ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
My Activity
CONTENT TYPES

Figure 1Loading Img

COVID-19 Disruption Demonstrates Win-Win Climate Solutions for Major League Sports

Cite this: Environ. Sci. Technol. 2021, 55, 23, 15609–15615
Publication Date (Web):November 15, 2021
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c03422
Copyright © 2021 American Chemical Society
  • Free to Read

Article Views

4139

Altmetric

-

Citations

LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICS
PDF (5 MB)
Supporting Info (2)»

Abstract

Unlike other greenhouse gas sources associated with professional sports, team air travel is highly visible, under direct league control, and extremely difficult to decarbonize with technological advancement alone. In an analysis of air travel emissions from the four largest North American sports leagues, I estimate that teams traveled a combined 7.5 million kilometers in 2018, generating nearly 122 000 tonnes of carbon dioxide emissions. But the 2020 season saw major declines in travel as teams and leagues adjusted for the pandemic. Scheduling changes with cobenefits for player health and performance were central to this strategy including increased sorting of schedules by region and more consecutive repeated games (“baseball-style” series). If the scheduling changes implemented in 2020 were maintained in future years, air travel emissions reductions of 22% each year could be expected. Additional reductions in air travel emissions could also be achieved by using more fuel-efficient aircraft and shortened regular seasons.

This publication is licensed for personal use by The American Chemical Society.

Synopsis

Maintaining policies implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic would greatly reduce greenhouse gas emissions from major league air travel.

1. Introduction

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

By interrupting routine business practices, the COVID-19 pandemic has allowed companies and employees to evaluate which customs are constructive or necessary and which are dispensable. During the pandemic, many companies reduced their climate impact by replacing office labor with remote work and long-distance business travel with videoconferencing. But virtual solutions are not feasible in some industries, such as major league sports, where teams must be physically present in stadiums around the world.
While some transport emissions can be decarbonized through technological change alone, poor rail networks, and low population densities prevent sports teams in North America from using decarbonized, overland travel. In the near-term, climate solutions are unlikely to come from the aviation industry itself which has demonstrated inadequate governance (1) in an already hard to decarbonize sector. (2) Prospects for technological solutions are weak: electric aircraft are expected to only be available for short flights (3) while the most promising path to decarbonization, nonbiogenic synthetic fuels, will not eliminate non-CO2 warming (4) and may compete for resources with other sectors. (5) For these reasons and others, (6) achieving international climate goals will require less air travel. (7)
Less air travel is desirable as a climate solution, but would leagues be better off focusing their mitigation efforts elsewhere? In 2016, 28% of all emissions tracked by the National Hockey League (including Scope 1, 2, and 3) were attributable to business air travel (8) with a majority of all emissions attributable to purchased electricity. (9) While technically not under their purview, leagues could also attempt to track and incentivize reductions in fan travel. However, unlike air travel, there are readily available technologies for decarbonizing energy grids and personal vehicles. 20% of teams in the four major leagues are based in jurisdictions with plans to ban new sales of internal combustion vehicles by 2035 (California and Canada) (10,11) while 32% of teams are in a jurisdiction with clean/renewable energy targets of 90–100% for 2030–2045. (12,13) Regulations governing aviation emissions in these same regions are much weaker; states are not permitted to set their own aircraft emissions standards, yet the Environmental Protection Agency’s own standard for new aircraft (set for 2028) is not expected to reduce emissions. (14) Looking at future scenarios, in the IEA’s optimistic “net zero 2050” scenario, 75% of new vehicles in advanced economies are electric in 2030 and electricity grids in those nations decarbonize by 2035, but even by 2050, only 75% of aviation fuels could be expected to come from kerosene alternatives. (15) There is every indication that technological and policy change will abate emissions from stadiums and personal vehicles while the fraction of emissions from air travel grows for the foreseeable future.
As high-profile businesses with employees who act as defacto role models, (16) there is an opportunity for professional sports teams and leagues to lead by example in reducing their air travel and thereby the most visible and intractable emissions in their industry. In recent years, leagues and teams commonly participated in social justice causes (17) including the provision of arenas as polling places for the 2020 United States election. (18) Meanwhile environmental efforts have been limited and instead luxury emissions are often promoted. (19−21) But climate-driven natural disasters (22,23) have begun to affect both leagues and individual athletes, (24,25) incentivizing a shift from the status quo. Fortunately, a range of win-win solutions can reduce emissions from major league sports travel.
Here, I analyze emissions from team air travel during 2018 and 2020 in the National Basketball Association (NBA), National Hockey League (NHL), Major League Baseball (MLB), and the National Football League (NFL), demonstrating the extent to which policies enacted during the COVID-19 pandemic could be maintained to permanently cut air travel emissions in this industry.

2. Methods and Data

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

League schedules were taken from a variety of online sources. Relevant information (such as location of a preseason game) was occasionally unavailable, in which case information was obtained on an ad hoc basis (e.g., online video highlights of the game in question). A full list of scheduling sources is available in the Supporting Information (SI) Text. For the 2020 schedule, a number of games were canceled or rescheduled. I relied on the original schedule since the purpose of analyzing the 2020 schedule is not to determine emissions in that year but to ascertain what could realistically be achieved through policy changes. For this reason, and due to some shortened seasons in 2020, the emissions in 2020 were calculated on a per game basis. Additionally, only the first half of the 2020 NBA schedule was included since the second half of the schedule was not available at the time of analysis. Similarly, only the regular season was analyzed for 2020 (only a small portion of emissions are attributable to the preseason and playoffs for each league).
As a simplifying assumption, I ignored air travel to All Star games, assuming that individual players traveled to their homes, the game, and the subsequent game by commercial carriers. Similarly, I assumed players took commercial flights to their first preseason/spring-training game but returned to the home team’s city at the end of the season. I also excluded player movement from in-season trades. For the MLB and NHL, all split-squad Away games during Spring Training in 2018 were assumed to be played by the franchise’s “B-team” without a charter aircraft and were excluded from the away team’s itinerary. For the NFL, I assumed that each away game was followed by a return flight to the home team’s city due to the larger gaps between NFL games.
For each game, I found major airports near the origin and destination stadium and determined flight distance based on the coordinates of the two airports. The distance of each journey was estimated using a great circle distance calculation with a correction factor recommended by the International Civil Aviation Organization to account for additional travel due to traffic, weather corrections, and so forth. (26) Distance was then converted into a quantity of CO2 emissions using a carbon calculator coded in R (Version 4.0.2). Fuel burn rates were taken from the International Civil Aviation Organization carbon calculator methodology which provides rates for various aircraft flown at discrete distances. (26) Because only certain data points are provided (e.g., fuel burn at 125, 250, 500 nautical miles, etc.), I fit the points with a quartic function (increased emissions for takeoff and landing create a nonlinear relationship). This allows for interpolation of fuel burn at any given distance. Since 3.16 kg of CO2 are produced for every kg of jet fuel that is burned, the mass of fuel was then multiplied by the constant 3.16 to find the mass of carbon dioxide released. (26) Note that values provided only include carbon dioxide emissions, not carbon dioxide equivalents: the warming caused by league air travel would be about twice as large due to the radiative forcing of non-CO2 emissions from the aircraft. (27,28) To find the climate warming (or carbon dioxide equivalents) associated, interested readers can multiply the CO2 emissions by two to find the Global Warming Potential of those emissions. (28)
Where specific information on a team’s aircraft was available, I made use of that and otherwise made the conservative assumption of a 737 (a commonly used charter aircraft on the lower end of emissions intensity for chartered jets). The carbon calculator assumes that all flights beyond an aircraft’s maximum range (e.g., rare international flights for exhibition games) are taken on a larger 767 aircraft. I assumed that all trips are direct flights, except for the few cases where a flight is outside the range of a 767, where I instead assumed two equidistant legs in the 767 (see SI Table S3 for full list of teams and corresponding aircraft). Flights that are shorter than 200km (e.g., Philadelphia to New York), are assumed to be taken over ground and are not counted toward the emissions total. Emissions are only calculated for those trips assumed to be on charter or private jets: emissions from transport to the airport, hotel stays, stadium attendance and so forth are beyond the scope of the paper. For values from individual trips see SI Dataset S1.
To provide an upper estimate of emissions reductions for the various policies (Table 2), I selected the league where the policy best applied. For regionalized schedules, both the NHL and MLB took significant steps in grouping teams during the 2020 season, however, the NHL’s schedule was not optimized for emissions reductions because it grouped all Canadian teams together (despite the large distances separating them). I therefore examine the MLB as a case of maximum efficacy. For consecutive repeated games (“baseball-style" series), the NHL was chosen for having the largest increase in consecutive repeats. The NFL was chosen for canceling overseas games because the largest fraction of its emissions were derived from trips overseas. The NBA was chosen as the case for shortening of the regular season schedule since the policy has actually been considered by the NBA. (29)
To calculate the emissions associated with adding consecutive repeated games in the NHL, I determined the quantity of emissions that would have been produced in 2018 if the number of games and the emissions per trip remained the same, but the number of trips per game during the regular season took on the value from the 2020 regular season (about 0.9 trips per game) instead of the 2018 regular season (about 1.4 trips per game). By preserving the 2018 term for emissions per trip this calculation retains the influence of high emissions trips that took place in 2018 due to the lower levels of geographic sorting and the presence of longer overseas flights. This ensures that the estimate for the efficacy of consecutive repeated games only reflects changes from that policy.
Similarly, to calculate the emissions saved from increased geographic sorting, I took the number of games and the number of trips per game from 2018 but multiplied them by the emissions per trip during the 2020 regular season (15.1 tCO2) as opposed to the 2018 regular season (19.2 tCO2). The MLB had no games coded as “overseas” in 2018 but did have one series played in Puerto Rico and another in Mexico. The effect on the results is negligible (emissions per trip drop by 0.4% when removing these trips from the 2018 sample). Likewise, although the Toronto Blue Jays moved home stadiums in the 2020 season to Buffalo, this change is minor (the great circle distance between airports is only 110 km).

3. Results

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

3.1. 2018 Season

For all four major leagues, seasons beginning in 2018 were unaffected by the COVID-19 pandemic. During those seasons, I estimate that the teams in these leagues traveled 7 500 998 km by air on 5655 flights taken on private jets and chartered aircraft. Emissions from these flights totaled 121 841 tonnes of carbon dioxide (tCO2). Assuming a typical flight carries between 40 and 80 passengers, emissions per passenger kilometer range from 0.20 to 0.41 kgCO2/pkm which is consistent with those of first-class passengers on commercial aircraft. (30)
Total emissions from air travel varied considerably between leagues (Figure 1). Emissions were lowest in the NFL which only holds 16 regular season games per team per year. Emissions in the MLB were only 1.6 times higher than in the NFL (22 966 tCO2 compared to 14 743 tCO2) despite having ten times as many regular season games (162). This is partially because NFL teams only play once a week and return home after every game, and also because MLB games tend to take place in series where the same two teams play consecutive games in the same arena (“baseball-style” series). Though the regular season is the same length (82 games) in the NBA and NHL, emissions from NBA air travel were estimated to be higher than emissions from the NHL because most NBA teams travel in larger aircraft with higher rates of fuel burn. Note that the four leagues have roughly the same number of teams (30 in the MLB and NBA, 31 in the NHL, and 32 in the NFL).

Figure 1

Figure 1. Emissions from air travel in 2018 for the four major North American sports leagues: the National Basketball Association (NBA), National Hockey League (NHL), Major League Baseball (MLB), and National Football League (NFL). See SI Table S1 for data breakdown.

Emissions from air travel in the major leagues are also dependent on the distances between team locations. The NBA and NHL are organized into Eastern and Western Conferences and teams in the same conference play one another more frequently which creates efficient geographic sorting (Figure 2). In the MLB and NFL, historical mergers of two separate leagues have resulted in teams being grouped into a National League/Conference and an American League/Conference. In both the MLB and NFL, teams in the same League/Conference play more games against one another, but since these groupings are not based on any geographic division, there is limited advantage in terms of reduced travel. This points to the potential for leagues to reduce emissions by rearranging their scheduling practices.

Figure 2

Figure 2. All trips taken during the full 2018 season (preseason, regular season, and playoffs). Each line represents one trip, including flights and shorter journeys assumed to be taken over land. Yellow lines represent trips by teams in the Eastern Conference, American Football Conference, or American League, while purple lines represent trips by teams in the Western Conference, National Football Conference, or National League.

The greater density of teams based on the East Coast creates disparities in the travel burden experienced by players. Teams in the Northeast and in more central locations tend to travel substantially less than teams on the West Coast (SI Figure S1), who therefore face a competitive disadvantage from increased fatigue. For instance, in the 2018 NHL regular season, when teams traveled between games the mean distance for Western Conference teams was 1324 km (SD = 988 km) compared to 1015 km (SD = 945 km) for Eastern Conference teams. According to a Welch’s two sample t test, this is a significant difference (t(1764.3) = −6.7727, p <. 001). In the NBA, mean distance for Western Conference teams was 1336 km (SD = 812 km) compared to 1141 km (SD = 785 km) for Eastern Conference teams (t(1779.3) = −5.1579, p <. 001). Introducing scheduling changes that increase geographic sorting may also create opportunities to address a competitive imbalance.

3.2. COVID-19 Disruption

In attempts to reduce potential staff and player exposure to the COVID-19 virus, the four major leagues implemented a series of procedural and scheduling changes which can be used as natural experiments to understand policies that could reduce emissions from air travel. During the pandemic, leagues shortened schedules, shifted arena locations, canceled overseas games, introduced baseball-style series, and increased geographic sorting of team schedules. Table 1 describes the most relevant scheduling practices held before and after the pandemic by the four leagues.
Table 1
 NBANHLMLBNFL
policy20182020201820202018202020182020
schedules sorted by regionmoderatemoderatemoderatestrictminimalstrictminimalminimal
consecutive repeating games0%10%0%42%68%67%0%0%
overseas gamesa30700030
regular season length (games)82728256162601616
a

Does not include games played in Puerto Rico.

Geographic Sorting

Though the NHL already sorted teams by conference in previous seasons (Figure 2), in order to reduce travel and isolate potential outbreaks, the NHL created four groupings in 2020 such that teams in a group only played one another during the regular season (Figure 3). The groupings were not geographically optimal since Canadian teams, which are broadly spaced across the country, were grouped together to eliminate the need for United States–Canada border crossings. Still, combined with the elimination of overseas games this had the effect of reducing the average distance per trip by 21.4% from 2018 to 2020.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Trips taken for team travel during the regular season in 2020. Each line represents one trip, including flights and shorter journeys assumed to be taken over land. Yellow lines represent trips by teams in the Eastern Conference, American Football Conference, or American League, while purple lines represent trips by teams in the Western Conference, National Football Conference, or National League. The NBA 2020 panel displays trips from the first half of the season only.

The MLB previously had poor geographic sorting in 2018 and likewise grouped teams by region for the 2020 season. They did this without rearranging the traditional American and National Leagues but instead simply altered the schedule so that teams only played in their own Division (a smaller group within the American and National Leagues) or in the Division from the corresponding region in the other League. This greatly increased geographic sorting such that distance per trip decreased by 30.0% from the 2018 to the 2020 season.

Consecutive Repeating Games

Both emissions and player travel were also reduced in 2020 due to a smaller number of trips taken (Figure 4). In 2018, only the MLB held games with repeated matches between teams in the same location during the regular season. But in 2020 the NBA introduced occasional baseball-style series such that 10% of regular season games in the first half of the season were consecutive repeats: the same two teams playing an additional game in the same location. The NHL implemented the same policy more aggressively: 42% of regular season games in 2020 were consecutive repeats. Major League Baseball continued this practice with 68% of regular season games occurring as consecutive repeats in 2018 and 67% in 2020. The NFL held no baseball-style series games in either season (though they did cancel overseas games in 2020).

Figure 4

Figure 4. Emissions per game, distance traveled per trip and number of trips per game in the four major league sports during the 2018 and 2020 regular seasons. See SI Table S2.

Overseas Games

Teams occasionally play games abroad. Due to the greater distances traveled, I assume that these trips are taken in larger aircraft with greater ranges, thus increasing their climate impact. Additionally, because neither team is playing “at home” these games can require more trips per game since both teams take flights to and from the game. By substituting the emissions of each overseas flight (those over 5000 km) with the average emissions of nonoverseas flights, I estimate that replacing all overseas games with exhibition games at non-home team locations in North America would have reduced emissions in 2018 by 3.3%. Note that the number of international games varies substantially between leagues and between seasons, and that this estimate includes preseason overseas games.
We can use the emissions per game from each league in 2020 to estimate the emissions reductions that would be expected if the same policies (baseball-style series, geographic sorting, and cancellation of overseas games) were implemented in a typical, regular length season. Even without making changes to the 2018 preseason or playoffs, I estimate total air travel emissions in 2018 would have decreased by 26 814 tCO2 under such policies or 22% of air travel emissions that year.

3.3. Additional Policies

Although the type of aircraft used by each team is not always public knowledge, there are cases when this information is available and can be used to assess mitigation options. For instance, most teams in the NBA fly 757s to games, which are substantially larger than the aircraft previously chartered by the league. (19) I estimate that switching NBA league aircraft from 757s to smaller A319s would have resulted in league-wide air travel emissions reductions of 25.5% in 2018.
Finally, leagues could reduce air travel emissions simply by playing fewer games. The NBA at one point considered shortening their season and adding an in-season tournament; both policies have broad support among fans. (29) Dropping four games from the regular season (an option considered by the NBA) would have reduced 2018 emissions by 2093 tCO2, or 4.3% for the whole season (including playoffs and preseason). Reducing the regular season by 10 games would reduce 2018 air travel emissions by 5232 tCO2 or by 10.8% for the season. But if the league created a new, in-season tournament to compensate for lost revenue, emissions reductions from the shorter season could be partially offset or eliminated. For instance, a tournament played in Las Vegas where every team takes a return flight from their home stadium would produce 2214 tCO2 (though a more centrally located tournament in Chicago would only produce 1576 tCO2). For an overview of each policy and their relative mitigation potential see Table 2.
Table 2
policyco-benefitsupper estimate of potential CO2 reductionsa
cancel overseas gamesbreduced player fatigue/injuries7.8% (NFL)
cost savings (fuel)
reduce regular seasonreduced player fatigue/injuries10.8% (NBA)
sort schedules by regionreduced player fatigue/injuries19.9% (MLB)
reduced competitive disadvantages
cost savings (fuel)
right-size aircraftcost savings (fuel)25.5% (NBA)
increase consecutive repeating gamesreduced player fatigue/injuries33.0% (NHL)
cost savings (fuel)
a

Relevant league in parentheses, provided as a percentage of that league’s 2018 air travel emissions.

b

Does not include games played in Puerto Rico.

3.4. Policy Implications

In 2020, the four major leagues adopted policies in response to the pandemic which would reduce air travel emissions by an estimated 22% per year in a normal season. Additional policies could extend these reductions even further. For instance, the NHL’s scheduling changes were comprehensive (both in terms of geographic sorting and consecutive repeated games) and cut emissions per regular season game in half (Figure 4). The NBA experienced a much smaller decline in emissions but could achieve greater cuts by increasing the number of consecutive repeated games. Likewise, the NFL, with relatively low overall air travel emissions, could still take steps to improve geographic sorting. Leagues (especially the NBA) could also consider booking more right-sized, fuel-efficient aircraft. At one point the NFL investigated buying or leasing its own fleet of jets as a cost-saving measure: (31) such a league-wide standard would avoid incentivizing teams to compete for free agent players by offering increasingly luxurious (and inefficient) aircraft. Finally, shortened seasons would reduce player fatigue and could be adopted by any league seeking to cut back on air travel.
The absolute emissions from major league sports are globally small. Air travel from the four major leagues would only constitute 0.3% of emissions from private aviation, which is itself only 4% of global emissions from aviation. (1) Still, there would be considerable value in teams, leagues, and players acting as climate messengers in a region where much of the public remains skeptical of climate action. (32) Whereas emissions from stadium operations or spectator travel will drop as the energy and transport sectors decarbonize, flight emissions will remain high. Provided that the stated reductions are not canceled out by other policies that grow emissions, taking steps to reduce air travel could signal genuine climate engagement.
The lessons learned from major league sports have possible carbon reduction implications in other industries. Medical residency interviews and major conferences can be regionalized to reduce emissions, for instance. (33,34) In some cases organizations will continue allowing remote work after the pandemic but may fly team members to one location for occasional, in-person meetings. Whether meetings are geographically optimized could determine if emissions saved from reduced commuting are canceled by the increased emissions from air travel. Still, these changes involve many passengers dispersed on many commercial aircraft, whereas this study evaluates the movement of entire aircraft and is therefore more analogous to corporations chartering aircraft or the wealthy flying in private jets.
Industry proponents claim that chartered aircraft and private jets are an “essential tool” of companies and organizations, (35) but it is difficult for researchers to evaluate the degree to which these flights are actually essential; Data on private aviation is quite limited, (1) partially because of high levels of privacy not afforded to commercial travel. (36) But the findings of this study suggest that, at least in the sports industry, many flights could be eliminated or made more efficient. The trend of teams opting for increasingly larger aircraft, with one franchise owner going so far as to purchase multiple aircraft as backups for the same team (37) indicates a relative indifference to the costs of air travel. If sports teams can take on additional travel costs, they could voluntarily form partnerships with airlines to purchase sustainable aviation fuels, thereby helping to grow a nascent technology (38) which could prove to be a critical tool in decarbonizing aviation. (39)
In addition to purchasing sustainable aviation fuels, sizable reductions in emissions could be achieved without sacrifice by making fewer, shorter trips. For teams in the NBA, NHL, and MLB, reduced air travel presents major benefits for player performance and injury prevention. (40) In the NBA, the negative impact of injuries and the discretionary resting of star players has already prompted the league to improve scheduling by restricting back to back game nights. (41) While a variety of policies can improve player health, the 2020 season demonstrated that sorting league schedules by region and using baseball-style series to reduce trips taken and kilometers traveled offer win-win solutions for players, fans, and the climate.

Supporting Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.1c03422.

  • Supporting Infoprmation Text: Sources for league schedules; Figure S1: Cumulative distance flown by teams; Table S1: Data for Figure 1; Table S2: Data for Figure 4; Table S3: List of teams and corresponding aircraft (PDF)

  • Data set S1: Trip data (XLSX)

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

Acknowledgments

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

Thanks to Michael Kosteski and Conor McDowell for helpful suggestions on an earlier draft of this manuscript.

References

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

This article references 41 other publications.

  1. 1
    Gössling, S.; Humpe, A. The global scale, distribution and growth of aviation: Implications for climate change. Global Environ. Change 2020, 65, 102194,  DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102194
  2. 2
    Bows-Larkin, A. All adrift: aviation, shipping, and climate change policy. Climate Policy 2015, 15 (6), 681702,  DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2014.965125
  3. 3
    Schäfer, A. W.; Barrett, S. R. H.; Doyme, K.; Dray, L. M.; Gnadt, A. R.; Self, R.; O’Sullivan, A.; Synodinos, A. P.; Torija, A. J. Technological, economic and environmental prospects of all-electric aircraft. Nature Energy 2019, 4 (2), 160,  DOI: 10.1038/s41560-018-0294-x
  4. 4
    Bock, L.; Burkhardt, U. Contrail cirrus radiative forcing for future air traffic. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2019, 19 (12), 81638174,  DOI: 10.5194/acp-19-8163-2019
  5. 5
    Gössling, S.; Humpe, A.; Fichert, F.; Creutzig, F. COVID-19 and pathways to low-carbon air transport until 2050. Environ. Res. Lett. 2021, 16 (3), 034063,  DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/abe90b
  6. 6
    Berry, A. M.; Murphy, A.; Seven, J.; Arts, K.; van Dijk, M.; Carter, M.; Harrison, P. Long-Term Aviation Fuel Decarbonization: Progress, Roadblocks, And Policy Opportunities; The International Council on Clean Transportation, 2019.
  7. 7
    Sharmina, M.; Edelenbosch, O.; Wilson, C.; Freeman, R.; Gernaat, D.; Gilbert, P.; Larkin, A.; Littleton, E.; Traut, M.; Van Vuuren, D. Decarbonising the critical sectors of aviation, shipping, road freight and industry to limit warming to 1.5–2° C. Climate Policy 2021, 21 (4), 120,  DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2020.1831430
  8. 8
    Carim, M. M.; Nencetti, L. NHL FY2014–16 Verification Statement; First Environment, 2018.https://sustainability.nhl.com/report/pdf/NHL_FY2014-16_Verification_Statement.pdf (accessed 2021-08-08).
  9. 9
    NHL Reducing carbon emissions. https://sustainability.nhl.com/report/#!/innovate/reducing-emissions (accessed 2021-08-08).
  10. 10
    Transport Canada. Building a green economy: Government of Canada to require 100% of car and passenger truck sales be zero-emission by 2035 in Canada, 2021.
  11. 11
    Office of Governor Newsom, Governor Newsom Announces California Will Phase Out Gasoline-Powered Cars & Drastically Reduce Demand for Fossil Fuel in California’s Fight Against Climate Change. 2020.
  12. 12
    Shields, L. State Renewable Portfolio Standards and Goals. https://www.ncsl.org/research/energy/renewable-portfolio-standards.aspx (accessed 2021-08-08).
  13. 13
    Government of Canada. Powering our future with clean electricity. https://www.canada.ca/en/services/environment/weather/climatechange/climate-action/powering-future-clean-energy.html (accessed 2021-08-08).
  14. 14
    Zheng, Z. S.; Rutherford, D. Reducing aircraft CO2 emissions: The role of U.S. federal, state, and local policies; The International Council on Clean Transportation: 2021.
  15. 15
    Bouckaert, S.; Fernandez Pales, A.; McGlade, C.; Remme, U.; Wanner, B.; Varro, L.; D’Ambrosio, D.; Spencer, T. Net Zero by 2050-A Roadmap for the Global Energy Sector. International Energy Agency: 2021.
  16. 16
    Payne, W.; Reynolds, M.; Brown, S.; Fleming, A. Sports role models and their impact on participation in physical activity: a literature review. Victoria: VicHealth 2003, 74, 155
  17. 17
    Kilgore, A.; Golliver, B., Most sports leagues pause with second day of protests, some more unified than others. Washington Post 2020.
  18. 18
    Parks, M.; Swasey, B. Need a Polling Place With Social Distancing? 3 NBA Teams Offer Venues; NPR, 2020.
  19. 19
    Sasso, M., NBA Players Get Roomier Chartered Jets as Delta Air Adds Teams. Bloomberg 2015. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-07-06/nba-players-get-roomier-chartered-jets-as-delta-air-adds-teams (accessed 2021-08-08).
  20. 20
    Davis, S., Drake is lending his $185 million custom plane, ’Air Drake,’ to the Sacramento Kings for a preseason trip to India. Business Insider 2019. https://www.businessinsider.in/sports/news/drake-is-lending-his-185-million-custom-plane-air-drake-to-the-sacramento-kings-for-a-preseason-trip-to-india/articleshow/71381906.cms (accessed 2021-08-08).
  21. 21
    Tricarico, E.; Simms, A. Sweat Not Oil: Why Sports Should Drop Advertising and Sponsorship from High-Carbon Polluters; New Weather Institute, 2021.
  22. 22
    Williams, A. P.; Abatzoglou, J. T.; Gershunov, A.; Guzman-Morales, J.; Bishop, D. A.; Balch, J. K.; Lettenmaier, D. P. Observed impacts of anthropogenic climate change on wildfire in California. Earth's Future 2019, 7 (8), 892910,  DOI: 10.1029/2019EF001210
  23. 23
    Abatzoglou, J. T.; Williams, A. P. Impact of anthropogenic climate change on wildfire across western US forests. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2016, 113 (42), 1177011775,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1607171113
  24. 24
    Beaton, A.; Diamond, J., California wildfires add to safety worries for MLB, NFL. Wall Street Journal 2020. https://www.wsj.com/articles/california-wildfires-add-to-safety-worries-for-mlb-nfl-11599833655 (accessed 2021-08-08).
  25. 25
    Martin, J., LeBron James evacuates from his home because of the Los Angeles wildfires. CNN 2019. https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/28/us/lebron-james-evacuates-home-due-to-la-fire-trnd/index.html (accessed 2021-03-17).
  26. 26
    ICAO. ICAO Carbon Emissions Calculator Methodology Version 10; International Civil Aviation Organization, 2017.
  27. 27
    Lee, D. S.; Fahey, D.; Skowron, A.; Allen, M.; Burkhardt, U.; Chen, Q.; Doherty, S.; Freeman, S.; Forster, P.; Fuglestvedt, J. The contribution of global aviation to anthropogenic climate forcing for 2000 to 2018. Atmos. Environ. 2021, 244, 117834,  DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117834
  28. 28
    Jungbluth, N.; Meili, C. Recommendations for calculation of the global warming potential of aviation including the radiative forcing index. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2019, 24 (3), 404411,  DOI: 10.1007/s11367-018-1556-3
  29. 29
    Reynolds, T. NBA proposes 78-game regular season, in-season tournament. https://www.nba.com/news/nba-proposes-78-game-season-among-changes (accessed 2021-03-17).
  30. 30
    BEIS, Greenhouse gas reporting: conversion factors 2021. 2021.
  31. 31
    Kaplan, D., NFL grounds plans to join jet set. Business Journals 2018.
  32. 32
    Goldberg, M.; Gustafson, A.; Rosenthal, S.; Kotcher, J.; Maibach, E.; Leiserowitz, A. For the First Time, The Alarmed Are Now the Largest of Global Warming’s Six Americas, Yale Program on Climate Change Communication; Yale University and George Mason University: New Haven, CT, 2020.
  33. 33
    Liang, K. E.; Dawson, J. Q.; Stoian, M. D.; Clark, D. G.; Wynes, S.; Donner, S. D. A carbon footprint study of the Canadian medical residency interview tour. Med. Teach. 2021, 17,  DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2021.1944612
  34. 34
    Klöwer, M.; Hopkins, D.; Allen, M.; Higham, J. An analysis of ways to decarbonize conference travel after COVID-19; Nature Publishing Group, 2020.
  35. 35
    National Business Aviation Association. Business Aviation Fact Book ; 2021.
  36. 36
    Budd, L.; Hubbard, P., The bizjet set: Business aviation and the social geographies of private flight.
  37. 37
    National Football League An Inside Look At The Patriots’ Private Jet. https://www.nfl.com/news/an-inside-look-at-the-patriots-private-jet-0ap3000000857057. (accessed 2021-08-11).
  38. 38
    Graver, B. Sports Teams Should Strive to Be World Champions...of SAFs. The International Council on Clean Transportation: 2021. https://theicct.org/blog/staff/sports-teams-and-safs-jun2021 (accessed 2021-08-11).
  39. 39
    Pavlenko, N. An Assessment of the Policy Options for Driving Sustainable Aviation Fuels in the European Union; The International Council on Clean Transportation: 2021.
  40. 40
    Huyghe, T.; Scanlan, A. T.; Dalbo, V. J.; Calleja-González, J. The negative influence of air travel on health and performance in the national basketball association: a narrative review. Sports 2018, 6 (3), 89,  DOI: 10.3390/sports6030089
  41. 41
    Zillgitt, J., NBA schedule more player friendly with fewer back-to-back games. USA Today 2015. https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/2015/08/12/nba-schedule-more-player-friendly-fewer-back-back-games/31564149/ (accessed 2021-03-17).

Cited By

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

This article is cited by 5 publications.

  1. Daniel Scott, Natalie L. B. Knowles, Siyao Ma, Michelle Rutty, Robert Steiger. Climate change and the future of the Olympic Winter Games: athlete and coach perspectives. Current Issues in Tourism 2023, 26 (3) , 480-495. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2021.2023480
  2. Dalia Perkumienė, Ahmet Atalay, Biruta Švagždienė. Carbon Footprint Stemming from Ice Sports on the Turkey and Lithuanian Scale. Energies 2023, 16 (3) , 1476. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16031476
  3. Robert L. Wilby, Madeleine Orr, Duncan Depledge, Richard Giulianotti, George Havenith, Jamie A. Kenyon, Tom K. R. Matthews, Stephen A. Mears, Donal J. Mullan, Lee Taylor. The impacts of sport emissions on climate: Measurement, mitigation, and making a difference. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 2023, 1519 (1) , 20-33. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.14925
  4. Madeleine Orr, Jessica Murfree, Laura Stargel. (Re)scheduling as a climate mitigation and adaptation strategy. Managing Sport and Leisure 2022, 20 , 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1080/23750472.2022.2159501
  5. Leslie Mabon. Football and climate change: what do we know, and what is needed for an evidence-informed response?. Climate Policy 2022, 15 , 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2022.2147895
  • Abstract

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. Emissions from air travel in 2018 for the four major North American sports leagues: the National Basketball Association (NBA), National Hockey League (NHL), Major League Baseball (MLB), and National Football League (NFL). See SI Table S1 for data breakdown.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. All trips taken during the full 2018 season (preseason, regular season, and playoffs). Each line represents one trip, including flights and shorter journeys assumed to be taken over land. Yellow lines represent trips by teams in the Eastern Conference, American Football Conference, or American League, while purple lines represent trips by teams in the Western Conference, National Football Conference, or National League.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. Trips taken for team travel during the regular season in 2020. Each line represents one trip, including flights and shorter journeys assumed to be taken over land. Yellow lines represent trips by teams in the Eastern Conference, American Football Conference, or American League, while purple lines represent trips by teams in the Western Conference, National Football Conference, or National League. The NBA 2020 panel displays trips from the first half of the season only.

    Figure 4

    Figure 4. Emissions per game, distance traveled per trip and number of trips per game in the four major league sports during the 2018 and 2020 regular seasons. See SI Table S2.

  • References

    ARTICLE SECTIONS
    Jump To

    This article references 41 other publications.

    1. 1
      Gössling, S.; Humpe, A. The global scale, distribution and growth of aviation: Implications for climate change. Global Environ. Change 2020, 65, 102194,  DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102194
    2. 2
      Bows-Larkin, A. All adrift: aviation, shipping, and climate change policy. Climate Policy 2015, 15 (6), 681702,  DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2014.965125
    3. 3
      Schäfer, A. W.; Barrett, S. R. H.; Doyme, K.; Dray, L. M.; Gnadt, A. R.; Self, R.; O’Sullivan, A.; Synodinos, A. P.; Torija, A. J. Technological, economic and environmental prospects of all-electric aircraft. Nature Energy 2019, 4 (2), 160,  DOI: 10.1038/s41560-018-0294-x
    4. 4
      Bock, L.; Burkhardt, U. Contrail cirrus radiative forcing for future air traffic. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2019, 19 (12), 81638174,  DOI: 10.5194/acp-19-8163-2019
    5. 5
      Gössling, S.; Humpe, A.; Fichert, F.; Creutzig, F. COVID-19 and pathways to low-carbon air transport until 2050. Environ. Res. Lett. 2021, 16 (3), 034063,  DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/abe90b
    6. 6
      Berry, A. M.; Murphy, A.; Seven, J.; Arts, K.; van Dijk, M.; Carter, M.; Harrison, P. Long-Term Aviation Fuel Decarbonization: Progress, Roadblocks, And Policy Opportunities; The International Council on Clean Transportation, 2019.
    7. 7
      Sharmina, M.; Edelenbosch, O.; Wilson, C.; Freeman, R.; Gernaat, D.; Gilbert, P.; Larkin, A.; Littleton, E.; Traut, M.; Van Vuuren, D. Decarbonising the critical sectors of aviation, shipping, road freight and industry to limit warming to 1.5–2° C. Climate Policy 2021, 21 (4), 120,  DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2020.1831430
    8. 8
      Carim, M. M.; Nencetti, L. NHL FY2014–16 Verification Statement; First Environment, 2018.https://sustainability.nhl.com/report/pdf/NHL_FY2014-16_Verification_Statement.pdf (accessed 2021-08-08).
    9. 9
      NHL Reducing carbon emissions. https://sustainability.nhl.com/report/#!/innovate/reducing-emissions (accessed 2021-08-08).
    10. 10
      Transport Canada. Building a green economy: Government of Canada to require 100% of car and passenger truck sales be zero-emission by 2035 in Canada, 2021.
    11. 11
      Office of Governor Newsom, Governor Newsom Announces California Will Phase Out Gasoline-Powered Cars & Drastically Reduce Demand for Fossil Fuel in California’s Fight Against Climate Change. 2020.
    12. 12
      Shields, L. State Renewable Portfolio Standards and Goals. https://www.ncsl.org/research/energy/renewable-portfolio-standards.aspx (accessed 2021-08-08).
    13. 13
      Government of Canada. Powering our future with clean electricity. https://www.canada.ca/en/services/environment/weather/climatechange/climate-action/powering-future-clean-energy.html (accessed 2021-08-08).
    14. 14
      Zheng, Z. S.; Rutherford, D. Reducing aircraft CO2 emissions: The role of U.S. federal, state, and local policies; The International Council on Clean Transportation: 2021.
    15. 15
      Bouckaert, S.; Fernandez Pales, A.; McGlade, C.; Remme, U.; Wanner, B.; Varro, L.; D’Ambrosio, D.; Spencer, T. Net Zero by 2050-A Roadmap for the Global Energy Sector. International Energy Agency: 2021.
    16. 16
      Payne, W.; Reynolds, M.; Brown, S.; Fleming, A. Sports role models and their impact on participation in physical activity: a literature review. Victoria: VicHealth 2003, 74, 155
    17. 17
      Kilgore, A.; Golliver, B., Most sports leagues pause with second day of protests, some more unified than others. Washington Post 2020.
    18. 18
      Parks, M.; Swasey, B. Need a Polling Place With Social Distancing? 3 NBA Teams Offer Venues; NPR, 2020.
    19. 19
      Sasso, M., NBA Players Get Roomier Chartered Jets as Delta Air Adds Teams. Bloomberg 2015. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-07-06/nba-players-get-roomier-chartered-jets-as-delta-air-adds-teams (accessed 2021-08-08).
    20. 20
      Davis, S., Drake is lending his $185 million custom plane, ’Air Drake,’ to the Sacramento Kings for a preseason trip to India. Business Insider 2019. https://www.businessinsider.in/sports/news/drake-is-lending-his-185-million-custom-plane-air-drake-to-the-sacramento-kings-for-a-preseason-trip-to-india/articleshow/71381906.cms (accessed 2021-08-08).
    21. 21
      Tricarico, E.; Simms, A. Sweat Not Oil: Why Sports Should Drop Advertising and Sponsorship from High-Carbon Polluters; New Weather Institute, 2021.
    22. 22
      Williams, A. P.; Abatzoglou, J. T.; Gershunov, A.; Guzman-Morales, J.; Bishop, D. A.; Balch, J. K.; Lettenmaier, D. P. Observed impacts of anthropogenic climate change on wildfire in California. Earth's Future 2019, 7 (8), 892910,  DOI: 10.1029/2019EF001210
    23. 23
      Abatzoglou, J. T.; Williams, A. P. Impact of anthropogenic climate change on wildfire across western US forests. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2016, 113 (42), 1177011775,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1607171113
    24. 24
      Beaton, A.; Diamond, J., California wildfires add to safety worries for MLB, NFL. Wall Street Journal 2020. https://www.wsj.com/articles/california-wildfires-add-to-safety-worries-for-mlb-nfl-11599833655 (accessed 2021-08-08).
    25. 25
      Martin, J., LeBron James evacuates from his home because of the Los Angeles wildfires. CNN 2019. https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/28/us/lebron-james-evacuates-home-due-to-la-fire-trnd/index.html (accessed 2021-03-17).
    26. 26
      ICAO. ICAO Carbon Emissions Calculator Methodology Version 10; International Civil Aviation Organization, 2017.
    27. 27
      Lee, D. S.; Fahey, D.; Skowron, A.; Allen, M.; Burkhardt, U.; Chen, Q.; Doherty, S.; Freeman, S.; Forster, P.; Fuglestvedt, J. The contribution of global aviation to anthropogenic climate forcing for 2000 to 2018. Atmos. Environ. 2021, 244, 117834,  DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117834
    28. 28
      Jungbluth, N.; Meili, C. Recommendations for calculation of the global warming potential of aviation including the radiative forcing index. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2019, 24 (3), 404411,  DOI: 10.1007/s11367-018-1556-3
    29. 29
      Reynolds, T. NBA proposes 78-game regular season, in-season tournament. https://www.nba.com/news/nba-proposes-78-game-season-among-changes (accessed 2021-03-17).
    30. 30
      BEIS, Greenhouse gas reporting: conversion factors 2021. 2021.
    31. 31
      Kaplan, D., NFL grounds plans to join jet set. Business Journals 2018.
    32. 32
      Goldberg, M.; Gustafson, A.; Rosenthal, S.; Kotcher, J.; Maibach, E.; Leiserowitz, A. For the First Time, The Alarmed Are Now the Largest of Global Warming’s Six Americas, Yale Program on Climate Change Communication; Yale University and George Mason University: New Haven, CT, 2020.
    33. 33
      Liang, K. E.; Dawson, J. Q.; Stoian, M. D.; Clark, D. G.; Wynes, S.; Donner, S. D. A carbon footprint study of the Canadian medical residency interview tour. Med. Teach. 2021, 17,  DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2021.1944612
    34. 34
      Klöwer, M.; Hopkins, D.; Allen, M.; Higham, J. An analysis of ways to decarbonize conference travel after COVID-19; Nature Publishing Group, 2020.
    35. 35
      National Business Aviation Association. Business Aviation Fact Book ; 2021.
    36. 36
      Budd, L.; Hubbard, P., The bizjet set: Business aviation and the social geographies of private flight.
    37. 37
      National Football League An Inside Look At The Patriots’ Private Jet. https://www.nfl.com/news/an-inside-look-at-the-patriots-private-jet-0ap3000000857057. (accessed 2021-08-11).
    38. 38
      Graver, B. Sports Teams Should Strive to Be World Champions...of SAFs. The International Council on Clean Transportation: 2021. https://theicct.org/blog/staff/sports-teams-and-safs-jun2021 (accessed 2021-08-11).
    39. 39
      Pavlenko, N. An Assessment of the Policy Options for Driving Sustainable Aviation Fuels in the European Union; The International Council on Clean Transportation: 2021.
    40. 40
      Huyghe, T.; Scanlan, A. T.; Dalbo, V. J.; Calleja-González, J. The negative influence of air travel on health and performance in the national basketball association: a narrative review. Sports 2018, 6 (3), 89,  DOI: 10.3390/sports6030089
    41. 41
      Zillgitt, J., NBA schedule more player friendly with fewer back-to-back games. USA Today 2015. https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/2015/08/12/nba-schedule-more-player-friendly-fewer-back-back-games/31564149/ (accessed 2021-03-17).
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information

    ARTICLE SECTIONS
    Jump To

    The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.1c03422.

    • Supporting Infoprmation Text: Sources for league schedules; Figure S1: Cumulative distance flown by teams; Table S1: Data for Figure 1; Table S2: Data for Figure 4; Table S3: List of teams and corresponding aircraft (PDF)

    • Data set S1: Trip data (XLSX)


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

You’ve supercharged your research process with ACS and Mendeley!

STEP 1:
Click to create an ACS ID

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

MENDELEY PAIRING EXPIRED
Your Mendeley pairing has expired. Please reconnect