Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

You’ve supercharged your research process with ACS and Mendeley!

STEP 1:
Click to create an ACS ID

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

MENDELEY PAIRING EXPIRED
Your Mendeley pairing has expired. Please reconnect
ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
Structure-II Clathrate Hydrates in the Daini–Atsumi Knoll of the Nankai Trough, Japan
My Activity
  • Open Access
Unconventional Energy Resources

Structure-II Clathrate Hydrates in the Daini–Atsumi Knoll of the Nankai Trough, Japan
Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

  • Yusuke Jin*
    Yusuke Jin
    Methane Hydrate Production Technology Research Group, Energy Process Research Institute, Department of Energy and Environment, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tsukisamu-Higashi, Toyohira-Ku, Sapporo 062-8517, Japan
    *Email: [email protected]
    More by Yusuke Jin
  • Jun Yoneda
    Jun Yoneda
    Methane Hydrate Production Technology Research Group, Energy Process Research Institute, Department of Energy and Environment, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tsukisamu-Higashi, Toyohira-Ku, Sapporo 062-8517, Japan
    More by Jun Yoneda
  • Kiyofumi Suzuki
    Kiyofumi Suzuki
    Methane Hydrate Development System Group, Energy Process Research Institute, Department of Energy and Environment, AIST, Onogawa, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8569, Japan
    Methane Hydrate Research and Development Group, Japan Oil, Gas and Metals National Corporation (JOGMEC), Mihama, Chiba 261-0025, Japan
  • Motoi Oshima
    Motoi Oshima
    Methane Hydrate Production Technology Research Group, Energy Process Research Institute, Department of Energy and Environment, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tsukisamu-Higashi, Toyohira-Ku, Sapporo 062-8517, Japan
    More by Motoi Oshima
  • Michihiro Muraoka
    Michihiro Muraoka
    Methane Hydrate Development System Group, Energy Process Research Institute, Department of Energy and Environment, AIST, Onogawa, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8569, Japan
  • Norio Tenma
    Norio Tenma
    Energy Process Research Institute, Department of Energy and Environment, AIST, Onogawa, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8569, Japan
    More by Norio Tenma
  • Jiro Nagao
    Jiro Nagao
    Methane Hydrate Production Technology Research Group, Energy Process Research Institute, Department of Energy and Environment, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tsukisamu-Higashi, Toyohira-Ku, Sapporo 062-8517, Japan
    More by Jiro Nagao
Open PDFSupporting Information (1)

Energy & Fuels

Cite this: Energy Fuels 2024, 38, 6, 5218–5225
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c00343
Published March 7, 2024

Copyright © 2024 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under

CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 .

Abstract

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

We examined the crystallographic properties of natural gas hydrates (GHs) in hydrate-bearing sandy sediment sampled from new wells near the second offshore gas-production wells in the Daini–Atsumi knoll region of the eastern Nankai Trough (NT) area, Japan. The sediment layers in the Daini–Astumi knoll area include a silt-dominant (thin turbidite) unit, a sand–mud alternation sequence (upper side), and a thick sandy turbidite sequence (deeper side). GHs are concentrated in the sand–mud alternation and thick sandy turbidite sequences. In the literature, all GH crystals in the eastern NT are structure I (sI) methane (CH4) hydrates. In the sand layers of the sand–mud alternation sequences, we similarly observed sI CH4 hydrate crystals, but in the thick sandy turbidite sequence, Raman spectroscopy revealed sI hydrates enclosing both CH4 and ethane (C2H6). In this sequence, we also observed the C–C vibrations of C2H6 in structure II (sII) large (51264) cages and the C–H vibrations of CH4 in sII small (512) cages. The sII hydrates enclosing CH4 and C2H6 were discovered in the deeper, thick sandy turbidite sequence near the bottom surface reflection. As the C2H6–to-CH4 composition ratio increased, the hydrate structure changed from sI to sII. Our new discovery of sII hydrates in the deeper layers of the eastern NT area is consistent with our previous study, which showed that the C2H6 composition ratio increases at deeper sampling depths.

This publication is licensed under

CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 .
  • cc licence
  • by licence
  • nc licence
  • nd licence
Copyright © 2024 American Chemical Society

Note Added After ASAP Publication

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This paper was published ASAP on March 7, 2024 with a spelling error in the title of the paper. The corrected version was reposted on March 7, 2024.

Introduction

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Gas hydrates (GHs or simply hydrates) are crystalline clathrates composed of H2O and guest gas molecules under a certain pressure–temperature condition. (1,2) The guest gas molecules are enclosed in the hydrogen-bonded framework of the hydrate structure. The crystal structures of hydrates typically exist in three forms: structure I (sI), structure II (sII), and structure H (sH), which mainly depend on the size of the guest molecules. (2) Each crystal structure is composed of two or three cage structures among the following five: dodecahedral (512, D), irregular dodecahedral (435663, ID), tetrakaidecahedral (51262, T), hexakaidecahedral (51264, H), and icosahedral (51268, I). (2) For example, sI and sII hydrate structures are composed of D and T cages and D and H cages, respectively.
In nature, GHs are found under high-pressure and low-temperature conditions and occur in the sediments of permafrost regions, seabed surfaces, and oceanic sediments. As methane (CH4) is the main guest molecule in naturally occurring GHs, natural GHs are considered as a potential new conventional energy resource in countries such as Japan, which lack abundant energy resources. Natural GHs have been confirmed in the oceanic sediments around Japan and pore-filling type GH layers for promising gas production have been found in Nankai Trough (NT). (3−5) To develop these resources, the Japanese government has launched The Research Consortium for Methane Hydrate Resources in Japan (MH21, now termed MH21-S). Thus far, MH21 has conducted two offshore tests of natural gas production from natural GH reservoirs in the Daini–Astumi knoll area of the eastern NT. The first and second tests, conducted in 2013 and 2018, respectively, showed a potential for commercial gas production. (6−8)
The knowledge obtained from natural GH sediments is crucial to understanding and modeling natural GH reservoirs. To acquire this knowledge, MH21 sampled the natural core with a pressure coring tool before the first offshore natural gas production test (2012). (9,10) The sediment layers of the Daini–Astumi knoll area include a silt-dominant (thin turbidite) unit, a sand–mud alternation sequence, and a thick sandy turbidite sequence. The GHs are concentrated in the sand–mud alternation and thick sandy turbidite sequences with approximate lengths of 28 and 32 m, respectively. (9,10) Previously, we obtained the crystallographic properties of GHs in one sand layer of the sand–mud alternation sequence in the Daini–Astumi knoll area, (11) whereas MH21 sampled the full sand–mud alternation sequence and the upper half of the thick sandy turbidite sequences during their coring campaign. Previous studies of the eastern NT (5,11,12) identified the GH crystal as sI CH4 hydrate composed of D and T cages and the enclosed guest molecules were almost exclusively CH4 (>99.99%).
In 2018, MH21 recovered natural GH-bearing sediment from new wells (AT-CW1 and −CW2) close to the second gas-production well (AT1-P3) in the Daini–Astumi knoll area of NT, Japan. (13,14) The natural GH-bearing sediment was newly recovered from almost the entire GH concentrated zone (GHCZ), that is, from the top of the sand–mud alternation sequence to near the bottom surface reflection (BSR) in the thick sandy turbidite sequences. The recovered sample length of the thick sandy turbidite sequence was 30 m longer in 2018 than in the previous coring campaign. In our previous study on the Daini–Astumi knoll area, (11) we reported that the ethane (C2H6) concentration in the gas released from sediment samples increased with depth in the thick sandy turbidite sequence, but was hardly detectable in the sand layer of the sand–mud alternation sequence. With increasing C2H6/(CH4 + C2H6) ratio (hereafter called the C2H6 ratio), the formed hydrate changed from sI CH4 hydrate to sI hydrate enclosing both CH4 and C2H6 (hereafter called the sI CH4–C2H6 hydrate). At higher C2H6 ratios, sII CH4–C2H6 hydrate composed of D and H cages was formed. (15) The C2H6 concentration is expected to further increase in the deep part of the thick sandy turbidite sequence, which was newly recovered in a recent campaign. In the present study, we report the crystal structures and guest composition of GHs sampled from AT1-CW2. Using Raman spectroscopy, we reveal the existence of two hydrates, the expected sI CH4–C2H6 hydrate and the newly discovered sII CH4–C2H6 hydrate, in the eastern NT area of Japan.

Experimental Section

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Natural Hydrate-Bearing Sediments

In 2018 (one year after the second offshore gas-production test in the NT), MH21 performed a core-sampling operation to update the geological/physical information on the Daini–Atsumi knoll region (including the production wells). (14) The sampling location is shown in Figure 1. The core sediments from the new bore hole (AT1-CW2) were recovered by deep-sea drilling vessel CHIKYU (the Japan Agency for Marine Earth Science and Technology, JAMSTEC). The AT1-CW2 is positioned 20 m west of the second gas-production well (AT1-P3). (13,14) In this coring campaign, cores were recovered from the intervals 1286.5–1343.7 and 1356.6–1362.7 mBRT (meter below the rotary table including the water depth (994.4 m) and drill floor elevation (28.5 m)) using the newly updated High Pressure Temperature Corer III (HPTC-III) The upper and deeper intervals correspond to the GHCZ (sand–mud alternation and thick sandy turbidite sequences) above and below the rapid resistivity reduction zone, respectively. The total lengths of the drilled interval and recovered pressure-core samples were 63.3 and 50.3 m (25 runs), respectively. The recovered pressure-core samples were screened by an onboard pressure-core analysis and transfer system (PCATS), chopped, and then stored in pressure chambers for laboratory analysis by onboard PCATS and pressure-core nondestructive analysis tools (PNATs) systems. (19−21) The stored pressure-core samples were transferred to AIST Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan. Before the laboratory analysis, we scanned the sediment properties using nondestructive methods (X-ray imaging, P-wave velocity, and bulk density). For the analyses, the pressure-core samples were recut under pressurized conditions in the PNATs system (19,20) in our laboratory. The study samples are given in Table 1. Their nomenclature is based on the section from which they were recovered and the number of their pressure coring run. For example, sample 01P-1b was recovered from the second subsubsection (b) of the first subsection (−1) during the first run of pressure coring (01P). AT1–CW2 composite log with coring run numbers and sample position used in this study.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Sampling locations in the Daini–Astumi knoll area of the Nankai Trough, Japan. Land maps were constructed from the ETOPO1 Global Relief Model developed by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) (16) using Generic Mapping Tools (GMT) (17,18) software.

Table 1. AT1-CW2 Natural Hydrate-Bearing Sediments in the Present Study
sampledepth (mBRT)aP-wave velocity (km·s–1)bulk density (kg·m–3)sediment section
01P-2b1287.361.71869top mud layer in sand–mud alternation sq.
02P-1b1290.332.81872sand layer in sand–mud alternation sq.
09P-3a1308.002.71781sand layer in sand–mud alternation sq.
15P-41322.002.11981thick sandy turbidite sq.
17P-1a1327.202.01954thick sandy turbidite sq.
20P-2a1335.312.72063thick sandy turbidite sq.
22P-31340.823.22005thick sandy turbidite sq.
23P-2b1342.493.51997thick sandy turbidite sq.
23P-3b1344.083.21922thick sandy turbidite sq.
24P-2b1358.592.0b2135bthick sandy turbidite sq. and above rapid resistivity reduction zone
25P-1a1360.701.6b2147bthick sandy turbidite sq. and below rapid resistivity reduction zone
a

Depth data including the water depth (994.4 m) and drill floor elevation (28.5 m).

b

Data were measured by onboard analysis in the PCATS system.

Crystallographic Analysis

The crystalline structures and gas components of the hydrates in the natural sediment were determined using powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) and Raman spectroscopy. The crystalline structures were determined from the PXRD profiles obtained by an X-ray diffractometer (SmartLab; Rigaku Co., Japan) with a Cu Kα radiation source and a high-speed one-dimensional detector (D/teX Ultra). The voltage and current of the X-ray source were 45 kV and 200 mA, respectively, and 2θ was measured over the 5–42° range with a scan step of 0.01° and a scan speed of 1.0–4.0°/min. The PXRD profiles of the samples were collected in a low-temperature chamber (83 K; TTK 450; Anton Paar GmbH, Germany).
The Raman spectra for determining the crystalline structure and gas components were collected using a Raman spectrometer (LabRAM HR-800; Horiba Ltd., Japan) with a 2400-grooves/mm grating, a thermoelectrically cooled charge-coupled device detector (2048 × 512 pixels), and a 532 nm laser source (torus 532; Laser Quantum, U.K.). The output laser power was 180 mW controlled by a power unit (mpc 3000, Laser Quantum, U.K.). The laser was reduced to 1/100 by using a neutral density filter. The Raman spectra of the samples were collected at 83 K on a low-temperature stage (HFS600E-P; Linkam Scientific Instruments, U.K.), and the Raman shifts were calibrated by using neon emission lines. In our setup, the estimated uncertainty in the calibrated Raman shift was within ±0.05 cm–1. (22) Raman exposure time and spectra accumulations were 10 s and 10–200 times, respectively. The cage occupancy ratios θTD in each sI hydrate sample were estimated from the relative peak area ratio of decomposed Raman peaks corresponding to the C–H vibration in CH4 molecules, AT/3AD. The peaks were fitted to a mixed Gaussian–Lorentzian function using the commercial multiple peak-fitting program PeakFit v4.12.

Sample Preparation for Analysis

The pressured sediment samples were first treated by CH4 purge LN2 treatment (for details, see Figure 1 in our previous paper). (19) Next, the LN2-quenched samples were broken and ground into small fragments in a liquid nitrogen atmosphere. The smallest fragments were sieved in a liquid nitrogen atmosphere and reserved for the PXRD measurements, whereas the unsieved small fragments were used in the Raman measurements.

Results and Discussion

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Figure 2 shows representative PXRD profiles of the samples. All samples presented the diffraction peaks of a typical sI hydrate structure with a cubic crystal system (space group Pm3n). In a previous semiquantitative XRD analysis, (23) the major bulk minerals in AT1-C sediments were identified as quartz, Illite-smectite, kaolinite, mica, chlorite hornblende, plagioclase, orthoclase, pyrite, and calcium carbonate (silt-dominant unit). The unit-cell dimensions of the hydrates were refined in the PXRD analysis software PDXL (Rigaku Corp.), assuming quartz, smectite, Illite-smectite, kaolinite, mica, chlorite hornblende, plagioclase, orthoclase, and pyrite particles in the sediments. Calcium carbonate was removed from the PXRD refinements because it dominates the upper muddy sediment (silt-dominant unit) of the AT1-C well. (23) The lattice constants of each sample are given in Table 2. Even if hydrate crystals existed in the 01P-2b and 25P-1a samples, a hydrate crystal volume in the PXRD analysis was unexpected as an insufficient hydrate volume was inferred from P-wave velocity data. (20,24)

Figure 2

Figure 2. Examples of PXRD profiles of measured natural hydrate samples: (a) 09P-3a; (b) 23P-3b. Red, blue, and gray lines indicate sI hydrate, ice Ih, and sediment particles, respectively. All PXRD profiles were collected at 83 K.

Table 2. Crystal Structures and Lattice Constants at 83 K (Determined by PXRD)
samplecrystal structurelattice constant in a-axis at 83 K (nm)
01P-2ba  
02P-1bsI1.18453(16)
09P-3asI1.18364(9)
15P-4sI1.18405(15)
17P-1asI1.1841(4)
20P-2asI1.18414(11)
22P-3sI1.18411(9)
23P-2bsI1.1834(2)
23P-3bsI1.18448(16)
24P-2bsI1.18528(8)
25P-1aa  
a

Crystal content (P-wave velocity) was too low to measure in the PXRD profile.

The lattice constants of the hydrates were identified from the artificial crystal surroundings and guest combinations. (25,26) The C2H6 concentration increased with increasing well depth at the AT1 site, (11) but the lattice constant of sI CH4–C2H6 hydrate was independent of CH4/C2H6 ratio. (26) The a-axis lattice constant in the artificial CH4 hydrate was 1.1857 nm at 83 K. (26,27) In our previous study, (11) the a-axis lattice constant in the sand layer of the sand–mud alternation sequence (sample AT1-C-13P) was 1.1841(2) nm, versus 1.18364(9) nm in sample 09P-3a at the equivalent horizon in the present study. Most of the samples were ca. 1.1834–1.1845 nm long along their a-axis; the exception was 24P-2b (a axis = 1.1853 nm, similar to that of artificial CH4 hydrate). The grain-size distributions of each sample are shown in Figure S2 in the Supporting Information (SI). The median (D50) sizes of the grains in each sample ranged from 10 to 165 μm. Small grains, clay (<3.9 μm) and small silts (<20 μm) were hardly seen in the 24P-2b sample. Thermodynamic conditions and interactions with the surfaces of clay minerals affect the H2O clustering/hydrate formation process. (28,29) Except for 24P-2b, the lattices of the crystal samples may have been slightly shrunken by clay mineral influences.
Figures 3 and 4 show optical observations of the hydrate crystals and the Raman spectra in each sample section, respectively. All Raman spectra show two peaks in the C–H vibration region, one at approximately 2902, and the other at approximately 2913 cm–1. Considering the PXRD results in Table 2, the peaks at 2902 and 2913 cm–1 were assigned to CH4 molecules in the T and D cages, respectively. (30) In a previous NT study, (11) the GHs in the sand layer of the sand–mud alternation sequence enclathrated only CH4 molecules. The sand–mud alternation sequences in the present study (02P-1b and 09P-3a samples) exhibited the same tendency. The cage occupancy ratios θTD, CH4 occupancies in the T and D cages were 1.21 and 1.20 in 02P-1b and 09P-3a, respectively, close to the Raman result in the previous NT study (θTD = 1.18). (11)

Figure 3

Figure 3. Examples of the observed hydrate crystals: (a) 01P-2b (a silt-dominant unit above the sand–mud alternation sq); (b) 02P-1b (sand layer in the sand–mud alternation sq); (c) 17P-1a (thick sandy turbidite sq.); (d) 22P-3 (thick sandy turbidite sq.); (e) 24P-2b (thick sandy turbidite sq. above the rapid resistivity reduction zone); (f) 25P-1a (thick sandy turbidite sq. below the rapid resistivity reduction zone). Arrows and squares indicate hydrate particles and small hydrate particles agglomerated or adjacent to each crystal, respectively. Each crystal was identified as a hydrate by a Raman measurement. Scale bars are 50 μm. Photographs were taken at 83 K under a nitrogen atmosphere.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Comparative Raman spectra of the natural hydrate samples in (a) the C–H vibration region of CH4 and (b) the C–C vibration region of C2H6. The spectra in columns (a, b) were approximately normalized by the peak intensity at 2902 cm–1 and the signal-to-noise ratio of the baseline, respectively. Each spectrum was collected at 83 K.

In the C–C vibration region of several samples (Figure 4b), we confirmed C–C vibrations at approximately 1000 cm–1, characterizing C2H6 in T cages. (15) In this study, some hydrate crystals were found in the silt-dominant unit above the sand–mud alternation sequence (Figure 3a). Sample 01P-2b was identified as an sI hydrate from the intensity ratio of the two C–H vibration peaks. In addition, the spectrum of 01P-2b presented the C–C vibration peak of C2H6 at 999.5 cm–1, suggesting C2H6 in T cages. (15) The θTD (1.14) of CH4 was lower in 01P-2b than in 02P-1b and 09P-3a, indicating that the hydrate crystals in 01P-2b were sI CH4–C2H6 hydrates. The average guest composition (mol %) of 01P-2b was roughly estimated as CH4/C2H6 = 99.5 (±0.3):0.5 (±0.3) based on the band area ratios of two C–H vibrations of CH4 and C–C vibration of C2H6. Here, band area ratio was calibrated by using the effective Raman cross-section factors of CH4 and C2H6. (31) No sI CH4–C2H6 hydrates were confirmed in the sand layer of the sand–mud alternation sequence. The source of the C2H6 molecules is unclear at present. Because the gas permeability is low in the mud layer, the guest flux from deeper regions should also be low. If the initial gas composition is C2H6/(CH4 + C2H6) > 0.001 in the 01P-2b layer (ca. 280 K), (32) it is possible to form sI CH4–C2H6 hydrates (CH4/C2H6 = 99.5:0.5) in the sea-salinity condition. The cubic crystal habit in Figure 3a may have formed over a long time by a low-mass-transfer crystal formation process.
In the upper region of the thick sandy turbidite sequence (samples 15P-4, 17P-1a, and 20P-2a), the gas hydrate crystals enclosed only CH4 molecules (no C2H6 molecules were observed). In the deeper region of the thick sandy turbidite sequence (samples 22P-3, 23P-2b, and 23P-3b), both sI CH4 and sI CH4–C2H6 hydrates were found. The previous study (11) reported that the C2H6 concentration in the sediment of the AT1-C well increased with sediment depth from 5 to 10 m below the top of the thick sandy turbidite sequence (Figure 5b). Therefore, the existence of C2H6–containing hydrate crystals in the deeper region of the thick sandy turbidite sequence is reasonable. The θTD values of sI CH4 hydrates in 15P-4, 17P-1a, 20P-2a, 22P-3, 23P-2b, and 23P-3b ranged from 1.20 to 1.31. In the C2H6–containing hydrates (22P-3, 23P-2b, and 23P-3b), the θTD values of CH4 were 1.14–1.20 (Figure 5a and Table 3). Because the C2H6 molecules of the sI CH4–C2H6 hydrates were enclosed in T cages, the θTD values of CH4 were lower in these hydrates than those in the sI CH4 hydrates. The average guest compositions (mol %) of the 22P-3, 23P-2b, and 23P-3b samples were roughly estimated as CH4/C2H6 = 99.5 (±0.3):0.5 (±0.3), 99.8 (±0.1):0.2 (±0.1), and 99.8 (±0.2):0.2 (±0.2), respectively, using Raman spectra. In the deepest sampling point of the thick sandy turbidite sequence (sample 24P-2b), all hydrate crystals were sI CH4–C2H6 hydrates with a θTD of CH4 equal to 1.18 and an estimated CH4/C2H6 of 99.7 (±0.2):0.3 (±0.2) using Raman spectra.

Figure 5

Figure 5. Depth tendencies of (a) cage occupancy ratio θTD of CH4 in sI hydrate structure in this study, and (b) methane and ethane mol % of decomposed gas determined in the 2012 coring campaign. (11) Dashed lines are rapid resistivity reduced lines. In (a), the red and blue circles indicate the θTD values of CH4 in the sI CH4 and sI CH4–C2H6 hydrates, respectively.

Table 3. Crystal Structures and Enclosed Guest Molecules, Determined from PXRD, Raman Investigations, and Guest Analysis
 C–H stretching of CH4 (cm–1)C–C stretching of C2H6 (cm–1)θTD of CH4 in sI structure
sIsIIsIsIIincluding C2H6
sample512512625125126251264noyes
01P-2b2912.92901.2 999.5  1.136
02P-1b2913.12901.2   1.212 
09P-3a2913.02901.1   1.204 
15P-42912.52900.7   1.221 
17P-1a2913.22901.4   1.215 
20P-2a2913.62901.7   1.212 
22P-32913.32901.6 1000.4 1.2041.137
23P-2b2913.72901.7 1000.1 1.2281.188
23P-3b2913.72901.8 1000.4 1.3051.199
24P-2b2913.32901.7 1000.4  1.179
25P-1a2913.32901.32912.51000.7991.01.2031.194
The 25P-1a sample was recovered below the rapid resistivity reduction zone. Resistivity is an indicator of hydrate occurrence in sediment. (33) As the hydrate content in the 25P-1a sample was extremely low (low P-wave velocity in Table 1), the rapid resistivity reduction line above this sample was assumed as the bottom of the GHCZ in the AT-1 area of the NT. In this study, hydrate crystals were found below the rapid resistivity reduction zone. Figure 3f shows examples of hydrate crystals in the 25P-1a sample. The crystals were approximately 30–70 μm in size. In the optical observations, the hydrate particles in the sand–mud alternation and thick sandy turbidite sequences showed a tendency to agglomerate (Figures 3b,c and S3 in the SI). In contrast, the particles in the 25P-1a and 01P-2b samples showed no agglomeration tendency. From the C–H vibration profile of 25P-1a (Figure 4a), the hydrate crystals in that section were identified as sI hydrates. Most of the sI hydrate crystals in the 25P-1a sample enclosed C2H6 molecules in T cages. The θTD ratios of CH4 in the sI CH4 and sI CH4–C2H6 hydrates were approximately 1.20 and 1.19, respectively. From the Ramen spectra, the CH4/C2H6 ratios of the sI CH4–C2H6 hydrates were roughly estimated as 99.8 (±0.1):0.2 (±0.1).
In the Raman spectrum of 25P-1a, we observed a slight Raman signal at approximately 991 cm–1 in some cases (Figure 4). The clear signal at 991 cm–1 was confirmed in the spectra using smoothing filters (Figure S4 in the SI). The signal at 991–992 cm–1 is attributable to C–C vibrations of C2H6 in the 51264 (H) cages of the sII hydrate structure. (30,34) Figure 6 enlarges the C–H vibration regions of the three 25P-1a samples in Figure 4a. In Figure 6a with no Raman signal at 991 cm–1, the Raman peak at 2913.4 cm–1 was fitted well to a mixed Gaussian–Lorentzian function. In contrast, the samples with a slight Raman signal at 991 cm–1 exhibited a C–H vibration band with a shoulder in the lower-wavenumber region (Figure 6b,c). The sizes of the D cages in the sI and sII hydrate structures (hereafter called sI D and sII D, respectively) were almost identical. (2) Nevertheless, the different guest compositions in the hydrate structures caused different guest–host interactions, which manifested as a Raman shift between the two guest molecules. (35) Considering the Raman signal at 991 cm–1, the C–H vibration band with a shoulder was attributed to sII hydrate in the 25P-1a section. To our knowledge, we provide the first spectroscopic evidence of sII hydrate in the NT area.

Figure 6

Figure 6. Enlargements of the Raman spectra (Figure 4a) of the three 25P-1a samples, focusing on the peaks in the C–H vibration region of CH4. The higher-wavenumber peaks in two 25P-1a samples were fitted to a mixed Gaussian–Lorentzian function (dashed lines) using the commercial multiple peak-fitting program PeakFit v4.12.

In the peak-fitting analysis, the Raman bands with a shoulder decomposed into two peaks: a low-intensity peak at 2912.5–2912.7 cm–1 and a high-intensity peak at 2913.3–2913.5 cm–1. In general, the C–H vibration signal of sII D appeared at lower wavenumbers than that of sI D. (15,35,36) The C–H vibration in the H cage of the sII structure is expected to shift to a lower Raman region (around 2901 cm–1), (30,35) but no band shoulder appeared around 2901 cm–1 in the C–H vibration region of sII. Assuming that the peaks at 2901 cm–1 and the higher-intensity peak (2913.3–2913.5 cm–1) arose from CH4 in T and the sI D cages of the sI hydrate structure, respectively, θTD of CH4 was calculated as 1.36. Conversely, if the lower-intensity peak (2912.5–2912.7 cm–1) was contributed by the sI D cage, the θTD of CH4 would be 11.0. As mentioned above, the sI CH4–C2H6 hydrate in 25P-1a presented a high CH4 content (99.8 mol %), implying that the CH4 content in the sII CH4–C2H6 hydrate was also high. Consequently, the higher-intensity peak at 2913.3 and 2913.5 cm–1 hydrate can be attributed to C–H vibrations of the sI D cage. In the sII hydrate structure, the ratio of D to H cages was D/H = 2, versus D/T = 1:3 in the sI hydrate structure. Because the C–H vibrations of the sII D cage presented as low-intensity signals, no C–H vibration band with a shoulder related to H cages was considered to appear around 2901 cm–1. From the peak area ratio of sI D and sII D C–H vibration bands in Figure 6b,c, an sII hydrate composition ratio was considered as about 1.5–3%.
In the 25P-1a section, sII CH4–C2H6 hydrates coexisted with sI CH4–C2H6 hydrates. sII CH4–C2H6 hydrates stably form in a certain range of C2H6 concentrations; for example, initial fluid composition C2H6/(CH4 + C2H6) > 0.02 at approximately 14 MPa and 288 K in the sea-salinity condition. (32) The existence of sII CH4–C2H6 hydrate would be reasonable considering our previous study, which showed that the C2H6 composition ratio increases at deeper sampling depths in the NT area. (11) In sediment, the pressure condition induced by a sea-level change decreases by 0.1 MPa per 10 m depth. From continuous records of the sea-level changes, (37) the sea level is known to have lowered 12 000 years ago and has since risen. (38) sII CH4–C2H6 hydrates have more stable crystal phases than sI CH4 hydrate. (2) If the sea level lowers, the stability zone of the sI CH4 hydrate is narrowed and uplifted; consequently, the sI CH4 hydrates dissociate in the bottom region. The zone above the rapid resistivity reduction is maintained under hydrate-stable pressure–temperature conditions over the long term, regardless of sea-level change. The several sea-level changes might have dissociated the sI CH4 hydrates and more stable sII hydrates enclosing C2H6 might have remained in the non-GHCZ region.

Conclusions

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

We analyzed natural GHs recovered from the Daini–Atsumi knoll region of the eastern Nankai Trough (NT) area of Japan, where two offshore gas-production tests were performed. In PXRD and Ramen analyses, most of the GHs presented an sI hydrate crystal structure with a cubic crystal system. The lattice constant of the sI hydrate was determined as a = 1.184 nm. In the 24P-2b sample from the deeper thick sandy turbidite section, the lattice constant was a = 1.185 nm, similar to that of the artificial sI CH4 hydrate. The lattice constants of natural GHs can differ by clay mineral influences; unlike the other samples, the 24P-2b sample presented very few small grains, clay (<3.9 μm) and small silt (<20 μm). In our previous study, the C2H6 composition ratio increased with the sampling depth. Here, we detected not only sI CH4 hydrates but also sI CH4–C2H6 hydrates in the Raman spectra (C–H vibrations of CH4 and C–C vibration of C2H6) at depths below 1340 m. In sample 25P-1a (from the deepest sampling zone of the thick sandy turbidite sequence near the BSR), we observed the first signs of sII hydrates enclosing CH4 and C2H6 in the eastern NT area. The 25P-1a section is below the rapid resistivity reduction line, where there is no GHCZ. The sII CH4–C2H6 hydrates are more stable than the sI CH4 hydrate. The records of several sea-level changes in the area suggest that sI CH4 hydrates dissociated and that sII hydrates remained stable in the hydrate nonconcentrated zone.

Supporting Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c00343.

  • AT1-CW2 composite log data; grain-size distribution of natural sediment used in this study; example of agglomerated hydrate particles in the 22P-3 section; and peak finding by using smoothing filers (PDF)

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

  • Corresponding Author
    • Yusuke Jin - Methane Hydrate Production Technology Research Group, Energy Process Research Institute, Department of Energy and Environment, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tsukisamu-Higashi, Toyohira-Ku, Sapporo 062-8517, JapanOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6256-7278 Email: [email protected]
  • Authors
    • Jun Yoneda - Methane Hydrate Production Technology Research Group, Energy Process Research Institute, Department of Energy and Environment, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tsukisamu-Higashi, Toyohira-Ku, Sapporo 062-8517, JapanOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-4569-9922
    • Kiyofumi Suzuki - Methane Hydrate Development System Group, Energy Process Research Institute, Department of Energy and Environment, AIST, Onogawa, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8569, JapanMethane Hydrate Research and Development Group, Japan Oil, Gas and Metals National Corporation (JOGMEC), Mihama, Chiba 261-0025, Japan
    • Motoi Oshima - Methane Hydrate Production Technology Research Group, Energy Process Research Institute, Department of Energy and Environment, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tsukisamu-Higashi, Toyohira-Ku, Sapporo 062-8517, JapanOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5305-4828
    • Michihiro Muraoka - Methane Hydrate Development System Group, Energy Process Research Institute, Department of Energy and Environment, AIST, Onogawa, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8569, JapanOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2397-9835
    • Norio Tenma - Energy Process Research Institute, Department of Energy and Environment, AIST, Onogawa, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8569, Japan
    • Jiro Nagao - Methane Hydrate Production Technology Research Group, Energy Process Research Institute, Department of Energy and Environment, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tsukisamu-Higashi, Toyohira-Ku, Sapporo 062-8517, Japan
  • Notes
    The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgments

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This study was supported by funding from the Research Consortium for Methane Hydrate Resources in Japan (MH21 Research Consortium, now MH21-S), planned by the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI), Japan. The authors thank Dr. H. Haneda, Dr. H. Minagawa, Dr. M. Morita, K. Shinjo, T. Uchiumi, T. Yamada of AIST, and Dr. K. Yamamoto, Dr. Y. Nakatsuka, Dr. T. Aung, and Dr T. Imai of JOGMEC for coring operations and experimental supports. They also express gratitude to all members of the shipboard team of the coring cruise in 2018.

References

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article references 38 other publications.

  1. 1
    Franks, F. Water: A Comprehensive Treatise.; Plenum Press: London, 1973; Vol. 2.
  2. 2
    Sloan, E. D.; Koh, C. A. Clathrate Hydrates of Natural Gasses., 3rd ed.; CRC Press, 2007.
  3. 3
    Ashi, J.; Tokuyama, H.; Taira, A. Distribution of methane hydrate BSRs and its implication for the prism growth in the Nankai Trough. Mar. Geol. 2002, 187, 177191,  DOI: 10.1016/S0025-3227(02)00265-7
  4. 4
    Colwell, F.; Matsumoto, R.; Reed, D. A review of the gas hydrates, geology, and biology of the Nankai Trough. Chem. Geol. 2004, 205, 391404,  DOI: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2003.12.023
  5. 5
    Kida, M.; Suzuki, K.; Kawamura, T.; Oyama, H.; Nagao, J.; Ebinuma, T.; Narita, H.; Suzuki, H.; Sakagami, H.; Takahashi, N. Characteristics of Natural Gas Hydrates Occurring in Pore-Spaces of Marine Sediments Collected from the Eastern Nankai Trough, off Japan. Energy Fuels 2009, 23, 55805586,  DOI: 10.1021/ef900612f
  6. 6
    Japan Oil, Gas, and Metals National Corporation (JOGMEC) Gas Produced from Methane Hydrate. http://www.jogmec.go.jp/english/news/release/content/300101080.pdf.
  7. 7
    Konno, Y.; Fujii, T.; Sato, A.; Akamine, K.; Naiki, M.; Masuda, Y.; Yamamoto, K.; Nagao, J. Key Findings of the World’s First Offshore Methane Hydrate Production Test off the Coast of Japan: Toward Future Commercial Production. Energy Fuels 2017, 31, 26072616,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b03143
  8. 8
    Japan Oil, Gas, and Metals National Corporation (JOGMEC) 2nd Gas Produced from Methane Hydrate (in Japanese). http://www.jogmec.go.jp/news/release/content/300335291.pdf.
  9. 9
    Fujii, T.; Suzuki, K.; Takayama, T.; Tamaki, M.; Komatsu, Y.; Konno, Y.; Yoneda, J.; Yamamoto, K.; Nagao, J. Geological setting and characterization of a methane hydrate reservoir distributed at the first offshore production test site on the Daini-Atsumi Knoll in the eastern Nankai Trough, Japan. Mar. Pet. Geol. 2015, 66, 310322,  DOI: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2015.02.037
  10. 10
    Suzuki, K.; Schultheiss, P.; Nakatsuka, Y.; Ito, T.; Egawa, K.; Holland, M.; Yamamoto, K. Physical properties and sedimentological features of hydrate-bearing samples recovered from the first gas hydrate production test site on Daini-Atsumi Knoll around eastern Nankai Trough. Mar. Pet. Geol. 2015, 66, 346357,  DOI: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2015.02.025
  11. 11
    Kida, M.; Jin, Y.; Watanabe, M.; Konno, Y.; Yoneda, J.; Egawa, K.; Ito, T.; Nakatsuka, Y.; Suzuki, K.; Fujii, T.; Nagao, J. Chemical and crystallographic characterizations of natural gas hydrates recovered from a production test site in the eastern Nankai Trough. Mar. Pet. Geol. 2015, 66, 396403,  DOI: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2015.02.019
  12. 12
    Ijiri, A.; Inagaki, F.; Kubo, Y.; Adhikari, R. R.; Hattori, S.; Hoshino, T.; Imachi, H.; Kawagucci, S.; Morono, Y.; Ohtomo, Y. Deep-biosphere methane production stimulated by geofluids in the Nankai accretionary complex. Sci. Adv. 2018, 4, eaao4631  DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aao4631
  13. 13
    Yamamoto, K.; Wang, X. X.; Tamaki, M.; Suzuki, K. The second offshore production of methane hydrate in the Nankai Trough and gas production behavior from a heterogeneous methane hydrate reservoir. Rsc Adv. 2019, 9, 2598726013,  DOI: 10.1039/C9RA00755E
  14. 14
    Yamamoto, K.; Suzuki, K.; Wang, X.; Matsunaga, T.; Nishioka, I.; Nakatsuka, Y.; Yoneda, J. The Second Offsure Production Test of Methane Hydrates in the Earstern Nankai Trough and Site Characterization Efforts. Fire Ice 2019, 915
  15. 15
    Subramanian, S.; Kini, R. A.; Dec, S. F.; Sloan, E. D. Evidence of structure II hydrate formation from methane + ethane mixtures. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2000, 55, 19811999,  DOI: 10.1016/S0009-2509(99)00389-9
  16. 16
    Amante, C.; Eakins, B. W. ETOPO1 1 Arc-Minute Global Relief Model: Procedures, Data Sources and Analysis. (accessed August 8, 2017).
  17. 17
    Wessel, P.; Smith, W. H. F.; Scharroo, R.; Luis, J.; Wobbe, F. Generic Mapping Tools: Improved Version Released. Eos, Trans. Am. Geophys. Union 2013, 94, 409410,  DOI: 10.1002/2013EO450001
  18. 18
    Wessel, P.; Smith, W. H. F. Free software helps map and display data. Eos, Trans. Am. Geophys. Union 1991, 72, 441446,  DOI: 10.1029/90EO00319
  19. 19
    Yoneda, J.; Masui, A.; Konno, Y.; Jin, Y.; Egawa, K.; Kida, M.; Ito, T.; Nagao, J.; Tenma, N. Mechanical properties of hydrate-bearing turbidite reservoir in the first gas production test site of the Eastern Nankai Trough. Mar. Pet. Geol. 2015, 66, 471486,  DOI: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2015.02.029
  20. 20
    Jin, Y.; Konno, Y.; Yoneda, J.; Kida, M.; Nagao, J. In Situ Methane Hydrate Morphology Investigation: Natural Gas Hydrate-Bearing Sediment Recovered from the Eastern Nankai Trough Area. Energy Fuels 2016, 30, 55475554,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b00762
  21. 21
    Schultheiss, P.; Holland, M.; Roberts, J.; Durce, M.; Fox, P. In PCATS: Pressure Core Analysis and Transfer System ; 7th International Conference on Gas Hydrates (ICGH2011), 2011.
  22. 22
    Jin, Y.; Kida, M.; Nagao, J. Structure H Clathrate Hydrates in Methane-Halogenic Large Molecule Substance-Water Systems. J. Phys. Chem. C 2019, 123, 1717017175,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b04691
  23. 23
    Egawa, K.; Nishimura, O.; Izumi, S.; Fukami, E.; Jin, Y.; Kida, M.; Konno, Y.; Yoneda, J.; Ito, T.; Suzuki, K. Bulk sediment mineralogy of gas hydrate reservoir at the East Nankai offshore production test site. Mar. Pet. Geol. 2015, 66, 379387,  DOI: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2015.02.039
  24. 24
    Konno, Y.; Jin, Y.; Yoneda, J.; Kida, M.; Egawa, K.; Ito, T.; Suzuki, K.; Nagao, J. Effect of methane hydrate morphology on compressional wave velocity of sandy sediments: Analysis of pressure cores obtained in the Eastern Nankai Trough. Mar. Pet. Geol. 2015, 66, 425433,  DOI: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2015.02.021
  25. 25
    Takeya, S.; Fujihisa, H.; Gotoh, Y.; Istomin, V.; Chuvilin, E.; Sakagami, H.; Hachikubo, A. Methane Clathrate Hydrates Formed within Hydrophilic and Hydrophobic Media: Kinetics of Dissociation and Distortion of Host Structure. J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 117, 70817085,  DOI: 10.1021/jp312297h
  26. 26
    Takeya, S.; Uchida, T.; Kamata, Y.; Nagao, J.; Kida, M.; Minami, H.; Sakagami, H.; Hachikubo, A.; Takahashi, N.; Shoji, H. Lattice expansion of clathrate hydrates of methane mixtures and natural gas. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 69286931,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.200501845
  27. 27
    Shpakov, V. P.; Tse, J. S.; Tulk, C. A.; Kvamme, B.; Belosludov, V. R. Elastic moduli calculation and instability in structure I methane clathrate hydrate. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1998, 282, 107114,  DOI: 10.1016/S0009-2614(97)01241-4
  28. 28
    Yan, K. F.; Li, X. S.; Xu, C. G.; Lv, Q. N.; Ruan, X. K. Molecular dynamics simulation of the intercalation behaviors of methane hydrate in montmorillonite. J. Mol. Model. 2014, 20, 2311  DOI: 10.1007/s00894-014-2311-8
  29. 29
    Li, Y.; Chen, M.; Song, H. Z.; Yuan, P.; Zhang, B. F.; Liu, D.; Zhou, H. J.; Bu, H. L. Effect of Cations (Na+, K+, and Ca2+) on Methane Hydrate Formation on the External Surface of Montmorillonite: Insights from Molecular Dynamics Simulation. ACS Earth Space Chem. 2020, 4, 572582,  DOI: 10.1021/acsearthspacechem.9b00323
  30. 30
    Subramanian, S.; Sloan, E. D. Trends in Vibrational Frequencies of Guests Trapped in Clathrate Hydrate Cages. J. Phys. Chem. B 2002, 106, 43484355,  DOI: 10.1021/jp013644h
  31. 31
    Burke, E. A. J. Raman microspectrometry of fluid inclusions. Lithos 2001, 55, 139158,  DOI: 10.1016/S0024-4937(00)00043-8
  32. 32
    The Colorado School of Mines Hydrate Prediction Program ″CSMGem″. 2007.
  33. 33
    Collett, T. S. A Review of Well-Log Analysis Techniques Used to Assess Gas-Hydrate-Bearing Reservoirs. In Natural Gas Hydrates: Occurrence, Distribution, and Detection: Occurrence, Distribution, and Detection; Paull, C. K.; Dillon, W. P., Eds.; American Geophysical Union, 2001; Vol. 124, pp 189210.
  34. 34
    Ohno, H.; Strobel, T. A.; Dec, S. F.; Sloan, E. D.; Koh, C. A. Raman Studies of Methane-Ethane Hydrate Metastability. J. Phys. Chem. A 2009, 113, 17111716,  DOI: 10.1021/jp8010603
  35. 35
    Ohno, H.; Kida, M.; Sakurai, T.; Iizuka, Y.; Hondoh, T.; Narita, H.; Nagao, J. Symmetric Stretching Vibration of CH4 in Clathrate Hydrate Structures. ChemPhysChem 2010, 11, 30703073,  DOI: 10.1002/cphc.201000519
  36. 36
    Sum, A. K.; Burruss, R. C.; Sloan, E. D. Measurement of Clathrate Hydrates via Raman Spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. B 1997, 101, 73717377,  DOI: 10.1021/jp970768e
  37. 37
    Cutler, K. B.; Edwards, R. L.; Taylor, F. W.; Cheng, H.; Adkins, J.; Gallup, C. D.; Cutler, P. M.; Burr, G. S.; Bloom, A. L. Rapid sea-level fall and deep-ocean temperature change since the last interglacial period. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2003, 206, 253271,  DOI: 10.1016/S0012-821X(02)01107-X
  38. 38
    Fleming, K.; Johnston, P.; Zwartz, D.; Yokoyama, Y.; Lambeck, K.; Chappell, J. Refining the eustatic sea-level curve since the Last Glacial Maximum using far- and intermediate-field sites. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 1998, 163, 327342,  DOI: 10.1016/S0012-821X(98)00198-8

Cited By

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article has not yet been cited by other publications.

Open PDF

Energy & Fuels

Cite this: Energy Fuels 2024, 38, 6, 5218–5225
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c00343
Published March 7, 2024

Copyright © 2024 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under

CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 .

Article Views

405

Altmetric

-

Citations

-
Learn about these metrics

Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.

  • Abstract

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. Sampling locations in the Daini–Astumi knoll area of the Nankai Trough, Japan. Land maps were constructed from the ETOPO1 Global Relief Model developed by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) (16) using Generic Mapping Tools (GMT) (17,18) software.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. Examples of PXRD profiles of measured natural hydrate samples: (a) 09P-3a; (b) 23P-3b. Red, blue, and gray lines indicate sI hydrate, ice Ih, and sediment particles, respectively. All PXRD profiles were collected at 83 K.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. Examples of the observed hydrate crystals: (a) 01P-2b (a silt-dominant unit above the sand–mud alternation sq); (b) 02P-1b (sand layer in the sand–mud alternation sq); (c) 17P-1a (thick sandy turbidite sq.); (d) 22P-3 (thick sandy turbidite sq.); (e) 24P-2b (thick sandy turbidite sq. above the rapid resistivity reduction zone); (f) 25P-1a (thick sandy turbidite sq. below the rapid resistivity reduction zone). Arrows and squares indicate hydrate particles and small hydrate particles agglomerated or adjacent to each crystal, respectively. Each crystal was identified as a hydrate by a Raman measurement. Scale bars are 50 μm. Photographs were taken at 83 K under a nitrogen atmosphere.

    Figure 4

    Figure 4. Comparative Raman spectra of the natural hydrate samples in (a) the C–H vibration region of CH4 and (b) the C–C vibration region of C2H6. The spectra in columns (a, b) were approximately normalized by the peak intensity at 2902 cm–1 and the signal-to-noise ratio of the baseline, respectively. Each spectrum was collected at 83 K.

    Figure 5

    Figure 5. Depth tendencies of (a) cage occupancy ratio θTD of CH4 in sI hydrate structure in this study, and (b) methane and ethane mol % of decomposed gas determined in the 2012 coring campaign. (11) Dashed lines are rapid resistivity reduced lines. In (a), the red and blue circles indicate the θTD values of CH4 in the sI CH4 and sI CH4–C2H6 hydrates, respectively.

    Figure 6

    Figure 6. Enlargements of the Raman spectra (Figure 4a) of the three 25P-1a samples, focusing on the peaks in the C–H vibration region of CH4. The higher-wavenumber peaks in two 25P-1a samples were fitted to a mixed Gaussian–Lorentzian function (dashed lines) using the commercial multiple peak-fitting program PeakFit v4.12.

  • References


    This article references 38 other publications.

    1. 1
      Franks, F. Water: A Comprehensive Treatise.; Plenum Press: London, 1973; Vol. 2.
    2. 2
      Sloan, E. D.; Koh, C. A. Clathrate Hydrates of Natural Gasses., 3rd ed.; CRC Press, 2007.
    3. 3
      Ashi, J.; Tokuyama, H.; Taira, A. Distribution of methane hydrate BSRs and its implication for the prism growth in the Nankai Trough. Mar. Geol. 2002, 187, 177191,  DOI: 10.1016/S0025-3227(02)00265-7
    4. 4
      Colwell, F.; Matsumoto, R.; Reed, D. A review of the gas hydrates, geology, and biology of the Nankai Trough. Chem. Geol. 2004, 205, 391404,  DOI: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2003.12.023
    5. 5
      Kida, M.; Suzuki, K.; Kawamura, T.; Oyama, H.; Nagao, J.; Ebinuma, T.; Narita, H.; Suzuki, H.; Sakagami, H.; Takahashi, N. Characteristics of Natural Gas Hydrates Occurring in Pore-Spaces of Marine Sediments Collected from the Eastern Nankai Trough, off Japan. Energy Fuels 2009, 23, 55805586,  DOI: 10.1021/ef900612f
    6. 6
      Japan Oil, Gas, and Metals National Corporation (JOGMEC) Gas Produced from Methane Hydrate. http://www.jogmec.go.jp/english/news/release/content/300101080.pdf.
    7. 7
      Konno, Y.; Fujii, T.; Sato, A.; Akamine, K.; Naiki, M.; Masuda, Y.; Yamamoto, K.; Nagao, J. Key Findings of the World’s First Offshore Methane Hydrate Production Test off the Coast of Japan: Toward Future Commercial Production. Energy Fuels 2017, 31, 26072616,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b03143
    8. 8
      Japan Oil, Gas, and Metals National Corporation (JOGMEC) 2nd Gas Produced from Methane Hydrate (in Japanese). http://www.jogmec.go.jp/news/release/content/300335291.pdf.
    9. 9
      Fujii, T.; Suzuki, K.; Takayama, T.; Tamaki, M.; Komatsu, Y.; Konno, Y.; Yoneda, J.; Yamamoto, K.; Nagao, J. Geological setting and characterization of a methane hydrate reservoir distributed at the first offshore production test site on the Daini-Atsumi Knoll in the eastern Nankai Trough, Japan. Mar. Pet. Geol. 2015, 66, 310322,  DOI: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2015.02.037
    10. 10
      Suzuki, K.; Schultheiss, P.; Nakatsuka, Y.; Ito, T.; Egawa, K.; Holland, M.; Yamamoto, K. Physical properties and sedimentological features of hydrate-bearing samples recovered from the first gas hydrate production test site on Daini-Atsumi Knoll around eastern Nankai Trough. Mar. Pet. Geol. 2015, 66, 346357,  DOI: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2015.02.025
    11. 11
      Kida, M.; Jin, Y.; Watanabe, M.; Konno, Y.; Yoneda, J.; Egawa, K.; Ito, T.; Nakatsuka, Y.; Suzuki, K.; Fujii, T.; Nagao, J. Chemical and crystallographic characterizations of natural gas hydrates recovered from a production test site in the eastern Nankai Trough. Mar. Pet. Geol. 2015, 66, 396403,  DOI: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2015.02.019
    12. 12
      Ijiri, A.; Inagaki, F.; Kubo, Y.; Adhikari, R. R.; Hattori, S.; Hoshino, T.; Imachi, H.; Kawagucci, S.; Morono, Y.; Ohtomo, Y. Deep-biosphere methane production stimulated by geofluids in the Nankai accretionary complex. Sci. Adv. 2018, 4, eaao4631  DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aao4631
    13. 13
      Yamamoto, K.; Wang, X. X.; Tamaki, M.; Suzuki, K. The second offshore production of methane hydrate in the Nankai Trough and gas production behavior from a heterogeneous methane hydrate reservoir. Rsc Adv. 2019, 9, 2598726013,  DOI: 10.1039/C9RA00755E
    14. 14
      Yamamoto, K.; Suzuki, K.; Wang, X.; Matsunaga, T.; Nishioka, I.; Nakatsuka, Y.; Yoneda, J. The Second Offsure Production Test of Methane Hydrates in the Earstern Nankai Trough and Site Characterization Efforts. Fire Ice 2019, 915
    15. 15
      Subramanian, S.; Kini, R. A.; Dec, S. F.; Sloan, E. D. Evidence of structure II hydrate formation from methane + ethane mixtures. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2000, 55, 19811999,  DOI: 10.1016/S0009-2509(99)00389-9
    16. 16
      Amante, C.; Eakins, B. W. ETOPO1 1 Arc-Minute Global Relief Model: Procedures, Data Sources and Analysis. (accessed August 8, 2017).
    17. 17
      Wessel, P.; Smith, W. H. F.; Scharroo, R.; Luis, J.; Wobbe, F. Generic Mapping Tools: Improved Version Released. Eos, Trans. Am. Geophys. Union 2013, 94, 409410,  DOI: 10.1002/2013EO450001
    18. 18
      Wessel, P.; Smith, W. H. F. Free software helps map and display data. Eos, Trans. Am. Geophys. Union 1991, 72, 441446,  DOI: 10.1029/90EO00319
    19. 19
      Yoneda, J.; Masui, A.; Konno, Y.; Jin, Y.; Egawa, K.; Kida, M.; Ito, T.; Nagao, J.; Tenma, N. Mechanical properties of hydrate-bearing turbidite reservoir in the first gas production test site of the Eastern Nankai Trough. Mar. Pet. Geol. 2015, 66, 471486,  DOI: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2015.02.029
    20. 20
      Jin, Y.; Konno, Y.; Yoneda, J.; Kida, M.; Nagao, J. In Situ Methane Hydrate Morphology Investigation: Natural Gas Hydrate-Bearing Sediment Recovered from the Eastern Nankai Trough Area. Energy Fuels 2016, 30, 55475554,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b00762
    21. 21
      Schultheiss, P.; Holland, M.; Roberts, J.; Durce, M.; Fox, P. In PCATS: Pressure Core Analysis and Transfer System ; 7th International Conference on Gas Hydrates (ICGH2011), 2011.
    22. 22
      Jin, Y.; Kida, M.; Nagao, J. Structure H Clathrate Hydrates in Methane-Halogenic Large Molecule Substance-Water Systems. J. Phys. Chem. C 2019, 123, 1717017175,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b04691
    23. 23
      Egawa, K.; Nishimura, O.; Izumi, S.; Fukami, E.; Jin, Y.; Kida, M.; Konno, Y.; Yoneda, J.; Ito, T.; Suzuki, K. Bulk sediment mineralogy of gas hydrate reservoir at the East Nankai offshore production test site. Mar. Pet. Geol. 2015, 66, 379387,  DOI: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2015.02.039
    24. 24
      Konno, Y.; Jin, Y.; Yoneda, J.; Kida, M.; Egawa, K.; Ito, T.; Suzuki, K.; Nagao, J. Effect of methane hydrate morphology on compressional wave velocity of sandy sediments: Analysis of pressure cores obtained in the Eastern Nankai Trough. Mar. Pet. Geol. 2015, 66, 425433,  DOI: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2015.02.021
    25. 25
      Takeya, S.; Fujihisa, H.; Gotoh, Y.; Istomin, V.; Chuvilin, E.; Sakagami, H.; Hachikubo, A. Methane Clathrate Hydrates Formed within Hydrophilic and Hydrophobic Media: Kinetics of Dissociation and Distortion of Host Structure. J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 117, 70817085,  DOI: 10.1021/jp312297h
    26. 26
      Takeya, S.; Uchida, T.; Kamata, Y.; Nagao, J.; Kida, M.; Minami, H.; Sakagami, H.; Hachikubo, A.; Takahashi, N.; Shoji, H. Lattice expansion of clathrate hydrates of methane mixtures and natural gas. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 69286931,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.200501845
    27. 27
      Shpakov, V. P.; Tse, J. S.; Tulk, C. A.; Kvamme, B.; Belosludov, V. R. Elastic moduli calculation and instability in structure I methane clathrate hydrate. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1998, 282, 107114,  DOI: 10.1016/S0009-2614(97)01241-4
    28. 28
      Yan, K. F.; Li, X. S.; Xu, C. G.; Lv, Q. N.; Ruan, X. K. Molecular dynamics simulation of the intercalation behaviors of methane hydrate in montmorillonite. J. Mol. Model. 2014, 20, 2311  DOI: 10.1007/s00894-014-2311-8
    29. 29
      Li, Y.; Chen, M.; Song, H. Z.; Yuan, P.; Zhang, B. F.; Liu, D.; Zhou, H. J.; Bu, H. L. Effect of Cations (Na+, K+, and Ca2+) on Methane Hydrate Formation on the External Surface of Montmorillonite: Insights from Molecular Dynamics Simulation. ACS Earth Space Chem. 2020, 4, 572582,  DOI: 10.1021/acsearthspacechem.9b00323
    30. 30
      Subramanian, S.; Sloan, E. D. Trends in Vibrational Frequencies of Guests Trapped in Clathrate Hydrate Cages. J. Phys. Chem. B 2002, 106, 43484355,  DOI: 10.1021/jp013644h
    31. 31
      Burke, E. A. J. Raman microspectrometry of fluid inclusions. Lithos 2001, 55, 139158,  DOI: 10.1016/S0024-4937(00)00043-8
    32. 32
      The Colorado School of Mines Hydrate Prediction Program ″CSMGem″. 2007.
    33. 33
      Collett, T. S. A Review of Well-Log Analysis Techniques Used to Assess Gas-Hydrate-Bearing Reservoirs. In Natural Gas Hydrates: Occurrence, Distribution, and Detection: Occurrence, Distribution, and Detection; Paull, C. K.; Dillon, W. P., Eds.; American Geophysical Union, 2001; Vol. 124, pp 189210.
    34. 34
      Ohno, H.; Strobel, T. A.; Dec, S. F.; Sloan, E. D.; Koh, C. A. Raman Studies of Methane-Ethane Hydrate Metastability. J. Phys. Chem. A 2009, 113, 17111716,  DOI: 10.1021/jp8010603
    35. 35
      Ohno, H.; Kida, M.; Sakurai, T.; Iizuka, Y.; Hondoh, T.; Narita, H.; Nagao, J. Symmetric Stretching Vibration of CH4 in Clathrate Hydrate Structures. ChemPhysChem 2010, 11, 30703073,  DOI: 10.1002/cphc.201000519
    36. 36
      Sum, A. K.; Burruss, R. C.; Sloan, E. D. Measurement of Clathrate Hydrates via Raman Spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. B 1997, 101, 73717377,  DOI: 10.1021/jp970768e
    37. 37
      Cutler, K. B.; Edwards, R. L.; Taylor, F. W.; Cheng, H.; Adkins, J.; Gallup, C. D.; Cutler, P. M.; Burr, G. S.; Bloom, A. L. Rapid sea-level fall and deep-ocean temperature change since the last interglacial period. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2003, 206, 253271,  DOI: 10.1016/S0012-821X(02)01107-X
    38. 38
      Fleming, K.; Johnston, P.; Zwartz, D.; Yokoyama, Y.; Lambeck, K.; Chappell, J. Refining the eustatic sea-level curve since the Last Glacial Maximum using far- and intermediate-field sites. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 1998, 163, 327342,  DOI: 10.1016/S0012-821X(98)00198-8
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information


    The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c00343.

    • AT1-CW2 composite log data; grain-size distribution of natural sediment used in this study; example of agglomerated hydrate particles in the 22P-3 section; and peak finding by using smoothing filers (PDF)


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.