ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
Exposure to Contemporary and Emerging Chemicals in Commerce among Pregnant Women in the United States: The Environmental influences on Child Health Outcome (ECHO) Program
My Activity

Figure 1Loading Img
  • Open Access
Ecotoxicology and Public Health

Exposure to Contemporary and Emerging Chemicals in Commerce among Pregnant Women in the United States: The Environmental influences on Child Health Outcome (ECHO) Program
Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

  • Jessie P. Buckley
    Jessie P. Buckley
    Department of Environmental Health and Engineering, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, United States
  • Jordan R. Kuiper
    Jordan R. Kuiper
    Department of Environmental Health and Engineering, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, United States
  • Deborah H. Bennett
    Deborah H. Bennett
    Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California Davis, Davis, California 95616, United States
  • Emily S. Barrett
    Emily S. Barrett
    Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Rutgers School of Public Health, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854, United States
  • Tracy Bastain
    Tracy Bastain
    Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90032, United States
  • Carrie V. Breton
    Carrie V. Breton
    Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90032, United States
  • Sridhar Chinthakindi
    Sridhar Chinthakindi
    Department of Pediatrics and Department of Environmental Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York 10016, United States
  • Anne L. Dunlop
    Anne L. Dunlop
    Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, United States
  • Shohreh F. Farzan
    Shohreh F. Farzan
    Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90032, United States
  • Julie B. Herbstman
    Julie B. Herbstman
    Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Columbia, New York, NY 10032, United States
  • Margaret R. Karagas
    Margaret R. Karagas
    Department of Epidemiology, Dartmouth Geisel School of Medicine, Lebanon, New Hampshire 03756, United States
  • Carmen J. Marsit
    Carmen J. Marsit
    Department of Environmental Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, United States
  • John D. Meeker
    John D. Meeker
    Department of Environmental Health Sciences, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States
  • Rachel Morello-Frosch
    Rachel Morello-Frosch
    Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management and School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley California 94720, United States
  • Thomas G. O’Connor
    Thomas G. O’Connor
    Department of Psychiatry, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14627, United States
  • Megan E. Romano
    Megan E. Romano
    Department of Epidemiology, Dartmouth Geisel School of Medicine, Lebanon, New Hampshire 03756, United States
  • Susan Schantz
    Susan Schantz
    Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801, United States
  • Rebecca J. Schmidt
    Rebecca J. Schmidt
    Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California Davis, Davis, California 95616, United States
  • Deborah J. Watkins
    Deborah J. Watkins
    Department of Environmental Health Sciences, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States
  • Hongkai Zhu
    Hongkai Zhu
    Department of Pediatrics and Department of Environmental Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York 10016, United States
    More by Hongkai Zhu
  • Edo D. Pellizzari
    Edo D. Pellizzari
    RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709, United States
  • Kurunthachalam Kannan
    Kurunthachalam Kannan
    Department of Pediatrics and Department of Environmental Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York 10016, United States
  • Tracey J. Woodruff*
    Tracey J. Woodruff
    Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences and the Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143, United States
    *Email: [email protected]. Tel: 415-476-3198.
Open PDFSupporting Information (2)

Environmental Science & Technology

Cite this: Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022, 56, 10, 6560–6573
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c08942
Published May 10, 2022

Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under

CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 .

Abstract

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Prenatal chemical exposures can influence maternal and child health; however, few industrial chemicals are routinely biomonitored. We assessed an extensive panel of contemporary and emerging chemicals in 171 pregnant women across the United States (U.S.) and Puerto Rico in the Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) Program. We simultaneously measured urinary concentrations of 89 analytes (103 total chemicals representing 73 parent compounds) in nine chemical groups: bactericides, benzophenones, bisphenols, fungicides and herbicides, insecticides, organophosphate esters (OPEs), parabens, phthalates/alternative plasticizers, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). We estimated associations of creatinine-adjusted concentrations with sociodemographic and specimen characteristics. Among our diverse prenatal population (60% non-Hispanic Black or Hispanic), we detected 73 of 89 analytes in ≥1 participant and 36 in >50% of participants. Five analytes not currently included in the U.S. biomonitoring were detected in ≥90% of samples: benzophenone-1, thiamethoxam, mono-2-(propyl-6-carboxy-hexyl) phthalate, monocarboxy isooctyl phthalate, and monohydroxy-iso-decyl phthalate. Many analyte concentrations were higher among women of Hispanic ethnicity compared to those of non-Hispanic White women. Concentrations of certain chemicals decreased with the calendar year, whereas concentrations of their replacements increased. Our largest study to date identified widespread exposures to prevalent and understudied chemicals in a diverse sample of pregnant women in the U.S.

This publication is licensed under

CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 .
  • cc licence
  • by licence
  • nc licence
  • nd licence
Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society

Synopsis

This largest study to date found exposure to many environmental chemicals in a diverse sample of pregnant women in the United States.

Introduction

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Pregnancy is a susceptible period for both mother and fetus, during which chemical exposures can contribute to numerous adverse pregnancy and child health outcomes. (1−4) Chemical exposures are ubiquitous in the United States (U.S.) due to the thousands of chemicals produced and used in numerous consumer products. Exposures can occur via food, water, air, dust, and use of consumer and personal care products. (4) During pregnancy, many chemicals to which pregnant women are exposed cross the placenta, directly exposing the fetus. (5)
Nationally representative data on chemical exposures are available from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) for approximately 350 of the more than 40,000 chemicals used in the U.S., encompassing a small proportion of potential chemical exposures. (6) A previous study of pregnant women using 2003–2004 NHANES data reported widespread simultaneous exposure to >40 chemicals. (4) The ubiquity of prenatal chemical exposures is likely underestimated because the vast majority of chemicals are not routinely surveyed in NHANES, including compounds with unknown or suspected toxicity and compounds being used as replacements for chemicals being phased out due to potential toxicity or increases in exposure (i.e., “regrettable substitutions”). (7−9) Further, recent data on coexposure to multiple chemicals during pregnancy is lacking because NHANES has not oversampled pregnant participants since 2001–2006. (10) It is critical to improve methods to characterize prenatal chemical exposures more comprehensively and contemporarily.
The National Institutes of Health (NIH) Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) Program provides an unparalleled opportunity for understanding environmental exposures among pregnant women in the U.S. (11) ECHO combines 69 prospectively followed pregnancy and pediatric cohorts comprising approximately 50,000 children and families from across the U.S. to understand and improve child health. (12) ECHO investigators previously recommended biomonitoring highly prevalent contemporary chemicals during pregnancy that are measured in NHANES (11) and emerging chemicals not included in NHANES but which have a high likelihood of exposure, the potential for adverse health effects, and an available biomarker of exposure. (13)
Our goal was to apply a new method for simultaneous measurement of more than 100 chemicals in nine groups of priority contemporary and emerging industrial chemicals and pesticides among pregnant women from nine ECHO cohorts representing a range of geographies and race/ethnicities. We aimed to characterize analyte detection frequencies and distributions and to assess predictors of exposure.

Materials and Methods

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Study Population

We included pregnant women from nine ECHO cohorts located in five states (California, Georgia, Illinois, New Hampshire, New York) and Puerto Rico, reflecting diverse geographic and sociodemographic populations (Table S1, Supporting Information 1). For this initial pilot study, each cohort contributed banked urine specimens from up to 20 ECHO participants (Table S1, Supporting Information 1). The only criterion for inclusion was the availability of a 6 mL of urine specimen collected during pregnancy. The study protocol was approved by the local (or central ECHO) Institutional Review Board (IRB). Written informed consent was obtained from participants in cohort-specific research and/or the ECHO-wide Cohort Data Collection Protocol. The work of the ECHO Data Analysis Center is approved through the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health IRB.

Chemical Analysis

We selected chemicals for analysis in collaboration with the Wadsworth Center-Human Health Exposure Analysis Resource (WC-HHEAR) at New York University. WC-HHEAR developed an analytical method for multiple chemical measurements that include both current use and emerging chemicals of concern based on laboratory capabilities as well as the biomonitoring recommendations of our prior publication. (13) This analytical method is consistent with Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) methods and was previously validated and applied in a convenience sample of 21 adult nonpregnant volunteers from Albany, NY. (14−16) Ours is the first population-based study to apply this method and the first among a diverse pregnant population. Chemical groups, parent compounds, CAS registry numbers, and environmental transformation of included analytes are provided in Data File S1, Supporting Information 2.
Briefly, urine samples were analyzed at WC-HHEAR using solid-phase extraction (SPE) coupled with high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) (14) Urine samples (0.5 mL) were incubated with β-glucuronidase/arylsulfatase (2000 units) and subjected to ABS Elut NEXUS SPE (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA) prior to analysis by HPLC-MS/MS. A Sciex HPLC system (SCIEX, Redwood City, CA) interfaced with an ABSCIEX QTRAP 5500+ triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) with an electrospray ionization source was used in the analysis. The optimal LC-MS/MS conditions and quality assurance protocols are described in detail elsewhere. (14) Limits of detection (LODs) are presented in Data File S2, Supporting Information 2. Due to insufficient resolution to quantify 24 chemicals individually, we quantified 10 composites of multiple chemicals (e.g., we quantified a composite of 1-hydroxyphenanthrene, 2-hydroxyphenanthrene, 3-hydroxyphenanthrene, 4-hydroxyphenanthrene, and 9-hydroxyphenanthrene as a single analyte).
In total, we quantified 89 analytes in nine chemical groups: 79 individual and 10 composite analytes. These 89 analytes are biomarkers of 103 chemicals measured as either parent compounds or metabolites in urine depending on whether metabolites were known and analytical standards were available (Table S2, Supporting Information 1). To simplify reporting for metabolites of three parent phthalates and the phthalate alternative plasticizer DINCH, we calculated molar sums of metabolites for di-2-ethylhexyl phthalate (DEHP), di-isodecyl phthalate (DiDP), di-(2-propylheptyl) phthalate (DPHP), and di-iso-nonyl-cyclohexane-1,2-dicarboxylic acid (DINCH) (details in Data File S2, Supporting Information 2). (17,18)

Quality Control

We determined the replicability of the biomarker analysis using quality control (QC) pools and blinded duplicates. (15) Prior to this study, HHEAR collected urine from healthy adult volunteers and created two QC pools: QC Pools A and B. (15) Three aliquots each of these QC pools were run in each of the two batches (i.e., up to six QC-pooled urine samples from each of Pool A and Pool B). We calculated the overall means and coefficients of variation (CVs) for each biomarker in each pooled sample. We also analyzed 34 blinded duplicate pairs of urine sample aliquots from six cohorts and calculated the relative percent differences (RPDs) for each pair and the median of all pair RPDs. We restricted calculations of CVs to QC-pooled samples with concentrations above the LOD. We restricted calculations of RPDs to duplicate pairs, where both concentrations were >LOD and only assessed analytes with at least two sets of duplicate pairs >LOD; therefore, the median RPDs of duplicate pairs for several analytes were based on a small number of duplicates. We did not calculate CVs or RPDs for 16 analytes that were not detected in any study participant. The laboratory QC pool CVs were calculated for 32 analytes and ranged from 1 to 16%, with 91% of QC pools having a CV <10% (Table S3, Supporting Information 1). RPDs for 34 duplicate pairs from six cohorts could be calculated for 59 analytes and ranged from 7.3% (benzophenone-2) to 82.1% (imidacloprid) (Table S3, Supporting Information 1). Fifty analytes (68%) had a median RPD <50%, whereas 38 (52%) had median RPDs <30% (Table S3, Supporting Information 1).

Covariates

Sociodemographic variables included participant age (years; continuous), race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic White; non-Hispanic Black, non-Hispanic other, or non-Hispanic multiple race; Hispanic ethnicity, any race), prepregnancy or early pregnancy body mass index (BMI, measured from preconception to 16 completed weeks of gestation; continuous), highest educational attainment (high school diploma, general educational development [GED], or less; some college, Associate’s degree, or trade/vocational school; Bachelor’s degree or higher), and marital status (single, separated, divorced, widowed; married or partnered and living together). We assessed California residence since three of nine cohorts were located in California. We assessed tobacco exposure during pregnancy using log2-transformed creatinine-adjusted urinary cotinine concentrations (ng/mL). Urine specimen collection characteristics included time of day (morning [2:00 am–9:59 am], midday [10:00 am–3:59 pm], evening [4:00 pm–10:00 pm]), trimester (first, second, or third), calendar season (autumn [September–November], winter [December–February], spring [March–May], summer [June–August]), and year of collection (continuous; centered at 2008).

Statistical Analysis

Descriptive Statistics

We calculated the mean (SD) or geometric mean (GSD) of continuous variables and sample size (%) of categorical variables for characteristics of pregnant women in our sample. We also calculated descriptive statistics of demographic characteristics of all pregnant women in the nine participating cohorts. For each urinary analyte, we calculated the detection frequency, geometric mean (GSD), minimum and maximum, and 25th, 50th, and 75th percentiles. Sixteen analytes were not detected in any sample and excluded from further analyses (Data File S2, Supporting Information 2). We analyzed values as either dichotomous or continuous depending on the detection frequency among the participants. For analytes detected in <70% of participants, we created dichotomous variables based on each analyte’s LOD and modeled the analytes as below or above the detection limit. (19) For analytes detected in ≥70% of participants, we used machine-read values (if available) or replaced values below the LOD with the analyte LOD/√2 (20) and calculated log2-transformed concentrations. For six machine-read concentrations reported as zero, we added a small value (0.0001) prior to log2-transformation. Lastly, we calculated Spearman’s correlations for analytes detected in at least three cohorts and ≥70% of the population.

Predictors of Chemical Exposures

We estimated univariable associations of sociodemographic and urine specimen collection characteristics with creatinine-adjusted analyte concentrations using generalized estimating equations to account for clustering of samples at the cohort level. We assumed an exchangeable working correlation matrix and used robust Huber–White sandwich estimation of variance and standard errors. For continuous concentrations, we first accounted for urinary dilution (21,22) by calculating creatinine-adjusted analyte concentrations as , where we multiplied observed analyte concentrations (Eobserved) by the ratio of the cohort-specific median creatinine concentration (Crcohort median) and sample-specific creatinine concentration (Crobserved). (23,24) Then, we modeled creatinine-adjusted concentrations using an identity link and Gaussian family and reported effect estimates as % differences and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). For dichotomized concentrations, we used a log-link and Poisson family and reported prevalence ratios (PRs) and 95% CIs. To reduce the influence of individual cohorts and the potential for nonpositivity problems, we conducted predictor analyses only for analytes detected in participants from at least three cohorts and at least 10% of the overall study sample.
As a sensitivity analysis, we conducted limited multivariable models including age (continuous), race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic White; non-Hispanic Black, non-Hispanic other, or non-Hispanic multiple race; Hispanic ethnicity, any race), and educational attainment (high school diploma, GED, or less; some college, Associate’s degree, or trade/vocational school; Bachelor’s degree or higher). We used a complete-case approach for all analyses and did not report cell sizes less than five. We conducted statistical analyses using Stata v16.1 (StataCorp, College Station, Texas) and R v4.02 Statistical Software (Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).

Results

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Participant Demographics

Participants averaged 29.5 years of age at the time of urine collection were predominantly non-Hispanic White (34%) or Hispanic (40%) and married or living with a partner (68%) (Table 1). Urine specimens were collected during all trimesters and seasons, and the majority were collected from 2017 to 2020 (77%) (Table 1). Most of the urine specimens were spot samples (92%), were collected between 10:00 am and 3:59 pm (69%), and had undergone only 1 freeze–thaw cycle prior to assay (82%) (Table 1). The average age at delivery, educational attainment, and pre- or early pregnancy BMI were similar among our sample and all pregnant people from the nine participating cohorts (N = 7420) (Table S4, Supporting Information 1). Slightly fewer of our participants were non-Hispanic White and married or living with a partner (Table S4, Supporting Information 1).
Table 1. Demographic and Urine Specimen Collection Characteristics of 171 Pregnant Women in ECHOa,b
demographic characteristicsN (%)
age at specimen collection (years); mean (SD)29.5 (5.3)
age category at specimen collection (years) 
<2535 (20)
25 to <3051 (30)
30 to <3547 (28)
≥ 3538 (22)
race/ethnicity (missing: n = 1) 
non-Hispanic White57 (34)
non-Hispanic Black/African American34 (20)
non-Hispanic other or multiple race11 (6)
Hispanic68 (40)
highest educational attainment (missing: n = 7) 
less than high school16 (10)
high school degree, GED, or equivalent28 (17)
some college, Associate’s degree, or trade/vocational school45 (27)
Bachelor’s degree36 (22)
Master’s, professional, or doctorate degree39 (24)
marital status (missing: n = 6) 
single, partnered, not living together45 (27)
widowed, separated, divorced8 (5)
married or living with a partner112 (68)
prepregnancy or early pregnancy BMI (kg/m2); mean (SD); (missing: n = 12)26.4 (6.5)
California residence54 (32)
urine cotinine concentration, creatinine-standardized (ng/mL); geometric mean (GSD)0.57 (6.2)
urine specimen collection characteristics 
creatinine (mg/dL); geometric mean (GSD)61.4 (1.7)
time of day (missing: n = 9) 
morning (2:00 am–9:59 am)40 (25)
midday (10:00 am–3:59 pm)112 (69)
evening (4:00 pm–10:00 pm)10 (6)
trimester (missing: n = 2) 
1 (0–13 completed weeks)19 (11)
2 (14–26 completed weeks)82 (49)
3 (27+ completed weeks)68 (40)
calendar season 
winter (december–february)37 (22)
spring (march–may)39 (23)
summer (june–august)52 (30)
autumn (september–november)43 (25)
calendar year 
2008–201519 (11)
201620 (12)
201740 (23)
201846 (27)
2019–202043 (25)
collection type (missing: n = 3) 
spot154 (92)
first morning void14 (8)
freeze–thaw cycles 
1140 (82)
231 (18)
a

All statistics are sample size (%) unless noted otherwise.

b

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; dL, deciliter; ECHO, Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes; GED, general educational development; GSD, geometric standard deviation; kg, kilogram; m, meter; mg, milligram; mL, milliliter; ng, nanogram; and SD, standard deviation.

Analyte Concentrations and Correlations

We detected 73 of the 89 analytes (63 of 79 individuals and 10 of 10 composites) in at least one participant (Table 2, Figure S1, Supporting Information 1). Of these, 36 analytes (31 individuals and 5 composites) were detected in greater than 50% of participants: 3 benzophenones, 2 bisphenols, 4 fungicides and herbicides, 3 insecticides, 2 OPEs, 3 parabens, 16 phthalates/alternative plasticizers (14 individuals and 2 composites), and 4 PAHs (1 individual and 3 composites) (Table 2). Nine of these 36 analytes are not currently included in NHANES biomonitoring: 4-hydroxybenzophenone (4-OHBP), benzophenone-1 (BP1), thiamethoxam (THX), cyclohexane-1,2-dicarboxylic acid-mono(oxo-isononyl) ester (MONCH), composite of mono-2-(carboxymethyl) hexyl phthalate and mono(7 carboxyheptyl) phthalate (MCMHP/MCHPP), mono-2-(propyl-6-carboxy-hexyl) phthalate (MPCHP), mono-2-(propyl-6-oxoheptyl) phthalate (MPOHP), monocarboxy isooctyl phthalate (MCiOP), and monohydroxy-iso-decyl phthalate (MHiDP) (Data File S2, Supporting Information 2). Notably, 19 analytes (17 individuals and 2 composites) were detected in ≥90% of the population, indicating ubiquitous exposure (Table 2). Analytes not detected in any sample included benzophenone-6, bisphenol AP, four fungicides and herbicides, four insecticides, three OPEs, heptyl paraben, and two phthalate metabolites (Data File S2, Supporting Information 2).
Table 2. Analyte Descriptive Statistics among 171 Pregnant Women in ECHO, Categorized by Prior Inclusion in National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) Biomonitoringa,c
previously not included in NHANESpreviously included in NHANES
chemical group/analyte name (abbrevLODN (%) >LODGMP25P75chemical group/analyte name (abbrev)LODN (%) >LODGMP25P75
bactericide           
      triclocarban (TCS)0.141 (24)<LOD<LOD<LOD
benzophenones           
2,2′,4,4′-tetrahydroxyenzophenone (BP2)0.07513 (8)<LOD<LOD0.56benzophenone-3 (BP3)b0.1167 (98)3.10.968.9
2,2′-dihydroxymethoxybenzophenone (BP8)0.07570 (41)<LOD<LOD1152      
4-hydroxybenzophenone (4-OHBP)0.075152 (89)0.290.130.53      
benzophenone-1 (BP1)b0.075166 (97)1.80.486.0      
bisphenols           
bisphenol AF (BPAF)0.029 (5)<LOD<LOD<LODbisphenol A (BPA)0.07105 (61)0.28<LOD1.1
bisphenol B (BPB)0.18 (5)<LOD<LOD<LODbisphenol F (BPF)0.268 (40)0.26<LOD0.65
bisphenol Z (BPZ)0.0524 (14)<LOD<LOD<LODbisphenol S (BPS)0.05144 (84)0.200.0880.49
fungicides and herbicides           
fungicides     fungicides     
metalaxyl (MET)0.075n < 5<LOD<LOD<LOD2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4,5-T)0.05148 (87)0.170.0940.33
pyrimethanil (PYRM)0.1n < 5<LOD<LOD<LOD4-nitrophenol (PNP)0.1118 (69)0.26<LOD0.58
      pentachlorophenol (PCP)0.2110 (64)0.59<LOD2.0
      herbicides     
      2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D)0.07531 (18)0.081<LOD<LOD
      atrazine (ATZ)0.02586 (50)0.037<LOD0.089
insecticides           
neonicotinoid insecticides     neonicotinoid insecticides     
6-chloronicotinic acid (6-CNA)0.1517 (10)<LOD<LOD<LODacetamiprid (ACE)0.02515 (9)<LOD<LOD<LOD
nitenpyram (NIT)0.0540 (23)<LOD<LOD<LODclothianidin (CLO)0.148 (28)<LOD<LOD0.15
thiamethoxam (THX)b0.05157 (92)0.420.250.82imidacloprid (IMI)0.148 (28)0.11<LOD0.13
other insecticides     N-desmethyl-acetamiprid (NDMA)b0.03164 (96)0.330.220.59
sulfoxaflor (SUF)0.0133 (19)<LOD<LOD<LODorganochlorine insecticides     
      composite of 2,4,5- and 2,4,6-trichlorophenol (2,4,5-/2,4,6-TCP)0.2n < 5<LOD<LOD<LOD
      organophosphate insecticides     
      3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinol (TCP)b0.1154 (90)0.50.251.1
      pyrethroid insecticides     
      composite of cis and trans-3-(2,2-di-chlorovinyl)-2,2-dimethyl-cyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (DCCA)0.469 (40)  1.2
      3-phenoxybenzoic acid (PBA)0.716 (9)  <LOD
      4-fluoro-3-phenoxybenzoic acid (FPBA)0.02541 (24)  <LOD
organophosphate ester flame retardants           
triethyl phosphate (TEP)0.07573 (43)<LOD<LOD0.13bis(1,3-dichloro-2-propyl) phosphate (BDCIPP)0.15126 (74)0.39<LOD0.87
composite of tri-n-butyl phosphate/tri-iso-butyl phosphate (TnBP/TiBP)0.07545 (26)0.11<LOD0.36composite of di-n-butyl phosphate and di-isobutyl phosphate (DBuP/DiBP)0.0510 (6)<LOD<LOD<LOD
 0.26 (4)<LOD<LOD<LODdiphenyl phosphate (DPHP)b0.05164 (96)0.660.341.4
parabens           
benzyl paraben (BzPB)0.0520 (12)<LOD<LOD<LODbutyl paraben (BuPB)0.0551 (30)0.082<LOD0.096
      ethyl paraben (EtPB)b0.01164 (96)0.430.0941.6
      methyl paraben (MePB)b0.05168 (98)113.152
      propyl paraben (PrPB)0.15150 (88)2.80.5216
phthalates and phthalate alternatives           
phthalate alternatives     phthalate alternatives     
cyclohexane-1,2-dicarboxylic acid-mono(oxo-isononyl) ester (MONCH)0.025108 (63)0.11<LOD0.33cyclohexane-1,2-dicarboxylic acid-monocarboxy isooctyl ester (MCOCH)0.025108 (63)0.11<LOD0.33
monobenzyl terephthalate (MBzTP)0.075n <5<LOD<LOD<LODcyclohexane-1,2-dicarboxyclic acid-mono(hydroxy-isononyl) ester (MHNCH)0.05131 (77)0.280.0560.9
monoethyl terephthalate (METP)0.155 (3)<LOD<LOD<LOD      
mono-tert-butyl terephthalate (MTBTP)0.0757 (4)<LOD<LOD<LOD      
phthalates     phthalates     
composite of mono-2-(carboxymethyl) hexyl phthalate and mono(7 carboxyheptyl) phthalate (MCMHP/MCHPP)0.1152 (89)0.530.311.0mono (2-ethyl-5-hydroxyhexyl) phthalate (MEHHP)b0.2170 (99)3.82.17.3
mono-2-heptyl phthalate (MHPP)0.0841 (24)<LOD<LOD<LODmono (2-ethyl-5-oxohexyl) phthalate (MEOHP)b0.05166 (97)3.21.96.7
mono-2-(propyl-6-carboxy-hexyl) phthalate (MPCHP)b0.05159 (93)0.40.190.78mono (5-carboxy-2-ethylpentyl) phthalate (MECPP)b0.05170 (99)5.02.79.4
mono-2-(propyl-6-hydroxy-heptyl) phthalate (MPHHP)0.02544 (26)0.048<LOD0.043mono (7-COOH-2-methyloctyl) phthalate (MCOMOP)0.025117 (68)0.15<LOD0.57
mono-2-(propyl-6-oxoheptyl) phthalate (MPOHP)0.075139 (81)0.460.141.1monobenzyl phthalate (MBzP)0.452 (30)0.96<LOD6.0
monocarboxy isooctyl phthalate (MCiOP)b0.05169 (99)3.01.37.3monocarboxy isononyl phthalate (MCiNP)b0.05158 (92)0.370.180.69
monohydroxy-iso-decyl phthalate (MHiDP)b0.05159 (93)0.590.241.1monoethylhexyl phthalate (MEHP)b0.1164 (96)1.60.763.5
composite of mono-isopropyl phthalate and mono-propyl phthalate (MiPP/MPrP)0.182 (48)0.11<LOD0.25monoethyl phthalate (MEP)b0.2171 (100)241058
mono-pentyl phthalate (MPeP)0.116 (9)<LOD<LOD<LODmonomethyl phthalate (MMP)0.1105 (61)0.38<LOD1.1
      composite of mono-n-butyl phthalate and mono-isobutyl phthalate (MnBP/MiBP)b0.05171 (100)116.022
      mono-n-octyl phthalate (MOP)0.1575 (44)0.17<LOD0.33
polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons           
      composite of 1- and 2 hydroxynaphthalene (NAPs)b50169 (99)5443218414480
      1-hydroxypyrene (1-OHP)10012 (7)<LOD<LOD<LOD
      composite of 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, 9-hydroxyphenanthrene (PHENs)75114 (67)145<LOD314
      composite of 2-, 3-, 9-hydroxyfluorene (FLUOs)50118 (69)110<LOD210
a

Concentration units are ng/mL except for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (ng/L). Values below the limit of detection (LOD) were set to LOD/√2 unless machine-read values were provided.

b

Detected in at least 90% of urine specimens.

c

Abbreviations: GM, geometric mean; L, liter; LOD, limit of detection; mL, milliliter; ng, nanogram; and P, percentile.

We observed several moderate-to-strong positive correlations and few negative correlations among analytes (Figure 1). In general, correlations were stronger within each chemical group (Figure 1). While most phthalate metabolites were moderate to highly correlated with one another (range: 0.14–0.68), correlations of phthalate metabolites with ∑DINCH (a nonphthalate plasticizer used as a replacement for phthalates, such as DEHP) were low (range: 0.08–0.21).

Figure 1

Figure 1. Spearman correlation heat map of urinary analyte concentrations measured among 171 pregnant women in ECHO. It includes analytes detected in at least three cohorts and ≥70% of the overall study sample. Values below the limit of detection (LOD) were set to LOD/√2 unless machine-read values were provided. Bold indicates analytes not previously included in NHANES biomonitoring. Boxes indicate within class correlations.

Predictors of Analyte Concentrations

We found higher detection frequencies or concentrations among those identifying as non-Hispanic Black, other, multiple race, or Hispanic ethnicity (n = 30 analytes); having lower educational attainment (n = 22 analytes); being unmarried/partnered (n = 11 analytes); and having higher urinary cotinine concentrations (n = 12 analytes) (Figure 2, Data File S3, Supporting Information 2). Hispanic ethnicity was associated with higher detection frequencies or concentrations of most analytes not included in NHANES biomonitoring (Figure 2). For example, compared with non-Hispanic White women, Hispanic women had a 6.9 (95% CI: 1.1, 43.4) higher prevalence of bisphenol Z (BPZ) detection and a 58% (95% CI: 10, 126%) higher THX concentration (Data File S3, Supporting Information 2). In contrast, identifying as non-Hispanic Black, other, or multiple race (n = 11); having lower educational attainment (n = 14); and being unmarried/partnered (n = 6) were associated with lower detection frequencies or concentrations of other analytes such as BP1 (Figure 2, Data File S3, Supporting Information 2). We observed some notable differences in predictor associations for certain chemicals versus their increasingly utilized replacements. For example, Hispanic women had higher BPS and BPZ concentrations compared with non-Hispanic White women, whereas BPA was not associated with race or ethnicity (Data File S3, Supporting Information 2). For phthalates, Hispanic ethnicity was associated with higher concentrations of both ∑DEHP and ∑DINCH, but the magnitude was much greater for ∑DINCH: compared with non-Hispanic White women, ∑DEHP concentrations were 31% (95% CI: 7%, 61%) higher among Hispanic women, whereas ∑DINCH concentrations were 122% (95% CI: 52%, 226%) higher (Data File S3, Supporting Information 2).

Figure 2

Figure 2. Univariable associations of maternal sociodemographic and specimen collection characteristics with creatinine-adjusted analyte concentrations. Bold indicates analytes not previously included in NHANES biomonitoring. OP, organophosphate; OPE, organophosphate ester; and PAH, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon.

Morning specimen collection; first-trimester collection; and collection during spring, summer, or autumn months were associated with higher detection frequencies or concentrations of several analytes (Data File S4, Supporting Information 2). Among analytes not included in NHANES biomonitoring, later years of specimen collection were significantly associated (p < 0.05) with lower detection frequencies of benzophenone-8 (BP8), nitenpyram, mono-2-heptyl phthalate (MHPP), the composite of mono-isopropyl phthalate (MiPP) and mono-propyl phthalate (MPrP), and 4-OHBP (Figure 2). For example, each year of specimen collection was associated with lower prevalence of MHPP detection (PR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.79, 0.89) and lower 4-OHBP concentrations (% difference: -7%; 95% CI: −13%, −1%) (Data File S4, Supporting Information 2).
Notably, chemicals often had the opposite direction of association with year of specimen collection compared with their chemical replacements (Data File S4, Supporting Information 2). Later year of specimen collection was not associated with prevalence of BPA detection (PR: 1.0; 95% CI: 0.9, 1.1) but was associated with higher prevalence of bisphenol F (BPF) detection (PR: 1.3; 95% CI: 1.1, 1.5) and higher BPS concentrations (% difference: 18%; 95% CI: 5%, 32%) (Data File S4, Supporting Information 2). For phthalates, later year of specimen collection was associated with 12% (95% CI: −19%, −4%) lower ∑DEHP metabolite concentrations but 23% (95% CI: 13%, 33%) higher ∑DINCH metabolite concentrations (Data File S4, Supporting Information 2).
In our sensitivity analysis using multivariable models, magnitudes of association for age, race/ethnicity, and educational attainment were generally comparable to unadjusted associations though some associations became weaker (Data File S5, Supporting Information 2).

Discussion

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

To our knowledge, this is the largest study to measure >100 contemporary and emerging chemicals in a diverse population of pregnant women in the U.S. Overall, 73 of 89 analytes were detected in at least one pregnant woman, including 30 from seven chemical groups that were not previously included in NHANES. Additionally, 19 analytes were detectable in 90–100% of pregnant women, including 2 benzophenones, 3 insecticides, 1 OPE, 2 parabens, 10 phthalate metabolites, and 1 PAH. Our study adds to the growing literature documenting multiple chemical exposures that occur during pregnancy, a critical and vulnerable period of human development. (4,5)
This analysis is based on a multiyear effort to identify priority chemicals for biomonitoring in the ECHO Program. Previously, ECHO investigators recommended novel chemicals for biomonitoring based on three criteria: (1) prevalence in environmental or human biospecimens, (2) preliminary evidence of their toxicity for health outcomes of interest to ECHO (i.e., adverse perinatal outcomes, neurodevelopmental outcomes, respiratory outcomes, and obesity/diabetes), and (3) a biomarker was reported for measurement in human biospecimens. (13) In this initial study, we measured eight biomarkers of chemicals not included in NHANES that were identified in our prioritization of novel chemicals: (13) bisphenol AF (BPAF), bisphenol B (BPB), azoxystrobin, cyprodinil, metalaxyl, pyrimethanil, tebuconazole, and tetraconazole. Although these eight chemicals were infrequently or not detected in our sample, six were pesticides measured as the parent compounds and not the anticipated metabolites that would be present in urine because some pesticide metabolite standards were not available for our study. We recommend future studies measure the parent compounds in plasma or hair to assess exposure if standards for the metabolites remain unavailable. We also measured 41 analytes that were included on the list for future prioritization (Data File S1, Supporting Information 2), many of which needed biomarker development or demonstration of human exposure. (13) Of these 41 analytes, 35 were detected in at least one sample and 21 were detected in >50% of samples suggesting widespread exposures (Data File S2, Supporting Information 2).
Nine analytes detected in more than half of our samples are not currently included in NHANES biomonitoring, including the neonicotinoid pesticide thiamethoxam (92%), the benzophenones 4-OHBP (89%) and BP1 (97%), and metabolites of the phthalate DPHP (MPCHP/MPOHP, 89%). We also measured additional metabolites of the phthalate alternative plasticizer DINCH (MONCH) and the phthalates DEHP (composite of MCMHP/MCHPP) and DiDP (MCiOP and MHiDP) that may help to characterize exposures to these parent compounds in addition to metabolites already included in NHANES. In addition, our method included 44 analytes currently measured in NHANES, many of which have been identified by authoritative bodies as likely or known carcinogens or as developmental or reproductive toxicants. (25−35) NHANES does not oversample pregnant participants, and chemical classes are measured in biospecimens from nonoverlapping random subsamples of NHANES participants. Therefore, our novel findings demonstrate substantial coexposure to multiple contemporary chemicals across nine chemical groups in a large number of pregnant women.
We observed neonicotinoid insecticides were highly detected (six detected and thiamethoxam and N-desmethyl-acetamiprid in more than 90%), increasing temporally, and generally more highly detected among Hispanic women. Four of these neonicotinoids have been previously measured in NHANES. We found generally higher detection frequencies and concentrations compared with the four measured in NHANES (collection period 2015–2016). (36) This may, in part, be due to our later study collection period (primarily 2017–2020). The most frequently detected neonicotinoid in NHANES was N-desmethyl-acetamiprid (35% overall, 38% in females), (36) which we detected in 96% of our participants. While this difference in detection frequencies is expected due to a higher LOD in NHANES (0.2 ng/mL) compared with this method (0.03 ng/mL), our participants also appear to have higher exposures. For example, our 75th percentile for N-desmethyl-acetamiprid was 0.59 ng/mL compared with 0.36 ng/mL in NHANES. We also found more universal detection of several neonicotinoids with no or low detection frequencies (<10%) in NHANES. (36) Finally, we found higher concentrations or detection frequencies in later years of collection for several neonicotinoids (acetamiprid and clothianidin), which have been increasingly used in the U.S. as a replacement for organophosphate pesticides and other pyrethroids. (36,37) Neonicotinoids are used in a variety of applications, including agricultural uses, (38−41) flea control in pets, (42) and residential landscaping pest control. (43,44) In agricultural settings, neonicotinoids are primarily used as seed treatments and readily taken up by the plant leading to their presence in all components of the plant (e.g., roots, stems, flowers, and leaves) and cannot be washed off; thus, food has been identified as an important source of exposure. (45,46)
We also documented widespread detection of several chemicals that are replacements for chemicals with declining use due to regulatory or market-based activities. For example, we found higher concentrations in the later calendar years for BPA replacements (BPF and BPS) and phthalate alternatives (DINCH metabolites). Concurrently, we found an indication of decreasing or stable levels of certain chemicals that have been the focus of bans and market-based campaigns to reduce their use in consumer products, such as certain phthalates, some parabens and benzophenones, and BPA. (47−50) Notably, geometric mean levels of BPS and BPF were similar to BPA, and BPS was more frequently detected (84%) than BPA (61%). These exposures may be cases of “regrettable substitution” given bisphenols are structurally homologous and may have similar hormonal activity and endocrine-disrupting effects to BPA. (9,51,52) Similarly, the alternative plasticizer DINCH is being used as a replacement for DEHP and other high-molecular-weight phthalates. (53−56) We also observed widespread exposures to OPEs, which may have adverse reproductive and child development outcomes (57) and have been increasing in use as a replacement for polybrominated diphenyl ether (PBDE) flame-retardant chemicals. PBDEs have been banned and/or phased out due to concerns about bioaccumulation, long half-lives, and toxicity since the early 2000s, leading to increased use of replacement OPE flame retardants in fabric, electronics, and other consumer product materials. (58,59) More recently, OPEs have been used as phthalate replacements in nail polish and perfumes. (60,61) One potential reason for increases in exposure to replacements is the lack of a legal requirement in the U.S. to provide a minimum set of data on the potential health harms of chemicals currently on the market, such as in Europe. (62)
We identified demographic differences in several exposures, with Hispanic ethnicity being associated with higher concentrations of multiple pesticides, phthalates, bisphenols, and parabens, consistent with prior evidence that chemical exposures (including certain phthalates, pesticides, and phenols) are frequently higher among women of color. (63−65) Racial and ethnic differences in diet and consumer product use, due in part to structural racism, may contribute to these disparities. (66−69) Many chemicals associated with race and ethnicity were also observed to be higher among women with lower educational attainment (high school or less). Our multivariable modeling results suggest race and ethnicity remain important predictors after accounting for age and education. Still, these associations may be partly explained by features of our sample or cohort geography as some cohorts have a higher percentage of certain racial/ethnic participants and the sample size was modest from individual cohorts. An important limitation of our study is the lack of consideration of country or region of origin, acculturation, and immigration status for women identifying as Hispanic ethnicity. Given the wide geographic range of our study, grouping all Hispanic women together obfuscates the potential for notable differences in chemical exposures occurring within this diverse group of pregnant women. Prioritizing opportunities to collect and incorporate the necessary data to fully characterize and understand differences among unique racial and ethnic groups will be critical for future research, especially as we expand chemical biomonitoring to additional ECHO participants.
We evaluated chemicals from a wide range of uses and applications, including agricultural and home use pesticides, personal care products, and multiple plastic-related applications, including food packaging materials, home construction materials, home use products, and furniture- and foam-related materials. (13) As such, people come into contact with these chemicals via air, food, drinking water, and dermal contact. (11,13,70−73) Many of these chemicals migrate from their original source and have been found in intermediary exposure media, such as dust, often at higher concentrations, supporting their use as an important source of exposure monitoring. (74,75) In addition, we observed higher concentrations of some parabens, phthalates, and pesticides in summer and spring compared with winter, which could be due to seasonal variation in exposure sources, such as personal care product use, diet, or time spent indoors.
A major strength of our study is the rigorous, literature-based approach we used to identify candidate chemicals, many not included in NHANES biomonitoring. (13) We simultaneously quantified compounds from multiple chemical groups that have not been previously included together in prior studies, including fungicides and herbicides, OPEs, parabens, and emerging phthalate and alternative plasticizers. We used a validated, high-throughput method to simultaneously quantify concentrations of analytes in multiple chemical groups using a small volume of urine (<1 mL), which will facilitate larger future ECHO studies. Additionally, we included cohorts with diverse sociodemographic characteristics and broad geographical coverage and assessed associations with a variety of demographic and specimen characteristics to identify potentially vulnerable populations and inform the design of future studies.
Because our study focused on urinary analytes, we did not include compounds such as perfluoroalkyl substances, PBDEs, and polychlorinated biphenyls, which have been previously documented to have widespread exposures among pregnant women and the general U.S. population. (11,76) Some RPDs of duplicate pairs were high, which may reflect a lack of sample homogeneity or analytical variance. Many of the analytes had CVs <30%, similar to our prior methods paper, (14) and higher RPDs may suggest sample inhomogeneity. Because of limited power, we were unable to fully assess independent predictors in multivariable analyses, and we did not have information on specific sources of exposure, such as diet or personal care product use. While urine is the preferred biological matrix for measurement of nonpersistent chemicals, (77) a limitation of our study design for evaluating predictors of exposure is the measurement of analytes in a single urine sample. Many of these chemicals are rapidly metabolized and eliminated in urine with short biological half-lives and/or are better measured in serum or hair. Future ECHO studies will measure analytes in repeated samples during pregnancy to assess intraindividual variability and include a sufficient sample size to reduce exposure measurement error for studies of predictors and health outcomes.
Our study sample was similar to participants of the parent ECHO cohorts with respect to several sociodemographic characteristics. Although our sample may not be fully representative of the U.S. population, we were able to assess exposures within diverse racial, ethnic, geographic, and socioeconomic subgroups. While we were unable to evaluate the potential health risks of these exposures given the pilot nature of our study, our results both document widespread exposures during pregnancy across the U.S. and demonstrate the feasibility of this multiclass assay. Our findings provide a foundation for a larger ECHO study to evaluate the relationships of these exposures to adverse health outcomes.
Our data support the importance of temporal biomonitoring of multiple chemicals to identify how policies and related activities have successfully reduced exposures, and where future interventions should focus. This study also reinforces the need to identify systematic solutions to avoid potential “regrettable substitutions” and prevent future harmful exposures, including improvements to chemical alternative assessments and approaches that address chemical classes instead of individual chemicals. (7,78,79) Finally, ECHO has collected rich information on exposure sources and health outcomes that can be used to identify potential individual- and policy-level interventions and evaluate the health impacts of these exposures. (11) Illuminating contemporary and emerging chemical exposures during pregnancy is critical to identify common sources of potentially modifiable exposures and inform interventions aimed at exposure reduction on the individual, clinical, and population levels, with implications for maternal, child, and lifelong health.

Supporting Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.1c08942.

  • Additional descriptive information and quality control analysis results (PDF)

  • Additional chemical information and statistical analysis results (XLSX)

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

  • Corresponding Author
    • Tracey J. Woodruff - Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences and the Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143, United StatesOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3622-1297 Email: [email protected]
  • Authors
    • Jessie P. Buckley - Department of Environmental Health and Engineering, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, United StatesOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-7976-0157
    • Jordan R. Kuiper - Department of Environmental Health and Engineering, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, United States
    • Deborah H. Bennett - Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California Davis, Davis, California 95616, United StatesOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6698-2316
    • Emily S. Barrett - Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Rutgers School of Public Health, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854, United States
    • Tracy Bastain - Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90032, United States
    • Carrie V. Breton - Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90032, United States
    • Sridhar Chinthakindi - Department of Pediatrics and Department of Environmental Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York 10016, United States
    • Anne L. Dunlop - Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, United States
    • Shohreh F. Farzan - Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90032, United States
    • Julie B. Herbstman - Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Columbia, New York, NY 10032, United States
    • Margaret R. Karagas - Department of Epidemiology, Dartmouth Geisel School of Medicine, Lebanon, New Hampshire 03756, United States
    • Carmen J. Marsit - Department of Environmental Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, United StatesOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4566-150X
    • John D. Meeker - Department of Environmental Health Sciences, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States
    • Rachel Morello-Frosch - Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management and School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley California 94720, United States
    • Thomas G. O’Connor - Department of Psychiatry, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14627, United States
    • Megan E. Romano - Department of Epidemiology, Dartmouth Geisel School of Medicine, Lebanon, New Hampshire 03756, United States
    • Susan Schantz - Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801, United States
    • Rebecca J. Schmidt - Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California Davis, Davis, California 95616, United States
    • Deborah J. Watkins - Department of Environmental Health Sciences, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States
    • Hongkai Zhu - Department of Pediatrics and Department of Environmental Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York 10016, United States
    • Edo D. Pellizzari - RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709, United States
    • Kurunthachalam Kannan - Department of Pediatrics and Department of Environmental Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York 10016, United StatesOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-1926-7456
  • Funding

    Research reported in this publication was supported by the Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) program, Office of The Director, National Institutes of Health, under Award Numbers U2COD023375 (Coordinating Center), U24OD023382 (Data Analysis Center), U24OD023319 (PRO Core), U2CES026542 (HHEAR), and UH3OD023251, UH3OD023272, UH3OD023275, UH3OD023287, UH3OD023290, UH3OD023318, UH3OD023342, UH3OD023349, UH3OD023347, UH3OD023365 (cohort grantees).

  • Notes
    The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
    The authors declare no competing financial interest.

    The data sets for this manuscript are not publicly available because, per the NIH-approved ECHO Data Sharing Policy, ECHO-wide data have not yet been made available to the public for review/analysis. Requests to access the data sets should be directed to the ECHO Data Analysis Center, [email protected].

Acknowledgments

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The authors wish to thank our ECHO colleagues, the medical, nursing, and program staff, as well as the children and families participating in the ECHO cohorts. The authors also acknowledge the contribution of the ECHO Coordinating Center: Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina: Smith PB, Newby KL, Benjamin DK.

Abbreviations

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

2,4-D

2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid

2,4,5-T

2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetic acid

4-OHBP

4-hydroxybenzophenone

ATZ

atrazine

BDCIPP

bis(1,3-dichloro-2-propyl) phosphate

BP1

benzophenone-1

BP3

benzophenone-3

BP8

2,2’-dihydroxy-methoxybenzophenone

BPA

bisphenol A

BPF

bisphenol F

BPS

bisphenol S

BPZ

bisphenol Z

BuPB

butyl paraben

BzPB

benzyl paraben

CDC

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

CLO

clothianidin

DCCA

3-(2,-di-chlorovinyl)-2,2-dimethyl-cyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid

∑DEHP

molar sum of di-2-ethylhexyl phthalate metabolites

∑DiDP

molar sum of di-iso-decyl phthalate metabolites

∑DINCH

molar sum of di-iso-nonyl-cyclohexane-1,2-dicarboxylic acid metabolites

∑DPHP

molar sum of di-(2-propylheptyl) phthalate metabolites

DPHP

diphenyl phosphate

ECHO

Environmental influences on Child Health Outcome

EtPB

ethyl paraben

FLUOs

composite of 2-, 3-, and 9-hydroxyfluorene

FPBA

4-fluoro-3-phenoxybenzoic acid

IMI

imidacloprid

LOD

limit of detection

MBzP

monobenzyl phthalate

MEP

monoethyl phthalate

MePB

methyl paraben

MHPP

mono-2-heptyl phthalate

MiPP/MPrP

composite of mono-isopropyl phthalate and mono-propyl phthalate

MMP

monomethyl phthalate

MnBP/MiBP

composite of mono-n-butyl phthalate and mono-iso-butyl phthalate

MOP

mono-n-octyl phthalate

NAPs

composite of 1- and 2-hydroxynaphthalene

NDMA

N-desmethyl acetamiprid

NIH

National Institutes of Health

NIT

nitenpyram

NHANES

National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey

PCP

pentachlorophenol

PHENs

composite of 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, and 9-hydroxyphenanthrene

PNP

4-nitrophenol

PrPB

propyl paraben

SUF

sulfoxaflor

TCC

triclocarban

TCP

3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinol

TEP

triethyl phosphate

THX

thiamethoxam

TnBP/TiBP

composite of tri-n-butyl phosphate and tri-iso-butyl phosphate

References

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article references 79 other publications.

  1. 1
    Braun, J. M. Early-life exposure to EDCs: role in childhood obesity and neurodevelopment. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2017, 13, 161173,  DOI: 10.1038/nrendo.2016.186
  2. 2
    Braun, J. M.; Sathyanarayana, S.; Hauser, R. Phthalate exposure and children’s health. Curr. Opin. Pediatr. 2013, 25, 247254,  DOI: 10.1097/MOP.0b013e32835e1eb6
  3. 3
    Dodson, R. E.; Nishioka, M.; Standley, L. J.; Perovich, L. J.; Brody, J. G.; Rudel, R. A. Endocrine disruptors and asthma-associated chemicals in consumer products. Environ. Health Perspect. 2012, 120, 935943,  DOI: 10.1289/ehp.1104052
  4. 4
    Woodruff, T. J.; Zota, A. R.; Schwartz, J. M. Environmental chemicals in pregnant women in the United States: NHANES 2003-2004. Environ. Health Perspect. 2011, 119, 878885,  DOI: 10.1289/ehp.1002727
  5. 5
    Wang, A.; Padula, A.; Sirota, M.; Woodruff, T. J. Environmental influences on reproductive health: the importance of chemical exposures. Fertil. Steril. 2016, 106, 905929,  DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.07.1076
  6. 6
    US EPA TSCA chemical substance inventory www.epa.gov/tsca-inventory (June 1).
  7. 7
    Blum, A.; Behl, M.; Birnbaum, L.; Diamond, M. L.; Phillips, A.; Singla, V.; Sipes, N. S.; Stapleton, H. M.; Venier, M. Organophosphate Ester Flame Retardants: Are They a Regrettable Substitution for Polybrominated Diphenyl Ethers?. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 2019, 6, 638649,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.estlett.9b00582
  8. 8
    National Research Council. Committee on the Design and Evaluation of Safer Chemical Substitutions: A Framework to Inform Government and Industry Decision. Board on Chemical Sciences and Technology; Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology; Division on Earth and Life Studies. In A Framework to Guide Selection of Chemical Alternatives; National Academies Press (US): Washington (DC), 2014.
  9. 9
    Rochester, J. R.; Bolden, A. L.; Bisphenol, S. and F: A Systematic Review and Comparison of the Hormonal Activity of Bisphenol A Substitutes. Environ. Health Perspect. 2015, 123, 643650,  DOI: 10.1289/ehp.1408989
  10. 10
    CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) NHANES 2007-2010 Sampling Methodology Note https://wwwn.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/continuousnhanes/samplingnotes.aspx?BeginYear=2007 (accessed Dec 29, 2021).
  11. 11
    Buckley, J. P.; Barrett, E. S.; Beamer, P. I.; Bennett, D. H.; Bloom, M. S.; Fennell, T. R.; Fry, R. C.; Funk, W. E.; Hamra, G. B.; Hecht, S. S.; Kannan, K.; Iyer, R.; Karagas, M. R.; Lyall, K.; Parsons, P. J.; Pellizzari, E. D.; Signes-Pastor, A. J.; Starling, A. P.; Wang, A.; Watkins, D. J.; Zhang, M.; Woodruff, T. J.; program collaborators for ECHO Opportunities for evaluating chemical exposures and child health in the United States: the Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) Program. J. Exposure Sci. Environ. Epidemiol. 2020, 30, 397419,  DOI: 10.1038/s41370-020-0211-9
  12. 12
    ECHO. Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes: A program supported by the NIH. https://echochildren.org/ (September 27).
  13. 13
    Pellizzari, E. D.; Woodruff, T. J.; Boyles, R. R.; Kannan, K.; Beamer, P. I.; Buckley, J. P.; Wang, A.; Zhu, Y.; Bennett, D. H. Identifying and Prioritizing Chemicals with Uncertain Burden of Exposure: Opportunities for Biomonitoring and Health-Related Research. Environ. Health Perspect. 2019, 127, 126001  DOI: 10.1289/EHP5133
  14. 14
    Zhu, H.; Chinthakindi, S.; Kannan, K. A method for the analysis of 121 multi-class environmental chemicals in urine by high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A 2021, 1646, 462146  DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2021.462146
  15. 15
    Kannan, K.; Stathis, A.; Mazzella, M. J.; Andra, S. S.; Barr, D. B.; Hecht, S. S.; Merrill, L. S.; Galusha, A. L.; Parsons, P. J. Quality assurance and harmonization for targeted biomonitoring measurements of environmental organic chemicals across the Children’s Health Exposure Analysis Resource laboratory network. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 2021, 234, 113741  DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2021.113741
  16. 16
    Barr, D. B.; Silva, M. J.; Kato, K.; Reidy, J. A.; Malek, N. A.; Hurtz, D.; Sadowski, M.; Needham, L. L.; Calafat, A. M. Assessing human exposure to phthalates using monoesters and their oxidized metabolites as biomarkers. Environ. Health Perspect. 2003, 111, 11481151,  DOI: 10.1289/ehp.6074
  17. 17
    Wolff, M. S.; Engel, S. M.; Berkowitz, G. S.; Ye, X.; Silva, M. J.; Zhu, C.; Wetmur, J.; Calafat, A. M. Prenatal phenol and phthalate exposures and birth outcomes. Environ. Health Perspect. 2008, 116, 10921097,  DOI: 10.1289/ehp.11007
  18. 18
    Braun, J. M.; Bellinger, D. C.; Hauser, R.; Wright, R. O.; Chen, A.; Calafat, A. M.; Yolton, K.; Lanphear, B. P. Prenatal phthalate, triclosan, and bisphenol A exposures and child visual-spatial abilities. Neurotoxicology 2017, 58, 7583,  DOI: 10.1016/j.neuro.2016.11.009
  19. 19
    Lubin, J. H.; Colt, J. S.; Camann, D.; Davis, S.; Cerhan, J. R.; Severson, R. K.; Bernstein, L.; Hartge, P. Epidemiologic evaluation of measurement data in the presence of detection limits. Environ. Health Perspect. 2004, 112, 16911696,  DOI: 10.1289/ehp.7199
  20. 20
    Hornung, R. W.; Reed, L. D. Estimation of Average Concentration in the Presence of Nondetectable Values. Appl. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 1990, 5, 4651,  DOI: 10.1080/1047322X.1990.10389587
  21. 21
    Barr, D. B.; Wang, R. Y.; Needham, L. L. Biologic monitoring of exposure to environmental chemicals throughout the life stages: requirements and issues for consideration for the National Children’s Study. Environ. Health Perspect. 2005, 113, 10831091,  DOI: 10.1289/ehp.7617
  22. 22
    O’Brien, K. M.; Upson, K.; Cook, N. R.; Weinberg, C. R. Environmental Chemicals in Urine and Blood: Improving Methods for Creatinine and Lipid Adjustment. Environ. Health Perspect. 2016, 124, 220227,  DOI: 10.1289/ehp.1509693
  23. 23
    Boeniger, M. F.; Lowry, L. K.; Rosenberg, J. Interpretation of urine results used to assess chemical exposure with emphasis on creatinine adjustments: a review. Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J. 1993, 54, 615627,  DOI: 10.1080/15298669391355134
  24. 24
    Kuiper, J. R.; O’Brien, K. M.; Ferguson, K. K.; Buckley, J. P. Urinary specific gravity measures in the U.S. population: Implications for the adjustment of non-persistent chemical urinary biomarker data. Environ. Int. 2021, 156, 106656  DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106656
  25. 25
    Shelby, M. D. NTP-CERHR monograph on the potential human reproductive and developmental effects of di (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) NTP CERHR MON , 2006, 18.
  26. 26
    Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986. Chemicals Known to the State to Cause Cancer or Reproductive Toxicity. March 19, 2021 Proposition 65 List https://oehha.ca.gov/proposition-65/proposition-65-list (accessed Aug 30, 2021).
  27. 27
    European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) Evaluation of New Scientific Evidence Concerning DINP and DIDP: In Relation to Entry 52 of Annex XVII to REACH Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 https://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/31b4067e-de40-4044-93e8-9c9ff1960715 (accessed Aug 30, 2021).
  28. 28
    European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) Inclusion of substances of very high conern in the candidate list (Decision by the Executive Director). https://www.echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/78d8ecfd-5e83-4299-9f16-15681ee11bbb (accessed Aug 30, 2021).
  29. 29
    European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) Substance Infocard: acetamiprid. https://echa.europa.eu/substance-information/-/substanceinfo/100.111.622 (accessed Aug 30, 2021).
  30. 30
    European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) Substance Infocard: 6-chloronicotinic acid. https://echa.europa.eu/substance-information/-/substanceinfo/100.023.819 (accessed Aug 30, 2021).
  31. 31
    European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) Substance Infocard: 2,2’,4,4’-tetrahydroxybenzophenone https://echa.europa.eu/substance-information/-/substanceinfo/100.004.573 (accessed Aug 30, 2021).
  32. 32
    European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) Substance Infocard: 4-hydroxybenzophenone. https://echa.europa.eu/substance-information/-/substanceinfo/100.013.188 (accessed Aug 30, 2021).
  33. 33
    European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) Substance Infocard: Diheptyl phthalate https://echa.europa.eu/substance-information/-/substanceinfo/100.020.806 (accessed Aug 30, 2021).
  34. 34
    European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) Substance Infocard: Dipentyl phthalate. https://echa.europa.eu/substance-information/-/substanceinfo/100.004.563 (accessed Aug 30, 2021).
  35. 35
    Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) Proposition 65 Fact Sheets: Phthalates https://www.p65warnings.ca.gov/fact-sheets/phthalates (accessed Aug 30, 2021).
  36. 36
    Ospina, M.; Wong, L. Y.; Baker, S. E.; Serafim, A. B.; Morales-Agudelo, P.; Calafat, A. M. Exposure to neonicotinoid insecticides in the U.S. general population: Data from the 2015-2016 national health and nutrition examination survey. Environ. Res. 2019, 176, 108555  DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2019.108555
  37. 37
    Casida, J. E. Neonicotinoids and Other Insect Nicotinic Receptor Competitive Modulators: Progress and Prospects. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2018, 63, 125144,  DOI: 10.1146/annurev-ento-020117-043042
  38. 38
    Douglas, M. R.; Tooker, J. F. Large-scale deployment of seed treatments has driven rapid increase in use of neonicotinoid insecticides and preemptive pest management in US field crops. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49, 50885097,  DOI: 10.1021/es506141g
  39. 39
    Jeschke, P.; Nauen, R.; Schindler, M.; Elbert, A. Overview of the status and global strategy for neonicotinoids. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011, 59, 28972908,  DOI: 10.1021/jf101303g
  40. 40
    Simon-Delso, N.; Amaral-Rogers, V.; Belzunces, L. P.; Bonmatin, J. M.; Chagnon, M.; Downs, C.; Furlan, L.; Gibbons, D. W.; Giorio, C.; Girolami, V.; Goulson, D.; Kreutzweiser, D. P.; Krupke, C. H.; Liess, M.; Long, E.; McField, M.; Mineau, P.; Mitchell, E. A.; Morrissey, C. A.; Noome, D. A.; Pisa, L.; Settele, J.; Stark, J. D.; Tapparo, A.; Van Dyck, H.; Van Praagh, J.; Van der Sluijs, J. P.; Whitehorn, P. R.; Wiemers, M. Systemic insecticides (neonicotinoids and fipronil): trends, uses, mode of action and metabolites. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2015, 22, 534,  DOI: 10.1007/s11356-014-3470-y
  41. 41
    Goulson, D. An overview of the environmental risks posed by neonicotinoid insecticides. J. Appl. Ecol. 2013, 50, 977987,  DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.12111
  42. 42
    Tomizawa, M.; Casida, J. E. Neonicotinoid insecticide toxicology: mechanisms of selective action. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2005, 45, 247268,  DOI: 10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.45.120403.095930
  43. 43
    Mach, B. M.; Bondarenko, S.; Potter, D. A. Uptake and dissipation of neonicotinoid residues in nectar and foliage of systemically treated woody landscape plants. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2018, 37, 860870,  DOI: 10.1002/etc.4021
  44. 44
    Frank, S. D. Reduced risk insecticides to control scale insects and protect natural enemies in the production and maintenance of urban landscape plants. Environ. Entomol. 2012, 41, 377386,  DOI: 10.1603/EN11230
  45. 45
    Han, W.; Tian, Y.; Shen, X. Human exposure to neonicotinoid insecticides and the evaluation of their potential toxicity: An overview. Chemosphere 2018, 192, 5965,  DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.10.149
  46. 46
    Chen, M.; Tao, L.; McLean, J.; Lu, C. Quantitative analysis of neonicotinoid insecticide residues in foods: implication for dietary exposures. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014, 62, 60826090,  DOI: 10.1021/jf501397m
  47. 47
    Consumer Products Safety Commission. Chronic Hazard Advisory Panel on Phthalates and Phthalate Alternatives Final Report , July, 2014.
  48. 48
    California Safe Cosmetics Act of 2005. In 2005; p Chapter 729.
  49. 49
    Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008. In 2008; pp 122 STAT. 3016-122 STAT. 3077.
  50. 50
    Food and Drug Administration, Indirect Food Additives: Polymers. In 2012; Vol. 77 41,899.
  51. 51
    Pelch, K.; Wignall, J. A.; Goldstone, A. E.; Ross, P. K.; Blain, R. B.; Shapiro, A. J.; Holmgren, S. D.; Hsieh, J. H.; Svoboda, D.; Auerbach, S. S.; Parham, F. M.; Masten, S. A.; Walker, V.; Rooney, A.; Thayer, K. A. A scoping review of the health and toxicological activity of bisphenol A (BPA) structural analogues and functional alternatives. Toxicology 2019, 424, 152235  DOI: 10.1016/j.tox.2019.06.006
  52. 52
    Rosenmai, A. K.; Dybdahl, M.; Pedersen, M.; Alice van Vugt-Lussenburg, B. M.; Wedebye, E. B.; Taxvig, C.; Vinggaard, A. M. Are structural analogues to bisphenol a safe alternatives?. Toxicol. Sci. 2014, 139, 3547,  DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfu030
  53. 53
    Rodríguez-Carmona, Y.; Ashrap, P.; Calafat, A. M.; Ye, X.; Rosario, Z.; Bedrosian, L. D.; Huerta-Montanez, G.; Velez-Vega, C. M.; Alshawabkeh, A.; Cordero, J. F.; Meeker, J. D.; Watkins, D. Determinants and characterization of exposure to phthalates, DEHTP and DINCH among pregnant women in the PROTECT birth cohort in Puerto Rico. J. Exposure Sci. Environ. Epidemiol. 2020, 30, 5669,  DOI: 10.1038/s41370-019-0168-8
  54. 54
    Silva, M. J.; Jia, T.; Samandar, E.; Preau, J. L., Jr; Calafat, A. M. Environmental exposure to the plasticizer 1,2-cyclohexane dicarboxylic acid, diisononyl ester (DINCH) in U.S. adults (2000-2012). Environ. Res. 2013, 126, 159163,  DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2013.05.007
  55. 55
    Gyllenhammar, I.; Glynn, A.; Jonsson, B. A.; Lindh, C. H.; Darnerud, P. O.; Svensson, K.; Lignell, S. Diverging temporal trends of human exposure to bisphenols and plastizisers, such as phthalates, caused by substitution of legacy EDCs?. Environ. Res. 2017, 153, 4854,  DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2016.11.012
  56. 56
    Kasper-Sonnenberg, M.; Koch, H. M.; Apel, P.; Ruther, M.; Palmke, C.; Bruning, T.; Kolossa-Gehring, M. Time trend of exposure to the phthalate plasticizer substitute DINCH in Germany from 1999 to 2017: Biomonitoring data on young adults from the Environmental Specimen Bank (ESB). Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 2019, 222, 10841092,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2019.07.011
  57. 57
    Doherty, B. T.; Hammel, S. C.; Daniels, J. L.; Stapleton, H. M.; Hoffman, K. Organophosphate Esters: Are These Flame Retardants and Plasticizers Affecting Children’s Health?. Curr. Environ. Health Rep. 2019, 6, 201213,  DOI: 10.1007/s40572-019-00258-0
  58. 58
    Dodson, R. E.; Perovich, L. J.; Covaci, A.; Van den Eede, N.; Ionas, A. C.; Dirtu, A. C.; Brody, J. G.; Rudel, R. A. After the PBDE phase-out: a broad suite of flame retardants in repeat house dust samples from California. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 1305613066,  DOI: 10.1021/es303879n
  59. 59
    van der Veen, I.; de Boer, J. Phosphorus flame retardants: properties, production, environmental occurrence, toxicity and analysis. Chemosphere 2012, 88, 11191153,  DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.03.067
  60. 60
    Young, A. S.; Allen, J. G.; Kim, U. J.; Seller, S.; Webster, T. F.; Kannan, K.; Ceballos, D. M. Phthalate and Organophosphate Plasticizers in Nail Polish: Evaluation of Labels and Ingredients. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018, 52, 1284112850,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.8b04495
  61. 61
    Ingle, M. E.; Watkins, D.; Rosario, Z.; Velez Vega, C. M.; Huerta-Montanez, G.; Calafat, A. M.; Ospina, M.; Cordero, J. F.; Alshawabkeh, A.; Meeker, J. D. The association of urinary organophosphate ester metabolites and self-reported personal care and household product use among pregnant women in Puerto Rico. Environ. Res. 2019, 179, 108756  DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2019.108756
  62. 62
    Cordner, A.; Richter, L.; Brown, P. Can Chemical Class Approaches Replace Chemical-by-Chemical Strategies? Lessons from Recent U.S. FDA Regulatory Action on Per- And Polyfluoroalkyl Substances. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016, 50, 1258412591,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.6b04980
  63. 63
    Chan, M.; Mita, C.; Bellavia, A.; Parker, M.; James-Todd, T. Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Pregnancy and Prenatal Exposure to Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals Commonly Used in Personal Care Products. Curr. Environ. Health Rep. 2021, 8, 98112,  DOI: 10.1007/s40572-021-00317-5
  64. 64
    James-Todd, T. M.; Meeker, J. D.; Huang, T.; Hauser, R.; Ferguson, K. K.; Rich-Edwards, J. W.; McElrath, T. F.; Seely, E. W. Pregnancy urinary phthalate metabolite concentrations and gestational diabetes risk factors. Environ. Int. 2016, 96, 118126,  DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2016.09.009
  65. 65
    Nguyen, V. K.; Kahana, A.; Heidt, J.; Polemi, K.; Kvasnicka, J.; Jolliet, O.; Colacino, J. A. A comprehensive analysis of racial disparities in chemical biomarker concentrations in United States women, 1999-2014. Environ. Int. 2020, 137, 105496  DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.105496
  66. 66
    Buckley, J. P.; Kim, H.; Wong, E.; Rebholz, C. M. Ultra-processed food consumption and exposure to phthalates and bisphenols in the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2013-2014. Environ. Int. 2019, 131, 105057  DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.105057
  67. 67
    Zota, A. R.; Phillips, C. A.; Mitro, S. D. Recent Fast Food Consumption and Bisphenol A and Phthalates Exposures among the U.S. Population in NHANES, 2003-2010. Environ. Health Perspect. 2016, 124, 15211528,  DOI: 10.1289/ehp.1510803
  68. 68
    Payne-Sturges, D. C.; Gee, G. C.; Cory-Slechta, D. A. Confronting Racism in Environmental Health Sciences: Moving the Science Forward for Eliminating Racial Inequities. Environ. Health Perspect. 2021, 129, 55002  DOI: 10.1289/EHP8186
  69. 69
    Stanfield, Z.; Addington, C. K.; Dionisio, K. L.; Lyons, D.; Tornero-Velez, R.; Phillips, K. A.; Buckley, T. J.; Isaacs, K. K. Mining of Consumer Product Ingredient and Purchasing Data to Identify Potential Chemical Coexposures. Environ. Health Perspect. 2021, 129, 67006  DOI: 10.1289/EHP8610
  70. 70
    Zeng, D.; Kang, Y.; Chen, J.; Li, A.; Chen, W.; Li, Z.; He, L.; Zhang, Q.; Luo, J.; Zeng, L. Dermal bioaccessibility of plasticizers in indoor dust and clothing. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 672, 798805,  DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.028
  71. 71
    Hou, M.; Shi, Y.; Na, G.; Cai, Y. A review of organophosphate esters in indoor dust, air, hand wipes and silicone wristbands: Implications for human exposure. Environ. Int. 2021, 146, 106261  DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.106261
  72. 72
    Karrer, C.; Andreassen, M.; von Goetz, N.; Sonnet, F.; Sakhi, A. K.; Hungerbuhler, K.; Dirven, H.; Husoy, T. The EuroMix human biomonitoring study: Source-to-dose modeling of cumulative and aggregate exposure for the bisphenols BPA, BPS, and BPF and comparison with measured urinary levels. Environ. Int. 2020, 136, 105397  DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.105397
  73. 73
    Husøy, T.; Andreassen, M.; Hjertholm, H.; Carlsen, M. H.; Norberg, N.; Sprong, C.; Papadopoulou, E.; Sakhi, A. K.; Sabaredzovic, A.; Dirven, H. The Norwegian biomonitoring study from the EU project EuroMix: Levels of phenols and phthalates in 24-hour urine samples and exposure sources from food and personal care products. Environ. Int. 2019, 132, 105103  DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.105103
  74. 74
    Mitro, S. D.; Dodson, R. E.; Singla, V.; Adamkiewicz, G.; Elmi, A. F.; Tilly, M. K.; Zota, A. R. Consumer Product Chemicals in Indoor Dust: A Quantitative Meta-analysis of U.S. Studies. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016, 50, 1066110672,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.6b02023
  75. 75
    Shin, H. M.; Moschet, C.; Young, T. M.; Bennett, D. H. Measured concentrations of consumer product chemicals in California house dust: Implications for sources, exposure, and toxicity potential. Indoor Air 2020, 30, 6075,  DOI: 10.1111/ina.12607
  76. 76
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Fourth National Report on Human Exposure to Environmental Chemicals, Updated Tables, March 2021.
  77. 77
    Calafat, A. M.; Longnecker, M. P.; Koch, H. M.; Swan, S. H.; Hauser, R.; Goldman, L. R.; Lanphear, B. P.; Rudel, R. A.; Engel, S. M.; Teitelbaum, S. L.; Whyatt, R. M.; Wolff, M. S. Optimal Exposure Biomarkers for Nonpersistent Chemicals in Environmental Epidemiology. Environ. Health Perspect. 2015, 123, A166A168,  DOI: 10.1289/ehp.1510041
  78. 78
    Kwiatkowski, C. F.; Andrews, D. Q.; Birnbaum, L. S.; Bruton, T. A.; DeWitt, J. C.; Knappe, D. R. U.; Maffini, M. V.; Miller, M. F.; Pelch, K. E.; Reade, A.; Soehl, A.; Trier, X.; Venier, M.; Wagner, C. C.; Wang, Z.; Blum, A. Scientific Basis for Managing PFAS as a Chemical Class. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 2020, 7, 532543,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.estlett.0c00255
  79. 79
    Bălan, S. A.; Mathrani, V. C.; Guo, D. F.; Algazi, A. M. Regulating PFAS as a Chemical Class under the California Safer Consumer Products Program. Environ. Health Perspect. 2021, 129, 25001  DOI: 10.1289/EHP7431

Cited By

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!
Citation Statements
Explore this article's citation statements on scite.ai

This article is cited by 60 publications.

  1. Trevor A. Johnson, Sarah Adelman, Bobby B. Najari, Joshua F. Robinson, Linda G. Kahn, Dimitri Abrahamsson. Non-Targeted Analysis of Environmental Contaminants and Their Associations with Semen Health Factors in Men from New York City. Environment & Health 2025, 3 (2) , 164-176. https://doi.org/10.1021/envhealth.4c00165
  2. Barrett M. Welch, Paige A. Bommarito, David E. Cantonwine, Ginger L. Milne, Danielle R. Stevens, Matthew L. Edin, Darryl C. Zeldin, John D. Meeker, Thomas F. McElrath, Kelly K. Ferguson. Consumer Product Chemical Mixtures and Oxylipin-Mediated Inflammation and Oxidative Stress during Early Pregnancy: Findings from a Large US Pregnancy Cohort. Environmental Science & Technology 2025, 59 (6) , 2987-2999. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c10390
  3. Zhong-Min Li, Kurunthachalam Kannan. Urinary and Fecal Excretion of 121 Environmental Chemicals in Pet Dogs and Cats: Significance of Feces in Biomonitoring of Exposures. Environmental Science & Technology 2024, 58 (32) , 14169-14179. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c05991
  4. Jiaoyang Li, Rongbin Chen, Peng Liu, Xin Zhang, Yan Zhou, Yudong Xing, Xinhua Xiao, Zhenzhen Huang. Association of Di(2-ethylhexyl) Terephthalate and Its Metabolites with Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: An Epidemiology and Toxicology Study. Environmental Science & Technology 2024, 58 (19) , 8182-8193. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c09503
  5. Huan Lin, Wei Gao, Jingjing Li, Nan Zhao, Hongna Zhang, Juntong Wei, Xiaoran Wei, Bing Wang, Yongfeng Lin, Yuxin Zheng. Exploring Prenatal Exposure to Halogenated Compounds and Its Relationship with Birth Outcomes Using Nontarget Analysis. Environmental Science & Technology 2024, 58 (16) , 6890-6899. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c09534
  6. Wei Huang, Xiong-Fei Pan, Shuqin Tang, Fengjiang Sun, Ping Wu, Jiaying Yuan, Wenwen Sun, An Pan, Da Chen. Target Exposome for Characterizing Early Gestational Exposure to Contaminants of Emerging Concern and Association with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. Environmental Science & Technology 2023, 57 (36) , 13408-13418. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c04492
  7. Emma M. Rosen, Danielle R. Stevens, Erin E. McNell, Mollie E. Wood, Stephanie M. Engel, Alexander P. Keil, Antonia M. Calafat, Julianne Cook Botelho, Elena Sinkovskaya, Ann Przybylska, George Saade, Alfred Abuhamad, Kelly K. Ferguson. Variability and Longitudinal Trajectories of Phthalate and Replacement Biomarkers across Pregnancy in the Human Placenta and Phthalates Study. Environmental Science & Technology 2023, 57 (35) , 13036-13046. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c04043
  8. Henglin Zhang, Xueyuan Bai, Tao Zhang, Shiming Song, Hongkai Zhu, Shaoyou Lu, Kurunthachalam Kannan, Hongwen Sun. Neonicotinoid Insecticides and Their Metabolites Can Pass through the Human Placenta Unimpeded. Environmental Science & Technology 2022, 56 (23) , 17143-17152. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c06091
  9. Huijuan Wang, Yilan Shu, Zexing Kuang, Zilin Han, Jiaheng Wu, Xinmiao Huang, Xiaoyong Song, Jing Yang, Zhengqiu Fan. Bioaccumulation and potential human health risks of PAHs in marine food webs: A trophic transfer perspective. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2025, 485 , 136946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.136946
  10. Jagadeesh Puvvula, Lucie C. Song, Klaudia J. Zalewska, Ariel Alexander, Kathrine E. Manz, Joseph M. Braun, Kurt D. Pennell, Emily A. DeFranco, Shuk-Mei Ho, Yuet-Kin Leung, Shouxiong Huang, Ann M. Vuong, Stephani S. Kim, Zana Percy, Priyanka Bhashyam, Raymund Lee, Dean P. Jones, Vilinh Tran, Dasom V. Kim, Antonia M. Calafat, Julianne C. Botelho, Aimin Chen. Global metabolomic alterations associated with endocrine-disrupting chemicals among pregnant individuals and newborns. Metabolomics 2025, 21 (1) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11306-024-02219-7
  11. Megan E. Romano, Jessie P. Buckley, Xiuhong Li, Julie B. Herbstman, Kurunthachalam Kannan, Sunmi Lee, Susan L. Schantz, Leo Trasande, Margaret R. Karagas, Frederica Perera, , . Changes in urinary concentrations of contemporary and emerging chemicals in commerce during the COVID-19 pandemic: Insights from the Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) program. PLOS ONE 2025, 20 (1) , e0317358. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0317358
  12. Ling-Chuan Guo, Pan Zhu, Chunyan Gui, Jing Deng, Yanhong Gao, Chaoyang Long, Han Zhang, Zhanlu Lv, Shengbing Yu. Disrupting effects of neonicotinoids and their interaction with metals on thyroid hormone, an evidence of children in a rural area, South China. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 2025, 290 , 117788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2025.117788
  13. Maryam Zare Jeddi, Karen S. Galea, Jillian Ashley-Martin, Julianne Nassif, Tyler Pollock, Devika Poddalgoda, Konstantinos M. Kasiotis, Kyriaki Machera, Holger Koch, Marta Esteban López, Ming Kei Chung, Jihyon Kil, Kate Jones, Adrian Covaci, Yu Ait Bamai, Mariana F. Fernández, Natalie von Goetz, Henriqueta Louro, Maria João Silva, Tiina Santonen, Andromachi Katsonouri, Argelia Castano, Lesliam Quirós-Alcalá, Elizabeth Z. Lin, Krystal J. Godri Pollitt, Ana Virgolino, Paul T.J. Scheepers, Vicente Mustieles, Ana Cañas Portilla, Susana Viegas, Robert Pasanen Kase, Ovnair Sepai, E. Bird, Thomas Göen, Manosij Ghosh, Silvia Fustinoni, Hubert Dirven, Jung-Hwan Kwon, Courtney Carignan, Yuki Mizuno, Yuki Ito, Yankai Xia, Shoji F. Nakayama, Konstantinos Makris, Patrick J. Parsons, Melissa Gonzales, Michael Bader, Maria Dusinska, Aziza Menouni, Radu-Corneliu Duca, Kaoutar Chbihi, Samir El Jaafari, Lode Godderis, An vanNieuwenhuyse, Asif Qureshi, Imran Ali, Carla Costa, Joao Paulo Teixeira, Alena Bartonova, Giovanna Tranfo, Karine Audouze, Steven Verpaele, Judy S. LaKind, Hans Mol, Jos Bessems, Barbara Magagna, Maisarah Nasution Waras, Alison Connolly, Marc Nascarella, Wonho Yang, Po-Chin Huang, Jueun Lee, Henri Heussen, Ozlem Goksel, Masud Yunesian, Leo W.Y. Yeung, Gustavo Souza, Ana Maria Vekic, Erin Haynes, Nancy B. Hopf. Guidance on Minimum Information Requirements (Mir) for Designing and Reporting Human Biomonitoring (Hbm) Studies. 2025https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5178675
  14. Brennan H. Baker, Drew B. Day, Marnie F. Hazlehurst, Nicholas J. Herkert, Heather M. Stapleton, Sheela Sathyanarayana. Associations of environmental chemical exposures measured in personal silicone wristbands with sociodemographic factors, COVID-19 restrictions, and child respiratory health. Environmental Research 2024, 262 , 119776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2024.119776
  15. Mia Q. Peng, Dana Dabelea, John L. Adgate, Wei Perng, Antonia M. Calafat, Kurunthachalam Kannan, Anne P. Starling. Associations of urinary biomarkers of phthalates, phenols, parabens, and organophosphate esters with glycemic traits in pregnancy: The Healthy Start Study. Environmental Research 2024, 262 , 119810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2024.119810
  16. Jiwon Oh, Kyoungmi Kim, Kurunthachalam Kannan, Patrick J. Parsons, Agnieszka Mlodnicka, Rebecca J. Schmidt, Julie B. Schweitzer, Irva Hertz-Picciotto, Deborah H. Bennett. Early childhood exposure to environmental phenols and parabens, phthalates, organophosphate pesticides, and trace elements in association with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms in the CHARGE study. Environmental Health 2024, 23 (1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-024-01065-3
  17. Jennifer B. Sass, Daniel Raichel. Human acute poisoning incidents associated with neonicotinoid pesticides in the U.S. Incident Data System (IDS) database from 2018–2022 – frequency and severity show public health risks, regulatory failures. Environmental Health 2024, 23 (1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-024-01139-2
  18. S Wibowo, W Syafil, G Pari, E.N. Herliyana, L Efiyanti, S Komarayati. EFFECT OF LIQUID SMOKE FROM LIGNOCELLULOSE WASTE ON THE GROWTH OF Orthosiphon aristatus (Blume) Miq. UNDER A HYDROPONIC WICK SYSTEM. The Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences 2024, (5) , 1227-1238. https://doi.org/10.36899/japs.2024.5.0805
  19. Carolyn W. Kinkade, Anita Brinker, Brian Buckley, Olivia Waysack, I. Diana Fernandez, Amber Kautz, Ying Meng, Huishan Shi, Jessica Brunner, Pamela Ohman-Strickland, Susan W. Groth, Thomas G. O’Connor, Lauren M. Aleksunes, Emily S. Barrett, Zorimar Rivera-Núñez. Sociodemographic and dietary predictors of maternal and placental mycoestrogen concentrations in a US pregnancy cohort. Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology 2024, 118 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41370-024-00722-6
  20. Kristin E. Knox, Megan R. Schwarzman, Ruthann A. Rudel, Claudia Polsky, Robin E. Dodson. Trends in NHANES Biomonitored Exposures in California and the United States following Enactment of California’s Proposition 65. Environmental Health Perspectives 2024, 132 (10) https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP13956
  21. Yu-Song Huang, Hui-Zhong Shi, Xi Huang, Yi-Ming Pan, Yu-Chen Wang, Zi-Jun Gao, Pei-Yao Jiang, Wen-Yi Yang. Urinary Concentrations of Organophosphate Flame-Retardant Metabolites in the US Population. JAMA Network Open 2024, 7 (9) , e2435484. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.35484
  22. Christina H Park, Carol J Blaisdell, S Sonia Arteaga, Clay Mash, Susan Laessig, Manjit Hanspal, Erin Luetkemeier, Leslie C Thompson, Matthew W Gillman. How the Environmental Influences on Child Health Outcome (ECHO) cohort can spur discoveries in environmental epidemiology. American Journal of Epidemiology 2024, 193 (9) , 1219-1223. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwae073
  23. Emily S. Barrett, Jennifer L. Ames, Stephanie M. Eick, Alicia K. Peterson, Zorimar Rivera-Núñez, Anne P. Starling, Jessie P. Buckley, , Barbara O‟Brien, Lisa Peterson, Patrick Parsons, Kannan Kurunthacalam, Manish Arora, Timothy R. Fennell, Susan J. Sumner, Xiuxia Du, Susan L. Teitelbaum, Robert O. Wright, Heather M. Stapleton, P. Lee Ferguson, Akram Alshawabkeh, Judy Aschner, Clancy Blair, Leonardo Trasande, Carlos Camargo, Dana Dabelea, Daphne Koinis Mitchell, Cristiane Duarte, Anne Dunlop, Amy Elliott, Assiamira Ferrara, James Gern, Carrie Breton, Irva Hertz-Picciotto, Alison Hipwell, Margaret Karagas, Catherine Karr, Barry Lester, Leslie Leve, Debra MacKenzie, Scott Weiss, Cynthia McEvoy, Kristen Lyall, Thomas O‟Connor, Emily Oken, Mike O‟Shea, Jean Kerver, Julie Herbstman, Susan Schantz, Joseph Stanford, Leonardo Trasande, Rosalind Wright, Sheela Sathyanarayana, Anne Marie Singh, Annemarie Stroustrup, Tina Hartert, Jennifer Straughen, Qi Zhao, Katherine Rivera-Spoljaric, Emily S Barrett, Monique Marie Hedderson, Kelly J Hunt, Sunni L Mumford, Hong-Ngoc Nguyen, Hudson Santos, Rebecca Schmidt, Jonathan Slaughter. Advancing Understanding of Chemical Exposures and Maternal-child Health Through the U.S. Environmental Influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) Program: A Scoping Review. Current Environmental Health Reports 2024, 11 (3) , 390-403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40572-024-00456-5
  24. Mariana Parenti, Carolyn M Slupsky. Disrupted Prenatal Metabolism May Explain the Etiology of Suboptimal Neurodevelopment: A Focus on Phthalates and Micronutrients and their Relationship to Autism Spectrum Disorder. Advances in Nutrition 2024, 15 (9) , 100279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advnut.2024.100279
  25. Stephanie M. Eick, Youran Tan, Kaitlin R. Taibl, P. Barry Ryan, Dana Boyd Barr, Anke Hüls, Jasmin A. Eatman, Parinya Panuwet, Priya E. D’Souza, Volha Yakimavets, Grace E. Lee, Patricia A. Brennan, Elizabeth J. Corwin, Anne L. Dunlop, Donghai Liang. Prenatal exposure to persistent and non-persistent chemical mixtures and associations with adverse birth outcomes in the Atlanta African American Maternal-Child Cohort. Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology 2024, 34 (4) , 570-580. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41370-023-00530-4
  26. Maryam Doroudian, Negar Pourzadi, Astha Gautam, Jürgen Gailer. Translational toxicology of metal(loid) species: linking their bioinorganic chemistry in the bloodstream to organ damage onset. BioMetals 2024, 37 (3) , 739-753. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10534-023-00537-2
  27. McKenzi Thompson, Jasmin A. Eatman, Anne L. Dunlop, Dana Boyd Barr, Kurunthachalam Kannan, Elizabeth J. Corwin, P Barry Ryan, Parinya Panuwet, Volha Yakimavets, Kaitlin R. Taibl, Youran Tan, Donghai Liang, Stephanie M. Eick. Prenatal exposure to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) and associations with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in the Atlanta African American Maternal-Child cohort. Chemosphere 2024, 357 , 142052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.142052
  28. Jiwon Oh, Julie B. Schweitzer, Jessie P. Buckley, Sudhi Upadhyaya, Kurunthachalam Kannan, Julie B. Herbstman, Akhgar Ghassabian, Rebecca J. Schmidt, Irva Hertz-Picciotto, Deborah H. Bennett. Early childhood exposures to phthalates in association with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder behaviors in middle childhood and adolescence in the ReCHARGE study. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health 2024, 259 , 114377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2024.114377
  29. John D. Meeker, Kristen L. McArthur, Jennifer J. Adibi, Akram N. Alshawabkeh, Emily S. Barrett, Sara G. Brubaker, Jose F. Cordero, Dana Dabelea, Anne L. Dunlop, Julie B. Herbstman, Linda G. Kahn, Catherine J. Karr, Shilpi Mehta-Lee, Thomas G. O'Connor, Sheela Sathyanarayana, Leonardo Trasande, Jordan R. Kuiper. Urinary concentrations of phthalate metabolites in relation to preeclampsia and other hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in the environmental influences on child health outcomes (ECHO) program. Environment International 2024, 187 , 108678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2024.108678
  30. Wenlong Li, Kurunthachalam Kannan. Screening for contamination levels of select organic environmental chemicals in medical supplies used for human specimen collection. Chemosphere 2024, 353 , 141528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.141528
  31. Shichang Li, Miaomiao Zhao, Shuxian Zhang, Renjun Yang, Nuoya Yin, Hailin Wang, Francesco Faiola. Assessing developmental neurotoxicity of emerging environmental chemicals using multiple in vitro models: A comparative analysis. Environmental Pollution 2024, 347 , 123743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2024.123743
  32. Andrea Estévez-Danta, Juan F. Ayala-Cabrera, Javier López-Vázquez, Mikel Musatadi, Rosa Montes, Nestor Etxebarria, José Benito Quintana, Maitane Olivares, Ailette Prieto, Rosario Rodil, Manuel Miró, Olatz Zuloaga. Analytical methodology for unveiling human exposure to (micro)plastic additives. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry 2024, 173 , 117653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2024.117653
  33. Kjersti M. Aagaard, Shari L. Barkin, Charles F. Burant, Susan Carnell, Ellen Demerath, Sharon M. Donovan, Ihuoma Eneli, Lori A. Francis, Diane Gilbert‐Diamond, Marie‐France Hivert, Monique K. LeBourgeois, Ruth J. F. Loos, Julie C. Lumeng, Alison L. Miller, Anthony D. Okely, Stavroula K. Osganian, Amelie G. Ramirez, Leonardo Trasande, Linda V. Van Horn, Melissa Wake, Rosalind J. Wright, Susan Z. Yanovski. Understanding risk and causal mechanisms for developing obesity in infants and young children: A National Institutes of Health workshop. Obesity Reviews 2024, 25 (4) https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.13690
  34. , , Tracey J. Woodruff. Health Effects of Fossil Fuel–Derived Endocrine Disruptors. New England Journal of Medicine 2024, 390 (10) , 922-933. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra2300476
  35. Muhammad Zahid, Jabeen Taiba, Khiara Cox, Ali S. Khan, Terra Uhing, Eleanor Rogan. Pesticide residues in adults living near a bioenergy plant with 85,000 tons of contaminated wetcake. Chemosphere 2024, 349 , 140941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.140941
  36. Heather B. Patisaul. Dirty Minds: How Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals (EDCs) and Other Pollutants Affect the Neuroendocrinology of Behavior and Emotions. 2024, 217-249. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-51112-7_9
  37. Jianing Lin, Lingzhi Liao, Ting Sun, Jinzeng Gu, Xiaoxian Yang, Lutao Zhang, Zhenhui Gao, Song Feng. Spatial and temporal variability and risk assessment of organophosphate esters in seawater and sediments of the Yangtze River estuary. Marine Pollution Bulletin 2024, 198 , 115904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2023.115904
  38. Rune Lindahl-Jacobsen, Astrid Beck, Lærke Priskorn, Stine Agergaard Holmboe, Anna-Maria Andersson, Anders Juul, Niels Erik Skakkebæk. Changes in Pregnancy Rates as a Possible Marker of Declining Couple Fecundity. 2024https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4785361
  39. Ami Shah, Rachel L. Miller. Synthetic Chemicals: What We Have Learned and Still Need to Learn About Their Associations with Childhood Allergy and Asthma. Current Environmental Health Reports 2023, 10 (4) , 459-468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40572-023-00411-w
  40. Pan Yang, Jinying Xie, Songyi Huang, Xiaojie Li, Langjing Deng, Jinglei Zhang, Lin Chen, Nanxin Wu, Guangtong Huang, Canquan Zhou, Li Xiao, Xiaoting Shen. “Cocktail” of environmental chemicals and early reproductive outcomes of IVF: The insight from paternal and maternal exposure. Journal of Environmental Management 2023, 348 , 119462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119462
  41. Ixel Hernandez-Castro, Sandrah P. Eckel, Caitlin G. Howe, Zhongzheng Niu, Kurunthachalam Kannan, Morgan Robinson, Helen B. Foley, Tingyu Yang, Mario J. Vigil, Xinci Chen, Brendan Grubbs, Deborah Lerner, Nathana Lurvey, Laila Al-Marayati, Rima Habre, Genevieve F. Dunton, Shohreh F. Farzan, Max T. Aung, Carrie V. Breton, Theresa M. Bastain. Prenatal exposures to organophosphate ester metabolite mixtures and children’s neurobehavioral outcomes in the MADRES pregnancy cohort. Environmental Health 2023, 22 (1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-023-01017-3
  42. Barrett M. Welch, Alexander P. Keil, Jessie P. Buckley, Stephanie M. Engel, Tamarra James-Todd, Ami R. Zota, Akram N. Alshawabkeh, Emily S. Barrett, Michael S. Bloom, Nicole R. Bush, José F. Cordero, Dana Dabelea, Brenda Eskenazi, Bruce P. Lanphear, Vasantha Padmanabhan, Sheela Sathyanarayana, Shanna H. Swan, Jenny Aalborg, Donna D. Baird, Alexandra M. Binder, Asa Bradman, Joseph M. Braun, Antonia M. Calafat, David E. Cantonwine, Kate E. Christenbury, Pam Factor-Litvak, Kim G. Harley, Russ Hauser, Julie B. Herbstman, Irva Hertz-Picciotto, Nina Holland, Anne Marie Z. Jukic, Thomas F. McElrath, John D. Meeker, Carmen Messerlian, Karin B. Michels, Roger B. Newman, Ruby H.N. Nguyen, Katie M. O’Brien, Virginia A. Rauh, Bruce Redmon, David Q. Rich, Emma M. Rosen, Rebecca J. Schmidt, Amy E. Sparks, Anne P. Starling, Christina Wang, Deborah J. Watkins, Clarice R. Weinberg, Barry Weinberger, Abby G. Wenzel, Allen J. Wilcox, Kimberly Yolton, Yu Zhang, Kelly K. Ferguson. Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Phthalate Exposure and Preterm Birth: A Pooled Study of Sixteen U.S. Cohorts. Environmental Health Perspectives 2023, 131 (12) https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP12831
  43. Kelly M. Bakulski, Freida Blostein, Stephanie J. London. Linking Prenatal Environmental Exposures to Lifetime Health with Epigenome-Wide Association Studies: State-of-the-Science Review and Future Recommendations. Environmental Health Perspectives 2023, 131 (12) https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP12956
  44. Margaret H. Rabotnick, Jessa Ehlinger, Ariana Haidari, Jaclyn M. Goodrich. Prenatal exposures to endocrine disrupting chemicals: The role of multi-omics in understanding toxicity. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology 2023, 578 , 112046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mce.2023.112046
  45. Victoria S. Jiang, Antonia M. Calafat, Paige L. Williams, Jorge E. Chavarro, Jennifer B. Ford, Irene Souter, Russ Hauser, Lidia Mínguez-Alarcón. Temporal trends in urinary concentrations of phenols, phthalate metabolites and phthalate replacements between 2000 and 2017 in Boston, MA. Science of The Total Environment 2023, 898 , 165353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165353
  46. Maximilien Génard-Walton, Glen McGee, Paige L. Williams, Irene Souter, Jennifer B. Ford, Jorge E. Chavarro, Antonia M. Calafat, Russ Hauser, Lidia Mínguez-Alarcón. Mixtures of urinary concentrations of phenols and phthalate biomarkers in relation to the ovarian reserve among women attending a fertility clinic. Science of The Total Environment 2023, 898 , 165536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165536
  47. P.A. Bommarito, A. Friedman, B.M. Welch, D.E. Cantonwine, M. Ospina, A.M. Calafat, J.D. Meeker, T.F. McElrath, K.K. Ferguson. Temporal trends and predictors of gestational exposure to organophosphate ester flame retardants and plasticizers. Environment International 2023, 180 , 108194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2023.108194
  48. Emily A Knapp, Amii M Kress, Corette B Parker, Grier P Page, Kristen McArthur, Kennedy K Gachigi, Akram N Alshawabkeh, Judy L Aschner, Theresa M Bastain, Carrie V Breton, Casper G Bendixsen, Patricia A Brennan, Nicole R Bush, Claudia Buss, Carlos A Camargo, Jr., Diane Catellier, José F Cordero, Lisa Croen, Dana Dabelea, Sean Deoni, Viren D’Sa, Cristiane S Duarte, Anne L Dunlop, Amy J Elliott, Shohreh F Farzan, Assiamira Ferrara, Jody M Ganiban, James E Gern, Angelo P Giardino, Nissa R Towe-Goodman, Diane R Gold, Rima Habre, Ghassan B Hamra, Tina Hartert, Julie B Herbstman, Irva Hertz-Picciotto, Alison E Hipwell, Margaret R Karagas, Catherine J Karr, Kate Keenan, Jean M Kerver, Daphne Koinis-Mitchell, Bryan Lau, Barry M Lester, Leslie D Leve, Bennett Leventhal, Kaja Z LeWinn, Johnnye Lewis, Augusto A Litonjua, Kristen Lyall, Juliette C Madan, Cindy T McEvoy, Monica McGrath, John D Meeker, Rachel L Miller, Rachel Morello-Frosch, Jenae M Neiderhiser, Thomas G O’Connor, Emily Oken, Michael O’Shea, Nigel Paneth, Christina A Porucznik, Sheela Sathyanarayana, Susan L Schantz, Eliot R Spindel, Joseph B Stanford, Annemarie Stroustrup, Susan L Teitelbaum, Leonardo Trasande, Heather Volk, Pathik D Wadhwa, Scott T Weiss, Tracey J Woodruff, Rosalind J Wright, Qi Zhao, Lisa P Jacobson, , on behalf of program collaborators for Environmental Influences on Child Health Outcomes. The Environmental Influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO)-Wide Cohort. American Journal of Epidemiology 2023, 192 (8) , 1249-1263. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwad071
  49. M.M. Borghese, R. Huang, S. MacPherson, E. Gaudreau, S. Gagné, J. Ashley-Martin, M. Fisher, L. Booij, M.F. Bouchard, T.E. Arbuckle. A descriptive analysis of first trimester urinary concentrations of 14 bisphenol analogues in the MIREC Canadian pregnancy cohort. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health 2023, 253 , 114225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2023.114225
  50. Danielle R. Stevens, Anne P. Starling, Paige A. Bommarito, Alexander P. Keil, Dorothy Nakiwala, Antonia M. Calafat, John L. Adgate, Dana Dabelea, Kelly K. Ferguson. Midpregnancy Phthalate and Phenol Biomarkers in Relation to Infant Body Composition: The Healthy Start Prospective Cohort. Environmental Health Perspectives 2023, 131 (8) https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP12500
  51. Danielle R. Stevens, Emma M. Rosen, Kimi Van Wickle, Erin E. McNell, Paige A. Bommarito, Antonia M. Calafat, Julianne C. Botelho, Elena Sinkovskaya, Ann Przybylska, George Saade, Alfred Abuhamad, Kelly K. Ferguson. Early pregnancy phthalates and replacements in relation to fetal growth: The human placenta and phthalates study. Environmental Research 2023, 229 , 115975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2023.115975
  52. Jessica Trowbridge, Dimitri Abrahamsson, Garret D. Bland, Ting Jiang, Miaomiao Wang, June-Soo Park, Rachel Morello-Frosch, Marina Sirota, Harim Lee, Dana E. Goin, Marya G. Zlatnik, Tracey J. Woodruff. Extending Nontargeted Discovery of Environmental Chemical Exposures during Pregnancy and Their Association with Pregnancy Complications—A Cross-Sectional Study. Environmental Health Perspectives 2023, 131 (7) https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP11546
  53. Jillian Ashley-Martin, Susan MacPherson, Zhao Zhao, Éric Gaudreau, Gilles Provencher, Mandy Fisher, Michael M. Borghese, Maryse F. Bouchard, Linda Booij, Tye E. Arbuckle. Descriptive analysis of organophosphate ester metabolites in a pan-Canadian pregnancy cohort. Science of The Total Environment 2023, 883 , 163327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163327
  54. Josephine B. Allen, Christopher Ludtka, Bryan D. James. Sex as a Biological Variable in Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering 2023, 25 (1) , 311-331. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-bioeng-092222-030857
  55. P.A. Bommarito, D.R. Stevens, B.M. Welch, D. Weller, J.D. Meeker, D.E. Cantonwine, T.F. McElrath, K.K. Ferguson. Temporal trends and predictors of phthalate, phthalate replacement, and phenol biomarkers in the LIFECODES Fetal Growth Study. Environment International 2023, 174 , 107898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2023.107898
  56. Nina Vogel, Phillipp Schmidt, Rosa Lange, Antje Gerofke, Amrit K. Sakhi, Line S. Haug, Tina Kold Jensen, Hanne Frederiksen, Tamás Szigeti, Zsófia Csákó, Lubica Palkovicova Murinova, Miroslava Sidlovska, Beata Janasik, Wojciech Wasowicz, Janja Snoj Tratnik, Darja Mazej, Catherine Gabriel, Spyros Karakitsios, Fabio Barbone, Valentina Rosolen, Loïc Rambaud, Margaux Riou, Aline Murawski, Daan Leseman, Gudrun Koppen, Adrian Covaci, Sanna Lignell, Anna Karin Lindroos, Martin Zvonar, Lenka Andryskova, Lucia Fabelova, Denisa Richterova, Milena Horvat, Tina Kosjek, Denis Sarigiannis, Marios Maroulis, Susana Pedraza-Diaz, Ana Cañas, Veerle J. Verheyen, Michiel Bastiaensen, Liese Gilles, Greet Schoeters, Marta Esteban-López, Argelia Castaño, Eva Govarts, Holger M. Koch, Marike Kolossa-Gehring. Current exposure to phthalates and DINCH in European children and adolescents – Results from the HBM4EU Aligned Studies 2014 to 2021. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health 2023, 249 , 114101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2022.114101
  57. Jessica Trowbridge, Dana E. Goin, Dimitri Abrahamsson, Rachel Sklar, Tracey J. Woodruff. Fossil fuel is the common denominator between climate change and petrochemical exposures, and effects on women and childrenʼs health. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 2023, 160 (2) , 368-371. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.14408
  58. Laura N. Vandenberg, Swati D. G. Rayasam, Daniel A. Axelrad, Deborah H. Bennett, Phil Brown, Courtney C. Carignan, Nicholas Chartres, Miriam L. Diamond, Rashmi Joglekar, Bhavna Shamasunder, Kristin Shrader-Frechette, Wilma A. Subra, Ken Zarker, Tracey J. Woodruff. Addressing systemic problems with exposure assessments to protect the public’s health. Environmental Health 2023, 21 (S1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-022-00917-0
  59. Tracey J. Woodruff, Swati D. G. Rayasam, Daniel A. Axelrad, Patricia D. Koman, Nicholas Chartres, Deborah H. Bennett, Linda S. Birnbaum, Phil Brown, Courtney C. Carignan, Courtney Cooper, Carl F. Cranor, Miriam L. Diamond, Shari Franjevic, Eve C. Gartner, Dale Hattis, Russ Hauser, Wendy Heiger-Bernays, Rashmi Joglekar, Juleen Lam, Jonathan I. Levy, Patrick M. MacRoy, Maricel V. Maffini, Emily C. Marquez, Rachel Morello-Frosch, Keeve E. Nachman, Greylin H. Nielsen, Catherine Oksas, Dimitri Panagopoulos Abrahamsson, Heather B. Patisaul, Sharyle Patton, Joshua F. Robinson, Kathryn M. Rodgers, Mark S. Rossi, Ruthann A. Rudel, Jennifer B. Sass, Sheela Sathyanarayana, Ted Schettler, Rachel M. Shaffer, Bhavna Shamasunder, Peggy M. Shepard, Kristin Shrader-Frechette, Gina M. Solomon, Wilma A. Subra, Laura N. Vandenberg, Julia R. Varshavsky, Roberta F. White, Ken Zarker, Lauren Zeise. A science-based agenda for health-protective chemical assessments and decisions: overview and consensus statement. Environmental Health 2023, 21 (S1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-022-00930-3
  60. Muhammad Zahid, Jabeen Taiba, Khiara Cox, Ali S. Khan, Terra Uhing, Eleanor Rogan. Pesticide Residues in Adults Living Near a Bioenergy Plant with 85,000 Tons of Contaminated Wetcake. 2023https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4575703
  61. Wenlong Li, Kurunthachalam Kannan. Screening for Contamination Levels of Select Organic Environmental Chemicals in Medical Supplies Used for Human Specimen Collection. 2023https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4676095
  62. Michael S. Bloom, Meghana Varde, Roger B. Newman. Environmental toxicants and placental function. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology 2022, 85 , 105-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2022.09.003
  63. Carolin Huber, Rosalie Nijssen, Hans Mol, Jean Philippe Antignac, Martin Krauss, Werner Brack, Kevin Wagner, Laurent Debrauwer, Chiara Maria Vitale, Elliott James Price, Jana Klanova, Borja Garlito Molina, Nuria Leon, Olga Pardo, Sandra F. Fernández, Tamás Szigeti, Szilvia Középesy, Libor Šulc, Pavel Čupr, Inese Mārtiņsone, Läsma Akülova, Ilse Ottenbros, Roel Vermeulen, Jelle Vlaanderen, Mirjam Luijten, Arjen Lommen. A large scale multi-laboratory suspect screening of pesticide metabolites in human biomonitoring: From tentative annotations to verified occurrences. Environment International 2022, 168 , 107452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2022.107452
  64. Mariana Parenti, Rebecca J. Schmidt, Sally Ozonoff, Hyeong-Moo Shin, Daniel J. Tancredi, Paula Krakowiak, Irva Hertz-Picciotto, Cheryl K. Walker, Carolyn M. Slupsky. Maternal Serum and Placental Metabolomes in Association with Prenatal Phthalate Exposure and Neurodevelopmental Outcomes in the MARBLES Cohort. Metabolites 2022, 12 (9) , 829. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo12090829

Environmental Science & Technology

Cite this: Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022, 56, 10, 6560–6573
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c08942
Published May 10, 2022

Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under

CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 .

Article Views

34k

Altmetric

-

Citations

Learn about these metrics

Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.

  • Abstract

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. Spearman correlation heat map of urinary analyte concentrations measured among 171 pregnant women in ECHO. It includes analytes detected in at least three cohorts and ≥70% of the overall study sample. Values below the limit of detection (LOD) were set to LOD/√2 unless machine-read values were provided. Bold indicates analytes not previously included in NHANES biomonitoring. Boxes indicate within class correlations.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. Univariable associations of maternal sociodemographic and specimen collection characteristics with creatinine-adjusted analyte concentrations. Bold indicates analytes not previously included in NHANES biomonitoring. OP, organophosphate; OPE, organophosphate ester; and PAH, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon.

  • References


    This article references 79 other publications.

    1. 1
      Braun, J. M. Early-life exposure to EDCs: role in childhood obesity and neurodevelopment. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2017, 13, 161173,  DOI: 10.1038/nrendo.2016.186
    2. 2
      Braun, J. M.; Sathyanarayana, S.; Hauser, R. Phthalate exposure and children’s health. Curr. Opin. Pediatr. 2013, 25, 247254,  DOI: 10.1097/MOP.0b013e32835e1eb6
    3. 3
      Dodson, R. E.; Nishioka, M.; Standley, L. J.; Perovich, L. J.; Brody, J. G.; Rudel, R. A. Endocrine disruptors and asthma-associated chemicals in consumer products. Environ. Health Perspect. 2012, 120, 935943,  DOI: 10.1289/ehp.1104052
    4. 4
      Woodruff, T. J.; Zota, A. R.; Schwartz, J. M. Environmental chemicals in pregnant women in the United States: NHANES 2003-2004. Environ. Health Perspect. 2011, 119, 878885,  DOI: 10.1289/ehp.1002727
    5. 5
      Wang, A.; Padula, A.; Sirota, M.; Woodruff, T. J. Environmental influences on reproductive health: the importance of chemical exposures. Fertil. Steril. 2016, 106, 905929,  DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.07.1076
    6. 6
      US EPA TSCA chemical substance inventory www.epa.gov/tsca-inventory (June 1).
    7. 7
      Blum, A.; Behl, M.; Birnbaum, L.; Diamond, M. L.; Phillips, A.; Singla, V.; Sipes, N. S.; Stapleton, H. M.; Venier, M. Organophosphate Ester Flame Retardants: Are They a Regrettable Substitution for Polybrominated Diphenyl Ethers?. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 2019, 6, 638649,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.estlett.9b00582
    8. 8
      National Research Council. Committee on the Design and Evaluation of Safer Chemical Substitutions: A Framework to Inform Government and Industry Decision. Board on Chemical Sciences and Technology; Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology; Division on Earth and Life Studies. In A Framework to Guide Selection of Chemical Alternatives; National Academies Press (US): Washington (DC), 2014.
    9. 9
      Rochester, J. R.; Bolden, A. L.; Bisphenol, S. and F: A Systematic Review and Comparison of the Hormonal Activity of Bisphenol A Substitutes. Environ. Health Perspect. 2015, 123, 643650,  DOI: 10.1289/ehp.1408989
    10. 10
      CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) NHANES 2007-2010 Sampling Methodology Note https://wwwn.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/continuousnhanes/samplingnotes.aspx?BeginYear=2007 (accessed Dec 29, 2021).
    11. 11
      Buckley, J. P.; Barrett, E. S.; Beamer, P. I.; Bennett, D. H.; Bloom, M. S.; Fennell, T. R.; Fry, R. C.; Funk, W. E.; Hamra, G. B.; Hecht, S. S.; Kannan, K.; Iyer, R.; Karagas, M. R.; Lyall, K.; Parsons, P. J.; Pellizzari, E. D.; Signes-Pastor, A. J.; Starling, A. P.; Wang, A.; Watkins, D. J.; Zhang, M.; Woodruff, T. J.; program collaborators for ECHO Opportunities for evaluating chemical exposures and child health in the United States: the Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) Program. J. Exposure Sci. Environ. Epidemiol. 2020, 30, 397419,  DOI: 10.1038/s41370-020-0211-9
    12. 12
      ECHO. Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes: A program supported by the NIH. https://echochildren.org/ (September 27).
    13. 13
      Pellizzari, E. D.; Woodruff, T. J.; Boyles, R. R.; Kannan, K.; Beamer, P. I.; Buckley, J. P.; Wang, A.; Zhu, Y.; Bennett, D. H. Identifying and Prioritizing Chemicals with Uncertain Burden of Exposure: Opportunities for Biomonitoring and Health-Related Research. Environ. Health Perspect. 2019, 127, 126001  DOI: 10.1289/EHP5133
    14. 14
      Zhu, H.; Chinthakindi, S.; Kannan, K. A method for the analysis of 121 multi-class environmental chemicals in urine by high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A 2021, 1646, 462146  DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2021.462146
    15. 15
      Kannan, K.; Stathis, A.; Mazzella, M. J.; Andra, S. S.; Barr, D. B.; Hecht, S. S.; Merrill, L. S.; Galusha, A. L.; Parsons, P. J. Quality assurance and harmonization for targeted biomonitoring measurements of environmental organic chemicals across the Children’s Health Exposure Analysis Resource laboratory network. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 2021, 234, 113741  DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2021.113741
    16. 16
      Barr, D. B.; Silva, M. J.; Kato, K.; Reidy, J. A.; Malek, N. A.; Hurtz, D.; Sadowski, M.; Needham, L. L.; Calafat, A. M. Assessing human exposure to phthalates using monoesters and their oxidized metabolites as biomarkers. Environ. Health Perspect. 2003, 111, 11481151,  DOI: 10.1289/ehp.6074
    17. 17
      Wolff, M. S.; Engel, S. M.; Berkowitz, G. S.; Ye, X.; Silva, M. J.; Zhu, C.; Wetmur, J.; Calafat, A. M. Prenatal phenol and phthalate exposures and birth outcomes. Environ. Health Perspect. 2008, 116, 10921097,  DOI: 10.1289/ehp.11007
    18. 18
      Braun, J. M.; Bellinger, D. C.; Hauser, R.; Wright, R. O.; Chen, A.; Calafat, A. M.; Yolton, K.; Lanphear, B. P. Prenatal phthalate, triclosan, and bisphenol A exposures and child visual-spatial abilities. Neurotoxicology 2017, 58, 7583,  DOI: 10.1016/j.neuro.2016.11.009
    19. 19
      Lubin, J. H.; Colt, J. S.; Camann, D.; Davis, S.; Cerhan, J. R.; Severson, R. K.; Bernstein, L.; Hartge, P. Epidemiologic evaluation of measurement data in the presence of detection limits. Environ. Health Perspect. 2004, 112, 16911696,  DOI: 10.1289/ehp.7199
    20. 20
      Hornung, R. W.; Reed, L. D. Estimation of Average Concentration in the Presence of Nondetectable Values. Appl. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 1990, 5, 4651,  DOI: 10.1080/1047322X.1990.10389587
    21. 21
      Barr, D. B.; Wang, R. Y.; Needham, L. L. Biologic monitoring of exposure to environmental chemicals throughout the life stages: requirements and issues for consideration for the National Children’s Study. Environ. Health Perspect. 2005, 113, 10831091,  DOI: 10.1289/ehp.7617
    22. 22
      O’Brien, K. M.; Upson, K.; Cook, N. R.; Weinberg, C. R. Environmental Chemicals in Urine and Blood: Improving Methods for Creatinine and Lipid Adjustment. Environ. Health Perspect. 2016, 124, 220227,  DOI: 10.1289/ehp.1509693
    23. 23
      Boeniger, M. F.; Lowry, L. K.; Rosenberg, J. Interpretation of urine results used to assess chemical exposure with emphasis on creatinine adjustments: a review. Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J. 1993, 54, 615627,  DOI: 10.1080/15298669391355134
    24. 24
      Kuiper, J. R.; O’Brien, K. M.; Ferguson, K. K.; Buckley, J. P. Urinary specific gravity measures in the U.S. population: Implications for the adjustment of non-persistent chemical urinary biomarker data. Environ. Int. 2021, 156, 106656  DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106656
    25. 25
      Shelby, M. D. NTP-CERHR monograph on the potential human reproductive and developmental effects of di (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) NTP CERHR MON , 2006, 18.
    26. 26
      Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986. Chemicals Known to the State to Cause Cancer or Reproductive Toxicity. March 19, 2021 Proposition 65 List https://oehha.ca.gov/proposition-65/proposition-65-list (accessed Aug 30, 2021).
    27. 27
      European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) Evaluation of New Scientific Evidence Concerning DINP and DIDP: In Relation to Entry 52 of Annex XVII to REACH Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 https://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/31b4067e-de40-4044-93e8-9c9ff1960715 (accessed Aug 30, 2021).
    28. 28
      European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) Inclusion of substances of very high conern in the candidate list (Decision by the Executive Director). https://www.echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/78d8ecfd-5e83-4299-9f16-15681ee11bbb (accessed Aug 30, 2021).
    29. 29
      European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) Substance Infocard: acetamiprid. https://echa.europa.eu/substance-information/-/substanceinfo/100.111.622 (accessed Aug 30, 2021).
    30. 30
      European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) Substance Infocard: 6-chloronicotinic acid. https://echa.europa.eu/substance-information/-/substanceinfo/100.023.819 (accessed Aug 30, 2021).
    31. 31
      European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) Substance Infocard: 2,2’,4,4’-tetrahydroxybenzophenone https://echa.europa.eu/substance-information/-/substanceinfo/100.004.573 (accessed Aug 30, 2021).
    32. 32
      European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) Substance Infocard: 4-hydroxybenzophenone. https://echa.europa.eu/substance-information/-/substanceinfo/100.013.188 (accessed Aug 30, 2021).
    33. 33
      European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) Substance Infocard: Diheptyl phthalate https://echa.europa.eu/substance-information/-/substanceinfo/100.020.806 (accessed Aug 30, 2021).
    34. 34
      European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) Substance Infocard: Dipentyl phthalate. https://echa.europa.eu/substance-information/-/substanceinfo/100.004.563 (accessed Aug 30, 2021).
    35. 35
      Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) Proposition 65 Fact Sheets: Phthalates https://www.p65warnings.ca.gov/fact-sheets/phthalates (accessed Aug 30, 2021).
    36. 36
      Ospina, M.; Wong, L. Y.; Baker, S. E.; Serafim, A. B.; Morales-Agudelo, P.; Calafat, A. M. Exposure to neonicotinoid insecticides in the U.S. general population: Data from the 2015-2016 national health and nutrition examination survey. Environ. Res. 2019, 176, 108555  DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2019.108555
    37. 37
      Casida, J. E. Neonicotinoids and Other Insect Nicotinic Receptor Competitive Modulators: Progress and Prospects. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2018, 63, 125144,  DOI: 10.1146/annurev-ento-020117-043042
    38. 38
      Douglas, M. R.; Tooker, J. F. Large-scale deployment of seed treatments has driven rapid increase in use of neonicotinoid insecticides and preemptive pest management in US field crops. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49, 50885097,  DOI: 10.1021/es506141g
    39. 39
      Jeschke, P.; Nauen, R.; Schindler, M.; Elbert, A. Overview of the status and global strategy for neonicotinoids. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011, 59, 28972908,  DOI: 10.1021/jf101303g
    40. 40
      Simon-Delso, N.; Amaral-Rogers, V.; Belzunces, L. P.; Bonmatin, J. M.; Chagnon, M.; Downs, C.; Furlan, L.; Gibbons, D. W.; Giorio, C.; Girolami, V.; Goulson, D.; Kreutzweiser, D. P.; Krupke, C. H.; Liess, M.; Long, E.; McField, M.; Mineau, P.; Mitchell, E. A.; Morrissey, C. A.; Noome, D. A.; Pisa, L.; Settele, J.; Stark, J. D.; Tapparo, A.; Van Dyck, H.; Van Praagh, J.; Van der Sluijs, J. P.; Whitehorn, P. R.; Wiemers, M. Systemic insecticides (neonicotinoids and fipronil): trends, uses, mode of action and metabolites. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2015, 22, 534,  DOI: 10.1007/s11356-014-3470-y
    41. 41
      Goulson, D. An overview of the environmental risks posed by neonicotinoid insecticides. J. Appl. Ecol. 2013, 50, 977987,  DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.12111
    42. 42
      Tomizawa, M.; Casida, J. E. Neonicotinoid insecticide toxicology: mechanisms of selective action. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2005, 45, 247268,  DOI: 10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.45.120403.095930
    43. 43
      Mach, B. M.; Bondarenko, S.; Potter, D. A. Uptake and dissipation of neonicotinoid residues in nectar and foliage of systemically treated woody landscape plants. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2018, 37, 860870,  DOI: 10.1002/etc.4021
    44. 44
      Frank, S. D. Reduced risk insecticides to control scale insects and protect natural enemies in the production and maintenance of urban landscape plants. Environ. Entomol. 2012, 41, 377386,  DOI: 10.1603/EN11230
    45. 45
      Han, W.; Tian, Y.; Shen, X. Human exposure to neonicotinoid insecticides and the evaluation of their potential toxicity: An overview. Chemosphere 2018, 192, 5965,  DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.10.149
    46. 46
      Chen, M.; Tao, L.; McLean, J.; Lu, C. Quantitative analysis of neonicotinoid insecticide residues in foods: implication for dietary exposures. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014, 62, 60826090,  DOI: 10.1021/jf501397m
    47. 47
      Consumer Products Safety Commission. Chronic Hazard Advisory Panel on Phthalates and Phthalate Alternatives Final Report , July, 2014.
    48. 48
      California Safe Cosmetics Act of 2005. In 2005; p Chapter 729.
    49. 49
      Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008. In 2008; pp 122 STAT. 3016-122 STAT. 3077.
    50. 50
      Food and Drug Administration, Indirect Food Additives: Polymers. In 2012; Vol. 77 41,899.
    51. 51
      Pelch, K.; Wignall, J. A.; Goldstone, A. E.; Ross, P. K.; Blain, R. B.; Shapiro, A. J.; Holmgren, S. D.; Hsieh, J. H.; Svoboda, D.; Auerbach, S. S.; Parham, F. M.; Masten, S. A.; Walker, V.; Rooney, A.; Thayer, K. A. A scoping review of the health and toxicological activity of bisphenol A (BPA) structural analogues and functional alternatives. Toxicology 2019, 424, 152235  DOI: 10.1016/j.tox.2019.06.006
    52. 52
      Rosenmai, A. K.; Dybdahl, M.; Pedersen, M.; Alice van Vugt-Lussenburg, B. M.; Wedebye, E. B.; Taxvig, C.; Vinggaard, A. M. Are structural analogues to bisphenol a safe alternatives?. Toxicol. Sci. 2014, 139, 3547,  DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfu030
    53. 53
      Rodríguez-Carmona, Y.; Ashrap, P.; Calafat, A. M.; Ye, X.; Rosario, Z.; Bedrosian, L. D.; Huerta-Montanez, G.; Velez-Vega, C. M.; Alshawabkeh, A.; Cordero, J. F.; Meeker, J. D.; Watkins, D. Determinants and characterization of exposure to phthalates, DEHTP and DINCH among pregnant women in the PROTECT birth cohort in Puerto Rico. J. Exposure Sci. Environ. Epidemiol. 2020, 30, 5669,  DOI: 10.1038/s41370-019-0168-8
    54. 54
      Silva, M. J.; Jia, T.; Samandar, E.; Preau, J. L., Jr; Calafat, A. M. Environmental exposure to the plasticizer 1,2-cyclohexane dicarboxylic acid, diisononyl ester (DINCH) in U.S. adults (2000-2012). Environ. Res. 2013, 126, 159163,  DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2013.05.007
    55. 55
      Gyllenhammar, I.; Glynn, A.; Jonsson, B. A.; Lindh, C. H.; Darnerud, P. O.; Svensson, K.; Lignell, S. Diverging temporal trends of human exposure to bisphenols and plastizisers, such as phthalates, caused by substitution of legacy EDCs?. Environ. Res. 2017, 153, 4854,  DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2016.11.012
    56. 56
      Kasper-Sonnenberg, M.; Koch, H. M.; Apel, P.; Ruther, M.; Palmke, C.; Bruning, T.; Kolossa-Gehring, M. Time trend of exposure to the phthalate plasticizer substitute DINCH in Germany from 1999 to 2017: Biomonitoring data on young adults from the Environmental Specimen Bank (ESB). Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 2019, 222, 10841092,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2019.07.011
    57. 57
      Doherty, B. T.; Hammel, S. C.; Daniels, J. L.; Stapleton, H. M.; Hoffman, K. Organophosphate Esters: Are These Flame Retardants and Plasticizers Affecting Children’s Health?. Curr. Environ. Health Rep. 2019, 6, 201213,  DOI: 10.1007/s40572-019-00258-0
    58. 58
      Dodson, R. E.; Perovich, L. J.; Covaci, A.; Van den Eede, N.; Ionas, A. C.; Dirtu, A. C.; Brody, J. G.; Rudel, R. A. After the PBDE phase-out: a broad suite of flame retardants in repeat house dust samples from California. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 1305613066,  DOI: 10.1021/es303879n
    59. 59
      van der Veen, I.; de Boer, J. Phosphorus flame retardants: properties, production, environmental occurrence, toxicity and analysis. Chemosphere 2012, 88, 11191153,  DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.03.067
    60. 60
      Young, A. S.; Allen, J. G.; Kim, U. J.; Seller, S.; Webster, T. F.; Kannan, K.; Ceballos, D. M. Phthalate and Organophosphate Plasticizers in Nail Polish: Evaluation of Labels and Ingredients. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018, 52, 1284112850,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.8b04495
    61. 61
      Ingle, M. E.; Watkins, D.; Rosario, Z.; Velez Vega, C. M.; Huerta-Montanez, G.; Calafat, A. M.; Ospina, M.; Cordero, J. F.; Alshawabkeh, A.; Meeker, J. D. The association of urinary organophosphate ester metabolites and self-reported personal care and household product use among pregnant women in Puerto Rico. Environ. Res. 2019, 179, 108756  DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2019.108756
    62. 62
      Cordner, A.; Richter, L.; Brown, P. Can Chemical Class Approaches Replace Chemical-by-Chemical Strategies? Lessons from Recent U.S. FDA Regulatory Action on Per- And Polyfluoroalkyl Substances. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016, 50, 1258412591,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.6b04980
    63. 63
      Chan, M.; Mita, C.; Bellavia, A.; Parker, M.; James-Todd, T. Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Pregnancy and Prenatal Exposure to Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals Commonly Used in Personal Care Products. Curr. Environ. Health Rep. 2021, 8, 98112,  DOI: 10.1007/s40572-021-00317-5
    64. 64
      James-Todd, T. M.; Meeker, J. D.; Huang, T.; Hauser, R.; Ferguson, K. K.; Rich-Edwards, J. W.; McElrath, T. F.; Seely, E. W. Pregnancy urinary phthalate metabolite concentrations and gestational diabetes risk factors. Environ. Int. 2016, 96, 118126,  DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2016.09.009
    65. 65
      Nguyen, V. K.; Kahana, A.; Heidt, J.; Polemi, K.; Kvasnicka, J.; Jolliet, O.; Colacino, J. A. A comprehensive analysis of racial disparities in chemical biomarker concentrations in United States women, 1999-2014. Environ. Int. 2020, 137, 105496  DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.105496
    66. 66
      Buckley, J. P.; Kim, H.; Wong, E.; Rebholz, C. M. Ultra-processed food consumption and exposure to phthalates and bisphenols in the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2013-2014. Environ. Int. 2019, 131, 105057  DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.105057
    67. 67
      Zota, A. R.; Phillips, C. A.; Mitro, S. D. Recent Fast Food Consumption and Bisphenol A and Phthalates Exposures among the U.S. Population in NHANES, 2003-2010. Environ. Health Perspect. 2016, 124, 15211528,  DOI: 10.1289/ehp.1510803
    68. 68
      Payne-Sturges, D. C.; Gee, G. C.; Cory-Slechta, D. A. Confronting Racism in Environmental Health Sciences: Moving the Science Forward for Eliminating Racial Inequities. Environ. Health Perspect. 2021, 129, 55002  DOI: 10.1289/EHP8186
    69. 69
      Stanfield, Z.; Addington, C. K.; Dionisio, K. L.; Lyons, D.; Tornero-Velez, R.; Phillips, K. A.; Buckley, T. J.; Isaacs, K. K. Mining of Consumer Product Ingredient and Purchasing Data to Identify Potential Chemical Coexposures. Environ. Health Perspect. 2021, 129, 67006  DOI: 10.1289/EHP8610
    70. 70
      Zeng, D.; Kang, Y.; Chen, J.; Li, A.; Chen, W.; Li, Z.; He, L.; Zhang, Q.; Luo, J.; Zeng, L. Dermal bioaccessibility of plasticizers in indoor dust and clothing. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 672, 798805,  DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.028
    71. 71
      Hou, M.; Shi, Y.; Na, G.; Cai, Y. A review of organophosphate esters in indoor dust, air, hand wipes and silicone wristbands: Implications for human exposure. Environ. Int. 2021, 146, 106261  DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.106261
    72. 72
      Karrer, C.; Andreassen, M.; von Goetz, N.; Sonnet, F.; Sakhi, A. K.; Hungerbuhler, K.; Dirven, H.; Husoy, T. The EuroMix human biomonitoring study: Source-to-dose modeling of cumulative and aggregate exposure for the bisphenols BPA, BPS, and BPF and comparison with measured urinary levels. Environ. Int. 2020, 136, 105397  DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.105397
    73. 73
      Husøy, T.; Andreassen, M.; Hjertholm, H.; Carlsen, M. H.; Norberg, N.; Sprong, C.; Papadopoulou, E.; Sakhi, A. K.; Sabaredzovic, A.; Dirven, H. The Norwegian biomonitoring study from the EU project EuroMix: Levels of phenols and phthalates in 24-hour urine samples and exposure sources from food and personal care products. Environ. Int. 2019, 132, 105103  DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.105103
    74. 74
      Mitro, S. D.; Dodson, R. E.; Singla, V.; Adamkiewicz, G.; Elmi, A. F.; Tilly, M. K.; Zota, A. R. Consumer Product Chemicals in Indoor Dust: A Quantitative Meta-analysis of U.S. Studies. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016, 50, 1066110672,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.6b02023
    75. 75
      Shin, H. M.; Moschet, C.; Young, T. M.; Bennett, D. H. Measured concentrations of consumer product chemicals in California house dust: Implications for sources, exposure, and toxicity potential. Indoor Air 2020, 30, 6075,  DOI: 10.1111/ina.12607
    76. 76
      Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Fourth National Report on Human Exposure to Environmental Chemicals, Updated Tables, March 2021.
    77. 77
      Calafat, A. M.; Longnecker, M. P.; Koch, H. M.; Swan, S. H.; Hauser, R.; Goldman, L. R.; Lanphear, B. P.; Rudel, R. A.; Engel, S. M.; Teitelbaum, S. L.; Whyatt, R. M.; Wolff, M. S. Optimal Exposure Biomarkers for Nonpersistent Chemicals in Environmental Epidemiology. Environ. Health Perspect. 2015, 123, A166A168,  DOI: 10.1289/ehp.1510041
    78. 78
      Kwiatkowski, C. F.; Andrews, D. Q.; Birnbaum, L. S.; Bruton, T. A.; DeWitt, J. C.; Knappe, D. R. U.; Maffini, M. V.; Miller, M. F.; Pelch, K. E.; Reade, A.; Soehl, A.; Trier, X.; Venier, M.; Wagner, C. C.; Wang, Z.; Blum, A. Scientific Basis for Managing PFAS as a Chemical Class. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 2020, 7, 532543,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.estlett.0c00255
    79. 79
      Bălan, S. A.; Mathrani, V. C.; Guo, D. F.; Algazi, A. M. Regulating PFAS as a Chemical Class under the California Safer Consumer Products Program. Environ. Health Perspect. 2021, 129, 25001  DOI: 10.1289/EHP7431
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information


    The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.1c08942.

    • Additional descriptive information and quality control analysis results (PDF)

    • Additional chemical information and statistical analysis results (XLSX)


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.