A Computational Approach for Respiratory Hazard Identification of Flavor Chemicals in Tobacco ProductsClick to copy article linkArticle link copied!
- Reema Goel*Reema Goel*Email: [email protected]. Phone: 240-402-7282.Division of Nonclinical Science, US Food and Drug Administration 11785 Beltsville Drive, Beltsville, Maryland 20705 United StatesMore by Reema Goel
- Samantha M. ReillySamantha M. ReillyDivision of Product Science, Office of Science, Center for Tobacco Products, US Food and Drug Administration 11785 Beltsville Drive, Beltsville, Maryland 20705 United StatesMore by Samantha M. Reilly
- Luis G. Valerio Jr.Luis G. Valerio, Jr.Division of Nonclinical Science, US Food and Drug Administration 11785 Beltsville Drive, Beltsville, Maryland 20705 United StatesMore by Luis G. Valerio, Jr.
Abstract
Flavor chemicals contribute to the appeal and toxicity of tobacco products, including electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS). The assortment of flavor chemicals available for use in tobacco products is extensive. In this study, a chemistry-driven computational approach was used to evaluate flavor chemicals based on intrinsic hazardous structures and reactivity of chemicals. A large library of 3012 unique flavor chemicals was compiled from publicly available information. Next, information was computed and collated based on their (1) physicochemical properties, (2) global harmonization system (GHS) health hazard classification, (3) structural alerts linked to the chemical’s reactivity, instability, or toxicity, and (4) common substructure shared with FDA’s harmful and potentially harmful constituents (HPHCs) flavor chemicals that are respiratory toxicants. Computational analysis of the constructed flavor library flagged 638 chemicals with GHS classified respiratory health hazards, 1079 chemicals with at least one structural alert, and 2297 chemicals with substructural similarity to FDA’s established and proposed list of HPHCs. A subsequent analysis was performed on a subset of 173 chemicals in the flavor library that are respiratory health hazards, contain structural alerts as well as flavor HPHC substructures. Four general toxicophore structures with an increased potential for respiratory toxicity were then identified. In summary, computational methods are efficient tools for hazard identification and understanding structure-toxicity relationship. With appropriate context of use and interpretation, in silico methods may provide scientific evidence to support toxicological evaluations of chemicals in or emitted from tobacco products.
Cited By
This article is cited by 2 publications.
- Ayomipo Adeniji, Rachel El-Hage, Marielle C. Brinkman, Ahmad El-Hellani. Nontargeted Analysis in Tobacco Research: Challenges and Opportunities. Chemical Research in Toxicology 2023, 36
(11)
, 1656-1665. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrestox.3c00150
- Catherine C. Osborn, Jessica P. Suratkal, Stephanie N. Pike Moore, Sarah Koopman Gonzalez, Kymberle L. Sterling, Amanda J. Quisenberry, Elizabeth G. Klein, Erika S. Trapl. Dissonance in Young Adult Cigarillo Users’ Categorization of Concept Flavored and Unflavored Products. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2022, 19
(12)
, 7219. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19127219
Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.
Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.
The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.