ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
Closing the Infrastructure Gap for Decarbonization: The Case for an Integrated Mineral Supply Agreement
My Activity

Figure 1Loading Img
    Perspective

    Closing the Infrastructure Gap for Decarbonization: The Case for an Integrated Mineral Supply Agreement
    Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

    • Saleem H. Ali
      Saleem H. Ali
      Department of Geography & Spatial Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware 19716, United States
      Sustainable Minerals Institute, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4070, Australia
    • Sophia Kalantzakos*
      Sophia Kalantzakos
      Department of Environmental Studies, New York University/NYU Abu Dhabi, New York, New York 10003, United States
      *Email: [email protected]
    • Roderick Eggert
      Roderick Eggert
      Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colorado 80401, United States
    • Roland Gauss
      Roland Gauss
      EIT RawMaterials, Berlin, 10789, Germany
      More by Roland Gauss
    • Constantine Karayannopoulos
      Constantine Karayannopoulos
      Neo Performance Materials Inc., Toronto, Ontario M5H 3T9, Canada
    • Julie Klinger
      Julie Klinger
      Department of Geography & Spatial Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware 19716, United States
    • Xiaoyu Pu
      Xiaoyu Pu
      Department of Political Science, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada 89557, United States
      More by Xiaoyu Pu
    • Kristin Vekasi
      Kristin Vekasi
      Department of Political Science and School of Policy and International Affairs, University of Maine, Orono, Maine 04469, United States
    • Robert K. Perrons
      Robert K. Perrons
      Queensland University of Technology, GPO Box 2434, Brisbane, Queensland 4001, Australia
      Centre for Strategy and Performance, University of Cambridge Cambridge, CB3 0FS, United Kingdom
    Other Access Options

    Environmental Science & Technology

    Cite this: Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022, 56, 22, 15280–15289
    Click to copy citationCitation copied!
    https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c05413
    Published October 26, 2022
    Copyright © 2022 American Chemical Society

    Abstract

    Click to copy section linkSection link copied!
    Abstract Image

    Significant amounts of feedstock metals will be required to build the infrastructure for the green energy transition. It is currently estimated, however, that the world may be facing an “infrastructure gap” that could prevent us from meeting United Nations Sustainable Development Goal targets. Prior investigations have focused on the extractive aspects of the mining industry to meet these targets and on looming bottlenecks and regional challenges in these upstream market segments. Scant attention has been paid to the downstream processing segments of the raw materials value chain, which also has a high degree of market concentration. Growing international tensions and geopolitical events have resulted in a shift toward “reshoring” and “near-shoring” of mining processing capabilities as regional powers attempt to make metal supply chains more secure. While increasing resilience, these shifts can also dilute the overall effectiveness of the global mining supply network and subsequently hamper the world’s ability to close the green energy infrastructure gap. We argue that broadening the remit of the International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA) to include coordinating these mission-critical metal processing functions can mitigate these issues. The G20 is one potential forum for enabling an integrated mineral processing agreement under the auspices of IRENA.

    Copyright © 2022 American Chemical Society

    Read this article

    To access this article, please review the available access options below.

    Get instant access

    Purchase Access

    Read this article for 48 hours. Check out below using your ACS ID or as a guest.

    Recommended

    Access through Your Institution

    You may have access to this article through your institution.

    Your institution does not have access to this content. Add or change your institution or let them know you’d like them to include access.

    Cited By

    Click to copy section linkSection link copied!
    Citation Statements
    Explore this article's citation statements on scite.ai

    This article is cited by 21 publications.

    1. Xin Ouyang, Litao Liu, Wu Chen, Chao Wang, Xin Sun, Canfei He, Gang Liu. Systematic Risks of the Global Lithium Supply Chain Network: From Static Topological Structures to Cascading Failure Dynamics. Environmental Science & Technology 2024, 58 (50) , 22135-22147. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c10523
    2. Muhammad Jameel Labaran, Tariq Masood. Technological frontiers: addressing renewable energy supply chain and sustainability challenges. Discover Sustainability 2025, 6 (1) https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-025-00909-3
    3. Javed Aslam, Kee-hung Lai, Ahmad Al Hanbali, Nokhaiz Tariq Khan. Blockchain solution for supply chains & logistics challenges: An empirical investigation. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 2025, 198 , 104134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2025.104134
    4. M. Cristina Rulli, Paolo D’Odorico, Nikolas Galli, Reju S. John, Renata L. Muylaert, Monia Santini, David T. S. Hayman. Land Use Change and Infectious Disease Emergence. Reviews of Geophysics 2025, 63 (2) https://doi.org/10.1029/2022RG000785
    5. Yongguang Zhu, Xing Ye, Saleem H. Ali, Shiquan Dou, Jinhua Cheng, Gang Liu, Deyi Xu. Resource substitutability path for China’s energy storage between lithium and vanadium. iScience 2025, 28 (5) , 112462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2025.112462
    6. Lauren MacDonald, Dandan Zhang, Aydın Alptekinoğlu, Athanasios K. Karamalidis. Enhancing the Resilience of Platinum Group Metal Supply Chains: Mine to (Re)use. Sustainable Development 2025, 1 https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3499
    7. Russell McKenna, Johan Lilliestam, Heidi U. Heinrichs, Jann Weinand, Johannes Schmidt, Iain Staffell, Andrea N. Hahmann, Peter Burgherr, Arne Burdack, Monika Bucha, Ruihong Chen, Michael Klingler, Paul Lehmann, Jens Lowitzsch, Riccardo Novo, James Price, Romain Sacchi, Patrick Scherhaufer, Eva M. Schöll, Piero Visconti, Paola Velasco-Herrejón, Marianne Zeyringer, Luis Ramirez Camargo. System impacts of wind energy developments: Key research challenges and opportunities. Joule 2025, 9 (1) , 101799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2024.11.016
    8. Cristina Di Stefano, Luciano Fratocchi, Fernando Merino, Carmen Martínez-Mora. Manufacturing reshoring and sustainable development goals: A home versus host country perspective. SSRN Electronic Journal 2025, 10 https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5255175
    9. Brandon Marc Finn, Adam Simon, Joshua Newell. Decarbonization and social justice: The case for artisanal and small-scale mining. Energy Research & Social Science 2024, 117 , 103733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2024.103733
    10. Caroline Acen, Olusola Bamisile, Dongsheng Cai, Chiagoziem C. Ukwuoma, Sandra Obiora, Qi Huang, Dilber Uzun Ozsahin, Humphrey Adun. The complementary role of carbon dioxide removal: A catalyst for advancing the COP28 pledges towards the 1.5 °C Paris Agreement target. Science of The Total Environment 2024, 947 , 174302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.174302
    11. KLEITON GONCALVES LOVATI, DÉBORA FARIA, DOMÍCIA OLIVEIRA, HELENA HERMETO, LUISA SOUZA GONZAGA, LUIZ HENRIQUE LOPES RIGOTTO, EDUARDO PESSOTTI RANGEL, LUIS HENRIQUE RODRIGUES. VESO: VALE EMISSION SYSTEMIC OPTIMIZER. 2024, 80-90. https://doi.org/10.5151/2594-3626-40797
    12. Yousef Ghorbani, Steven E. Zhang, Julie E. Bourdeau, Nelson S. Chipangamate, Derek H. Rose, Imraan Valodia, Glen T. Nwaila. The strategic role of lithium in the green energy transition: Towards an OPEC-style framework for green energy-mineral exporting countries (GEMEC). Resources Policy 2024, 90 , 104737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.104737
    13. Chunyang Luo, Yang Liu, Lu Pan, Fucheng Yang. Navigating mineral policy development challenges in the global south using analytic hierarchy process. Resources Policy 2024, 90 , 104797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.104797
    14. Collin Wilkinson. Glass and a carbon‐free United States: What is glass's role in the upcoming green revolution?. Journal of the American Ceramic Society 2024, 107 (3) , 1533-1542. https://doi.org/10.1111/jace.19360
    15. Cristina Di Stefano, Luciano Fratocchi, Carmen Martínez‐Mora, Fernando Merino. Manufacturing reshoring and sustainable development goals: A home versus host country perspective. Sustainable Development 2024, 32 (1) , 863-875. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2710
    16. Wei-Qiang Chen, Matthew J. Eckelman, Benjamin Sprecher, Wei Chen, Peng Wang. Interdependence in rare earth element supply between China and the United States helps stabilize global supply chains. One Earth 2024, 7 (2) , 242-252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2024.01.011
    17. Philippe Le Billon. Illicit Financial Flows, Extractive Sectors, and the Energy Transition: Building State Capacity to Finance the SDGs. Revue internationale de politique de développement 2024, 17 https://doi.org/10.4000/11q9g
    18. Saleem H. Ali, Penda Diallo, Apoli Bertrand Kameni, Philippe Le Billon, Kopo Oromeng, Kyle Frankel Davis, Edward R. Carr. In Africa, “climate‐smart” conservation must be coupled with poverty alleviation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2023, 120 (44) https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2309279120
    19. Vlado Vivoda. Friend-shoring and critical minerals: Exploring the role of the Minerals Security Partnership. Energy Research & Social Science 2023, 100 , 103085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2023.103085
    20. Sophia Kalantzakos, Indra Overland, Roman Vakulchuk. Decarbonisation and Critical Materials in the Context of Fraught Geopolitics: Europe’s Distinctive Approach to a Net Zero Future. The International Spectator 2023, 58 (1) , 3-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/03932729.2022.2157090
    21. Sophia Kalantzakos. Between Rocks and Hard Places: Geopolitics of Net Zero Futures and the Tech Imperium. 2023, 3-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25577-9_1

    Environmental Science & Technology

    Cite this: Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022, 56, 22, 15280–15289
    Click to copy citationCitation copied!
    https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c05413
    Published October 26, 2022
    Copyright © 2022 American Chemical Society

    Article Views

    2126

    Altmetric

    -

    Citations

    Learn about these metrics

    Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

    Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

    The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.