Maximizing Realism: Mapping Plastic Particles at the Ocean Surface Using Mixtures of Normal DistributionsClick to copy article linkArticle link copied!
- Lise M. Alkema*Lise M. Alkema*Email: [email protected]Aquatic Ecology and Water Quality Management Group, Wageningen University, P.O. Box 47, 6700 DDWageningen, The NetherlandsMore by Lise M. Alkema
- Caspar J. Van LissaCaspar J. Van LissaDepartment Methodology and Statistics, Tilburg University, PO Box 90153, 5000 LETilburg, The NetherlandsMore by Caspar J. Van Lissa
- Merel KooiMerel KooiAquatic Ecology and Water Quality Management Group, Wageningen University, P.O. Box 47, 6700 DDWageningen, The NetherlandsMore by Merel Kooi
- Albert A. KoelmansAlbert A. KoelmansAquatic Ecology and Water Quality Management Group, Wageningen University, P.O. Box 47, 6700 DDWageningen, The NetherlandsMore by Albert A. Koelmans
Abstract
Current methods of characterizing plastic debris use arbitrary, predetermined categorizations and assume that the properties of particles are independent. Here we introduce Gaussian mixture models (GMM), a technique suitable for describing non-normal multivariate distributions, as a method to identify mutually exclusive subsets of floating macroplastic and microplastic particles (latent class analysis) based on statistically defensible categories. Length, width, height and polymer type of 6,942 particles and items from the Atlantic Ocean were measured using infrared spectroscopy and image analysis. GMM revealed six underlying normal distributions based on length and width; two within each of the lines, films, and fragments categories. These classes differed significantly in polymer types. The results further showed that smaller films and fragments had a higher correlation between length and width, indicating that they were about the same size in two dimensions. In contrast, larger films and fragments showed low correlations of height with length and width. This demonstrates that larger particles show greater variability in shape and thus plastic fragmentation is associated with particle rounding. These results offer important opportunities for refinement of risk assessment and for modeling the fragmentation and distribution of plastic in the ocean. They further illustrate that GMM is a useful method to map ocean plastics, with advantages over approaches that use arbitrary categorizations and assume size independence or normal distributions.
This publication is licensed under
License Summary*
You are free to share(copy and redistribute) this article in any medium or format and to adapt(remix, transform, and build upon) the material for any purpose, even commercially within the parameters below:
Creative Commons (CC): This is a Creative Commons license.
Attribution (BY): Credit must be given to the creator.
*Disclaimer
This summary highlights only some of the key features and terms of the actual license. It is not a license and has no legal value. Carefully review the actual license before using these materials.
License Summary*
You are free to share(copy and redistribute) this article in any medium or format and to adapt(remix, transform, and build upon) the material for any purpose, even commercially within the parameters below:
Creative Commons (CC): This is a Creative Commons license.
Attribution (BY): Credit must be given to the creator.
*Disclaimer
This summary highlights only some of the key features and terms of the actual license. It is not a license and has no legal value. Carefully review the actual license before using these materials.
License Summary*
You are free to share(copy and redistribute) this article in any medium or format and to adapt(remix, transform, and build upon) the material for any purpose, even commercially within the parameters below:
Creative Commons (CC): This is a Creative Commons license.
Attribution (BY): Credit must be given to the creator.
*Disclaimer
This summary highlights only some of the key features and terms of the actual license. It is not a license and has no legal value. Carefully review the actual license before using these materials.
Synopsis
Latent class analysis of marine macro- and microplastic particles increases realism in describing classes of particles relative to previous predetermined and arbitrary classifications.
Introduction
Methods
Sampling Locations, Sampling Method, and Quality Control
Figure 1
Figure 1. Plastic concentration per sample (particles/L) along our sampling route. The green color marks samples used for present GMM analysis. Red color marks samples not considered suitable for the GMM analysis, due to inconsistent sample conditions.
Laboratory Analysis
Polymer Type
Particle Length, Width, and Height
Data Analysis (GMM)
Strategy of GMM Analysis
Results and Discussion
Plastics in the North Atlantic and North Sea
Figure 2
Figure 2. Particle concentration per sample (histogram) and mass concentration (yellow data points). Largest concentrations are found in the center of the North Atlantic (20°N–50°N), lower concentrations are found the North Atlantic Current (51°N–56°N), and in the North Sea (58°N). The outlier in mass concentration was caused by a bottle cap.
Separate Gaussian Mixture Models for Each Dimensionality Category
Lines
Figure 3
Figure 3. Comparison of mixture models for the length of lines (value; mm), estimating 1 to 5 classes with varying means and variances. Headers indicate the number of classes used in the mixture model. A 2-class solution is chosen, which shows one class of smaller lines, and one class of significantly larger lines. Large lines show a relatively high abundance.
Film
Fragments
Figure 4
Figure 4. Mixture model of fragments with free means and variances, and fixed covariances. A 2-class solution shows a large class with a length that is relatively equal to width (strong correlation), and a smaller class with a length that is substantially different from width (weak correlation), indicating heterogeneity of shape for large fragments, and homogeneity of shape for small fragments. Length and width in mm.
Classifying Floating Marine Debris through Gaussian Mixture Modeling
Parameter | Value (mm) | 95% CI | Class |
---|---|---|---|
Mlength | 9.32* | [8.20, 10.44] | Line 1 (N = 289) |
slength2 | 19.87* | [10.08, 29.65] | |
Mlength | 32.36* | [29.66, 35.06] | Line 2 (N = 195) |
slength2 | 312.35* | [247.17, 337.52] | |
rlength,width | 0.86* | [0.84, 0.88] | Film 1 (N = 714) |
Mlength | 2.95* | [2.63, 3.26] | |
Mwidth | 1.81* | [1.57, 2.05] | |
slength2 | 1.70* | [1.25, 2.15] | |
swidth2 | 0.63* | [0.49, 0.76] | |
rlength,width | 0.08* | [0.05, 0.12] | Film 2 (N = 139) |
Mlength | 9.29* | [8.50, 6.12] | |
Mwidth | 5.60* | [5.08, 6.12] | |
slength2 | 14.11* | [8.68, 19.55] | |
swidth2 | 7.89* | [5.25, 10.54] | |
rlength,width | 0.91* | [0.88, 0.94] | Fragment 1 (N = 4338) |
Mlength | 2.21* | [1.93, 2.48] | |
Mwidth | 1.55* | [1.36, 1.73] | |
slength2 | 0.63* | [0.32, 0.95] | |
swidth2 | 0.31* | [0.15, 0.46] | |
rlength,width | 0.15* | [0.07, 0.23] | Fragment 2 (N = 1267) |
Mlength | 5.29* | [4.69, 5.89] | |
Mwidth | 3.44* | [3.15, 3.73] | |
slength2 | 5.36* | [−2.56, 13.28] | |
swidth2 | 1.35* | [0.91, 1.80] |
M: Mean; s2, variance; r, correlation. * = p < 0.001.
Length, Width, and Shape Category
Observed Height
Polymer Type by Class
Figure 5
Figure 5. Proportion of polymer types by latent class. There are significant differences across all classes for all three polymer types, implying that the classes differed significantly from one another with respect to polymer composition.
General Discussion and Prospect
Benefits of GMM
Limitations
Advancing the Risk Assessment of Microplastic Particles
Supporting Information
The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.2c03559.
Sampling conditions and overall count; abundancies and frequencies of categories per polymer type; abundancies and frequencies of shape categories; findings for polymer type category “other”; polymer type libraries; manual length and width measurements versus Ferrets diameter and bounding rectangle measurements; line classification; film classification; fragment classification; comparison of Ferrets diameter with bounding rectangle diameter; density distribution for particle length for film, fragment and line; density distribution for particle width; mixture model of film (2 class solution); mixture model of film (3 class solution); mixture model of fragments (3 class solution) (PDF)
Terms & Conditions
Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge Bark Europa and The Ocean Cleanup for material support of this research.
References
This article references 51 other publications.
- 1Science Advice for Policy by European Academies. A Scientific Perspective on Microplastics in Nature and Society; SAPEA: Berlin, 2019.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 2Microplastics in drinking-water; World Health Organization: Geneva, 2019. License: CC-BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 3Law, K. L. Plastics in the Marine Environment. Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci. 2017, 9, 205– 209, DOI: 10.1146/annurev-marine-010816-060409Google Scholar3Plastics in the Marine EnvironmentLaw Kara LavenderAnnual review of marine science (2017), 9 (), 205-229 ISSN:.Plastics contamination in the marine environment was first reported nearly 50 years ago, less than two decades after the rise of commercial plastics production, when less than 50 million metric tons were produced per year. In 2014, global plastics production surpassed 300 million metric tons per year. Plastic debris has been detected worldwide in all major marine habitats, in sizes from microns to meters. In response, concerns about risks to marine wildlife upon exposure to the varied forms of plastic debris have increased, stimulating new research into the extent and consequences of plastics contamination in the marine environment. Here, I present a framework to evaluate the current understanding of the sources, distribution, fate, and impacts of marine plastics. Despite remaining knowledge gaps in mass budgeting and challenges in investigating ecological impacts, the increasing evidence of the ubiquity of plastics contamination in the marine environment, the continued rapid growth in plastics production, and the evidence-albeit limited-of demonstrated impacts to marine wildlife support immediate implementation of source-reducing measures to decrease the potential risks of plastics in the marine ecosystem.
- 4Xanthos, D.; Walker, T. R. International policies to reduce plastic marine pollution from single-use plastics (plastic bags and microbeads): A review. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2017, 118 (1–2), 17– 26, DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.02.048Google Scholar4International policies to reduce plastic marine pollution from single-use plastics (plastic bags and microbeads): A reviewXanthos, Dirk; Walker, Tony R.Marine Pollution Bulletin (2017), 118 (1-2), 17-26CODEN: MPNBAZ; ISSN:0025-326X. (Elsevier Ltd.)Marine plastic pollution has been a growing concern for decades. Single-use plastics (plastic bags and microbeads) are a significant source of this pollution. Although research outlining environmental, social, and economic impacts of marine plastic pollution is growing, few studies have examd. policy and legislative tools to reduce plastic pollution, particularly single-use plastics (plastic bags and microbeads). This paper reviews current international market-based strategies and policies to reduce plastic bags and microbeads. While policies to reduce microbeads began in 2014, interventions for plastic bags began much earlier in 1991. However, few studies have documented or measured the effectiveness of these redn. strategies. Recommendations to further reduce single-use plastic marine pollution include: (i) research to evaluate effectiveness of bans and levies to ensure policies are having pos. impacts on marine environments; and (ii) education and outreach to reduce consumption of plastic bags and microbeads at source.
- 5Vince, J.; Hardesty, B. D. Plastic pollution challenges in marine and coastal environments. From local to global governance. Restor. Ecol. 2017, 25, 123– 12, DOI: 10.1111/rec.12388Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 6Syberg, K.; Nielsen, M. B.; Westergaard Clausen, L. P.; van Calster, G.; van Wezel, A.; Rochman, C.; Koelmans, A. A.; Cronin, R.; Pahl, S.; Hansen, S. F. Regulation of plastic from a circular economy perspective. Curr. Opin. Green Sustain. Chem. 2021, 29, 100462, DOI: 10.1016/j.cogsc.2021.100462Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 7Hartmann, N. B.; Hüffer, T.; Thompson, R. C.; Hassellöv, M.; Verschoor, A.; Daugaard, A. E.; Rist, S.; Karlsson, T.; Brennholt, N.; Cole, M.; Herrling, M. P.; Hess, M. C.; Ivleva, N. P.; Lusher, A. L.; Wagner, M. Are We Speaking the Same Language? Recommendations for a Definition and Categorization Framework for Plastic Debris. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 53, 1039– 1047, DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.8b05297Google Scholar7Are We Speaking the Same Language? Recommendations for a Definition and Categorization Framework for Plastic DebrisHartmann, Nanna B.; Huffer, Thorsten; Thompson, Richard C.; Hassellov, Martin; Verschoor, Anja; Daugaard, Anders E.; Rist, Sinja; Karlsson, Therese; Brennholt, Nicole; Cole, Matthew; Herrling, Maria P.; Hess, Maren C.; Ivleva, Natalia P.; Lusher, Amy L.; Wagner, MartinEnvironmental Science & Technology (2019), 53 (3), 1039-1047CODEN: ESTHAG; ISSN:0013-936X. (American Chemical Society)A review is given. The accumulation of plastic litter in natural environments is a global issue. Concerns over potential neg. impacts on the economy, wildlife, and human health provide strong incentives for improving the sustainable use of plastics. Despite the many voices raised on the issue, we lack a consensus on how to define and categorize plastic debris. This is evident for microplastics, where inconsistent size classes are used and where the materials to be included are under debate. While this is inherent in an emerging research field, an ambiguous terminol. results in confusion and miscommunication that may compromise progress in research and mitigation measures. Therefore, we need to be explicit on what exactly we consider plastic debris. Thus, we critically discuss the advantages and disadvantages of a unified terminol., propose a definition and categorization framework, and highlight areas of uncertainty. Going beyond size classes, our framework includes physicochem. properties (polymer compn., solid state, soly.) as defining criteria and size, shape, color, and origin as classifiers for categorization. Acknowledging the rapid evolution of our knowledge on plastic pollution, our framework will promote consensus building within the scientific and regulatory community based on a solid scientific foundation.
- 8Rochman, C. M.; Brookson, C.; Bikker, J.; Djuric, N.; Earn, A.; Bucci, K.; Athey, S.; Huntington, A.; McIlwraith, H.; Munno, K.; De Frond, H.; Kolomijeca, A.; Erdle, L.; Grbic, J.; Bayoumi, M.; Borrelle, S. B.; Wu, T.; Santoro, S.; Werbowski, L. M.; Zhu, X.; Giles, R. K.; Hamilton, B. M.; Thaysen, C.; Kaura, A.; Klasios, N.; Ead, L.; Kim, J.; Sherlock, C.; Ho, A.; Hung, C. Rethinking microplastics as a diverse contaminant suite. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2019, 38, 703– 711, DOI: 10.1002/etc.4371Google Scholar8Rethinking microplastics as a diverse contaminant suiteRochman, Chelsea M.; Brookson, Cole; Bikker, Jacqueline; Djuric, Natasha; Earn, Arielle; Bucci, Kennedy; Athey, Samantha; Huntington, Aimee; McIlwraith, Hayley; Munno, Keenan; De Frond, Hannah; Kolomijeca, Anna; Erdle, Lisa; Grbic, Jelena; Bayoumi, Malak; Borrelle, Stephanie B.; Wu, Tina; Santoro, Samantha; Werbowski, Larissa M.; Zhu, Xia; Giles, Rachel K.; Hamilton, Bonnie M.; Thaysen, Clara; Kaura, Ashima; Klasios, Natasha; Ead, Lauren; Kim, Joel; Sherlock, Cassandra; Ho, Annissa; Hung, CharlotteEnvironmental Toxicology and Chemistry (2019), 38 (4), 703-711CODEN: ETOCDK; ISSN:0730-7268. (Wiley-Blackwell)There is no expanded citation for this reference.
- 9Koelmans, A. A.; Redondo-Hasselerharm, P. E; Mohamed Nor, N. H.; Kooi, M. Solving the non-alignment of methods and approaches used in microplastic research in order to consistently characterize risk. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020, 54 (19), 12307– 12315, DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.0c02982Google Scholar9Solving the nonalignment of methods and approaches used in microplastic research to consistently characterize riskKoelmans, Albert A.; Redondo-Hasselerharm, Paula E.; Mohamed Nor, Nur Hazimah; Kooi, MerelEnvironmental Science & Technology (2020), 54 (19), 12307-12315CODEN: ESTHAG; ISSN:0013-936X. (American Chemical Society)The lack of std. approaches in microplastic research limits progress in the abatement of plastic pollution. Here, we propose and test rescaling methods that are able to improve the alignment of methods used in microplastic research. We describe a method to correct for the differences in size ranges as used by studies reporting microplastic concns. and demonstrate how this reduces the variation in aq.-phase concns. caused by method differences. We provide a method to interchange between no., vol., and mass concns. using probability d. functions that represent environmental microplastic. Finally, we use this method to correct for the incompatibility of data as used in current species sensitivity distributions (SSDs), caused by differences in the microplastic types used in effect studies and those in nature. We derived threshold effect concns. from such a cor. SSD for freshwater species. Comparison of the rescaled exposure concns. and threshold effect concns. reveals that the latter would be exceeded for 1.5% of the known surface water exposure concns. worldwide. Altogether, this toolset allows us to correct for the diversity of microplastic, to address it in a common language, and to assess its risks as one environmental material.
- 10Kooi, M.; Koelmans, A. A. Simplifying microplastic via continuous probability distributions for size, shape and density. Environ. Sci. Technol. Letters 2019, 6, 551– 557, DOI: 10.1021/acs.estlett.9b00379Google Scholar10Simplifying Microplastic via Continuous Probability Distributions for Size, Shape, and DensityKooi, Merel; Koelmans, Albert A.Environmental Science & Technology Letters (2019), 6 (9), 551-557CODEN: ESTLCU; ISSN:2328-8930. (American Chemical Society)Because of their diverse sizes, shapes, and densities, environmental microplastics are often perceived as complex. Many studies struggle with this complexity and either address only a part of this diversity or present data using discrete classifications for sizes, shapes, and densities. We argue that such classifications will never be fully satisfactory, as any definition using classes does not capture the essentially continuous nature of environmental microplastic. Therefore, we propose to simplify microplastics by fully defining them through a three-dimensional (3D) probability distribution, with size, shape, and d. as dimensions. In addn. to introducing the concept, we parametrize these probability distributions, using empirical data. This parametrization results in an approx. yet realistic representation of "true" environmental microplastic. This approach to simplifying microplastic could be applicable to exposure measurements, effect studies, and fate modeling. Furthermore, it allows for easy comparison between studies, irresp. of sampling or lab. setup. We demonstrate how the 3D probability distribution of environmental vs. ingested microplastic can be helpful in understanding the bioavailability of and exposure to microplastic. We argue that the concept of simplified microplastic will also be helpful in probabilistic risk modeling, which would greatly enhance our understanding of the risk that microplastics pose to the environment.
- 11Koelmans, A. A.; Besseling, E.; Foekema, E.; Kooi, M.; Mintenig, S.; Ossendorp, B. C.; Redondo-Hasselerharm, P. E.; Verschoor, A.; van Wezel, A. P.; Scheffer, M. Risks of Plastic Debris: Unravelling fact, opinion, perception and belief. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 51, 11513– 11519, DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.7b02219Google Scholar11Risks of Plastic Debris: Unravelling Fact, Opinion, Perception, and BeliefKoelmans, Albert A.; Besseling, Ellen; Foekema, Edwin; Kooi, Merel; Mintenig, Svenja; Ossendorp, Bernadette C.; Redondo-Hasselerharm, Paula E.; Verschoor, Anja; van Wezel, Annemarie P.; Scheffer, MartenEnvironmental Science & Technology (2017), 51 (20), 11513-11519CODEN: ESTHAG; ISSN:0013-936X. (American Chemical Society)Researcher and media alarms caused plastic debris to be perceived as a major threat to humans and animals; however, although wasting plastics in the environment is clearly undesirable for aesthetic and economic reasons, actual environmental risks of different plastics and their assocd. chems. is largely unknown. This work showed how a systematic assessment of adverse outcome pathways based on ecol. relevant metrics for exposure and effect can bring risk assessment within reach. Results will help respond to the current public concern in a balanced way and allow policy-makers to take measures using scientifically sound reasons.
- 12Koelmans, A. A.; Redondo-Hasselerharm, P. E.; Mohamed Nor, N. H.; de Ruijter, V. N.; Mintenig, S. M.; Kooi, M. Risk Assessment of Microplastic Particles. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2022, 7, 138– 152, DOI: 10.1038/s41578-021-00411-yGoogle ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 13Cowger, W.; Booth, A. M.; Hamilton, B. M.; Thaysen, C.; Primpke, S.; Munno, K.; Lusher, A. L.; Dehaut, A.; Vaz, V. P.; Liboiron, M.; Devriese, L. I.; Hermabessiere, L.; Rochman, C.; Athey, S. N.; Lynch, J. M.; De Frond, H.; Gray, A.; Jones, O. A. H.; Brander, S.; Steele, C.; Moore, S.; Sanchez, A.; Nel, H. Reporting Guidelines to Increase the Reproducibility and Comparability of Research on Microplastics. Appl. Spectrosc. 2020, 74, 1066– 1077, DOI: 10.1177/0003702820930292Google Scholar13Reporting Guidelines to Increase the Reproducibility and Comparability of Research on MicroplasticsCowger, Win; Booth, Andy M.; Hamilton, Bonnie M.; Thaysen, Clara; Primpke, Sebastian; Munno, Keenan; Lusher, Amy L.; Dehaut, Alexandre; Vaz, Vitor P.; Liboiron, Max; Devriese, Lisa I.; Hermabessiere, Ludovic; Rochman, Chelsea; Athey, Samantha N.; Lynch, Jennifer M.; De Frond, Hannah; Gray, Andrew; Jones, Oliver A. H.; Brander, Susanne; Steele, Clare; Moore, Shelly; Sanchez, Alterra; Nel, HollyApplied Spectroscopy (2020), 74 (9), 1066-1077CODEN: APSPA4; ISSN:0003-7028. (Sage Publications)A review. The ubiquitous pollution of the environment with microplastics, a diverse suite of contaminants, is of growing concern for science and currently receives considerable public, political, and academic attention. The potential impact of microplastics in the environment has prompted a great deal of research in recent years. Many diverse methods have been developed to answer different questions about microplastic pollution, from sources, transport, and fate in the environment, and about effects on humans and wildlife. These methods are often insufficiently described, making studies neither comparable nor reproducible. The proliferation of new microplastic investigations and cross-study syntheses to answer larger scale questions are hampered. This diverse group of 23 researchers think these issues can begin to be overcome through the adoption of a set of reporting guidelines. This collaboration was created using an open science framework that we detail for future use. Here, we suggest harmonized reporting guidelines for microplastic studies in environmental and lab. settings through all steps of a typical study, including best practices for reporting materials, quality assurance/quality control, data, field sampling, sample prepn., microplastic identification, microplastic categorization, microplastic quantification, and considerations for toxicol. studies. We developed three easy to use documents, a detailed document, a checklist, and a mind map, that can be used to ref. the reporting guidelines quickly. We intend that these reporting guidelines support the annotation, dissemination, interpretation, reviewing, and synthesis of microplastic research. Through open access licensing (CC BY 4.0), these documents aim to increase the validity, reproducibility, and comparability of studies in this field for the benefit of the global community.
- 14Mohamed Nor, N. H.; Kooi, M.; Diepens, N. J.; Koelmans, A. A. Lifetime accumulation of nano- and microplastic in children and adults. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2021, 55, 5084– 5096, DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.0c07384Google Scholar14Lifetime Accumulation of Microplastic in Children and AdultsMohamed Nor, Nur Hazimah; Kooi, Merel; Diepens, Noel J.; Koelmans, Albert A.Environmental Science & Technology (2021), 55 (8), 5084-5096CODEN: ESTHAG; ISSN:0013-936X. (American Chemical Society)Human exposure to microplastic is recognized as a global problem, but the uncertainty, variability, and lifetime accumulation are unresolved. We provide a probabilistic lifetime exposure model for children and adults, which accounts for intake via eight food types and inhalation, intestinal absorption, biliary excretion, and plastic-assocd. chem. exposure via a physiol. based pharmacokinetic submodel. The model probabilistically simulates microplastic concns. in the gut, body tissue, and stool, the latter allowing validation against empirical data. Rescaling methods were used to ensure comparability between microplastic abundance data. Microplastic (1-5000μm) median intake rates are 553 particles/capita/day (184 ng/capita/day) and 883 particles/capita/day (583 ng/capita/day) for children and adults, resp. This intake can irreversibly accumulate to 8.32 × 103 (90% CI, 7.08 × 102-1.91 × 106) particles/capita or 6.4 (90% CI, 0.1-2.31 × 103) ng/capita for children until age 18, and up to 5.01 × 104 (90% CI, 5.25 × 103-9.33 × 106) particles/capita or 40.7 (90% CI, 0.8-9.85 × 103) ng/capita for adults until age 70 in the body tissue for 1-10μm particles. Simulated microplastic concns. in stool agree with empirical data. Chem. absorption from food and ingested microplastic of the nine intake media based on biphasic, reversible, and size-specific sorption kinetics, reveals that the contribution of microplastics to total chem. intake is small. The as-yet-unknown contributions of other food types are discussed in light of future research needs.
- 15Kooi, M.; Primpke, S.; Mintenig, S. M.; Lorenz, C.; Gerdts, G.; Koelmans, A. A. Characterizing microplastics across environmental compartments. Water Res. 2021, 202, 117429, DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2021.117429Google Scholar15Characterizing the multidimensionality of microplastics across environmental compartmentsKooi, Merel; Primpke, Sebastian; Mintenig, Svenja M.; Lorenz, Claudia; Gerdts, Gunnar; Koelmans, Albert A.Water Research (2021), 202 (), 117429CODEN: WATRAG; ISSN:0043-1354. (Elsevier Ltd.)Understanding the multidimensionality of microplastics is essential for a realistic assessment of the risks these particles pose to the environment and human health. Here, we capture size, shape, area, polymer, vol. and mass characteristics of >60,000 individual microplastic particles as continuous distributions. Particles originate from samples taken from different aquatic compartments, including surface water and sediments from the marine and freshwater environment, waste water effluents, and freshwater organisms. Data were obtained using state-of-the-art FTIR-imaging, using the same automated imaging post-processing software. We introduce a workflow with two quality criteria that assure minimumdata quality loss due to volumetric and filter area subsampling. We find that probability d. functions (PDFs) for particle length follow power law distributions, with median slopes ranging from 2.2 for marine surface water to 3.1 for biota samples, and that these slopes were compartment-specific. Polymer-specific PDFs for particle length demonstrated significant differences in slopes among polymers, hinting at polymer specific sources, removal or fragmentation processes. Furthermore, we provide PDFs for particle width, width to length ratio, area, sp. surface area, vol. and mass distributions and propose how these can represent the full diversity of toxicol. relevant dose metrics required for the assessment of microplastic risks.
- 16Mehinto, A. C.; Coffin, S.; Koelmans, A. A.; Brander, S. M.; Wagner, M.; Thornton Hampton, L. M.; Burton, G. A.; Miller, E.; Gouin, T.; Weisberg, S. B.; Rochman, C. M. Risk-Based Management Framework for Microplastics in Aquatic Ecosystems. Microplast. Nanoplast. 2022, 17, DOI: 10.1186/s43591-022-00033-3Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 17Coffin, S.; Weisberg, S. B.; Rochman, C. M.; Kooi, M.; Koelmans, A. A. Risk Characterization of Microplastics in San Francisco Bay, California. Micropl.&Nanopl. 2022, 2, 19, DOI: 10.1186/s43591-022-00037-zGoogle ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 18Redondo-Hasselerharm, P. E.; Rico, A.; Koelmans, A. A. Risk assessment of microplastics in freshwater benthic ecosystems guided by strict quality criteria and data alignment methods. J. Hazard. Mater. 2023, 441, 129814, DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.129814Google Scholar18Risk assessment of microplastics in freshwater sediments guided by strict quality criteria and data alignment methodsRedondo-Hasselerharm, Paula E.; Rico, Andreu; Koelmans, Albert A.Journal of Hazardous Materials (2023), 441 (), 129814CODEN: JHMAD9; ISSN:0304-3894. (Elsevier B.V.)Detg. the risks of microplastics is difficult because data is of variable quality and cannot be compared. Although sediments are important sinks for microplastics, no holistic risk assessment framework is available for this compartment. Here we assess the risks of microplastics in freshwater sediments worldwide, using strict quality criteria and alignment methods. Published exposure data were screened for quality using new criteria for microplastics in sediment and were rescaled to the std. 1-5000 μm microplastic size range. Threshold effect data were also screened for quality and were aligned to account for the polydispersity of environmental microplastics and for their bioaccessible fraction. Risks were characterized for effects triggered by food diln. or translocation, using ingested particle vol. and surface area as ecol. relevant metrics, resp. Based on species sensitivity distributions, we detd. Hazardous Concns. for 5% of the species (HC5, with 95% CI) of 4.9 x 109 (6.6 x 107 - 1.9 x 1011) and 1.1 x 1010 (3.2 x 108 - 4.0 x 1011) particles / kg sediment dry wt., for food diln. and translocation, resp. For all locations considered, exposure concns. were either below or in the margin of uncertainty of the HC5 values. We conclude that risks from microplastics to benthic communities cannot be excluded at current concns. in sediments worldwide.
- 19Scotto Rosato, N.; Baer, J. C. Latent Class Analysis: A Method for Capturing Heterogeneity. Social Work Research 2012, 36, 61– 69, DOI: 10.1093/swr/svs006Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 20Doveton, J. H.; Chang, T. Latent Facies Mapping from Binary Geological Data. J. Geol. 1991, 99, 299, DOI: 10.1086/629490Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 21Hendryx, M.; Luo, J. Latent class analysis of the association between polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon exposures and body mass index. Environ. Internat. 2018, 121, 227– 231, DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2018.09.016Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 22de Ruijter, V. N.; Redondo-Hasselerharm, P. E.; Gouin, T.; Koelmans, A. A. 2020. Quality criteria for microplastic effect studies in the context of risk assessment: A critical review. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020, 54 (19), 11692– 11705, DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.0c03057Google Scholar22Quality criteria for microplastic effect studies in the context of risk assessment: A critical reviewde Ruijter, Vera N.; Redondo-Hasselerharm, Paula E.; Gouin, Todd; Koelmans, Albert A.Environmental Science & Technology (2020), 54 (19), 11692-11705CODEN: ESTHAG; ISSN:0013-936X. (American Chemical Society)A review. In the literature, there is widespread consensus that methods in plastic research need improvement. Current limitations in quality assurance and harmonization prevent progress in our understanding of the true effects of microplastic in the environment. Following the recent development of quality assessment methods for studies reporting concns. in biota and water samples, we propose a method to assess the quality of microplastic effect studies. We reviewed 105 microplastic effect studies with aquatic biota, provided a systematic overview of their characteristics, developed 20 quality criteria in four main criteria categories (particle characterization, exptl. design, applicability in risk assessment, and ecol. relevance), propose a protocol for future effect studies with particles, and, finally, used all the information to define the wt. of evidence with respect to demonstrated effect mechanisms. On av., studies scored 44.6% (range 20-77.5%) of the max. score. No study scored pos. on all criteria, reconfirming the urgent need for better quality assurance. Most urgent recommendations for improvement relate to avoiding and verifying background contamination, and to improving the environmental relevance of exposure conditions. The majority of the studies (86.7%) evaluated on particle characteristics properly, nonetheless it should be underlined that by failing to provide characteristics of the particles, an entire expt. can become irreproducible. Studies addressed environmentally realistic polymer types fairly well; however, there was a mismatch between sizes tested and those targeted when analyzing microplastic in environmental samples. In far too many instances, studies suggest and speculate mechanisms that are poorly supported by the design and reporting of data in the study. This represents a problem for decision-makers and needs to be minimized in future research. In their papers, authors frame 10 effects mechanisms as "suggested", whereas 7 of them are framed as "demonstrated". When accounting for the quality of the studies according to our assessment, three of these mechanisms remained. These are inhibition of food assimilation and/or decreased nutritional value of food, internal phys. damage, and external phys. damage. We recommend that risk assessment addresses these mechanisms with higher priority.
- 23Lenz, R.; Enders, K.; Stedmon, C. A.; Mackenzie, D. M. A.; Nielsen, T. G. A critical assessment of visual identification of marine microplastic using Raman spectroscopy for analysis improvement. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2015, 100, 82– 91, DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.09.026Google Scholar23A critical assessment of visual identification of marine microplastic using Raman spectroscopy for analysis improvementLenz, Robin; Enders, Kristina; Stedmon, Colin A.; MacKenzie, David M. A.; Nielsen, Torkel GisselMarine Pollution Bulletin (2015), 100 (1), 82-91CODEN: MPNBAZ; ISSN:0025-326X. (Elsevier Ltd.)Identification and characterization of microplastic (MP) is a necessary step to evaluate their concns., chem. compn. and interactions with biota. MP ≥ 10 μm diam. filtered from below the sea surface in the European and subtropical North Atlantic were simultaneously identified by visual microscopy and Raman micro-spectroscopy. Visually identified particles below 100 μm had a significantly lower percentage confirmed by Raman than larger ones indicating that visual identification alone is inappropriate for studies on small microplastics. Sixty-eight percent of visually counted MP (n = 1279) were spectroscopically confirmed being plastic. The percentage varied with type, color and size of the MP. Fibers had a higher success rate (75%) than particles (64%). We tested Raman micro-spectroscopy applicability for MP identification with respect to varying chem. compn. (additives), degrdn. state and org. matter coating. Partially UV-degraded post-consumer plastics provided identifiable Raman spectra for polymers most common among marine MP, i.e. polyethylene and polypropylene.
- 24Rocha-Santos, T.; Duarte, A. C. A critical overview of the analytical approaches to the occurrence, the fate and the behaviour of microplastics in the environment. TrAC Trends Analyt. Chem. 2015, 65, 47– 53, DOI: 10.1016/j.trac.2014.10.011Google Scholar24A critical overview of the analytical approaches to the occurrence, the fate and the behavior of microplastics in the environmentRocha-Santos, Teresa; Duarte, Armando C.TrAC, Trends in Analytical Chemistry (2015), 65 (), 47-53CODEN: TTAEDJ; ISSN:0165-9936. (Elsevier B. V.)A review. Plastics can be found in food packaging, shopping bags, and household items, such as toothbrushes and pens, and facial cleansers. Due to the high disposability and low recovery of discharged materials, plastics materials have become debris accumulating in the environment. Microplastics have a dimension <5 mm and possess physico-chem. properties (e.g., size, d., color and chem. compn.) that are key contributors to their bioavailability to organisms. This review addresses the anal. approaches to characterization and quantification of microplastics in the environment and discusses recent studies on their occurrence, fate, and behavior. This crit. overview includes a general assessment of sampling and sample handling, and compares methods for morphol. and phys. classification, and methodologies for chem. characterization and quantification of the microplastics. Finally, this review addresses the advantages and the disadvantages of these techniques, and comments on future applications and potential research interest within this field.
- 25Pasquier, G.; Doyen, P.; Kazour, M.; Dehaut, A.; Diop, M.; Duflos, G.; Amara, R. Manta Net: The Golden Method for Sampling Surface Water Microplastics in Aquatic Environments. Front. Environ. Sci. 2022, 10, 811112, DOI: 10.3389/fenvs.2022.811112Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 26Masoumi, H.; Safavi, S. M.; Khani, Z. Identification and Classification of Plastic Resins using Near Infrared Reflectance Spectroscopy. Int. J. Mech. Ind. Eng. 2012, 6, 877– 884Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 27Zhu, S.; Chen, H.; Wang, M.; Guo, X.; Lei, Y.; Jin, G. Plastic solid waste identification system based on near infrared spectroscopy in combination with support vector machine. Adv. Ind. Eng. Polym. Res. 2019, 2, 77– 81, DOI: 10.1016/j.aiepr.2019.04.001Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 28Xia, J.; Huang, Y.; Li, Q.; Xiong, Y.; Min, S. Convolutional neural network with near-infrared spectroscopy for plastic discrimination. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2021, 19, 3547– 3555, DOI: 10.1007/s10311-021-01240-9Google Scholar28Convolutional neural network with near-infrared spectroscopy for plastic discriminationXia, Jingjing; Huang, Yue; Li, Qianqian; Xiong, Yanmei; Min, ShungengEnvironmental Chemistry Letters (2021), 19 (5), 3547-3555CODEN: ECLNBJ; ISSN:1610-3653. (Springer)Plastic pollution is a global issue of increasing health concern, thus requiring innovative waste management. In particular, there is a need for advanced methods to identify and classify the different types of plastics. Near-IR spectroscopy is currently operational in some waste-sorting facilities, yet remains challenging to discriminate different black plastics because black targets have low reflectance in some spectral regions. Here we used partial least squares discrimination anal., soft independent modeling of class analogy, linear discriminant anal. and convolutional neural network to classify the plastics. We analyzed 159 plastic samples, including 84 black plastics, made of high impact polystyrene, acrylonitrile butadiene styrene, high-d. polyethylene, polyethylene terephthalate, polyamide 66, polycarbonate and polypropylene. Results show that the convolutional neural network model yielded an accuracy up to 98%, whereas other models displayed accuracy of 57-70%. Overall, convolutional neural network anal. of IR plastic data is promising to solve the bottleneck problem of black plastic discrimination.
- 29Schneider, C. A.; Rasband, W. S.; Eliceiri, K. W. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat. Methods 2012, 9, 671– 675, PMID 22930834 DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.2089Google Scholar29NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysisSchneider, Caroline A.; Rasband, Wayne S.; Eliceiri, Kevin W.Nature Methods (2012), 9 (7_part1), 671-675CODEN: NMAEA3; ISSN:1548-7091. (Nature Publishing Group)For the past 25 years NIH Image and ImageJ software have been pioneers as open tools for the anal. of scientific images. We discuss the origins, challenges and solns. of these two programs, and how their history can serve to advise and inform other software projects.
- 30ImageJ Macro Reference Guide. https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/docs/macro_reference_guide.pdf (accessed 01–08–2019).Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 31Tabachnick, B. G.; Fidell, L. S.; Ullman, J. B. Using multivariate statistics, 7th ed.; Pearson: New York NY, 2019; 815 pages.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 32Geun Kim, M. Multivariate outliers and decompositions of Mahalanobis distance. Commun. Stat. Theory Methods. 2000, 29, 1511– 1526, DOI: 10.1080/03610920008832559Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 33Nylund, K. L.; Asparouhov, T.; Muthén, B. O. Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Struct. Equ. Modeling 2007, 14, 535– 569, DOI: 10.1080/10705510701575396Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 34Van de Schoot, R. Latent trajectory studies: The basics, how to interpret the results, and what to report. Eur. J. Psychotraumatol. 2015, 6, 27514, DOI: 10.3402/ejpt.v6.27514Google Scholar34Latent trajectory studies: the basics, how to interpret the results, and what to reportvan de Schoot Rens; van de Schoot RensEuropean journal of psychotraumatology (2015), 6 (), 27514 ISSN:2000-8066.BACKGROUND: In statistics, tools have been developed to estimate individual change over time. Also, the existence of latent trajectories, where individuals are captured by trajectories that are unobserved (latent), can be evaluated (Muthen & Muthen, 2000). The method used to evaluate such trajectories is called Latent Growth Mixture Modeling (LGMM) or Latent Class Growth Modeling (LCGA). The difference between the two models is whether variance within latent classes is allowed for (Jung & Wickrama, 2008). The default approach most often used when estimating such models begins with estimating a single cluster model, where only a single underlying group is presumed. Next, several additional models are estimated with an increasing number of clusters (latent groups or classes). For each of these models, the software is allowed to estimate all parameters without any restrictions. A final model is chosen based on model comparison tools, for example, using the BIC, the bootstrapped chi-square test, or the Lo-Mendell-Rubin test. METHOD: To ease the use of LGMM/LCGA step by step in this symposium (Van de Schoot, 2015) guidelines are presented which can be used for researchers applying the methods to longitudinal data, for example, the development of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) after trauma (Depaoli, van de Schoot, van Loey, & Sijbrandij, 2015; Galatzer-Levy, 2015). The guidelines include how to use the software Mplus (Muthen & Muthen, 1998-2012) to run the set of models needed to answer the research question: how many latent classes exist in the data? The next step described in the guidelines is how to add covariates/predictors to predict class membership using the three-step approach (Vermunt, 2010). Lastly, it described what essentials to report in the paper. CONCLUSIONS: When applying LGMM/LCGA models for the first time, the guidelines presented can be used to guide what models to run and what to report.
- 35R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2020. https://www.R-project.org/ (accessed 01-07-2019).Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 36Rosenberg, J.; Beymer, P.; Anderson, D.; Van Lissa, C. J.; Schmidt, J. tidyLPA: An R Package to Easily Carry Out Latent Profile Analysis (LPA) Using Open-Source or Commercial Software. J. Open Source Softw. 2018, 3, 978, DOI: 10.21105/joss.00978Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 37Muthén, L. K.; Muthén, B. O. Mplus User’s Guide: Vol., 7; Muthén & Muthén: Los Angeles, CA, 1998; 950 p.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 38Bakk, Z.; Vermunt, J. K. Robustness of stepwise latent class modeling with continuous distal outcomes. Struct. Equ. Modeling 2016, 23, 20– 31, DOI: 10.1080/10705511.2014.955104Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 39Asparouhov, T.; Muthén, B. Auxiliary Variables in Mixture Modeling: Three-Step Approaches Using Mplus. Struct. Equ. Modeling 2014, 21, 329– 341, DOI: 10.1080/10705511.2014.915181Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 40Cózar, A.; Echevarría, F.; González-Gordillo, J. I.; Irigoien, X.; Úbeda, B.; Hernández-León, S.; Palma, Á. T.; Navarro, S.; García-de-Lomas, J.; Ruiz, A.; Fernández-de-Puelles, M. L.; Duarte, C. M. Plastic debris in the open ocean. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2014, 111, 10239– 10244, DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1314705111Google Scholar40Plastic debris in the open oceanCozar, Andres; Echevarria, Fidel; Gonzalez-Gordillo, J. Ignacio; Irigoien, Xabier; Ubeda, Barbara; Hernandez-Leon, Santiago; Palma, Alvaro T.; Navarro, Sandra; Garcia-de-Lomas, Juan; Ruiz, Andrea; Fernandez-de-Puelles, Maria L.; Duarte, Carlos M.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (2014), 111 (28), 10239-10244CODEN: PNASA6; ISSN:0027-8424. (National Academy of Sciences)There is a rising concern regarding the accumulation of floating plastic debris in the open ocean. However, the magnitude and the fate of this pollution are still open questions. Using data from the Malaspina 2010 circumnavigation, regional surveys, and previously published reports, we show a worldwide distribution of plastic on the surface of the open ocean, mostly accumulating in the convergence zones of each of the five subtropical gyres with comparable d. However, the global load of plastic on the open ocean surface was estd. to be on the order of tens of thousands of tons, far less than expected. Our observations of the size distribution of floating plastic debris point at important size-selective sinks removing millimeter-sized fragments of floating plastic on a large scale. This sink may involve a combination of fast nano-fragmentation of the microplastic into particles of microns or smaller, their transference to the ocean interior by food webs and ballasting processes, and processes yet to be discovered. Resolving the fate of the missing plastic debris is of fundamental importance to det. the nature and significance of the impacts of plastic pollution in the ocean.
- 41Van Sebille, E.; Wilcox, C.; Lebreton, L.; Maximenko, N.; Hardesty, B. D.; van Franeker, J. A.; Eriksen, M.; Siegel, D.; Galgani, F.; Law, K. L. A global inventory of small floating plastic debris. Environ. Res. Lett. 2015, 10, 124006, DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/10/12/124006Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 42Kukulka, T.; Proskurowski, G.; Morét-Ferguson, S.; Meyer, D. W.; Law, K. L. The effect of wind mixing on the vertical distribution of buoyant plastic debris. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2012, 39, L07601, DOI: 10.1029/2012GL051116Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 43Eriksen, M.; Lebreton, L. C.; Carson, H. S.; Thiel, M.; Moore, C. J.; Borerro, J. C.; Galgani, F.; Ryan, P. G.; Reisser, J. Plastic Pollution in the World’s Oceans: More than 5 Trillion Plastic Pieces Weighing over 250,000 Tons Afloat at Sea. PLoS One 2014, 9, e111913, DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111913Google Scholar43Plastic pollution in the world's oceans: more than 5 trillion plastic pieces weighing over 250,000 tons afloat at seaEriksen, Marcus; Labreton, Laurent C. M.; Carson, Henry S.; Thiel, Martin; Moore, Charles J.; Borerro, Jose C.; Galgani, Francois; Ryan, Peter G.; Reisser, JuliaPLoS One (2014), 9 (12), e111913/1-e111913/15, 15 pp.CODEN: POLNCL; ISSN:1932-6203. (Public Library of Science)Plastic pollution is ubiquitous throughout the marine environment, yet ests. of the global abundance and wt. of floating plastics have lacked data, particularly from the Southern Hemisphere and remote regions. Here we report an est. of the total no. of plastic particles and their wt. floating in the world's oceans from 24 expeditions (2007-2013) across all five sub-tropical gyres, costal Australia, Bay of Bengal and the Mediterranean Sea conducting surface net tows (N = 680) and visual survey transects of large plastic debris (N = 891). Using an oceanog. model of floating debris dispersal calibrated by our data, and correcting for wind-driven vertical mixing, we est. a min. of 5.25 trillion particles weighing 268,940 tons. When comparing between four size classes, two microplastic <4.75 mm and meso- and macroplastic >4.75 mm, a tremendous loss of microplastics is obsd. from the sea surface compared to expected rates of fragmentation, suggesting there are mechanisms at play that remove <4.75 mm plastic particles from the ocean surface.
- 44Reisser, J.; Slat, B.; Noble, K.; du Plessis, K.; Epp, M.; Proietti, M.; de Sonneville, J.; Becker, T.; Pattiaratchi, C. The vertical distribution of buoyant plastics at sea: an observational study in the North Atlantic Gyre. Biogeosciences 2015, 12, 1249– 1256, DOI: 10.5194/bg-12-1249-2015Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 45Morét-Ferguson, S.; Law, K. L.; Proskurowski, G.; Murphy, E. K.; Peacock, E. E.; Reddy, C. M. The size, mass and composition of plastic debris in the western North Atlantic Ocean. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2010, 60, 1873– 1878, DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2010.07.020Google Scholar45The size, mass, and composition of plastic debris in the western North Atlantic OceanMoret-Ferguson, Skye; Law, Kara Lavender; Proskurowski, Giora; Murphy, Ellen K.; Peacock, Emily E.; Reddy, Christopher M.Marine Pollution Bulletin (2010), 60 (10), 1873-1878CODEN: MPNBAZ; ISSN:0025-326X. (Elsevier Ltd.)This study reports the first inventory of phys. properties of individual plastic debris in the North Atlantic. We analyzed 748 samples for size, mass, and material compn. collected from surface net tows on 11 expeditions from Cape Cod, Massachusetts to the Caribbean Sea between 1991 and 2007. Particles were mostly fragments less than 10 mm in size with nearly all lighter than 0.05 g. Material densities ranged from 0.808 to 1.24 g ml-1, with about half between 0.97 and 1.04 g ml-1, a range not typically found in virgin plastics. Elemental anal. suggests that samples in this d. range are consistent with polypropylene and polyethylene whose densities have increased, likely due to biofouling. Pelagic densities varied considerably from that of beach plastic debris, suggesting that plastic particles are modified during their residence at sea. These analyses provide clues in understanding particle fate and potential debris sources, and address ecol. implications of pelagic plastic debris.
- 46Galloway, T. S.; Cole, M.; Lewis, C. Interactions of microplastic debris throughout the marine ecosystem. Nature Ecol. Evol. 2017, 1, 0116, DOI: 10.1038/s41559-017-0116Google Scholar46Interactions of microplastic debris throughout the marine ecosystemGalloway Tamara S; Cole Matthew; Lewis CeriNature ecology & evolution (2017), 1 (5), 116 ISSN:.Marine microscopic plastic (microplastic) debris is a modern societal issue, illustrating the challenge of balancing the convenience of plastic in daily life with the prospect of causing ecological harm by careless disposal. Here we develop the concept of microplastic as a complex, dynamic mixture of polymers and additives, to which organic material and contaminants can successively bind to form an 'ecocorona', increasing the density and surface charge of particles and changing their bioavailability and toxicity. Chronic exposure to microplastic is rarely lethal, but can adversely affect individual animals, reducing feeding and depleting energy stores, with knock-on effects for fecundity and growth. We explore the extent to which ecological processes could be impacted, including altered behaviours, bioturbation and impacts on carbon flux to the deep ocean. We discuss how microplastic compares with other anthropogenic pollutants in terms of ecological risk, and consider the role of science and society in tackling this global issue in the future.
- 47McDermid, K. J.; McMullen, T. L. Quantitative analysis of small-plastic debris on beaches in the Hawaiian archipelago. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2004, 48, 790– 794, DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2003.10.017Google Scholar47Quantitative analysis of small-plastic debris on beaches in the Hawaiian archipelagoMcDermid, Karla J.; McMullen, Tracy L.Marine Pollution Bulletin (2004), 48 (7-8), 790-794CODEN: MPNBAZ; ISSN:0025-326X. (Elsevier Science B.V.)Small-plastic beach debris from 9 coastal locations throughout the Hawaiian Archipelago was analyzed. At each beach, replicate 20 L samples of sediment were collected, sieved for debris 1-15 mm in size, sorted by type, counted and weighed. Small-plastic debris occurred on all of the beaches, but the greatest quantity was found at three of the most remote beaches on Midway Atoll and Moloka'i. Of the debris analyzed, 72% by wt. was plastic. A total of 19,100 pieces of plastic were collected from the 9 beaches, 11% of which was pre-prodn. plastic pellets. This study documents for the 1st time the presence of small-plastic debris on Hawaiian beaches and corroborates ests. of the abundance of plastics in the marine environment in the North Pacific.
- 48Yokota, K.; Waterfield, H.; Hastings, C.; Davidson, E.; Kwietniewski, E.; Wells, B. Finding the missing piece of the aquatic plastic pollution puzzle: Interaction between primary producers and microplastics. Limnol. & Oceanogr. 2017, 2, 91– 104, DOI: 10.1002/lol2.10040Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 49Hidalgo-Ruz, V.; Gutow, L.; Thompson, R. C.; Thiel, M. Microplastics in the Marine Environment: A Review of the Methods Used for Identification and Quantification. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 3060– 3075, DOI: 10.1021/es2031505Google Scholar49Microplastics in marine environment review of methods for identification and quantificationHidalgo-Ruz, Valeria; Gutow, Lars; Thompson, Richard C.; Thiel, MartinEnvironmental Science & Technology (2012), 46 (6), 3060-3075CODEN: ESTHAG; ISSN:0013-936X. (American Chemical Society)This review of 68 studies compares the methodologies used for the identification and quantification of microplastics from the marine environment. Three main sampling strategies were identified: selective, vol.-reduced, and bulk sampling. Most sediment samples came from sandy beaches at the high tide line, and most seawater samples were taken at the sea surface using neuston nets. Four steps were distinguished during sample processing: d. sepn., filtration, sieving, and visual sorting of microplastics. Visual sorting was one of the most commonly used methods for the identification of microplastics (using type, shape, degrdn. stage, and color as criteria). Chem. and phys. characteristics (e.g., specific d.) were also used. The most reliable method to identify the chem. compn. of microplastics is by IR spectroscopy. Most studies reported that plastic fragments were polyethylene and polypropylene polymers. Units commonly used for abundance ests. are "items per m2" for sediment and sea surface studies and "items per m3" for water column studies. Mesh size of sieves and filters used during sampling or sample processing influence abundance ests. Most studies reported two main size ranges of microplastics: (i) 500 μm-5 mm, which are retained by a 500 μm sieve/net, and (ii) 1-500 μm, or fractions thereof that are retained on filters. We recommend that future programs of monitoring continue to distinguish these size fractions, but we suggest standardized sampling procedures which allow the spatiotemporal comparison of microplastic abundance across marine environments.
- 50Ivar do Sul, J.; Costa, M. F.; Fillmann, G. Microplastics in the pelagic environment around oceanic islands of the Western Tropical Atlantic Ocean. Water, Air, & Soil Poll. 2014, 225, 2004, DOI: 10.1007/s11270-014-2004-zGoogle ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 51Bodek, S.; Jerolmack, D. J. Breaking down chipping and fragmentation in sediment transport: the control of material strength. Earth Surf. Dynam. 2021, 9, 1531– 1543, DOI: 10.5194/esurf-9-1531-2021Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
Cited By
Smart citations by scite.ai include citation statements extracted from the full text of the citing article. The number of the statements may be higher than the number of citations provided by ACS Publications if one paper cites another multiple times or lower if scite has not yet processed some of the citing articles.
This article is cited by 16 publications.
- Stefan Dittmar, Aki S. Ruhl, Korinna Altmann, Martin Jekel. Settling Velocities of Small Microplastic Fragments and Fibers. Environmental Science & Technology 2024, 58
(14)
, 6359-6369. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c09602
- Margherita Barchiesi, Merel Kooi, Albert A. Koelmans. Adding Depth to Microplastics. Environmental Science & Technology 2023, 57
(37)
, 14015-14023. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c03620
- Christina Galafton, Nils Thonemann, Martina G. Vijver. It is time to develop characterization factors for terrestrial plastic pollution impacts on ecosystems in life cycle impact assessment – a systematic review identifying knowledge gaps. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 2025, 30
(5)
, 994-1010. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-025-02446-7
- Jin‐Min Li, Ming‐Fang Yu, Chih‐Ming Kao, Rao Y. Surampalli, Tian C. Zhang. Global Strategies/Policies and Citizen Science for Microplastic Management. 2025, 577-597. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781394251100.ch20
- Jiaqi Zhang, Clarence Edward Choi. Towards A universal settling model for microplastics with diverse shapes: Machine learning breaking morphological barriers. Water Research 2025, 272 , 122961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2024.122961
- Tianyu Zhuo, Beibei Chai, Xue-yi You. Modeling the spatiotemporal distribution, bioaccumulation, and ecological risk assessment of microplastics in aquatic ecosystems: A review. Aquatic Toxicology 2025, 279 , 107210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2024.107210
- Manildo de Oliveira, Nikolas Souza, Jader Lugon, Antônio Silva Neto, Ramiro Neves. Mathematical modelling and simulations for microplastic environmental research: a systematic review. Environmental Reviews 2025, 33 , 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1139/er-2024-0034
- Rene M. Boiteau, Erin L. McParland. Organic matter in the ocean. 2025, 415-457. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-99762-1.00054-1
- Laura Contreras, Carlos Edo, Roberto Rosal. Mass concentration of plastic particles from two-dimensional images. Science of The Total Environment 2024, 946 , 173849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.173849
- Wei Gao, Xue-Jiao Deng, Jun Zhang, Lin Qi, Xiu-Qing Zhao, Peng-Yu Zhang. Assessment of quality control measures in the monitoring of microplastic: a critical review. Environmental Pollutants and Bioavailability 2023, 35
(1)
https://doi.org/10.1080/26395940.2023.2203349
- Elena Corella-Puertas, Carla Hajjar, Jérôme Lavoie, Anne-Marie Boulay. MarILCA characterization factors for microplastic impacts in life cycle assessment: Physical effects on biota from emissions to aquatic environments. Journal of Cleaner Production 2023, 418 , 138197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138197
- Anne Grundlehner, Noël J. Diepens, Theo Linders, Edwin T.H.M. Peeters, Albert A. Koelmans. Towards continuous mass and size distributions for beach plastic litter: Spatiotemporal analyses of abundance and composition. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2023, 458 , 131984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.131984
- Yao Chen, Lele Bai, Dening Peng, Xinru Wang, Meijun Wu, Zhenfeng Bian. Advancements in catalysis for plastic resource utilization. Environmental Science: Advances 2023, 2
(9)
, 1151-1166. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3VA00158J
- Albert A. Koelmans, Berte M. Gebreyohanes Belay, Svenja M. Mintenig, Nur Hazimah Mohamed Nor, Paula E. Redondo-Hasselerharm, Vera N. de Ruijter. Towards a rational and efficient risk assessment for microplastics. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry 2023, 165 , 117142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2023.117142
- Albert A. Koelmans, Paula E. Redondo-Hasselerharm, Nur Hazimah Mohamed Nor, Todd Gouin. On the probability of ecological risks from microplastics in the Laurentian Great lakes. Environmental Pollution 2023, 325 , 121445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2023.121445
- Caspar J. van Lissa. tidySEM: Tidy Structural Equation Modeling. 2020https://doi.org/10.32614/CRAN.package.tidySEM
Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.
Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.
The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.
Recommended Articles
Abstract
Figure 1
Figure 1. Plastic concentration per sample (particles/L) along our sampling route. The green color marks samples used for present GMM analysis. Red color marks samples not considered suitable for the GMM analysis, due to inconsistent sample conditions.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Particle concentration per sample (histogram) and mass concentration (yellow data points). Largest concentrations are found in the center of the North Atlantic (20°N–50°N), lower concentrations are found the North Atlantic Current (51°N–56°N), and in the North Sea (58°N). The outlier in mass concentration was caused by a bottle cap.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Comparison of mixture models for the length of lines (value; mm), estimating 1 to 5 classes with varying means and variances. Headers indicate the number of classes used in the mixture model. A 2-class solution is chosen, which shows one class of smaller lines, and one class of significantly larger lines. Large lines show a relatively high abundance.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Mixture model of fragments with free means and variances, and fixed covariances. A 2-class solution shows a large class with a length that is relatively equal to width (strong correlation), and a smaller class with a length that is substantially different from width (weak correlation), indicating heterogeneity of shape for large fragments, and homogeneity of shape for small fragments. Length and width in mm.
Figure 5
Figure 5. Proportion of polymer types by latent class. There are significant differences across all classes for all three polymer types, implying that the classes differed significantly from one another with respect to polymer composition.
References
This article references 51 other publications.
- 1Science Advice for Policy by European Academies. A Scientific Perspective on Microplastics in Nature and Society; SAPEA: Berlin, 2019.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 2Microplastics in drinking-water; World Health Organization: Geneva, 2019. License: CC-BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 3Law, K. L. Plastics in the Marine Environment. Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci. 2017, 9, 205– 209, DOI: 10.1146/annurev-marine-010816-0604093Plastics in the Marine EnvironmentLaw Kara LavenderAnnual review of marine science (2017), 9 (), 205-229 ISSN:.Plastics contamination in the marine environment was first reported nearly 50 years ago, less than two decades after the rise of commercial plastics production, when less than 50 million metric tons were produced per year. In 2014, global plastics production surpassed 300 million metric tons per year. Plastic debris has been detected worldwide in all major marine habitats, in sizes from microns to meters. In response, concerns about risks to marine wildlife upon exposure to the varied forms of plastic debris have increased, stimulating new research into the extent and consequences of plastics contamination in the marine environment. Here, I present a framework to evaluate the current understanding of the sources, distribution, fate, and impacts of marine plastics. Despite remaining knowledge gaps in mass budgeting and challenges in investigating ecological impacts, the increasing evidence of the ubiquity of plastics contamination in the marine environment, the continued rapid growth in plastics production, and the evidence-albeit limited-of demonstrated impacts to marine wildlife support immediate implementation of source-reducing measures to decrease the potential risks of plastics in the marine ecosystem.
- 4Xanthos, D.; Walker, T. R. International policies to reduce plastic marine pollution from single-use plastics (plastic bags and microbeads): A review. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2017, 118 (1–2), 17– 26, DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.02.0484International policies to reduce plastic marine pollution from single-use plastics (plastic bags and microbeads): A reviewXanthos, Dirk; Walker, Tony R.Marine Pollution Bulletin (2017), 118 (1-2), 17-26CODEN: MPNBAZ; ISSN:0025-326X. (Elsevier Ltd.)Marine plastic pollution has been a growing concern for decades. Single-use plastics (plastic bags and microbeads) are a significant source of this pollution. Although research outlining environmental, social, and economic impacts of marine plastic pollution is growing, few studies have examd. policy and legislative tools to reduce plastic pollution, particularly single-use plastics (plastic bags and microbeads). This paper reviews current international market-based strategies and policies to reduce plastic bags and microbeads. While policies to reduce microbeads began in 2014, interventions for plastic bags began much earlier in 1991. However, few studies have documented or measured the effectiveness of these redn. strategies. Recommendations to further reduce single-use plastic marine pollution include: (i) research to evaluate effectiveness of bans and levies to ensure policies are having pos. impacts on marine environments; and (ii) education and outreach to reduce consumption of plastic bags and microbeads at source.
- 5Vince, J.; Hardesty, B. D. Plastic pollution challenges in marine and coastal environments. From local to global governance. Restor. Ecol. 2017, 25, 123– 12, DOI: 10.1111/rec.12388There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 6Syberg, K.; Nielsen, M. B.; Westergaard Clausen, L. P.; van Calster, G.; van Wezel, A.; Rochman, C.; Koelmans, A. A.; Cronin, R.; Pahl, S.; Hansen, S. F. Regulation of plastic from a circular economy perspective. Curr. Opin. Green Sustain. Chem. 2021, 29, 100462, DOI: 10.1016/j.cogsc.2021.100462There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 7Hartmann, N. B.; Hüffer, T.; Thompson, R. C.; Hassellöv, M.; Verschoor, A.; Daugaard, A. E.; Rist, S.; Karlsson, T.; Brennholt, N.; Cole, M.; Herrling, M. P.; Hess, M. C.; Ivleva, N. P.; Lusher, A. L.; Wagner, M. Are We Speaking the Same Language? Recommendations for a Definition and Categorization Framework for Plastic Debris. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 53, 1039– 1047, DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.8b052977Are We Speaking the Same Language? Recommendations for a Definition and Categorization Framework for Plastic DebrisHartmann, Nanna B.; Huffer, Thorsten; Thompson, Richard C.; Hassellov, Martin; Verschoor, Anja; Daugaard, Anders E.; Rist, Sinja; Karlsson, Therese; Brennholt, Nicole; Cole, Matthew; Herrling, Maria P.; Hess, Maren C.; Ivleva, Natalia P.; Lusher, Amy L.; Wagner, MartinEnvironmental Science & Technology (2019), 53 (3), 1039-1047CODEN: ESTHAG; ISSN:0013-936X. (American Chemical Society)A review is given. The accumulation of plastic litter in natural environments is a global issue. Concerns over potential neg. impacts on the economy, wildlife, and human health provide strong incentives for improving the sustainable use of plastics. Despite the many voices raised on the issue, we lack a consensus on how to define and categorize plastic debris. This is evident for microplastics, where inconsistent size classes are used and where the materials to be included are under debate. While this is inherent in an emerging research field, an ambiguous terminol. results in confusion and miscommunication that may compromise progress in research and mitigation measures. Therefore, we need to be explicit on what exactly we consider plastic debris. Thus, we critically discuss the advantages and disadvantages of a unified terminol., propose a definition and categorization framework, and highlight areas of uncertainty. Going beyond size classes, our framework includes physicochem. properties (polymer compn., solid state, soly.) as defining criteria and size, shape, color, and origin as classifiers for categorization. Acknowledging the rapid evolution of our knowledge on plastic pollution, our framework will promote consensus building within the scientific and regulatory community based on a solid scientific foundation.
- 8Rochman, C. M.; Brookson, C.; Bikker, J.; Djuric, N.; Earn, A.; Bucci, K.; Athey, S.; Huntington, A.; McIlwraith, H.; Munno, K.; De Frond, H.; Kolomijeca, A.; Erdle, L.; Grbic, J.; Bayoumi, M.; Borrelle, S. B.; Wu, T.; Santoro, S.; Werbowski, L. M.; Zhu, X.; Giles, R. K.; Hamilton, B. M.; Thaysen, C.; Kaura, A.; Klasios, N.; Ead, L.; Kim, J.; Sherlock, C.; Ho, A.; Hung, C. Rethinking microplastics as a diverse contaminant suite. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2019, 38, 703– 711, DOI: 10.1002/etc.43718Rethinking microplastics as a diverse contaminant suiteRochman, Chelsea M.; Brookson, Cole; Bikker, Jacqueline; Djuric, Natasha; Earn, Arielle; Bucci, Kennedy; Athey, Samantha; Huntington, Aimee; McIlwraith, Hayley; Munno, Keenan; De Frond, Hannah; Kolomijeca, Anna; Erdle, Lisa; Grbic, Jelena; Bayoumi, Malak; Borrelle, Stephanie B.; Wu, Tina; Santoro, Samantha; Werbowski, Larissa M.; Zhu, Xia; Giles, Rachel K.; Hamilton, Bonnie M.; Thaysen, Clara; Kaura, Ashima; Klasios, Natasha; Ead, Lauren; Kim, Joel; Sherlock, Cassandra; Ho, Annissa; Hung, CharlotteEnvironmental Toxicology and Chemistry (2019), 38 (4), 703-711CODEN: ETOCDK; ISSN:0730-7268. (Wiley-Blackwell)There is no expanded citation for this reference.
- 9Koelmans, A. A.; Redondo-Hasselerharm, P. E; Mohamed Nor, N. H.; Kooi, M. Solving the non-alignment of methods and approaches used in microplastic research in order to consistently characterize risk. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020, 54 (19), 12307– 12315, DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.0c029829Solving the nonalignment of methods and approaches used in microplastic research to consistently characterize riskKoelmans, Albert A.; Redondo-Hasselerharm, Paula E.; Mohamed Nor, Nur Hazimah; Kooi, MerelEnvironmental Science & Technology (2020), 54 (19), 12307-12315CODEN: ESTHAG; ISSN:0013-936X. (American Chemical Society)The lack of std. approaches in microplastic research limits progress in the abatement of plastic pollution. Here, we propose and test rescaling methods that are able to improve the alignment of methods used in microplastic research. We describe a method to correct for the differences in size ranges as used by studies reporting microplastic concns. and demonstrate how this reduces the variation in aq.-phase concns. caused by method differences. We provide a method to interchange between no., vol., and mass concns. using probability d. functions that represent environmental microplastic. Finally, we use this method to correct for the incompatibility of data as used in current species sensitivity distributions (SSDs), caused by differences in the microplastic types used in effect studies and those in nature. We derived threshold effect concns. from such a cor. SSD for freshwater species. Comparison of the rescaled exposure concns. and threshold effect concns. reveals that the latter would be exceeded for 1.5% of the known surface water exposure concns. worldwide. Altogether, this toolset allows us to correct for the diversity of microplastic, to address it in a common language, and to assess its risks as one environmental material.
- 10Kooi, M.; Koelmans, A. A. Simplifying microplastic via continuous probability distributions for size, shape and density. Environ. Sci. Technol. Letters 2019, 6, 551– 557, DOI: 10.1021/acs.estlett.9b0037910Simplifying Microplastic via Continuous Probability Distributions for Size, Shape, and DensityKooi, Merel; Koelmans, Albert A.Environmental Science & Technology Letters (2019), 6 (9), 551-557CODEN: ESTLCU; ISSN:2328-8930. (American Chemical Society)Because of their diverse sizes, shapes, and densities, environmental microplastics are often perceived as complex. Many studies struggle with this complexity and either address only a part of this diversity or present data using discrete classifications for sizes, shapes, and densities. We argue that such classifications will never be fully satisfactory, as any definition using classes does not capture the essentially continuous nature of environmental microplastic. Therefore, we propose to simplify microplastics by fully defining them through a three-dimensional (3D) probability distribution, with size, shape, and d. as dimensions. In addn. to introducing the concept, we parametrize these probability distributions, using empirical data. This parametrization results in an approx. yet realistic representation of "true" environmental microplastic. This approach to simplifying microplastic could be applicable to exposure measurements, effect studies, and fate modeling. Furthermore, it allows for easy comparison between studies, irresp. of sampling or lab. setup. We demonstrate how the 3D probability distribution of environmental vs. ingested microplastic can be helpful in understanding the bioavailability of and exposure to microplastic. We argue that the concept of simplified microplastic will also be helpful in probabilistic risk modeling, which would greatly enhance our understanding of the risk that microplastics pose to the environment.
- 11Koelmans, A. A.; Besseling, E.; Foekema, E.; Kooi, M.; Mintenig, S.; Ossendorp, B. C.; Redondo-Hasselerharm, P. E.; Verschoor, A.; van Wezel, A. P.; Scheffer, M. Risks of Plastic Debris: Unravelling fact, opinion, perception and belief. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 51, 11513– 11519, DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.7b0221911Risks of Plastic Debris: Unravelling Fact, Opinion, Perception, and BeliefKoelmans, Albert A.; Besseling, Ellen; Foekema, Edwin; Kooi, Merel; Mintenig, Svenja; Ossendorp, Bernadette C.; Redondo-Hasselerharm, Paula E.; Verschoor, Anja; van Wezel, Annemarie P.; Scheffer, MartenEnvironmental Science & Technology (2017), 51 (20), 11513-11519CODEN: ESTHAG; ISSN:0013-936X. (American Chemical Society)Researcher and media alarms caused plastic debris to be perceived as a major threat to humans and animals; however, although wasting plastics in the environment is clearly undesirable for aesthetic and economic reasons, actual environmental risks of different plastics and their assocd. chems. is largely unknown. This work showed how a systematic assessment of adverse outcome pathways based on ecol. relevant metrics for exposure and effect can bring risk assessment within reach. Results will help respond to the current public concern in a balanced way and allow policy-makers to take measures using scientifically sound reasons.
- 12Koelmans, A. A.; Redondo-Hasselerharm, P. E.; Mohamed Nor, N. H.; de Ruijter, V. N.; Mintenig, S. M.; Kooi, M. Risk Assessment of Microplastic Particles. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2022, 7, 138– 152, DOI: 10.1038/s41578-021-00411-yThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 13Cowger, W.; Booth, A. M.; Hamilton, B. M.; Thaysen, C.; Primpke, S.; Munno, K.; Lusher, A. L.; Dehaut, A.; Vaz, V. P.; Liboiron, M.; Devriese, L. I.; Hermabessiere, L.; Rochman, C.; Athey, S. N.; Lynch, J. M.; De Frond, H.; Gray, A.; Jones, O. A. H.; Brander, S.; Steele, C.; Moore, S.; Sanchez, A.; Nel, H. Reporting Guidelines to Increase the Reproducibility and Comparability of Research on Microplastics. Appl. Spectrosc. 2020, 74, 1066– 1077, DOI: 10.1177/000370282093029213Reporting Guidelines to Increase the Reproducibility and Comparability of Research on MicroplasticsCowger, Win; Booth, Andy M.; Hamilton, Bonnie M.; Thaysen, Clara; Primpke, Sebastian; Munno, Keenan; Lusher, Amy L.; Dehaut, Alexandre; Vaz, Vitor P.; Liboiron, Max; Devriese, Lisa I.; Hermabessiere, Ludovic; Rochman, Chelsea; Athey, Samantha N.; Lynch, Jennifer M.; De Frond, Hannah; Gray, Andrew; Jones, Oliver A. H.; Brander, Susanne; Steele, Clare; Moore, Shelly; Sanchez, Alterra; Nel, HollyApplied Spectroscopy (2020), 74 (9), 1066-1077CODEN: APSPA4; ISSN:0003-7028. (Sage Publications)A review. The ubiquitous pollution of the environment with microplastics, a diverse suite of contaminants, is of growing concern for science and currently receives considerable public, political, and academic attention. The potential impact of microplastics in the environment has prompted a great deal of research in recent years. Many diverse methods have been developed to answer different questions about microplastic pollution, from sources, transport, and fate in the environment, and about effects on humans and wildlife. These methods are often insufficiently described, making studies neither comparable nor reproducible. The proliferation of new microplastic investigations and cross-study syntheses to answer larger scale questions are hampered. This diverse group of 23 researchers think these issues can begin to be overcome through the adoption of a set of reporting guidelines. This collaboration was created using an open science framework that we detail for future use. Here, we suggest harmonized reporting guidelines for microplastic studies in environmental and lab. settings through all steps of a typical study, including best practices for reporting materials, quality assurance/quality control, data, field sampling, sample prepn., microplastic identification, microplastic categorization, microplastic quantification, and considerations for toxicol. studies. We developed three easy to use documents, a detailed document, a checklist, and a mind map, that can be used to ref. the reporting guidelines quickly. We intend that these reporting guidelines support the annotation, dissemination, interpretation, reviewing, and synthesis of microplastic research. Through open access licensing (CC BY 4.0), these documents aim to increase the validity, reproducibility, and comparability of studies in this field for the benefit of the global community.
- 14Mohamed Nor, N. H.; Kooi, M.; Diepens, N. J.; Koelmans, A. A. Lifetime accumulation of nano- and microplastic in children and adults. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2021, 55, 5084– 5096, DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.0c0738414Lifetime Accumulation of Microplastic in Children and AdultsMohamed Nor, Nur Hazimah; Kooi, Merel; Diepens, Noel J.; Koelmans, Albert A.Environmental Science & Technology (2021), 55 (8), 5084-5096CODEN: ESTHAG; ISSN:0013-936X. (American Chemical Society)Human exposure to microplastic is recognized as a global problem, but the uncertainty, variability, and lifetime accumulation are unresolved. We provide a probabilistic lifetime exposure model for children and adults, which accounts for intake via eight food types and inhalation, intestinal absorption, biliary excretion, and plastic-assocd. chem. exposure via a physiol. based pharmacokinetic submodel. The model probabilistically simulates microplastic concns. in the gut, body tissue, and stool, the latter allowing validation against empirical data. Rescaling methods were used to ensure comparability between microplastic abundance data. Microplastic (1-5000μm) median intake rates are 553 particles/capita/day (184 ng/capita/day) and 883 particles/capita/day (583 ng/capita/day) for children and adults, resp. This intake can irreversibly accumulate to 8.32 × 103 (90% CI, 7.08 × 102-1.91 × 106) particles/capita or 6.4 (90% CI, 0.1-2.31 × 103) ng/capita for children until age 18, and up to 5.01 × 104 (90% CI, 5.25 × 103-9.33 × 106) particles/capita or 40.7 (90% CI, 0.8-9.85 × 103) ng/capita for adults until age 70 in the body tissue for 1-10μm particles. Simulated microplastic concns. in stool agree with empirical data. Chem. absorption from food and ingested microplastic of the nine intake media based on biphasic, reversible, and size-specific sorption kinetics, reveals that the contribution of microplastics to total chem. intake is small. The as-yet-unknown contributions of other food types are discussed in light of future research needs.
- 15Kooi, M.; Primpke, S.; Mintenig, S. M.; Lorenz, C.; Gerdts, G.; Koelmans, A. A. Characterizing microplastics across environmental compartments. Water Res. 2021, 202, 117429, DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2021.11742915Characterizing the multidimensionality of microplastics across environmental compartmentsKooi, Merel; Primpke, Sebastian; Mintenig, Svenja M.; Lorenz, Claudia; Gerdts, Gunnar; Koelmans, Albert A.Water Research (2021), 202 (), 117429CODEN: WATRAG; ISSN:0043-1354. (Elsevier Ltd.)Understanding the multidimensionality of microplastics is essential for a realistic assessment of the risks these particles pose to the environment and human health. Here, we capture size, shape, area, polymer, vol. and mass characteristics of >60,000 individual microplastic particles as continuous distributions. Particles originate from samples taken from different aquatic compartments, including surface water and sediments from the marine and freshwater environment, waste water effluents, and freshwater organisms. Data were obtained using state-of-the-art FTIR-imaging, using the same automated imaging post-processing software. We introduce a workflow with two quality criteria that assure minimumdata quality loss due to volumetric and filter area subsampling. We find that probability d. functions (PDFs) for particle length follow power law distributions, with median slopes ranging from 2.2 for marine surface water to 3.1 for biota samples, and that these slopes were compartment-specific. Polymer-specific PDFs for particle length demonstrated significant differences in slopes among polymers, hinting at polymer specific sources, removal or fragmentation processes. Furthermore, we provide PDFs for particle width, width to length ratio, area, sp. surface area, vol. and mass distributions and propose how these can represent the full diversity of toxicol. relevant dose metrics required for the assessment of microplastic risks.
- 16Mehinto, A. C.; Coffin, S.; Koelmans, A. A.; Brander, S. M.; Wagner, M.; Thornton Hampton, L. M.; Burton, G. A.; Miller, E.; Gouin, T.; Weisberg, S. B.; Rochman, C. M. Risk-Based Management Framework for Microplastics in Aquatic Ecosystems. Microplast. Nanoplast. 2022, 17, DOI: 10.1186/s43591-022-00033-3There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 17Coffin, S.; Weisberg, S. B.; Rochman, C. M.; Kooi, M.; Koelmans, A. A. Risk Characterization of Microplastics in San Francisco Bay, California. Micropl.&Nanopl. 2022, 2, 19, DOI: 10.1186/s43591-022-00037-zThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 18Redondo-Hasselerharm, P. E.; Rico, A.; Koelmans, A. A. Risk assessment of microplastics in freshwater benthic ecosystems guided by strict quality criteria and data alignment methods. J. Hazard. Mater. 2023, 441, 129814, DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.12981418Risk assessment of microplastics in freshwater sediments guided by strict quality criteria and data alignment methodsRedondo-Hasselerharm, Paula E.; Rico, Andreu; Koelmans, Albert A.Journal of Hazardous Materials (2023), 441 (), 129814CODEN: JHMAD9; ISSN:0304-3894. (Elsevier B.V.)Detg. the risks of microplastics is difficult because data is of variable quality and cannot be compared. Although sediments are important sinks for microplastics, no holistic risk assessment framework is available for this compartment. Here we assess the risks of microplastics in freshwater sediments worldwide, using strict quality criteria and alignment methods. Published exposure data were screened for quality using new criteria for microplastics in sediment and were rescaled to the std. 1-5000 μm microplastic size range. Threshold effect data were also screened for quality and were aligned to account for the polydispersity of environmental microplastics and for their bioaccessible fraction. Risks were characterized for effects triggered by food diln. or translocation, using ingested particle vol. and surface area as ecol. relevant metrics, resp. Based on species sensitivity distributions, we detd. Hazardous Concns. for 5% of the species (HC5, with 95% CI) of 4.9 x 109 (6.6 x 107 - 1.9 x 1011) and 1.1 x 1010 (3.2 x 108 - 4.0 x 1011) particles / kg sediment dry wt., for food diln. and translocation, resp. For all locations considered, exposure concns. were either below or in the margin of uncertainty of the HC5 values. We conclude that risks from microplastics to benthic communities cannot be excluded at current concns. in sediments worldwide.
- 19Scotto Rosato, N.; Baer, J. C. Latent Class Analysis: A Method for Capturing Heterogeneity. Social Work Research 2012, 36, 61– 69, DOI: 10.1093/swr/svs006There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 20Doveton, J. H.; Chang, T. Latent Facies Mapping from Binary Geological Data. J. Geol. 1991, 99, 299, DOI: 10.1086/629490There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 21Hendryx, M.; Luo, J. Latent class analysis of the association between polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon exposures and body mass index. Environ. Internat. 2018, 121, 227– 231, DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2018.09.016There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 22de Ruijter, V. N.; Redondo-Hasselerharm, P. E.; Gouin, T.; Koelmans, A. A. 2020. Quality criteria for microplastic effect studies in the context of risk assessment: A critical review. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020, 54 (19), 11692– 11705, DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.0c0305722Quality criteria for microplastic effect studies in the context of risk assessment: A critical reviewde Ruijter, Vera N.; Redondo-Hasselerharm, Paula E.; Gouin, Todd; Koelmans, Albert A.Environmental Science & Technology (2020), 54 (19), 11692-11705CODEN: ESTHAG; ISSN:0013-936X. (American Chemical Society)A review. In the literature, there is widespread consensus that methods in plastic research need improvement. Current limitations in quality assurance and harmonization prevent progress in our understanding of the true effects of microplastic in the environment. Following the recent development of quality assessment methods for studies reporting concns. in biota and water samples, we propose a method to assess the quality of microplastic effect studies. We reviewed 105 microplastic effect studies with aquatic biota, provided a systematic overview of their characteristics, developed 20 quality criteria in four main criteria categories (particle characterization, exptl. design, applicability in risk assessment, and ecol. relevance), propose a protocol for future effect studies with particles, and, finally, used all the information to define the wt. of evidence with respect to demonstrated effect mechanisms. On av., studies scored 44.6% (range 20-77.5%) of the max. score. No study scored pos. on all criteria, reconfirming the urgent need for better quality assurance. Most urgent recommendations for improvement relate to avoiding and verifying background contamination, and to improving the environmental relevance of exposure conditions. The majority of the studies (86.7%) evaluated on particle characteristics properly, nonetheless it should be underlined that by failing to provide characteristics of the particles, an entire expt. can become irreproducible. Studies addressed environmentally realistic polymer types fairly well; however, there was a mismatch between sizes tested and those targeted when analyzing microplastic in environmental samples. In far too many instances, studies suggest and speculate mechanisms that are poorly supported by the design and reporting of data in the study. This represents a problem for decision-makers and needs to be minimized in future research. In their papers, authors frame 10 effects mechanisms as "suggested", whereas 7 of them are framed as "demonstrated". When accounting for the quality of the studies according to our assessment, three of these mechanisms remained. These are inhibition of food assimilation and/or decreased nutritional value of food, internal phys. damage, and external phys. damage. We recommend that risk assessment addresses these mechanisms with higher priority.
- 23Lenz, R.; Enders, K.; Stedmon, C. A.; Mackenzie, D. M. A.; Nielsen, T. G. A critical assessment of visual identification of marine microplastic using Raman spectroscopy for analysis improvement. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2015, 100, 82– 91, DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.09.02623A critical assessment of visual identification of marine microplastic using Raman spectroscopy for analysis improvementLenz, Robin; Enders, Kristina; Stedmon, Colin A.; MacKenzie, David M. A.; Nielsen, Torkel GisselMarine Pollution Bulletin (2015), 100 (1), 82-91CODEN: MPNBAZ; ISSN:0025-326X. (Elsevier Ltd.)Identification and characterization of microplastic (MP) is a necessary step to evaluate their concns., chem. compn. and interactions with biota. MP ≥ 10 μm diam. filtered from below the sea surface in the European and subtropical North Atlantic were simultaneously identified by visual microscopy and Raman micro-spectroscopy. Visually identified particles below 100 μm had a significantly lower percentage confirmed by Raman than larger ones indicating that visual identification alone is inappropriate for studies on small microplastics. Sixty-eight percent of visually counted MP (n = 1279) were spectroscopically confirmed being plastic. The percentage varied with type, color and size of the MP. Fibers had a higher success rate (75%) than particles (64%). We tested Raman micro-spectroscopy applicability for MP identification with respect to varying chem. compn. (additives), degrdn. state and org. matter coating. Partially UV-degraded post-consumer plastics provided identifiable Raman spectra for polymers most common among marine MP, i.e. polyethylene and polypropylene.
- 24Rocha-Santos, T.; Duarte, A. C. A critical overview of the analytical approaches to the occurrence, the fate and the behaviour of microplastics in the environment. TrAC Trends Analyt. Chem. 2015, 65, 47– 53, DOI: 10.1016/j.trac.2014.10.01124A critical overview of the analytical approaches to the occurrence, the fate and the behavior of microplastics in the environmentRocha-Santos, Teresa; Duarte, Armando C.TrAC, Trends in Analytical Chemistry (2015), 65 (), 47-53CODEN: TTAEDJ; ISSN:0165-9936. (Elsevier B. V.)A review. Plastics can be found in food packaging, shopping bags, and household items, such as toothbrushes and pens, and facial cleansers. Due to the high disposability and low recovery of discharged materials, plastics materials have become debris accumulating in the environment. Microplastics have a dimension <5 mm and possess physico-chem. properties (e.g., size, d., color and chem. compn.) that are key contributors to their bioavailability to organisms. This review addresses the anal. approaches to characterization and quantification of microplastics in the environment and discusses recent studies on their occurrence, fate, and behavior. This crit. overview includes a general assessment of sampling and sample handling, and compares methods for morphol. and phys. classification, and methodologies for chem. characterization and quantification of the microplastics. Finally, this review addresses the advantages and the disadvantages of these techniques, and comments on future applications and potential research interest within this field.
- 25Pasquier, G.; Doyen, P.; Kazour, M.; Dehaut, A.; Diop, M.; Duflos, G.; Amara, R. Manta Net: The Golden Method for Sampling Surface Water Microplastics in Aquatic Environments. Front. Environ. Sci. 2022, 10, 811112, DOI: 10.3389/fenvs.2022.811112There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 26Masoumi, H.; Safavi, S. M.; Khani, Z. Identification and Classification of Plastic Resins using Near Infrared Reflectance Spectroscopy. Int. J. Mech. Ind. Eng. 2012, 6, 877– 884There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 27Zhu, S.; Chen, H.; Wang, M.; Guo, X.; Lei, Y.; Jin, G. Plastic solid waste identification system based on near infrared spectroscopy in combination with support vector machine. Adv. Ind. Eng. Polym. Res. 2019, 2, 77– 81, DOI: 10.1016/j.aiepr.2019.04.001There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 28Xia, J.; Huang, Y.; Li, Q.; Xiong, Y.; Min, S. Convolutional neural network with near-infrared spectroscopy for plastic discrimination. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2021, 19, 3547– 3555, DOI: 10.1007/s10311-021-01240-928Convolutional neural network with near-infrared spectroscopy for plastic discriminationXia, Jingjing; Huang, Yue; Li, Qianqian; Xiong, Yanmei; Min, ShungengEnvironmental Chemistry Letters (2021), 19 (5), 3547-3555CODEN: ECLNBJ; ISSN:1610-3653. (Springer)Plastic pollution is a global issue of increasing health concern, thus requiring innovative waste management. In particular, there is a need for advanced methods to identify and classify the different types of plastics. Near-IR spectroscopy is currently operational in some waste-sorting facilities, yet remains challenging to discriminate different black plastics because black targets have low reflectance in some spectral regions. Here we used partial least squares discrimination anal., soft independent modeling of class analogy, linear discriminant anal. and convolutional neural network to classify the plastics. We analyzed 159 plastic samples, including 84 black plastics, made of high impact polystyrene, acrylonitrile butadiene styrene, high-d. polyethylene, polyethylene terephthalate, polyamide 66, polycarbonate and polypropylene. Results show that the convolutional neural network model yielded an accuracy up to 98%, whereas other models displayed accuracy of 57-70%. Overall, convolutional neural network anal. of IR plastic data is promising to solve the bottleneck problem of black plastic discrimination.
- 29Schneider, C. A.; Rasband, W. S.; Eliceiri, K. W. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat. Methods 2012, 9, 671– 675, PMID 22930834 DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.208929NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysisSchneider, Caroline A.; Rasband, Wayne S.; Eliceiri, Kevin W.Nature Methods (2012), 9 (7_part1), 671-675CODEN: NMAEA3; ISSN:1548-7091. (Nature Publishing Group)For the past 25 years NIH Image and ImageJ software have been pioneers as open tools for the anal. of scientific images. We discuss the origins, challenges and solns. of these two programs, and how their history can serve to advise and inform other software projects.
- 30ImageJ Macro Reference Guide. https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/docs/macro_reference_guide.pdf (accessed 01–08–2019).There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 31Tabachnick, B. G.; Fidell, L. S.; Ullman, J. B. Using multivariate statistics, 7th ed.; Pearson: New York NY, 2019; 815 pages.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 32Geun Kim, M. Multivariate outliers and decompositions of Mahalanobis distance. Commun. Stat. Theory Methods. 2000, 29, 1511– 1526, DOI: 10.1080/03610920008832559There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 33Nylund, K. L.; Asparouhov, T.; Muthén, B. O. Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Struct. Equ. Modeling 2007, 14, 535– 569, DOI: 10.1080/10705510701575396There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 34Van de Schoot, R. Latent trajectory studies: The basics, how to interpret the results, and what to report. Eur. J. Psychotraumatol. 2015, 6, 27514, DOI: 10.3402/ejpt.v6.2751434Latent trajectory studies: the basics, how to interpret the results, and what to reportvan de Schoot Rens; van de Schoot RensEuropean journal of psychotraumatology (2015), 6 (), 27514 ISSN:2000-8066.BACKGROUND: In statistics, tools have been developed to estimate individual change over time. Also, the existence of latent trajectories, where individuals are captured by trajectories that are unobserved (latent), can be evaluated (Muthen & Muthen, 2000). The method used to evaluate such trajectories is called Latent Growth Mixture Modeling (LGMM) or Latent Class Growth Modeling (LCGA). The difference between the two models is whether variance within latent classes is allowed for (Jung & Wickrama, 2008). The default approach most often used when estimating such models begins with estimating a single cluster model, where only a single underlying group is presumed. Next, several additional models are estimated with an increasing number of clusters (latent groups or classes). For each of these models, the software is allowed to estimate all parameters without any restrictions. A final model is chosen based on model comparison tools, for example, using the BIC, the bootstrapped chi-square test, or the Lo-Mendell-Rubin test. METHOD: To ease the use of LGMM/LCGA step by step in this symposium (Van de Schoot, 2015) guidelines are presented which can be used for researchers applying the methods to longitudinal data, for example, the development of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) after trauma (Depaoli, van de Schoot, van Loey, & Sijbrandij, 2015; Galatzer-Levy, 2015). The guidelines include how to use the software Mplus (Muthen & Muthen, 1998-2012) to run the set of models needed to answer the research question: how many latent classes exist in the data? The next step described in the guidelines is how to add covariates/predictors to predict class membership using the three-step approach (Vermunt, 2010). Lastly, it described what essentials to report in the paper. CONCLUSIONS: When applying LGMM/LCGA models for the first time, the guidelines presented can be used to guide what models to run and what to report.
- 35R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2020. https://www.R-project.org/ (accessed 01-07-2019).There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 36Rosenberg, J.; Beymer, P.; Anderson, D.; Van Lissa, C. J.; Schmidt, J. tidyLPA: An R Package to Easily Carry Out Latent Profile Analysis (LPA) Using Open-Source or Commercial Software. J. Open Source Softw. 2018, 3, 978, DOI: 10.21105/joss.00978There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 37Muthén, L. K.; Muthén, B. O. Mplus User’s Guide: Vol., 7; Muthén & Muthén: Los Angeles, CA, 1998; 950 p.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 38Bakk, Z.; Vermunt, J. K. Robustness of stepwise latent class modeling with continuous distal outcomes. Struct. Equ. Modeling 2016, 23, 20– 31, DOI: 10.1080/10705511.2014.955104There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 39Asparouhov, T.; Muthén, B. Auxiliary Variables in Mixture Modeling: Three-Step Approaches Using Mplus. Struct. Equ. Modeling 2014, 21, 329– 341, DOI: 10.1080/10705511.2014.915181There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 40Cózar, A.; Echevarría, F.; González-Gordillo, J. I.; Irigoien, X.; Úbeda, B.; Hernández-León, S.; Palma, Á. T.; Navarro, S.; García-de-Lomas, J.; Ruiz, A.; Fernández-de-Puelles, M. L.; Duarte, C. M. Plastic debris in the open ocean. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2014, 111, 10239– 10244, DOI: 10.1073/pnas.131470511140Plastic debris in the open oceanCozar, Andres; Echevarria, Fidel; Gonzalez-Gordillo, J. Ignacio; Irigoien, Xabier; Ubeda, Barbara; Hernandez-Leon, Santiago; Palma, Alvaro T.; Navarro, Sandra; Garcia-de-Lomas, Juan; Ruiz, Andrea; Fernandez-de-Puelles, Maria L.; Duarte, Carlos M.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (2014), 111 (28), 10239-10244CODEN: PNASA6; ISSN:0027-8424. (National Academy of Sciences)There is a rising concern regarding the accumulation of floating plastic debris in the open ocean. However, the magnitude and the fate of this pollution are still open questions. Using data from the Malaspina 2010 circumnavigation, regional surveys, and previously published reports, we show a worldwide distribution of plastic on the surface of the open ocean, mostly accumulating in the convergence zones of each of the five subtropical gyres with comparable d. However, the global load of plastic on the open ocean surface was estd. to be on the order of tens of thousands of tons, far less than expected. Our observations of the size distribution of floating plastic debris point at important size-selective sinks removing millimeter-sized fragments of floating plastic on a large scale. This sink may involve a combination of fast nano-fragmentation of the microplastic into particles of microns or smaller, their transference to the ocean interior by food webs and ballasting processes, and processes yet to be discovered. Resolving the fate of the missing plastic debris is of fundamental importance to det. the nature and significance of the impacts of plastic pollution in the ocean.
- 41Van Sebille, E.; Wilcox, C.; Lebreton, L.; Maximenko, N.; Hardesty, B. D.; van Franeker, J. A.; Eriksen, M.; Siegel, D.; Galgani, F.; Law, K. L. A global inventory of small floating plastic debris. Environ. Res. Lett. 2015, 10, 124006, DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/10/12/124006There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 42Kukulka, T.; Proskurowski, G.; Morét-Ferguson, S.; Meyer, D. W.; Law, K. L. The effect of wind mixing on the vertical distribution of buoyant plastic debris. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2012, 39, L07601, DOI: 10.1029/2012GL051116There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 43Eriksen, M.; Lebreton, L. C.; Carson, H. S.; Thiel, M.; Moore, C. J.; Borerro, J. C.; Galgani, F.; Ryan, P. G.; Reisser, J. Plastic Pollution in the World’s Oceans: More than 5 Trillion Plastic Pieces Weighing over 250,000 Tons Afloat at Sea. PLoS One 2014, 9, e111913, DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.011191343Plastic pollution in the world's oceans: more than 5 trillion plastic pieces weighing over 250,000 tons afloat at seaEriksen, Marcus; Labreton, Laurent C. M.; Carson, Henry S.; Thiel, Martin; Moore, Charles J.; Borerro, Jose C.; Galgani, Francois; Ryan, Peter G.; Reisser, JuliaPLoS One (2014), 9 (12), e111913/1-e111913/15, 15 pp.CODEN: POLNCL; ISSN:1932-6203. (Public Library of Science)Plastic pollution is ubiquitous throughout the marine environment, yet ests. of the global abundance and wt. of floating plastics have lacked data, particularly from the Southern Hemisphere and remote regions. Here we report an est. of the total no. of plastic particles and their wt. floating in the world's oceans from 24 expeditions (2007-2013) across all five sub-tropical gyres, costal Australia, Bay of Bengal and the Mediterranean Sea conducting surface net tows (N = 680) and visual survey transects of large plastic debris (N = 891). Using an oceanog. model of floating debris dispersal calibrated by our data, and correcting for wind-driven vertical mixing, we est. a min. of 5.25 trillion particles weighing 268,940 tons. When comparing between four size classes, two microplastic <4.75 mm and meso- and macroplastic >4.75 mm, a tremendous loss of microplastics is obsd. from the sea surface compared to expected rates of fragmentation, suggesting there are mechanisms at play that remove <4.75 mm plastic particles from the ocean surface.
- 44Reisser, J.; Slat, B.; Noble, K.; du Plessis, K.; Epp, M.; Proietti, M.; de Sonneville, J.; Becker, T.; Pattiaratchi, C. The vertical distribution of buoyant plastics at sea: an observational study in the North Atlantic Gyre. Biogeosciences 2015, 12, 1249– 1256, DOI: 10.5194/bg-12-1249-2015There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 45Morét-Ferguson, S.; Law, K. L.; Proskurowski, G.; Murphy, E. K.; Peacock, E. E.; Reddy, C. M. The size, mass and composition of plastic debris in the western North Atlantic Ocean. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2010, 60, 1873– 1878, DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2010.07.02045The size, mass, and composition of plastic debris in the western North Atlantic OceanMoret-Ferguson, Skye; Law, Kara Lavender; Proskurowski, Giora; Murphy, Ellen K.; Peacock, Emily E.; Reddy, Christopher M.Marine Pollution Bulletin (2010), 60 (10), 1873-1878CODEN: MPNBAZ; ISSN:0025-326X. (Elsevier Ltd.)This study reports the first inventory of phys. properties of individual plastic debris in the North Atlantic. We analyzed 748 samples for size, mass, and material compn. collected from surface net tows on 11 expeditions from Cape Cod, Massachusetts to the Caribbean Sea between 1991 and 2007. Particles were mostly fragments less than 10 mm in size with nearly all lighter than 0.05 g. Material densities ranged from 0.808 to 1.24 g ml-1, with about half between 0.97 and 1.04 g ml-1, a range not typically found in virgin plastics. Elemental anal. suggests that samples in this d. range are consistent with polypropylene and polyethylene whose densities have increased, likely due to biofouling. Pelagic densities varied considerably from that of beach plastic debris, suggesting that plastic particles are modified during their residence at sea. These analyses provide clues in understanding particle fate and potential debris sources, and address ecol. implications of pelagic plastic debris.
- 46Galloway, T. S.; Cole, M.; Lewis, C. Interactions of microplastic debris throughout the marine ecosystem. Nature Ecol. Evol. 2017, 1, 0116, DOI: 10.1038/s41559-017-011646Interactions of microplastic debris throughout the marine ecosystemGalloway Tamara S; Cole Matthew; Lewis CeriNature ecology & evolution (2017), 1 (5), 116 ISSN:.Marine microscopic plastic (microplastic) debris is a modern societal issue, illustrating the challenge of balancing the convenience of plastic in daily life with the prospect of causing ecological harm by careless disposal. Here we develop the concept of microplastic as a complex, dynamic mixture of polymers and additives, to which organic material and contaminants can successively bind to form an 'ecocorona', increasing the density and surface charge of particles and changing their bioavailability and toxicity. Chronic exposure to microplastic is rarely lethal, but can adversely affect individual animals, reducing feeding and depleting energy stores, with knock-on effects for fecundity and growth. We explore the extent to which ecological processes could be impacted, including altered behaviours, bioturbation and impacts on carbon flux to the deep ocean. We discuss how microplastic compares with other anthropogenic pollutants in terms of ecological risk, and consider the role of science and society in tackling this global issue in the future.
- 47McDermid, K. J.; McMullen, T. L. Quantitative analysis of small-plastic debris on beaches in the Hawaiian archipelago. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2004, 48, 790– 794, DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2003.10.01747Quantitative analysis of small-plastic debris on beaches in the Hawaiian archipelagoMcDermid, Karla J.; McMullen, Tracy L.Marine Pollution Bulletin (2004), 48 (7-8), 790-794CODEN: MPNBAZ; ISSN:0025-326X. (Elsevier Science B.V.)Small-plastic beach debris from 9 coastal locations throughout the Hawaiian Archipelago was analyzed. At each beach, replicate 20 L samples of sediment were collected, sieved for debris 1-15 mm in size, sorted by type, counted and weighed. Small-plastic debris occurred on all of the beaches, but the greatest quantity was found at three of the most remote beaches on Midway Atoll and Moloka'i. Of the debris analyzed, 72% by wt. was plastic. A total of 19,100 pieces of plastic were collected from the 9 beaches, 11% of which was pre-prodn. plastic pellets. This study documents for the 1st time the presence of small-plastic debris on Hawaiian beaches and corroborates ests. of the abundance of plastics in the marine environment in the North Pacific.
- 48Yokota, K.; Waterfield, H.; Hastings, C.; Davidson, E.; Kwietniewski, E.; Wells, B. Finding the missing piece of the aquatic plastic pollution puzzle: Interaction between primary producers and microplastics. Limnol. & Oceanogr. 2017, 2, 91– 104, DOI: 10.1002/lol2.10040There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 49Hidalgo-Ruz, V.; Gutow, L.; Thompson, R. C.; Thiel, M. Microplastics in the Marine Environment: A Review of the Methods Used for Identification and Quantification. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 3060– 3075, DOI: 10.1021/es203150549Microplastics in marine environment review of methods for identification and quantificationHidalgo-Ruz, Valeria; Gutow, Lars; Thompson, Richard C.; Thiel, MartinEnvironmental Science & Technology (2012), 46 (6), 3060-3075CODEN: ESTHAG; ISSN:0013-936X. (American Chemical Society)This review of 68 studies compares the methodologies used for the identification and quantification of microplastics from the marine environment. Three main sampling strategies were identified: selective, vol.-reduced, and bulk sampling. Most sediment samples came from sandy beaches at the high tide line, and most seawater samples were taken at the sea surface using neuston nets. Four steps were distinguished during sample processing: d. sepn., filtration, sieving, and visual sorting of microplastics. Visual sorting was one of the most commonly used methods for the identification of microplastics (using type, shape, degrdn. stage, and color as criteria). Chem. and phys. characteristics (e.g., specific d.) were also used. The most reliable method to identify the chem. compn. of microplastics is by IR spectroscopy. Most studies reported that plastic fragments were polyethylene and polypropylene polymers. Units commonly used for abundance ests. are "items per m2" for sediment and sea surface studies and "items per m3" for water column studies. Mesh size of sieves and filters used during sampling or sample processing influence abundance ests. Most studies reported two main size ranges of microplastics: (i) 500 μm-5 mm, which are retained by a 500 μm sieve/net, and (ii) 1-500 μm, or fractions thereof that are retained on filters. We recommend that future programs of monitoring continue to distinguish these size fractions, but we suggest standardized sampling procedures which allow the spatiotemporal comparison of microplastic abundance across marine environments.
- 50Ivar do Sul, J.; Costa, M. F.; Fillmann, G. Microplastics in the pelagic environment around oceanic islands of the Western Tropical Atlantic Ocean. Water, Air, & Soil Poll. 2014, 225, 2004, DOI: 10.1007/s11270-014-2004-zThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 51Bodek, S.; Jerolmack, D. J. Breaking down chipping and fragmentation in sediment transport: the control of material strength. Earth Surf. Dynam. 2021, 9, 1531– 1543, DOI: 10.5194/esurf-9-1531-2021There is no corresponding record for this reference.
Supporting Information
Supporting Information
The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.2c03559.
Sampling conditions and overall count; abundancies and frequencies of categories per polymer type; abundancies and frequencies of shape categories; findings for polymer type category “other”; polymer type libraries; manual length and width measurements versus Ferrets diameter and bounding rectangle measurements; line classification; film classification; fragment classification; comparison of Ferrets diameter with bounding rectangle diameter; density distribution for particle length for film, fragment and line; density distribution for particle width; mixture model of film (2 class solution); mixture model of film (3 class solution); mixture model of fragments (3 class solution) (PDF)
Terms & Conditions
Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.