ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
Economic Dependence and Vulnerability of United States Agricultural Sector on Insect-Mediated Pollination Service
My Activity

Figure 1Loading Img
    Anthropogenic Impacts on the Atmosphere

    Economic Dependence and Vulnerability of United States Agricultural Sector on Insect-Mediated Pollination Service
    Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

    • Alex Jordan
      Alex Jordan
      Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, United States
      More by Alex Jordan
    • Harland M. Patch
      Harland M. Patch
      Department of Entomology, Center for Pollinator Research, Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, United States
    • Christina M. Grozinger
      Christina M. Grozinger
      Department of Entomology, Center for Pollinator Research, Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, United States
    • Vikas Khanna*
      Vikas Khanna
      Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, United States
      Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, United States
      *Email: [email protected]
      More by Vikas Khanna
    Other Access OptionsSupporting Information (2)

    Environmental Science & Technology

    Cite this: Environ. Sci. Technol. 2021, 55, 4, 2243–2253
    Click to copy citationCitation copied!
    https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c04786
    Published January 26, 2021
    Copyright © 2021 American Chemical Society

    Abstract

    Click to copy section linkSection link copied!
    Abstract Image

    Deficits in insect-mediated pollination service undermine ecosystem biodiversity and function, human nutrition, and economic welfare. Global pollinator supply continues to decline, while production of pollination-dependent crops increases. Using publicly available price and production data and existing pollination field studies, we quantify economic dependence of United States crops on insect-mediated pollination service at the county level and update existing coefficients of insect dependence of sample crops when possible. Economic value dependent on pollination service totals 34.0 billion USD in 2012. Twenty percent of US counties produce 80% of total economic value attributable to insect pollinators. We compile county-level data and consider the spatial relationship between economic value dependent on insect-mediated pollination, region-specific forage suitability, and crop-specific agricultural areas within US landscapes. We identify vulnerable, highly dependent areas where habitat for wild pollinators has been reduced. These results can help inform future efforts to conserve and bolster managed and wild pollinator populations to ensure sustainable production of key agricultural crops.

    Copyright © 2021 American Chemical Society

    Read this article

    To access this article, please review the available access options below.

    Get instant access

    Purchase Access

    Read this article for 48 hours. Check out below using your ACS ID or as a guest.

    Recommended

    Access through Your Institution

    You may have access to this article through your institution.

    Your institution does not have access to this content. Add or change your institution or let them know you’d like them to include access.

    Supporting Information

    Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

    The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.0c04786.

    • Crop selection, dependence coefficients, pollination value, spatial analysis, economic details, and bee abundance (PDF)

    • Relative wild bee abundance given by the model developed by Lonsdorf et al, 2015 for each pixel of the contiguous US averaged for each county (XLSX)

    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

    Cited By

    Click to copy section linkSection link copied!
    Citation Statements
    Explore this article's citation statements on scite.ai

    This article is cited by 63 publications.

    1. Frank B Green, Eric M Peterson, Amanda D Emert, Seenivasan Subbiah, Philip N Smith. Bee Pollinator Mortality Due to Pesticide-Laden Particulate Matter from Beef Cattle Feedyards. Environmental Science & Technology 2023, 57 (40) , 14839-14848. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c03135
    2. Michelle L. Hladik, Johanna M. Kraus, Cassandra D. Smith, Mark Vandever, Dana W. Kolpin, Carrie E. Givens, Kelly L. Smalling. Wild Bee Exposure to Pesticides in Conservation Grasslands Increases along an Agricultural Gradient: A Tale of Two Sample Types. Environmental Science & Technology 2023, 57 (1) , 321-330. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c07195
    3. Yumeng Li, Long Chen, Sai Liang, Haifeng Zhou, Yu-Rong Liu, Huan Zhong, Zhifeng Yang. Looping Mercury Cycle in Global Environmental–Economic System Modeling. Environmental Science & Technology 2022, 56 (5) , 2861-2879. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c03936
    4. Pedro J. Bergamo, Marina Wolowski, Leandro R. Tambosi, Edenise Garcia, Kayna Agostini, Lucas A. Garibaldi, Tiffany M. Knight, Eimear Nic Lughadha, Paulo E. A. M. Oliveira, Marcia C. M. Marques, Pietro K. Maruyama, Márcia M. Maués, Alberto K. Oppata, André R. Rech, Antônio M. Saraiva, Felipe D. S. Silva, Gizele Sousa, Rodrigo Y. Tsukahara, Isabela G. Varassin, Blandina F. Viana, Leandro Freitas. Areas Requiring Restoration Efforts are a Complementary Opportunity to Support the Demand for Pollination Services in Brazil. Environmental Science & Technology 2021, 55 (17) , 12043-12053. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c02546
    5. Lily Houtman, Anthony C. Robinson, Dave McLaughlin, Christina M. Grozinger. Evaluating the usability and utility of a spatial decision support system for pollinator ecology. Ecological Informatics 2025, 89 , 103182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2025.103182
    6. Stephanie R. Rogers, Bethany G. Foust, Jake R. Nelson. Standard use of Geographic Information System (GIS) techniques in honey bee research 2.0. Journal of Apicultural Research 2025, 64 (2) , 443-532. https://doi.org/10.1080/00218839.2024.2357977
    7. Nathan Derstine, Cameron Murray, Freddy S. Purnell, Etya Amsalem. Sublethal pesticide exposure decreases mating and disrupts chemical signaling in a beneficial pollinator. Science of The Total Environment 2025, 970 , 179005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.179005
    8. Esmaeil Amiri, Hossam Abou-Shaara, Alison McAfee. The effect of major abiotic stressors on honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) queens and potential impact on their progeny. Apidologie 2025, 56 (1) https://doi.org/10.1007/s13592-024-01133-0
    9. Paschal H Mbazi, Cosmas J. Emily, Pantaleo K.T. Munishi. Pollination efficiency of apis mellifera and hypotrigona gribodoi on capsicum annuum fruit set and yield. International Journal of Tropical Insect Science 2025, 45 (1) , 277-287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42690-025-01427-5
    10. Z. M. Al Dhafar, M. A. Abdel Razik, M. A. Osman, M. E. Sweelam. Toxicity and biochemical effects of four pesticides on honey bee, Apis mellifera under laboratory conditions. Brazilian Journal of Biology 2025, 85 https://doi.org/10.1590/1519-6984.290561
    11. Audra L. Hinson, Greg McCarty, Ling Du, Christopher Sichko, Karen Maguire. Native bee Pollination Ecosystem Services in Agricultural Wetlands and Riparian Protected Lands. Wetlands 2024, 44 (8) https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-024-01872-x
    12. Gabriela M. Quinlan, Jeffrey W. Doser, Melanie A. Kammerer, Christina M. Grozinger. Estimating genus-specific effects of non-native honey bees and urbanization on wild bee communities: A case study in Maryland, United States. Science of The Total Environment 2024, 953 , 175783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.175783
    13. Carrie Eberle, Drew A. Scott, Frank Forcella, Russ W. Gesch, Sharon Weyers, Jane M. F. Johnson, Sharon Schneider. Planting date impact on flowering, pollinator visitation and yield of mass flowering oilseed crops in the Northern Corn Belt. Agricultural and Forest Entomology 2024, 26 (4) , 534-545. https://doi.org/10.1111/afe.12644
    14. Terese Maxine P. Cruz, Stephen L. Buchmann, Kathleen L. Prudic. Buzzing towards Resilience: Investigating the Spatial Alignment of the Desert Pallid Bee, Centris pallida, and Its Host Plants in Response to Climate Change. Insects 2024, 15 (10) , 793. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15100793
    15. Phillip deMaynadier, Matthew D. Schlesinger, Spencer P. Hardy, Kent P. McFarland, Laura Saucier, Erin L. White, Tracy A. Zarrillo, Bruce E. Young. Insect pollinators: The time is now for identifying species of greatest conservation need. Wildlife Society Bulletin 2024, 48 (3) https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.1537
    16. Décio Luiz Gazzoni, João Vitor Ganem Rillo Paz Barateiro, Pedro da Rosa Santos. Supplemental bee pollination effect on the productivity of soybean grown in a low yield potential condition. Journal of Apicultural Research 2024, 63 (4) , 788-800. https://doi.org/10.1080/00218839.2022.2047264
    17. Bayram Alparslan, Hüseyin Taşlı, Cengiz Erkan. Effective control of Varroa destructor mites with Juniperus excelsa, Juglans regia, Origanum onites, and Mentha spicata leaf extracts: a study of honey bee colonies. Journal of Apicultural Research 2024, 142 , 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/00218839.2024.2378240
    18. Briana E. Wham, Elyse C. McCormick, Casey M. Carr, Nicole R. Bracci, Ashley C. Heimann, Timothy J. Egner, M. Jesse Schneider, Heather M. Hines. Comparison of seasonal viral prevalence supports honey bees as potential spring pathogen reservoirs for bumble bees. Ecosphere 2024, 15 (6) https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.4883
    19. Nicole E. Miller-Struttmann. Climate change predicted to exacerbate declines in bee populations. Nature 2024, 628 (8007) , 270-271. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-024-00681-w
    20. Melanie R. Kazenel, Karen W. Wright, Terry Griswold, Kenneth D. Whitney, Jennifer A. Rudgers. Heat and desiccation tolerances predict bee abundance under climate change. Nature 2024, 628 (8007) , 342-348. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07241-2
    21. Pablo Andrés Grimaldi, Ana Haydee Ladio, Carolina Laura Morales. Contribution of pollinators to production and reproduction of neglected and underutilized food species in family farming systems in Patagonia. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 2024, 48 (3) , 357-381. https://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2023.2295862
    22. Erin O. Campbell, Kanishka Senevirathna, Boyd A. Mori. Incorporating Population Genomics into Integrated Insect Pest Management: A Reduced-Representation Sequencing Approach. 2024https://doi.org/10.1007/13836_2024_110
    23. Erwan Saouter, Thomas Gibon. A World Full of Energy. 2024, 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-51332-9_1
    24. Eric V. Lonsdorf, Maj Rundlöf, Charlie C. Nicholson, Neal M. Williams. A spatially explicit model of landscape pesticide exposure to bees: Development, exploration, and evaluation. Science of The Total Environment 2024, 908 , 168146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168146
    25. Frank B. Green, Sonia R. Muñoz, Philip N. Smith. Laboratory Determination of Particulate-Matter–Bound Agrochemical Toxicity among Honeybees, Mason Bees, and Painted Lady Butterflies. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 2023, 42 (12) , 2642-2650. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5730
    26. Rogan Tokach, Autumn Smart, Judy Wu-Smart. Re-using food resources from failed honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) colonies and their impact on colony queen rearing capacity. Scientific Reports 2023, 13 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-44037-2
    27. Christopher Michael Menzel. Fruit set is moderately dependent on insect pollinators in strawberry and is limited by the availability of pollen under natural open conditions. The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology 2023, 98 (6) , 685-714. https://doi.org/10.1080/14620316.2023.2212670
    28. Zhongqiang Zhao, Ruifeng Shan, Xiaoyin Sun, Jiayao Sun, Bingyu Wang, Zhi Wang. Mapping and assessing supply and demand of crop pollination services in Shandong Province, China. Journal of Cleaner Production 2023, 426 , 139024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139024
    29. Aphrodite Kantsa, Consuelo M. De Moraes, Mark C. Mescher. Global change and plant–pollinator communities in Mediterranean biomes. Global Ecology and Biogeography 2023, 32 (11) , 1893-1913. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.13753
    30. Kelly Kulhanek, Brandon K. Hopkins, Walter S. Sheppard. Comparison of oxalic acid drip and HopGuard for pre-winter Varroa destructor control in honey bee ( Apis mellifera ) colonies. Journal of Apicultural Research 2023, 62 (5) , 992-998. https://doi.org/10.1080/00218839.2022.2061325
    31. Axel Brockmann. How India Changed My Ideas About Honey Bees. Journal of the Indian Institute of Science 2023, 103 (4) , 981-995. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41745-023-00412-6
    32. Joshua H. Kestel, Philip W. Bateman, David L. Field, Nicole E. White, Rose Lines, Paul Nevill. eDNA metabarcoding of avocado flowers: ‘Hass’ it got potential to survey arthropods in food production systems?. Molecular Ecology Resources 2023, 23 (7) , 1540-1555. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.13814
    33. Georgia Cullen, Joshua B Gilligan, Joseph G Guhlin, Peter K Dearden, . Germline progenitors and oocyte production in the honeybee queen ovary. GENETICS 2023, 225 (1) https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/iyad138
    34. Pedro J. Bergamo, Kátia F. Rito, Blandina F. Viana, Edenise Garcia, Eimear Nic Lughadha, Márcia M. Maués, André R. Rech, Felipe D.S. Silva, Isabela G. Varassin, Kayna Agostini, Marcia C.M. Marques, Pietro K. Maruyama, Nirvia Ravena, Lucas A. Garibaldi, Tiffany M. Knight, Paulo E.A. M. Oliveira, Alberto K. Oppata, Antônio M. Saraiva, Leandro R. Tambosi, Rodrigo Y. Tsukahara, Leandro Freitas, Marina Wolowski. Integrating public engagement to intensify pollination services through ecological restoration. iScience 2023, 26 (8) , 107276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2023.107276
    35. Elzbieta Iwaszkiewicz-Eggebrecht, Piotr Łukasik, Mateusz Buczek, Junchen Deng, Emily A. Hartop, Harald Havnås, Monika Prus-Frankowska, Carina R. Ugarph, Paulina Viteri, Anders F. Andersson, Tomas Roslin, Ayco J. M. Tack, Fredrik Ronquist, Andreia Miraldo, . FAVIS: Fast and versatile protocol for non-destructive metabarcoding of bulk insect samples. PLOS ONE 2023, 18 (7) , e0286272. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0286272
    36. Elzbieta Iwaszkiewicz‐Eggebrecht, Emma Granqvist, Mateusz Buczek, Monika Prus, Jan Kudlicka, Tomas Roslin, Ayco J. M. Tack, Anders F. Andersson, Andreia Miraldo, Fredrik Ronquist, Piotr Łukasik. Optimizing insect metabarcoding using replicated mock communities. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 2023, 14 (4) , 1130-1146. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.14073
    37. Shannon M. Cruz, Christina M. Grozinger. Mapping student understanding of bees: Implications for pollinator conservation. Conservation Science and Practice 2023, 5 (3) https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.12902
    38. Sai Liang, Qiumeng Zhong. Reducing environmental impacts through socioeconomic transitions: critical review and prospects. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering 2023, 17 (2) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-023-1624-1
    39. Giulia Capotorti, Simone Valeri, Arianna Giannini, Valerio Minorenti, Mariagrazia Piarulli, Paolo Audisio. On the Role of Natural and Induced Landscape Heterogeneity for the Support of Pollinators: A Green Infrastructure Perspective Applied in a Peri-Urban System. Land 2023, 12 (2) , 387. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12020387
    40. A-Tai Truong, Mi-Sun Yoo, Soo Kyoung Seo, Tae Jun Hwang, Soon-Seek Yoon, Yun Sang Cho. Prevalence of honey bee pathogens and parasites in South Korea: A five-year surveillance study from 2017 to 2021. Heliyon 2023, 9 (2) , e13494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13494
    41. Alex Jordan, Mason Unger, Vikas Khanna. The Significance of Insect Pollinators: Opportunities and Challenges. 2023, 107-134. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35692-6_6
    42. Deysi Muñoz-Galicia, Carlos Lara, Citlalli Castillo-Guevara, Mariana Cuautle, Claudia Rodríguez-Flores. Impacts of land use change on native plant-butterfly interaction networks from central Mexico. PeerJ 2023, 11 , e16205. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.16205
    43. Katherine Lunn, Tobias Frøslev, Madeleine Rhodes, Leah Taylor, Hernani F. M. Oliveira, Catherine E. A. Gresty, Elizabeth L. Clare. Non-target effects of agri-environmental schemes on solitary bees and fungi in the United Kingdom. Bulletin of Entomological Research 2022, 112 (6) , 734-744. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007485322000414
    44. Margaret R. Douglas, Paige Baisley, Sara Soba, Melanie Kammerer, Eric V. Lonsdorf, Christina M. Grozinger. Putting pesticides on the map for pollinator research and conservation. Scientific Data 2022, 9 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01584-z
    45. Kelsey K. Graham, Meghan O. Milbrath, Yajun Zhang, Nicolas Baert, Scott McArt, Rufus Isaacs. Pesticide risk to managed bees during blueberry pollination is primarily driven by off-farm exposures. Scientific Reports 2022, 12 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-11156-1
    46. Alison McAfee, Judy Li, Marianne Otte. Honey Bee Genome Editing. 2022, 359-374. https://doi.org/10.1079/9781800621176.0018
    47. Lisa W. DeVetter, Stan Chabert, Meghan O. Milbrath, Rachel E. Mallinger, Jenna Walters, Rufus Isaacs, Suzette P. Galinato, Clark Kogan, Kayla Brouwer, Andony Melathopoulos, Maxime Eeraerts. Toward evidence-based decision support systems to optimize pollination and yields in highbush blueberry. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems 2022, 6 https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2022.1006201
    48. Franziska Dickel, Nick Maria Peter Bos, Huw Hughes, Raquel Martín-Hernández, Mariano Higes, Annette Kleiser, Dalial Freitak. The oral vaccination with Paenibacillus larvae bacterin can decrease susceptibility to American Foulbrood infection in honey bees—A safety and efficacy study. Frontiers in Veterinary Science 2022, 9 https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.946237
    49. Kathleen L. Prudic, Terese Maxine P. Cruz, Jazmyn I. B. Winzer, Jeffrey C. Oliver, Natalie A. Melkonoff, Hank Verbais, Andrew Hogan. Botanical Gardens Are Local Hotspots for Urban Butterflies in Arid Environments. Insects 2022, 13 (10) , 865. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13100865
    50. Kristina Garber, Gloria DeGrandi-Hoffman, Robert Curry, Jeffrey M. Minucci, Daniel E. Dawson, Cameron Douglass, Joseph P. Milone, S. Thomas Purucker. Simulating the Effects of Pesticides on Honey Bee (Apis mellifera L.) Colonies with BeePop+. Ecologies 2022, 3 (3) , 275-291. https://doi.org/10.3390/ecologies3030022
    51. Gyan P. Harwood, Vincent Prayugo, Adam G. Dolezal. Butenolide Insecticide Flupyradifurone Affects Honey Bee Worker Antiviral Immunity and Survival. Frontiers in Insect Science 2022, 2 https://doi.org/10.3389/finsc.2022.907555
    52. Clint R.V. Otto, Haochi Zheng, Torre Hovick, Max Post van der Burg, Benjamin Geaumont. Grassland conservation supports migratory birds and produces economic benefits for the commercial beekeeping industry in the U.S. Great Plains. Ecological Economics 2022, 197 , 107450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107450
    53. Hong Zhang, Chao Han, Tom D. Breeze, Mengdan Li, Shibonage K. Mashilingi, Jun Hua, Wenbin Zhang, Xuebin Zhang, Shiwen Zhang, Jiandong An. Bumblebee Pollination Enhances Yield and Flavor of Tomato in Gobi Desert Greenhouses. Agriculture 2022, 12 (6) , 795. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12060795
    54. Jose Marcelino, Charles Braese, Krisztina Christmon, Jay D. Evans, Todd Gilligan, Tugrul Giray, Anthony Nearman, Elina L. Niño, Robyn Rose, Walter S. Sheppard, Dennis vanEngelsdorp, James D. Ellis. The Movement of Western Honey Bees (Apis mellifera L.) Among U.S. States and Territories: History, Benefits, Risks, and Mitigation Strategies. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 2022, 10 https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2022.850600
    55. Makaylee K. Crone, David J. Biddinger, Christina M. Grozinger. Wild Bee Nutritional Ecology: Integrative Strategies to Assess Foraging Preferences and Nutritional Requirements. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems 2022, 6 https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2022.847003
    56. Frank T. Farruggia, Kristina Garber, Christine Hartless, Kristin Jones, Lee Kyle, Nicholas Mastrota, Joseph P. Milone, Sujatha Sankula, Keith Sappington, Katherine Stebbins, Thomas Steeger, Holly Summers, Pamela G. Thompson, Michael Wagman, . A retrospective analysis of honey bee (Apis mellifera) pesticide toxicity data. PLOS ONE 2022, 17 (4) , e0265962. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265962
    57. Dawn L. Boncristiani, James P. Tauber, Evan C. Palmer-Young, Lianfei Cao, William Collins, Kyle Grubbs, Jillian A. Lopez, Lyndel W. Meinhardt, Vy Nguyen, Sungtaek Oh, Raymond J. Peterson, Halondra Zamora, Yanping Chen, Jay D. Evans. Impacts of Diverse Natural Products on Honey Bee Viral Loads and Health. Applied Sciences 2021, 11 (22) , 10732. https://doi.org/10.3390/app112210732
    58. Jian Duan, Yong X. U., Haining Jiang, . Trade vulnerability assessment in the grain-importing countries: A case study of China. PLOS ONE 2021, 16 (10) , e0257987. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257987
    59. Kathy Baylis, Elinor M. Lichtenberg, Erik Lichtenberg. Economics of Pollination. Annual Review of Resource Economics 2021, 13 (1) , 335-354. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-101420-110406
    60. Jon Zawislak, Gus Lorenz, John Adamczyk, Robert Wiedenmann, Neelendra K. Joshi. Proportion of commodity crop pollens and pesticide contamination in honey bee diets in two different landscapes. Environmental Advances 2021, 5 , 100116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envadv.2021.100116
    61. Anthony C. Robinson, Jamie L. Peeler, Tim Prestby, Sarah C. Goslee, Kate Anton, Christina M. Grozinger. Beescape: Characterizing user needs for environmental decision support in beekeeping. Ecological Informatics 2021, 64 , 101366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2021.101366
    62. Codey L. Mathis, Darin J. McNeil, Monica R. Lee, Christina M. Grozinger, David I. King, Clint R.V. Otto, Jeffery L. Larkin. Pollinator communities vary with vegetation structure and time since management within regenerating timber harvests of the Central Appalachian Mountains. Forest Ecology and Management 2021, 496 , 119373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119373
    63. Kirsten S. Traynor, Dennis vanEngelsdorp, Zachary S. Lamas. Social disruption: Sublethal pesticides in pollen lead to Apis mellifera queen events and brood loss. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 2021, 214 , 112105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112105

    Environmental Science & Technology

    Cite this: Environ. Sci. Technol. 2021, 55, 4, 2243–2253
    Click to copy citationCitation copied!
    https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c04786
    Published January 26, 2021
    Copyright © 2021 American Chemical Society

    Article Views

    3992

    Altmetric

    -

    Citations

    Learn about these metrics

    Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

    Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

    The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.