ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
Optimization Effects of Ionic Solutions on Coal Fracturing Using High-Voltage Electric Pulse
My Activity
    Unconventional Energy Resources

    Optimization Effects of Ionic Solutions on Coal Fracturing Using High-Voltage Electric Pulse
    Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

    • Changbao Jiang
      Changbao Jiang
      State Key Laboratory of Coal Mine Disaster Dynamics and Control, School of Resources and Safety Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400030, China
      Institute of Disaster Rock Mechanics, Liaoning University, Shenyang 110036, China
    • Chunyao Huang
      Chunyao Huang
      State Key Laboratory of Coal Mine Disaster Dynamics and Control, School of Resources and Safety Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400030, China
    • Jiayao Wu*
      Jiayao Wu
      State Key Laboratory of Coal Mine Disaster Dynamics and Control, School of Resources and Safety Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400030, China
      *Email: [email protected]
      More by Jiayao Wu
    • Deyong Wang
      Deyong Wang
      Xinwen Mining Group (Yili) Energy Development Co, Ltd, No. 1 mine, Yili 835000, China
      More by Deyong Wang
    • Baisheng Nie
      Baisheng Nie
      State Key Laboratory of Coal Mine Disaster Dynamics and Control, School of Resources and Safety Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400030, China
      More by Baisheng Nie
    • Aiwen Wang
      Aiwen Wang
      Institute of Disaster Rock Mechanics, Liaoning University, Shenyang 110036, China
      More by Aiwen Wang
    • Yiran Zhu*
      Yiran Zhu
      School of Mechanical and Mining Engineering, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia
      *Email: [email protected]
      More by Yiran Zhu
    Other Access Options

    Energy & Fuels

    Cite this: Energy Fuels 2025, 39, 7, 3528–3539
    Click to copy citationCitation copied!
    https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c06076
    Published February 10, 2025
    Copyright © 2025 American Chemical Society

    Abstract

    Click to copy section linkSection link copied!
    Abstract Image

    High-voltage electric pulse (HVEP) technology holds significant potential in enhancing the permeability for coalbed methane extraction, and the introduction of ionic solutions greatly amplifies its fracturing effectiveness. To elucidate the optimization effects of different ionic solutions in HVEP technology, this study systematically compared the improvement in coal samples conductivity after treatment with KCl, MgCl2, and FeCl3 solutions. Physical experiments on HVEP-induced coal fracturing were conducted to reveal the evolution of pore and fracture structures in coal and the associated permeability changes. The results demonstrate that: (1) ionic solution soaking significantly improves the conductivity of coal samples, reduces the difficulty of electrical breakdown, and enhances energy utilization efficiency. The improvement effects vary among solutions, with FeCl3 showing the best performance for XT anthracite and MgCl2 being more effective for SSP bituminous coal. (2) Compared to distilled water, ionic solution-treated coal samples exhibit significantly increased porosity and average pore size after breakdown, with an enhanced internal fracture network. The number of macropores and mesopores increases, while micropores and nanopores decrease, resulting in improved pore-throat connectivity. (3) In terms of permeability enhancement, the effects of the three ionic solutions surpass those of distilled water. Consistent with the conductivity improvement trend, FeCl3 and MgCl2 solutions demonstrated optimal permeability enhancement for XT and SSP coal samples, respectively. Therefore, when combining ionic solution treatment with HVEP technology for coal seam fracturing and permeability enhancement, it is crucial to consider the specific characteristics of the coal to select the most suitable ionic solution and achieve higher efficiency in permeability improvement.

    Copyright © 2025 American Chemical Society

    Read this article

    To access this article, please review the available access options below.

    Get instant access

    Purchase Access

    Read this article for 48 hours. Check out below using your ACS ID or as a guest.

    Recommended

    Access through Your Institution

    You may have access to this article through your institution.

    Your institution does not have access to this content. Add or change your institution or let them know you’d like them to include access.

    Cited By

    Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

    This article has not yet been cited by other publications.

    Energy & Fuels

    Cite this: Energy Fuels 2025, 39, 7, 3528–3539
    Click to copy citationCitation copied!
    https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c06076
    Published February 10, 2025
    Copyright © 2025 American Chemical Society

    Article Views

    83

    Altmetric

    -

    Citations

    -
    Learn about these metrics

    Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

    Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

    The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.