ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
Performance Limits of Photoelectrochemical CO2 Reduction Based on Known Electrocatalysts and the Case for Two-Electron Reduction Products
My Activity
    Perspective

    Performance Limits of Photoelectrochemical CO2 Reduction Based on Known Electrocatalysts and the Case for Two-Electron Reduction Products
    Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

    View Author Information
    SurfCat, Department of Physics, Technical University of Denmark (DTU), B. 312, Fysikvej DK-2800, Denmark
    Other Access OptionsSupporting Information (1)

    Chemistry of Materials

    Cite this: Chem. Mater. 2016, 28, 24, 8844–8850
    Click to copy citationCitation copied!
    https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b03927
    Published November 17, 2016
    Copyright © 2016 American Chemical Society

    Abstract

    Click to copy section linkSection link copied!
    Abstract Image

    Solar-driven reduction of CO2 to solar fuels as an alternative to H2 via water splitting is an intriguing proposition. We model the solar-to-fuel (STF) efficiencies using realistic parameters based on recently reported CO2 reduction catalysts with a high performance tandem photoabsorber structure. CO and formate, which are both two-electron reduction products, offer STF efficiencies (20.0% and 18.8%) competitively close to that of solar H2 (21.8%) despite markedly worse reduction catalysis. The slightly lower efficiency toward carbon products is mainly due to electrolyte resistance, not overpotential. Using a cell design where electrolyte resistance is minimized makes formate the preferred product from an efficiency standpoint (reaching 22.7% STF efficiency). On the other hand, going beyond a 2 electron reduction reaction, the more highly reduced products seem unviable with presently available electrocatalysts due to excessive overpotentials and poor selectivity. This work considers breaking up the multielectron reduction pathway into individually optimized, separate two-electron steps as a way forward.

    Copyright © 2016 American Chemical Society

    Read this article

    To access this article, please review the available access options below.

    Get instant access

    Purchase Access

    Read this article for 48 hours. Check out below using your ACS ID or as a guest.

    Recommended

    Access through Your Institution

    You may have access to this article through your institution.

    Your institution does not have access to this content. Add or change your institution or let them know you’d like them to include access.

    Supporting Information

    Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

    The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b03927.

    • Study of STF efficiency changes for variation of standard model parameters (PDF)

    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

    Cited By

    Click to copy section linkSection link copied!
    Citation Statements
    Explore this article's citation statements on scite.ai

    This article is cited by 32 publications.

    1. Yi Zhang, Ming-Yu Qi, Marco Conte, Zi-Rong Tang, Yi-Jun Xu. Efficient Photoredox Co-Upcycling of CO2 and Plastic Waste by Band-Gap-Engineered ZnxCd1–xS Catalyst. ACS Materials Letters 2025, 7 (1) , 359-367. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsmaterialslett.4c02142
    2. Kathrin Naumann, Tim Tichter, Rasmus S. Nielsen, Brian Seger, Ole Hansen, Ib Chorkendorff, Peter C. K. Vesborg. Protection Materials on III–V Semiconductors for Photoelectrochemical CO Reduction. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2024, 128 (48) , 20549-20558. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.4c04782
    3. Lujie Zuo, Yuchao Deng, Lu Chen, Ting He, Jinhu Yang, Jiansheng Zhang. Fundamental Insights into Photoelectrochemical Carbon Dioxide Reduction: Elucidating the Reaction Pathways. ACS Catalysis 2024, 14 (22) , 16795-16833. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.4c04795
    4. Bingxin Liu, Lushan Ma, Hao Feng, Ying Zhang, Jingjing Duan, Yongjie Wang, Dong Liu, Qiang Li. Photovoltaic-Powered Electrochemical CO2 Reduction: Benchmarking against the Theoretical Limit. ACS Energy Letters 2023, 8 (2) , 981-987. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.2c02906
    5. Sheng Chu, Pengfei Ou, Pegah Ghamari, Srinivas Vanka, Baowen Zhou, Ishiang Shih, Jun Song, Zetian Mi. Photoelectrochemical CO2 Reduction into Syngas with the Metal/Oxide Interface. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2018, 140 (25) , 7869-7877. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.8b03067
    6. Gowri M. Sriramagiri, Nuha Ahmed, Wesley Luc, Kevin D. Dobson, Steven S. Hegedus, and Feng Jiao . Toward a Practical Solar-Driven CO2 Flow Cell Electrolyzer: Design and Optimization. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 2017, 5 (11) , 10959-10966. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b02853
    7. Gastón O. Larrazábal, Antonio J. Martín, and Javier Pérez-Ramírez . Building Blocks for High Performance in Electrocatalytic CO2 Reduction: Materials, Optimization Strategies, and Device Engineering. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 2017, 8 (16) , 3933-3944. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b01380
    8. Thomas Hannappel, Sahar Shekarabi, Wolfram Jaegermann, Erich Runge, Jan Philipp Hofmann, Roel van de Krol, Matthias M. May, Agnieszka Paszuk, Franziska Hess, Arno Bergmann, Andreas Bund, Christian Cierpka, Christian Dreßler, Fabio Dionigi, Dennis Friedrich, Marco Favaro, Stefan Krischok, Mario Kurniawan, Kathy Lüdge, Yong Lei, Beatriz Roldán Cuenya, Peter Schaaf, Rüdiger Schmidt‐Grund, Wolf Gero Schmidt, Peter Strasser, Eva Unger, Manuel F. Vasquez Montoya, Dong Wang, Hongbin Zhang. Integration of Multijunction Absorbers and Catalysts for Efficient Solar‐Driven Artificial Leaf Structures: A Physical and Materials Science Perspective. Solar RRL 2024, 8 (11) https://doi.org/10.1002/solr.202301047
    9. Muhammad Ali Raza, Huiying Tian, Ziyi Shui, Liangliang Zhu, Meidan Que, Xi Chen. Hierarchical ternary layered double hydroxide/graphitic carbon nitride heterostructures as visible-light photocatalysts for efficient reduction of CO2. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 2022, 655 , 130249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2022.130249
    10. Youn Jeong Jang, Chohee Lee, Yong Hyun Moon, Seokwoo Choe. Solar-Driven Syngas Production Using Al-Doped ZnTe Nanorod Photocathodes. Materials 2022, 15 (9) , 3102. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15093102
    11. Yang Zhang, Donglai Pan, Ying Tao, Huan Shang, Dieqing Zhang, Guisheng Li, Hexing Li. Photoelectrocatalytic Reduction of CO 2 to Syngas via SnO x ‐Enhanced Cu 2 O Nanowires Photocathodes. Advanced Functional Materials 2022, 32 (8) https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202109600
    12. Bastian Mei, Kasper Wenderich. Principles and Limitations of Photoelectrochemical Fuel Generation. 2021, 77-100. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527815296.ch4
    13. Pongkarn Chakthranont. Photoelectrochemical processes for energy applications. 2021, 169-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-821506-7.00007-7
    14. Dowon Bae, Gerasimos Kanellos, Gerrit M. Faasse, Emil Dražević, Anirudh Venugopal, Wilson A. Smith. Design principles for efficient photoelectrodes in solar rechargeable redox flow cell applications. Communications Materials 2020, 1 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s43246-020-0020-7
    15. Damián Monllor-Satoca, María Isabel Díez-García, Teresa Lana-Villarreal, Roberto Gómez. Photoelectrocatalytic production of solar fuels with semiconductor oxides: materials, activity and modeling. Chemical Communications 2020, 56 (82) , 12272-12289. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0CC04387G
    16. Yanjun Xiao, Yao Qian, Anqi Chen, Tian Qin, Fan Zhang, Hehua Tang, Zetian Qiu, Bo-Lin Lin. An artificial photosynthetic system with CO 2 -reducing solar-to-fuel efficiency exceeding 20%. Journal of Materials Chemistry A 2020, 8 (35) , 18310-18317. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0TA06714H
    17. Francis Doherty, Hui Wang, Ming Yang, Bryan R. Goldsmith. Nanocluster and single-atom catalysts for thermocatalytic conversion of CO and CO 2. Catalysis Science & Technology 2020, 10 (17) , 5772-5791. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0CY01316A
    18. Gopalram Keerthiga, Peramaiah Karthik, Bernaurdshaw Neppolian. Application of Metal–Organic Framework and Their Derived Materials in Electrocatalysis. 2020, 357-376. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119651079.ch13
    19. Evangelos Kalamaras, Huizhi Wang, M. Mercedes Maroto‐Valer, John M. Andresen, Jin Xuan. Theoretical Efficiency Limits of Photoelectrochemical CO 2 Reduction: A Route‐Dependent Thermodynamic Analysis. ChemPhysChem 2020, 21 (3) , 232-239. https://doi.org/10.1002/cphc.201901041
    20. Dowon Bae, Gerrit M. Faasse, Gerasimos Kanellos, Wilson A. Smith. Unravelling the practical solar charging performance limits of redox flow batteries based on a single photon device system. Sustainable Energy & Fuels 2019, 3 (9) , 2399-2408. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9SE00333A
    21. Jianyun Zheng, Huaijuan Zhou, Yuqin Zou, Ruilun Wang, Yanhong Lyu, San Ping Jiang, Shuangyin Wang. Efficiency and stability of narrow-gap semiconductor-based photoelectrodes. Energy & Environmental Science 2019, 12 (8) , 2345-2374. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9EE00524B
    22. Gowri M. Sriramagiri, Wesley Luc, Feng Jiao, Kathy Ayers, Kevin D. Dobson, Steven S. Hegedus. Computation and assessment of solar electrolyzer field performance: comparing coupling strategies. Sustainable Energy & Fuels 2019, 3 (2) , 422-430. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8SE00399H
    23. Matteo Bonomo, Danilo Dini, Franco Decker. Electrochemical and Photoelectrochemical Properties of Nickel Oxide (NiO) With Nanostructured Morphology for Photoconversion Applications. Frontiers in Chemistry 2018, 6 https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2018.00601
    24. Evangelos Kalamaras, M. Mercedes Maroto-Valer, Minhua Shao, Jin Xuan, Huizhi Wang. Solar carbon fuel via photoelectrochemistry. Catalysis Today 2018, 317 , 56-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2018.02.045
    25. Yanwei Lum, Joel W. Ager. Sequential catalysis controls selectivity in electrochemical CO 2 reduction on Cu. Energy & Environmental Science 2018, 11 (10) , 2935-2944. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8EE01501E
    26. Mohnish Pandey, Karsten W. Jacobsen. Promising quaternary chalcogenides as high-band-gap semiconductors for tandem photoelectrochemical water splitting devices: A computational screening approach. Physical Review Materials 2018, 2 (10) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.2.105402
    27. Yiming Song, Jun Li, Chen Wang. Modification of porphyrin/dipyridine metal complexes on the surface of TiO 2 nanotubes with enhanced photocatalytic activity for photoreduction of CO 2 into methanol. Journal of Materials Research 2018, 33 (17) , 2612-2620. https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2018.294
    28. Yun-Yun Gui, Fang-Xing Ai, Jiang-Feng Qian, Yu-Liang Cao, Guo-Ran Li, Xue-Ping Gao, Han-Xi Yang. A solar rechargeable battery based on the sodium ion storage mechanism with Fe 2 (MoO 4 ) 3 microspheres as anode materials. Journal of Materials Chemistry A 2018, 6 (23) , 10627-10631. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8TA04015J
    29. Bastian Mei, Guido Mul, Brian Seger. Beyond Water Splitting: Efficiencies of Photo‐Electrochemical Devices Producing Hydrogen and Valuable Oxidation Products. Advanced Sustainable Systems 2017, 1 (1-2) https://doi.org/10.1002/adsu.201600035
    30. Sheng Chu, Xianghua Kong, Srinivas Vanka, Hong Guo, Zetian Mi. Artificial Photosynthesis on III-Nitride Nanowire Arrays. 2017, 223-255. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.semsem.2017.02.004
    31. Korina Kuhar, Andrea Crovetto, Mohnish Pandey, Kristian S. Thygesen, Brian Seger, Peter C. K. Vesborg, Ole Hansen, Ib Chorkendorff, Karsten W. Jacobsen. Sulfide perovskites for solar energy conversion applications: computational screening and synthesis of the selected compound LaYS 3. Energy & Environmental Science 2017, 10 (12) , 2579-2593. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7EE02702H
    32. Leif Hammarström. Artificial photosynthesis: closing remarks. Faraday Discussions 2017, 198 , 549-560. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7FD00133A

    Chemistry of Materials

    Cite this: Chem. Mater. 2016, 28, 24, 8844–8850
    Click to copy citationCitation copied!
    https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b03927
    Published November 17, 2016
    Copyright © 2016 American Chemical Society

    Article Views

    2185

    Altmetric

    -

    Citations

    Learn about these metrics

    Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

    Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

    The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.