ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
Atomic-Level Structural Differences between Fe(III) Coprecipitates Generated by the Addition of Fe(III) Coagulants and by the Oxidation of Fe(II) Coagulants Determine Their Coagulation Behavior in Phosphate and DOM Removal
My Activity

Figure 1Loading Img
    Physico-Chemical Treatment and Resource Recovery

    Atomic-Level Structural Differences between Fe(III) Coprecipitates Generated by the Addition of Fe(III) Coagulants and by the Oxidation of Fe(II) Coagulants Determine Their Coagulation Behavior in Phosphate and DOM Removal
    Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

    • Bingqian Yang
      Bingqian Yang
      State Key Laboratory of Environmental Aquatic Chemistry, Key Laboratory of Drinking Water Science and Technology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, People’s Republic of China
      University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, People’s Republic of China
    • Nigel Graham
      Nigel Graham
      Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London SW7 2AZ, U.K.
      More by Nigel Graham
    • Peng Liu
      Peng Liu
      School of Environmental Studies, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China
      More by Peng Liu
    • Mengjie Liu
      Mengjie Liu
      State Key Laboratory of Environmental Aquatic Chemistry, Key Laboratory of Drinking Water Science and Technology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, People’s Republic of China
      University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, People’s Republic of China
      More by Mengjie Liu
    • John Gregory
      John Gregory
      Department of Civil, Environmental and Geomatic Engineering, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, U.K.
      More by John Gregory
    • Wenzheng Yu*
      Wenzheng Yu
      State Key Laboratory of Environmental Aquatic Chemistry, Key Laboratory of Drinking Water Science and Technology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, People’s Republic of China
      *Email: [email protected]
      More by Wenzheng Yu
    Other Access OptionsSupporting Information (1)

    Environmental Science & Technology

    Cite this: Environ. Sci. Technol. 2023, 57, 33, 12489–12500
    Click to copy citationCitation copied!
    https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c03463
    Published August 8, 2023
    Copyright © 2023 American Chemical Society

    Abstract

    Click to copy section linkSection link copied!
    Abstract Image

    In situ Fe(III) coprecipitation from Fe2+ oxidation is a widespread phenomenon in natural environments and water treatment processes. Studies have shown the superiority of in situ Fe(III) (formed by in situ oxidation of a Fe(II) coagulant) over ex situ Fe(III) (using a Fe(III) coagulant directly) in coagulation, but the reasons remain unclear due to the uncertain nature of amorphous structures. Here, we utilized an in situ Fe(III) coagulation process, oxidizing the Fe(II) coagulant by potassium permanganate (KMnO4), to treat phosphate-containing surface water and analyzed differences between in situ and ex situ Fe(III) coagulation in phosphate removal, dissolved organic matter (DOM) removal, and floc growth. Compared to ex situ Fe(III), flocs formed by the natural oxidizing Fe2+ coagulant exhibited more effective phosphate removal. Furthermore, in situ Fe(III) formed through accelerated oxidation by KMnO4 demonstrated improved flocculation behavior and enhanced removal of specific types of DOM by forming a more stable structure while still maintaining effective phosphate removal. Fe K-edge extended X-ray absorption fine structure spectra (EXAFS) of the flocs explained their differences. A short-range ordered strengite-like structure (corner-linked PO4 tetrahedra to FeO6 octahedra) was the key to more effective phosphorus removal of in situ Fe(III) than ex situ Fe(III) and was well preserved when KMnO4 accelerated in situ Fe(III) formation. Conversely, KMnO4 significantly inhibited the edge and corner coordination between FeO6 octahedra and altered the floc-chain-forming behavior by accelerating hydrolysis, resulting in a more dispersed monomeric structure than ex situ Fe(III). This research provides an explanation for the superiority of in situ Fe(III) in phosphorus removal and highlights the importance of atomic-level structural differences between ex situ and in situ Fe(III) coprecipitates in water treatment.

    Copyright © 2023 American Chemical Society

    Read this article

    To access this article, please review the available access options below.

    Get instant access

    Purchase Access

    Read this article for 48 hours. Check out below using your ACS ID or as a guest.

    Recommended

    Access through Your Institution

    You may have access to this article through your institution.

    Your institution does not have access to this content. Add or change your institution or let them know you’d like them to include access.

    Supporting Information

    Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

    The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.3c03463.

    • Coagulants and raw water properties (Text S1); coagulation experimental process and details (Text S2); kinetic analysis and results of phosphate removal (Text S3); PARAFAC analysis methods and details (Text S4); 2D-COS analysis methods and details (Text S5); wavelet transform analysis methods and details (Text S6); DLVO analysis methods and details (Text S7); wavelet transform analysis of a pure mineral structure (Text S8); shell-fitting analysis methods and details of EXAFS data (Text S9); OpenFluor matches for PARAFAC components (Table S1); peak splitting results of XPS carbon spectra (Table S2); average elemental component results of EDS spectra (Table S3); Fe XANES LCF results for sediment samples (Table S4); Fe EXAFS fitting results (Table S5); coagulation experimental design (Figure S1); kinetics of phosphate removal by different flocs by coprecipitation or adsorption (Figure S2); equilibrium flocculation index (FI) formed by different Fe coagulation systems with/without phosphate (Figure S3); XRD results of nanoparticles formed by different coagulants (Figure S4); TEM results of nanoparticles formed by different coagulants (Figure S5); HRTEM of flocs formed under different conditions (Figure S6); DLVO calculation results (Figure S7); FiUV254 absorbance results in phosphate-containing surface water before and after treatment with different coagulants (Figure S8); fluorescence EEM contours of three PARAFAC components identified from surface water (Figure S9); adsorption model of phosphate on different floc surfaces (Figure S10); high-resolution N XPS spectra of the flocs (Figure S11); high-resolution Fe and C XPS spectra of the flocs (Figure S12); high-resolution P XPS spectra of the flocs (Figure S13); high-resolution Mn XPS spectra of the flocs (Figure S14); EDS-mapping (HAADF) results of nanoparticles formed by different coagulants (Figure S15); EDS-mapping results of nanoparticles formed by different coagulants (Figure S16); wavelet transform results of standard minerals and samples (η = 12 and σ = 1) (Figure S17); wavelet transform results of standard minerals and samples (η = 4 and σ = 1) (Figure S18); and Wavelet Transform results of goethite and Fe-OM (Figure S19) (PDF)

    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

    Cited By

    Click to copy section linkSection link copied!
    Citation Statements
    Explore this article's citation statements on scite.ai

    This article is cited by 18 publications.

    1. Bingnan Song, Renata D. van der Weijden, Chongxuan Liu, Yang Lei. Electrochemical In Situ Production of Magnetite for the Removal of Se from Wastewater. ACS ES&T Water 2024, 4 (10) , 4556-4567. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestwater.4c00579
    2. Qingyun Song, Bingqian Yang, Nigel Graham, Muhammad Saboor Siddique, Shian Song, Wenzheng Yu. The removal preference of Fe(III), Fe(II), and in situ Fe(III) in coagulation when treating NOM and TC. Separation and Purification Technology 2025, 363 , 132180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2025.132180
    3. Zonghui Zhang, Lele Zhao, Jingru Chen, Yuqiong Wang, Yanyan Liu, Xiaohong Hou, Jianhua Qu, Chongning Lv, Qi Hu. Ultra-strong adsorption of ammonia nitrogen from low-temperature and complex systems by Prussian blue analogue. Separation and Purification Technology 2025, 355 , 129700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2024.129700
    4. Yanli Kong, Siyu Dai, Qingwu Chen, Yong Nie, Jiangya Ma. Enhanced oxidation and in-situ coagulation Fe(Ⅱ)/peroxymonosulfate-Mn(Ⅶ) process for carbamazepine removal: Multiple promoting effects of Mn and direct/indirect regulation of Cl− on active substances transformation. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2025, 485 , 136933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.136933
    5. Bingqian Yang, Peng Zhou, Long Tian, Nigel Graham, Guibai Li, Zhaoyang Su, Wenzheng Yu. The nanoscale explanation of metal cations differences in enhancing the Fe(III) coagulation performance. Water Research 2025, 25 , 123524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2025.123524
    6. Zixiang Zhang, Lu Li, Lei Xu, Saijid Rashid, Mengtao Zhang, Wenzheng Yu. Impacts of coagulant types on the treatment efficiency of coal mine wastewater in the ultrafiltration-reverse osmosis process. Journal of Water Process Engineering 2025, 70 , 106911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2024.106911
    7. Xu Xia, Yu-hang Zhou, Ben-Fei Wang, Zhen-yuan Nie, Jin-lan Xia. FeSO4+ drives the H2O-losing transformation of iron(III)-phosphate-bearing secondary minerals with significant effect on immobilization of arsenic in AMD environments. Science of The Total Environment 2025, 959 , 178205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.178205
    8. Chenjun Yang, Qi Li, Xiang Chen, Minjuan Li, Xiangyu He, Gaoxiang Li, Yichun Shao, Jingwei Wu. Effects of the combined use of lanthanum carbonate and activated carbon capping materials on phosphorus and dissolved organic matter in lake sediments. Environmental Research 2025, 264 , 120291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2024.120291
    9. Yaobin Lv, Weizhen Wang, Hongbin Yin. Efficacy of P-sorbent material combined with aquatic plants in controlling nutrient release from urban lake sediment: Field investigation. Environmental Research 2024, 263 , 120233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2024.120233
    10. Jiao Fang, Yande Li, Ming Su, Tengxin Cao, Xufeng Sun, Yufan Ai, Jinyi Qin, Jianwei Yu, Min Yang. Mitigating harmful cyanobacterial blooms in drinking water reservoirs through in-situ sediment resuspension. Water Research 2024, 267 , 122509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2024.122509
    11. Liming Liu, Luna Zhao, Shiyun Jin, Wei Zou, Hongxia Wang, Yu Xie, Changlan Hou, Yunbo Zhai, Pingping Luo. Treatment of sludge hydrothermal carbonization wastewater by ferrous/sodium percarbonate system: Effect of wastewater composition and role of coagulation and oxidation. Water Research 2024, 267 , 122531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2024.122531
    12. Ruining Zhao, Benhang Li, Siyuan Chen, Boxuan Zhang, Jiale Chen, Jiahe Sun, Xiaodong Ma. Intertwined role of mechanism identification by DFT-XAFS and engineering considerations in the evolution of P adsorbents. Science of The Total Environment 2024, 946 , 174159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.174159
    13. Ruixian Kang, Junxia Yu, Xiaodi Li, Li Guo, Chunqiao Xiao, Ruan Chi, Guoqing Feng, Huaqing Xiao. Efficient treatment of glyphosate mother liquor by a coagulation and adsorption combined process. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 2024, 690 , 133811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2024.133811
    14. Shizong Wang, Jianlong Wang. Electron beam radiation coupled to flocculation for advanced treatment of coking and dyeing wastewater: Performance and synergistic effect. Journal of Cleaner Production 2024, 454 , 142344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142344
    15. Mengjie Liu, Xun Liu, Nigel J.D. Graham, Wenzheng Yu. Uncovering the neglected role of anions in trivalent cation-based coagulation processes. Water Research 2024, 254 , 121352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2024.121352
    16. Lili Dong, Yan Li, Xinli Wen, Mingfeng Zhao, Le Zhang, Mengmeng Zhu, Shunli Wan. A new strategy for enhanced phosphate removal from waters using ferric oxide impregnated biochar. Chemical Engineering Journal 2024, 485 , 149953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2024.149953
    17. Xiang Chen, Ling Liu, Yan Wang, Li Zhou, Jing Xiao, Wenming Yan, Minjuan Li, Qi Li, Xiangyu He, Lan Zhang, Xiaohui You, Dongdong Zhu, Jiabao Yan, Bin Wang, Xiaoshuai Hang. The combined effects of lanthanum-modified bentonite and Vallisneria spiralis on phosphorus, dissolved organic matter, and heavy metal(loid)s. Science of The Total Environment 2024, 917 , 170502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.170502
    18. Xiaohui Wang, Yang Li, Xue Wen, Liyan Liu, Lizhi Zhang, Mingce Long. Cooperation of ferrous ions and hydrated ferric oxide for advanced phosphate removal over a wide pH range: Mechanism and kinetics. Water Research 2024, 249 , 120969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2023.120969
    19. Zixiang Zhang, Lei Xu, Sajid Rashid, Mengtao Zhang, Wenzheng Yu. Impact of Coagulant Types on Treatment Efficiency of Coal Mine Wastewater in Ultrafiltration-Reverse Osmosis Processes. 2024https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5011295
    20. Lili Dong, Yan Li, Xinli Wen, Mingfeng Zhao, Le Zhang, Mengmeng Zhu, Shunli Wan. A New Strategy for Enhanced Phosphate Removal from Waters Using Ferric Oxide Impregnated Biochar. 2023https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4676088

    Environmental Science & Technology

    Cite this: Environ. Sci. Technol. 2023, 57, 33, 12489–12500
    Click to copy citationCitation copied!
    https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c03463
    Published August 8, 2023
    Copyright © 2023 American Chemical Society

    Article Views

    2713

    Altmetric

    -

    Citations

    Learn about these metrics

    Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

    Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

    The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.