional Study of Graphene on Metal Surfaces Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2010, 82, 153412 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.82.153412
    45. 45
      Otani, M.; Sugino, O. First-Principles Calculations of Charged Surfaces and Interfaces: A Plane-Wave Nonrepeated Slab Approach Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2006, 73, 115407 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.73.115407
    46. 46
      Amano, H. Growth of GaN Layers on Sapphire by Low-Temperature-Deposited Buffer Layers and Realization of p-type GaN by Magnesium Doping and Electron Beam Irradiation Angew. Chem. 2015, 54, 7764 7769 DOI: 10.1002/anie.201501651
    47. 47
      Luo, Z.; Lu, Y.; Singer, D. W.; Berck, M. E.; Somers, L. A.; Goldsmith, B. R.; Johnson, A. T. C. Effect of Substrate Roughness and Feedstock Concentration on Growth of Wafer-Scale Graphene at Atmospheric Pressure Chem. Mater. 2011, 23, 1441 1447 DOI: 10.1021/cm1028854
    48. 48
      Zhang, Y.; Gomez, L.; Ishikawa, F. N.; Madaria, A.; Ryu, K.; Wang, C.; Badmaev, A.; Zhou, C. Comparison of Graphene Growth on Single-Crystalline and Polycrystalline Ni by Chemical Vapor Deposition J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2010, 1, 3101 3107 DOI: 10.1021/jz1011466
    49. 49
      Reina, A.; Thiele, S.; Jia, X.; Bhaviripudi, S.; Dresselhaus, M. S.; Schaefer, J. A.; Kong, J. Growth of Large-Area Single- and Bi-Layer Graphene by Controlled Carbon Precipitation on Polycrystalline Ni Surfaces Nano Res. 2009, 2, 509 516 DOI: 10.1007/s12274-009-9059-y
    50. 50
      Odahara, G.; Otani, S.; Oshima, C.; Suzuki, M.; Yasue, T.; Koshikawa, T. In-situ Observation of Graphene Growth on Ni(111) Surf. Sci. 2011, 605, 1095 1098 DOI: 10.1016/j.susc.2011.03.011
    51. 51
      Nair, R. R.; Blake, P.; Grigorenko, A. N.; Novoselov, K. S.; Booth, T. J.; Stauber, T.; Peres, N. M. R.; Geim, A. K. Fine Structure Constant Defines Visual Transparency of Graphene Science 2008, 320, 1308 DOI: 10.1126/science.1156965
    52. 52
      Butrymowicz, D. B.; Manning, J. R.; Read, M. E. Diffusion in Copper and Copper Alloyes. Part IV. Diffusion in Systems Involving Elements of Group VIII J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 1976, 5, 103 200 DOI: 10.1063/1.555528
    53. 53
      Ferrari, A. C.; Meyer, J. C.; Scardaci, V.; Casiraghi, C.; Lazzeri, M.; Mauri, F.; Piscanec, S.; Jiang, D.; Novoselov, K. S.; Roth, S.; Geim, A. K. Raman Spectrum of Graphene and Graphene Layers Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006, 97, 187401 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.187401
    54. 54
      Hibino, H.; Kageshima, H.; Maeda, F.; Nagase, M.; Kobayashi, Y.; Yamaguchi, H. Microscopic Thickness Determination of Thin Graphite Films Formed on SiC from Quantized Oscillation in Reflectivity of Low-Energy Electrons Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2008, 77, 075413 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.77.075413
    55. 55
      Ago, H.; Ohta, Y.; Hibino, H.; Yoshimura, D.; Takizawa, R.; Uchida, Y.; Tsuji, M.; Okajima, T.; Mitani, H.; Mizuno, S. Growth Dynamics of Single-Layer Graphene on Epitaxial Cu Surfaces Chem. Mater. 2015, 27, 5377 5385 DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b01871
    56. 56
      Zhao, H.; Lin, Y.-C.; Yeh, C.-H.; Tian, H.; Chen, Y.-C.; Xie, D.; Yang, Y.; Suenaga, K.; Ren, T.-L.; Chiu, P.-W. Growth and Raman Spectra of Single-Crystal Trilayer Graphene with Different Stacking Orientations ACS Nano 2014, 8, 10766 10773 DOI: 10.1021/nn5044959
    57. 57
      Vanin, M.; Mortensen, J. J.; Kelkkanen, A. K.; Garcia-Lastra, J. M.; Thygesen, K. S.; Jacobsen, K. W. Graphene on Metals: A van der Waals Density Functional Study Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2010, 81, 081408 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.081408
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information

    ARTICLE SECTIONS
    Jump To

    The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b01137.

    • Experimental procedure, effect of the Cu–Ni stacking order, additional optical microscope and LEEM images, and AB-stacked and twist bilayer graphene grains grown on Cu(111) (PDF)


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

You’ve supercharged your research process with ACS and Mendeley!

STEP 1:
Click to create an ACS ID

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

OOPS

You have to login with your ACS ID befor you can login with your Mendeley account.

MENDELEY PAIRING EXPIRED
Your Mendeley pairing has expired. Please reconnect

This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By continuing to use the site, you are accepting our use of cookies. Read the ACS privacy policy.

CONTINUE