Energy-Optimal Siting of Decentralized Water Recycling SystemsClick to copy article linkArticle link copied!
- Yang LiuYang LiuDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, United StatesMore by Yang Liu
- Alison SimAlison SimDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, United StatesMore by Alison Sim
- Meagan S. Mauter*Meagan S. Mauter*Email: [email protected]Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, United StatesMore by Meagan S. Mauter
Abstract
Decentralized water recycling systems (DWRS) have emerged as a viable option for incrementally augmenting water supply in water-stressed regions, but DWRS are generally more energy-intensive than traditional centralized water treatment systems. When DWRS are deployed incrementally in small batches, the marginal energy intensity (MEI) of water supply quantifies the location-specific energy footprint of centralized water supply and serves as a robust metric measuring the energy implications of replacing centralized supply with DWRS supply. This research develops and applies a MEI-based decision framework that identifies the energy-optimal siting of DWRS to minimize the overall system operational energy consumption given a target fraction of water demand to be met by newly deployed DWRS. In a small benchmark water supply system where the energy intensity of the intended DWRS is 5.3% higher than the current system average energy intensity of centralized supply, we demonstrate that the optimal siting of DWRS to offset 10% of the system-wide water demand reduces the overall system energy consumption by 0.77%. In contrast, the naive and worst-case siting of the same DWRS increases the energy consumption of the overall system by 0.65 and 2.0%, respectively. The proposed MEI-based decision framework is particularly valuable for application in large multi-source systems, where an optimization-based approach is computationally intractable. This study highlights the importance of accounting for both distribution and treatment energy intensity when evaluating new water sources and demonstrates the viability of DWRS as an energy-efficient tool for augmenting water supply.
Cited By
Smart citations by scite.ai include citation statements extracted from the full text of the citing article. The number of the statements may be higher than the number of citations provided by ACS Publications if one paper cites another multiple times or lower if scite has not yet processed some of the citing articles.
This article is cited by 8 publications.
- Yue Li, Zhongming Lu, Xiangru Zhang, Qingfu Zhang, Huifu Xu, Jimmy C. H. Fung, Glen Daigger. Multiobjective Spatial Optimization Framework for Determining the Optimal Degree of Decentralization for Nonpotable Water Reuse in Existing Cities: A Case Study of Hong Kong. Environmental Science & Technology 2024, 58
(46)
, 20424-20433. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c04755
- Dezhen Kong, Yumeng Zhao, Runzhi Wang, Jiaxuan Li, Jinkuo Li, Jun Ma. Inorganic Electrified Membrane: From Basic Science to Performance Translation. ACS ES&T Engineering 2023, 3
(12)
, 2123-2146. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestengg.3c00173
- Yang Liu, Meagan S. Mauter. High-Resolution Carbon Accounting Framework for Urban Water Supply Systems. Environmental Science & Technology 2022, 56
(19)
, 13920-13930. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c04127
- Yiseul Hong, Jooyoung Park, Yoonhee Ha. Trade-offs between water security and energy use: Lifecycle energy of water supply options in Paju, Korea. Journal of Cleaner Production 2023, 423 , 138601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138601
- Dazhen Zhang, Xin Dong, Siyu Zeng, Xu Wang, Daoxiao Gong, Li Mo. Wastewater reuse and energy saving require a more decentralized urban wastewater system? Evidence from multi-objective optimal design at the city scale. Water Research 2023, 235 , 119923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2023.119923
- María J. López-Serrano, Fida Hussain Lakho, Stijn W. H. Van Hulle, Ana Batlles-delaFuente. Life cycle cost assessment and economic analysis of a decentralized wastewater treatment to achieve water sustainability within the framework of circular economy. Oeconomia Copernicana 2023, 14
(1)
, 103-133. https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2023.003
- Natalia Klanovicz, Thamarys Scapini, Aline Frumi Camargo, Larissa Pinheiro de Souza, Juliana Mendonça Silva de Jesus, Priscila Hasse Palharim, Helen Treichel, Antonio Carlos Silva Costa Teixeira. Removal of pharmaceuticals by on-site and decentralized wastewater treatment systems. 2023, 185-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-95684-0.00013-0
- Yue Li, Weiwei Mo, Sybil Derrible, Zhongming Lu. Integration of multi-objective spatial optimization and data-driven interpretation to direct the city-wide sustainable promotion of building-based decentralized water technologies. Water Research 2022, 222 , 118880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2022.118880
Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.
Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.
The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.