Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

You’ve supercharged your research process with ACS and Mendeley!

STEP 1:
Click to create an ACS ID

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

MENDELEY PAIRING EXPIRED
Your Mendeley pairing has expired. Please reconnect
ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
Effect of High Pressure on Nonisothermal Pyrolysis Kinetics of Oil Shale and Product Yield
My Activity

Figure 1Loading Img
    Fossil Fuels

    Effect of High Pressure on Nonisothermal Pyrolysis Kinetics of Oil Shale and Product Yield
    Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

    Other Access OptionsSupporting Information (1)

    Energy & Fuels

    Cite this: Energy Fuels 2020, 34, 12, 15855–15869
    Click to copy citationCitation copied!
    https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c02538
    Published November 18, 2020
    Copyright © 2020 American Chemical Society

    Abstract

    Click to copy section linkSection link copied!
    Abstract Image

    The current work presents a comprehensive study on nonisothermal high-pressure pyrolysis kinetics of oil shale and the influence of pressure on product yield. High-pressure thermogravimetric analyses of the oil shale samples were carried out from 30 to 900 °C, at heating rates of 5, 10, 15, and 20 °C min–1, under isobaric pressure values of 5, 10, 20, and 30 bar using a well-controlled high-pressure thermogravimetric analyzer (HP-TGA). The organic matter decomposition zone was identified from HP-TGA data and the activation energy values were determined using isoconversional methods. Under the pressurized condition, oil shale exhibited mean apparent activation energy values ranging from 341 to 451 kJ mol–1. The possible decomposition mechanisms were identified as D3 diffusion model, followed by second-order reaction model, and A3 Avrami–Erofeev nucleation model as the decomposition progressed and products formed. Further, the lab-scale pyrolysis experimental matrix was designed based on HP-TGA data, and the products obtained were characterized for compositional analysis. The percentage of permanent gases viz. hydrogen (H2), carbon dioxide (CO2), and carbon monoxide (CO) decreased dramatically with the increase of pyrolysis pressure. The derived pyrolytic oils showed a decrease in specific density (879–831 g cm–3) and carbon number (C38 to C22) with an increase in pressure. Nuclear magnetic resonance (1H NMR) analysis of the pyrolytic oil indicated a reduction in the total aromatic content (from 22 to 9 wt %) due to coking of aromatics, and a subsequent increase in the percentage of aliphatics and alkanes due to cracking of straight-chain moieties. The octane number of obtained pyrolytic oils ranged from 83 to 88. The results obtained suggest that the choice of the pressurized pyrolysis (temperature–pressure combination) system may help in controlling the product distribution and compositions.

    Copyright © 2020 American Chemical Society

    Read this article

    To access this article, please review the available access options below.

    Get instant access

    Purchase Access

    Read this article for 48 hours. Check out below using your ACS ID or as a guest.

    Recommended

    Access through Your Institution

    You may have access to this article through your institution.

    Your institution does not have access to this content. Add or change your institution or let them know you’d like them to include access.

    Supporting Information

    Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

    The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c02538.

    • TG-DTG profiles of oil shale at 10 °C min–1 for 5, 10, 20, and 30 bar pressure; distribution of activation energy values using three heating rates; Criado master plot and experimental vs theoretical f(α) plots with average R2 value graphs; constable plots; plots of pyrolysis yield; plots of NMR multiplets; tabulation of the mean relative concentration of pyrolysis gases identified by GC; and table of compounds identified by NMR analysis (PDF)

    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

    Cited By

    Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

    This article is cited by 15 publications.

    1. Chao Wang, Xiaogang Shi, Aijun Duan, Xingying Lan, Jinsen Gao, Qingang Xiong. Kinetic study of the effect of thermal hysteresis on pyrolysis of vacuum residue. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering 2024, 18 (12) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-024-2496-z
    2. Festus M. Adebiyi, Odunayo T. Ore, Oluwagbenga E. Aderibigbe. Thermogravimetric characteristics and predictive modelling of oil sand bitumen pyrolysis using artificial neural network. Discover Energy 2024, 4 (1) https://doi.org/10.1007/s43937-024-00045-5
    3. Qingmin Shi, Yaya Shi, Shuangming Wang, Bingyang Kou, Hongchao Zhao, Ruijun Ji, Xiaolong Yang, Pan Liu, Zhuangzhuang Li. Experimental study on the tar and gas distribution during tar-rich coal pyrolysis with stress loading. Fuel 2024, 376 , 132727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2024.132727
    4. Bibari Boro, Pankaj Tiwari. Effect of metals and brominated flame retardants on thermal degradation kinetics of waste printed circuit board. Thermochimica Acta 2024, 736 , 179747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tca.2024.179747
    5. Zhennan Han, Junrong Yue, Xi Zeng, Jian Yu, Fang Wang, Yu Guan, Xuejing Liu, Fu Ding, Liangliang Fu, Xin Jia, Xingfei Song, Chao Wang, Yanbin Cui, Lei Shi, Kangjun Wang, Vladimir Zivkovic, Dingrong Bai, Guangwen Xu. Major challenges and recent advances in characterizing biomass thermochemical reactions. Resources Chemicals and Materials 2024, 3 (2) , 146-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.recm.2023.10.001
    6. Xu Zhang, Wei Guo, Junfan Pan, Chaofan Zhu, Sunhua Deng. In-situ pyrolysis of oil shale in pressured semi-closed system: Insights into products characteristics and pyrolysis mechanism. Energy 2024, 286 , 129608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.129608
    7. Shuai Zhao, Jianzheng Su, Junwen Wu. Release performance and kinetic behavior of volatile products from controlled pressure pyrolysis of oil shale in nitrogen atmosphere. Scientific Reports 2023, 13 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-37459-5
    8. Priyanka Tripathi, Lakshminarayana Rao. Pyrolysis and combustion kinetics of refuse derived fuel having different plastic ratio. Bioresource Technology Reports 2023, 23 , 101559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2023.101559
    9. Bhargav Baruah, Pankaj Tiwari. Soaking and hydrous pyrolysis of Indian oil shale: Identification of produced hydrocarbons and moieties. Fuel 2022, 322 , 124255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2022.124255
    10. Bhargav Baruah, Pankaj Tiwari. Investigation of co-pyrolysis mechanism of oil shale and rubber seed shell, product yield and optimization of pyrolysis parameter using response surface methodology. Fuel 2022, 317 , 123441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2022.123441
    11. Shikha Solanki, Bhargav Baruah, Pankaj Tiwari. Modeling and simulation of wood pyrolysis process using COMSOL Multiphysics. Bioresource Technology Reports 2022, 17 , 100941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2021.100941
    12. Bhargav Baruah, Pankaj Tiwari. Compositional and kinetic study of thermal degradation of kerogen using TG‐FTIR , NMR , and microscopic study. AIChE Journal 2022, 68 (1) https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.17396
    13. Bhargav Baruah, Puja Kalita, Lalit Pandey, Pankaj Tiwari. Petroleum Reservoirs and Oil Production Mechanisms. 2022, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5465-7_1
    14. Donghao Li, Haodan Pan, Xiaojing Di, Xiaoyang Liu, Hongxiang Hu, . Progress in Catalytic Pyrolysis of Oil Shale. Scanning 2021, 2021 , 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6759176
    15. Yuandong Wu, Yuanju Li, Zhongning Zhang, Lina Sun. Effect of water pressure and expulsion on hydrocarbon generation of kerogen under semi-closed conditions. Arabian Journal of Geosciences 2021, 14 (14) https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-07724-w

    Energy & Fuels

    Cite this: Energy Fuels 2020, 34, 12, 15855–15869
    Click to copy citationCitation copied!
    https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c02538
    Published November 18, 2020
    Copyright © 2020 American Chemical Society

    Article Views

    745

    Altmetric

    -

    Citations

    Learn about these metrics

    Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

    Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

    The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.