Mass-Balance-Consistent Geological Stock Accounting: A New Approach toward Sustainable Management of Mineral ResourcesClick to copy article linkArticle link copied!
- Mark U. Simoni*Mark U. Simoni*E-mail: [email protected]; mobile phone: +4746777449.Geological Survey of Norway, Leiv Eirikssons vei 39, 7040 Trondheim, NorwayNorwegian University of Science and Technology, Industrial Ecology Programme, Høgskoleringen 5, NO-7034 Trondheim, NorwayMore by Mark U. Simoni
- Johannes A. DrielsmaJohannes A. DrielsmaDrielsma Resources Europe, 2585 GT The Hague, NetherlandsMore by Johannes A. Drielsma
- Magnus EricssonMagnus EricssonLuleå University of Technology, Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social Sciences, 97187 Luleå, SwedenMore by Magnus Ericsson
- Andrew G. GunnAndrew G. GunnBritish Geological Survey, Keyworth, Nottingham NG12 5GG, United KingdomMore by Andrew G. Gunn
- Sigurd HeibergSigurd HeibergPetronavit AS, C/o Heiberg, Stokkahagen 23, 4022 Stavanger, NorwayMore by Sigurd Heiberg
- Tom A. HeldalTom A. HeldalGeological Survey of Norway, Leiv Eirikssons vei 39, 7040 Trondheim, NorwayMore by Tom A. Heldal
- Nedal T. NassarNedal T. NassarU.S. Geological Survey, National Mineral Information Center, 12201 Sunrise Valley Dr., MS 988, Reston, Virginia 20192, United StatesMore by Nedal T. Nassar
- Evi PetavratziEvi PetavratziBritish Geological Survey, Keyworth, Nottingham NG12 5GG, United KingdomMore by Evi Petavratzi
- Daniel B. MüllerDaniel B. MüllerNorwegian University of Science and Technology, Industrial Ecology Programme, Høgskoleringen 5, NO-7034 Trondheim, NorwayMore by Daniel B. Müller
Abstract
Global resource extraction raises concerns about environmental pressures and the security of mineral supply. Strategies to address these concerns depend on robust information on natural resource endowments, and on suitable methods to monitor and model their changes over time. However, current mineral resources and reserves reporting and accounting workflows are poorly suited for addressing mineral depletion or answering questions about the long-term sustainable supply. Our integrative review finds that the lack of a robust theoretical concept and framework for mass-balance (MB)-consistent geological stock accounting hinders systematic industry-government data integration, resource governance, and strategy development. We evaluate the existing literature on geological stock accounting, identify shortcomings of current monitoring of mine production, and outline a conceptual framework for MB-consistent system integration based on material flow analysis (MFA). Our synthesis shows that recent developments in Earth observation, geoinformation management, and sustainability reporting act as catalysts that make MB-consistent geological stock accounting increasingly feasible. We propose first steps for its implementation and anticipate that our perspective as “resource realists” will facilitate the integration of geological and anthropogenic material systems, help secure future mineral supply, and support the global sustainability transition.
This publication is licensed under
License Summary*
You are free to share(copy and redistribute) this article in any medium or format and to adapt(remix, transform, and build upon) the material for any purpose, even commercially within the parameters below:
Creative Commons (CC): This is a Creative Commons license.
Attribution (BY): Credit must be given to the creator.
*Disclaimer
This summary highlights only some of the key features and terms of the actual license. It is not a license and has no legal value. Carefully review the actual license before using these materials.
License Summary*
You are free to share(copy and redistribute) this article in any medium or format and to adapt(remix, transform, and build upon) the material for any purpose, even commercially within the parameters below:
Creative Commons (CC): This is a Creative Commons license.
Attribution (BY): Credit must be given to the creator.
*Disclaimer
This summary highlights only some of the key features and terms of the actual license. It is not a license and has no legal value. Carefully review the actual license before using these materials.
License Summary*
You are free to share(copy and redistribute) this article in any medium or format and to adapt(remix, transform, and build upon) the material for any purpose, even commercially within the parameters below:
Creative Commons (CC): This is a Creative Commons license.
Attribution (BY): Credit must be given to the creator.
*Disclaimer
This summary highlights only some of the key features and terms of the actual license. It is not a license and has no legal value. Carefully review the actual license before using these materials.
1. Introduction
2. A Brief Review of Mass-Balance-Consistent Accounting
The system structure of connected flows carries additional information about the origin and destination of the flows.
Mass balance equations make the system structure explicit and can close data gaps without requiring additional data collection.
The explicit system definition allows for balancing each process for total mass and all chemical elements, and facilitates data harmonization and integration (e.g., to avoid double-counting).
The MB principle is useful for sensitivity analysis and data reconciliation. It enables robust accounting and scenario models for physical matter in the “real world”.
Figure 1
Figure 1. Simplified material flow analysis (MFA) system of the global mineral material cycle. Material flows (arrows) connect material transformation, transport, market, and storage processes (blue boxes) with or without material stocks (white boxes). Highlights in red identify three key issues that require mass-balance-consistent mineral information: geological stock accounting (section 3), monitoring of mine production (section 4), and physical systems integration (sections 5 and 6).
3. The Concept of Geological Stocks
Figure 2
Figure 2. Different approaches for geological stock accounting: (a) reserves included as fixed stocks within the system boundary; (b) exploration interpreted as a (in)flow of material; (c) geosphere excluded from the system boundary; (d) multidimensional and mass-balance (MB)-consistent geological stock model. Approaches (a) and (b) violate material flow analysis (MFA) principles, (c) is permissible but uninformative, and (d) is the spatiotemporally explicit conceptual approach.
3.1. Using Reserves to Calculate Depletion (Figure 2a)
3.2. Modeling Exploration as an Inflow (Figure 2b)
3.3. MB-Consistency without Geological Stocks (Figure 2c)
3.4. MB-Consistent Geological Stock Accounting (Figure 2d)
4. Physical Monitoring of Mine Production
Figure 3
Figure 3. Physical monitoring of mine production. (a) Mine planning: The natural characteristics of mineral deposits such as depth and ore grade, combined with mine design and operating efficiency, determine the expected (ex-ante) material flows. Figure not to scale, modified after ref (163). (b) Material flows and sustainability: Material flows of mining are interlinked with environmental, social, and governance (ESG) issues and tracking them is thus crucial for the Social License to Operate (SLO) and Sustainable Development License to Operate (SDLO). (c) Reference system for physical monitoring: A standardized material flow analysis (MFA) system definition with explicit reference points and a mutually agreed-upon terminology facilitates systematic reporting and enables mass-balance-consistent monitoring of mine production flows.
4.1. Industry Reporting of Mine Production Flows
4.2. Government Aggregation of Production Data
4.3. Reference Systems for Consistent Reporting
5. Geomodeling of Material Stocks and Flows
5.1. Geomodels for Stock Accounting and Resource Classification
Figure 4
Figure 4. Multidimensional geological stock accounting illustrated as a cube with 27 voxels at three reference points (t0, t1, t2). (a) Geological stock accounting monitors changes of the physical domain over time and shows historical extraction as a measured reduction of the total stock S by 0.5 voxels from 27 → 26.5 during t0 → t1 and anticipated further reduction 26.5 → 26 during t1 → t2, assuming stock scenario S1. Exploration activity changes only the attributes (e.g., ore grade) and associated uncertainty of the geological stock characterization (2 voxels from 0% → 25–50% confidence during t0 → t1, and from 25 to 50% →>75% during t1 → t2, assuming stock scenario S1). (b) Resource classification acts as a filter domain that selectively appraises parts of the geological stock to report reserves and resources, while omitting the rest of the geological stock including known but low grade (barren) voxels; Individual geological stock voxels may remain physically unchanged but may nevertheless be reclassified as time passes (1 resources to 1 reserves during t0 → t1) or vice versa (1 reserves to 1 resources during t1 → t2 assuming resource classification scenario S1,ii(t2)). (c) Uncertainty attribution is considered as two separate steps: step c[a] addresses solely the uncertainty of the physical attributes for stock quantification; step c[b] incorporates the additional uncertainty of socioeconomic assumptions of resource classification. Color hue (red, green, blue) represents three ore grade classes relative to average crustal abundance (depleted, average to low grade, enriched); color saturation (0–25, 25–50, 50–75, 75–100) shows the confidence in the results (unknown to complete knowledge). MB, mass-balance.
5.2. Model Uncertainty
6. Framework for Systems Integration
6.1. The Current Situation: Data Fragmentation and Limited Coordination (Figure 5a)
Figure 5
Figure 5. (a) Today’s information flows on nonrenewable mineral resources result in incomplete, fragmented, and inconsistent knowledge that is unsuitable for addressing systemic issues related to sustainable resource management. (b) The proposed monitoring of physical systems is based on an Open Government Data (OGD) framework that supports multidimensional geodata integration, mass-balance (MB) consistent geological stock accounting, and spatiotemporally explicit material systems governance. PPP: Public-Private Partnership; SLO: Social License to Operate; SDLO: Sustainable Development License to Operate; GSO: Geological Survey Organization; EO: Earth Observation; IoT: Internet of Things; BIM/CIM: Building/City Information Modeling; ML: Machine Learning; AI Artificial Intelligence; AR/VR: Augmented/Virtual Reality; G2B, G2G, B2B, B2G: Government-to-Business data sharing, etc.
6.2. Facilitating Integrated Monitoring of Physical Systems (Figure 5b)
(i) | Earth Observation (EO) and Geomodeling. Earth observation (EO) continuously expands our knowledge of an urbanizing planet (226−228) with exponentially increasing amounts of global-scale, multidimensional time-series data. Data acquisition technologies such as satellites and drones that interact the Internet of Things (IoT) facilitate both global mapping of mining land use, (229) and high-resolution mine-site-scale monitoring of production stockpiles and tailings storage facilities. (230,231) Such remote and in situ measurements are key to the extractive industry’s Mining 4.0 vision of smart and connected digital transformation. (232,233) It is estimated that 95% of EO data have never been accessed, partly due to challenges with managing its volume, variety, veracity, velocity, and the difficulty to extract value (the five Vs). (222) This indicates that there is a huge potential for Big Earth Data fusion, (222) geospatial artificial intelligence (GeoAI), (234) and cloud-based computing, which together can help improve data accessibility and support investigative approaches also for users with limited knowledge. (235,236) Simultaneously, free or relatively inexpensive access to open government servers (223) or proprietary platforms such as Google’s Earth Engine (237) and Microsoft’s Planetary Computer, (238) coupled with geodata modeling environments including the Open Data Cube (ODC) (236,239) and advances in data processing (240) and visualization technologies, (241−243) facilitate large-area high-resolution geomodeling. (244−246) Digital twins (247,248) may soon become standard tools for modeling the geological subsurface together with production facilities at mine-site (plant) scale, and may be part of larger models that integrate geological information with urban-scale building- and city information models (BIM/CIM) into regional GeoBIM systems. (249,250) Indeed, two decades after the former Vice President of the USA Al Gore outlined his vision of a “Digital Earth”, (251) the UN-led Coalition for Digital Environmental Sustainability (252) has recently declared the development of a “Planetary Digital Twin” a strategic priority for the sustainability transformation. Given the accelerating rate of innovation, we can imagine multidimensional (e.g., 6D = x,y,z + time + scale/resolution + uncertainty) (253,254) Digital Earth Science Platforms (254−256) that allow us to model historical, monitor ongoing, and simulate future geological and anthropogenic stock changes and material flows through space and time. | ||||
(ii) | Multidimensional Geoinformation Management. The value of data is maximized by reuse. (257) Standards and protocols such as the forthcoming ISO 19123-1 on multidimensional “coverages” (256) and the “Spatial Data on the Web Best Practices” (258) facilitate sharing and integration of georeferenced multidimensional data with their original granularity (triple-lined arrows). Standardization can be voluntary or mandatory: the European INSPIRE Directive on establishing an infrastructure for spatial information, (259) for instance, defines legally binding goals for geodata harmonization across European countries, while the International Union of Geological Sciences follows a voluntary “Big Science Initiative” standardization approach. (260,261) Development of a multidimensional “Open Government Data (OGD5.0) Framework for Physical Accounting” can draw on such efforts (cf. Figures 4, 5), while spatiotemporally explicit and MB-consistent reporting can support mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive (119) data integration and the establishment of digital twins and “cyber-physical systems”. (262) Multistakeholder involvement and Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) (263) can commit to “co-create” (264) the OGD5.0 for secure, consistent, and integrated Government-to-Government (G2G) and Government-to-Business (G2B) information exchange. (218,265) For governments, which serve as stewards for data and natural resources on behalf of society, a material systems approach can help close data gaps, reduce industry-government information asymmetries, and build public knowledge capital to support long-term sustainable development. The industry can benefit from access to previously unavailable information through the B2B data trade. This would allow partners to exploit the collective data volume though machine learning (ML), artificial intelligence (AI), (234,266,267) and digital laboratories with augmented and virtual reality (AR/VR), (268,269) and can inform mineral systems analysis (270) and exploration, (47,217) process innovation, (266) and supply chain management. (103) Similarly, transdisciplinary stakeholder collaborations (271) can contribute to joint problem solving. | ||||
(iii) | Policy Trends and Best Practice Examples. Knowledge sharing between government and industry, and across supply chains, is a key challenge for mineral resource governance. (156,272) The FAIR (273) and OGD (274) principles, OECD Recommendations, (275) and the Integrated Geospatial Information (276) and Global Statistical Geospatial Frameworks (277) provide high-level guidance for addressing “data and organizational silos”. (278) However, additional efforts are needed to ensure more effective data collection (e.g., to avoid data duplication and target key gaps), facilitate better data integration (e.g., georeferencing, MFA system diagrams/flowsheets with explicit data reference points), and promote data reuse (e.g., FAIR principles, PPPs). Various studies have found that voluntary reporting commitments by mining companies emphasized documentation of compliance over actual data disclosure, (159,279) failed to guarantee timely and granular project-by-project level reporting, (280−282) and had limited impact on mine-site level action. (148,279) In response, governments are called upon to use their legislative, regulatory, and policy tools to implement new frameworks that support systematic ESG reporting (cf. S2) (53,56,283) and granular data disclosure. (194,283−288) Governments could use a common physical systems approach to monitor and manage material systems, and to set predictable but yet flexible framework conditions (263) that allow the extractive industries to compete with their best capabilities for securing future mineral supply. By inviting/requiring mining and exploration companies to submit collected geodata into secure public databases, long-term public knowledge and value creation can be maximized. (160) MB-consistent monitoring can promote transparency (e.g., materials certification, traceability) that helps build public trust, contributes to fighting theft, corruption, and tax fraud (e.g., fraudulent transfer pricing) and can ensure that mining activities achieve their project-specific commercial interests, while fulfilling their broader societal obligations toward the SDGs. (94,146,147) |
(1) | the European Open Data Directive, which requires from its member States that “public sector bodies and public undertakings shall make their documents available [...] in formats that are open, machine-readable, accessible, findable, and re-usable [...] at the best level of precision and granularity”. (296) Six thematic categories of high-value data sets are highlighted: geospatial, Earth observation and environment, meteorological, statistical, company information and ownership, and mobility. (297) Moreover, the European Commission announced in its European strategy for data (167) that it will explore a regulatory framework to govern the public sector’s reuse of privately held data of public interest, and will launch a strategic “Destination Earth” initiative to develop a very high precision digital model of the Earth. | ||||
(2) | the Dutch law on subsurface information, which establishes the Dutch National Key Registry of the Subsurface (BRO) as a central data repository to collect, store, and manage all publicly funded subsurface data. (298) A crucial aspect of the BRO is that it integrates confidential personal and industry information related to licensing and use, and that its stepwise implementation is intended to ultimately include data on all subsurface construction activities including measurements related to exploration, extraction, and storage of minerals and geothermal heat. | ||||
(3) | the Norwegian National Data Repository for petroleum exploration and production data (Diskos), which is a public-private partnership established in 1992 as a joint venture between the Norwegian government and the oil companies on the Norwegian Continental Shelf. (299) Diskos ensures secure, efficient, and standardized data management on behalf of its members, with shared overheads and added benefits. The system holds all the data of all licensees including detailed project metrics (i.e., all geological data, time-based forecasts, investment and operating cost schedules, production, emissions, cash flows etc.). (300) This reduces individual data handling costs as company repositories are no longer required, allows business-to-business (B2B) trade of entitlements to confidential data, and facilitates business-to-government (B2G) reporting. Although company data remain confidential, they are accessible for authorized government processes. This decreases the reporting burden, expedites processing, and reduces administrative costs because the government already has access to the information it requires for taxation and resource governance. Diskos also incorporates the information that financial regulators typically require for stock market disclosure, which instills confidence, promotes transparency, and ensures consistency between industry reporting and government inventories. By leveraging the “digital economy” (268) for exploration and minerals development, (301) common repositories can stimulate data reuse, value maximation in mining, and more transparent taxation. Finally, Diskos contributes significantly to expanding Norway’s collective knowledge capital as new data on licensed and unlicensed areas are continuously integrated. This information will eventually be made public as the needs for confidentiality cease or when licenses expire or are relinquished. |
7. Implementing Physical Monitoring
(i) | Review and Adapt Policy Frameworks and Legislation for Physical Accounting. Intergovernmental bodies and governments can review current mineral resource, mine production, and ESG reporting to identify their key gaps and limitations with focus on geodata integration and material stock and flow analysis. To clarify information under their stewardship, they may use their platforms to showcase typical applications and limitations of current data and outline key benefits of mass-balance-consistent accounting. Next steps may include defining roles and responsibilities across stakeholders to formalize data sharing and standardization; assigning explicit mandates to address data fragmentation and promote cross-institutional integration; enacting new policies for systematic monitoring of the physical human-natural system; and developing data-driven scenario models to inform decision-making. International partners may include the UN Statistics Division (UNSD), International Resource Panel (IRP), UNECE Expert Group on Resource Management (EGRM), UN Initiative on Global Geospatial Information Management (UN-GGIM), and UN-led Coalition for Digital Environmental Sustainability (CODES). On a country-level, relevant bodies include GSOs, mining directorates, mapping and planning authorities, environment agencies, and statistical offices, as well as professional associations, NGOs, academia, and industry. | ||||
(ii) | Develop Infrastructures for Multidimensional Geoinformation. Through transdisciplinary government mandates and partnerships, appointed agencies and relevant stakeholders can review how technical data standards, reporting workflows and accounting systems (e.g., ISO, (256) INSPIRE, (259) UNFC, (116) SEEA, (145) UNEP (194)) may be adapted to facilitate systematic and granular disclosure in-line with OGD, FAIR, and SDLO principles, and how to automate consistent integration for multidimensional minerals-related material stock and flow information. A first step toward promoting research and development of technical infrastructures could make it mandatory for companies and data providers to map their current reporting of materials-related stock and flow data using MFA system diagrams (flowsheets), standard terminology, and explicit reference points. Funding bodies and relevant stakeholders may consider pilot projects to evaluate this idea, define and map relevant terms, and initiate the development of common data models for physical monitoring, multiscale modeling, and MB-consistent accounting. |
8. Conclusions
Supporting Information
The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.3c03088.
Materials and methods section describing literature selection and bibliometric analysis; timeline of historical events with reference list; notes on mass balance consistency in financial reporting and the UN System of Environmental-Economic Accounting (PDF)
Terms & Conditions
Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.
Acknowledgments
We appreciate the insightful comments and valuable feedback provided by our three anonymous reviewers, which greatly contributed to refining this manuscript. We also acknowledge the diligent efforts of the editor, Matthew Eckelman, whose guidance supported the publishing process. M.U.S. thanks the Norwegian University of Science and Technology for funding this research. We gratefully acknowledge support for inputs though the MinFuture project under the European Horizon 2020 Grant Agreement No. 730330. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.
References
This article references 306 other publications.
- 1Smith, A. The Wealth of Nations; J. M. Dent & Sons LTD: London, 1776; Vol. 1.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 2Solow, R. M. Is the End of the World at Hand?. Challenge 1973, 16 (1), 39– 50, DOI: 10.1080/05775132.1973.11469961Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 3Stiglitz, J. E. Growth with Exhaustible Natural Resources: Efficient and Optimal Growth Paths. Symposium on the economics of exhaustible resources 1974, 41, 123– 137, DOI: 10.2307/2296377Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 4Tilton, J. E.; Crowson, P. C. F.; DeYoung, J. H.; Eggert, R. G.; Ericsson, M.; Guzmán, J. I.; Humphreys, D.; Lagos, G.; Maxwell, P.; Radetzki, M.; Singer, D. A.; Wellmer, F.-W. Public policy and future mineral supplies. Resour. Policy 2018, 57, 55– 60, DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2018.01.006Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 5Castillo, E.; Eggert, R. Reconciling Diverging Views on Mineral Depletion: A Modified Cumulative Availability Curve Applied to Copper Resources. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2020, 161, 104896, DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104896Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 6Beckerman, W. Economists, Scientists, and Environmental Catastrophe. Oxford Econ. Pap. 1972, 24 (3), 327– 44, DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.oep.a041225Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 7Adelman, M. A. Mineral Depletion, with Special Reference to Petroleum. Rev. Econ. Statist. 1990, 72 (1), 1– 10, DOI: 10.2307/2109733Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 8Krausmann, F.; Lauk, C.; Haas, W.; Wiedenhofer, D. From resource extraction to outflows of wastes and emissions: The socioeconomic metabolism of the global economy, 1900–2015. Global Environ. Change 2018, 52, 131– 140, DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.07.003Google Scholar8https://chemport.cas.org/services/resolver?origin=ACS&resolution=options&coi=1%3ACAS%3A280%3ADC%252BB3cjltVOktw%253D%253D&md5=6c4f56838db3db3f29ac058c0bfa1ce5From resource extraction to outflows of wastes and emissions: The socioeconomic metabolism of the global economy, 1900-2015Krausmann Fridolin; Lauk Christian; Haas Willi; Wiedenhofer DominikGlobal environmental change : human and policy dimensions (2018), 52 (), 131-140 ISSN:0959-3780.The size and structure of the socioeconomic metabolism are key for the planet's sustainability. In this article, we provide a consistent assessment of the development of material flows through the global economy in the period 1900-2015 using material flow accounting in combination with results from dynamic stock-flow modelling. Based on this approach, we can trace materials from extraction to their use, their accumulation in in-use stocks and finally to outflows of wastes and emissions and provide a comprehensive picture of the evolution of societies metabolism during global industrialization. This enables outlooks on inflows and outflows, which environmental policy makers require for pursuing strategies towards a more sustainable resource use. Over the whole time period, we observe a growth in global material extraction by a factor of 12 to 89 Gt/yr. A shift from materials for dissipative use to stock building materials resulted in a massive increase of in-use stocks of materials to 961 Gt in 2015. Since materials increasingly accumulate in stocks, outflows of wastes are growing at a slower pace than inputs. In 2015, outflows amounted to 58 Gt/yr, of which 35% were solid wastes and 25% emissions, the reminder being excrements, dissipative use and water vapor. Our results indicate a significant acceleration of global material flows since the beginning of the 21(st) century. We show that this acceleration, which took off in 2002, was not a short-term phenomenon but continues since more than a decade. Between 2002 and 2015, global material extraction increased by 53% in spite of the 2008 economic crisis. Based on detailed data on material stocks and flows and information on their long-term historic development, we make a rough estimate of what a global convergence of metabolic patterns at the current level in industrialized countries paired with a continuation of past efficiency gains might imply for global material demand. We find that in such a scenario until 2050 average global metabolic rates double to 22 t/cap/yr and material extraction increases to around 218 Gt/yr. Overall the analysis indicates a grand challenge calling for urgent action, fostering a continuous and considerable reduction of material flows to acceptable levels.
- 9Stuermer, M. 150 years of boom and bust: what drives mineral commodity prices?. Macroecon. Dynam. 2018, 22 (03), 702– 717, DOI: 10.1017/S136510051600050XGoogle ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 10Stuermer, M. Non-renewable resource extraction over the long term: empirical evidence from global copper production. Miner. Econ. 2022, 35 (3), 617– 625, DOI: 10.1007/s13563-022-00352-0Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 11Wellmer, F.-W. What we have learned from the past and how we should look forward. Miner. Econ. 2022, 35 (3), 765– 795, DOI: 10.1007/s13563-021-00296-xGoogle ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 12Pooley, G.; Tupy, M. Simon Abundance Index: A New Way to Measure Availability of Resources; Policy Analysis Number 857; Cato Institute, 2018.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 13Malthus, T. R. An Essay on the Principle of Population, As It Affects the Future Improvement of Society; J. Johnson in St Paul’s Church-yard: London, 1798; Vol. 1.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 14Jevons, W. S. The Coal Question: An Inquiry Concerning the Progress of the Nation and the Probable Exhaustion of Our Coal-Mines; Macmillan and Co.: London, 1865.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 15Hubbert, M. K. Nuclear energy and the fossil fuels. In Drilling and Production Practice; American Petroleum Institute: San Antonio, TX, 1956; p 40.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 16Meadows, D. H.; Meadows, D. L.; Randers, J.; Behrens, I. I. I.; W, W. The Limits to Growth: A Report for the Club of Rome’s Project on the Predicament of Mankind; Universe Books: New York, 1972.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 17Georgescu-Roegen, N. Energy and economic myths. Southern Econ. J. 1975, 41, 347– 381, DOI: 10.2307/1056148Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 18Daly, H. E. Reply to Solow/Stiglitz. Ecological Economics 1997, 22 (3), 271– 273, DOI: 10.1016/S0921-8009(97)00086-4Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 19Lawn, P. On the Ehrlich-Simon bet: Both were unskilled and Simon was lucky. Ecological Economics 2010, 69 (11), 2045– 2046, DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.07.009Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 20Wellmer, F.-W. Geology and Mining: A Symbiotic Cooperation?!. Mining 2022, 2 (2), 402– 424, DOI: 10.3390/mining2020021Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 21Global Material Resources Outlook to 2060 - Economic Drivers and Environmental Consequences In Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Paris; OECD, 2019; p 212.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 22Global Resources Outlook 2019: Natural Resources for the Future We Want; United Nations Environment Programme, International Resource Panel: Paris, 2019; DTI/2226/NA.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 23Northey, S.; Mohr, S.; Mudd, G. M.; Weng, Z.; Giurco, D. Modelling future copper ore grade decline based on a detailed assessment of copper resources and mining. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2014, 83, 190– 201, DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.10.005Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 24Calvo, G.; Mudd, G.; Valero, A.; Valero, A. Decreasing Ore Grades in Global Metallic Mining: A Theoretical Issue or a Global Reality?. Resources 2016, 5 (4), 36, DOI: 10.3390/resources5040036Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 25Conde, M. Resistance to Mining. A Review. Ecological Economics 2017, 132, 80– 90, DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.08.025Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 26Andrews, T.; Gamu, J.; Billon, P. L.; Oh, C. H.; Reyes, D.; Shin, J. Role of Host Governments in Enabling or Preventing Conflict Associated with Mining, Full-length version; United Nations Development Programme: New York, 2018.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 27The IPBES Assessment Report on Land Degradation and Restoration; Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES): Bonn, Germany, 2018. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3237392 .Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 28Rötzer, N.; Schmidt, M. Historical, Current, and Future Energy Demand from Global Copper Production and Its Impact on Climate Change. Resources 2020, 9 (4), 44, DOI: 10.3390/resources9040044Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 29Luckeneder, S.; Giljum, S.; Schaffartzik, A.; Maus, V.; Tost, M. Surge in global metal mining threatens vulnerable ecosystems. Global Environ. Change 2021, 69, 102303, DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102303Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 30Turner, G. Is Global Collapse Imminent? An Updated Comparison of the Limits to Growth with Historical Data; Melbourne Sustainable Society Institute, The University of Melbourne: 2014.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 31Steffen, W.; Broadgate, W.; Deutsch, L.; Gaffney, O.; Ludwig, C. The trajectory of the Anthropocene: The Great Acceleration. Anthropocene Review 2015, 2 (1), 81– 98, DOI: 10.1177/2053019614564785Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 32Northey, S. A.; Mudd, G. M.; Werner, T. T.; Jowitt, S. M.; Haque, N.; Yellishetty, M.; Weng, Z. The exposure of global base metal resources to water criticality, scarcity and climate change. Global Environ. Change 2017, 44, 109– 124, DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.04.004Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 33Savinova, E.; Evans, C.; Lebre, E.; Stringer, M.; Azadi, M.; Valenta, R.K. Will global cobalt supply meet demand? The geological, mineral processing, production and geographic risk profile of cobalt. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2023, 190, 106855, DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106855Google Scholar33https://chemport.cas.org/services/resolver?origin=ACS&resolution=options&coi=1%3ACAS%3A528%3ADC%252BB3sXns12rsA%253D%253D&md5=acc603584a796c4f9348a6fe813f12a0Will global cobalt supply meet demand? The geological, mineral processing, production and geographic risk profile of cobaltSavinova, E.; Evans, C.; Lebre, E.; Stringer, M.; Azadi, M.; Valenta, R. K.Resources, Conservation and Recycling (2023), 190 (), 106855CODEN: RCREEW; ISSN:0921-3449. (Elsevier B.V.)Cobalt prodn. is essential in supporting energy storage and electrification initiatives in the global transition to a low-carbon economy. The main aspects of cobalt prodn. are examd. through assessment of global demand and supply, the common geol. settings and mineral processing routes, and the assocd. situated environmental, social and governance (ESG) risk factors. The supply risk of cobalt is high, owing to its primary extn. as a byproduct during copper and nickel prodn. from several deposit types. Concurrent ESG risks create addnl. complexity at the development and operational stages. The immediate forecast trend is an increase in global demand for cobalt accommodated by a corresponding increase in the prodn. However, reducing the supply risk and mitigating the complexity of the ESG dimensions of currently undeveloped ore sources is key for sustainable metal prodn. Future cobalt projects' concurrent and innate interaction with different risk factors can only be managed if changes to mining operations are made, together with regulation of artisanal mining and reprocessing of mine waste streams for cobalt.
- 34Lusty, P. A. J.; Gunn, A. G. Challenges to global mineral resource security and options for future supply. Geological Society, London, Special Publications 2015, 393 (1), 265– 276, DOI: 10.1144/SP393.13Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 35Calvo, G.; Valero, A.; Valero, A. Assessing maximum production peak and resource availability of non-fuel mineral resources: Analyzing the influence of extractable global resources. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2017, 125, 208– 217, DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.06.009Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 36Turcheniuk, K.; Bondarev, D.; Singhal, V.; Yushin, G. Ten years left to redesign lithium-ion batteries. Nature 2018, 559 (7715), 467– 470, DOI: 10.1038/d41586-018-05752-3Google Scholar36https://chemport.cas.org/services/resolver?origin=ACS&resolution=options&coi=1%3ACAS%3A528%3ADC%252BC1cXhtl2jt7rE&md5=ebdbc213601904e85550c1388b0437abTen years left to redesign lithium-ion batteriesTurcheniuk, Kostiantyn; Bondarev, Dmitry; Singhal, Vinod; Yushin, GlebNature (London, United Kingdom) (2018), 559 (7715), 467-470CODEN: NATUAS; ISSN:0028-0836. (Nature Research)Reserves of cobalt and nickel used in elec.-vehicle cells will not meet future demand. Refocus research to find new electrodes based on common elements such as iron and silicon, urge Kostiantyn Turcheniuk and colleagues.
- 37Schmidt, M. Scarcity and Environmental Impact of Mineral Resources─An Old and Never-Ending Discussion. Resources 2019, 8 (1), 2, DOI: 10.3390/resources8010002Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 38Henckens, T. Scarce mineral resources: Extraction, consumption and limits of sustainability. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2021, 169, 105511, DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105511Google Scholar38https://chemport.cas.org/services/resolver?origin=ACS&resolution=options&coi=1%3ACAS%3A528%3ADC%252BB38XhvVCitbjF&md5=b00a47dde761b3ec50431271b50c655cScarce mineral resources: Extraction, consumption and limits of sustainabilityHenckens, TheoResources, Conservation and Recycling (2021), 169 (), 105511CODEN: RCREEW; ISSN:0921-3449. (Elsevier B.V.)The interests of the current and future generations concerning the access to and the use of geol. scarce mineral resources diverge. This article explores whether this apparent irreconcilability can be resolved. It is investigated how far the extn. rate of thirteen scarce raw materials can be reduced while simultaneously increasing the services they provide worldwide to the level prevailing in developed countries in 2020. The scarce raw materials considered are antimony, bismuth, boron, chromium, copper, gold, indium, molybdenum, nickel, silver, tin, tungsten, and zinc. Indicative ests. of how long these mineral resources will be available for humanity are calcd., assuming (1)the world population stabilizes at ten billion people, (2) the global service level of these resources attains that prevailing in developed countries in 2020 and (3) max. resource-saving measures are taken. The conclusion is that immediate implementation of the most stringent resource-saving measures could extend the estd. exhaustion periods of most of the scarcest raw materials by an av. factor of approx. four, even while simultaneously increasing the global service level of these resources by a factor four as well. Without sufficient and adequate resource saving measures it will be difficult or impossible for a substantial part of the future world population to attain the service level of mineral resources prevailing in developed countries at this moment. Moreover, without such measures, the period of time that future citizens of rich countries can continue enjoying the current service level of some of the scarcest mineral resources in their countries, will be severely limited.
- 39Sverdrup, H. U.; Olafsdottir, A. H.; Ragnarsdottir, K. V. Development of a Biophysical Economics Module for the Global Integrated Assessment Model WORLD7. In Feedback Economics: Economic Modeling with System Dynamics; Cavana, R. Y., Dangerfield, B. C., Pavlov, O. V., Radzicki, M. J., Wheat, I. D., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, 2021; pp 247– 283.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 40Nassar, N. T.; Lederer, G. W.; Brainard, J. L.; Padilla, A. J.; Lessard, J. D. Rock-to-Metal Ratio: A Foundational Metric for Understanding Mine Wastes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022, 56 (10), 6710– 6721, DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.1c07875Google Scholar40https://chemport.cas.org/services/resolver?origin=ACS&resolution=options&coi=1%3ACAS%3A528%3ADC%252BB38XhtVKnu7rE&md5=d8925e94325a3d31344e8314ea7072aaRock-to-Metal Ratio: A Foundational Metric for Understanding Mine WastesNassar, Nedal T.; Lederer, Graham W.; Brainard, Jamie L.; Padilla, Abraham J.; Lessard, Joseph D.Environmental Science & Technology (2022), 56 (10), 6710-6721CODEN: ESTHAG; ISSN:1520-5851. (American Chemical Society)The quantity of ore mined and waste rock (i.e., overburden or barren rock) removed to produce a refined unit of a mineral commodity, its rock-to-metal ratio (RMR), is an important metric for understanding mine wastes and environmental burdens. In this anal., we provide a comprehensive examn. of RMRs for 25 commodities for 2018. The results indicate significant variability across commodities. Precious metals like gold have RMRs in the range of 105-106, while iron ore and aluminum are on the order of 101. The results also indicate significant variability across operations for a single commodity. The interquartile range of RMRs for individual cobalt operations, for example, varies from 465 to 2157, with a global RMR of 859. RMR variability is mainly driven by ore grades and revenue contribution. The total attributable ore mined and waste rock removed in the prodn. of these 25 commodities sums to 37.6 billion metric tons, 83% of which is attributable to iron ore, copper, and gold. RMRs provide an addnl. dimension for evaluating the impact of materials and material choice trade-offs. The results can enhance life cycle inventories and be extended to evaluate areas of surface disturbances, mine tailings, energy requirements, and assocd. greenhouse gas emissions.
- 41Bide, T.; Brown, T. J.; Gunn, A. G.; Deady, E. Development of decision-making tools to create a harmonised UK national mineral resource inventory using the United Nations Framework Classification. Resources Polym. 2022, 76, 102558, DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102558Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 42Jorgensen, L. F.; Wittenberg, A.; Deady, E.; Kumelj, Š.; Tulstrup, J. European mineral intelligence - collecting, harmonizing and sharing data on European raw materials. Geological Society, London, Special Publications 2023, 526 (1), 51– 67, DOI: 10.1144/SP526-2022-179Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 43Graedel, T. E.; Barr, R.; Cordier, D.; Enriquez, M.; Hagelüken, C.; Hammond, N. Q.; Kesler, S.; Mudd, G.; Nassar, N.; Peacey, J.; Reck, B. K.; Robb, L.; Skinner, B. J.; Turnbull, I.; Santos, R. V.; Wall, F.; Wittmer, D. Estimating Long-Run Geological Stocks of Metals; Working Group on Geological Stocks of Metals, UNEP International Panel on Sustainable Resource Management: Paris, 2011.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 44Wellmer, F. W.; Scholz, R. W. Peak minerals: What can we learn from the history of mineral economics and the cases of gold and phosphorus?. Miner. Econ. 2017, 30 (2), 73– 93, DOI: 10.1007/s13563-016-0094-3Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 45Weber, L.; Reichl, C. Mineral statistics─useful tool or needless exercise?. Mineral economics: raw materials report 2022, 35 (3–4), 569– 586, DOI: 10.1007/s13563-022-00314-6Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 46West, J.; Lieber, M.; Lutter, S.; Schandl, H. Proposal for a new compilation system for metal ores in economy wide material flow accounting. J. Ind. Ecol. 2020, 24 (6), 1220– 1233, DOI: 10.1111/jiec.13015Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 47Northey, S. A.; Klose, S.; Pauliuk, S.; Yellishetty, M.; Giurco, D. Primary Exploration, Mining and Metal Supply Scenario (PEMMSS) model: Towards a stochastic understanding of the mineral discovery, mine development and co-product recovery requirements to meet demand in a low-carbon future. Resources, Conservation & Recycling Advances 2023, 17, 200137, DOI: 10.1016/j.rcradv.2023.200137Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 48Singer, D. A. Comparison of expert estimates of number of undiscovered mineral deposits with mineral deposit densities. Ore Geol. Rev. 2018, 99, 235– 243, DOI: 10.1016/j.oregeorev.2018.06.019Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 49Mudd, G. M.; Jowitt, S. M. The New Century for Nickel Resources, Reserves, and Mining: Reassessing the Sustainability of the Devil’s Metal. Econ. Geol. 2022, 117 (8), 1961– 1983, DOI: 10.5382/econgeo.4950Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 50Mudd, G. M.; Jowitt, S. M.; Werner, T. T. The world’s by-product and critical metal resources part I: Uncertainties, current reporting practices, implications and grounds for optimizm. Ore Geol. Rev. 2017, 86, 924– 938, DOI: 10.1016/j.oregeorev.2016.05.001Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 51Northey, S. A.; Mudd, G. M.; Werner, T. T. Unresolved Complexity in Assessments of Mineral Resource Depletion and Availability. Nat. Resour. Res. 2018, 27 (2), 241– 255, DOI: 10.1007/s11053-017-9352-5Google Scholar51https://chemport.cas.org/services/resolver?origin=ACS&resolution=options&coi=1%3ACAS%3A528%3ADC%252BC2sXht1ekt7jL&md5=c738969548b5ffa58691e6bbecf1ea0cUnresolved Complexity in Assessments of Mineral Resource Depletion and AvailabilityNorthey, Stephen A.; Mudd, Gavin M.; Werner, T. T.Natural Resources Research (Dordrecht, Netherlands) (2018), 27 (2), 241-255CODEN: NRREFQ; ISSN:1520-7439. (Springer)A review. Considerations of mineral resource availability and depletion form part of a diverse array of sustainable development-oriented studies, across domains such as resource criticality, life cycle assessment and material flow anal. Given the multidisciplinary nature of these studies, it is important that a common understanding of the complexity and nuances of mineral supply chains be developed. In this paper, we provide a brief overview of these assessment approaches and expand on several areas that are conceptually difficult to account for in these studies. These include the dynamic nature of relationships between reserves, resources, cut-off grades and ore grades; the ability to account for local economic, social and environmental factors when performing global assessments; and the role that technol. improvements play in increasing the availability of economically extractable mineral resources. Advancing knowledge in these areas may further enhance the sophistication and interpretation of studies that assess mineral resource depletion or availability.
- 52Simoni, M. U.; Aslaksen Aasly, K.; Eilu, P.; Schjødt, F. Mintell4 EU Deliverable D4.1. Case Study Review with Guidance and Examples for Applying the UNFC to European Mineral Resources; Geological Survey of Norway (NGU): Trondheim, Norway, 2021.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 53Sustainability Reporting in the Mining Sector - Current Status and Future Trends; United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP): Nairobi, Kenya, 2020.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 54Lebre, E.; Owen, J. R.; Kemp, D.; Valenta, R. K. Complex orebodies and future global metal supply: An introduction. Resour. Policy 2022, 77, 102696, DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102696Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 55Sala, S.; Ciuffo, B.; Nijkamp, P. A systemic framework for sustainability assessment. Ecological Economics 2015, 119, 314– 325, DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.09.015Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 56Gorman, M. R.; Dzombak, D. A. A review of sustainable mining and resource management: Transitioning from the life cycle of the mine to the life cycle of the mineral. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2018, 137, 281– 291, DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.06.001Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 57Schandl, H.; Müller, D. B.; Moriguchi, Y. Socioeconomic Metabolism Takes the Stage in the International Environmental Policy Debate: A Special Issue to Review Research Progress and Policy Impacts. J. Ind. Ecol. 2015, 19 (5), 689– 694, DOI: 10.1111/jiec.12357Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 58Turner, G. M.; Poldy, F. Let’s Get Physical: Creating a Stocks and Flows View of the Australian Economy. In MODSIM 2001, Canberra, Australia, 2001; pp 1637– 1642.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 59Forrester, J. W. Industrial Dynamics. A major breakthrough for decision makers. Harvard Bus. Rev. 1958, 36 (4), 37– 66Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 60Fischer-Kowalski, M. Society’s Metabolism - The Intellectual History of Materials Flow Analysis, Part I, 1860–1970. J. Ind. Ecol. 1998, 2 (1), 61– 78, DOI: 10.1162/jiec.1998.2.1.61Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 61Ayres, R. U. Industrial metabolism. In Technology and Environment, Ausubel, J. H., Sladovich, H. E., Eds. The National Academies Press: Washington, D..C., 1989; Vol. 1989, pp 23– 49.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 62Frosch, R. A.; Gallopoulos, N. E. Strategies for manufacturing. Sci. Am. 1989, 261 (3), 144– 152, DOI: 10.1038/scientificamerican0989-144Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 63Graedel, T. E.; Allenby, B. R.; Telephone, A.; Company, T. Industrial Ecology; Prentice Hall, 1995.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 64Sterman, J. D. Business Dynamics; McGraw-Hill, 2000.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 65Ghisellini, P.; Cialani, C.; Ulgiati, S. A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 114, 11– 32, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 66Haberl, H.; Wiedenhofer, D.; Pauliuk, S.; Krausmann, F.; Müller, D. B.; Fischer-Kowalski, M. Contributions of sociometabolic research to sustainability science. Nat. Sustainability 2019, 2 (3), 173– 184, DOI: 10.1038/s41893-019-0225-2Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 67Ayres, R. U.; Kneese, A. V. Production, consumption, and externalities. Am. Econ. Rev. 1969, 59 (3), 282– 297Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 68Baccini, P.; Brunner, P. H. Metabolism of the Anthroposphere; Springer: Berlin; New York, 1991.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 69Brunner, P. H.; Rechberger, H. Practical Handbook of Material Flow Analysis; CRC Press/LewisPublishers: Boca Raton, FL, 2004.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 70Brunner, P. H.; Rechberger, H. Practical Handbook of Material Flow Analysis: For Environmental, Resource, and Waste Engineers, 2nd ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, 2017.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 71Cullen, J. M.; Cooper, D. R. Material Flows and Efficiency. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 2022, 52 (1), 525– 559, DOI: 10.1146/annurev-matsci-070218-125903Google Scholar71https://chemport.cas.org/services/resolver?origin=ACS&resolution=options&coi=1%3ACAS%3A528%3ADC%252BB38Xht1Shtb3L&md5=4a8608317399d58b0c25cb2dc627d8c8Material Flows and EfficiencyCullen, Jonathan M.; Cooper, Daniel R.Annual Review of Materials Research (2022), 52 (), 525-559CODEN: ARMRCU; ISSN:1531-7331. (Annual Reviews)Attempts to track material flows and the calcn. of efficiency for material systems go hand in hand. Questions of where materials come from, where materials go to, and how much material is lost along the way are embedded in human societies. This article reviews material flows, their anal., and progress toward material efficiency. We focus first on material flow anal. (MFA) and the three key tenets of any MFA: presentation of materials, visualization of the flow structure, and insight derived from anal. Reviewing recent literature, we explore how each of these concepts is described, organized, and presented in MFA studies. We go on to show the role of MFA in material efficiency calcns. and what-if scenario anal. for informed decision-making. We investigate the origins and motivations behind the material efficiency paradigm and the key efficiency strategies and practices developed in recent years and conclude by suggesting priorities for a future research agenda.
- 72de Lavoisier, A.-L. Traité Élémentaire de Chimie; Chez Cuchet, libraire: Paris, 1789; Vol. 1.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 73Martins, R. A priori components of science: Lavoisier and the law of conservation of mass in chemical reactions. In Studies in History and Philosophy of Science II; Quamcumque Editum, 2021; pp 5– 71.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 74Hartig, G. L. Anweisung zur Taxation der Forste, oder zur Bestimmung des Holzertrags der Wälder; Heyer: Giessen, 1795.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 75Kurth, H.; Gerold, D.; Ulbricht, R. Forsteinrichtung: Nachhaltige Regelung des Waldes. DLV-Verlag: Berlin, 1994.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 76Müller, D. B.; Bader, H.-P.; Baccini, P. Long-term Coordination of Timber Production and Consumption Using a Dynamic Material and Energy Flow Analysis. J. Ind. Ecol. 2004, 8 (3), 65– 88, DOI: 10.1162/1088198042442342Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 77Anonymous. Mass-Balance Terms. J. Glaciol. 1969, 8 (52), 3– 7. DOI: 10.3189/S0022143000020736Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 78Cogley, J. G. Mass-balance terms revisited. J. Glaciol. 2010, 56 (200), 997– 1001, DOI: 10.3189/002214311796406040Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 79Mellor, M. Mass balance studies in Antarctica. J. Glaciol. 1959, 3 (26), 522– 533, DOI: 10.3189/S0022143000017275Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 80Korzoun, V. I. World Water Balance and Water Resources of the Earth; USSR Committee for the International Hydrological Decade: Paris, 1978.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 81Aeschbach-Hertig, W.; Gleeson, T. Regional strategies for the accelerating global problem of groundwater depletion. Nat. Geosci. 2012, 5 (12), 853– 861, DOI: 10.1038/ngeo1617Google Scholar81https://chemport.cas.org/services/resolver?origin=ACS&resolution=options&coi=1%3ACAS%3A528%3ADC%252BC38Xhs1ymt7zO&md5=08d8faae9b2eb73c70bb67155645c3f4Regional strategies for the accelerating global problem of groundwater depletionAeschbach-Hertig, Werner; Gleeson, TomNature Geoscience (2012), 5 (12), 853-861CODEN: NGAEBU; ISSN:1752-0894. (Nature Publishing Group)Groundwater-the world's largest freshwater resource-is critically important for irrigated agriculture and hence for global food security. Yet depletion is widespread in large groundwater systems in both semi-arid and humid regions of the world. Excessive extn. for irrigation where groundwater is slowly renewed is the main cause of the depletion, and climate change has the potential to exacerbate the problem in some regions. Globally aggregated groundwater depletion contributes to sea-level rise, and has accelerated markedly since the mid-twentieth century. But its impacts on water resources are more obvious at the regional scale, for example in agriculturally important parts of India, China and the United States. Food prodn. in such regions can only be made sustainable in the long term if groundwater levels are stabilized. To this end, a transformation is required in how we value, manage and characterize groundwater systems. Tech. approaches-such as water diversion, artificial groundwater recharge and efficient irrigation-have failed to balance regional groundwater budgets. They need to be complemented by more comprehensive strategies that are adapted to the specific social, economic, political and environmental settings of each region.
- 82Peters-Lidard, C. D.; Hossain, F.; Leung, L. R.; McDowell, N.; Rodell, M.; Tapiador, F. J.; Turk, F. J.; Wood, A. 100 Years of Progress in Hydrology. Meteorological Monographs 2018, 59, 25.1– 25.51, DOI: 10.1175/AMSMONOGRAPHS-D-18-0019.1Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 83Le Quéré, C.; Andrew, R. M.; Canadell, J. G.; Sitch, S.; Korsbakken, J. I.; Peters, G. P.; Manning, A. C.; Boden, T. A.; Tans, P. P.; Houghton, R. A.; Keeling, R. F.; Alin, S.; Andrews, O. D.; Anthoni, P.; Barbero, L.; Bopp, L.; Chevallier, F.; Chini, L. P.; Ciais, P.; Currie, K.; Delire, C.; Doney, S. C.; Friedlingstein, P.; Gkritzalis, T.; Harris, I.; Hauck, J.; Haverd, V.; Hoppema, M.; Klein Goldewijk, K.; Jain, A. K.; Kato, E.; Körtzinger, A.; Landschützer, P.; Lefèvre, N.; Lenton, A.; Lienert, S.; Lombardozzi, D.; Melton, J. R.; Metzl, N.; Millero, F.; Monteiro, P. M. S.; Munro, D. R.; Nabel, J. E. M. S.; Nakaoka, S.; O’Brien, K.; Olsen, A.; Omar, A. M.; Ono, T.; Pierrot, D.; Poulter, B.; Rödenbeck, C.; Salisbury, J.; Schuster, U.; Schwinger, J.; Séférian, R.; Skjelvan, I.; Stocker, B. D.; Sutton, A. J.; Takahashi, T.; Tian, H.; Tilbrook, B.; van der Laan-Luijkx, I. T.; van der Werf, G. R.; Viovy, N.; Walker, A. P.; Wiltshire, A. J.; Zaehle, S. Global Carbon Budget 2016. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 2016, 8 (2), 605– 649, DOI: 10.5194/essd-8-605-2016Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 84Wiese, D. N.; Bienstock, B.; Blackwood, C.; Chrone, J.; Loomis, B. D.; Sauber, J.; Rodell, M.; Baize, R.; Bearden, D.; Case, K.; Horner, S.; Luthcke, S.; Reager, J. T.; Srinivasan, M.; Tsaoussi, L.; Webb, F.; Whitehurst, A.; Zlotnicki, V. The Mass Change Designated Observable Study: Overview and Results. Earth Space Sci. 2022, 9 (8), e2022EA002311 DOI: 10.1029/2022EA002311Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 85Lyell, C. Principles of Geology: Being an Inquiry how Far the Former Changes of the Earth’s Surface are Referable to Causes Now in Operation; John Murray: London, 1830; Vol. 1.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 86Rudwick, M. J. S. The Strategy of Lyell’s Principles of Geology. Isis 1970, 61 (1), 5– 33, DOI: 10.1086/350576Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 87Syvitski, J.; Ángel, J. R.; Saito, Y.; Overeem, I.; Vörösmarty, C. J.; Wang, H.; Olago, D. Earth’s sediment cycle during the Anthropocene. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 2022, 3 (3), 179– 196, DOI: 10.1038/s43017-021-00253-wGoogle ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 88Odeh, A. S. Reservoir Simulation···What Is It. J. Pet. Technol. 1969, 21 (11), 1383– 1388, DOI: 10.2118/2790-PAGoogle ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 89Magoon, L. B.; Dow, W. G. The Petroleum System─From Source to Trap. AAPG Memoir 1994, 60, 3– 24, DOI: 10.1306/M60585C1Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 90Wiegel, R. L. Advances in mineral processing material balances. Can. Metall. Q. 1972, 11 (2), 413– 424, DOI: 10.1179/cmq.1972.11.2.413Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 91Hodouin, D. Methods for automatic control, observation, and optimization in mineral processing plants. Journal of Process Control 2011, 21 (2), 211– 225, DOI: 10.1016/j.jprocont.2010.10.016Google Scholar91https://chemport.cas.org/services/resolver?origin=ACS&resolution=options&coi=1%3ACAS%3A528%3ADC%252BC3MXitFejs7w%253D&md5=8eb0815de1c4bbe89e98ae2595408d4fMethods for automatic control, observation, and optimization in mineral processing plantsHodouin, DanielJournal of Process Control (2011), 21 (2), 211-225CODEN: JPCOEO; ISSN:0959-1524. (Elsevier Ltd.)For controlling strongly disturbed, poorly modeled, and difficult to measure processes, such as those involved in the mineral processing industry, the peripheral tools of the control loop (fault detection and isolation system, data reconciliation procedure, observers, soft sensors, optimizers, model parameter tuners) are as important as the controller itself. The paper briefly describes each element of this generalized control loop, while putting emphasis on mineral processing specific cases.
- 92Wolman, A. The Metabolism of Cities. Sci. Am. 1965, 213 (3), 178– 193, DOI: 10.1038/scientificamerican0965-178Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 93Kennedy, C.; Pincetl, S.; Bunje, P. The study of urban metabolism and its applications to urban planning and design. Environ. Pollut. 2011, 159 (8), 1965– 1973, DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2010.10.022Google Scholar93https://chemport.cas.org/services/resolver?origin=ACS&resolution=options&coi=1%3ACAS%3A528%3ADC%252BC3MXnsVyluro%253D&md5=665b415812f4eb17ade33aabf729ab72The study of urban metabolism and its applications to urban planning and designKennedy, C.; Pincetl, S.; Bunje, P.Environmental Pollution (Oxford, United Kingdom) (2011), 159 (8-9), 1965-1973CODEN: ENPOEK; ISSN:0269-7491. (Elsevier Ltd.)Following formative work in the 1970s, disappearance in the 1980s, and reemergence in the 1990s, a chronol. review shows that the past decade has witnessed increasing interest in the study of urban metab. The review finds that there are two related, non-conflicting, schools of urban metab.: one following Odum describes metab. in terms of energy equiv.; while the second more broadly expresses a city's flows of water, materials and nutrients in terms of mass fluxes. Four example applications of urban metab. studies are discussed: urban sustainability indicators; inputs to urban greenhouse gas emissions calcn.; math. models of urban metab. for policy anal.; and as a basis for sustainable urban design. Future directions include fuller integration of social, health and economic indicators into the urban metab. framework, while tackling the great sustainability challenge of reconstructing cities. This paper presents a chronol. review of urban metab. studies and highlights four areas of application.
- 94Müller, D. B.; Billy, R.; Simoni, M. U.; Petavratzi, E.; Liu, G.; Rechberger, H.; Lundhaug, M. C.; Cullen, J. M. Maps of the physical economy to inform sustainability strategies. In Handbook of Recycling, 2nd ed.; Meskers, C., Worrell, E., Reuter, M. A., Eds.; Elsevier: Waltham, USA, 2023; pp 1– 18.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 95Gonzalez Hernandez, A.; Lupton, R. C.; Williams, C.; Cullen, J. M. Control data, Sankey diagrams, and exergy: Assessing the resource efficiency of industrial plants. Appl. Energy 2018, 218, 232– 245, DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.02.181Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 96Lupton, R. C.; Allwood, J. M. Hybrid Sankey diagrams: Visual analysis of multidimensional data for understanding resource use. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2017, 124, 141– 151, DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.05.002Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 97Billy, R. G.; Monnier, L.; Nybakke, E.; Isaksen, M.; Müller, D. B. Systemic Approaches for Emission Reduction in Industrial Plants Based on Physical Accounting: Example for an Aluminum Smelter. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022, 56 (3), 1973– 1982, DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.1c05681Google Scholar97https://chemport.cas.org/services/resolver?origin=ACS&resolution=options&coi=1%3ACAS%3A528%3ADC%252BB38Xht1yrurc%253D&md5=e36ae5938e45e6c229cc335548e3130cSystemic Approaches for Emission Reduction in Industrial Plants Based on Physical Accounting: Example for an Aluminum SmelterBilly, Romain G.; Monnier, Louis; Nybakke, Even; Isaksen, Morten; Muller, Daniel B.Environmental Science & Technology (2022), 56 (3), 1973-1982CODEN: ESTHAG; ISSN:1520-5851. (American Chemical Society)Greenhouse gas (GHG) accounting in industrial plants usually has multiple purposes, including mandatory reporting, shareholder and stakeholder communication, developing key performance indicators (KPIs), or informing cost-effective mitigation options. Current carbon accounting systems, such as the one required by the European Union Emission Trading Scheme (EU ETS), ignore the system context in which emissions occur. This hampers the identification and evaluation of comprehensive mitigation strategies considering linkages between materials, energy, and emissions. Here, we propose a carbon accounting method based on multilevel material flow anal. (MFA), which aims at addressing this gap. Using a Norwegian primary aluminum prodn. plant as an example, we analyzed the material stocks and flows within this plant for total mass flows of goods as well as substances such as aluminum and carbon. The results show that the MFA-based accounting (i) is more robust than conventional tools due to mass balance consistency and higher granularity, (ii) allows monitoring the performance of the company and defines meaningful KPIs, (iii) can be used as a basis for the EU ETS reporting and linked to internal reporting, (iv) enables the identification and evaluation of systemic solns. and resource efficiency strategies for reducing emissions, and (v) has the potential to save costs.
- 98IAI. The Global Aluminium Cycle - Aluminium Stocks and Flows Visualization, 2023. https://alucycle.international-aluminium.org/. (accessed 14.08.2023).Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 99Torres De Matos, C.; Wittmer, D.; Mathieux, F.; Pennington, D. Revision of the Material System Analyses Specifications; JRC118827; European Commission: Luxembourg, 2020. DOI: 10.2760/374178 .Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 100Padilla, A. J.; Nassar, N. T. Dynamic material flow analysis of tantalum in the United States from 2002 to 2020. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2023, 190, 106783, DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106783Google Scholar100https://chemport.cas.org/services/resolver?origin=ACS&resolution=options&coi=1%3ACAS%3A528%3ADC%252BB38XivFOrsL3K&md5=2fe96d350dd254f51a85494d1d1112e0Dynamic material flow analysis of tantalum in the United States from 2002 to 2020Padilla, Abraham J.; Nassar, Nedal T.Resources, Conservation and Recycling (2023), 190 (), 106783CODEN: RCREEW; ISSN:0921-3449. (Elsevier B.V.)Tantalum has received considerable attention due to risks assocd. with its supply chain. In 2020 ∼70% of global tantalum supply originated in Africa, with 40% produced in the Democratic Republic of Congo alone. The United States has relied entirely on imports since the 1950s. However, quantifying total domestic consumption is problematic because refined tantalum compds. do not have unique tariff codes resulting in significant trade vols. not properly documented. Furthermore, tantalum incorporated into finished goods is not tracked as tantalum. Thus, ests. only capture a fraction of total consumption. We performed a material flow anal. to quantify total domestic tantalum consumption from 2002 to 2020. Our results indicate that consumption may be up to 250% more than previously estd. Our detailed results allow quantification of tantalum stocks in-use as well as coming out of use any year, providing valuable insight to industry and policymakers for addressing potential supply security issues.
- 101McCaffrey, D. M.; Nassar, N. T.; Jowitt, S. M.; Padilla, A. J.; Bird, L. R. Embedded critical material flow: The case of niobium, the United States, and China. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2023, 188, 106698, DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106698Google Scholar101https://chemport.cas.org/services/resolver?origin=ACS&resolution=options&coi=1%3ACAS%3A528%3ADC%252BB38Xis1Gltr3E&md5=736c86e708918c37676bd5b6e8e82029Embedded critical material flow: The case of niobium, the United States, and ChinaMcCaffrey, Dalton M.; Nassar, Nedal T.; Jowitt, Simon M.; Padilla, Abraham J.; Bird, Laurence R.Resources, Conservation and Recycling (2023), 188 (), 106698CODEN: RCREEW; ISSN:0921-3449. (Elsevier B.V.)Niobium, often classified as crit., is typically embedded within steels essential for infrastructure and transportation. Most niobium-consuming countries are import-dependent on primary stage niobium, meaning traditional material flow anal., which often excludes crit. commodities embedded within products of large-scale industries, would miss important flows in the fabrication and manufg. stages and underestimate niobium consumption. This study presents the first dynamic (2000-2020) niobium flow anal. for two niobium-consuming, net import-dependent countries: the United States (U.S.) and China. Results demonstrate that the U. S. is import-dependent throughout all stages of the niobium flow cycle including embedded and primary flows, whereas China is only import-dependent on primary niobium. Moreover, while most U. S. imports of niobium embedded within (semi-)finished goods are consumed domestically, most niobium-contg. goods manufd. in China are exported, suggesting a supply disruption would affect their economies differently. This research demonstrates the necessity of embedded flows for criticality assessments and evaluating supply restrictions.
- 102Alonso, E.; Pineault, D. G.; Gambogi, J.; Nassar, N. T. Mapping first to final uses for rare earth elements, globally and in the United States. J. Ind. Ecol. 2023, 27 (1), 312– 322, DOI: 10.1111/jiec.13354Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 103Petavratzi, E.; Gunn, G. Decarbonising the automotive sector: a primary raw material perspective on targets and timescales. Miner. Econ. 2023. 36 545 DOI: 10.1007/s13563-022-00334-2Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 104McKelvey, V. E. Mineral Resource Estimates and Public Policy: Better methods for estimating the magnitude of potential mineral resources are needed to provide the knowledge that should guide the design of many key public policies. Am. Sci. 1972, 60 (1), 32– 40Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 105Skinner, B. J. Earth resources. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1979, 76 (9), 4212– 4217, DOI: 10.1073/pnas.76.9.4212Google Scholar105https://chemport.cas.org/services/resolver?origin=ACS&resolution=options&coi=1%3ACAS%3A528%3ADyaE1MXmtFertLk%253D&md5=deef0196ed13ab028e3727795a109ef9Earth resourcesSkinner, Brian J.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (1979), 76 (9), 4212-17CODEN: PNASA6; ISSN:0027-8424.A review with 11 refs.
- 106Kesler, S. E. Geological Stocks and Prospects for Nonrenewable Resources. In Linkages of Sustainability; Graedel, T. E.; van der Voet, E., Eds. The MIT Press: Cambridge, Mass., 2009.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 107NEA, IAEA. Uranium 2020: Resources, Production and Demand; NEA No. 7413; OECD Publishing: Paris, 2021. DOI: 10.1787/d82388ab-en .Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 108Arndt, N. T.; Fontboté, L.; Hedenquist, J. W.; Kesler, S. E.; Thompson, J. F. H.; Wood, D. G. Metals and Minerals, Now and in The Future. Geochem. Perspect. 2017, 6 (1), 3– 17Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 109West, J. Extractable global resources and the future availability of metal stocks: “Known Unknowns” for the foreseeable future. Resour. Policy 2020, 65, 101574, DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.101574Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 110Andrews, G. C.; Shaw, P.; McPhee, J. Canadian Professional Engineering and Geoscience: Practice and Ethics, 6 ed.; Nelson: Toronto, 2019.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 111Meinert, L. D.; Robinson, G. R., Jr; Nassar, N. T. Mineral resources: Reserves, peak production and the future. Resources 2016, 5 (1), 14, DOI: 10.3390/resources5010014Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 112International Reporting Template for the Public Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves; Committee for Mineral Reserves International Reporting Standards (CRIRSCO) and International Council on Mining & Metals (ICMM): London, 2013.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 113Guidance Note on Competency Requirements for the Estimation, Classification and Management of Resources; ECE/ENERGY/GE.3/2022/4; United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, 2022.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 114IFRS. Extractive Activities - Reserve and Resource Reporting; International Accounting Standards Board (IASB), 2020.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 115Mineral Commodity Summaries 2019 - Appendix C - Reserves and Resources; U.S. Geological Survey: Reston, VA, 2023. DOI: 10.3133/mcs2023 .Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 116UNECE. United Nations Framework Classification for Resources Update 2019; ECE/ENERGY/125; United Nations Economic Commission for Europe: Geneva, Switzerland, 2019.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 117Volchko, Y.; Norrman, J.; Ericsson, L. O.; Nilsson, K. L.; Markstedt, A.; Öberg, M.; Mossmark, F.; Bobylev, N.; Tengborg, P. Subsurface planning: Towards a common understanding of the subsurface as a multifunctional resource. Land Use Policy 2020, 90, 104316, DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104316Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 118Faber, M.; Frank, K.; Klauer, B.; Manstetten, R.; Schiller, J.; Wissel, C. On the foundation of a general theory of stocks. Ecological Economics 2005, 55 (2), 155– 172, DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.06.006Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 119Pauliuk, S.; Majeau-Bettez, G.; Müller, D. B.; Hertwich, E. G. Toward a Practical Ontology for Socioeconomic Metabolism. J. Ind. Ecol. 2016, 20 (6), 1260– 1272, DOI: 10.1111/jiec.12386Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 120USGS. NADM Conceptual Model 1.0 - A Conceptual Model for Geologic Map Information; 2004–1334; U.S. Geological Survey: Reston, VA, 2004. DOI: 10.3133/ofr20041334 .Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 121Cohen, D. Earth’s natural wealth: an audit. New Scientist 2007, 194, 34– 41, 23 May 2007 DOI: 10.1016/S0262-4079(07)61315-3Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 122Zimmermann, E. W. World Resources and Industries: A Functional Appraisal of the Availability of Agricultural and Industrial Materials, revised ed.; Harper & Row: New York, 1951.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 123Mudd, G. M. Assessing the Availability of Global Metals and Minerals for the Sustainable Century: From Aluminium to Zirconium. Sustainability 2021, 13 (19), 10855, DOI: 10.3390/su131910855Google Scholar123https://chemport.cas.org/services/resolver?origin=ACS&resolution=options&coi=1%3ACAS%3A528%3ADC%252BB3MXis1ajsbrN&md5=5b93e73a2c12bb6e7ac80a9069c031a0Assessing the Availability of Global Metals and Minerals for the Sustainable Century: From Aluminium to ZirconiumMudd, Gavin M.Sustainability (2021), 13 (19), 10855CODEN: SUSTDE; ISSN:2071-1050. (MDPI AG)Mining supplies metals and minerals to meet the material and energy needs of the modern world. Typically, mineral resources are widely considered to be 'finite' in nature, yet, paradoxically, global prodn. and reported reserves and resources continue to grow. This paper synthesizes an extensive array of data on the long-term trends in cumulative mine prodn., reserves and resources at a global level as well detailed case studies of Australia, a global leader in many sectors of mining, and lithium, a new metal with rapidly growing demand. Overall, the paper shows that growing mine prodn. has been clearly matched by growing reserves and resources, although there are numerous complex social, environmental and governance factors which are already affecting mines and are expected to increasingly affect mining into the future. Thus it is not possible at present to det. the 'ultimately recoverable resource', esp. as this is a dynamic quantity dependent on a variety of inter-related factors (e.g., exploration, social issues, technol., market dynamics, environmental risks, governance aspects, etc.). This finding reinforces the need for continuing detailed studies of all metals and minerals to understand their individual supply and use dynamics to help modern society meet its needs and sustainable development goals.
- 124Zeng, X. Win-Win: Anthropogenic circularity for metal criticality and carbon neutrality. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering 2023, 17 (2), 23, DOI: 10.1007/s11783-023-1623-2Google Scholar124https://chemport.cas.org/services/resolver?origin=ACS&resolution=options&coi=1%3ACAS%3A280%3ADC%252BB287ntVWitg%253D%253D&md5=95e867cceba8585b8a9a2db7a2a9b8e7Win-Win: Anthropogenic circularity for metal criticality and carbon neutralityZeng XianlaiFrontiers of environmental science & engineering (2023), 17 (2), 23 ISSN:2095-2201.Resource depletion and environmental degradation have fueled a burgeoning discipline of anthropogenic circularity since the 2010s. It generally consists of waste reuse, remanufacturing, recycling, and recovery. Circular economy and "zero-waste" cities are sweeping the globe in their current practices to address the world's grand concerns linked to resources, the environment, and industry. Meanwhile, metal criticality and carbon neutrality, which have become increasingly popular in recent years, denote the material's feature and state, respectively. The goal of this article is to determine how circularity, criticality, and neutrality are related. Upscale anthropogenic circularity has the potential to expand the metal supply and, as a result, reduce metal criticality. China barely accomplished 15 % of its potential emission reduction by recycling iron, copper, and aluminum. Anthropogenic circularity has a lot of room to achieve a win-win objective, which is to reduce metal criticality while also achieving carbon neutrality in a near closed-loop cycle. Major barriers or challenges for conducting anthropogenic circularity are deriving from the inadequacy of life-cycle insight governance and the emergence of anthropogenic circularity discipline. Material flow analysis and life cycle assessment are the central methodologies to identify the hidden problems. Mineral processing and smelting, as well as end-of-life management, are indicated as critical priority areas for enhancing anthropogenic circularity. Electronic Supplementary Material: Supplementary material is available in the online version of this article at 10.1007/s11783-023-1623-2 and is accessible for authorized users.
- 125Ray, G. F. Mineral reserves: Projected lifetimes and security of supply. Resour. Policy 1984, 10 (2), 75– 80, DOI: 10.1016/0301-4207(84)90016-3Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 126Mudd, G. M.; Jowitt, S. M. Growing Global Copper Resources, Reserves and Production: Discovery Is Not the Only Control on Supply. Econ. Geol. 2018, 113 (6), 1235– 1267, DOI: 10.5382/econgeo.2018.4590Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 127Ericsson, M.; Drielsma, J.; Humphreys, D.; Storm, P.; Weihed, P. Why current assessments of ‘future efforts’ are no basis for establishing policies on material use─a response to research on ore grades. Miner. Econ. 2019, 32 (1), 111– 121, DOI: 10.1007/s13563-019-00175-6Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 128Skinner, B. J. Exploring the resource base. In Resources for the Future (RFF) Workshop on “The Long-Run Availability of Minerals”; Resources for the Future (RFF) and the Mining, Minerals and Sustainable Development Project (MMSD): Washington, D.C., 2001; p 25.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 129Skinner, B. J. A Second Iron Age Ahead? The distribution of chemical elements in the earth’s crust sets natural limits to man’s supply of metals that are much more important to the future of society than limits on energy. Am. Sci. 1976, 64 (3), 258– 269Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 130Arndt, N.; Fontboté, L.; Hedenquist, J.; Kesler, S.; Thompson, J.; Wood, D. Future Global Mineral Resources. Geochem. Perspect. 2017, 6 (1), 1– 171, DOI: 10.7185/geochempersp.6.1Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 131United States Bureau of Mines. Dictionary of Mining, Mineral, and Related Terms, 2nd ed.; American Geological Institute: Alexandria, VA, 1997.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 132Jowitt, S. M.; Mudd, G. M.; Thompson, J. F. H. Future availability of non-renewable metal resources and the influence of environmental, social, and governance conflicts on metal production. Commun. Earth Environ. 2020, 1 (1), 13, DOI: 10.1038/s43247-020-0011-0Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 133Benndorf, J. A Closed-Loop Approach for Mineral Resource Extraction. In Closed Loop Management in Mineral Resource Extraction: Turning Online Geo-Data into Mining Intelligence; Springer International Publishing: Cham, 2020; pp 5– 17.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 134Ghorbani, Y.; Nwaila, G. T.; Chirisa, M. Systematic Framework toward a Highly Reliable Approach in Metal Accounting. Miner. Process. Extr. Metall. Rev. 2022, 43 (5), 664– 678, DOI: 10.1080/08827508.2020.1784164Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 135Emery, X.; Ortiz, J. M.; Rodríguez, J. J. Quantifying Uncertainty in Mineral Resources by Use of Classification Schemes and Conditional Simulations. Math. Geol. 2006, 38 (4), 445– 464, DOI: 10.1007/s11004-005-9021-9Google Scholar135https://chemport.cas.org/services/resolver?origin=ACS&resolution=options&coi=1%3ACAS%3A528%3ADC%252BD28XhtlWmu7jK&md5=645a435dd40b18d683033a5ecce79bacQuantifying uncertainty in mineral resources by use of classification schemes and conditional simulationsEmery, Xavier; Ortiz, Julian M.; Rodriguez, Juan J.Mathematical Geology (2006), 38 (4), 445-464CODEN: MATGED; ISSN:0882-8121. (Springer)Mineral inventory detn. consists of estg. the amt. of mineral resources on a block-by-block basis and classifying individual blocks into categories with increasing level of geol. confidence. Such classification is a crucial issue for mining companies, investors, financial institutions, and authorities, but it remains subject to some confusion because of the wide variations in methodologies and the lack of standardized procedures. The first part of this paper considers some of the criteria used to classify resources in practice and their impact through a sensitivity study using data from a Chilean porphyry copper ore deposit. Five classification criteria are compared and evaluated, namely: Search neighborhoods, abs. and relative kriging variances, abs. and relative conditional simulation variances. It is shown that some classification criteria either favor or penalize the high-grade areas if the grade distribution presents a proportional effect. In the second part of the paper, conditional simulations are used to quantify the uncertainty on the overall mineral resources. This approach is promising for risk anal. and decision-making. Unlike linear kriging, simulations allow inclusion of a cutoff grade in the calcn. of the resources and also provide measures of their joint uncertainty over prodn. vols.
- 136Sonderegger, T.; Berger, M.; Alvarenga, R.; Bach, V.; Cimprich, A.; Dewulf, J.; Frischknecht, R.; Guinée, J.; Helbig, C.; Huppertz, T.; Jolliet, O.; Motoshita, M.; Northey, S.; Rugani, B.; Schrijvers, D.; Schulze, R.; Sonnemann, G.; Valero, A.; Weidema, B. P.; Young, S. B. Mineral resources in life cycle impact assessment─part I: a critical review of existing methods. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2020, 25 (4), 784– 797, DOI: 10.1007/s11367-020-01736-6Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 137Whiting, T. H.; Schodde, R. C. Why do brownfields exploration? In International Mine Management 2006; Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy: Melbourne, 2006; pp 41– 50.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 138Solow, R. M. Resources and Economic Growth. American Economist 1978, 22 (2), 5– 11, DOI: 10.1177/056943457802200201Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 139Tilton, J. E. The Hubbert peak model and assessing the threat of mineral depletion. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2018, 139, 280– 286, DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.08.026Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 140Reichstein, M.; Camps-Valls, G.; Stevens, B.; Jung, M.; Denzler, J.; Carvalhais, N.; Prabhat Deep learning and process understanding for data-driven Earth system science. Nature 2019, 566 (7743), 195– 204, DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-0912-1Google Scholar140https://chemport.cas.org/services/resolver?origin=ACS&resolution=options&coi=1%3ACAS%3A528%3ADC%252BC1MXnsVCjtrw%253D&md5=a146b45ed377bb868cdf25bd272e2006Deep learning and process understanding for data-driven Earth system scienceReichstein, Markus; Camps-Valls, Gustau; Stevens, Bjorn; Jung, Martin; Denzler, Joachim; Carvalhais, Nuno; PrabhatNature (London, United Kingdom) (2019), 566 (7743), 195-204CODEN: NATUAS; ISSN:0028-0836. (Nature Research)Machine learning approaches are increasingly used to ext. patterns and insights from the ever-increasing stream of geospatial data, but current approaches may not be optimal when system behavior is dominated by spatial or temporal context. Here, rather than amending classical machine learning, we argue that these contextual cues should be used as part of deep learning (an approach that is able to ext. spatio-temporal features automatically) to gain further process understanding of Earth system science problems, improving the predictive ability of seasonal forecasting and modeling of long-range spatial connections across multiple timescales, for example. The next step will be a hybrid modeling approach, coupling phys. process models with the versatility of data-driven machine learning.
- 141Steffen, W.; Richardson, K.; Rockström, J.; Schellnhuber, H. J.; Dube, O. P.; Dutreuil, S.; Lenton, T. M.; Lubchenco, J. The emergence and evolution of Earth System Science. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 2020, 1 (1), 54– 63, DOI: 10.1038/s43017-019-0005-6Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 142Prior, T.; Giurco, D.; Mudd, G.; Mason, L.; Behrisch, J. Resource depletion, peak minerals and the implications for sustainable resource management. Global Environ. Change 2012, 22 (3), 577– 587, DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.08.009Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 143Dewulf, J.; Hellweg, S.; Pfister, S.; León, M. F. G.; Sonderegger, T.; de Matos, C. T.; Blengini, G. A.; Mathieux, F. Towards sustainable resource management: identification and quantification of human actions that compromise the accessibility of metal resources. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2021, 167, 105403, DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105403Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 144Tanzer, J.; Rechberger, H. Setting the Common Ground: A Generic Framework for Material Flow Analysis of Complex Systems. Recycling 2019, 4 (2), 23, DOI: 10.3390/recycling4020023Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 145United Nations; European Commission; Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations; International Monetary Fund; Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development; World Bank. System of Environmental-Economic Accounting 2012: Central Framework; United Nations: Washington, 2014. DOI: 10.5089/9789211615630.069 .Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 146Sonesson, C.; Davidson, G.; Sachs, L. Mapping Mining to the Sustainable Development Goals: An Atlas; Geneva, Switzerland, 2016.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 147Mining and the SDGs: A 2020 Status Update; RMF, CCS: Nyon, Switzerland, 2020. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3726386 .Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 148RMI Report 2022 - Summary; Responsible Mining Foundation (RMF): Ontwerp, NL, 2022.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 149Steiner, G.; Geissler, B.; Watson, I.; Mew, M. C. Efficiency developments in phosphate rock mining over the last three decades. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2015, 105, 235– 245, DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.10.004Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 150Lèbre, C.; Owen, J. R.; Corder, G. D.; Kemp, D.; Stringer, M.; Valenta, R. K. Source Risks As Constraints to Future Metal Supply. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 53 (18), 10571– 10579, DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.9b02808Google Scholar150https://chemport.cas.org/services/resolver?origin=ACS&resolution=options&coi=1%3ACAS%3A528%3ADC%252BC1MXhs1Wjt7fP&md5=a146471958a2b65f06fde3be244d33bbSource Risks As Constraints to Future Metal SupplyLebre, Eleonore; Owen, John R.; Corder, Glen D.; Kemp, Deanna; Stringer, Martin; Valenta, Rick K.Environmental Science & Technology (2019), 53 (18), 10571-10579CODEN: ESTHAG; ISSN:0013-936X. (American Chemical Society)Rising consumer demand is driving concerns around the "availability" and "criticality" of metals. Methodologies have emerged to assess the risks related to global metal supply. None have specifically examd. the initial supply source: the mine site where primary ore is extd. Environmental, social, and governance ("ESG") risks are crit. to the development of new mining projects and the conversion of resources to mine prodn. In this paper, we offer a methodol. that assesses the inherent complexities surrounding extractives projects. It includes eight ESG risk categories that overlay the locations of undeveloped iron, copper, and aluminum orebodies that will be crit. to future supply. The percentage of global reserves and resources that are located in complex ESG contexts (i.e., with four or more concurrent medium-to-high risks) is 47% for iron, 63% for copper, and 88% for aluminum. This work contributes to research by providing a more complete understanding of source level constraints and risks to supply.
- 151Mine-Site Study 2019: Mine-Site ESG Data Disclosure by Small and Mid-Tier Mining Companies; Responsible Mining Foundation (RMF): Antwerp, NL, 2019.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 152McLellan, B. C.; Corder, G. D. Risk reduction through early assessment and integration of sustainability in design in the minerals industry. J. Clean. Prod. 2013, 53 (0), 37– 46, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.02.014Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 153Noble, A. C. Mineral resource estimation. In SME Mining Engineering Handbook, 3rd ed.; Darling, P., Ed.; Society for Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration: Englewood, CO, 2011; pp 203– 217.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 154Pell, R.; Tijsseling, L.; Palmer, L. W.; Glass, H. J.; Yan, X.; Wall, F.; Zeng, X.; Li, J. Environmental optimization of mine scheduling through life cycle assessment integration. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2019, 142, 267– 276, DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.11.022Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 155Hustrulid, W. A.; Kuchta, M.; Martin, R. K. Open Pit Mine Planning and Design. 3rd ed.; CRC Press: London, 2013.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 156Mineral Resource Governance in the 21st Century: Gearing Extractive Industries Towards Sustainable Development; International Resource Panel, United Nations Environment Programme: Nairobi, Kenya, 2020.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 157Dehaine, Q.; Tijsseling, L. T.; Glass, H. J.; Törmänen, T.; Butcher, A. R. Geometallurgy of cobalt ores: A review. Miner. Eng. 2021, 160, 106656, DOI: 10.1016/j.mineng.2020.106656Google Scholar157https://chemport.cas.org/services/resolver?origin=ACS&resolution=options&coi=1%3ACAS%3A528%3ADC%252BB3cXisVyitrfE&md5=4674b3cec5097ced4890ebf81aeb50a2Geometallurgy of cobalt ores: A reviewDehaine, Quentin; Tijsseling, Laurens T.; Glass, Hylke J.; Tormanen, Tuomo; Butcher, Alan R.Minerals Engineering (2021), 160 (), 106656CODEN: MENGEB; ISSN:0892-6875. (Elsevier Ltd.)A review. Cobalt (Co) is a transition metal featuring unique phys. properties which makes its use crit. for many high-tech applications such as high strength materials, magnets and most importantly, rechargeable batteries. The bulk of world cobalt output usually arises as a byproduct of extg. other metals, mostly nickel (Ni) and copper (Cu), from a wide variety of deposit types mostly Cu-Co sediment-hosted deposits, but also Ni-Co laterites, Ni-Cu-Co sulfides or hydrothermal and volcanogenic deposits. Significant differences in ore properties (geochem., mineralogy, alteration and phys. properties) exist between cobalt-contg. deposits, as well as within a single deposit, which can host a range of ore types. Variability of cobalt ores makes it challenging to develop a single extn. or treatment process that will be able to accommodate all geometallurgical variation. Overall, there is a lack of fundamental knowledge on cobalt minerals and their processability. The recovery efficiency for cobalt is generally low, in particular for processes involving flotation and smelting, leading to significant cobalt losses to mine tailings or smelter slags. This paper starts by reviewing the main geometallurgical properties of cobalt ores, with a particular focus on ore mineralogy which exerts a significant control over ore processing behavior and cobalt extn., such as the oxidn. state, i.e. oxide or sulfides which drives the selection of the processing route (leaching vs flotation), and the assocd. gangue mineralogy, which can affect acid consumption during leaching or flotation performance. The main processing routes and assocd. specific geometallurgical aspects of each deposit type are presented. The paper concludes on the future cobalt prospects, in terms of primary and secondary resources, cobalt processing and sustainable cobalt sourcing for which further research is needed.
- 158Bide, T.; Horvath, Z.; Brown, T.; Idoine, N.; Lauko, A.; Sores, L.; Petavratzi, E.; McGrath, E.; Bavec, S.; Rokavec, D.; Eloranta, T.; Aasly, K. ORAMA Project Deliverable 1.2. Final Analysis and Recommendations for the Improvement of Statistical Data Collection Methods in Europe for Primary Raw Materials; Brussels, 2018.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 159Current Non-Financial Reporting Formats and Practices; European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG): Brussels, Belgium, 2021.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 160Minerals and Economic Development. In Breaking New Ground: Mining, Minerals and Sustainable Development; Mining, Minerals and Sustainable Development; International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED): London, 2002; pp 172– 196.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 161Torres, A.; Simoni, M. U.; Keiding, J. K.; Müller, D. B.; zu Ermgassen, S. O. S. E.; Liu, J.; Jaeger, J. A. G.; Winter, M.; Lambin, E. F. Sustainability of the global sand system in the Anthropocene. One Earth 2021, 4 (5), 639– 650, DOI: 10.1016/j.oneear.2021.04.011Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 162Franks, D. M.; Keenan, J.; Hailu, D. Mineral security essential to achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. Nat. Sustainability 2023, 6 (1), 21– 27, DOI: 10.1038/s41893-022-00967-9Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 163European Commission. Reference Document on Best Available Techniques for Management of Tailings and Waste-Rock in Mining Activities; ST/EIPPCB/MTWR_BREF_FINAL; European Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control Bureau (EIPPCB): Seville, Spain, 2009.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 164Graedel, T. E.; Nassar, N. T. The criticality of metals: a perspective for geologists. Geological Society, London, Special Publications 2015, 393 (1), 291– 302, DOI: 10.1144/SP393.4Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 165Hayes, S. M.; McCullough, E. A. Critical minerals: A review of elemental trends in comprehensive criticality studies. Resour. Policy 2018, 59, 192– 199, DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2018.06.015Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 166Yan, W.; Wang, Z.; Cao, H.; Zhang, Y.; Sun, Z. Criticality assessment of metal resources in China. iScience 2021, 24 (6), 102524, DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.102524Google Scholar166https://chemport.cas.org/services/resolver?origin=ACS&resolution=options&coi=1%3ACAS%3A280%3ADC%252BB2c7ps1Gjtw%253D%253D&md5=01c0c2c4e6d0e6082ea942e93d80ec5aCriticality assessment of metal resources in ChinaYan Wenyi; Cao Hongbin; Zhang Yi; Sun Zhi; Yan Wenyi; Cao Hongbin; Sun Zhi; Wang ZhaolongiScience (2021), 24 (6), 102524 ISSN:.With the development of modern industries, the sustainability of critical resources has attracted worldwide attention considering the entire supply chain. With a large industrial sector size in China, a safe supply of metal resources is crucial to ensure the effective operation of the whole industry. Although specific criticality analyses have been applied to identify critical resources in some regions, including Europe and the USA, they are not ready to be directly applied in the case of China because the structure of China's industry is remarkably different from other areas. In this research, a three-dimensional methodology considering supply safety, domestic economy, and environmental risk is demonstrated, where Chinese industrial conditions are specifically considered. In total, 64 materials were introduced to perform the criticality assessment, and 18 metals were classified with a high criticality degree in the three-dimensional criticality space. With the obtained findings decision-makers can formulate strategic deployment to promote resource management.
- 167McNulty, B. A.; Jowitt, S. M. Barriers to and uncertainties in understanding and quantifying global critical mineral and element supply. iScience 2021, 24 (7), 102809, DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.102809Google Scholar167https://chemport.cas.org/services/resolver?origin=ACS&resolution=options&coi=1%3ACAS%3A528%3ADC%252BB38Xos1ygsQ%253D%253D&md5=e07821c0fff4b7091177bc7d7f2d6368Barriers to and uncertainties in understanding and quantifying global critical mineral and element supplyMcNulty, Brian A.; Jowitt, Simon M.iScience (2021), 24 (7), 102809CODEN: ISCICE; ISSN:2589-0042. (Elsevier B.V.)A review. The crit. minerals and elements are natural substances that are essential to modern life but have insecure supply. This lack of a secure supply clashes with the increasing importance of these elements, esp. given their use in technologies needed to reduce global CO2 emissions and mitigate against anthropogenic climate change. In this contribution we review the byproduct nature of the crit. minerals and elements and the inherant uncertainties in reported crit. mineral and element annual prodn. as well as the relationships between these commodities and main-product metals and assocd. concs. We explore the geol. and geog. barriers to crit. mineral and element supplies, as well as how the lack of available data and the uncertainties in the data that are available hinder our ability to est. global resources with confidence.
- 168Schrijvers, D.; Hool, A.; Blengini, G. A.; Chen, W.-Q.; Dewulf, J.; Eggert, R.; van Ellen, L.; Gauss, R.; Goddin, J.; Habib, K.; Hagelüken, C.; Hirohata, A.; Hofmann-Amtenbrink, M.; Kosmol, J.; Le Gleuher, M.; Grohol, M.; Ku, A.; Lee, M.-H.; Liu, G.; Nansai, K.; Nuss, P.; Peck, D.; Reller, A.; Sonnemann, G.; Tercero, L.; Thorenz, A.; Wäger, P. A. A review of methods and data to determine raw material criticality. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2020, 155, 104617, DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104617Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 169Bringezu, S. Toward science-based and knowledge-based targets for global sustainable resource use. Resources 2019, 8 (3), 140, DOI: 10.3390/resources8030140Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 170United Nations; European Commission; International Monetary Fund; Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development; World Bank. Handbook of National Accounting: Integrated Environmental and Economic Accounting; United Nations: New York, 2003.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 171EUROSTAT. Economy-wide Material Flow Accounts. Handbook 2018 ed.; Eurostat: Luxembourg, 2018. DOI: 10.2785/158567 .Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 172Adriaanse, A.; Bringezu, S.; Hammond, A.; Moriguchi, Y.; Rodenburg, E.; Rogich, D.; Schütz, H. Resource Flows: The Material Basis of Industrial Economies; World Resources Inst.: WA, 1997.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 173Watari, T.; McLellan, B. C.; Giurco, D.; Dominish, E.; Yamasue, E.; Nansai, K. Total material requirement for the global energy transition to 2050: A focus on transport and electricity. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2019, 148, 91– 103, DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.05.015Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 174Global Economy Wide Material Flow Accounting Manual; UN Environment: Nairobi, 2019.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 175Bringezu, S. Possible Target Corridor for Sustainable Use of Global Material Resources. Resources 2015, 4 (1), 25– 54, DOI: 10.3390/resources4010025Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 176Zamorano, S. Surface ore movement, storage, and recovery systems. In SME Mining Engineering Handbook, 3rd ed.; Darling, P., Ed.; Society for Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration (SME), 2011; pp 977– 985.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 177European Commission. Best Available Techniques (BAT) Reference Document for the Management of Waste from Extractive Industries in Accordance with Directive 2006/21/EC; EU Publications Office: Luxembourg, 2018. DOI: 10.2760/35297 .Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 178Baker, E.; Davies, M.; Fourie, A.; Mudd, G.; Thygesen, K. Mine Tailings Facilities: Overview and Industry Trends. In Towards Zero Harm: A Compendium of Papers Prepared for the Global Tailings Review; Global Tailings Review: London, 2020; pp 14– 23.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 179Lottermoser, B. G. Mine Wastes: Characterization, Treatment and Environmental Impacts, 3rd ed.; Springer Berlin Heidelberg: Berlin, 2010.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 180Fields, S. The earth’s open wounds: abandoned and orphaned mines. Environ. Health Perspect. 2003, 111 (3), A154– A161, DOI: 10.1289/ehp.111-a154Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 181Seymour, J. F. Hardrock Mining and the Environment: Issues of Federal Enforcement and Liability. Ecol. Law Q. 2004, 31 (4), 795– 956Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 182Hudson-Edwards, K. A.; Jamieson, H. E.; Lottermoser, B. G. Mine Wastes: Past, Present, Future. Elements 2011, 7 (6), 375– 380, DOI: 10.2113/gselements.7.6.375Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 183Mittal, A. K. Abandoned Mines: Information on the Number of Hardrock Mines, Cost of Cleanup, and Value of Financial Assurances; Testimony Before the Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources, Committee on Natural Resources, House of Representatives; US Government Accountability Office: Washington, D.C., 14.07.2011, 2011.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 184Lottermoser, B. G. Recycling, Reuse and Rehabilitation of Mine Wastes. Elements 2011, 7 (6), 405– 410, DOI: 10.2113/gselements.7.6.405Google Scholar184https://chemport.cas.org/services/resolver?origin=ACS&resolution=options&coi=1%3ACAS%3A528%3ADC%252BC38XhsV2itrc%253D&md5=4d372f3184ed8c6d37edc5ae00164a27Recycling, reuse and rehabilitation of mine wastesLottermoser, Bernd G.Elements (Chantilly, VA, United States) (2011), 7 (6), 405-410CODEN: EOOCAG; ISSN:1811-5209. (Mineralogical Society of America)If we want to ensure a sustainable future for the human race, we must learn to prevent, minimize, reuse and recycle waste. Reuse of mine wastes allows their beneficial application, whereas recycling exts. resource ingredients or converts wastes into valuable products. Yet, today, many of the proposed reuse and recycling concepts for mine wastes are not economic. Consequently, the great majority of mine wastes are still being placed into waste storage facilities. Significant research efforts are required to develop cost-effective reuse and recycling options and to prevent the migration of contaminants from rehabilitated waste repositories in the long term.
- 185Franks, D. M.; Stringer, M.; Torres-Cruz, L. A.; Baker, E.; Valenta, R.; Thygesen, K.; Matthews, A.; Howchin, J.; Barrie, S. Tailings facility disclosures reveal stability risks. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11 (1), 5353, DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-84897-0Google Scholar185https://chemport.cas.org/services/resolver?origin=ACS&resolution=options&coi=1%3ACAS%3A528%3ADC%252BB3MXmtFWgtbo%253D&md5=73f64d303c46ed219384e1eb6465d498Tailings facility disclosures reveal stability risksFranks, Daniel M.; Stringer, Martin; Torres-Cruz, Luis A.; Baker, Elaine; Valenta, Rick; Thygesen, Kristina; Matthews, Adam; Howchin, John; Barrie, StephenScientific Reports (2021), 11 (1), 5353CODEN: SRCEC3; ISSN:2045-2322. (Nature Research)Abstr.: Tailings facility failures represent a significant risk to the environment and communities globally, but until now little data was available on the global distribution of risks and characteristics of facilities to ensure proper governance. We conducted a survey and compiled a database with information on tailings facilities disclosed by extractive companies at the request of institutional investors. Despite limitations in the data, this information disclosure request represents the most comprehensive survey of tailings facilities ever undertaken. The compiled dataset includes 1743 tailings facilities and provides insights into a range of topics including construction method, stability, consequence of failure, stored vol., and the rate of uptake of alternative technologies to dewater tailings and reduce geotech. risk. Our anal. reveals that 10 per cent of tailings facilities reported notable stability concerns or failure to be confirmed or certified as stable at some point in their history, with distinct trends according to construction method, governance, age, height, vol. and seismic hazard. Controversy has surrounded the safety of tailings facilities, most notably upstream facilities, for many years but in the absence of definitive empirical data differentiating the risks of different facility types, upstream facilities have continued to be used widely by the industry and a consensus has emerged that upstream facilities can theor. be built safely under the right circumstances. Our findings reveal that in practice active upstream facilities report a higher incidence of stability issues (18.3%) than other facility types, and that this elevated risk persists even when these facilities are built in high governance settings. In-pit/natural landform and dry-stack facilities report lower incidence of stability issues, though the rate of stability issues is significant by engineering stds. (> 2 per cent) across all construction methods, highlighting the universal importance of careful facility management and governance. The insights reported here can assist the global governance of tailings facility stability risks.
- 186Kirchherr, J.; Reike, D.; Hekkert, M. Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2017, 127, 221– 232, DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 187Song, Q.; Li, J.; Zeng, X. Minimizing the increasing solid waste through zero waste strategy. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 104, 199– 210, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.08.027Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 188Hilton, J.; Moussaid, M.; Birky, B. In Comprehensive Extraction: A Key Requirement for Social Licensing of NORM Industries?; Seventh International Symposium on Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material (NORM VII); International Atomic Energy Agency, 22-26.04.2013; Beijing, China, 2013; pp 129– 141.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 189MacDonald, D.; Hilton, J.; Elliott, D.; Heiberg, S.; Tulsidas, H.; Griffiths, C. In Transforming Natural Resource Management for a Sustainable Planet; SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition 2018, ATCE 2018; Dallas, U.S.A., 2018; p 10.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 190Blengini, G.; Mathieux, F.; Mancini, L.; Nyberg, M.; Viegas, H. Recovery of Critical and Other Raw Materials from Mining Waste and Landfills; Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2019. DOI: 10.2760/600775 .Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 191Lebre, E.; Stringer, M.; Svobodova, K.; Owen, J. R.; Kemp, D.; Cote, C.; Arratia-Solar, A.; Valenta, R. K. The social and environmental complexities of extracting energy transition metals. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11 (1), 4823, DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-18661-9Google Scholar191https://chemport.cas.org/services/resolver?origin=ACS&resolution=options&coi=1%3ACAS%3A528%3ADC%252BB3cXhvFOhsLrF&md5=c5ff76830ad6a18017da03b525fd230bThe social and environmental complexities of extracting energy transition metalsLebre, Eleonore; Stringer, Martin; Svobodova, Kamila; Owen, John R.; Kemp, Deanna; Cote, Claire; Arratia-Solar, Andrea; Valenta, Rick K.Nature Communications (2020), 11 (1), 4823CODEN: NCAOBW; ISSN:2041-1723. (Nature Research)Environmental, social and governance pressures should feature in future scenario planning about the transition to a low carbon future. As low-carbon energy technologies advance, markets are driving demand for energy transition metals. Increased extn. rates will augment the stress placed on people and the environment in extractive locations. To quantify this stress, we develop a set of global composite environmental, social and governance indicators, and examine mining projects across 20 metal commodities to identify the co-occurrence of environmental, social and governance risk factors. Our findings show that 84% of platinum resources and 70% of cobalt resources are located in high-risk contexts. Reflecting heightened demand, major metals like iron and copper are set to disturb more land. Jurisdictions extg. energy transition metals in low-risk contexts are positioned to develop and maintain safeguards against mining-related social and environmental risk factors.
- 192Suppes, R.; Heuss-Aßbichler, S. Resource potential of mine wastes: A conventional and sustainable perspective on a case study tailings mining project. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 297, 126446, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126446Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 193Žibret, G.; Lemiere, B.; Mendez, A.-M.; Cormio, C.; Sinnett, D.; Cleall, P.; Szabó, K.; Carvalho, M. T. National Mineral Waste Databases as an Information Source for Assessing Material Recovery Potential from Mine Waste, Tailings and Metallurgical Waste. Minerals 2020, 10 (5), 446, DOI: 10.3390/min10050446Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 194The Use of Natural Resources in the Economy: A Global Manual on Economy Wide Material Flow Accounting; DEW/2356/NA; United Nations Environment Programme: Nairobi, Kenya, 2023.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 195Lenzen, M.; Geschke, A.; West, J.; Fry, J.; Malik, A.; Giljum, S.; Milài Canals, L.; Piñero, P.; Lutter, S.; Wiedmann, T.; Li, M.; Sevenster, M.; Potočnik, J.; Teixeira, I.; Van Voore, M.; Nansai, K.; Schandl, H. Implementing the material footprint to measure progress towards Sustainable Development Goals 8 and 12. Nat. Sustainability 2022, 5 (2), 157– 166, DOI: 10.1038/s41893-021-00811-6Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 196Lebre, E.; Corder, G. D.; Golev, A. Sustainable practices in the management of mining waste: A focus on the mineral resource. Miner. Eng. 2017, 107, 34– 42, DOI: 10.1016/j.mineng.2016.12.004Google Scholar196https://chemport.cas.org/services/resolver?origin=ACS&resolution=options&coi=1%3ACAS%3A528%3ADC%252BC28XitFehsrbP&md5=db1feea1345e1a3081ddbfa0a471f1d5Sustainable practices in the management of mining waste: A focus on the mineral resourceLebre, Eleonore; Corder, Glen D.; Golev, ArtemMinerals Engineering (2017), 107 (), 34-42CODEN: MENGEB; ISSN:0892-6875. (Elsevier Ltd.)A review. The environmental legacies of metal mining are often dominated by large waste facilities, which can be sources of acid and metalliferous drainage, resulting in both local pollution and irreversible loss of some of the sol. minerals. Whether a material is treated as waste or ore depends on a wide variety of factors and circumstances. Three crit. aspects - time, the extractive strategy and the economic context - are discussed in this paper. The authors argue that the fine line between waste and ore requires a mine waste management (MWM) hierarchy that properly considers waste as a potential future resource. This hierarchy exhibits four main levels: reduce, reprocess & stockpile, downcycle and dispose, which are illustrated by a review of both academic research and public data on industrial practices. The authors conclude that to generate the most successful outcomes the hierarchy must operate across all levels and is a core component of an overall mine sustainability framework.
- 197Tuck, C. A.; Xun, S.; Singerling, S. A. Global Iron Ore Production Data; Clarification of Reporting from USGS. Mining Eng. 2017, 69 (2), 20– 23Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 198Driftsplanveileder Fast fjell; Direktoratet for mineralforvaltning med Bergmesteren for Svalbard: Trondheim, 2021.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 199CIM Estimation of Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves Best Practice Guidelines; CIM: Quebec, Canada, 2019.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 200CIM Leading Practice Guidelines for Mineral Processing; CIM: Quebec, Canada, 2022.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 201Apel, M. From 3d geomodelling systems towards 3d geoscience information systems: Data model, query functionality, and data management. Comput. Geosci. 2006, 32 (2), 222– 229, DOI: 10.1016/j.cageo.2005.06.016Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 202Berg, R. C.; Kessler, H.; MacCormack, K. E.; Russell, H. A.; Thorleifson, L. H. Future of 3D Geological Mapping and Modelling at Geological Survey Organizations. 2019 Synopsis of Three-dimensional Geological Mapping and Modelling at Geological Survey Organizations 2019, 302– 305Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 203Stafleu, J.; Maljers, D.; Busschers, F. S.; Schokker, J.; Gunnink, J. L.; Dambrink, R. M. Models Created as 3-D Cellular Voxel Arrays. Applied Multidimensional Geological Modeling 2021, 247– 271, DOI: 10.1002/9781119163091.ch11Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 204Dimitrakopoulos, R. Stochastic optimization for strategic mine planning: A decade of developments. J. Min. Sci. 2011, 47 (2), 138– 150, DOI: 10.1134/S1062739147020018Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 205Goodfellow, R. C.; Dimitrakopoulos, R. Global optimization of open pit mining complexes with uncertainty. Appl. Soft Comput. 2016, 40, 292– 304, DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2015.11.038Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 206Lindsay, M. D.; Aillères, L.; Jessell, M. W.; de Kemp, E. A.; Betts, P. G. Locating and quantifying geological uncertainty in three-dimensional models: Analysis of the Gippsland Basin, southeastern Australia. Tectonophysics 2012, 546–547, 10– 27, DOI: 10.1016/j.tecto.2012.04.007Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 207Krajnovich, A.; Zhou, W.; Gutierrez, M. Uncertainty assessment for 3D geologic modeling of fault zones based on geologic inputs and prior knowledge. Solid Earth 2020, 11 (4), 1457– 1474, DOI: 10.5194/se-11-1457-2020Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 208Bianchi, M.; Turner, A. K.; Lark, M.; Courrioux, G. Uncertainty in 3-D Geological Models. In Applied Multidimensional Geological Modeling; John Wiley & Sons Ltd: West Sussex, UK, 2021; pp 357– 382.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 209Dowd, P. Quantifying the Impacts of Uncertainty. In Handbook of Mathematical Geosciences: Fifty Years of IAMG; Daya Sagar, B. S., Cheng, Q., Agterberg, F., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, 2018; pp 349– 373.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 210Abdulai, M.; Sharifzadeh, M. Uncertainty and Reliability Analysis of Open Pit Rock Slopes: A Critical Review of Methods of Analysis. Geotech. Geol. Eng. 2019, 37 (3), 1223– 1247, DOI: 10.1007/s10706-018-0680-yGoogle ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 211Speirs, J.; McGlade, C.; Slade, R. Uncertainty in the availability of natural resources: Fossil fuels, critical metals and biomass. Energy Policy 2015, 87, 654– 664, DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2015.02.031Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 212McManus, S.; Rahman, A.; Coombes, J.; Horta, A. Uncertainty assessment of spatial domain models in early stage mining projects - A review. Ore Geol. Rev. 2021, 133, 104098, DOI: 10.1016/j.oregeorev.2021.104098Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 213Bloodworth, A. J.; Gunn, A. G. The future of the global minerals and metals sector: issues and challenges out to 2050. Geosciences: BRGM’s Journal for a Sustainable Earth 2012, 15, 90– 97Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 214Cole, L. How ending mining would change the world. 2022. https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20220413-how-ending-mining-would-change-the-world (accessed 18.04.2023).Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 215Liang, Y.; Kleijn, R.; Tukker, A.; van der Voet, E. Material requirements for low-carbon energy technologies: A quantitative review. Renew. Sust. Energy Rev. 2022, 161, 112334, DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2022.112334Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 216More, K. S.; Wolkersdorfer, C.; Kang, N.; Elmaghraby, A. S. Automated measurement systems in mine water management and mine workings - A review of potential methods. Water Resour. Ind. 2020, 24, 100136, DOI: 10.1016/j.wri.2020.100136Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 217Yousefi, M.; Carranza, E. J. M.; Kreuzer, O. P.; Nykänen, V.; Hronsky, J. M. A.; Mihalasky, M. J. Data analysis methods for prospectivity modelling as applied to mineral exploration targeting: State-of-the-art and outlook. J. Geochem. Explor. 2021, 229, 106839, DOI: 10.1016/j.gexplo.2021.106839Google Scholar217https://chemport.cas.org/services/resolver?origin=ACS&resolution=options&coi=1%3ACAS%3A528%3ADC%252BB3MXht12ju77L&md5=4e36be13cf5bb649c8f21825ce8ce34bData analysis methods for prospectivity modelling as applied to mineral exploration targeting: State-of-the-art and outlookYousefi, Mahyar; Carranza, Emmanuel John M.; Kreuzer, Oliver P.; Nykanen, Vesa; Hronsky, Jon M. A.; Mihalasky, Mark J.Journal of Geochemical Exploration (2021), 229 (), 106839CODEN: JGCEAT; ISSN:0375-6742. (Elsevier B.V.)Mineral exploration targeting is a highly complex decision-making task. Two key risk factors, the quality of exploration data and robustness of the underlying conceptual targeting model, have a strong impact on the effectiveness of this decision-making. Geog. information systems (GIS) can be used not only for compiling, integrating, interrogating and interpreting diverse exploration data, but also for targeting by employing powerful math. algorithms, an approach that is commonly referred to as mineral potential modeling or mineral prospectivity mapping (MPM). Here, we pose and examine key aspects around the question of "how can we get better at mineral exploration targeting using GIS". We do this by (1) reviewing the fundamental aspects of MPM, (2) identifying significant deficiencies of MPM, and (3) discussing possible solns. to alleviating or eliminating these deficiencies. In particular, we discuss how these deficiencies can be overcome by adopting an intelligence amplification system, such as the recently proposed exploration information system (EIS) for translating crit. ore-forming processes into spatially predictive criteria (i.e., predictor maps and spatial proxies) and improving decision-making in mineral exploration targeting.
- 218Nurmi, P. A. The Geological Survey of Finland strengthening its role as a key player in mineral raw materials innovation ecosystems. Geological Society, London, Special Publications 2020, 499 (1), 149– 163, DOI: 10.1144/SP499-2019-83Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 219Fogarty, J. J. An Economic Assessment of the Exploration Incentive Scheme: 10 years from 2009 to 2020; Prepared for the Department of Mines, Industry Regulation and Safety: Geological Survey of Western Australia: Perth, Australia, 2021.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 220Wittenberg, A.; Oliveira, D. d.; Jorgensen, L. F.; Gonzalez, F. J.; Heldal, T.; Aasly, K. A.; Deady, E.; Kumelj, Š.; Sievers, H.; Horvath, Z.; McGrath, E. GeoERA Raw Materials Monograph - The Past and the Future; Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources (BGR): Hannover, Germany, 2022. DOI: 10.25928/geoera_rawmat22_1 .Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 221Bide, T.; Brown, T. J.; Gunn, A. G.; Mankelow, J. M. Utilisation of multiple current and legacy datasets to create a national minerals inventory: A UK case study. Resour. Policy 2020, 66, 101654, DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101654Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 222van Genderen, J.; Goodchild, M. F.; Guo, H.; Yang, C.; Nativi, S.; Wang, L.; Wang, C. Digital Earth Challenges and Future Trends. In Manual of Digital Earth; Guo, H., Goodchild, M. F., Annoni, A., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2020; pp 811– 827.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 223Sudmanns, M.; Tiede, D.; Lang, S.; Bergstedt, H.; Trost, G.; Augustin, H.; Baraldi, A.; Blaschke, T. Big Earth data: disruptive changes in Earth observation data management and analysis?. International Journal of Digital Earth 2020, 13 (7), 832– 850, DOI: 10.1080/17538947.2019.1585976Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 224OneGelogy Consortium. OneGelogy - Providing geoscience data globally 2022. https://onegeology.org/ (accessed 18.04.2023).Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 225Baumann, P.; Rossi, A. P.; Bell, B.; Clements, O.; Evans, B.; Hoenig, H.; Hogan, P.; Kakaletris, G.; Koltsida, P.; Mantovani, S.; Marco Figuera, R.; Merticariu, V.; Misev, D.; Pham, H. B.; Siemen, S.; Wagemann, J. Fostering Cross-Disciplinary Earth Science Through Datacube Analytics. In Earth Observation Open Science and Innovation, Mathieu, P.-P.; Aubrecht, C., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, 2018; pp 91– 119.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 226O’Sullivan, C.; Wise, N.; Mathieu, P.-P. The Changing Landscape of Geospatial Information Markets. In Earth Observation Open Science and Innovation; Mathieu, P.-P., Aubrecht, C., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, 2018; pp 3– 23.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 227Zhu, Z.; Zhou, Y.; Seto, K. C.; Stokes, E. C.; Deng, C.; Pickett, S. T. A.; Taubenböck, H. Understanding an urbanizing planet: Strategic directions for remote sensing. Remote Sens. Environ. 2019, 228, 164– 182, DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2019.04.020Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 228Prakash, M.; Ramage, S.; Kavvada, A.; Goodman, S. Open Earth Observations for Sustainable Urban Development. Remote Sens. 2020, 12 (10), 1646, DOI: 10.3390/rs12101646Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 229Maus, V.; Giljum, S.; da Silva, D. M.; Gutschlhofer, J.; da Rosa, R. P.; Luckeneder, S.; Gass, S. L. B.; Lieber, M.; McCallum, I. An update on global mining land use. Sci. Data 2022, 9 (1), 433, DOI: 10.1038/s41597-022-01547-4Google Scholar229https://chemport.cas.org/services/resolver?origin=ACS&resolution=options&coi=1%3ACAS%3A280%3ADC%252BB2MbhvFaruw%253D%253D&md5=b1d8cfbec1c029d44129c098d525ecb6An update on global mining land useMaus Victor; Giljum Stefan; Gutschlhofer Jakob; Luckeneder Sebastian; Lieber Mirko; Maus Victor; McCallum Ian; da Silva Dieison M; Gass Sidnei L B; da Rosa Robson PScientific data (2022), 9 (1), 433 ISSN:.The growing demand for minerals has pushed mining activities into new areas increasingly affecting biodiversity-rich natural biomes. Mapping the land use of the global mining sector is, therefore, a prerequisite for quantifying, understanding and mitigating adverse impacts caused by mineral extraction. This paper updates our previous work mapping mining sites worldwide. Using visual interpretation of Sentinel-2 images for 2019, we inspected more than 34,000 mining locations across the globe. The result is a global-scale dataset containing 44,929 polygon features covering 101,583 km(2) of large-scale as well as artisanal and small-scale mining. The increase in coverage is substantial compared to the first version of the dataset, which included 21,060 polygons extending over 57,277 km(2). The polygons cover open cuts, tailings dams, waste rock dumps, water ponds, processing plants, and other ground features related to the mining activities. The dataset is available for download from https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.942325 and visualisation at www.fineprint.global/viewer .
- 230Ren, H.; Zhao, Y.; Xiao, W.; Hu, Z. A review of UAV monitoring in mining areas: current status and future perspectives. Int. J. Coal Sci. 2019, 6 (3), 320– 333, DOI: 10.1007/s40789-019-00264-5Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 231Tucci, G.; Gebbia, A.; Conti, A.; Fiorini, L.; Lubello, C. Monitoring and Computation of the Volumes of Stockpiles of Bulk Material by Means of UAV Photogrammetric Surveying. Remote Sens. 2019, 11 (12), 1471, DOI: 10.3390/rs11121471Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 232New Tech, new deal - Technology Impacts Review; Intergovernmental Forum on Mining, Minerals, Metals and Sustainable Development (IGF). International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD): Winnipeg, Canada, 2019.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 233Jang, H.; Topal, E. Transformation of the Australian mining industry and future prospects. Mining Technology 2020, 129 (3), 120– 134, DOI: 10.1080/25726668.2020.1786298Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 234Li, W.; Hsu, C.-Y. GeoAI for Large-Scale Image Analysis and Machine Vision: Recent Progress of Artificial Intelligence in Geography. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 2022, 11 (7), 385, DOI: 10.3390/ijgi11070385Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 235Smith, W. D.; Maier, W. D. The geotectonic setting, age and mineral deposit inventory of global layered intrusions. Earth-Sci. Rev. 2021, 220, 103736, DOI: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2021.103736Google Scholar235https://chemport.cas.org/services/resolver?origin=ACS&resolution=options&coi=1%3ACAS%3A528%3ADC%252BB3MXhsFCjsrvN&md5=d3fd29bde1324d44cddf7f4423a79df5The geotectonic setting, age and mineral deposit inventory of global layered intrusionsSmith, W. D.; Maier, W. D.Earth-Science Reviews (2021), 220 (), 103736CODEN: ESREAV; ISSN:0012-8252. (Elsevier B.V.)A review. In the present paper, we have compiled data on 565 layered and differentiated igneous intrusions globally, documenting their (i) location, (ii) age, (iii) size, (iv) geotectonic setting, (v) putative parent magma(s), (vi) crystn. sequence, and (vii) mineral deposits. Most studied intrusions occur in Russia (98), Australia (72), Canada (52), Finland (37), South Africa (38), China (33), and Brazil (31). Notable clusters of: (i) Archaean intrusions (∼ 15%) include those of the McFaulds Lake Area (commonly known as the Ring of Fire, Canada), Pilbara and Yilgarn cratons (Australia), and Barberton (South Africa); (ii) Proterozoic intrusions (∼ 56%) include those of the Giles Event and Halls Creek Orogen (Australia), Kaapvaal craton and its margin (South Africa and Botswana), Kola and Karelia cratons (Finland and Russia), and Midcontinent Rift (Canada and USA); and (iii) Phanerozoic intrusions (∼ 29%) include those of eastern Greenland, the Central Asian Orogenic Belt (China and Mongolia) and Emeishan large igneous province (China). Throughout geol. time, the occurrence of many layered intrusions correlate broadly with the amalgamation and break-up of supercontinents, yet the size and mineral inventory of intrusions shows no obvious secular changes. In our compilation, 337 intrusions possess one or more types of mineral occurrences, including: (i) 107 with stratiform PGE reef-style mineralization, (ii) 138 with Ni-Cu-(PGE) contact-style mineralization, (iii) 74 with stratiform Fe-Ti-V-(P) horizons, and (iv) ≥ 35 with chromitite seams. Sill-like or chonolithic differentiated intrusions present in extensional tectonic settings and spanning geol. time are most prospective for Ni-Cu-(PGE) mineralization. In contrast, PGE reef-style deposits are most prevalent in larger, commonly lopolithic intrusions that are generally >1 Ga in age (∼ 75%). Stratiform Fe-Ti-V-(P) horizons are most common in the central and upper portions of larger layered intrusions, occurring in the Archaean and Phanerozoic. Approx. 80% of intrusions with chromitite seams are older than 1 Ga and greater than 50% of them also contain PGE reefs. Based on the distribution of layered intrusions in relatively well explored terranes (e.g., Finland, South Africa, Western Australia), we propose that many layered intrusions remain to be discovered on Earth, particularly in poorly explored and relatively inaccessible regions of Africa, Australia, Russia, Greenland, Antarctica, South America, and northern Canada.
- 236Dong, J.; Metternicht, G.; Hostert, P.; Fensholt, R.; Chowdhury, R. R. Remote sensing and geospatial technologies in support of a normative land system science: status and prospects. COSUST 2019, 38, 44– 52, DOI: 10.1016/j.cosust.2019.05.003Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 237Gorelick, N.; Hancher, M.; Dixon, M.; Ilyushchenko, S.; Thau, D.; Moore, R. Google Earth Engine: Planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone. Remote Sens. Environ. 2017, 202, 18– 27, DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2017.06.031Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 238Planetary Computer; Microsoft, 2022.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 239Kopp, S.; Becker, P.; Doshi, A.; Wright, D. J.; Zhang, K.; Xu, H. Achieving the Full Vision of Earth Observation Data Cubes. Data 2019, 4 (3), 94, DOI: 10.3390/data4030094Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 240Bauer, P.; Dueben, P. D.; Hoefler, T.; Quintino, T.; Schulthess, T. C.; Wedi, N. P. The digital revolution of Earth-system science. Nature Computational Science 2021, 1 (2), 104– 113, DOI: 10.1038/s43588-021-00023-0Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 241Graciano, A.; Rueda, A. J.; Feito, F. R. Real-time visualization of 3D terrains and subsurface geological structures. Adv. Eng. Software 2018, 115, 314– 326, DOI: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2017.10.002Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 242Schokker, J.; Sandersen, P.; de Beer, J.; Eriksson, I.; Kallio, H.; Kearsey, T.; Pfleiderer, S.; Seither, A. 3D Urban Subsurface Modelling and Visualisation - A Review of Good Practices and Techniques to Ensure Optimal Use of Geological Information in Urban Planning; COST Action Sub-Urban, 2017.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 243Baumberger, R.; Oesterling, N. The National Geological Model: Towards mastering the Digital Transformation in Switzerland. In Three-Dimensional Geological Mapping and Modeling; Vancouver, BC, 2018; pp 19– 23.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 244Guo, J.; Wang, X.; Wang, J.; Dai, X.; Wu, L.; Li, C.; Li, F.; Liu, S.; Jessell, M. W. Three-dimensional geological modeling and spatial analysis from geotechnical borehole data using an implicit surface and marching tetrahedra algorithm. Eng. Geol. 2021, 284, 106047, DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2021.106047Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 245Guo, H.; Li, X.; Wang, W.; Lv, Z.; Wu, C.; Xu, W. An event-driven dynamic updating method for 3D geo-databases. Geo-Spat. Inf. Sci. 2016, 19 (2), 140– 147, DOI: 10.1080/10095020.2016.1182808Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 246Marker, B.; Turner, A. K. Legislation, regulation and management. In Applied Multidimensional Geological Modeling; Turner, A. K., Kessler, H., Van der Meulen, M., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons, 2021; pp 35– 68.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 247Grieves, M. Virtually Intelligent Product Systems: Digital and Physical Twins. In Complex Systems Engineering: Theory and Practice; Flumerfelt, S., Schwartz, K. G., Mavris, D., Briceno, S., Eds. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics: Reston, VA, 2019; pp 175– 200.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 248Rasheed, A.; San, O.; Kvamsdal, T. Digital Twin: Values, Challenges and Enablers From a Modeling Perspective. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 21980– 22012, DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2970143Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 249Zobl, F.; Marschallinger, R. GeoBIM - Subsurface Building Information Modelling. GEOinformatics 2008, 8 (11), 40– 43Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 250Huang, M. Q.; Ninić, J.; Zhang, Q. B. BIM, machine learning and computer vision techniques in underground construction: Current status and future perspectives. Tunnel. Underground Space Technol. 2021, 108, 103677, DOI: 10.1016/j.tust.2020.103677Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 251Gore, A. The digital earth: understanding our planet in the 21st century. Australian surveyor 1998, 43 (2), 89– 91, DOI: 10.1080/00050348.1998.10558728Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 252Coalition for Digital Environmental Sustainability. Action Plan for a Sustainable Planet in the Digital Age ; United Nations: 2022. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.6573509 .Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 253Van Oosterom, P.; Stoter, J. 5D data modelling: full integration of 2D/3D space, time and scale dimensions; International Conference on Geographic Information Science, 2010; Springer: 2010; pp 310– 324.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 254Turner, A. K.; Kessler, H.; Van der Meulen, M. Introduction to modeling terminology and concepts. In Applied Multidimensional Geological Modeling, Turner, A. K.; Kessler, H.; Van der Meulen, M., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons, 2021; pp 3– 33.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 255Breunig, M.; Bradley, P. E.; Jahn, M.; Kuper, P.; Mazroob, N.; Rösch, N.; Al-Doori, M.; Stefanakis, E.; Jadidi, M. Geospatial Data Management Research: Progress and Future Directions. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 2020, 9 (2), 95, DOI: 10.3390/ijgi9020095Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 256Baumann, P. A General Conceptual Framework for Multi-Dimensional Spatio-Temporal Data Sets. Environ. Model. Software 2021, 143, 105096, DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2021.105096Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 257European Commission. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions - A European strategy for data. Official Journal of the European Union, COM/2020/66 final, 2020.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 258van den Brink, L.; Barnaghi, P.; Tandy, J.; Atemezing, G.; Atkinson, R.; Cochrane, B.; Fathy, Y.; Garcia Castro, R.; Haller, A.; Harth, A.; Janowicz, K.; Kolozali, S.; van Leeuwen, B.; Lefrancois, M.; Lieberman, J.; Perego, A.; Le-Phuoc, D.; Roberts, B.; Taylor, K.; Troncy, R. Best practices for publishing, retrieving, and using spatial data on the web. Semantic Web 2018, 10 (1), 95– 114, DOI: 10.3233/SW-180305Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 259European Commission. Directive 2007/2/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 March 2007 establishing an Infrastructure for Spatial Information in the European Community (INSPIRE). Official Journal of the European Union, L 108, 1–14, 2007.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 260Deep-time Digital Earth (DDE) 2020–2030; International Union of Geological Sciences IUGS: Yangcheng, China, 2022.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 261Wang, C.; Hazen, R. M.; Cheng, Q.; Stephenson, M. H.; Zhou, C.; Fox, P.; Shen, S.-z.; Oberhänsli, R.; Hou, Z.; Ma, X.; Feng, Z.; Fan, J.; Ma, C.; Hu, X.; Luo, B.; Wang, J.; Schiffries, C. M. The Deep-Time Digital Earth program: data-driven discovery in geosciences. Natl. Sci. Rev. 2021, 8 (9), nwab027, DOI: 10.1093/nsr/nwab027Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 262Xu, L. D. The contribution of systems science to Industry 4.0. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 2020, 37 (4), 618– 631, DOI: 10.1002/sres.2705Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 263Åm, K.; Heiberg, S. Public-private partnership for improved hydrocarbon recovery - Lessons from Norway’s major development programs. Energy Strategy Reviews 2014, 3, 30– 48, DOI: 10.1016/j.esr.2014.06.003Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 264Prahalad, C. K.; Ramaswamy, V. Co-creation experiences: The next practice in value creation. J. Interact. Mark. 2004, 18 (3), 5– 14, DOI: 10.1002/dir.20015Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 265Scott, M.; Jones, M. Management of Public Geoscience Data; International Mining for Development Centre (IM4DC): Perth, Australia, 2014.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 266Nad, A.; Jooshaki, M.; Tuominen, E.; Michaux, S.; Kirpala, A.; Newcomb, J. Digitalization Solutions in the Mineral Processing Industry: The Case of GTK Mintec, Finland. Minerals 2022, 12 (2), 210, DOI: 10.3390/min12020210Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 267Sun, Z.; Sandoval, L.; Crystal-Ornelas, R.; Mousavi, S. M.; Wang, J.; Lin, C.; Cristea, N.; Tong, D.; Carande, W. H.; Ma, X.; Rao, Y.; Bednar, J. A.; Tan, A.; Wang, J.; Purushotham, S.; Gill, T. E.; Chastang, J.; Howard, D.; Holt, B.; Gangodagamage, C.; Zhao, P.; Rivas, P.; Chester, Z.; Orduz, J.; John, A. A review of Earth Artificial Intelligence. Comput. Geosci. 2022, 159, 105034, DOI: 10.1016/j.cageo.2022.105034Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 268Litvinenko, V. S. Digital Economy as a Factor in the Technological Development of the Mineral Sector. Nat. Resour. Res. 2020, 29 (3), 1521– 1541, DOI: 10.1007/s11053-019-09568-4Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 269Ghorbani, Y.; Zhang, S. E.; Nwaila, G. T.; Bourdeau, J. E. Framework components for data-centric dry laboratories in the minerals industry: A path to science-and-technology-led innovation. Extr. Ind. Soc. 2022, 10, 101089, DOI: 10.1016/j.exis.2022.101089Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 270McCuaig, T. C.; Hronsky, J. M. A.; Kelley, K. D.; Golden, H. C. The Mineral System Concept: The Key to Exploration Targeting. In Building Exploration Capability for the 21st Century; Society of Economic Geologists: 2014; Vol. 18, p 0.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 271Lawrence, M. G.; Williams, S.; Nanz, P.; Renn, O. Characteristics, potentials, and challenges of transdisciplinary research. One Earth 2022, 5 (1), 44– 61, DOI: 10.1016/j.oneear.2021.12.010Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 272UNEA. Mineral Resource Governance. United Nations Environment Programme, 2019.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 273Wilkinson, M. D.; Dumontier, M.; Aalbersberg, I. J.; Appleton, G.; Axton, M.; Baak, A.; Blomberg, N.; Boiten, J.-W.; da Silva Santos, L. B.; Bourne, P. E.; Bouwman, J.; Brookes, A. J.; Clark, T.; Crosas, M.; Dillo, I.; Dumon, O.; Edmunds, S.; Evelo, C. T.; Finkers, R.; Gonzalez-Beltran, A.; Gray, A. J. G.; Groth, P.; Goble, C.; Grethe, J. S.; Heringa, J.; ’t Hoen, P. A. C.; Hooft, R.; Kuhn, T.; Kok, R.; Kok, J.; Lusher, S. J.; Martone, M. E.; Mons, A.; Packer, A. L.; Persson, B.; Rocca-Serra, P.; Roos, M.; van Schaik, R.; Sansone, S.-A.; Schultes, E.; Sengstag, T.; Slater, T.; Strawn, G.; Swertz, M. A.; Thompson, M.; van der Lei, J.; van Mulligen, E.; Velterop, J.; Waagmeester, A.; Wittenburg, P.; Wolstencroft, K.; Zhao, J.; Mons, B. The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci. Data 2016, 3 (1), 160018, DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2016.18Google Scholar273https://chemport.cas.org/services/resolver?origin=ACS&resolution=options&coi=1%3ACAS%3A280%3ADC%252BC28bjslyrtQ%253D%253D&md5=e4ce8cf366db2280e54eb0168940720bThe FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardshipWilkinson Mark D; Dumontier Michel; Aalbersberg I Jsbrand Jan; Appleton Gabrielle; Dumon Olivier; Groth Paul; Strawn George; Axton Myles; Baak Arie; Blomberg Niklas; Boiten Jan-Willem; da Silva Santos Luiz Bonino; Bourne Philip E; Bouwman Jildau; Brookes Anthony J; Clark Tim; Crosas Merce; Dillo Ingrid; Edmunds Scott; Evelo Chris T; Finkers Richard; Gonzalez-Beltran Alejandra; Rocca-Serra Philippe; Sansone Susanna-Assunta; Gray Alasdair J G; Goble Carole; Grethe Jeffrey S; Heringa Jaap; Kok Ruben; 't Hoen Peter A C; Hooft Rob; Kuhn Tobias; Kok Joost; Lusher Scott J; Mons Barend; Martone Maryann E; Mons Albert; Packer Abel L; Persson Bengt; Roos Marco; Thompson Mark; van Schaik Rene; Schultes Erik; Sengstag Thierry; Slater Ted; Swertz Morris A; van der Lei Johan; van Mulligen Erik; Mons Barend; Velterop Jan; Waagmeester Andra; Wittenburg Peter; Wolstencroft Katherine; Zhao Jun; Mons BarendScientific data (2016), 3 (), 160018 ISSN:.There is an urgent need to improve the infrastructure supporting the reuse of scholarly data. A diverse set of stakeholders-representing academia, industry, funding agencies, and scholarly publishers-have come together to design and jointly endorse a concise and measureable set of principles that we refer to as the FAIR Data Principles. The intent is that these may act as a guideline for those wishing to enhance the reusability of their data holdings. Distinct from peer initiatives that focus on the human scholar, the FAIR Principles put specific emphasis on enhancing the ability of machines to automatically find and use the data, in addition to supporting its reuse by individuals. This Comment is the first formal publication of the FAIR Principles, and includes the rationale behind them, and some exemplar implementations in the community.
- 274Ubaldi, B. Open Government Data: Towards Empirical Analysis of Open Government Data Initiatives; Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development: 2013. DOI: 10.1787/5k46bj4f03s7-en .Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 275Recommendation of the Council on Enhancing Access to and Sharing of Data; Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2022.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 276Integrated Geospatial Information Framework: A Strategic Guide to Develop and Strengthen National Geospatial Information Management - Part 1: Overarching Strategic Framework; World Bank, United Nations Committee of Experts on Global Geospatial Information Management (UN-GGIM): New York, 2018.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 277UN-GGIM. The Global Statistical Geospatial Framework; United Nations: New York, 2019.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 278Tate, M.; Bongiovanni, I.; Kowalkiewicz, M.; Townson, P. Managing the “Fuzzy front end” of open digital service innovation in the public sector: A methodology. IJIM 2018, 39, 186– 198, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.11.008Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 279Gray, S. J.; Hellman, N.; Ivanova, M. N. Extractive Industries Reporting: A Review of Accounting Challenges and the Research Literature. Abacus 2019, 55 (1), 42– 91, DOI: 10.1111/abac.12147Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 2802017 Resource Governance Index; Natural Resource Governance Institute (NRGI): New York, 2017.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 281Van Alstine, J. Critical reflections on 15 years of the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI). Extr. Ind. Soc. 2017, 4 (4), 766– 770, DOI: 10.1016/j.exis.2017.10.010Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 282EITI Progress Report 2022; Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI): Oslo, Norway, 2022.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 283Proposals for a Relevant and Dynamic EU Sustainability Reporting Standard-Setting; European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG): Brussels, Belgium, 2021.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 284Geels, F. W.; Schwanen, T.; Sorrell, S.; Jenkins, K.; Sovacool, B. K. Reducing energy demand through low carbon innovation: A sociotechnical transitions perspective and thirteen research debates. ERSS 2018, 40, 23– 35, DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2017.11.003Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 285IGF Guidance for Governments: Environmental Management and Mining Governance; Intergovernmental Forum on Mining, Minerals, Metals and Sustainable Development (IGF): Winnipeg, 2021.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 286Vision 2050 - Time to Transform: How business can lead the transformations the world needs; World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD): Geneva, Switzerland, 2021.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 287Transforming Extractive Industries for Sustainable Development; United Nations Executive Office of the Secretary-General (EOSG): New York, 2021. DOI: DOI: 10.18356/27082245-22 .Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 288Berg, F.; Koelbel, J. F.; Rigobon, R. Aggregate confusion: The divergence of ESG ratings. Rev. Financ. 2022, 26 (6), 1315– 1344, DOI: 10.1093/rof/rfac033Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 289Petravatzi, E.; Müller, D. B.; Lundhaug, M.; Liu, G.; Cullen, J.; Simoni, M. U.; Dittrich, M.; Cao, Z.; Murguía, D.; Hirschnitz-Garbers, M.; Hamadová, B. MinFuture Roadmap - A Roadmap Towards Monitoring the Physical Economy; Nottingham, UK, 2018.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 290Fonseca, A.; McAllister, M. L.; Fitzpatrick, P. Measuring what? A comparative anatomy of five mining sustainability frameworks. Miner. Eng. 2013, 46–47, 180– 186, DOI: 10.1016/j.mineng.2013.04.008Google Scholar290https://chemport.cas.org/services/resolver?origin=ACS&resolution=options&coi=1%3ACAS%3A528%3ADC%252BC3sXotl2gtbw%253D&md5=366d4d5d22f9ffa5e12803773b521392Measuring what? A comparative anatomy of five mining sustainability frameworksFonseca, Alberto; McAllister, Mary Louise; Fitzpatrick, PatriciaMinerals Engineering (2013), 46-47 (), 180-186CODEN: MENGEB; ISSN:0892-6875. (Elsevier Ltd.)Recent years have seen a proliferation of frameworks for assessing and reporting mining sustainability. While these frameworks vary substantially in scope and approach, they all seem to share the purported goal of better informing decision-makers about the future implications of mining to the environment and society. Whether they do so, however, remains an open question. The purpose of this paper is to describe, compare and critically analyze five sustainability assessment and reporting frameworks used by, or proposed for, the mining industry. Based on literature reviews, the paper highlights the underlying assumptions of those frameworks and presents a diagram that helps to clarify aspects such as temporal orientation, geog. scope and quantity of indicators. Three out of the five frameworks follow a siloed approach to assessing mining sustainability, overlooking trade-offs and synergies among variables and sustainability dimensions. None of the frameworks seems to fully shed light on the problem of mineral scarcity and the effective legacy of mineral operations. The paper concludes by emphasizing the need to carefully consider the information generated by the analyzed frameworks and suggest more fruitful ways to foster sustainability reports.
- 291General Requirements for Disclosure of Sustainability-related Financial Information. General Requirements Exposure Draft; Exposure Draft IFRS S1 International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB): London, 2022.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 292Haasnoot, M.; Biesbroek, R.; Lawrence, J.; Muccione, V.; Lempert, R.; Glavovic, B. Defining the solution space to accelerate climate change adaptation. Reg. Environ. Change 2020, 20 (2), 37, DOI: 10.1007/s10113-020-01623-8Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 293Giesekam, J.; Norman, J.; Garvey, A.; Betts-Davies, S. Science-Based Targets: On Target?. Sustainability 2021, 13 (4), 1657, DOI: 10.3390/su13041657Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 294Wiek, A.; Binder, C. Solution spaces for decision-making─a sustainability assessment tool for city-regions. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2005, 25 (6), 589– 608, DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2004.09.009Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 295Rockström, J.; Gupta, J.; Lenton, T. M.; Qin, D.; Lade, S. J.; Abrams, J. F.; Jacobson, L.; Rocha, J. C.; Zimm, C.; Bai, X.; Bala, G.; Bringezu, S.; Broadgate, W.; Bunn, S. E.; DeClerck, F.; Ebi, K. L.; Gong, P.; Gordon, C.; Kanie, N.; Liverman, D. M.; Nakicenovic, N.; Obura, D.; Ramanathan, V.; Verburg, P. H.; van Vuuren, D. P.; Winkelmann, R. Identifying a Safe and Just Corridor for People and the Planet. Earth's Future 2021, 9 (4), e2020EF001866 DOI: 10.1029/2020EF001866Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 296European Commission. Directive 2019/1024 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 June 2019 on open data and the re-use of public sector information. Official Journal of the European Union, L 172, 56–83, 2019.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 297European Commission. Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/138 of 21 December 2022 laying down a list of specific high-value datasets and the arrangements for their publication and re-use. Official Journal of the European Union, L 19, 43–75, 2023.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 298Koninkrijk der Nederlanden. Regulation on the National Key Registry for the Subsurface (Regeling basisregistratie ondergrond, BRO). Minister van Binnenlandse Zaken en Koninkrijksrelaties, Nederlande, 2021.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 299Norwegian Petroleum Directorate. Diskos Handbook , Version 2.0; May 2019; Norwegian Petroleum Directorate: Stavanger, Norway, 2019.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 300Olje-og energidepartementet. Forskrift om ressursforvaltning i petroleumsvirksomheten (ressursforskriften). 2021.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 301Kolbjørnsen, O.; Hammer, E.; Pruno, S.; Wellsbury, P.; Kusak, M. In Norwegian Released Wells Project: Study Design, Material Preparation, Measurements and Data Analysis; SPWLA 63rd Annual Logging Symposium, 2022; 2022.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 302Ostrom, E. A General Framework for Analyzing Sustainability of Social-Ecological Systems. Science 2009, 325 (5939), 419– 422, DOI: 10.1126/science.1172133Google Scholar302https://chemport.cas.org/services/resolver?origin=ACS&resolution=options&coi=1%3ACAS%3A528%3ADC%252BD1MXovVCht7k%253D&md5=1bfc7005a7e880f2f91f3f3318336ff2A General Framework for Analyzing Sustainability of Social-Ecological SystemsOstrom, ElinorScience (Washington, DC, United States) (2009), 325 (5939), 419-422CODEN: SCIEAS; ISSN:0036-8075. (American Association for the Advancement of Science)A major problem worldwide is the potential loss of fisheries, forests, and water resources. Understanding of the processes that lead to improvements in or deterioration of natural resources is limited, because scientific disciplines use different concepts and languages to describe and explain complex social-ecol. systems (SESs). Without a common framework to organize findings, isolated knowledge does not cumulate. Until recently, accepted theory has assumed that resource users will never self-organize to maintain their resources and that governments must impose solns. Research in multiple disciplines, however, has found that some government policies accelerate resource destruction, whereas some resource users have invested their time and energy to achieve sustainability. A general framework is used to identify 10 subsystem variables that affect the likelihood of self-organization in efforts to achieve a sustainable SES.
- 303Steffen, W.; Crutzen, P. J.; McNeill, J. R. The Anthropocene: are humans now overwhelming the great forces of nature. Ambio 2007, 36 (8), 614– 621, DOI: 10.1579/0044-7447(2007)36[614:TAAHNO]2.0.CO;2Google Scholar303https://chemport.cas.org/services/resolver?origin=ACS&resolution=options&coi=1%3ACAS%3A528%3ADC%252BD1cXksFSqsrs%253D&md5=e1676aca143489c8d02b751eab9f7e10The Anthropocene: are humans now overwhelming the great forces at nature?Steffen, Will; Crutzen, Paul J.; McNeill, John R.Ambio (2007), 36 (8), 614-621CODEN: AMBOCX; ISSN:0044-7447. (Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences)The development of the Anthropocene, the current epoch in which humans and our societies have become a global geophys. force, is described. The Anthropocene began around 1800 with the onset of industrialization, the central feature of which was the enormous expansion in the use of fossil fuels. Atm. carbon dioxide concn. is suitable as a single, simple indicator to track the progression of the Anthropocene. From a preindustrial value of 270-275 ppm, atm. carbon dioxide had risen to ∼310 ppm by 1950. Since then the human enterprise has experienced a remarkable explosion, the Great Acceleration, with significant consequences for Earth System functioning. Atm. CO2 concn. has risen from 310 to 380 ppm since 1950, with about half of the total rise since the preindustrial era occurring in just the last 30 years. The Great Acceleration is reaching criticality. Whatever unfolds, the next few decades will surely be a tipping point in the evolution of the Anthropocene.
- 304Bateman, I. J.; Mace, G. M. The natural capital framework for sustainably efficient and equitable decision making. Nat. Sustainability 2020, 3 (10), 776– 783, DOI: 10.1038/s41893-020-0552-3Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 305Steffen, W.; Rockström, J.; Richardson, K.; Lenton, T. M.; Folke, C.; Liverman, D.; Summerhayes, C. P.; Barnosky, A. D.; Cornell, S. E.; Crucifix, M.; Donges, J. F.; Fetzer, I.; Lade, S. J.; Scheffer, M.; Winkelmann, R.; Schellnhuber, H. J. Trajectories of the Earth System in the Anthropocene. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2018, 115 (33), 8252– 8259, DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1810141115Google Scholar305https://chemport.cas.org/services/resolver?origin=ACS&resolution=options&coi=1%3ACAS%3A528%3ADC%252BC1cXitVCiurvJ&md5=6a6b33c23839162fb166c1c1e17e0618Trajectories of the Earth System in the AnthropoceneSteffen, Will; Rockstroem, Johan; Richardson, Katherine; Lenton, Timothy M.; Folke, Carl; Liverman, Diana; Summerhayes, Colin P.; Barnosky, Anthony D.; Cornell, Sarah E.; Crucifix, Michel; Donges, Jonathan F.; Fetzer, Ingo; Lade, Steven J.; Scheffer, Marten; Winkelmann, Ricarda; Schellnhuber, Hans JoachimProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (2018), 115 (33), 8252-8259CODEN: PNASA6; ISSN:0027-8424. (National Academy of Sciences)We explore the risk that self-reinforcing feedbacks could push the Earth System toward a planetary threshold that, if crossed, could prevent stabilization of the climate at intermediate temp. rises and cause continued warming on a "Hothouse Earth" pathway even as human emissions are reduced. Crossing the threshold would lead to a much higher global av. temp. than any interglacial in the past 1.2 million years and to sea levels significantly higher than at any time in the Holocene. We examine the evidence that such a threshold might exist and where it might be. If the threshold is crossed, the resulting trajectory would likely cause serious disruptions to ecosystems, society, and economies. Collective human action is required to steer the Earth System away from a potential threshold and stabilize it in a habitable interglacial-like state. Such action entails stewardship of the entire Earth System-biosphere, climate, and societies-and could include decarbonization of the global economy, enhancement of biosphere carbon sinks, behavioral changes, technol. innovations, new governance arrangements, and transformed social values.
- 306Wackernagel, M.; Hanscom, L.; Jayasinghe, P.; Lin, D.; Murthy, A.; Neill, E.; Raven, P. The importance of resource security for poverty eradication. Nat. Sustainability 2021, 4 (8), 731– 738, DOI: 10.1038/s41893-021-00708-4Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
Cited By
Smart citations by scite.ai include citation statements extracted from the full text of the citing article. The number of the statements may be higher than the number of citations provided by ACS Publications if one paper cites another multiple times or lower if scite has not yet processed some of the citing articles.
This article is cited by 4 publications.
- Titouan Greffe, Max Frenzel, Tim T. Werner, Gavin Mudd, Peng Wang, Manuele Margni, Cécile Bulle. Byproduct-to-Host Ratios for Assessing the Accessibility of Mineral Resources. Environmental Science & Technology 2024, 58
(50)
, 22213-22223. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c05293
- Ryosuke Yokoi, Masaharu Motoshita, Takeshi Matsuda, Norihiro Itsubo. Country-Specific External Costs of Abiotic Resource Use Based on User Cost Model in Life Cycle Impact Assessment. Environmental Science & Technology 2024, 58
(18)
, 7849-7859. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c00100
- Liyuan Liu, Juan Jin, Jiandong Liu, Wei Cheng, Minghui Zhao, Shengwen Luo, Yifan Luo, Tao Wang. Mechanical properties of sandstone under in-situ high-temperature and confinement conditions. International Journal of Minerals, Metallurgy and Materials 2025, 58 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12613-024-3047-9
- Mark U. Simoni, Jonna Ljunge, Daniel B. Müller. Seven principles for monitoring the physical economy. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 2025, 212 , 107902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.107902
Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.
Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.
The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.
Recommended Articles
Abstract
Figure 1
Figure 1. Simplified material flow analysis (MFA) system of the global mineral material cycle. Material flows (arrows) connect material transformation, transport, market, and storage processes (blue boxes) with or without material stocks (white boxes). Highlights in red identify three key issues that require mass-balance-consistent mineral information: geological stock accounting (section 3), monitoring of mine production (section 4), and physical systems integration (sections 5 and 6).
Figure 2
Figure 2. Different approaches for geological stock accounting: (a) reserves included as fixed stocks within the system boundary; (b) exploration interpreted as a (in)flow of material; (c) geosphere excluded from the system boundary; (d) multidimensional and mass-balance (MB)-consistent geological stock model. Approaches (a) and (b) violate material flow analysis (MFA) principles, (c) is permissible but uninformative, and (d) is the spatiotemporally explicit conceptual approach.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Physical monitoring of mine production. (a) Mine planning: The natural characteristics of mineral deposits such as depth and ore grade, combined with mine design and operating efficiency, determine the expected (ex-ante) material flows. Figure not to scale, modified after ref (163). (b) Material flows and sustainability: Material flows of mining are interlinked with environmental, social, and governance (ESG) issues and tracking them is thus crucial for the Social License to Operate (SLO) and Sustainable Development License to Operate (SDLO). (c) Reference system for physical monitoring: A standardized material flow analysis (MFA) system definition with explicit reference points and a mutually agreed-upon terminology facilitates systematic reporting and enables mass-balance-consistent monitoring of mine production flows.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Multidimensional geological stock accounting illustrated as a cube with 27 voxels at three reference points (t0, t1, t2). (a) Geological stock accounting monitors changes of the physical domain over time and shows historical extraction as a measured reduction of the total stock S by 0.5 voxels from 27 → 26.5 during t0 → t1 and anticipated further reduction 26.5 → 26 during t1 → t2, assuming stock scenario S1. Exploration activity changes only the attributes (e.g., ore grade) and associated uncertainty of the geological stock characterization (2 voxels from 0% → 25–50% confidence during t0 → t1, and from 25 to 50% →>75% during t1 → t2, assuming stock scenario S1). (b) Resource classification acts as a filter domain that selectively appraises parts of the geological stock to report reserves and resources, while omitting the rest of the geological stock including known but low grade (barren) voxels; Individual geological stock voxels may remain physically unchanged but may nevertheless be reclassified as time passes (1 resources to 1 reserves during t0 → t1) or vice versa (1 reserves to 1 resources during t1 → t2 assuming resource classification scenario S1,ii(t2)). (c) Uncertainty attribution is considered as two separate steps: step c[a] addresses solely the uncertainty of the physical attributes for stock quantification; step c[b] incorporates the additional uncertainty of socioeconomic assumptions of resource classification. Color hue (red, green, blue) represents three ore grade classes relative to average crustal abundance (depleted, average to low grade, enriched); color saturation (0–25, 25–50, 50–75, 75–100) shows the confidence in the results (unknown to complete knowledge). MB, mass-balance.
Figure 5
Figure 5. (a) Today’s information flows on nonrenewable mineral resources result in incomplete, fragmented, and inconsistent knowledge that is unsuitable for addressing systemic issues related to sustainable resource management. (b) The proposed monitoring of physical systems is based on an Open Government Data (OGD) framework that supports multidimensional geodata integration, mass-balance (MB) consistent geological stock accounting, and spatiotemporally explicit material systems governance. PPP: Public-Private Partnership; SLO: Social License to Operate; SDLO: Sustainable Development License to Operate; GSO: Geological Survey Organization; EO: Earth Observation; IoT: Internet of Things; BIM/CIM: Building/City Information Modeling; ML: Machine Learning; AI Artificial Intelligence; AR/VR: Augmented/Virtual Reality; G2B, G2G, B2B, B2G: Government-to-Business data sharing, etc.
References
This article references 306 other publications.
- 1Smith, A. The Wealth of Nations; J. M. Dent & Sons LTD: London, 1776; Vol. 1.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 2Solow, R. M. Is the End of the World at Hand?. Challenge 1973, 16 (1), 39– 50, DOI: 10.1080/05775132.1973.11469961There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 3Stiglitz, J. E. Growth with Exhaustible Natural Resources: Efficient and Optimal Growth Paths. Symposium on the economics of exhaustible resources 1974, 41, 123– 137, DOI: 10.2307/2296377There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 4Tilton, J. E.; Crowson, P. C. F.; DeYoung, J. H.; Eggert, R. G.; Ericsson, M.; Guzmán, J. I.; Humphreys, D.; Lagos, G.; Maxwell, P.; Radetzki, M.; Singer, D. A.; Wellmer, F.-W. Public policy and future mineral supplies. Resour. Policy 2018, 57, 55– 60, DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2018.01.006There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 5Castillo, E.; Eggert, R. Reconciling Diverging Views on Mineral Depletion: A Modified Cumulative Availability Curve Applied to Copper Resources. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2020, 161, 104896, DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104896There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 6Beckerman, W. Economists, Scientists, and Environmental Catastrophe. Oxford Econ. Pap. 1972, 24 (3), 327– 44, DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.oep.a041225There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 7Adelman, M. A. Mineral Depletion, with Special Reference to Petroleum. Rev. Econ. Statist. 1990, 72 (1), 1– 10, DOI: 10.2307/2109733There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 8Krausmann, F.; Lauk, C.; Haas, W.; Wiedenhofer, D. From resource extraction to outflows of wastes and emissions: The socioeconomic metabolism of the global economy, 1900–2015. Global Environ. Change 2018, 52, 131– 140, DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.07.0038https://chemport.cas.org/services/resolver?origin=ACS&resolution=options&coi=1%3ACAS%3A280%3ADC%252BB3cjltVOktw%253D%253D&md5=6c4f56838db3db3f29ac058c0bfa1ce5From resource extraction to outflows of wastes and emissions: The socioeconomic metabolism of the global economy, 1900-2015Krausmann Fridolin; Lauk Christian; Haas Willi; Wiedenhofer DominikGlobal environmental change : human and policy dimensions (2018), 52 (), 131-140 ISSN:0959-3780.The size and structure of the socioeconomic metabolism are key for the planet's sustainability. In this article, we provide a consistent assessment of the development of material flows through the global economy in the period 1900-2015 using material flow accounting in combination with results from dynamic stock-flow modelling. Based on this approach, we can trace materials from extraction to their use, their accumulation in in-use stocks and finally to outflows of wastes and emissions and provide a comprehensive picture of the evolution of societies metabolism during global industrialization. This enables outlooks on inflows and outflows, which environmental policy makers require for pursuing strategies towards a more sustainable resource use. Over the whole time period, we observe a growth in global material extraction by a factor of 12 to 89 Gt/yr. A shift from materials for dissipative use to stock building materials resulted in a massive increase of in-use stocks of materials to 961 Gt in 2015. Since materials increasingly accumulate in stocks, outflows of wastes are growing at a slower pace than inputs. In 2015, outflows amounted to 58 Gt/yr, of which 35% were solid wastes and 25% emissions, the reminder being excrements, dissipative use and water vapor. Our results indicate a significant acceleration of global material flows since the beginning of the 21(st) century. We show that this acceleration, which took off in 2002, was not a short-term phenomenon but continues since more than a decade. Between 2002 and 2015, global material extraction increased by 53% in spite of the 2008 economic crisis. Based on detailed data on material stocks and flows and information on their long-term historic development, we make a rough estimate of what a global convergence of metabolic patterns at the current level in industrialized countries paired with a continuation of past efficiency gains might imply for global material demand. We find that in such a scenario until 2050 average global metabolic rates double to 22 t/cap/yr and material extraction increases to around 218 Gt/yr. Overall the analysis indicates a grand challenge calling for urgent action, fostering a continuous and considerable reduction of material flows to acceptable levels.
- 9Stuermer, M. 150 years of boom and bust: what drives mineral commodity prices?. Macroecon. Dynam. 2018, 22 (03), 702– 717, DOI: 10.1017/S136510051600050XThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 10Stuermer, M. Non-renewable resource extraction over the long term: empirical evidence from global copper production. Miner. Econ. 2022, 35 (3), 617– 625, DOI: 10.1007/s13563-022-00352-0There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 11Wellmer, F.-W. What we have learned from the past and how we should look forward. Miner. Econ. 2022, 35 (3), 765– 795, DOI: 10.1007/s13563-021-00296-xThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 12Pooley, G.; Tupy, M. Simon Abundance Index: A New Way to Measure Availability of Resources; Policy Analysis Number 857; Cato Institute, 2018.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 13Malthus, T. R. An Essay on the Principle of Population, As It Affects the Future Improvement of Society; J. Johnson in St Paul’s Church-yard: London, 1798; Vol. 1.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 14Jevons, W. S. The Coal Question: An Inquiry Concerning the Progress of the Nation and the Probable Exhaustion of Our Coal-Mines; Macmillan and Co.: London, 1865.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 15Hubbert, M. K. Nuclear energy and the fossil fuels. In Drilling and Production Practice; American Petroleum Institute: San Antonio, TX, 1956; p 40.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 16Meadows, D. H.; Meadows, D. L.; Randers, J.; Behrens, I. I. I.; W, W. The Limits to Growth: A Report for the Club of Rome’s Project on the Predicament of Mankind; Universe Books: New York, 1972.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 17Georgescu-Roegen, N. Energy and economic myths. Southern Econ. J. 1975, 41, 347– 381, DOI: 10.2307/1056148There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 18Daly, H. E. Reply to Solow/Stiglitz. Ecological Economics 1997, 22 (3), 271– 273, DOI: 10.1016/S0921-8009(97)00086-4There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 19Lawn, P. On the Ehrlich-Simon bet: Both were unskilled and Simon was lucky. Ecological Economics 2010, 69 (11), 2045– 2046, DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.07.009There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 20Wellmer, F.-W. Geology and Mining: A Symbiotic Cooperation?!. Mining 2022, 2 (2), 402– 424, DOI: 10.3390/mining2020021There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 21Global Material Resources Outlook to 2060 - Economic Drivers and Environmental Consequences In Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Paris; OECD, 2019; p 212.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 22Global Resources Outlook 2019: Natural Resources for the Future We Want; United Nations Environment Programme, International Resource Panel: Paris, 2019; DTI/2226/NA.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 23Northey, S.; Mohr, S.; Mudd, G. M.; Weng, Z.; Giurco, D. Modelling future copper ore grade decline based on a detailed assessment of copper resources and mining. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2014, 83, 190– 201, DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.10.005There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 24Calvo, G.; Mudd, G.; Valero, A.; Valero, A. Decreasing Ore Grades in Global Metallic Mining: A Theoretical Issue or a Global Reality?. Resources 2016, 5 (4), 36, DOI: 10.3390/resources5040036There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 25Conde, M. Resistance to Mining. A Review. Ecological Economics 2017, 132, 80– 90, DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.08.025There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 26Andrews, T.; Gamu, J.; Billon, P. L.; Oh, C. H.; Reyes, D.; Shin, J. Role of Host Governments in Enabling or Preventing Conflict Associated with Mining, Full-length version; United Nations Development Programme: New York, 2018.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 27The IPBES Assessment Report on Land Degradation and Restoration; Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES): Bonn, Germany, 2018. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3237392 .There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 28Rötzer, N.; Schmidt, M. Historical, Current, and Future Energy Demand from Global Copper Production and Its Impact on Climate Change. Resources 2020, 9 (4), 44, DOI: 10.3390/resources9040044There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 29Luckeneder, S.; Giljum, S.; Schaffartzik, A.; Maus, V.; Tost, M. Surge in global metal mining threatens vulnerable ecosystems. Global Environ. Change 2021, 69, 102303, DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102303There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 30Turner, G. Is Global Collapse Imminent? An Updated Comparison of the Limits to Growth with Historical Data; Melbourne Sustainable Society Institute, The University of Melbourne: 2014.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 31Steffen, W.; Broadgate, W.; Deutsch, L.; Gaffney, O.; Ludwig, C. The trajectory of the Anthropocene: The Great Acceleration. Anthropocene Review 2015, 2 (1), 81– 98, DOI: 10.1177/2053019614564785There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 32Northey, S. A.; Mudd, G. M.; Werner, T. T.; Jowitt, S. M.; Haque, N.; Yellishetty, M.; Weng, Z. The exposure of global base metal resources to water criticality, scarcity and climate change. Global Environ. Change 2017, 44, 109– 124, DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.04.004There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 33Savinova, E.; Evans, C.; Lebre, E.; Stringer, M.; Azadi, M.; Valenta, R.K. Will global cobalt supply meet demand? The geological, mineral processing, production and geographic risk profile of cobalt. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2023, 190, 106855, DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.10685533https://chemport.cas.org/services/resolver?origin=ACS&resolution=options&coi=1%3ACAS%3A528%3ADC%252BB3sXns12rsA%253D%253D&md5=acc603584a796c4f9348a6fe813f12a0Will global cobalt supply meet demand? The geological, mineral processing, production and geographic risk profile of cobaltSavinova, E.; Evans, C.; Lebre, E.; Stringer, M.; Azadi, M.; Valenta, R. K.Resources, Conservation and Recycling (2023), 190 (), 106855CODEN: RCREEW; ISSN:0921-3449. (Elsevier B.V.)Cobalt prodn. is essential in supporting energy storage and electrification initiatives in the global transition to a low-carbon economy. The main aspects of cobalt prodn. are examd. through assessment of global demand and supply, the common geol. settings and mineral processing routes, and the assocd. situated environmental, social and governance (ESG) risk factors. The supply risk of cobalt is high, owing to its primary extn. as a byproduct during copper and nickel prodn. from several deposit types. Concurrent ESG risks create addnl. complexity at the development and operational stages. The immediate forecast trend is an increase in global demand for cobalt accommodated by a corresponding increase in the prodn. However, reducing the supply risk and mitigating the complexity of the ESG dimensions of currently undeveloped ore sources is key for sustainable metal prodn. Future cobalt projects' concurrent and innate interaction with different risk factors can only be managed if changes to mining operations are made, together with regulation of artisanal mining and reprocessing of mine waste streams for cobalt.
- 34Lusty, P. A. J.; Gunn, A. G. Challenges to global mineral resource security and options for future supply. Geological Society, London, Special Publications 2015, 393 (1), 265– 276, DOI: 10.1144/SP393.13There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 35Calvo, G.; Valero, A.; Valero, A. Assessing maximum production peak and resource availability of non-fuel mineral resources: Analyzing the influence of extractable global resources. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2017, 125, 208– 217, DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.06.009There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 36Turcheniuk, K.; Bondarev, D.; Singhal, V.; Yushin, G. Ten years left to redesign lithium-ion batteries. Nature 2018, 559 (7715), 467– 470, DOI: 10.1038/d41586-018-05752-336https://chemport.cas.org/services/resolver?origin=ACS&resolution=options&coi=1%3ACAS%3A528%3ADC%252BC1cXhtl2jt7rE&md5=ebdbc213601904e85550c1388b0437abTen years left to redesign lithium-ion batteriesTurcheniuk, Kostiantyn; Bondarev, Dmitry; Singhal, Vinod; Yushin, GlebNature (London, United Kingdom) (2018), 559 (7715), 467-470CODEN: NATUAS; ISSN:0028-0836. (Nature Research)Reserves of cobalt and nickel used in elec.-vehicle cells will not meet future demand. Refocus research to find new electrodes based on common elements such as iron and silicon, urge Kostiantyn Turcheniuk and colleagues.
- 37Schmidt, M. Scarcity and Environmental Impact of Mineral Resources─An Old and Never-Ending Discussion. Resources 2019, 8 (1), 2, DOI: 10.3390/resources8010002There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 38Henckens, T. Scarce mineral resources: Extraction, consumption and limits of sustainability. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2021, 169, 105511, DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.10551138https://chemport.cas.org/services/resolver?origin=ACS&resolution=options&coi=1%3ACAS%3A528%3ADC%252BB38XhvVCitbjF&md5=b00a47dde761b3ec50431271b50c655cScarce mineral resources: Extraction, consumption and limits of sustainabilityHenckens, TheoResources, Conservation and Recycling (2021), 169 (), 105511CODEN: RCREEW; ISSN:0921-3449. (Elsevier B.V.)The interests of the current and future generations concerning the access to and the use of geol. scarce mineral resources diverge. This article explores whether this apparent irreconcilability can be resolved. It is investigated how far the extn. rate of thirteen scarce raw materials can be reduced while simultaneously increasing the services they provide worldwide to the level prevailing in developed countries in 2020. The scarce raw materials considered are antimony, bismuth, boron, chromium, copper, gold, indium, molybdenum, nickel, silver, tin, tungsten, and zinc. Indicative ests. of how long these mineral resources will be available for humanity are calcd., assuming (1)the world population stabilizes at ten billion people, (2) the global service level of these resources attains that prevailing in developed countries in 2020 and (3) max. resource-saving measures are taken. The conclusion is that immediate implementation of the most stringent resource-saving measures could extend the estd. exhaustion periods of most of the scarcest raw materials by an av. factor of approx. four, even while simultaneously increasing the global service level of these resources by a factor four as well. Without sufficient and adequate resource saving measures it will be difficult or impossible for a substantial part of the future world population to attain the service level of mineral resources prevailing in developed countries at this moment. Moreover, without such measures, the period of time that future citizens of rich countries can continue enjoying the current service level of some of the scarcest mineral resources in their countries, will be severely limited.
- 39Sverdrup, H. U.; Olafsdottir, A. H.; Ragnarsdottir, K. V. Development of a Biophysical Economics Module for the Global Integrated Assessment Model WORLD7. In Feedback Economics: Economic Modeling with System Dynamics; Cavana, R. Y., Dangerfield, B. C., Pavlov, O. V., Radzicki, M. J., Wheat, I. D., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, 2021; pp 247– 283.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 40Nassar, N. T.; Lederer, G. W.; Brainard, J. L.; Padilla, A. J.; Lessard, J. D. Rock-to-Metal Ratio: A Foundational Metric for Understanding Mine Wastes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022, 56 (10), 6710– 6721, DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.1c0787540https://chemport.cas.org/services/resolver?origin=ACS&resolution=options&coi=1%3ACAS%3A528%3ADC%252BB38XhtVKnu7rE&md5=d8925e94325a3d31344e8314ea7072aaRock-to-Metal Ratio: A Foundational Metric for Understanding Mine WastesNassar, Nedal T.; Lederer, Graham W.; Brainard, Jamie L.; Padilla, Abraham J.; Lessard, Joseph D.Environmental Science & Technology (2022), 56 (10), 6710-6721CODEN: ESTHAG; ISSN:1520-5851. (American Chemical Society)The quantity of ore mined and waste rock (i.e., overburden or barren rock) removed to produce a refined unit of a mineral commodity, its rock-to-metal ratio (RMR), is an important metric for understanding mine wastes and environmental burdens. In this anal., we provide a comprehensive examn. of RMRs for 25 commodities for 2018. The results indicate significant variability across commodities. Precious metals like gold have RMRs in the range of 105-106, while iron ore and aluminum are on the order of 101. The results also indicate significant variability across operations for a single commodity. The interquartile range of RMRs for individual cobalt operations, for example, varies from 465 to 2157, with a global RMR of 859. RMR variability is mainly driven by ore grades and revenue contribution. The total attributable ore mined and waste rock removed in the prodn. of these 25 commodities sums to 37.6 billion metric tons, 83% of which is attributable to iron ore, copper, and gold. RMRs provide an addnl. dimension for evaluating the impact of materials and material choice trade-offs. The results can enhance life cycle inventories and be extended to evaluate areas of surface disturbances, mine tailings, energy requirements, and assocd. greenhouse gas emissions.
- 41Bide, T.; Brown, T. J.; Gunn, A. G.; Deady, E. Development of decision-making tools to create a harmonised UK national mineral resource inventory using the United Nations Framework Classification. Resources Polym. 2022, 76, 102558, DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102558There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 42Jorgensen, L. F.; Wittenberg, A.; Deady, E.; Kumelj, Š.; Tulstrup, J. European mineral intelligence - collecting, harmonizing and sharing data on European raw materials. Geological Society, London, Special Publications 2023, 526 (1), 51– 67, DOI: 10.1144/SP526-2022-179There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 43Graedel, T. E.; Barr, R.; Cordier, D.; Enriquez, M.; Hagelüken, C.; Hammond, N. Q.; Kesler, S.; Mudd, G.; Nassar, N.; Peacey, J.; Reck, B. K.; Robb, L.; Skinner, B. J.; Turnbull, I.; Santos, R. V.; Wall, F.; Wittmer, D. Estimating Long-Run Geological Stocks of Metals; Working Group on Geological Stocks of Metals, UNEP International Panel on Sustainable Resource Management: Paris, 2011.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 44Wellmer, F. W.; Scholz, R. W. Peak minerals: What can we learn from the history of mineral economics and the cases of gold and phosphorus?. Miner. Econ. 2017, 30 (2), 73– 93, DOI: 10.1007/s13563-016-0094-3There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 45Weber, L.; Reichl, C. Mineral statistics─useful tool or needless exercise?. Mineral economics: raw materials report 2022, 35 (3–4), 569– 586, DOI: 10.1007/s13563-022-00314-6There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 46West, J.; Lieber, M.; Lutter, S.; Schandl, H. Proposal for a new compilation system for metal ores in economy wide material flow accounting. J. Ind. Ecol. 2020, 24 (6), 1220– 1233, DOI: 10.1111/jiec.13015There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 47Northey, S. A.; Klose, S.; Pauliuk, S.; Yellishetty, M.; Giurco, D. Primary Exploration, Mining and Metal Supply Scenario (PEMMSS) model: Towards a stochastic understanding of the mineral discovery, mine development and co-product recovery requirements to meet demand in a low-carbon future. Resources, Conservation & Recycling Advances 2023, 17, 200137, DOI: 10.1016/j.rcradv.2023.200137There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 48Singer, D. A. Comparison of expert estimates of number of undiscovered mineral deposits with mineral deposit densities. Ore Geol. Rev. 2018, 99, 235– 243, DOI: 10.1016/j.oregeorev.2018.06.019There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 49Mudd, G. M.; Jowitt, S. M. The New Century for Nickel Resources, Reserves, and Mining: Reassessing the Sustainability of the Devil’s Metal. Econ. Geol. 2022, 117 (8), 1961– 1983, DOI: 10.5382/econgeo.4950There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 50Mudd, G. M.; Jowitt, S. M.; Werner, T. T. The world’s by-product and critical metal resources part I: Uncertainties, current reporting practices, implications and grounds for optimizm. Ore Geol. Rev. 2017, 86, 924– 938, DOI: 10.1016/j.oregeorev.2016.05.001There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 51Northey, S. A.; Mudd, G. M.; Werner, T. T. Unresolved Complexity in Assessments of Mineral Resource Depletion and Availability. Nat. Resour. Res. 2018, 27 (2), 241– 255, DOI: 10.1007/s11053-017-9352-551https://chemport.cas.org/services/resolver?origin=ACS&resolution=options&coi=1%3ACAS%3A528%3ADC%252BC2sXht1ekt7jL&md5=c738969548b5ffa58691e6bbecf1ea0cUnresolved Complexity in Assessments of Mineral Resource Depletion and AvailabilityNorthey, Stephen A.; Mudd, Gavin M.; Werner, T. T.Natural Resources Research (Dordrecht, Netherlands) (2018), 27 (2), 241-255CODEN: NRREFQ; ISSN:1520-7439. (Springer)A review. Considerations of mineral resource availability and depletion form part of a diverse array of sustainable development-oriented studies, across domains such as resource criticality, life cycle assessment and material flow anal. Given the multidisciplinary nature of these studies, it is important that a common understanding of the complexity and nuances of mineral supply chains be developed. In this paper, we provide a brief overview of these assessment approaches and expand on several areas that are conceptually difficult to account for in these studies. These include the dynamic nature of relationships between reserves, resources, cut-off grades and ore grades; the ability to account for local economic, social and environmental factors when performing global assessments; and the role that technol. improvements play in increasing the availability of economically extractable mineral resources. Advancing knowledge in these areas may further enhance the sophistication and interpretation of studies that assess mineral resource depletion or availability.
- 52Simoni, M. U.; Aslaksen Aasly, K.; Eilu, P.; Schjødt, F. Mintell4 EU Deliverable D4.1. Case Study Review with Guidance and Examples for Applying the UNFC to European Mineral Resources; Geological Survey of Norway (NGU): Trondheim, Norway, 2021.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 53Sustainability Reporting in the Mining Sector - Current Status and Future Trends; United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP): Nairobi, Kenya, 2020.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 54Lebre, E.; Owen, J. R.; Kemp, D.; Valenta, R. K. Complex orebodies and future global metal supply: An introduction. Resour. Policy 2022, 77, 102696, DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102696There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 55Sala, S.; Ciuffo, B.; Nijkamp, P. A systemic framework for sustainability assessment. Ecological Economics 2015, 119, 314– 325, DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.09.015There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 56Gorman, M. R.; Dzombak, D. A. A review of sustainable mining and resource management: Transitioning from the life cycle of the mine to the life cycle of the mineral. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2018, 137, 281– 291, DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.06.001There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 57Schandl, H.; Müller, D. B.; Moriguchi, Y. Socioeconomic Metabolism Takes the Stage in the International Environmental Policy Debate: A Special Issue to Review Research Progress and Policy Impacts. J. Ind. Ecol. 2015, 19 (5), 689– 694, DOI: 10.1111/jiec.12357There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 58Turner, G. M.; Poldy, F. Let’s Get Physical: Creating a Stocks and Flows View of the Australian Economy. In MODSIM 2001, Canberra, Australia, 2001; pp 1637– 1642.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 59Forrester, J. W. Industrial Dynamics. A major breakthrough for decision makers. Harvard Bus. Rev. 1958, 36 (4), 37– 66There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 60Fischer-Kowalski, M. Society’s Metabolism - The Intellectual History of Materials Flow Analysis, Part I, 1860–1970. J. Ind. Ecol. 1998, 2 (1), 61– 78, DOI: 10.1162/jiec.1998.2.1.61There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 61Ayres, R. U. Industrial metabolism. In Technology and Environment, Ausubel, J. H., Sladovich, H. E., Eds. The National Academies Press: Washington, D..C., 1989; Vol. 1989, pp 23– 49.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 62Frosch, R. A.; Gallopoulos, N. E. Strategies for manufacturing. Sci. Am. 1989, 261 (3), 144– 152, DOI: 10.1038/scientificamerican0989-144There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 63Graedel, T. E.; Allenby, B. R.; Telephone, A.; Company, T. Industrial Ecology; Prentice Hall, 1995.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 64Sterman, J. D. Business Dynamics; McGraw-Hill, 2000.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 65Ghisellini, P.; Cialani, C.; Ulgiati, S. A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 114, 11– 32, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 66Haberl, H.; Wiedenhofer, D.; Pauliuk, S.; Krausmann, F.; Müller, D. B.; Fischer-Kowalski, M. Contributions of sociometabolic research to sustainability science. Nat. Sustainability 2019, 2 (3), 173– 184, DOI: 10.1038/s41893-019-0225-2There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 67Ayres, R. U.; Kneese, A. V. Production, consumption, and externalities. Am. Econ. Rev. 1969, 59 (3), 282– 297There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 68Baccini, P.; Brunner, P. H. Metabolism of the Anthroposphere; Springer: Berlin; New York, 1991.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 69Brunner, P. H.; Rechberger, H. Practical Handbook of Material Flow Analysis; CRC Press/LewisPublishers: Boca Raton, FL, 2004.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 70Brunner, P. H.; Rechberger, H. Practical Handbook of Material Flow Analysis: For Environmental, Resource, and Waste Engineers, 2nd ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, 2017.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 71Cullen, J. M.; Cooper, D. R. Material Flows and Efficiency. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 2022, 52 (1), 525– 559, DOI: 10.1146/annurev-matsci-070218-12590371https://chemport.cas.org/services/resolver?origin=ACS&resolution=options&coi=1%3ACAS%3A528%3ADC%252BB38Xht1Shtb3L&md5=4a8608317399d58b0c25cb2dc627d8c8Material Flows and EfficiencyCullen, Jonathan M.; Cooper, Daniel R.Annual Review of Materials Research (2022), 52 (), 525-559CODEN: ARMRCU; ISSN:1531-7331. (Annual Reviews)Attempts to track material flows and the calcn. of efficiency for material systems go hand in hand. Questions of where materials come from, where materials go to, and how much material is lost along the way are embedded in human societies. This article reviews material flows, their anal., and progress toward material efficiency. We focus first on material flow anal. (MFA) and the three key tenets of any MFA: presentation of materials, visualization of the flow structure, and insight derived from anal. Reviewing recent literature, we explore how each of these concepts is described, organized, and presented in MFA studies. We go on to show the role of MFA in material efficiency calcns. and what-if scenario anal. for informed decision-making. We investigate the origins and motivations behind the material efficiency paradigm and the key efficiency strategies and practices developed in recent years and conclude by suggesting priorities for a future research agenda.
- 72de Lavoisier, A.-L. Traité Élémentaire de Chimie; Chez Cuchet, libraire: Paris, 1789; Vol. 1.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 73Martins, R. A priori components of science: Lavoisier and the law of conservation of mass in chemical reactions. In Studies in History and Philosophy of Science II; Quamcumque Editum, 2021; pp 5– 71.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 74Hartig, G. L. Anweisung zur Taxation der Forste, oder zur Bestimmung des Holzertrags der Wälder; Heyer: Giessen, 1795.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 75Kurth, H.; Gerold, D.; Ulbricht, R. Forsteinrichtung: Nachhaltige Regelung des Waldes. DLV-Verlag: Berlin, 1994.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 76Müller, D. B.; Bader, H.-P.; Baccini, P. Long-term Coordination of Timber Production and Consumption Using a Dynamic Material and Energy Flow Analysis. J. Ind. Ecol. 2004, 8 (3), 65– 88, DOI: 10.1162/1088198042442342There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 77Anonymous. Mass-Balance Terms. J. Glaciol. 1969, 8 (52), 3– 7. DOI: 10.3189/S0022143000020736There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 78Cogley, J. G. Mass-balance terms revisited. J. Glaciol. 2010, 56 (200), 997– 1001, DOI: 10.3189/002214311796406040There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 79Mellor, M. Mass balance studies in Antarctica. J. Glaciol. 1959, 3 (26), 522– 533, DOI: 10.3189/S0022143000017275There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 80Korzoun, V. I. World Water Balance and Water Resources of the Earth; USSR Committee for the International Hydrological Decade: Paris, 1978.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 81Aeschbach-Hertig, W.; Gleeson, T. Regional strategies for the accelerating global problem of groundwater depletion. Nat. Geosci. 2012, 5 (12), 853– 861, DOI: 10.1038/ngeo161781https://chemport.cas.org/services/resolver?origin=ACS&resolution=options&coi=1%3ACAS%3A528%3ADC%252BC38Xhs1ymt7zO&md5=08d8faae9b2eb73c70bb67155645c3f4Regional strategies for the accelerating global problem of groundwater depletionAeschbach-Hertig, Werner; Gleeson, TomNature Geoscience (2012), 5 (12), 853-861CODEN: NGAEBU; ISSN:1752-0894. (Nature Publishing Group)Groundwater-the world's largest freshwater resource-is critically important for irrigated agriculture and hence for global food security. Yet depletion is widespread in large groundwater systems in both semi-arid and humid regions of the world. Excessive extn. for irrigation where groundwater is slowly renewed is the main cause of the depletion, and climate change has the potential to exacerbate the problem in some regions. Globally aggregated groundwater depletion contributes to sea-level rise, and has accelerated markedly since the mid-twentieth century. But its impacts on water resources are more obvious at the regional scale, for example in agriculturally important parts of India, China and the United States. Food prodn. in such regions can only be made sustainable in the long term if groundwater levels are stabilized. To this end, a transformation is required in how we value, manage and characterize groundwater systems. Tech. approaches-such as water diversion, artificial groundwater recharge and efficient irrigation-have failed to balance regional groundwater budgets. They need to be complemented by more comprehensive strategies that are adapted to the specific social, economic, political and environmental settings of each region.
- 82Peters-Lidard, C. D.; Hossain, F.; Leung, L. R.; McDowell, N.; Rodell, M.; Tapiador, F. J.; Turk, F. J.; Wood, A. 100 Years of Progress in Hydrology. Meteorological Monographs 2018, 59, 25.1– 25.51, DOI: 10.1175/AMSMONOGRAPHS-D-18-0019.1There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 83Le Quéré, C.; Andrew, R. M.; Canadell, J. G.; Sitch, S.; Korsbakken, J. I.; Peters, G. P.; Manning, A. C.; Boden, T. A.; Tans, P. P.; Houghton, R. A.; Keeling, R. F.; Alin, S.; Andrews, O. D.; Anthoni, P.; Barbero, L.; Bopp, L.; Chevallier, F.; Chini, L. P.; Ciais, P.; Currie, K.; Delire, C.; Doney, S. C.; Friedlingstein, P.; Gkritzalis, T.; Harris, I.; Hauck, J.; Haverd, V.; Hoppema, M.; Klein Goldewijk, K.; Jain, A. K.; Kato, E.; Körtzinger, A.; Landschützer, P.; Lefèvre, N.; Lenton, A.; Lienert, S.; Lombardozzi, D.; Melton, J. R.; Metzl, N.; Millero, F.; Monteiro, P. M. S.; Munro, D. R.; Nabel, J. E. M. S.; Nakaoka, S.; O’Brien, K.; Olsen, A.; Omar, A. M.; Ono, T.; Pierrot, D.; Poulter, B.; Rödenbeck, C.; Salisbury, J.; Schuster, U.; Schwinger, J.; Séférian, R.; Skjelvan, I.; Stocker, B. D.; Sutton, A. J.; Takahashi, T.; Tian, H.; Tilbrook, B.; van der Laan-Luijkx, I. T.; van der Werf, G. R.; Viovy, N.; Walker, A. P.; Wiltshire, A. J.; Zaehle, S. Global Carbon Budget 2016. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 2016, 8 (2), 605– 649, DOI: 10.5194/essd-8-605-2016There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 84Wiese, D. N.; Bienstock, B.; Blackwood, C.; Chrone, J.; Loomis, B. D.; Sauber, J.; Rodell, M.; Baize, R.; Bearden, D.; Case, K.; Horner, S.; Luthcke, S.; Reager, J. T.; Srinivasan, M.; Tsaoussi, L.; Webb, F.; Whitehurst, A.; Zlotnicki, V. The Mass Change Designated Observable Study: Overview and Results. Earth Space Sci. 2022, 9 (8), e2022EA002311 DOI: 10.1029/2022EA002311There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 85Lyell, C. Principles of Geology: Being an Inquiry how Far the Former Changes of the Earth’s Surface are Referable to Causes Now in Operation; John Murray: London, 1830; Vol. 1.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 86Rudwick, M. J. S. The Strategy of Lyell’s Principles of Geology. Isis 1970, 61 (1), 5– 33, DOI: 10.1086/350576There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 87Syvitski, J.; Ángel, J. R.; Saito, Y.; Overeem, I.; Vörösmarty, C. J.; Wang, H.; Olago, D. Earth’s sediment cycle during the Anthropocene. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 2022, 3 (3), 179– 196, DOI: 10.1038/s43017-021-00253-wThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 88Odeh, A. S. Reservoir Simulation···What Is It. J. Pet. Technol. 1969, 21 (11), 1383– 1388, DOI: 10.2118/2790-PAThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 89Magoon, L. B.; Dow, W. G. The Petroleum System─From Source to Trap. AAPG Memoir 1994, 60, 3– 24, DOI: 10.1306/M60585C1There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 90Wiegel, R. L. Advances in mineral processing material balances. Can. Metall. Q. 1972, 11 (2), 413– 424, DOI: 10.1179/cmq.1972.11.2.413There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 91Hodouin, D. Methods for automatic control, observation, and optimization in mineral processing plants. Journal of Process Control 2011, 21 (2), 211– 225, DOI: 10.1016/j.jprocont.2010.10.01691https://chemport.cas.org/services/resolver?origin=ACS&resolution=options&coi=1%3ACAS%3A528%3ADC%252BC3MXitFejs7w%253D&md5=8eb0815de1c4bbe89e98ae2595408d4fMethods for automatic control, observation, and optimization in mineral processing plantsHodouin, DanielJournal of Process Control (2011), 21 (2), 211-225CODEN: JPCOEO; ISSN:0959-1524. (Elsevier Ltd.)For controlling strongly disturbed, poorly modeled, and difficult to measure processes, such as those involved in the mineral processing industry, the peripheral tools of the control loop (fault detection and isolation system, data reconciliation procedure, observers, soft sensors, optimizers, model parameter tuners) are as important as the controller itself. The paper briefly describes each element of this generalized control loop, while putting emphasis on mineral processing specific cases.
- 92Wolman, A. The Metabolism of Cities. Sci. Am. 1965, 213 (3), 178– 193, DOI: 10.1038/scientificamerican0965-178There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 93Kennedy, C.; Pincetl, S.; Bunje, P. The study of urban metabolism and its applications to urban planning and design. Environ. Pollut. 2011, 159 (8), 1965– 1973, DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2010.10.02293https://chemport.cas.org/services/resolver?origin=ACS&resolution=options&coi=1%3ACAS%3A528%3ADC%252BC3MXnsVyluro%253D&md5=665b415812f4eb17ade33aabf729ab72The study of urban metabolism and its applications to urban planning and designKennedy, C.; Pincetl, S.; Bunje, P.Environmental Pollution (Oxford, United Kingdom) (2011), 159 (8-9), 1965-1973CODEN: ENPOEK; ISSN:0269-7491. (Elsevier Ltd.)Following formative work in the 1970s, disappearance in the 1980s, and reemergence in the 1990s, a chronol. review shows that the past decade has witnessed increasing interest in the study of urban metab. The review finds that there are two related, non-conflicting, schools of urban metab.: one following Odum describes metab. in terms of energy equiv.; while the second more broadly expresses a city's flows of water, materials and nutrients in terms of mass fluxes. Four example applications of urban metab. studies are discussed: urban sustainability indicators; inputs to urban greenhouse gas emissions calcn.; math. models of urban metab. for policy anal.; and as a basis for sustainable urban design. Future directions include fuller integration of social, health and economic indicators into the urban metab. framework, while tackling the great sustainability challenge of reconstructing cities. This paper presents a chronol. review of urban metab. studies and highlights four areas of application.
- 94Müller, D. B.; Billy, R.; Simoni, M. U.; Petavratzi, E.; Liu, G.; Rechberger, H.; Lundhaug, M. C.; Cullen, J. M. Maps of the physical economy to inform sustainability strategies. In Handbook of Recycling, 2nd ed.; Meskers, C., Worrell, E., Reuter, M. A., Eds.; Elsevier: Waltham, USA, 2023; pp 1– 18.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 95Gonzalez Hernandez, A.; Lupton, R. C.; Williams, C.; Cullen, J. M. Control data, Sankey diagrams, and exergy: Assessing the resource efficiency of industrial plants. Appl. Energy 2018, 218, 232– 245, DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.02.181There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 96Lupton, R. C.; Allwood, J. M. Hybrid Sankey diagrams: Visual analysis of multidimensional data for understanding resource use. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2017, 124, 141– 151, DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.05.002There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 97Billy, R. G.; Monnier, L.; Nybakke, E.; Isaksen, M.; Müller, D. B. Systemic Approaches for Emission Reduction in Industrial Plants Based on Physical Accounting: Example for an Aluminum Smelter. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022, 56 (3), 1973– 1982, DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.1c0568197https://chemport.cas.org/services/resolver?origin=ACS&resolution=options&coi=1%3ACAS%3A528%3ADC%252BB38Xht1yrurc%253D&md5=e36ae5938e45e6c229cc335548e3130cSystemic Approaches for Emission Reduction in Industrial Plants Based on Physical Accounting: Example for an Aluminum SmelterBilly, Romain G.; Monnier, Louis; Nybakke, Even; Isaksen, Morten; Muller, Daniel B.Environmental Science & Technology (2022), 56 (3), 1973-1982CODEN: ESTHAG; ISSN:1520-5851. (American Chemical Society)Greenhouse gas (GHG) accounting in industrial plants usually has multiple purposes, including mandatory reporting, shareholder and stakeholder communication, developing key performance indicators (KPIs), or informing cost-effective mitigation options. Current carbon accounting systems, such as the one required by the European Union Emission Trading Scheme (EU ETS), ignore the system context in which emissions occur. This hampers the identification and evaluation of comprehensive mitigation strategies considering linkages between materials, energy, and emissions. Here, we propose a carbon accounting method based on multilevel material flow anal. (MFA), which aims at addressing this gap. Using a Norwegian primary aluminum prodn. plant as an example, we analyzed the material stocks and flows within this plant for total mass flows of goods as well as substances such as aluminum and carbon. The results show that the MFA-based accounting (i) is more robust than conventional tools due to mass balance consistency and higher granularity, (ii) allows monitoring the performance of the company and defines meaningful KPIs, (iii) can be used as a basis for the EU ETS reporting and linked to internal reporting, (iv) enables the identification and evaluation of systemic solns. and resource efficiency strategies for reducing emissions, and (v) has the potential to save costs.
- 98IAI. The Global Aluminium Cycle - Aluminium Stocks and Flows Visualization, 2023. https://alucycle.international-aluminium.org/. (accessed 14.08.2023).There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 99Torres De Matos, C.; Wittmer, D.; Mathieux, F.; Pennington, D. Revision of the Material System Analyses Specifications; JRC118827; European Commission: Luxembourg, 2020. DOI: 10.2760/374178 .There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 100Padilla, A. J.; Nassar, N. T. Dynamic material flow analysis of tantalum in the United States from 2002 to 2020. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2023, 190, 106783, DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106783100https://chemport.cas.org/services/resolver?origin=ACS&resolution=options&coi=1%3ACAS%3A528%3ADC%252BB38XivFOrsL3K&md5=2fe96d350dd254f51a85494d1d1112e0Dynamic material flow analysis of tantalum in the United States from 2002 to 2020Padilla, Abraham J.; Nassar, Nedal T.Resources, Conservation and Recycling (2023), 190 (), 106783CODEN: RCREEW; ISSN:0921-3449. (Elsevier B.V.)Tantalum has received considerable attention due to risks assocd. with its supply chain. In 2020 ∼70% of global tantalum supply originated in Africa, with 40% produced in the Democratic Republic of Congo alone. The United States has relied entirely on imports since the 1950s. However, quantifying total domestic consumption is problematic because refined tantalum compds. do not have unique tariff codes resulting in significant trade vols. not properly documented. Furthermore, tantalum incorporated into finished goods is not tracked as tantalum. Thus, ests. only capture a fraction of total consumption. We performed a material flow anal. to quantify total domestic tantalum consumption from 2002 to 2020. Our results indicate that consumption may be up to 250% more than previously estd. Our detailed results allow quantification of tantalum stocks in-use as well as coming out of use any year, providing valuable insight to industry and policymakers for addressing potential supply security issues.
- 101McCaffrey, D. M.; Nassar, N. T.; Jowitt, S. M.; Padilla, A. J.; Bird, L. R. Embedded critical material flow: The case of niobium, the United States, and China. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2023, 188, 106698, DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106698101https://chemport.cas.org/services/resolver?origin=ACS&resolution=options&coi=1%3ACAS%3A528%3ADC%252BB38Xis1Gltr3E&md5=736c86e708918c37676bd5b6e8e82029Embedded critical material flow: The case of niobium, the United States, and ChinaMcCaffrey, Dalton M.; Nassar, Nedal T.; Jowitt, Simon M.; Padilla, Abraham J.; Bird, Laurence R.Resources, Conservation and Recycling (2023), 188 (), 106698CODEN: RCREEW; ISSN:0921-3449. (Elsevier B.V.)Niobium, often classified as crit., is typically embedded within steels essential for infrastructure and transportation. Most niobium-consuming countries are import-dependent on primary stage niobium, meaning traditional material flow anal., which often excludes crit. commodities embedded within products of large-scale industries, would miss important flows in the fabrication and manufg. stages and underestimate niobium consumption. This study presents the first dynamic (2000-2020) niobium flow anal. for two niobium-consuming, net import-dependent countries: the United States (U.S.) and China. Results demonstrate that the U. S. is import-dependent throughout all stages of the niobium flow cycle including embedded and primary flows, whereas China is only import-dependent on primary niobium. Moreover, while most U. S. imports of niobium embedded within (semi-)finished goods are consumed domestically, most niobium-contg. goods manufd. in China are exported, suggesting a supply disruption would affect their economies differently. This research demonstrates the necessity of embedded flows for criticality assessments and evaluating supply restrictions.
- 102Alonso, E.; Pineault, D. G.; Gambogi, J.; Nassar, N. T. Mapping first to final uses for rare earth elements, globally and in the United States. J. Ind. Ecol. 2023, 27 (1), 312– 322, DOI: 10.1111/jiec.13354There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 103Petavratzi, E.; Gunn, G. Decarbonising the automotive sector: a primary raw material perspective on targets and timescales. Miner. Econ. 2023. 36 545 DOI: 10.1007/s13563-022-00334-2There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 104McKelvey, V. E. Mineral Resource Estimates and Public Policy: Better methods for estimating the magnitude of potential mineral resources are needed to provide the knowledge that should guide the design of many key public policies. Am. Sci. 1972, 60 (1), 32– 40There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 105Skinner, B. J. Earth resources. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1979, 76 (9), 4212– 4217, DOI: 10.1073/pnas.76.9.4212105https://chemport.cas.org/services/resolver?origin=ACS&resolution=options&coi=1%3ACAS%3A528%3ADyaE1MXmtFertLk%253D&md5=deef0196ed13ab028e3727795a109ef9Earth resourcesSkinner, Brian J.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (1979), 76 (9), 4212-17CODEN: PNASA6; ISSN:0027-8424.A review with 11 refs.
- 106Kesler, S. E. Geological Stocks and Prospects for Nonrenewable Resources. In Linkages of Sustainability; Graedel, T. E.; van der Voet, E., Eds. The MIT Press: Cambridge, Mass., 2009.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 107NEA, IAEA. Uranium 2020: Resources, Production and Demand; NEA No. 7413; OECD Publishing: Paris, 2021. DOI: 10.1787/d82388ab-en .There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 108Arndt, N. T.; Fontboté, L.; Hedenquist, J. W.; Kesler, S. E.; Thompson, J. F. H.; Wood, D. G. Metals and Minerals, Now and in The Future. Geochem. Perspect. 2017, 6 (1), 3– 17There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 109West, J. Extractable global resources and the future availability of metal stocks: “Known Unknowns” for the foreseeable future. Resour. Policy 2020, 65, 101574, DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.101574There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 110Andrews, G. C.; Shaw, P.; McPhee, J. Canadian Professional Engineering and Geoscience: Practice and Ethics, 6 ed.; Nelson: Toronto, 2019.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 111Meinert, L. D.; Robinson, G. R., Jr; Nassar, N. T. Mineral resources: Reserves, peak production and the future. Resources 2016, 5 (1), 14, DOI: 10.3390/resources5010014There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 112International Reporting Template for the Public Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves; Committee for Mineral Reserves International Reporting Standards (CRIRSCO) and International Council on Mining & Metals (ICMM): London, 2013.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 113Guidance Note on Competency Requirements for the Estimation, Classification and Management of Resources; ECE/ENERGY/GE.3/2022/4; United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, 2022.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 114IFRS. Extractive Activities - Reserve and Resource Reporting; International Accounting Standards Board (IASB), 2020.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 115Mineral Commodity Summaries 2019 - Appendix C - Reserves and Resources; U.S. Geological Survey: Reston, VA, 2023. DOI: 10.3133/mcs2023 .There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 116UNECE. United Nations Framework Classification for Resources Update 2019; ECE/ENERGY/125; United Nations Economic Commission for Europe: Geneva, Switzerland, 2019.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 117Volchko, Y.; Norrman, J.; Ericsson, L. O.; Nilsson, K. L.; Markstedt, A.; Öberg, M.; Mossmark, F.; Bobylev, N.; Tengborg, P. Subsurface planning: Towards a common understanding of the subsurface as a multifunctional resource. Land Use Policy 2020, 90, 104316, DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104316There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 118Faber, M.; Frank, K.; Klauer, B.; Manstetten, R.; Schiller, J.; Wissel, C. On the foundation of a general theory of stocks. Ecological Economics 2005, 55 (2), 155– 172, DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.06.006There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 119Pauliuk, S.; Majeau-Bettez, G.; Müller, D. B.; Hertwich, E. G. Toward a Practical Ontology for Socioeconomic Metabolism. J. Ind. Ecol. 2016, 20 (6), 1260– 1272, DOI: 10.1111/jiec.12386There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 120USGS. NADM Conceptual Model 1.0 - A Conceptual Model for Geologic Map Information; 2004–1334; U.S. Geological Survey: Reston, VA, 2004. DOI: 10.3133/ofr20041334 .There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 121Cohen, D. Earth’s natural wealth: an audit. New Scientist 2007, 194, 34– 41, 23 May 2007 DOI: 10.1016/S0262-4079(07)61315-3There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 122Zimmermann, E. W. World Resources and Industries: A Functional Appraisal of the Availability of Agricultural and Industrial Materials, revised ed.; Harper & Row: New York, 1951.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 123Mudd, G. M. Assessing the Availability of Global Metals and Minerals for the Sustainable Century: From Aluminium to Zirconium. Sustainability 2021, 13 (19), 10855, DOI: 10.3390/su131910855123https://chemport.cas.org/services/resolver?origin=ACS&resolution=options&coi=1%3ACAS%3A528%3ADC%252BB3MXis1ajsbrN&md5=5b93e73a2c12bb6e7ac80a9069c031a0Assessing the Availability of Global Metals and Minerals for the Sustainable Century: From Aluminium to ZirconiumMudd, Gavin M.Sustainability (2021), 13 (19), 10855CODEN: SUSTDE; ISSN:2071-1050. (MDPI AG)Mining supplies metals and minerals to meet the material and energy needs of the modern world. Typically, mineral resources are widely considered to be 'finite' in nature, yet, paradoxically, global prodn. and reported reserves and resources continue to grow. This paper synthesizes an extensive array of data on the long-term trends in cumulative mine prodn., reserves and resources at a global level as well detailed case studies of Australia, a global leader in many sectors of mining, and lithium, a new metal with rapidly growing demand. Overall, the paper shows that growing mine prodn. has been clearly matched by growing reserves and resources, although there are numerous complex social, environmental and governance factors which are already affecting mines and are expected to increasingly affect mining into the future. Thus it is not possible at present to det. the 'ultimately recoverable resource', esp. as this is a dynamic quantity dependent on a variety of inter-related factors (e.g., exploration, social issues, technol., market dynamics, environmental risks, governance aspects, etc.). This finding reinforces the need for continuing detailed studies of all metals and minerals to understand their individual supply and use dynamics to help modern society meet its needs and sustainable development goals.
- 124Zeng, X. Win-Win: Anthropogenic circularity for metal criticality and carbon neutrality. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering 2023, 17 (2), 23, DOI: 10.1007/s11783-023-1623-2124https://chemport.cas.org/services/resolver?origin=ACS&resolution=options&coi=1%3ACAS%3A280%3ADC%252BB287ntVWitg%253D%253D&md5=95e867cceba8585b8a9a2db7a2a9b8e7Win-Win: Anthropogenic circularity for metal criticality and carbon neutralityZeng XianlaiFrontiers of environmental science & engineering (2023), 17 (2), 23 ISSN:2095-2201.Resource depletion and environmental degradation have fueled a burgeoning discipline of anthropogenic circularity since the 2010s. It generally consists of waste reuse, remanufacturing, recycling, and recovery. Circular economy and "zero-waste" cities are sweeping the globe in their current practices to address the world's grand concerns linked to resources, the environment, and industry. Meanwhile, metal criticality and carbon neutrality, which have become increasingly popular in recent years, denote the material's feature and state, respectively. The goal of this article is to determine how circularity, criticality, and neutrality are related. Upscale anthropogenic circularity has the potential to expand the metal supply and, as a result, reduce metal criticality. China barely accomplished 15 % of its potential emission reduction by recycling iron, copper, and aluminum. Anthropogenic circularity has a lot of room to achieve a win-win objective, which is to reduce metal criticality while also achieving carbon neutrality in a near closed-loop cycle. Major barriers or challenges for conducting anthropogenic circularity are deriving from the inadequacy of life-cycle insight governance and the emergence of anthropogenic circularity discipline. Material flow analysis and life cycle assessment are the central methodologies to identify the hidden problems. Mineral processing and smelting, as well as end-of-life management, are indicated as critical priority areas for enhancing anthropogenic circularity. Electronic Supplementary Material: Supplementary material is available in the online version of this article at 10.1007/s11783-023-1623-2 and is accessible for authorized users.
- 125Ray, G. F. Mineral reserves: Projected lifetimes and security of supply. Resour. Policy 1984, 10 (2), 75– 80, DOI: 10.1016/0301-4207(84)90016-3There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 126Mudd, G. M.; Jowitt, S. M. Growing Global Copper Resources, Reserves and Production: Discovery Is Not the Only Control on Supply. Econ. Geol. 2018, 113 (6), 1235– 1267, DOI: 10.5382/econgeo.2018.4590There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 127Ericsson, M.; Drielsma, J.; Humphreys, D.; Storm, P.; Weihed, P. Why current assessments of ‘future efforts’ are no basis for establishing policies on material use─a response to research on ore grades. Miner. Econ. 2019, 32 (1), 111– 121, DOI: 10.1007/s13563-019-00175-6There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 128Skinner, B. J. Exploring the resource base. In Resources for the Future (RFF) Workshop on “The Long-Run Availability of Minerals”; Resources for the Future (RFF) and the Mining, Minerals and Sustainable Development Project (MMSD): Washington, D.C., 2001; p 25.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 129Skinner, B. J. A Second Iron Age Ahead? The distribution of chemical elements in the earth’s crust sets natural limits to man’s supply of metals that are much more important to the future of society than limits on energy. Am. Sci. 1976, 64 (3), 258– 269There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 130Arndt, N.; Fontboté, L.; Hedenquist, J.; Kesler, S.; Thompson, J.; Wood, D. Future Global Mineral Resources. Geochem. Perspect. 2017, 6 (1), 1– 171, DOI: 10.7185/geochempersp.6.1There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 131United States Bureau of Mines. Dictionary of Mining, Mineral, and Related Terms, 2nd ed.; American Geological Institute: Alexandria, VA, 1997.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 132Jowitt, S. M.; Mudd, G. M.; Thompson, J. F. H. Future availability of non-renewable metal resources and the influence of environmental, social, and governance conflicts on metal production. Commun. Earth Environ. 2020, 1 (1), 13, DOI: 10.1038/s43247-020-0011-0There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 133Benndorf, J. A Closed-Loop Approach for Mineral Resource Extraction. In Closed Loop Management in Mineral Resource Extraction: Turning Online Geo-Data into Mining Intelligence; Springer International Publishing: Cham, 2020; pp 5– 17.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 134Ghorbani, Y.; Nwaila, G. T.; Chirisa, M. Systematic Framework toward a Highly Reliable Approach in Metal Accounting. Miner. Process. Extr. Metall. Rev. 2022, 43 (5), 664– 678, DOI: 10.1080/08827508.2020.1784164There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 135Emery, X.; Ortiz, J. M.; Rodríguez, J. J. Quantifying Uncertainty in Mineral Resources by Use of Classification Schemes and Conditional Simulations. Math. Geol. 2006, 38 (4), 445– 464, DOI: 10.1007/s11004-005-9021-9135https://chemport.cas.org/services/resolver?origin=ACS&resolution=options&coi=1%3ACAS%3A528%3ADC%252BD28XhtlWmu7jK&md5=645a435dd40b18d683033a5ecce79bacQuantifying uncertainty in mineral resources by use of classification schemes and conditional simulationsEmery, Xavier; Ortiz, Julian M.; Rodriguez, Juan J.Mathematical Geology (2006), 38 (4), 445-464CODEN: MATGED; ISSN:0882-8121. (Springer)Mineral inventory detn. consists of estg. the amt. of mineral resources on a block-by-block basis and classifying individual blocks into categories with increasing level of geol. confidence. Such classification is a crucial issue for mining companies, investors, financial institutions, and authorities, but it remains subject to some confusion because of the wide variations in methodologies and the lack of standardized procedures. The first part of this paper considers some of the criteria used to classify resources in practice and their impact through a sensitivity study using data from a Chilean porphyry copper ore deposit. Five classification criteria are compared and evaluated, namely: Search neighborhoods, abs. and relative kriging variances, abs. and relative conditional simulation variances. It is shown that some classification criteria either favor or penalize the high-grade areas if the grade distribution presents a proportional effect. In the second part of the paper, conditional simulations are used to quantify the uncertainty on the overall mineral resources. This approach is promising for risk anal. and decision-making. Unlike linear kriging, simulations allow inclusion of a cutoff grade in the calcn. of the resources and also provide measures of their joint uncertainty over prodn. vols.
- 136Sonderegger, T.; Berger, M.; Alvarenga, R.; Bach, V.; Cimprich, A.; Dewulf, J.; Frischknecht, R.; Guinée, J.; Helbig, C.; Huppertz, T.; Jolliet, O.; Motoshita, M.; Northey, S.; Rugani, B.; Schrijvers, D.; Schulze, R.; Sonnemann, G.; Valero, A.; Weidema, B. P.; Young, S. B. Mineral resources in life cycle impact assessment─part I: a critical review of existing methods. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2020, 25 (4), 784– 797, DOI: 10.1007/s11367-020-01736-6There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 137Whiting, T. H.; Schodde, R. C. Why do brownfields exploration? In International Mine Management 2006; Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy: Melbourne, 2006; pp 41– 50.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 138Solow, R. M. Resources and Economic Growth. American Economist 1978, 22 (2), 5– 11, DOI: 10.1177/056943457802200201There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 139Tilton, J. E. The Hubbert peak model and assessing the threat of mineral depletion. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2018, 139, 280– 286, DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.08.026There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 140Reichstein, M.; Camps-Valls, G.; Stevens, B.; Jung, M.; Denzler, J.; Carvalhais, N.; Prabhat Deep learning and process understanding for data-driven Earth system science. Nature 2019, 566 (7743), 195– 204, DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-0912-1140https://chemport.cas.org/services/resolver?origin=ACS&resolution=options&coi=1%3ACAS%3A528%3ADC%252BC1MXnsVCjtrw%253D&md5=a146b45ed377bb868cdf25bd272e2006Deep learning and process understanding for data-driven Earth system scienceReichstein, Markus; Camps-Valls, Gustau; Stevens, Bjorn; Jung, Martin; Denzler, Joachim; Carvalhais, Nuno; PrabhatNature (London, United Kingdom) (2019), 566 (7743), 195-204CODEN: NATUAS; ISSN:0028-0836. (Nature Research)Machine learning approaches are increasingly used to ext. patterns and insights from the ever-increasing stream of geospatial data, but current approaches may not be optimal when system behavior is dominated by spatial or temporal context. Here, rather than amending classical machine learning, we argue that these contextual cues should be used as part of deep learning (an approach that is able to ext. spatio-temporal features automatically) to gain further process understanding of Earth system science problems, improving the predictive ability of seasonal forecasting and modeling of long-range spatial connections across multiple timescales, for example. The next step will be a hybrid modeling approach, coupling phys. process models with the versatility of data-driven machine learning.
- 141Steffen, W.; Richardson, K.; Rockström, J.; Schellnhuber, H. J.; Dube, O. P.; Dutreuil, S.; Lenton, T. M.; Lubchenco, J. The emergence and evolution of Earth System Science. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 2020, 1 (1), 54– 63, DOI: 10.1038/s43017-019-0005-6There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 142Prior, T.; Giurco, D.; Mudd, G.; Mason, L.; Behrisch, J. Resource depletion, peak minerals and the implications for sustainable resource management. Global Environ. Change 2012, 22 (3), 577– 587, DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.08.009There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 143Dewulf, J.; Hellweg, S.; Pfister, S.; León, M. F. G.; Sonderegger, T.; de Matos, C. T.; Blengini, G. A.; Mathieux, F. Towards sustainable resource management: identification and quantification of human actions that compromise the accessibility of metal resources. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2021, 167, 105403, DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105403There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 144Tanzer, J.; Rechberger, H. Setting the Common Ground: A Generic Framework for Material Flow Analysis of Complex Systems. Recycling 2019, 4 (2), 23, DOI: 10.3390/recycling4020023There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 145United Nations; European Commission; Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations; International Monetary Fund; Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development; World Bank. System of Environmental-Economic Accounting 2012: Central Framework; United Nations: Washington, 2014. DOI: 10.5089/9789211615630.069 .There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 146Sonesson, C.; Davidson, G.; Sachs, L. Mapping Mining to the Sustainable Development Goals: An Atlas; Geneva, Switzerland, 2016.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 147Mining and the SDGs: A 2020 Status Update; RMF, CCS: Nyon, Switzerland, 2020. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3726386 .There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 148RMI Report 2022 - Summary; Responsible Mining Foundation (RMF): Ontwerp, NL, 2022.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 149Steiner, G.; Geissler, B.; Watson, I.; Mew, M. C. Efficiency developments in phosphate rock mining over the last three decades. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2015, 105, 235– 245, DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.10.004There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 150Lèbre, C.; Owen, J. R.; Corder, G. D.; Kemp, D.; Stringer, M.; Valenta, R. K. Source Risks As Constraints to Future Metal Supply. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 53 (18), 10571– 10579, DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.9b02808150https://chemport.cas.org/services/resolver?origin=ACS&resolution=options&coi=1%3ACAS%3A528%3ADC%252BC1MXhs1Wjt7fP&md5=a146471958a2b65f06fde3be244d33bbSource Risks As Constraints to Future Metal SupplyLebre, Eleonore; Owen, John R.; Corder, Glen D.; Kemp, Deanna; Stringer, Martin; Valenta, Rick K.Environmental Science & Technology (2019), 53 (18), 10571-10579CODEN: ESTHAG; ISSN:0013-936X. (American Chemical Society)Rising consumer demand is driving concerns around the "availability" and "criticality" of metals. Methodologies have emerged to assess the risks related to global metal supply. None have specifically examd. the initial supply source: the mine site where primary ore is extd. Environmental, social, and governance ("ESG") risks are crit. to the development of new mining projects and the conversion of resources to mine prodn. In this paper, we offer a methodol. that assesses the inherent complexities surrounding extractives projects. It includes eight ESG risk categories that overlay the locations of undeveloped iron, copper, and aluminum orebodies that will be crit. to future supply. The percentage of global reserves and resources that are located in complex ESG contexts (i.e., with four or more concurrent medium-to-high risks) is 47% for iron, 63% for copper, and 88% for aluminum. This work contributes to research by providing a more complete understanding of source level constraints and risks to supply.
- 151Mine-Site Study 2019: Mine-Site ESG Data Disclosure by Small and Mid-Tier Mining Companies; Responsible Mining Foundation (RMF): Antwerp, NL, 2019.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 152McLellan, B. C.; Corder, G. D. Risk reduction through early assessment and integration of sustainability in design in the minerals industry. J. Clean. Prod. 2013, 53 (0), 37– 46, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.02.014There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 153Noble, A. C. Mineral resource estimation. In SME Mining Engineering Handbook, 3rd ed.; Darling, P., Ed.; Society for Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration: Englewood, CO, 2011; pp 203– 217.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 154Pell, R.; Tijsseling, L.; Palmer, L. W.; Glass, H. J.; Yan, X.; Wall, F.; Zeng, X.; Li, J. Environmental optimization of mine scheduling through life cycle assessment integration. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2019, 142, 267– 276, DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.11.022There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 155Hustrulid, W. A.; Kuchta, M.; Martin, R. K. Open Pit Mine Planning and Design. 3rd ed.; CRC Press: London, 2013.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 156Mineral Resource Governance in the 21st Century: Gearing Extractive Industries Towards Sustainable Development; International Resource Panel, United Nations Environment Programme: Nairobi, Kenya, 2020.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 157Dehaine, Q.; Tijsseling, L. T.; Glass, H. J.; Törmänen, T.; Butcher, A. R. Geometallurgy of cobalt ores: A review. Miner. Eng. 2021, 160, 106656, DOI: 10.1016/j.mineng.2020.106656157https://chemport.cas.org/services/resolver?origin=ACS&resolution=options&coi=1%3ACAS%3A528%3ADC%252BB3cXisVyitrfE&md5=4674b3cec5097ced4890ebf81aeb50a2Geometallurgy of cobalt ores: A reviewDehaine, Quentin; Tijsseling, Laurens T.; Glass, Hylke J.; Tormanen, Tuomo; Butcher, Alan R.Minerals Engineering (2021), 160 (), 106656CODEN: MENGEB; ISSN:0892-6875. (Elsevier Ltd.)A review. Cobalt (Co) is a transition metal featuring unique phys. properties which makes its use crit. for many high-tech applications such as high strength materials, magnets and most importantly, rechargeable batteries. The bulk of world cobalt output usually arises as a byproduct of extg. other metals, mostly nickel (Ni) and copper (Cu), from a wide variety of deposit types mostly Cu-Co sediment-hosted deposits, but also Ni-Co laterites, Ni-Cu-Co sulfides or hydrothermal and volcanogenic deposits. Significant differences in ore properties (geochem., mineralogy, alteration and phys. properties) exist between cobalt-contg. deposits, as well as within a single deposit, which can host a range of ore types. Variability of cobalt ores makes it challenging to develop a single extn. or treatment process that will be able to accommodate all geometallurgical variation. Overall, there is a lack of fundamental knowledge on cobalt minerals and their processability. The recovery efficiency for cobalt is generally low, in particular for processes involving flotation and smelting, leading to significant cobalt losses to mine tailings or smelter slags. This paper starts by reviewing the main geometallurgical properties of cobalt ores, with a particular focus on ore mineralogy which exerts a significant control over ore processing behavior and cobalt extn., such as the oxidn. state, i.e. oxide or sulfides which drives the selection of the processing route (leaching vs flotation), and the assocd. gangue mineralogy, which can affect acid consumption during leaching or flotation performance. The main processing routes and assocd. specific geometallurgical aspects of each deposit type are presented. The paper concludes on the future cobalt prospects, in terms of primary and secondary resources, cobalt processing and sustainable cobalt sourcing for which further research is needed.
- 158Bide, T.; Horvath, Z.; Brown, T.; Idoine, N.; Lauko, A.; Sores, L.; Petavratzi, E.; McGrath, E.; Bavec, S.; Rokavec, D.; Eloranta, T.; Aasly, K. ORAMA Project Deliverable 1.2. Final Analysis and Recommendations for the Improvement of Statistical Data Collection Methods in Europe for Primary Raw Materials; Brussels, 2018.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 159Current Non-Financial Reporting Formats and Practices; European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG): Brussels, Belgium, 2021.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 160Minerals and Economic Development. In Breaking New Ground: Mining, Minerals and Sustainable Development; Mining, Minerals and Sustainable Development; International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED): London, 2002; pp 172– 196.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 161Torres, A.; Simoni, M. U.; Keiding, J. K.; Müller, D. B.; zu Ermgassen, S. O. S. E.; Liu, J.; Jaeger, J. A. G.; Winter, M.; Lambin, E. F. Sustainability of the global sand system in the Anthropocene. One Earth 2021, 4 (5), 639– 650, DOI: 10.1016/j.oneear.2021.04.011There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 162Franks, D. M.; Keenan, J.; Hailu, D. Mineral security essential to achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. Nat. Sustainability 2023, 6 (1), 21– 27, DOI: 10.1038/s41893-022-00967-9There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 163European Commission. Reference Document on Best Available Techniques for Management of Tailings and Waste-Rock in Mining Activities; ST/EIPPCB/MTWR_BREF_FINAL; European Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control Bureau (EIPPCB): Seville, Spain, 2009.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 164Graedel, T. E.; Nassar, N. T. The criticality of metals: a perspective for geologists. Geological Society, London, Special Publications 2015, 393 (1), 291– 302, DOI: 10.1144/SP393.4There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 165Hayes, S. M.; McCullough, E. A. Critical minerals: A review of elemental trends in comprehensive criticality studies. Resour. Policy 2018, 59, 192– 199, DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2018.06.015There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 166Yan, W.; Wang, Z.; Cao, H.; Zhang, Y.; Sun, Z. Criticality assessment of metal resources in China. iScience 2021, 24 (6), 102524, DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.102524166https://chemport.cas.org/services/resolver?origin=ACS&resolution=options&coi=1%3ACAS%3A280%3ADC%252BB2c7ps1Gjtw%253D%253D&md5=01c0c2c4e6d0e6082ea942e93d80ec5aCriticality assessment of metal resources in ChinaYan Wenyi; Cao Hongbin; Zhang Yi; Sun Zhi; Yan Wenyi; Cao Hongbin; Sun Zhi; Wang ZhaolongiScience (2021), 24 (6), 102524 ISSN:.With the development of modern industries, the sustainability of critical resources has attracted worldwide attention considering the entire supply chain. With a large industrial sector size in China, a safe supply of metal resources is crucial to ensure the effective operation of the whole industry. Although specific criticality analyses have been applied to identify critical resources in some regions, including Europe and the USA, they are not ready to be directly applied in the case of China because the structure of China's industry is remarkably different from other areas. In this research, a three-dimensional methodology considering supply safety, domestic economy, and environmental risk is demonstrated, where Chinese industrial conditions are specifically considered. In total, 64 materials were introduced to perform the criticality assessment, and 18 metals were classified with a high criticality degree in the three-dimensional criticality space. With the obtained findings decision-makers can formulate strategic deployment to promote resource management.
- 167McNulty, B. A.; Jowitt, S. M. Barriers to and uncertainties in understanding and quantifying global critical mineral and element supply. iScience 2021, 24 (7), 102809, DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.102809167https://chemport.cas.org/services/resolver?origin=ACS&resolution=options&coi=1%3ACAS%3A528%3ADC%252BB38Xos1ygsQ%253D%253D&md5=e07821c0fff4b7091177bc7d7f2d6368Barriers to and uncertainties in understanding and quantifying global critical mineral and element supplyMcNulty, Brian A.; Jowitt, Simon M.iScience (2021), 24 (7), 102809CODEN: ISCICE; ISSN:2589-0042. (Elsevier B.V.)A review. The crit. minerals and elements are natural substances that are essential to modern life but have insecure supply. This lack of a secure supply clashes with the increasing importance of these elements, esp. given their use in technologies needed to reduce global CO2 emissions and mitigate against anthropogenic climate change. In this contribution we review the byproduct nature of the crit. minerals and elements and the inherant uncertainties in reported crit. mineral and element annual prodn. as well as the relationships between these commodities and main-product metals and assocd. concs. We explore the geol. and geog. barriers to crit. mineral and element supplies, as well as how the lack of available data and the uncertainties in the data that are available hinder our ability to est. global resources with confidence.
- 168Schrijvers, D.; Hool, A.; Blengini, G. A.; Chen, W.-Q.; Dewulf, J.; Eggert, R.; van Ellen, L.; Gauss, R.; Goddin, J.; Habib, K.; Hagelüken, C.; Hirohata, A.; Hofmann-Amtenbrink, M.; Kosmol, J.; Le Gleuher, M.; Grohol, M.; Ku, A.; Lee, M.-H.; Liu, G.; Nansai, K.; Nuss, P.; Peck, D.; Reller, A.; Sonnemann, G.; Tercero, L.; Thorenz, A.; Wäger, P. A. A review of methods and data to determine raw material criticality. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2020, 155, 104617, DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104617There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 169Bringezu, S. Toward science-based and knowledge-based targets for global sustainable resource use. Resources 2019, 8 (3), 140, DOI: 10.3390/resources8030140There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 170United Nations; European Commission; International Monetary Fund; Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development; World Bank. Handbook of National Accounting: Integrated Environmental and Economic Accounting; United Nations: New York, 2003.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 171EUROSTAT. Economy-wide Material Flow Accounts. Handbook 2018 ed.; Eurostat: Luxembourg, 2018. DOI: 10.2785/158567 .There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 172Adriaanse, A.; Bringezu, S.; Hammond, A.; Moriguchi, Y.; Rodenburg, E.; Rogich, D.; Schütz, H. Resource Flows: The Material Basis of Industrial Economies; World Resources Inst.: WA, 1997.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 173Watari, T.; McLellan, B. C.; Giurco, D.; Dominish, E.; Yamasue, E.; Nansai, K. Total material requirement for the global energy transition to 2050: A focus on transport and electricity. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2019, 148, 91– 103, DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.05.015There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 174Global Economy Wide Material Flow Accounting Manual; UN Environment: Nairobi, 2019.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 175Bringezu, S. Possible Target Corridor for Sustainable Use of Global Material Resources. Resources 2015, 4 (1), 25– 54, DOI: 10.3390/resources4010025There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 176Zamorano, S. Surface ore movement, storage, and recovery systems. In SME Mining Engineering Handbook, 3rd ed.; Darling, P., Ed.; Society for Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration (SME), 2011; pp 977– 985.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 177European Commission. Best Available Techniques (BAT) Reference Document for the Management of Waste from Extractive Industries in Accordance with Directive 2006/21/EC; EU Publications Office: Luxembourg, 2018. DOI: 10.2760/35297 .There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 178Baker, E.; Davies, M.; Fourie, A.; Mudd, G.; Thygesen, K. Mine Tailings Facilities: Overview and Industry Trends. In Towards Zero Harm: A Compendium of Papers Prepared for the Global Tailings Review; Global Tailings Review: London, 2020; pp 14– 23.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 179Lottermoser, B. G. Mine Wastes: Characterization, Treatment and Environmental Impacts, 3rd ed.; Springer Berlin Heidelberg: Berlin, 2010.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 180Fields, S. The earth’s open wounds: abandoned and orphaned mines. Environ. Health Perspect. 2003, 111 (3), A154– A161, DOI: 10.1289/ehp.111-a154There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 181Seymour, J. F. Hardrock Mining and the Environment: Issues of Federal Enforcement and Liability. Ecol. Law Q. 2004, 31 (4), 795– 956There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 182Hudson-Edwards, K. A.; Jamieson, H. E.; Lottermoser, B. G. Mine Wastes: Past, Present, Future. Elements 2011, 7 (6), 375– 380, DOI: 10.2113/gselements.7.6.375There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 183Mittal, A. K. Abandoned Mines: Information on the Number of Hardrock Mines, Cost of Cleanup, and Value of Financial Assurances; Testimony Before the Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources, Committee on Natural Resources, House of Representatives; US Government Accountability Office: Washington, D.C., 14.07.2011, 2011.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 184Lottermoser, B. G. Recycling, Reuse and Rehabilitation of Mine Wastes. Elements 2011, 7 (6), 405– 410, DOI: 10.2113/gselements.7.6.405184https://chemport.cas.org/services/resolver?origin=ACS&resolution=options&coi=1%3ACAS%3A528%3ADC%252BC38XhsV2itrc%253D&md5=4d372f3184ed8c6d37edc5ae00164a27Recycling, reuse and rehabilitation of mine wastesLottermoser, Bernd G.Elements (Chantilly, VA, United States) (2011), 7 (6), 405-410CODEN: EOOCAG; ISSN:1811-5209. (Mineralogical Society of America)If we want to ensure a sustainable future for the human race, we must learn to prevent, minimize, reuse and recycle waste. Reuse of mine wastes allows their beneficial application, whereas recycling exts. resource ingredients or converts wastes into valuable products. Yet, today, many of the proposed reuse and recycling concepts for mine wastes are not economic. Consequently, the great majority of mine wastes are still being placed into waste storage facilities. Significant research efforts are required to develop cost-effective reuse and recycling options and to prevent the migration of contaminants from rehabilitated waste repositories in the long term.
- 185Franks, D. M.; Stringer, M.; Torres-Cruz, L. A.; Baker, E.; Valenta, R.; Thygesen, K.; Matthews, A.; Howchin, J.; Barrie, S. Tailings facility disclosures reveal stability risks. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11 (1), 5353, DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-84897-0185https://chemport.cas.org/services/resolver?origin=ACS&resolution=options&coi=1%3ACAS%3A528%3ADC%252BB3MXmtFWgtbo%253D&md5=73f64d303c46ed219384e1eb6465d498Tailings facility disclosures reveal stability risksFranks, Daniel M.; Stringer, Martin; Torres-Cruz, Luis A.; Baker, Elaine; Valenta, Rick; Thygesen, Kristina; Matthews, Adam; Howchin, John; Barrie, StephenScientific Reports (2021), 11 (1), 5353CODEN: SRCEC3; ISSN:2045-2322. (Nature Research)Abstr.: Tailings facility failures represent a significant risk to the environment and communities globally, but until now little data was available on the global distribution of risks and characteristics of facilities to ensure proper governance. We conducted a survey and compiled a database with information on tailings facilities disclosed by extractive companies at the request of institutional investors. Despite limitations in the data, this information disclosure request represents the most comprehensive survey of tailings facilities ever undertaken. The compiled dataset includes 1743 tailings facilities and provides insights into a range of topics including construction method, stability, consequence of failure, stored vol., and the rate of uptake of alternative technologies to dewater tailings and reduce geotech. risk. Our anal. reveals that 10 per cent of tailings facilities reported notable stability concerns or failure to be confirmed or certified as stable at some point in their history, with distinct trends according to construction method, governance, age, height, vol. and seismic hazard. Controversy has surrounded the safety of tailings facilities, most notably upstream facilities, for many years but in the absence of definitive empirical data differentiating the risks of different facility types, upstream facilities have continued to be used widely by the industry and a consensus has emerged that upstream facilities can theor. be built safely under the right circumstances. Our findings reveal that in practice active upstream facilities report a higher incidence of stability issues (18.3%) than other facility types, and that this elevated risk persists even when these facilities are built in high governance settings. In-pit/natural landform and dry-stack facilities report lower incidence of stability issues, though the rate of stability issues is significant by engineering stds. (> 2 per cent) across all construction methods, highlighting the universal importance of careful facility management and governance. The insights reported here can assist the global governance of tailings facility stability risks.
- 186Kirchherr, J.; Reike, D.; Hekkert, M. Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2017, 127, 221– 232, DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 187Song, Q.; Li, J.; Zeng, X. Minimizing the increasing solid waste through zero waste strategy. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 104, 199– 210, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.08.027There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 188Hilton, J.; Moussaid, M.; Birky, B. In Comprehensive Extraction: A Key Requirement for Social Licensing of NORM Industries?; Seventh International Symposium on Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material (NORM VII); International Atomic Energy Agency, 22-26.04.2013; Beijing, China, 2013; pp 129– 141.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 189MacDonald, D.; Hilton, J.; Elliott, D.; Heiberg, S.; Tulsidas, H.; Griffiths, C. In Transforming Natural Resource Management for a Sustainable Planet; SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition 2018, ATCE 2018; Dallas, U.S.A., 2018; p 10.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 190Blengini, G.; Mathieux, F.; Mancini, L.; Nyberg, M.; Viegas, H. Recovery of Critical and Other Raw Materials from Mining Waste and Landfills; Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2019. DOI: 10.2760/600775 .There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 191Lebre, E.; Stringer, M.; Svobodova, K.; Owen, J. R.; Kemp, D.; Cote, C.; Arratia-Solar, A.; Valenta, R. K. The social and environmental complexities of extracting energy transition metals. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11 (1), 4823, DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-18661-9191https://chemport.cas.org/services/resolver?origin=ACS&resolution=options&coi=1%3ACAS%3A528%3ADC%252BB3cXhvFOhsLrF&md5=c5ff76830ad6a18017da03b525fd230bThe social and environmental complexities of extracting energy transition metalsLebre, Eleonore; Stringer, Martin; Svobodova, Kamila; Owen, John R.; Kemp, Deanna; Cote, Claire; Arratia-Solar, Andrea; Valenta, Rick K.Nature Communications (2020), 11 (1), 4823CODEN: NCAOBW; ISSN:2041-1723. (Nature Research)Environmental, social and governance pressures should feature in future scenario planning about the transition to a low carbon future. As low-carbon energy technologies advance, markets are driving demand for energy transition metals. Increased extn. rates will augment the stress placed on people and the environment in extractive locations. To quantify this stress, we develop a set of global composite environmental, social and governance indicators, and examine mining projects across 20 metal commodities to identify the co-occurrence of environmental, social and governance risk factors. Our findings show that 84% of platinum resources and 70% of cobalt resources are located in high-risk contexts. Reflecting heightened demand, major metals like iron and copper are set to disturb more land. Jurisdictions extg. energy transition metals in low-risk contexts are positioned to develop and maintain safeguards against mining-related social and environmental risk factors.
- 192Suppes, R.; Heuss-Aßbichler, S. Resource potential of mine wastes: A conventional and sustainable perspective on a case study tailings mining project. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 297, 126446, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126446There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 193Žibret, G.; Lemiere, B.; Mendez, A.-M.; Cormio, C.; Sinnett, D.; Cleall, P.; Szabó, K.; Carvalho, M. T. National Mineral Waste Databases as an Information Source for Assessing Material Recovery Potential from Mine Waste, Tailings and Metallurgical Waste. Minerals 2020, 10 (5), 446, DOI: 10.3390/min10050446There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 194The Use of Natural Resources in the Economy: A Global Manual on Economy Wide Material Flow Accounting; DEW/2356/NA; United Nations Environment Programme: Nairobi, Kenya, 2023.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 195Lenzen, M.; Geschke, A.; West, J.; Fry, J.; Malik, A.; Giljum, S.; Milài Canals, L.; Piñero, P.; Lutter, S.; Wiedmann, T.; Li, M.; Sevenster, M.; Potočnik, J.; Teixeira, I.; Van Voore, M.; Nansai, K.; Schandl, H. Implementing the material footprint to measure progress towards Sustainable Development Goals 8 and 12. Nat. Sustainability 2022, 5 (2), 157– 166, DOI: 10.1038/s41893-021-00811-6There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 196Lebre, E.; Corder, G. D.; Golev, A. Sustainable practices in the management of mining waste: A focus on the mineral resource. Miner. Eng. 2017, 107, 34– 42, DOI: 10.1016/j.mineng.2016.12.004196https://chemport.cas.org/services/resolver?origin=ACS&resolution=options&coi=1%3ACAS%3A528%3ADC%252BC28XitFehsrbP&md5=db1feea1345e1a3081ddbfa0a471f1d5Sustainable practices in the management of mining waste: A focus on the mineral resourceLebre, Eleonore; Corder, Glen D.; Golev, ArtemMinerals Engineering (2017), 107 (), 34-42CODEN: MENGEB; ISSN:0892-6875. (Elsevier Ltd.)A review. The environmental legacies of metal mining are often dominated by large waste facilities, which can be sources of acid and metalliferous drainage, resulting in both local pollution and irreversible loss of some of the sol. minerals. Whether a material is treated as waste or ore depends on a wide variety of factors and circumstances. Three crit. aspects - time, the extractive strategy and the economic context - are discussed in this paper. The authors argue that the fine line between waste and ore requires a mine waste management (MWM) hierarchy that properly considers waste as a potential future resource. This hierarchy exhibits four main levels: reduce, reprocess & stockpile, downcycle and dispose, which are illustrated by a review of both academic research and public data on industrial practices. The authors conclude that to generate the most successful outcomes the hierarchy must operate across all levels and is a core component of an overall mine sustainability framework.
- 197Tuck, C. A.; Xun, S.; Singerling, S. A. Global Iron Ore Production Data; Clarification of Reporting from USGS. Mining Eng. 2017, 69 (2), 20– 23There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 198Driftsplanveileder Fast fjell; Direktoratet for mineralforvaltning med Bergmesteren for Svalbard: Trondheim, 2021.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 199CIM Estimation of Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves Best Practice Guidelines; CIM: Quebec, Canada, 2019.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 200CIM Leading Practice Guidelines for Mineral Processing; CIM: Quebec, Canada, 2022.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 201Apel, M. From 3d geomodelling systems towards 3d geoscience information systems: Data model, query functionality, and data management. Comput. Geosci. 2006, 32 (2), 222– 229, DOI: 10.1016/j.cageo.2005.06.016There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 202Berg, R. C.; Kessler, H.; MacCormack, K. E.; Russell, H. A.; Thorleifson, L. H. Future of 3D Geological Mapping and Modelling at Geological Survey Organizations. 2019 Synopsis of Three-dimensional Geological Mapping and Modelling at Geological Survey Organizations 2019, 302– 305There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 203Stafleu, J.; Maljers, D.; Busschers, F. S.; Schokker, J.; Gunnink, J. L.; Dambrink, R. M. Models Created as 3-D Cellular Voxel Arrays. Applied Multidimensional Geological Modeling 2021, 247– 271, DOI: 10.1002/9781119163091.ch11There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 204Dimitrakopoulos, R. Stochastic optimization for strategic mine planning: A decade of developments. J. Min. Sci. 2011, 47 (2), 138– 150, DOI: 10.1134/S1062739147020018There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 205Goodfellow, R. C.; Dimitrakopoulos, R. Global optimization of open pit mining complexes with uncertainty. Appl. Soft Comput. 2016, 40, 292– 304, DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2015.11.038There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 206Lindsay, M. D.; Aillères, L.; Jessell, M. W.; de Kemp, E. A.; Betts, P. G. Locating and quantifying geological uncertainty in three-dimensional models: Analysis of the Gippsland Basin, southeastern Australia. Tectonophysics 2012, 546–547, 10– 27, DOI: 10.1016/j.tecto.2012.04.007There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 207Krajnovich, A.; Zhou, W.; Gutierrez, M. Uncertainty assessment for 3D geologic modeling of fault zones based on geologic inputs and prior knowledge. Solid Earth 2020, 11 (4), 1457– 1474, DOI: 10.5194/se-11-1457-2020There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 208Bianchi, M.; Turner, A. K.; Lark, M.; Courrioux, G. Uncertainty in 3-D Geological Models. In Applied Multidimensional Geological Modeling; John Wiley & Sons Ltd: West Sussex, UK, 2021; pp 357– 382.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 209Dowd, P. Quantifying the Impacts of Uncertainty. In Handbook of Mathematical Geosciences: Fifty Years of IAMG; Daya Sagar, B. S., Cheng, Q., Agterberg, F., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, 2018; pp 349– 373.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 210Abdulai, M.; Sharifzadeh, M. Uncertainty and Reliability Analysis of Open Pit Rock Slopes: A Critical Review of Methods of Analysis. Geotech. Geol. Eng. 2019, 37 (3), 1223– 1247, DOI: 10.1007/s10706-018-0680-yThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 211Speirs, J.; McGlade, C.; Slade, R. Uncertainty in the availability of natural resources: Fossil fuels, critical metals and biomass. Energy Policy 2015, 87, 654– 664, DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2015.02.031There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 212McManus, S.; Rahman, A.; Coombes, J.; Horta, A. Uncertainty assessment of spatial domain models in early stage mining projects - A review. Ore Geol. Rev. 2021, 133, 104098, DOI: 10.1016/j.oregeorev.2021.104098There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 213Bloodworth, A. J.; Gunn, A. G. The future of the global minerals and metals sector: issues and challenges out to 2050. Geosciences: BRGM’s Journal for a Sustainable Earth 2012, 15, 90– 97There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 214Cole, L. How ending mining would change the world. 2022. https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20220413-how-ending-mining-would-change-the-world (accessed 18.04.2023).There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 215Liang, Y.; Kleijn, R.; Tukker, A.; van der Voet, E. Material requirements for low-carbon energy technologies: A quantitative review. Renew. Sust. Energy Rev. 2022, 161, 112334, DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2022.112334There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 216More, K. S.; Wolkersdorfer, C.; Kang, N.; Elmaghraby, A. S. Automated measurement systems in mine water management and mine workings - A review of potential methods. Water Resour. Ind. 2020, 24, 100136, DOI: 10.1016/j.wri.2020.100136There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 217Yousefi, M.; Carranza, E. J. M.; Kreuzer, O. P.; Nykänen, V.; Hronsky, J. M. A.; Mihalasky, M. J. Data analysis methods for prospectivity modelling as applied to mineral exploration targeting: State-of-the-art and outlook. J. Geochem. Explor. 2021, 229, 106839, DOI: 10.1016/j.gexplo.2021.106839217https://chemport.cas.org/services/resolver?origin=ACS&resolution=options&coi=1%3ACAS%3A528%3ADC%252BB3MXht12ju77L&md5=4e36be13cf5bb649c8f21825ce8ce34bData analysis methods for prospectivity modelling as applied to mineral exploration targeting: State-of-the-art and outlookYousefi, Mahyar; Carranza, Emmanuel John M.; Kreuzer, Oliver P.; Nykanen, Vesa; Hronsky, Jon M. A.; Mihalasky, Mark J.Journal of Geochemical Exploration (2021), 229 (), 106839CODEN: JGCEAT; ISSN:0375-6742. (Elsevier B.V.)Mineral exploration targeting is a highly complex decision-making task. Two key risk factors, the quality of exploration data and robustness of the underlying conceptual targeting model, have a strong impact on the effectiveness of this decision-making. Geog. information systems (GIS) can be used not only for compiling, integrating, interrogating and interpreting diverse exploration data, but also for targeting by employing powerful math. algorithms, an approach that is commonly referred to as mineral potential modeling or mineral prospectivity mapping (MPM). Here, we pose and examine key aspects around the question of "how can we get better at mineral exploration targeting using GIS". We do this by (1) reviewing the fundamental aspects of MPM, (2) identifying significant deficiencies of MPM, and (3) discussing possible solns. to alleviating or eliminating these deficiencies. In particular, we discuss how these deficiencies can be overcome by adopting an intelligence amplification system, such as the recently proposed exploration information system (EIS) for translating crit. ore-forming processes into spatially predictive criteria (i.e., predictor maps and spatial proxies) and improving decision-making in mineral exploration targeting.
- 218Nurmi, P. A. The Geological Survey of Finland strengthening its role as a key player in mineral raw materials innovation ecosystems. Geological Society, London, Special Publications 2020, 499 (1), 149– 163, DOI: 10.1144/SP499-2019-83There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 219Fogarty, J. J. An Economic Assessment of the Exploration Incentive Scheme: 10 years from 2009 to 2020; Prepared for the Department of Mines, Industry Regulation and Safety: Geological Survey of Western Australia: Perth, Australia, 2021.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 220Wittenberg, A.; Oliveira, D. d.; Jorgensen, L. F.; Gonzalez, F. J.; Heldal, T.; Aasly, K. A.; Deady, E.; Kumelj, Š.; Sievers, H.; Horvath, Z.; McGrath, E. GeoERA Raw Materials Monograph - The Past and the Future; Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources (BGR): Hannover, Germany, 2022. DOI: 10.25928/geoera_rawmat22_1 .There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 221Bide, T.; Brown, T. J.; Gunn, A. G.; Mankelow, J. M. Utilisation of multiple current and legacy datasets to create a national minerals inventory: A UK case study. Resour. Policy 2020, 66, 101654, DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101654There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 222van Genderen, J.; Goodchild, M. F.; Guo, H.; Yang, C.; Nativi, S.; Wang, L.; Wang, C. Digital Earth Challenges and Future Trends. In Manual of Digital Earth; Guo, H., Goodchild, M. F., Annoni, A., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2020; pp 811– 827.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 223Sudmanns, M.; Tiede, D.; Lang, S.; Bergstedt, H.; Trost, G.; Augustin, H.; Baraldi, A.; Blaschke, T. Big Earth data: disruptive changes in Earth observation data management and analysis?. International Journal of Digital Earth 2020, 13 (7), 832– 850, DOI: 10.1080/17538947.2019.1585976There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 224OneGelogy Consortium. OneGelogy - Providing geoscience data globally 2022. https://onegeology.org/ (accessed 18.04.2023).There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 225Baumann, P.; Rossi, A. P.; Bell, B.; Clements, O.; Evans, B.; Hoenig, H.; Hogan, P.; Kakaletris, G.; Koltsida, P.; Mantovani, S.; Marco Figuera, R.; Merticariu, V.; Misev, D.; Pham, H. B.; Siemen, S.; Wagemann, J. Fostering Cross-Disciplinary Earth Science Through Datacube Analytics. In Earth Observation Open Science and Innovation, Mathieu, P.-P.; Aubrecht, C., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, 2018; pp 91– 119.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 226O’Sullivan, C.; Wise, N.; Mathieu, P.-P. The Changing Landscape of Geospatial Information Markets. In Earth Observation Open Science and Innovation; Mathieu, P.-P., Aubrecht, C., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, 2018; pp 3– 23.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 227Zhu, Z.; Zhou, Y.; Seto, K. C.; Stokes, E. C.; Deng, C.; Pickett, S. T. A.; Taubenböck, H. Understanding an urbanizing planet: Strategic directions for remote sensing. Remote Sens. Environ. 2019, 228, 164– 182, DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2019.04.020There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 228Prakash, M.; Ramage, S.; Kavvada, A.; Goodman, S. Open Earth Observations for Sustainable Urban Development. Remote Sens. 2020, 12 (10), 1646, DOI: 10.3390/rs12101646There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 229Maus, V.; Giljum, S.; da Silva, D. M.; Gutschlhofer, J.; da Rosa, R. P.; Luckeneder, S.; Gass, S. L. B.; Lieber, M.; McCallum, I. An update on global mining land use. Sci. Data 2022, 9 (1), 433, DOI: 10.1038/s41597-022-01547-4229https://chemport.cas.org/services/resolver?origin=ACS&resolution=options&coi=1%3ACAS%3A280%3ADC%252BB2MbhvFaruw%253D%253D&md5=b1d8cfbec1c029d44129c098d525ecb6An update on global mining land useMaus Victor; Giljum Stefan; Gutschlhofer Jakob; Luckeneder Sebastian; Lieber Mirko; Maus Victor; McCallum Ian; da Silva Dieison M; Gass Sidnei L B; da Rosa Robson PScientific data (2022), 9 (1), 433 ISSN:.The growing demand for minerals has pushed mining activities into new areas increasingly affecting biodiversity-rich natural biomes. Mapping the land use of the global mining sector is, therefore, a prerequisite for quantifying, understanding and mitigating adverse impacts caused by mineral extraction. This paper updates our previous work mapping mining sites worldwide. Using visual interpretation of Sentinel-2 images for 2019, we inspected more than 34,000 mining locations across the globe. The result is a global-scale dataset containing 44,929 polygon features covering 101,583 km(2) of large-scale as well as artisanal and small-scale mining. The increase in coverage is substantial compared to the first version of the dataset, which included 21,060 polygons extending over 57,277 km(2). The polygons cover open cuts, tailings dams, waste rock dumps, water ponds, processing plants, and other ground features related to the mining activities. The dataset is available for download from https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.942325 and visualisation at www.fineprint.global/viewer .
- 230Ren, H.; Zhao, Y.; Xiao, W.; Hu, Z. A review of UAV monitoring in mining areas: current status and future perspectives. Int. J. Coal Sci. 2019, 6 (3), 320– 333, DOI: 10.1007/s40789-019-00264-5There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 231Tucci, G.; Gebbia, A.; Conti, A.; Fiorini, L.; Lubello, C. Monitoring and Computation of the Volumes of Stockpiles of Bulk Material by Means of UAV Photogrammetric Surveying. Remote Sens. 2019, 11 (12), 1471, DOI: 10.3390/rs11121471There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 232New Tech, new deal - Technology Impacts Review; Intergovernmental Forum on Mining, Minerals, Metals and Sustainable Development (IGF). International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD): Winnipeg, Canada, 2019.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 233Jang, H.; Topal, E. Transformation of the Australian mining industry and future prospects. Mining Technology 2020, 129 (3), 120– 134, DOI: 10.1080/25726668.2020.1786298There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 234Li, W.; Hsu, C.-Y. GeoAI for Large-Scale Image Analysis and Machine Vision: Recent Progress of Artificial Intelligence in Geography. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 2022, 11 (7), 385, DOI: 10.3390/ijgi11070385There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 235Smith, W. D.; Maier, W. D. The geotectonic setting, age and mineral deposit inventory of global layered intrusions. Earth-Sci. Rev. 2021, 220, 103736, DOI: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2021.103736235https://chemport.cas.org/services/resolver?origin=ACS&resolution=options&coi=1%3ACAS%3A528%3ADC%252BB3MXhsFCjsrvN&md5=d3fd29bde1324d44cddf7f4423a79df5The geotectonic setting, age and mineral deposit inventory of global layered intrusionsSmith, W. D.; Maier, W. D.Earth-Science Reviews (2021), 220 (), 103736CODEN: ESREAV; ISSN:0012-8252. (Elsevier B.V.)A review. In the present paper, we have compiled data on 565 layered and differentiated igneous intrusions globally, documenting their (i) location, (ii) age, (iii) size, (iv) geotectonic setting, (v) putative parent magma(s), (vi) crystn. sequence, and (vii) mineral deposits. Most studied intrusions occur in Russia (98), Australia (72), Canada (52), Finland (37), South Africa (38), China (33), and Brazil (31). Notable clusters of: (i) Archaean intrusions (∼ 15%) include those of the McFaulds Lake Area (commonly known as the Ring of Fire, Canada), Pilbara and Yilgarn cratons (Australia), and Barberton (South Africa); (ii) Proterozoic intrusions (∼ 56%) include those of the Giles Event and Halls Creek Orogen (Australia), Kaapvaal craton and its margin (South Africa and Botswana), Kola and Karelia cratons (Finland and Russia), and Midcontinent Rift (Canada and USA); and (iii) Phanerozoic intrusions (∼ 29%) include those of eastern Greenland, the Central Asian Orogenic Belt (China and Mongolia) and Emeishan large igneous province (China). Throughout geol. time, the occurrence of many layered intrusions correlate broadly with the amalgamation and break-up of supercontinents, yet the size and mineral inventory of intrusions shows no obvious secular changes. In our compilation, 337 intrusions possess one or more types of mineral occurrences, including: (i) 107 with stratiform PGE reef-style mineralization, (ii) 138 with Ni-Cu-(PGE) contact-style mineralization, (iii) 74 with stratiform Fe-Ti-V-(P) horizons, and (iv) ≥ 35 with chromitite seams. Sill-like or chonolithic differentiated intrusions present in extensional tectonic settings and spanning geol. time are most prospective for Ni-Cu-(PGE) mineralization. In contrast, PGE reef-style deposits are most prevalent in larger, commonly lopolithic intrusions that are generally >1 Ga in age (∼ 75%). Stratiform Fe-Ti-V-(P) horizons are most common in the central and upper portions of larger layered intrusions, occurring in the Archaean and Phanerozoic. Approx. 80% of intrusions with chromitite seams are older than 1 Ga and greater than 50% of them also contain PGE reefs. Based on the distribution of layered intrusions in relatively well explored terranes (e.g., Finland, South Africa, Western Australia), we propose that many layered intrusions remain to be discovered on Earth, particularly in poorly explored and relatively inaccessible regions of Africa, Australia, Russia, Greenland, Antarctica, South America, and northern Canada.
- 236Dong, J.; Metternicht, G.; Hostert, P.; Fensholt, R.; Chowdhury, R. R. Remote sensing and geospatial technologies in support of a normative land system science: status and prospects. COSUST 2019, 38, 44– 52, DOI: 10.1016/j.cosust.2019.05.003There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 237Gorelick, N.; Hancher, M.; Dixon, M.; Ilyushchenko, S.; Thau, D.; Moore, R. Google Earth Engine: Planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone. Remote Sens. Environ. 2017, 202, 18– 27, DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2017.06.031There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 238Planetary Computer; Microsoft, 2022.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 239Kopp, S.; Becker, P.; Doshi, A.; Wright, D. J.; Zhang, K.; Xu, H. Achieving the Full Vision of Earth Observation Data Cubes. Data 2019, 4 (3), 94, DOI: 10.3390/data4030094There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 240Bauer, P.; Dueben, P. D.; Hoefler, T.; Quintino, T.; Schulthess, T. C.; Wedi, N. P. The digital revolution of Earth-system science. Nature Computational Science 2021, 1 (2), 104– 113, DOI: 10.1038/s43588-021-00023-0There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 241Graciano, A.; Rueda, A. J.; Feito, F. R. Real-time visualization of 3D terrains and subsurface geological structures. Adv. Eng. Software 2018, 115, 314– 326, DOI: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2017.10.002There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 242Schokker, J.; Sandersen, P.; de Beer, J.; Eriksson, I.; Kallio, H.; Kearsey, T.; Pfleiderer, S.; Seither, A. 3D Urban Subsurface Modelling and Visualisation - A Review of Good Practices and Techniques to Ensure Optimal Use of Geological Information in Urban Planning; COST Action Sub-Urban, 2017.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 243Baumberger, R.; Oesterling, N. The National Geological Model: Towards mastering the Digital Transformation in Switzerland. In Three-Dimensional Geological Mapping and Modeling; Vancouver, BC, 2018; pp 19– 23.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 244Guo, J.; Wang, X.; Wang, J.; Dai, X.; Wu, L.; Li, C.; Li, F.; Liu, S.; Jessell, M. W. Three-dimensional geological modeling and spatial analysis from geotechnical borehole data using an implicit surface and marching tetrahedra algorithm. Eng. Geol. 2021, 284, 106047, DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2021.106047There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 245Guo, H.; Li, X.; Wang, W.; Lv, Z.; Wu, C.; Xu, W. An event-driven dynamic updating method for 3D geo-databases. Geo-Spat. Inf. Sci. 2016, 19 (2), 140– 147, DOI: 10.1080/10095020.2016.1182808There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 246Marker, B.; Turner, A. K. Legislation, regulation and management. In Applied Multidimensional Geological Modeling; Turner, A. K., Kessler, H., Van der Meulen, M., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons, 2021; pp 35– 68.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 247Grieves, M. Virtually Intelligent Product Systems: Digital and Physical Twins. In Complex Systems Engineering: Theory and Practice; Flumerfelt, S., Schwartz, K. G., Mavris, D., Briceno, S., Eds. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics: Reston, VA, 2019; pp 175– 200.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 248Rasheed, A.; San, O.; Kvamsdal, T. Digital Twin: Values, Challenges and Enablers From a Modeling Perspective. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 21980– 22012, DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2970143There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 249Zobl, F.; Marschallinger, R. GeoBIM - Subsurface Building Information Modelling. GEOinformatics 2008, 8 (11), 40– 43There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 250Huang, M. Q.; Ninić, J.; Zhang, Q. B. BIM, machine learning and computer vision techniques in underground construction: Current status and future perspectives. Tunnel. Underground Space Technol. 2021, 108, 103677, DOI: 10.1016/j.tust.2020.103677There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 251Gore, A. The digital earth: understanding our planet in the 21st century. Australian surveyor 1998, 43 (2), 89– 91, DOI: 10.1080/00050348.1998.10558728There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 252Coalition for Digital Environmental Sustainability. Action Plan for a Sustainable Planet in the Digital Age ; United Nations: 2022. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.6573509 .There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 253Van Oosterom, P.; Stoter, J. 5D data modelling: full integration of 2D/3D space, time and scale dimensions; International Conference on Geographic Information Science, 2010; Springer: 2010; pp 310– 324.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 254Turner, A. K.; Kessler, H.; Van der Meulen, M. Introduction to modeling terminology and concepts. In Applied Multidimensional Geological Modeling, Turner, A. K.; Kessler, H.; Van der Meulen, M., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons, 2021; pp 3– 33.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 255Breunig, M.; Bradley, P. E.; Jahn, M.; Kuper, P.; Mazroob, N.; Rösch, N.; Al-Doori, M.; Stefanakis, E.; Jadidi, M. Geospatial Data Management Research: Progress and Future Directions. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 2020, 9 (2), 95, DOI: 10.3390/ijgi9020095There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 256Baumann, P. A General Conceptual Framework for Multi-Dimensional Spatio-Temporal Data Sets. Environ. Model. Software 2021, 143, 105096, DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2021.105096There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 257European Commission. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions - A European strategy for data. Official Journal of the European Union, COM/2020/66 final, 2020.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 258van den Brink, L.; Barnaghi, P.; Tandy, J.; Atemezing, G.; Atkinson, R.; Cochrane, B.; Fathy, Y.; Garcia Castro, R.; Haller, A.; Harth, A.; Janowicz, K.; Kolozali, S.; van Leeuwen, B.; Lefrancois, M.; Lieberman, J.; Perego, A.; Le-Phuoc, D.; Roberts, B.; Taylor, K.; Troncy, R. Best practices for publishing, retrieving, and using spatial data on the web. Semantic Web 2018, 10 (1), 95– 114, DOI: 10.3233/SW-180305There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 259European Commission. Directive 2007/2/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 March 2007 establishing an Infrastructure for Spatial Information in the European Community (INSPIRE). Official Journal of the European Union, L 108, 1–14, 2007.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 260Deep-time Digital Earth (DDE) 2020–2030; International Union of Geological Sciences IUGS: Yangcheng, China, 2022.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 261Wang, C.; Hazen, R. M.; Cheng, Q.; Stephenson, M. H.; Zhou, C.; Fox, P.; Shen, S.-z.; Oberhänsli, R.; Hou, Z.; Ma, X.; Feng, Z.; Fan, J.; Ma, C.; Hu, X.; Luo, B.; Wang, J.; Schiffries, C. M. The Deep-Time Digital Earth program: data-driven discovery in geosciences. Natl. Sci. Rev. 2021, 8 (9), nwab027, DOI: 10.1093/nsr/nwab027There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 262Xu, L. D. The contribution of systems science to Industry 4.0. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 2020, 37 (4), 618– 631, DOI: 10.1002/sres.2705There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 263Åm, K.; Heiberg, S. Public-private partnership for improved hydrocarbon recovery - Lessons from Norway’s major development programs. Energy Strategy Reviews 2014, 3, 30– 48, DOI: 10.1016/j.esr.2014.06.003There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 264Prahalad, C. K.; Ramaswamy, V. Co-creation experiences: The next practice in value creation. J. Interact. Mark. 2004, 18 (3), 5– 14, DOI: 10.1002/dir.20015There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 265Scott, M.; Jones, M. Management of Public Geoscience Data; International Mining for Development Centre (IM4DC): Perth, Australia, 2014.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 266Nad, A.; Jooshaki, M.; Tuominen, E.; Michaux, S.; Kirpala, A.; Newcomb, J. Digitalization Solutions in the Mineral Processing Industry: The Case of GTK Mintec, Finland. Minerals 2022, 12 (2), 210, DOI: 10.3390/min12020210There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 267Sun, Z.; Sandoval, L.; Crystal-Ornelas, R.; Mousavi, S. M.; Wang, J.; Lin, C.; Cristea, N.; Tong, D.; Carande, W. H.; Ma, X.; Rao, Y.; Bednar, J. A.; Tan, A.; Wang, J.; Purushotham, S.; Gill, T. E.; Chastang, J.; Howard, D.; Holt, B.; Gangodagamage, C.; Zhao, P.; Rivas, P.; Chester, Z.; Orduz, J.; John, A. A review of Earth Artificial Intelligence. Comput. Geosci. 2022, 159, 105034, DOI: 10.1016/j.cageo.2022.105034There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 268Litvinenko, V. S. Digital Economy as a Factor in the Technological Development of the Mineral Sector. Nat. Resour. Res. 2020, 29 (3), 1521– 1541, DOI: 10.1007/s11053-019-09568-4There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 269Ghorbani, Y.; Zhang, S. E.; Nwaila, G. T.; Bourdeau, J. E. Framework components for data-centric dry laboratories in the minerals industry: A path to science-and-technology-led innovation. Extr. Ind. Soc. 2022, 10, 101089, DOI: 10.1016/j.exis.2022.101089There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 270McCuaig, T. C.; Hronsky, J. M. A.; Kelley, K. D.; Golden, H. C. The Mineral System Concept: The Key to Exploration Targeting. In Building Exploration Capability for the 21st Century; Society of Economic Geologists: 2014; Vol. 18, p 0.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 271Lawrence, M. G.; Williams, S.; Nanz, P.; Renn, O. Characteristics, potentials, and challenges of transdisciplinary research. One Earth 2022, 5 (1), 44– 61, DOI: 10.1016/j.oneear.2021.12.010There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 272UNEA. Mineral Resource Governance. United Nations Environment Programme, 2019.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 273Wilkinson, M. D.; Dumontier, M.; Aalbersberg, I. J.; Appleton, G.; Axton, M.; Baak, A.; Blomberg, N.; Boiten, J.-W.; da Silva Santos, L. B.; Bourne, P. E.; Bouwman, J.; Brookes, A. J.; Clark, T.; Crosas, M.; Dillo, I.; Dumon, O.; Edmunds, S.; Evelo, C. T.; Finkers, R.; Gonzalez-Beltran, A.; Gray, A. J. G.; Groth, P.; Goble, C.; Grethe, J. S.; Heringa, J.; ’t Hoen, P. A. C.; Hooft, R.; Kuhn, T.; Kok, R.; Kok, J.; Lusher, S. J.; Martone, M. E.; Mons, A.; Packer, A. L.; Persson, B.; Rocca-Serra, P.; Roos, M.; van Schaik, R.; Sansone, S.-A.; Schultes, E.; Sengstag, T.; Slater, T.; Strawn, G.; Swertz, M. A.; Thompson, M.; van der Lei, J.; van Mulligen, E.; Velterop, J.; Waagmeester, A.; Wittenburg, P.; Wolstencroft, K.; Zhao, J.; Mons, B. The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci. Data 2016, 3 (1), 160018, DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2016.18273https://chemport.cas.org/services/resolver?origin=ACS&resolution=options&coi=1%3ACAS%3A280%3ADC%252BC28bjslyrtQ%253D%253D&md5=e4ce8cf366db2280e54eb0168940720bThe FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardshipWilkinson Mark D; Dumontier Michel; Aalbersberg I Jsbrand Jan; Appleton Gabrielle; Dumon Olivier; Groth Paul; Strawn George; Axton Myles; Baak Arie; Blomberg Niklas; Boiten Jan-Willem; da Silva Santos Luiz Bonino; Bourne Philip E; Bouwman Jildau; Brookes Anthony J; Clark Tim; Crosas Merce; Dillo Ingrid; Edmunds Scott; Evelo Chris T; Finkers Richard; Gonzalez-Beltran Alejandra; Rocca-Serra Philippe; Sansone Susanna-Assunta; Gray Alasdair J G; Goble Carole; Grethe Jeffrey S; Heringa Jaap; Kok Ruben; 't Hoen Peter A C; Hooft Rob; Kuhn Tobias; Kok Joost; Lusher Scott J; Mons Barend; Martone Maryann E; Mons Albert; Packer Abel L; Persson Bengt; Roos Marco; Thompson Mark; van Schaik Rene; Schultes Erik; Sengstag Thierry; Slater Ted; Swertz Morris A; van der Lei Johan; van Mulligen Erik; Mons Barend; Velterop Jan; Waagmeester Andra; Wittenburg Peter; Wolstencroft Katherine; Zhao Jun; Mons BarendScientific data (2016), 3 (), 160018 ISSN:.There is an urgent need to improve the infrastructure supporting the reuse of scholarly data. A diverse set of stakeholders-representing academia, industry, funding agencies, and scholarly publishers-have come together to design and jointly endorse a concise and measureable set of principles that we refer to as the FAIR Data Principles. The intent is that these may act as a guideline for those wishing to enhance the reusability of their data holdings. Distinct from peer initiatives that focus on the human scholar, the FAIR Principles put specific emphasis on enhancing the ability of machines to automatically find and use the data, in addition to supporting its reuse by individuals. This Comment is the first formal publication of the FAIR Principles, and includes the rationale behind them, and some exemplar implementations in the community.
- 274Ubaldi, B. Open Government Data: Towards Empirical Analysis of Open Government Data Initiatives; Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development: 2013. DOI: 10.1787/5k46bj4f03s7-en .There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 275Recommendation of the Council on Enhancing Access to and Sharing of Data; Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2022.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 276Integrated Geospatial Information Framework: A Strategic Guide to Develop and Strengthen National Geospatial Information Management - Part 1: Overarching Strategic Framework; World Bank, United Nations Committee of Experts on Global Geospatial Information Management (UN-GGIM): New York, 2018.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 277UN-GGIM. The Global Statistical Geospatial Framework; United Nations: New York, 2019.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 278Tate, M.; Bongiovanni, I.; Kowalkiewicz, M.; Townson, P. Managing the “Fuzzy front end” of open digital service innovation in the public sector: A methodology. IJIM 2018, 39, 186– 198, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.11.008There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 279Gray, S. J.; Hellman, N.; Ivanova, M. N. Extractive Industries Reporting: A Review of Accounting Challenges and the Research Literature. Abacus 2019, 55 (1), 42– 91, DOI: 10.1111/abac.12147There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 2802017 Resource Governance Index; Natural Resource Governance Institute (NRGI): New York, 2017.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 281Van Alstine, J. Critical reflections on 15 years of the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI). Extr. Ind. Soc. 2017, 4 (4), 766– 770, DOI: 10.1016/j.exis.2017.10.010There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 282EITI Progress Report 2022; Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI): Oslo, Norway, 2022.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 283Proposals for a Relevant and Dynamic EU Sustainability Reporting Standard-Setting; European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG): Brussels, Belgium, 2021.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 284Geels, F. W.; Schwanen, T.; Sorrell, S.; Jenkins, K.; Sovacool, B. K. Reducing energy demand through low carbon innovation: A sociotechnical transitions perspective and thirteen research debates. ERSS 2018, 40, 23– 35, DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2017.11.003There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 285IGF Guidance for Governments: Environmental Management and Mining Governance; Intergovernmental Forum on Mining, Minerals, Metals and Sustainable Development (IGF): Winnipeg, 2021.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 286Vision 2050 - Time to Transform: How business can lead the transformations the world needs; World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD): Geneva, Switzerland, 2021.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 287Transforming Extractive Industries for Sustainable Development; United Nations Executive Office of the Secretary-General (EOSG): New York, 2021. DOI: DOI: 10.18356/27082245-22 .There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 288Berg, F.; Koelbel, J. F.; Rigobon, R. Aggregate confusion: The divergence of ESG ratings. Rev. Financ. 2022, 26 (6), 1315– 1344, DOI: 10.1093/rof/rfac033There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 289Petravatzi, E.; Müller, D. B.; Lundhaug, M.; Liu, G.; Cullen, J.; Simoni, M. U.; Dittrich, M.; Cao, Z.; Murguía, D.; Hirschnitz-Garbers, M.; Hamadová, B. MinFuture Roadmap - A Roadmap Towards Monitoring the Physical Economy; Nottingham, UK, 2018.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 290Fonseca, A.; McAllister, M. L.; Fitzpatrick, P. Measuring what? A comparative anatomy of five mining sustainability frameworks. Miner. Eng. 2013, 46–47, 180– 186, DOI: 10.1016/j.mineng.2013.04.008290https://chemport.cas.org/services/resolver?origin=ACS&resolution=options&coi=1%3ACAS%3A528%3ADC%252BC3sXotl2gtbw%253D&md5=366d4d5d22f9ffa5e12803773b521392Measuring what? A comparative anatomy of five mining sustainability frameworksFonseca, Alberto; McAllister, Mary Louise; Fitzpatrick, PatriciaMinerals Engineering (2013), 46-47 (), 180-186CODEN: MENGEB; ISSN:0892-6875. (Elsevier Ltd.)Recent years have seen a proliferation of frameworks for assessing and reporting mining sustainability. While these frameworks vary substantially in scope and approach, they all seem to share the purported goal of better informing decision-makers about the future implications of mining to the environment and society. Whether they do so, however, remains an open question. The purpose of this paper is to describe, compare and critically analyze five sustainability assessment and reporting frameworks used by, or proposed for, the mining industry. Based on literature reviews, the paper highlights the underlying assumptions of those frameworks and presents a diagram that helps to clarify aspects such as temporal orientation, geog. scope and quantity of indicators. Three out of the five frameworks follow a siloed approach to assessing mining sustainability, overlooking trade-offs and synergies among variables and sustainability dimensions. None of the frameworks seems to fully shed light on the problem of mineral scarcity and the effective legacy of mineral operations. The paper concludes by emphasizing the need to carefully consider the information generated by the analyzed frameworks and suggest more fruitful ways to foster sustainability reports.
- 291General Requirements for Disclosure of Sustainability-related Financial Information. General Requirements Exposure Draft; Exposure Draft IFRS S1 International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB): London, 2022.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 292Haasnoot, M.; Biesbroek, R.; Lawrence, J.; Muccione, V.; Lempert, R.; Glavovic, B. Defining the solution space to accelerate climate change adaptation. Reg. Environ. Change 2020, 20 (2), 37, DOI: 10.1007/s10113-020-01623-8There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 293Giesekam, J.; Norman, J.; Garvey, A.; Betts-Davies, S. Science-Based Targets: On Target?. Sustainability 2021, 13 (4), 1657, DOI: 10.3390/su13041657There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 294Wiek, A.; Binder, C. Solution spaces for decision-making─a sustainability assessment tool for city-regions. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2005, 25 (6), 589– 608, DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2004.09.009There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 295Rockström, J.; Gupta, J.; Lenton, T. M.; Qin, D.; Lade, S. J.; Abrams, J. F.; Jacobson, L.; Rocha, J. C.; Zimm, C.; Bai, X.; Bala, G.; Bringezu, S.; Broadgate, W.; Bunn, S. E.; DeClerck, F.; Ebi, K. L.; Gong, P.; Gordon, C.; Kanie, N.; Liverman, D. M.; Nakicenovic, N.; Obura, D.; Ramanathan, V.; Verburg, P. H.; van Vuuren, D. P.; Winkelmann, R. Identifying a Safe and Just Corridor for People and the Planet. Earth's Future 2021, 9 (4), e2020EF001866 DOI: 10.1029/2020EF001866There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 296European Commission. Directive 2019/1024 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 June 2019 on open data and the re-use of public sector information. Official Journal of the European Union, L 172, 56–83, 2019.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 297European Commission. Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/138 of 21 December 2022 laying down a list of specific high-value datasets and the arrangements for their publication and re-use. Official Journal of the European Union, L 19, 43–75, 2023.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 298Koninkrijk der Nederlanden. Regulation on the National Key Registry for the Subsurface (Regeling basisregistratie ondergrond, BRO). Minister van Binnenlandse Zaken en Koninkrijksrelaties, Nederlande, 2021.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 299Norwegian Petroleum Directorate. Diskos Handbook , Version 2.0; May 2019; Norwegian Petroleum Directorate: Stavanger, Norway, 2019.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 300Olje-og energidepartementet. Forskrift om ressursforvaltning i petroleumsvirksomheten (ressursforskriften). 2021.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 301Kolbjørnsen, O.; Hammer, E.; Pruno, S.; Wellsbury, P.; Kusak, M. In Norwegian Released Wells Project: Study Design, Material Preparation, Measurements and Data Analysis; SPWLA 63rd Annual Logging Symposium, 2022; 2022.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 302Ostrom, E. A General Framework for Analyzing Sustainability of Social-Ecological Systems. Science 2009, 325 (5939), 419– 422, DOI: 10.1126/science.1172133302https://chemport.cas.org/services/resolver?origin=ACS&resolution=options&coi=1%3ACAS%3A528%3ADC%252BD1MXovVCht7k%253D&md5=1bfc7005a7e880f2f91f3f3318336ff2A General Framework for Analyzing Sustainability of Social-Ecological SystemsOstrom, ElinorScience (Washington, DC, United States) (2009), 325 (5939), 419-422CODEN: SCIEAS; ISSN:0036-8075. (American Association for the Advancement of Science)A major problem worldwide is the potential loss of fisheries, forests, and water resources. Understanding of the processes that lead to improvements in or deterioration of natural resources is limited, because scientific disciplines use different concepts and languages to describe and explain complex social-ecol. systems (SESs). Without a common framework to organize findings, isolated knowledge does not cumulate. Until recently, accepted theory has assumed that resource users will never self-organize to maintain their resources and that governments must impose solns. Research in multiple disciplines, however, has found that some government policies accelerate resource destruction, whereas some resource users have invested their time and energy to achieve sustainability. A general framework is used to identify 10 subsystem variables that affect the likelihood of self-organization in efforts to achieve a sustainable SES.
- 303Steffen, W.; Crutzen, P. J.; McNeill, J. R. The Anthropocene: are humans now overwhelming the great forces of nature. Ambio 2007, 36 (8), 614– 621, DOI: 10.1579/0044-7447(2007)36[614:TAAHNO]2.0.CO;2303https://chemport.cas.org/services/resolver?origin=ACS&resolution=options&coi=1%3ACAS%3A528%3ADC%252BD1cXksFSqsrs%253D&md5=e1676aca143489c8d02b751eab9f7e10The Anthropocene: are humans now overwhelming the great forces at nature?Steffen, Will; Crutzen, Paul J.; McNeill, John R.Ambio (2007), 36 (8), 614-621CODEN: AMBOCX; ISSN:0044-7447. (Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences)The development of the Anthropocene, the current epoch in which humans and our societies have become a global geophys. force, is described. The Anthropocene began around 1800 with the onset of industrialization, the central feature of which was the enormous expansion in the use of fossil fuels. Atm. carbon dioxide concn. is suitable as a single, simple indicator to track the progression of the Anthropocene. From a preindustrial value of 270-275 ppm, atm. carbon dioxide had risen to ∼310 ppm by 1950. Since then the human enterprise has experienced a remarkable explosion, the Great Acceleration, with significant consequences for Earth System functioning. Atm. CO2 concn. has risen from 310 to 380 ppm since 1950, with about half of the total rise since the preindustrial era occurring in just the last 30 years. The Great Acceleration is reaching criticality. Whatever unfolds, the next few decades will surely be a tipping point in the evolution of the Anthropocene.
- 304Bateman, I. J.; Mace, G. M. The natural capital framework for sustainably efficient and equitable decision making. Nat. Sustainability 2020, 3 (10), 776– 783, DOI: 10.1038/s41893-020-0552-3There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 305Steffen, W.; Rockström, J.; Richardson, K.; Lenton, T. M.; Folke, C.; Liverman, D.; Summerhayes, C. P.; Barnosky, A. D.; Cornell, S. E.; Crucifix, M.; Donges, J. F.; Fetzer, I.; Lade, S. J.; Scheffer, M.; Winkelmann, R.; Schellnhuber, H. J. Trajectories of the Earth System in the Anthropocene. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2018, 115 (33), 8252– 8259, DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1810141115305https://chemport.cas.org/services/resolver?origin=ACS&resolution=options&coi=1%3ACAS%3A528%3ADC%252BC1cXitVCiurvJ&md5=6a6b33c23839162fb166c1c1e17e0618Trajectories of the Earth System in the AnthropoceneSteffen, Will; Rockstroem, Johan; Richardson, Katherine; Lenton, Timothy M.; Folke, Carl; Liverman, Diana; Summerhayes, Colin P.; Barnosky, Anthony D.; Cornell, Sarah E.; Crucifix, Michel; Donges, Jonathan F.; Fetzer, Ingo; Lade, Steven J.; Scheffer, Marten; Winkelmann, Ricarda; Schellnhuber, Hans JoachimProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (2018), 115 (33), 8252-8259CODEN: PNASA6; ISSN:0027-8424. (National Academy of Sciences)We explore the risk that self-reinforcing feedbacks could push the Earth System toward a planetary threshold that, if crossed, could prevent stabilization of the climate at intermediate temp. rises and cause continued warming on a "Hothouse Earth" pathway even as human emissions are reduced. Crossing the threshold would lead to a much higher global av. temp. than any interglacial in the past 1.2 million years and to sea levels significantly higher than at any time in the Holocene. We examine the evidence that such a threshold might exist and where it might be. If the threshold is crossed, the resulting trajectory would likely cause serious disruptions to ecosystems, society, and economies. Collective human action is required to steer the Earth System away from a potential threshold and stabilize it in a habitable interglacial-like state. Such action entails stewardship of the entire Earth System-biosphere, climate, and societies-and could include decarbonization of the global economy, enhancement of biosphere carbon sinks, behavioral changes, technol. innovations, new governance arrangements, and transformed social values.
- 306Wackernagel, M.; Hanscom, L.; Jayasinghe, P.; Lin, D.; Murthy, A.; Neill, E.; Raven, P. The importance of resource security for poverty eradication. Nat. Sustainability 2021, 4 (8), 731– 738, DOI: 10.1038/s41893-021-00708-4There is no corresponding record for this reference.
Supporting Information
Supporting Information
The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.3c03088.
Materials and methods section describing literature selection and bibliometric analysis; timeline of historical events with reference list; notes on mass balance consistency in financial reporting and the UN System of Environmental-Economic Accounting (PDF)
Terms & Conditions
Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.