ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
Aggregation, Adsorption, and Morphological Transformation of Graphene Oxide in Aqueous Solutions Containing Different Metal Cations
My Activity

Figure 1Loading Img
  • Open Access
Article

Aggregation, Adsorption, and Morphological Transformation of Graphene Oxide in Aqueous Solutions Containing Different Metal Cations
Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

View Author Information
Department of Environmental Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Organic Pollution Process and Control, Hangzhou 310058, China
# Stockbridge School of Agriculture, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts 01003, United States
*Phone: 0086-571-88982587. Fax: 0086-571-88982587. E-mail: [email protected]
Open PDFSupporting Information (1)

Environmental Science & Technology

Cite this: Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016, 50, 20, 11066–11075
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b04235
Published September 23, 2016

Copyright © 2016 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under these Terms of Use.

Abstract

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The colloidal behavior of graphene oxide (GO) has been extensively studied in the presence of common environmental cations, but the aggregation, adsorption, and morphological transformation of GO under heavy metal ions have not been investigated. We observed that heavy metal cations (Cr3+, Pb2+, Cu2+, Cd2+, Ag+) destabilized GO suspension more aggressively than common cations (Ca2+, Mg2+, Na+, K+). In addition to electric double-layer (EDL) suppression, heavy metal cations can easily cross the EDL, bind to GO surface, and then change the surface potential, which is a more efficient pathway for GO aggregation. According to aggregation kinetics, the destabilizing ability of cations follows the order of Cr3+ ≫ Pb2+ > Cu2+ > Cd2+ > Ca2+ > Mg2+ ≫ Ag+ > K+ > Na+. The destabilizing capability of metal cations is consistent with their adsorption affinity with GO, which is determined by their electronegativity and hydration shell thickness. GO nanosheets can be transformed to 1D tube-like carbon material, 2D multiple overlapped GO plane, and 3D sphere-like particles during aggregation, thereby combined to form a sphere-like aggregated GO, which is for the first time observed by TEM and AFM images. Therefore, the aggregation of GO 2D nanosheets follows the Schulze-Hardy rule, which is usually used for spherical particles. An integrative process of adsorption-transformation-aggregation is proposed to better understand the nanomaterial (e.g., GO) colloidal behavior, environmental risk, self-assembly process, and application as a novel adsorbent.

Copyright © 2016 American Chemical Society

Introduction

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The discovery of graphene (1-3) has sparked an interest in scientific communities because of its special electrical, (2, 3) optical, (4) and mechanical properties (5) and unique 2D surface. (6) Graphene oxide (GO) is a 2D carbon nanomaterial with abundant oxygen-containing groups (OCGs) at the edge and surface defects. (1, 7) Compared with graphene, GO maintains the excellent characteristics of the 2D structure, aromatic plane, and large surface area and is also much easier to be synthesized, functionalized, and chemically assembled. (7, 8) GO has been applied in various fields, including energy storage, (9, 10) advanced catalysis, (11, 12) sensitive detectors, (13, 14) and environmental pollutant management, (15-23) because of its fantastic characteristics as a precursory material. Due to its various applications and large-scale production, GO release into the environment is inevitable. GO exhibited acute toxicity to microbial communities and harm to human cells. (24-27) GO toxicity is closely related to its size and structure. (26, 27) As a typical amphiphilic material, GO possesses both a hydrophobic aromatic plane and hydrophilic OCGs. GO can be well-dispersed in water and forms a colloid suspension because of the strong electrostatic repulsion originating from the OCG deprotonation. (1, 28) Therefore, it is necessary to investigate the colloidal stability and environmental transport of GO to accurately evaluate its fate and health risk.
As novel carbon nanomaterials, the GO colloid properties have aroused great interest (29-33) and have been extensively studied with common environmental cations (Ca2+, Mg2+, K+, Na+). Chowdhury et al. (29) reported that common cations can induce GO aggregation and that natural organic matter (NOM) can improve GO dispersion. Wu et al. (30) indicated that the pH also influenced the stability of GO and that the aggregation results followed the Schulze-Hardy rule. Though GO is a typical 2D material, its aggregation is well accorded with DLVO sphere–sphere mode, (30, 31) which has not been well explained. The pH, divalent cations, and NOM play complex roles in the fate of GO and reduced GO (rGO). (31) For example, some cations have the same valence, but their destabilizing ability is distinct for GO solution. The critical coagulation concentration (CCC) of Ca2+ for GO suspension is always less than Mg2+. (29, 30) However, a relevant interaction mechanism is still unclear for GO suspension.
In addition to its amphiphilic colloidal properties, GO is also considered an efficient adsorbent for heavy metal ions. (15, 34) Zhao et al. (15) found that few-layered GO has super adsorption capacity to metal ions. Metal cation adsorption on GO is an endothermic and spontaneous process, (15) and cations can be bound to the surface through OCG complexation. (35) For the GO-heavy metal system, the aggregation process is always accompanied by surface adsorption, but the aggregation kinetics and surface adsorption of GO were separately investigated. The linkage between aggregation and surface adsorption needs to be explored to elucidate intrinsic mechanisms of cation-GO interaction.
In contrast to common hard carbon materials, such as carbon nanotubes and fullerene, GO is a special 2D soft plane that is thermodynamically unstable. (1, 3, 36, 37) Its surface morphology can be easily distorted. (22, 38, 39) GO’s microstructure and morphology will further determine its toxicity. Although some studies have focused on the aggregation process of GO, the microstructure transformation during aggregation has not been investigated. The knowledge on microstructure of aggregated GO will be very useful in understanding the GO aggregation process and interaction mechanisms.
In this study, heavy metal cations (Cr3+, Pb2+, Cu2+, Cd2+, and Ag+) and common environmental cations (H+, K+, Na+, Ca2+, and Mg2+) are introduced to systematically investigate the aggregation behavior of GO colloids under a wide range of concentrations. The difference in the cation destabilizing capability is discussed according to their intrinsic electronegativity and hydration shell thickness beyond cation valence. The adsorption behavior of heavy metal onto GO was concurrently monitored with the aggregation process of GO colloids for the first time. The microstructure of the aggregated residues was characterized by TEM and AFM to investigate the aggregation processes.

Materials and Methods

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

GO Synthesis and Characterization

GO was fabricated according to a modified Hummers method described previously. (18, 36) The detailed processes and reagents used are presented in the Supporting Information. The electrophoretic mobility (EPM) and hydrodynamic diameter (Dh) of GO were determined in various solutions, including different cation types (Cr3+, Pb2+, Cu2+, Cd2+, Ca2+, Ma2+, Ag+, K+, Na+) and a wide range of cation concentrations. EPM and Dh were measured by a ZetaSizer Nano ZS following well-established procedures. (29, 30, 40, 41) The GO surface morphology and microstructure transformation during aggregation is examined by transmission electron microscopy (TEM), following standard sample preparation. Atomic force microscope (AFM) is applied to investigate GO physical dimensions and thickness change before and after metal ions interaction. The surface functionalities and the interaction between amphiphilic GO and cations were detected by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR). The detailed processes of the structural characterization and the EPM and Dh variation determination are summarized in the SI.

Aggregation Kinetics of GO

The variation of Dh as a function of cation type and concentration was measured by time-resolved dynamic light scattering (TR-DLS) to identify the destabilization capability and the CCC values of various cations, including common environmental cations and heavy metals. The detailed processes are summarized in the SI.

Adsorption Behavior of Heavy Metals onto GO during Aggregation

Divalent Pb2+, Cu2+, and Cd2+ were chosen as typical heavy metal cations that may have strong affinity to GO and can interact with GO’s surface plane across surrounding EDL. The adsorption conditions were all kept the same as the aggregation experiment to concurrently monitor the aggregation process and adsorption behavior. The processes are detailed in the SI.

Results and Discussion

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Structural Characterization of GO

AFM image analysis (Figure 1A) revealed that GO is an ideal 2D material with a thickness of 1 nm and irregular polygon surrounding. The size of GO is not uniform, and the greatest length in the lateral dimension varies from 200 nm to 1 μm. The ratio of the length to the thickness ranges from 200 to 1000, indicating that GO is far from spherical. According to the TEM image in Figure 1B, GO seems to be a well dispersed monolayer rather than aggregate because of the strong electrostatic repulsion interaction between GO nanoparticles. (28) At the edge of GO plane, several wrinkles are found which are considered as high surface energy sites for pollutant adsorption. (18, 37) FTIR (Figure 1C) revealed that GO possesses abundant functional groups, including −OH, −COOH, and −O–. The large peak at approximately 3400 cm–1 is assigned to −OH, which originates from water, hydroxide, and carboxyl groups. The sharp peaks at 1731, 1621, 1384, 1054, and 833 cm–1 are assigned to C═O, C═C, and C–O–C asymmetric stretching and C–O–H and C–O–C bending motion, respectively. (38, 39)

Figure 1

Figure 1. AFM (A), TEM (B), and FTIR (C) characterization of GO.

Electrokinetic and Hydrodynamic Properties of GO

As presented in Figure 2A1, GO was negatively charged from pH 1 to 12, and the isoelectric point was below pH 1. GO’s EPM and Dh are insensitive at high pH range (pH 3 to 12). The EPM of GO changed gently, and Dh remained relatively unchanged around ∼280 nm from pH 3 to 12 (Figure 2A2); but once H+ concentrations are in excess of 1 mmol/L (pH < 3), EPM and Dh all change sharply. The EPM of GO increases sharply from −3.13 × 10–8 to −0.13 × 10–8 m2 V–1 S–1 when pH decreased from 3 to 1. The Dh change is followed by size variation from 280 to 7360 nm with pH 2.4 to 1.12. The followed variation of Dh behind EPM indicates GO aggregation with H+ is mainly an electrostatic repulsive force reduction process. Similar electrokinetic behavior of carbon-based nanomaterials, i.e., carbon nanotubes, (40) fullerenes, (41) graphene oxide, (29) and reduced graphene oxide, (31) with solution pH has also been observed. Because the pH in aquatic environments usually ranges from 5 to 9, the released GO colloid should be stable and easily transported in the aquatic environment if not taking into account the influence of the coexisting metal cations.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Electrophoretic mobility (EPM) and hydrodynamic diameter of GO as a function of the cation concentration of H+ (A1, A2), monovalent metal cations (B1, B2), divalent metal cations (C1, C2), and trivalent metal cations (D1, D2).

The electrokinetic and hydrodynamic properties of GO as a function of the concentration of monovalent, divalent, and trivalent cations are shown in Figure 2. The surface zeta potential derived from EPM is presented in Figure S1. GO was highly negatively charged in deionized water with a zeta potential of −66 mV (Figure S1), which made it stable in water with Dh = ∼280 nm. Comparing the destabilizing ability of different valent cations, Cr3+ displayed the most aggressive influence on the EPM and the hydrodynamic size of GO in the aqueous suspension and then followed by divalent cations and then by monovalent cations. As predicted by the Schulze-Hardy rule, the higher valence the cations are, the higher charge screening capability the cations process.
Further analysis revealed that EPM and Dh curves depend not only mainly on cations’ valence but also highly on cations’ types though they possess the same valence. As presented in Figure 2B1,C1, GO EPM was constant, and the differences were negligible before the EPM inflection point for the same valent cations. The electrolyte concentrations at the EPM inflection point were 0.9, 0.08, and 0.002 mmol/L for monovalent, divalent, and trivalent cations, respectively; but once concentrations are in excess of their EPM inflection point, the GO EPM increased notably, and significant differences appear from the same valent cations comparison. The EPM variation intensity of GO is also distinct during low, middle, and high concentration ranges which is especially obvious for divalent and trivalent cations. The EPM variation intensity of GO at high concentration (>0.08 mmol/L) is weaker than at concentration ranges of 0.008–0.08 mmol/L for divalent cations, indicating multiple interactions are involved besides EDL suppression (Figure 2C1). Comparing with EMP variation, an obvious Dh change is always detected at higher concentration followed by EPM. For monovalent cations, the cation concentration at the EPM inflection point (CEPM) was 0.9 mmol/L and increased to 20, 12, and 8 mmol/L for Na+, K+, and Ag+ respectively, at the Dh inflection point (CDh). For divalent cations, CEPM was 0.008 mmol/L, and CDh increased to 0.4, 0.3, 0.3, 0.2, and 0.08 mmol/L for Mg2+, Ca2+, Cd2+, Cu2+, and Pb2+, respectively. For Cr3+CDh = 0.008 mmol/L is also 4 times higher than CEPM = 0.002 mmol/L. The ratio of CDh/CEPM was 200, 120, and 80 for Na+, K+, and Ag+, 50, 38, 38, 25, and 10 for Mg2+, Ca2+, Cd2+, Cu2+, and Pb2+, and 4 for Cr3+. The CDh/CEPM ratio decreased from 200 to 80 for monovalent cations to 50–10 for divalent cations and then to 4 for Cr3+. The reduced concentration gap between CEPM and CDh with the increase in cation valence suggested that the charge screening effect of GO induced by higher valence cations contributed more to the GO aggregation, and the difference of CDh for the same valent cations reveals GO aggregation is also dependent on cation types which is beyond the traditional Schulze-Hardy rule. According to the Dh variation, GO will be stable and have strong migration potential in environmental water, because K+ and Na+ concentrations in most natural water are less than 10 mmol/L. Among the common environmental divalent cations, Ca2+ and Mg2+ are more aggressive in GO destabilization. The aggregation of GO in the presence of heavy metal cations was much more significant than the common cations.
To test real coagulation phenomena of GO, Figure 3 presents a direct visual demonstration of the GO flocculation situation after 12 h in the presence of different cation types and concentrations. The GO concentration was controlled at 0.04 mg/mL, which was consistent with the aggregation experiments. GO is well-dispersed in water and low concentration cation electrolyte solutions. When the cation concentration reached a critical concentration, i.e., 10 mmol/L for Ag+, 20 mmol/L for K+, 30 mmol/L for Na+, 0.2 mmol/L for Pb2+, 0.3 mmol/L for Pb2+, 0.4 mmol/L for Cu2+, 0.5 mmol/L for Cd2+, 0.4 mmol/L for Ca2+, 0.7 mmol/L for Mg2+, and 0.045 mmol/L for trivalent Cr3+, visible coagulation appeared which also indicates metal cations can be used as a flocculent for GO recovery. The bulk precipitation phenomena in Figure 3 are consistent with the corresponding changes of the EPM and Dh with cation concentration in Figure 2. Similarly, the destabilization capability of cations to GO followed the order of Cr3+ ≫ Pb2+ > Cu2+ > Cd2+ > Ca2+ > Mg2+ ≫ Ag+ > K+ > Na+. Based on the Schulze-Hardy rule, (42, 43) the same valent cations should produce similar charge screening effects. In our study, however, heavy metal cations displayed a more aggressive ability in GO aggregation: Pb2+, Cu2+, Cd2+ > Ca2+, Mg2+, and Ag + > K +, Na+. The difference in the destabilizing ability for equivalent cations indicated that GO aggregation is a more complex process than just the EDL suppression mechanism.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Bulk flocculation of GO in aqueous solution containing monovalent cations (A), divalent cations (B), and trivalent cations (C) with different concentrations to determine their destabilization capability.

Aggregation Kinetics of GO

A typical GO aggregation kinetics profile as a function of K+ concentration is presented in Figure 4 (A) and as a function of Na+, Ag+, Mg2+, Ca2+, Cd2+, Cu2+, Pb2+, and Cr3+ in Figure S2. The aggregation rate increases with the enhancement of EDL repulsion screening of the cation concentration. The GO attachment efficiency (α) was determined from the aggregation kinetic profiles for different nitrate salts. Once the solution reaches the critical coagulation concentration (CCC) (e.g., 28 mmol/L for K+), thermal diffusion is the main limitation for GO aggregation instead of energy-barrier repulsion. The reaction-limited and diffusion-limited regimes of GO in monovalent, divalent, and trivalent cations are presented in Figure 4 (B, C, D), indicating that GO aggregation is in general agreement with the DLVO theory.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Effects of cation type and cation concentration on GO aggregation. Typical aggregation kinetics of GO at different K+ concentrations (A). Attachment efficiency (α) of GO as a function of monovalent cation concentration (B), divalent cation concentration (C), and trivalent cation concentration (D).

Attachment efficiency (α) is used to normalize the aggregation kinetics. The α value increased quickly from 1% to 100% with a decrease in EDL repulsion in the reaction-limited regime. The CCC values for different cations are determined from the intersection of the reaction-limited and diffusion-limited fitting lines, which indicate the total suppression of EDL, and are summarized in Table 1. For the common environmental cations, the CCC values of GO were 36 mmol/L for Na+, 28 mmol/L for K+, 1.50 mmol/L for Mg2+, and 1.35 mmol/L for Ca2+ which is similar to previous reported CCC values (44 mmol/L Na+, 1.3 mmol/L Mg2+, and 0.9 mmol/L Ca2+). (29) For valence equivalent cations, the CCC values of the heavy metals were significantly lower than the corresponding common cations, i.e., CCCAg (19 mmol/L) < CCCK (28 mmol/L) < CCCNa (36 mmol/L), CCCPb (0.300 mmol/L) < CCCCu (0.725 mmol/L) < CCCCd (1.300 mmol/L) ≈ CCCCa (1.350 mmol/L) < CCCMg (1.500 mmol/L). The CCC values of nanomaterials such as GO for heavy metal ions are first reported in the current study. The reaction-limited and diffusion-limited regions are the concentration ranges before and after the CCC that represent the different flocculation processes. According to the Schulze-Hardy rule, the CCC ratio of contra-ion should be Z–6 for well-dispersed colloids (Z is the valence of the ions). By normalizing the CCC to CCCNa, we can see that CCCNa:CCCK:CCCAg:CCCMg:CCCCa:CCCCd:CCCCu:CCCPb:CCCCr = 1:0.778:0.528:2–4.6:2–4.7:2–4.8:2–5.6:2–6.9:3–5.5. The CCC ratio of divalent and trivalent cations to CCCNa is almost proportional to Z–6, indicating that the GO aggregation process is generally consistent with the Schulze-Hardy rule, although GO is not a spherical colloid. The Schulze-Hardy rule is an experimentally empirical formula that is only suitable to describe the aggregation originating from double-layer compression. Theoretically, the cations with the same valence should display the same destabilization capability. (42, 43) However, the CCC values of GO for equivalent cations are distinct, which indicates that the flocculation behavior of GO with the same valent cations is beyond just the EDL suppression and additional mechanisms are involved.
Table 1. Physicochemical Properties of the Tested Cations and Their Critical Coagulation Concentrations (CCC) for Graphene Oxide (GO)
metal cationsionic radius (Å) (51, 52)hydration shell thickness (Å) (51, 52)electronegativity (53)CCC (mmol/L)ratio of CCC to CCCNa
Na+0.952.630.93361
K+1.331.980.82280.778
Ag+1.262.151.93190.528
Mg2+0.653.631.311.502–4.585
Ca2+0.993.131.011.3502–4.737
Cd2+0.973.291.691.3002–4.791
Cu2+0.723.471.900.7252–5.634
Pb2+1.322.692.330.3002–6.907
Cr3+0.643.481.660.0853–5.506

Adsorption of Heavy Metal Cations onto GO

In addition to double-layer compression, the adsorption (binding) of metal cations onto nanosheets was suggested as a potential mechanism for the aggregation of graphene oxide. For example, the more effective destabilization of Ca2+ compared to Mg2+ on GO in aquatic environments was attributed to the strong binding of Ca2+ ions with hydroxyl and carbonyl functional groups on GO surfaces in comparison with Mg2+. (29) However, along with aggregation, the adsorption behavior of metal cations has not been investigated quantitatively. The adsorption isotherms of Pb2+, Cu2+, and Cd2+ are plotted in Figure 5A. The relationship between EPM and the adsorption of GO with metal cation concentration is presented in Figure 5B.

Figure 5

Figure 5. Isotherms of Pb2+, Cu2+, and Cd2+ onto GO during the aggregation process (A) and relationship between EPM and the adsorption of GO (B).

The adsorption isotherm is an in situ reflection of the flocculation process. At the same equilibrium concentration of 0.06 mmol/L in pH = 4.5 solution, the magnitude of the adsorption capacity of metal ions followed the order of Pb2+ (0.710 mmol/g) > Cu2+ (0.655 mmol/g) > Cd2+ (0.566 mmol/g) (Table S1). Adsorption capacity of GO is much higher than other adsorbents, (44) such as oxidized carbon nanotubes, (45) activated carbon, (46) biochar, (47) and biosorbent. (48) According to the regression coefficient (R2) (Table S1), the isotherms of cations are well fitted by the Freundlich model, which means that the adsorption sites on the GO surface are heterogeneously distributed. The Freundlich N index followed the order of Pb2+ (0.174) < Cu2+ (0.225) < Cd2+ (0.254). The strongest interaction affinity between cation and GO is Pb2+, followed by Cu2+ and Cd2+, which is consistent with their destabilizing ability. The correlations indicated that GO aggregation which cannot be explained by EDL suppression may be related to surface adsorption. For the GO-cation system, the adsorption region was mainly located at the initial concentrations of 0.01–0.10 mmol/L (removal efficiency, r%, between 20 and 80%) (Figure 5 B) which precisely corresponds to the fast increase region of GO’s EPM with cation concentration. This phenomenon demonstrates that adsorption is more efficient with the EPM change and triggers the aggregation of GO.

Interaction Mechanisms of Metal Cations with GO

FTIR spectra can reflect the electronic contributions and functional group variations of GO through nonadiabatic interactions, (38) which can be further employed to analyze the interaction between cations and adsorption sites on the GO surface. The FTIR spectra of GO before and after the influence of different cations are presented in Figure S3A. H+ does not influence the GO groups, and the aggregation is induced by EDL compression only. With the presence of metal cations, the binding motion of epoxy groups (C–O–C) (Figure S3B) presented an obvious enhancement and wavelength shift. These variations indicate that the epoxy groups take part in metal cation capture. In addition to epoxy groups, peaks also appeared between 1800 and 1750 cm–1 next to the carboxyl (C═O) (Figure S3C and D), which may originate from the protonation of carboxyl after cation combination. (49) As reported, heavy metal cations preferably combine with high energy sites such as OCGs. (15, 29, 30, 34) Moreover, cations can also interact with GO’s aromatic framework through cation-π interactions. The FTIR spectra revealed that the C═C stretching peak of GO shifted from 1621 cm–1 to 1629, 1623, and 1620 cm–1 in the presence of Na+, K+, and Ag+, respectively. The variation of the C═C stretching peak of GO is more obvious after interacting with divalent cations and shifted from 1621 cm–1 for the original GO to 1634 (Mg2+), 1627 (Ca2+), 1617 (Cd2+), 1614 (Cu2+), and 1597 cm–1 (Pb2+). Induced by the binding of heavy metals, the vibration energy level of C═C followed the order of Na+ > K+ > Ag+ for monovalent cations and Mg2+ > Ca2+ > Cd2 +> Cu2+ > Pb2+ for divalent cations. These sequences are in line with their destabilization ability (hydration shell of the metal ions). The changes in C═C stretching of GO indicate that the adsorbed cations can pass through the EDL and directly interact with the GO plane.
The classic Schulze-Hardy rule can explain the discrepancy of aggregation between different valence cations but cannot explain the difference among equivalent cations. The flocculation ability of metal cations is also influenced by the corresponding adsorption capability of the GO nanosheets via surface binding mechanisms. As evidenced in the FTIR spectra (Figure S3), metal cations can be bonded to the hydrophobic aromatic surface through cation-π interactions in addition to binding to OCGs and electrostatic attractions. In previous studies, OCG bonding and cation-π bonding are considered as a donor–acceptor or charge-transfer interaction, which is also an electrostatic interaction that has a dominant effect for most reaction systems. (50) The cation-π interaction energy is mainly dependent on the electronegativity of metal cations over the center of the aromatic plane. (50) The physicochemical characteristics (51-53) of the tested cations are listed in Table 1. The electronegativity is an index used to evaluate their electron attraction capability, which is determined by the atom’s intrinsic electronic density and distribution. The electronegativity of monovalent cations follows the order of Ag+ > Na+ > K+ and is Pb2+ > Cu2+ > Cd2+ > Mg2+ > Ca2+ for divalent cations, which is consistent with their destabilization ability for GO suspensions, except Na+ > K+ and Mg2+ > Ca2+. Therefore, both aggregation and adsorption of GO were influenced by the interaction between cations and GO, which was mainly determined by the electronegativity of the metal cations.
To elucidate the interface interaction between cations and GO in aqueous solution, it is important to consider the influence of water molecules. (50, 54, 55) Water is a dipole molecule, and water molecules will align themselves around ions to form a hydration shell due to polarity. (51) For example, metal cations are surrounded by H2O via the negative end of oxygen. The primary inner hydration shell is well-ordered and bonded through tight hydrogen bonds. The outer shell is diffused with less bonding energy. The bonded water shell shields the electronegativity of the cation through dipole interactions and then further excludes the cation benzene interaction distance and further reduces the bonding affinity of heavy cations with OCGs and the aromatic plane. (50, 54, 55) The hydration radius is determined by the ion radii and its electrostatic potential. The hydration shell thickness of Na+ (2.62 Å) is higher than K+ (1.98 Å), and Mg2+ (3.63 Å) is also higher than Ca2+ (3.13 Å), which is why the flocculation ability follows the sequence of K+ > Na+ and Ca2+ > Mg2+, which is not consistent with their electronegativity. The hydration shell thickness weakens the affinity of metal cations with GO. Therefore, adsorption and aggregation potentials of GO are jointly determined by the electronegativity and hydration shell thickness of the metal cations.

The Microstructure of GO Flocculation

Few studies have focused on the microstructure change of GO under cation influence, which is critical in understanding the potential development of GO aggregates. In this study, two typical cations are selected. Cd2+ is selected as a typical heavy metal cation which has strong affinity to GO and can directly interact with GO surface via crossing EDL. Mg2+ is present as a common environmental cation that has weak affinity to GO and mainly destabilizes GO through EDL suppression instead of surface adsorption. The observed concentration of Cd2+ (0.40 mmol/L) and Mg2+ (0.70 mmol/L) is set at a critical aggregation point, at which the aggregation of GO initially occurs, and the structural transformation is easily monitored.
The microstructure of GO with Cd2+ is presented in Figure 6. Comparing with the well dispersed monolayer case, GO nanosheets are initiated to flocculate, and tight and sphere-like aggregates (diameter ≈ 1 μm) are formed with small, curled GO nanosheets accumulating around (Figure 6A). In addition to the tight 3D bulk GO, unique 1D carbon tube-like structures with open end-caps are found (length ≈ 1.5 μm and width ≈ 0.5 μm), and the dispersed GO displayed 1D needle-like structures with length ≈ 0.5 μm (Figure 6 B, C). The large tube-like structure seems to originate from multiple GO crispation, and the small size, needle-like structure curled to form a GO small fractal sheet. Comparing the size of 1D tube-like and needle-like structures, the final size of the aggregate is mainly determined by its initial dimensions of GO sheets. Surprisingly, well-formed 1D tube-like, 2D multiple folded, and 3D bulk GO microstructures are all found under TEM investigation (Figure 6 D, E, F). More detailed TEM images of the GO aggregate microstructure are presented in Figure S4 to verify the widespread structural transformation. (56-58) These TEM images confirmed that the aggregation of the GO suspension is not only an accumulative process via EDL suppression but also accompanied by structural transformation of GO into 1D, 2D, and 3D nanomaterials.

Figure 6

Figure 6. TEM and AFM images of the GO flocculate during aggregation with the presence of Cd2+. TEM images of aggregated GO (A), magnified version (B), with small size curled GO in the dispersed situation (C), with a typical 1D tube-like structure (D), with a 2D multiple folded structure (E), and a 3D tightly aggregated structure (F). AFM images of flocculated GO (G, H). G1 and H1 show the testing line height in parts G and H, respectively.

The microstructure of the GO aggregate under Cd2+ is further detected by AFM which is also consistent with the TEM investigation. A seriously aggregated flocculate of GO was formed with some dispersed tube-like GO attached (Figure 6G). The edge of 2D GO is more regular relative to the original GO nanosheets (Figure 6H). The piled 2D plane is 3–5 nm in height (Figure 6H1), which equals 3–5 overlapped layers. Different from the microstructure of GO induced by Cd2+, the GO structure under Mg2+ inducement is not multifarious (Figure S5) as it cannot cross EDL and adsorption on the GO plane. Part of GO initially comes into a formless gel-like aggregate (Figure S5A–C) followed by Mg2+ EDL suppression. Except for the gel-like structure, a large part of aggregates is 3D sphere-like bulk with different sizes (diameter from 0.4–0.8 μm) (Figure S5D–F) which may originate from the unit of gel-like structures. The small size aggregate will further accumulate with surrounding interaction (Figure S5G), and larger size sphere bulk agglomerates are formed beyond the small size (diameter around 2 μm) (Figure S5H,I). Comparing with Mg2+, Cd2+ can get across through EDL and directly interact with GO’s surface plane so the different and diverse microstructures under Cd2+ might be induced by direct cation’s surface interaction. The ideal 2D monolayer GO can be transformed to a 3D sphere-like structure under both heavy metal ions and common cations, which is why GO aggregation can well accord with the DLVO sphere–sphere model.
Compared with graphene, GO can be well-dispersed in water solution and remain more stable because of the interelectric repulsion and hydrogen bonding with water. Heavy metal cations can cross the EDL barrier and coordinate with OCGs to accept the unpaired electron to reduce the deformation barrier and neutralize the surface charge of GO. In addition to OCGs coordination, cations can further interact with the aromatic plane via a cation-π complex and supply a directional inducement for microstructure transformation. Our study is the first observation that the 2D GO nanosheets can be rolled into 1D carbon nanotube-like material, 2D multiplied structure, and 3D sphere bulk under the inducement of heavy metals which may be helpful in understanding the self-assembly and microstructure manipulation of GO.
We suggest the adsorption of heavy metals with GO nanosheets (process I), the formation of 1D-, 2D-, and 3D-like structures (process II), and the aggregation of sphere-like flocculate (process III) are three aspects of the interaction of GO with heavy metal cations, which are schematically demonstrated in Figure 7. One cation can interact with 1–3 aromatic planes of the graphene nanosheets through cation × 1π, cation × 2π, and cation × 3π. (50, 59-63) This electronic interaction is strong enough to deform the benzene ring. (59, 60) Strong cation-π interactions bend and roll the aromatic plane of GO and form a more thermodynamically favorable 1D tube-like structure, when cations interact with the GO nanoplane in a certain direction (Figure 7, process II). As a result, the hydrophilicity and negative charges of GO particles weaken. In addition to the common cation-π interaction model, cations can induce aromatic planes to form a π × cation × π structure (i.e., cation × 2π). (61, 62) Cation × 2π strengthens the π–π interactions and further governs the macromolecular structure. (63) Cations can link or induce aromatic planes to form face-to-face multiplied structures through cation × 2π (Figure 7, process II). Furthermore, strong cation clusters can attract aromatic planes in all directions to form a novel interaction of cation × 3π. As a result, multi- or monolayer GO nanosheets assemble around the cation cluster by forming a cation × 3π cage-like structure (Figure 7, process II). In contrast, except for the cation × 3π inducement, the 3D GO bulk aggregate can be formed with the presence of Mg2+ via EDL suppression because Mg2+ displayed weak affinity to the GO plane. The combined interactions of strong π–π interactions and cation × 3π between aromatic planes can activate 2D graphene oxide into a tight sphere-like 3D aggregation, as shown in the AFM images of Figures 6G and 6H. Following EDL suppression during the aggregation, 1D, 2D, and 3D structures accumulate and combine to form a sphere-like aggregated GO (Figure 7, process III). With the proposed adsorption-structural transformation-aggregation processes (Figure 7), the 2D GO nanosheets were converted into spherical colloids in the presence of heavy metals, which is a potential reason why aggregation of the GO nanosheets also follows the DLVO sphere–sphere mode. This study strongly suggests that the adsorption, structural transformation, and aggregation should be considered together to precisely elucidate the colloidal behavior and environmental transport of nanomaterials such as graphene oxide, carbon nanotubes, and fullerene.

Figure 7

Figure 7. Proposed interactions of heavy metal cations with GO nanosheets in three steps: (I) adsorption of heavy metal onto GO nanosheets; (II) formation of 1D-, 2D-, and 3D-like structures; and (III) aggregation of sphere-like flocculation.

Supporting Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.6b04235.

  • Material and methods, surface zeta potential (Figure S1), aggregation kinetics of GO (Figure S2), FT-IR spectra of GO and GO aggregate induced by different cations (Figure S3), and TEM images of GO (Figures S4 and S5) (PDF)

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

  • Corresponding Author
    • Baoliang Chen - Department of Environmental Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, ChinaZhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Organic Pollution Process and Control, Hangzhou 310058, China Email: [email protected]
  • Authors
    • Kaijie Yang - Department of Environmental Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, ChinaZhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Organic Pollution Process and Control, Hangzhou 310058, China
    • Xiaoying Zhu - Department of Environmental Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, ChinaZhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Organic Pollution Process and Control, Hangzhou 310058, China
    • Baoshan Xing - Stockbridge School of Agriculture, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts 01003, United States
  • Notes
    The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgment

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This project was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant 21537005, 21425730, and 21277120) and the National Basic Research Program of China (Grant 2014CB441106).

References

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article references 63 other publications.

  1. 1
    Dreyer, D. R.; Park, S. J.; Bielawski, C. W.; Ruoff, R. S. The chemistry of graphene oxide Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39, 228 240 DOI: 10.1039/B917103G
  2. 2
    Zhang, Y. B.; Tan, Y. W.; Stormer, H. L.; Kim, P. Experimental observation of the quantum Hall effect and Berry’s phase in graphene Nature 2005, 438, 201 204 DOI: 10.1038/nature04235
  3. 3
    Novoselov, K. S.; Geim, A. K.; Morozov, S. V.; Jiang, D.; Zhang, Y.; Dubonos, S. V.; Grigorieva, I. V.; Firsov, A. A. Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films Science 2004, 306, 666 669 DOI: 10.1126/science.1102896
  4. 4
    Nair, R. R.; Blake, P.; Grigorenko, A. N.; Novoselov, K. S.; Booth, T. J.; Stauber, T.; Peres, N. M. R.; Geim, A. K. Fine structure constant defines visual transparency of graphene Science 2008, 320, 1308 DOI: 10.1126/science.1156965
  5. 5
    Lee, C.; Wei, X. D.; Kysar, J. W.; Hone, J. Measurement of the elastic properties and intrinsic strength of monolayer graphene Science 2008, 321, 385 388 DOI: 10.1126/science.1157996
  6. 6
    Loh, K. P.; Bao, Q. L.; Ang, P. K.; Yang, J. X. The chemistry of graphene J. Mater. Chem. 2010, 20, 2277 2289 DOI: 10.1039/b920539j
  7. 7
    Chen, D.; Feng, H. B.; Li, J. H. Graphene oxide: Preparation, functionalization, and electrochemical applications Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 6027 6053 DOI: 10.1021/cr300115g
  8. 8
    Chua, C. K.; Pumera, M. Chemical reduction of graphene oxide: A synthetic chemistry viewpoint Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 291 312 DOI: 10.1039/C3CS60303B
  9. 9
    Zhu, J. X.; Zhu, T.; Zhou, X. Z.; Zhang, Y. Y.; Lou, X. W.; Chen, X. D.; Zhang, H.; Hng, H. H.; Yan, Q. Y. Facile synthesis of metal oxide/reduced graphene oxide hybrids with high lithium storage capacity and stable cyclability Nanoscale 2011, 3, 1084 1089 DOI: 10.1039/C0NR00744G
  10. 10
    Stoller, M. D.; Park, S. J.; Zhu, Y. W.; An, j.; Ruoff, R. S. Graphene-based ultracapacitors Nano Lett. 2008, 8, 3498 3502 DOI: 10.1021/nl802558y
  11. 11
    Lightcap, I. V.; Kosel, T. H.; Kamat, P. V. Anchoring semiconductor and metal nanoparticles on a two-dimensional catalyst mat. storing and shuttling electrons with reduced graphene oxide Nano Lett. 2010, 10, 577 583 DOI: 10.1021/nl9035109
  12. 12
    Scheuermann, G. M.; Rumi, L. G.; Steurer, P.; Bannwarth, W.; Mülhaupt, R. Palladium Nanoparticles on graphite oxide and its functionalized graphene derivatives as highly active catalysts for the Suzuki-Miyaura coupling reaction J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 8262 8270 DOI: 10.1021/ja901105a
  13. 13
    Song, H. J.; Zhang, L. C.; He, C. L.; Qu, Y.; Tian, Y. F.; Lv, Y. Graphene sheets decorated with SnO2 nanoparticles: In situ synthesis and highly efficient materials for cataluminescence gas sensors J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 5972 5977 DOI: 10.1039/c0jm04331a
  14. 14
    Chitara, B.; Panchakarla, L. S.; Krupanidhi, S. B.; Rao, C. N. R. Infrared photodetectors based on reduced graphene oxide and graphene nanoribbons Adv. Mater. 2011, 23, 5419 5424 DOI: 10.1002/adma.201101414
  15. 15
    Zhao, G. X.; Li, J. X.; Ren, X. M.; Chen, C. L.; Wang, X. K. Few-Layered Graphene Oxide nanosheets as superior sorbents for heavy metal ion pollution management Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45, 10454 10462 DOI: 10.1021/es203439v
  16. 16
    Zhao, G. X.; Jiang, L.; He, Y. D.; Li, J. X.; Dong, H. L.; Wang, X. K.; Hu, W. P. Sulfonated grapheme for persistent aromatic pollutant management Adv. Mater. 2011, 23, 3959 3963 DOI: 10.1002/adma.201101007
  17. 17
    Yang, K.; Chen, B.; Zhu, L. Graphene-coated materials using silica particles as a framework for highly efficient removal of aromatic pollutants in water Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 11641 DOI: 10.1038/srep11641
  18. 18
    Yang, K.; Wang, J.; Chen, B. Facile fabrication of stable monolayer and few layer graphene nanosheets as superior sorbents for persistent aromatic pollutant management in water J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 18219 18224 DOI: 10.1039/C4TA04300F
  19. 19
    Shen, Y.; Fang, Q.; Chen, B. Environmental applications of three-dimensional graphene-based macrostructures: Adsorption, transformation and detection Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49, 67 84 DOI: 10.1021/es504421y
  20. 20
    Shen, Y.; Chen, B. Sulfonated graphene nanosheets as a superb adsorbent for various environmental pollutants in water Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49, 7364 7372 DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b01057
  21. 21
    Ji, L.; Chen, W.; Xu, Z.; Zheng, S.; Zhu, D. Graphene nanosheets and graphite oxide as promising adsorbents for removal of organic contaminants from aqueous solution Journal of Environment Quality 2013, 42, 191 198 DOI: 10.2134/jeq2012.0172
  22. 22
    Wang, J.; Chen, Z.; Chen, B. Adsorption of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by graphene and graphene oxide nanosheets Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48, 4817 4825 DOI: 10.1021/es405227u
  23. 23
    Chen, X.; Chen, B. Macroscopic and spectroscopic investigations on adsorption of nitroaromatic compounds to graphene oxide, and reduced graphene oxide and graphene nanosheets Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49, 6181 6189 DOI: 10.1021/es5054946
  24. 24
    Bianco, A. Graphene: safe or toxic? The two faces of the medal Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 4986 4997 DOI: 10.1002/anie.201209099
  25. 25
    Akhavan, O.; Ghaderi, E.; Emamy, H.; Akhavan, F. Genotoxicity of graphene nanoribbons in human mesenchymal stem cells Carbon 2013, 54, 419 431 DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2012.11.058
  26. 26
    Akhavan, O.; Ghaderi, E. Toxicity of graphene and graphene oxide nanowalls against bacteria ACS Nano 2010, 4, 5731 5736 DOI: 10.1021/nn101390x
  27. 27
    Akhavan, O.; Ghaderi, E.; Akhavan, A. Size-dependent genotoxicity of graphene nanoplatelets in human stem cells Biomaterials 2012, 33, 8017 8025 DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.07.040
  28. 28
    Li, D.; Müller, M. B.; Gilje, S. L.; Kaner, R. B.; Wallace, G. G. Processable aqueous dispersions of graphene nanosheets Nat. Nanotechnol. 2008, 3, 101 105 DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2007.451
  29. 29
    Chowdhury, I.; Duch, M. C.; Mansukhani, N. D.; Hersam, M. C.; Bouchard, D. Colloidal properties and stability of graphene oxide nanomaterials in the aquatic environment Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47, 6288 6296 DOI: 10.1021/es400483k
  30. 30
    Wu, L.; Liu, L.; Gao, B.; Muňoz-Carpena, R.; Zhang, M.; Chen, H.; Zhou, Z. H.; Wang, H. Aggregation kinetics of graphene oxides in aqueous solutions: Experiments, mechanisms, and modeling Langmuir 2013, 29, 15174 15181 DOI: 10.1021/la404134x
  31. 31
    Chowdhury, I.; Mansukhani, N. D.; Guiney, L. M.; Hersam, M. C.; Bouchard, D. Aggregation and stability of reduced graphene oxide: Complex roles of divalent cations, pH, and natural organic matter Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49, 10886 10893 DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b01866
  32. 32
    Hong, B. J.; Compton, O. C.; An, Z.; Eryazici, I.; Nguyen, S. T. Successful stabilization of graphene oxide in electrolyte solutions: Enhancement of biofunctionalization and cellular uptake ACS Nano 2012, 6, 63 73 DOI: 10.1021/nn202355p
  33. 33
    Ren, X. M.; Li, J. X.; Tan, X. L.; Shi, W. Q.; Chen, C. L.; Shao, D. D.; Wen, T.; Wang, L. F.; Zhao, G. X.; Sheng, G. P.; Wang, X. K. Impact of Al2O3 on the aggregation and deposition of grapheme oxide Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48, 5493 5500 DOI: 10.1021/es404996b
  34. 34
    Yang, S. T.; Chang, Y. L.; Wang, H. F.; Liu, G. B.; Chen, S.; Wang, Y. W.; Liu, Y. F.; Cao, A. Folding/aggregation of graphene oxide and its application in Cu2+ removal J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2010, 351, 122 127 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2010.07.042
  35. 35
    Wang, J.; Chen, B. Adsorption and coadsorption of organic pollutant and heavy metal by graphene oxide and reduced graphene materials Chem. Eng. J. 2015, 281 (1) 379 388 DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2015.06.102
  36. 36
    Hummers, W. S.; Offeman, R. E. Preparation of graphite oxide J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1958, 80, 1339 DOI: 10.1021/ja01539a017
  37. 37
    Pan, Z. H.; Liu, N.; Fu, L.; Liu, Z. F. Wrinkle engineering: A new approach to massive graphene nanoribbon arrays J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 17578 17581 DOI: 10.1021/ja207517u
  38. 38
    Acik, M.; Lee, G.; Mattevi, C.; Chhowalla, M.; Cho, K.; Chabal, Y. J. Unusual infrared-absorption mechanism in thermally reduced graphene oxide Nat. Mater. 2010, 9, 840 845 DOI: 10.1038/nmat2858
  39. 39
    Peng, L.; Xu, Z.; Liu, Z.; Wei, Y. Y.; Sun, H. Y.; Li, Z.; Zhao, X. L.; Gao, C. An iron-based green approach to 1-h production of single-layer graphene oxide Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 5716 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms6716
  40. 40
    Saleh, N. B.; Pfefferle, L. D.; Elimelech, M. Aggregation kinetics of multiwalled carbon nanotubes in aquatic systems: Measurements and environmental implications Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42 (21) 7963 7969 DOI: 10.1021/es801251c
  41. 41
    Bouchard, D.; Ma, X.; Isaacson, C. Colloidal properties of aqueous fullerenes: Isoelectric points and aggregation kinetics of C60 and C60 derivatives Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43 (17) 6597 6603 DOI: 10.1021/es901354r
  42. 42
    Overbeek, J. T. G. The Rule of Schulze and Hardy Pure Appl. Chem. 1980, 52, 1151 1161 DOI: 10.1351/pac198052051151
  43. 43
    Sano, M.; Okamura, J.; Shinkai, S. Colloidal nature of single-walled carbon nanotubes in electrolyte solution: The Schulze-Hardy Rule Langmuir 2001, 17, 7172 7173 DOI: 10.1021/la010698+
  44. 44
    Deng, X. J.; Lu, L. L.; Li, H. W.; Luo, F. The adsorption properties of Pb(II) and Cd(II) on functionalized graphene prepared by electrolysis method J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 183, 923 930 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.07.117
  45. 45
    Li, Y. H.; Ding, J.; Luan, Z. K.; Di, Z. C.; Zhu, Y. F.; Xu, C. L.; Wu, D. H.; Wei, B. Q. Competitive adsorption of Pb, Cu and Cd ions from aqueous solutions by multiwalled carbon nanotubes Carbon 2003, 41, 2787 2792 DOI: 10.1016/S0008-6223(03)00392-0
  46. 46
    Imamoglu, M.; Tekir, O. Removal of copper (II) and lead (II) ions from aqueous solutions by adsorption on activated carbon from a new precursor hazelnut husks Desalination 2008, 228, 108 113 DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2007.08.011
  47. 47
    Xu, Y.; Chen, B. Organic carbon and inorganic silicon speciation in rice-bran-derived biochars affect its capacity to adsorb cadmium in solution J. Soils Sediments 2015, 15, 60 70 DOI: 10.1007/s11368-014-0969-2
  48. 48
    Reddad, Z.; Gerente, C.; Andres, Y.; Le Cloirec, P. Adsorption of several metal ions onto a low-cost biosorbent: Kinetic and equilibrium studies Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002, 36, 2067 2073 DOI: 10.1021/es0102989
  49. 49
    Mimmo, T. J.; Marzadori, C.; Montecchio, D.; Gessa, C. Characterisation of Ca- and Al-pectate gels by thermal analysis and FT-IR spectroscopy Carbohydr. Res. 2005, 340, 2510 2519 DOI: 10.1016/j.carres.2005.08.011
  50. 50
    Ma, J. C.; Dougherty, D. A. The cation-π interaction Chem. Rev. 1997, 97, 1303 1324 DOI: 10.1021/cr9603744
  51. 51
    Tansel, B.; Sager, J.; Rector, T.; Garland, J.; Strayer, R. F.; Levine, L. F.; Roberts, M.; Hummerick, M.; Bauer, J. Significance of hydrated radius and hydration shells on ionic permeability during nanofiltration in dead end and cross flow modes Sep. Purif. Technol. 2006, 51, 40 47 DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2005.12.020
  52. 52
    Nightingale, E. R. Phenomenological theory of ion solvation. Effective radii of hydrated ions J. Phys. Chem. 1959, 63, 1381 1387 DOI: 10.1021/j150579a011
  53. 53
    Trivedi, P.; Axe, L.; Dyer, J. Adsorption of metal ions onto goethite: Single-adsorbate and competitive systems Colloids Surf., A 2001, 191, 107 121 DOI: 10.1016/S0927-7757(01)00768-3
  54. 54
    Sa, R. J.; Zhu, W. L.; Shen, J. H.; Gong, Z.; Cheng, J. G.; Chen, K. X.; Jiang, H. L. How does ammonium dynamically interact with benzene in aqueous media? A first principle study using the Car-Parrinello molecular dynamics Method J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 5094 5098 DOI: 10.1021/jp051692m
  55. 55
    Xu, Y. C.; Shen, J. H.; Zhu, W. L.; Luo, X. M.; Chen, K. X.; Jiang, H. L. Influence of the water molecule on cation-π Interaction: Ab initio second order Møller-Plesset Perturbation Theory (MP2) calculations J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 5945 5949 DOI: 10.1021/jp044568w
  56. 56
    Geim, A. K.; Novoselov, K. S. The rise of graphene Nat. Mater. 2007, 6, 183 191 DOI: 10.1038/nmat1849
  57. 57
    Quintana, M.; Grzelczak, M.; Spyrou, K.; Calvaresi, M.; Bals, S.; Kooi, B.; Van Tendeloo, G.; Rudolf, P.; Zerbetto, F.; Prato, M. A simple road for the transformation of few-layer graphene into MWNTs J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 13310 13315 DOI: 10.1021/ja303131j
  58. 58
    Patra, N.; Wang, B. Y.; Král, P. Nanodroplet activated and guided folding of graphene nanostructures Nano Lett. 2009, 9, 3766 3771 DOI: 10.1021/nl9019616
  59. 59
    Gong, Z.; Shen, H. Y.; Zhu, W. L.; Luo, X. M.; Chen, K. X.; Jiang, H. L. A computational study on electron transfer mechanism between alkaline earth metal atoms and cyclooctatetraene to form cation-π bonded complexes Chem. Phys. Lett. 2006, 423, 339 343 DOI: 10.1016/j.cplett.2006.03.096
  60. 60
    Zhu, W. L.; Luo, X. M.; Puah, C. M.; Tan, X. J.; Shen, J. H.; Gu, J. D.; Chen, K. X.; Jiang, H. L. The multiplicity, strength, and nature of the interaction of nucleobases with alkaline and alkaline earth metal cations: A density functional theory investigation J. Phys. Chem. A 2004, 108, 4008 4018 DOI: 10.1021/jp036911n
  61. 61
    Kumpf, R. A.; Dougherty, D. A. A mechanism for ion selectivity in potassium channels: Computational studies of cation-π interactions Science 1993, 261, 1708 1710 DOI: 10.1126/science.8378771
  62. 62
    Reddy, A. S.; Vijay, D.; Sastry, G. M.; Sastry, G. N. From subtle to substantial: Role of metal ions on π-π interactions J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 2479 2481 DOI: 10.1021/jp060018h
  63. 63
    Duan, M. Y.; Song, B.; Shi, G. S.; Li, H. K.; Ji, G. F.; Hu, J.; Chen, X. G.; Fang, H. P. Cation × 3π: Cooperative interaction of a cation and three benzenes with an anomalous order in binding energy J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 12104 12109 DOI: 10.1021/ja302918t

Cited By

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!
Citation Statements
Explore this article's citation statements on scite.ai

This article is cited by 295 publications.

  1. Marcin Z. Krasoń, Anna Paradowska, Sławomir Boncel, Mateusz Lejawa, Martyna Fronczek, Joanna Śliwka, Jerzy Nożyński, Piotr Bogus, Tomasz Hrapkowicz, Krzysztof Czamara, Agnieszka Kaczor, Marek W. Radomski. Graphene Oxide Significantly Modifies Cardiac Parameters and Coronary Endothelial Reactivity in Healthy and Hypertensive Rat Hearts Ex Vivo. ACS Omega 2024, 9 (26) , 28397-28411. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.4c02291
  2. Ning Tang, Yihui Guo, Ziqian Zhu, Longbo Jiang, Na Li, Tingting Hu, Lan Lu, Jingyi Zhang, Xiaodong Li, Jie Liang. New Insights into Aggregation Behaviors of the UV-Irradiated Dissolved Biochars (DBioCs) in Aqueous Environments: Effects of Water Chemistries and Variation in the Hamaker Constant. Environmental Science & Technology 2024, 58 (18) , 8053-8064. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c00780
  3. Yuyao Zhang, Tingjie Zhan, Xinfei Ge, Xiaoying Zhu, Baoliang Chen. Sluggish and Ion-Resilient Behavior of Interfacial Aqueous Layer on Single-Layer Graphene Oxide: Insights from In Situ Atomic Force Microscopy. Environmental Science & Technology 2024, 58 (15) , 6763-6771. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c09739
  4. Bo Peng, Peng Liao, Yi Jiang. A Meta-Analysis to Revisit the Property–Aggregation Relationships of Carbon Nanomaterials: Experimental Observations versus Predictions of the DLVO Theory. Langmuir 2024, 40 (13) , 7127-7138. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.4c00274
  5. Yuyao Zhang, Wentao Yu, Jian Wang, Tingjie Zhan, Muhammad Aqeel Kamran, Kun Wang, Xiangyu Zhu, Chiheng Chu, Xiaoying Zhu, Baoliang Chen. Long-Term Exposure of Graphene Oxide Suspension to Air Leading to Spontaneous Radical-Driven Degradation. Environmental Science & Technology 2023, 57 (38) , 14407-14416. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c05788
  6. Shoma Kondo, Tomoki Nishimura, Yuta Nishina, Koki Sano. Countercation Engineering of Graphene-Oxide Nanosheets for Imparting a Thermoresponsive Ability. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2023, 15 (31) , 37837-37844. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.3c07820
  7. Kandiyil Juraij, Saeed Punnoli Ammed, C Chingakham, Brindha Ramasubramanian, Seeram Ramakrishna, Suni Vasudevan, Athiyanathil Sujith. Electrospun Polyurethane Nanofiber Membranes for Microplastic and Nanoplastic Separation. ACS Applied Nano Materials 2023, 6 (6) , 4636-4650. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.3c00112
  8. Narges Darmiani, Fatemeh Hashemifar, Azam Iraji zad, Ali Esfandiar. Facile Fabrication of Highly Oriented Dense Ti3C2 Fibers with Enhanced Strength and Supercapacitance Performance by Coagulation Condition Tuning. ACS Applied Energy Materials 2023, 6 (4) , 2276-2285. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.2c03443
  9. Bei Liu, Zixin Han, Qi Han, Yufei Shu, Li Li, Beizhao Chen, Zhongying Wang, Joel A. Pedersen. Redispersion Behavior of 2D MoS2 Nanosheets: Unique Dependence on the Intervention Timing of Natural Organic Matter. Environmental Science & Technology 2023, 57 (2) , 939-950. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c05282
  10. Kolleboyina Jayaramulu, Soumya Mukherjee, Dulce M. Morales, Deepak P. Dubal, Ashok Kumar Nanjundan, Andreas Schneemann, Justus Masa, Stepan Kment, Wolfgang Schuhmann, Michal Otyepka, Radek Zbořil, Roland A. Fischer. Graphene-Based Metal–Organic Framework Hybrids for Applications in Catalysis, Environmental, and Energy Technologies. Chemical Reviews 2022, 122 (24) , 17241-17338. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00270
  11. Yijun Qian, Dan Liu, Guoliang Yang, Lifeng Wang, Yuchen Liu, Cheng Chen, Xungai Wang, Weiwei Lei. Boosting Osmotic Energy Conversion of Graphene Oxide Membranes via Self-Exfoliation Behavior in Nano-Confinement Spaces. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2022, 144 (30) , 13764-13772. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.2c04663
  12. Ying Zhu, Haojie Ding, Jiahui Fan, Shuan Liu, Yunqian Song, Huiping Deng, Chun Zhao, Dionysios D. Dionysiou. Nonradical Activation of Peroxydisulfate with In Situ Generated Amorphous MnO2 in an Electro-Permanganate Process: Involvement of Singlet Oxygen, Electron Transfer, and Mn(III)aq. ACS ES&T Engineering 2022, 2 (7) , 1316-1325. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestengg.1c00464
  13. Kun Lu, Yilin Zha, Shipeng Dong, Zhiyu Zhu, Zhuoyan Lv, Yufei Gu, Renquan Deng, Mingjie Wang, Shixiang Gao, Liang Mao. Uptake Route Altered the Bioavailability of Graphene in Misgurnus anguillicaudatus: Comparing Waterborne and Sediment Exposures. Environmental Science & Technology 2022, 56 (13) , 9435-9445. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c01805
  14. Anna Kuziel, Grzegorz Dzido, Rafał G. Jędrysiak, Anna Kolanowska, Bertrand Jóźwiak, Juliette Beunat, Emil Korczeniewski, Monika Zięba, Artur P. Terzyk, Noorhana Yahya, Vijay Kumar Thakur, Krzysztof K. Koziol, Sławomir Boncel. Biomimetically Inspired Highly Homogeneous Hydrophilization of Graphene with Poly(l-DOPA): Toward Electroconductive Coatings from Water-Processable Paints. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 2022, 10 (20) , 6596-6608. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.2c00226
  15. Bei Liu, Qi Han, Li Li, Sunxiang Zheng, Yufei Shu, Joel A. Pedersen, Zhongying Wang. Synergistic Effect of Metal Cations and Visible Light on 2D MoS2 Nanosheet Aggregation. Environmental Science & Technology 2021, 55 (24) , 16379-16389. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c03576
  16. Xiaofang Li, Meng An, Peide Li, Jianwen Miu, Qiang Wu, Fenghua Zheng, Juantao Jiang, Hongqiang Wang, Youguo Huang, Qingyu Li. Phenylamine-Functionalized Graphene–Copper Composites with High Thermal Conductivity: Implications for Thermal Dissipation. ACS Applied Nano Materials 2021, 4 (11) , 12170-12179. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.1c02680
  17. Sen Yang, Wen Jia, Yuangui Wang, Weifu Zhang, Xiaoya Yuan. Hydroxylated Graphene: A Promising Reinforcing Nanofiller for Nanoengineered Cement Composites. ACS Omega 2021, 6 (45) , 30465-30477. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.1c03844
  18. Huan Tang, Shuyan Zhang, Tinglin Huang, Jianfeng Zhang, Baoshan Xing. Mechanisms of the Aggregation of Graphene Oxide at High pH: Roles of Oxidation Debris and Metal Adsorption. Environmental Science & Technology 2021, 55 (21) , 14639-14648. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c04463
  19. Zhongying Wang, Qingsong Tu, Alison Sim, Julie Yu, Yanghua Duan, Sidney Poon, Bei Liu, Qi Han, Jeffrey J. Urban, David Sedlak, Baoxia Mi. Superselective Removal of Lead from Water by Two-Dimensional MoS2 Nanosheets and Layer-Stacked Membranes. Environmental Science & Technology 2020, 54 (19) , 12602-12611. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c02651
  20. Waldemir J. Paschoalino, Nicholas A. Payne, Tatiana M. Pessanha, Samantha M. Gateman, Lauro T. Kubota, Janine Mauzeroll. Charge Storage in Graphene Oxide: Impact of the Cation on Ion Permeability and Interfacial Capacitance. Analytical Chemistry 2020, 92 (15) , 10300-10307. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.0c00218
  21. Yuyao Zhang, Xiaoying Zhu, Baoliang Chen. Nanoscale Profiling of 2D Surface Hydrophobicity Recognition of Environmental Media via AFM Measurements In Situ. Environmental Science & Technology 2020, 54 (15) , 9315-9324. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c00211
  22. Yi Xie, Yang Gao, Xuemei Ren, Gang Song, Ahmed Alsaedi, Tasawar Hayat, Changlun Chen. Colloidal Behaviors of Two-Dimensional Titanium Carbide in Natural Surface Waters: The Role of Solution Chemistry. Environmental Science & Technology 2020, 54 (6) , 3353-3362. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b05372
  23. Yijia He, Lichao Qian, Ke Zhou, Ruirui Hu, Meirong Huang, Min Wang, Guoke Zhao, Yule Liu, Zhiping Xu, Hongwei Zhu. Graphene Oxide Promoted Cadmium Uptake by Rice in Soil. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 2019, 7 (12) , 10283-10292. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b06823
  24. Adeyemi S. Adeleye, Kay T. Ho, Min Zhang, Yao Li, Robert M. Burgess. Fate and Transformation of Graphene Oxide in Estuarine and Marine Waters. Environmental Science & Technology 2019, 53 (10) , 5858-5867. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b06485
  25. Linxia Zhang, Lixia Qin, Shi-Zhao Kang, Guo-Dong Li, Xiangqing Li. Graphene/Pyridylporphyrin Hybrids Interfacially Linked with Rare Earth Ions for Enhanced Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 2019, 7 (9) , 8358-8366. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b06867
  26. Tong Wu, Chong Liu, Biao Kong, Jie Sun, Yongji Gong, Kai Liu, Jin Xie, Allen Pei, Yi Cui. Amidoxime-Functionalized Macroporous Carbon Self-Refreshed Electrode Materials for Rapid and High-Capacity Removal of Heavy Metal from Water. ACS Central Science 2019, 5 (4) , 719-726. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscentsci.9b00130
  27. Tashfia M. Mohona, Anusha Gupta, Arvid Masud, Szu-Chia Chien, Li-Chiang Lin, Prathima C. Nalam, Nirupam Aich. Aggregation Behavior of Inorganic 2D Nanomaterials Beyond Graphene: Insights from Molecular Modeling and Modified DLVO Theory. Environmental Science & Technology 2019, 53 (8) , 4161-4172. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b05180
  28. Yang Gao, Ke Chen, Xuemei Ren, Ahmed Alsaedi, Tasawar Hayat, Changlun Chen. Exploring the Aggregation Mechanism of Graphene Oxide in the Presence of Radioactive Elements: Experimental and Theoretical Studies. Environmental Science & Technology 2018, 52 (21) , 12208-12215. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b02234
  29. Rishi Karan Singh Rathour, Jayanta Bhattacharya, Abhijit Mukherjee. Facile Synthesis of Graphene Oxide for Multicycle Adsorption of Aqueous Pb2+ in the Presence of Divalent Cations and Polyatomic Anions. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data 2018, 63 (9) , 3465-3474. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jced.8b00344
  30. Binbin Sun, Yinqing Zhang, Wei Chen, Kunkun Wang, Lingyan Zhu. Concentration Dependent Effects of Bovine Serum Albumin on Graphene Oxide Colloidal Stability in Aquatic Environment. Environmental Science & Technology 2018, 52 (13) , 7212-7219. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b06218
  31. David G. Goodwin, Jr., Adeyemi S. Adeleye, Lipiin Sung, Kay T. Ho, Robert M. Burgess, Elijah J. Petersen. Detection and Quantification of Graphene-Family Nanomaterials in the Environment. Environmental Science & Technology 2018, 52 (8) , 4491-4513. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b04938
  32. Huan Tang, Ying Zhao, Xiaonan Yang, Dongmei Liu, Penghui Shao, Zhigao Zhu, Sujie Shan, Fuyi Cui, and Baoshan Xing . New Insight into the Aggregation of Graphene Oxide Using Molecular Dynamics Simulations and Extended Derjaguin–Landau–Verwey–Overbeek Theory. Environmental Science & Technology 2017, 51 (17) , 9674-9682. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b01668
  33. Meilan Pan, Yanyang Zhang, Chao Shan, Xiaolin Zhang, Guandao Gao, and Bingcai Pan . Flat Graphene-Enhanced Electron Transfer Involved in Redox Reactions. Environmental Science & Technology 2017, 51 (15) , 8597-8605. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b01762
  34. Huan Tang, Ying Zhao, Xiaonan Yang, Dongmei Liu, Sujie Shan, and Fuyi Cui . Understanding the Roles of Solution Chemistries and Functionalization on the Aggregation of Graphene-Based Nanomaterials Using Molecular Dynamic Simulations. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2017, 121 (25) , 13888-13897. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b03193
  35. Qingqing Li, Baoliang Chen, and Baoshan Xing . Aggregation Kinetics and Self-Assembly Mechanisms of Graphene Quantum Dots in Aqueous Solutions: Cooperative Effects of pH and Electrolytes. Environmental Science & Technology 2017, 51 (3) , 1364-1376. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b04178
  36. Arash Sobouti, Bahram Rezai, Fatemeh Sadat Hoseinian. Enhanced manganese ion removal from aqueous solution using graphene oxide nanocollector in ion flotation: mechanism, efficiency, and recyclability. Scientific Reports 2025, 15 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-04883-8
  37. Shenyan Shang, Junfei Zhang, Luyao Duan, Lei Zhang. Molecular interactions in GO/C-S-H composites: Influence of calcium ions and functional groups. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids 2025, 662 , 123569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2025.123569
  38. Asma Ashfaq, Zafar Iqbal Khan, Kafeel Ahmad, Hamid Raza, Muhammad Nazim, Ajaz Ahmad. Multivariate analysis of potential health hazards of manganese via dietary exposure of widely consumed vegetables amended with municipal solid waste. Environmental Geochemistry and Health 2025, 47 (7) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-025-02559-w
  39. Yijing Y. Stehle, Timothy J. Barnum, Xiaoyu Hu, Qin Zou. Transition metal modification of graphene oxide membranes for enhanced aqueous stability and dielectric performance. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 2025, 716 , 136737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2025.136737
  40. Chun li Wang, Chen-yang Xu, Ren-tian Ma, Qi-rui Li, Fei-nan Hu, Shi-wei Zhao, Roland Bol. Comparison for colloidal stability and aggregation behavior of fulvic and humic acids: effects of cations and pH. Frontiers in Soil Science 2025, 5 https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoil.2025.1452870
  41. Quanyun Ye, Junfei Li, Dong Zeng, Ronghui He, Peiran Li, Jie Pan, Wencheng Wu, Dechun He. Photoaging enhanced heteroaggregation between nanoplastics and Al2O3 in aquatic environment: Experiments and DLVO theory calculation. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 2025, 715 , 136633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2025.136633
  42. Xiangyang Tian, Chaojun Zhuang, Ying Yan. Nitrogen-doped carbon nanotube membrane with hierarchical porous structure for catalytic degradation of phenol. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 2025, 13 (3) , 116910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2025.116910
  43. Fareeha Arshad, Israr U. Hassan, Jwaher M. AlGhamadi, Gowhar A. Naikoo. Biofouling-resistant nanomaterials for non-enzymatic glucose sensors: A critical review. Materials Today Bio 2025, 32 , 101746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtbio.2025.101746
  44. Juyun Lee, Sung Ho Cho, Jeong Min Jang, Seung Hee Woo, Yun Chan Kang, Seon Joon Kim. Achieving Full Redispersion of Dried MXene Monoliths via Trace Metal Cation Intercalation. Small Methods 2025, https://doi.org/10.1002/smtd.202500383
  45. Thi Tuong Van Tran, Mai Lien Tran, Chi Hieu Nguyen. Carboxylated graphene oxide: Characterization change and enhanced adsorption capacity towards Pb2+ and Cu2+ in wastewater. Journal of Molecular Liquids 2025, 426 , 127312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2025.127312
  46. Caili Dai, Wanlei Geng, Jiaming Li, Guang Zhao, Bin Yuan, Yang Zhao, Tayfun Babadagli. A Novel Thermo-Salinity-Responsive Nanographite System for Enhanced Oil Recovery in Deep Reservoirs. Engineering 2025, 426 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2025.04.009
  47. Sumit Kumar, Arkaprabha Giri, G. Shreeraj, Abhijit Patra, Ligy Philip. Functionalized triptycene-based porous polymer networks for pharmaceuticals removal: Unveiling role of ultrasound in adsorption. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 2025, 13 (2) , 115811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2025.115811
  48. Xiaomei Li, Linfeng Fu, Lin Cao, Lihui Lei, Xinxing Zhan, Changgang Hu, Xin Tong, Juan Tian. High electrocatalytic activity of crystallization-modulated ordered PtCu3/C nanoalloy catalysts for oxygen reduction reaction. Chemical Engineering Journal 2025, 507 , 160445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2025.160445
  49. Kangying Wu, Qixing Zhou, Jing Xu, Hui Zeng, Xiangang Hu, Shaohu Ouyang. The joint environmental fates and ecotoxicity of graphene-family nanomaterials and co-existing contaminants in the aquatic environment: A review. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology 2025, 55 (4) , 215-240. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2024.2398837
  50. Jianlong Wang. Adsorption of nuclides (Cs, Sr, Co, U, and Tc) by various adsorbents. 2025, 139-268. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-26706-2.00003-6
  51. Rongting Guan, Weizhi Lin, Guorui Zhang, Zhaoyang Ni, Yusong Ma, Feng Chen, Qiang Fu. Popcorn‐Inspired Expanded Graphite Microspheres with Controlled Morphology and Considerable Conductivity. Small Methods 2024, 8 (12) https://doi.org/10.1002/smtd.202400441
  52. Damian C. Onwudiwe, Naledi H. Seheri, Nnenesi A. Kgabi, Dipti R. Sahu. Functionalized graphitic carbon nitride as adsorbent for the removal of arsenic and lead from groundwater. Discover Water 2024, 4 (1) https://doi.org/10.1007/s43832-024-00095-9
  53. Xinyang Li, Jiawen Zhou, Pengjie Hu, Tong Zhou, Zhu Li, Yongming Luo, Longhua Wu, Michael Schindler. Colloids control the mobilization of released zinc- and cadmium- species in calcite-rich soils. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 2024, 387 , 12-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2024.11.003
  54. Loan Thi Kim Duong, Thuy Thi Thanh Nguyen, Thuan Van Tran. Combined pollution of tetracyclines and microplastics in the aquatic environment: Insights into the occurrence, interaction mechanisms and effects. Environmental Research 2024, 263 , 120223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2024.120223
  55. Chironjit Kumar Shaha, Sudipta Saha, Subarna Karmaker, Tapan Kumar Saha. Efficient removal of moxifloxacin from aqueous solutions using sulfonated graphene oxide: Adsorption mechanisms, thermodynamics, and reusability. Journal of Water Process Engineering 2024, 67 , 106187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2024.106187
  56. Sara Salatin, Ali Asghar Hamidi, Ali Abolhassani, Samin Hamidi. Graphene oxide@chitosan for urinary sarcosine extraction in prostate cancer detection: Method development and adsorption isotherm studies. Analytical Chemistry Letters 2024, 14 (6) , 803-816. https://doi.org/10.1080/22297928.2024.2431530
  57. Chironjit Kumar Shaha, Subarna Karmaker, Tapan Kumar Saha. Efficient adsorptive removal of levofloxacin using sulfonated graphene oxide: Adsorption behavior, kinetics, and thermodynamics. Heliyon 2024, 10 (22) , e40319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40319
  58. Tuan Anh Nguyen, Doan Thi Yen Oanh, Manh Ha Nguyen, The Huu Nguyen, Thi Thu Phuong Nguyen, Thi Hong Nhung Le, Minh Viet Nguyen, Thi Mai Huong Pham, Quang Tung Nguyen. Research to develop the ability to remove As(III) ions in water of an environmentally friendly hybrid material based on bacterial cellulose and graphene oxide. Vietnam Journal of Chemistry 2024, 62 (5) , 600-614. https://doi.org/10.1002/vjch.202300419
  59. Zhe Ding, Bihong He, Wei Wang, Longmiao Yuan, Wentao Zhang, Yuqiang Li, Jianjun Liang. Different Cr(VI)-sequestration behaviors between carbon nanoparticles and their agglomerates. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry 2024, 455 , 115802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochem.2024.115802
  60. Melike B. Altay Geren, George Q. Chen, Dan Li, Sandra E. Kentish. Equilibrium ion sorption in graphene oxide membranes. Journal of Membrane Science 2024, 710 , 123155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2024.123155
  61. Chenxi Li, Zhuoqi Cao, Haiting Kang, Shuo Wang, Jiazhen Sun. Fabrication of ultra-precise flexible electrothermal film by direct-write printing porous graphene-Ag structure. Progress in Organic Coatings 2024, 195 , 108650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2024.108650
  62. Umar Latif, Mohsin Ali Raza, Zaeem Ur Rehman, Muhammad Faheem Maqsood, Syed Muhammad Zain Mehdi, Sharafat Ali, Muhammad Farooq Khan, Sunil Kumar. Role of sulfur and phosphorous doping on the electrochemical performance of graphene oxide-based electrodes. Electrochimica Acta 2024, 497 , 144581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2024.144581
  63. Yuanzhang Hou, Yange Wang, Ling Zhu, Zhenbo Zhang, Zhiqiang Dong, Yuping Qiu. Different inhibitory mechanisms of flexible and rigid clay minerals on the transport of microplastics in marine porous media. Environmental Pollution 2024, 356 , 124246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2024.124246
  64. Min Zhang, Manhong Miao, Shasha Zhao, Bingqing Yu, Xuhua Cheng, Yao Li. Photo-transformation of graphene oxide in synthetic and natural waters. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2024, 476 , 135040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.135040
  65. Tianli Bao, Peifang Wang, Bin Hu, Qiutong Jin, Tianming Zheng, Dingxin Li. Adsorption and distribution of heavy metals in aquatic environments: The role of colloids and effects of environmental factors. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2024, 474 , 134725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.134725
  66. Kangying Wu, Shaohu Ouyang, Zongxin Tao, Xiangang Hu, Qixing Zhou. Algal extracellular polymeric substance compositions drive the binding characteristics, affinity, and phytotoxicity of graphene oxide in water. Water Research 2024, 260 , 121908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2024.121908
  67. Guansheng Liu, Weiyong Zhan, Yongming Wu, Hua Zhong. Transport of carbon nanoparticles in porous media and its effect on the transport of concurrent contaminants. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology 2024, 54 (13) , 977-1000. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2023.2285694
  68. Iris Malnarič, Matjaž Krajnc, Urška Šebenik. Rheological study of hybrid aqueous suspension of TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibrils and graphene oxide. Cellulose 2024, 31 (10) , 6105-6122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-024-05978-7
  69. Ying Chen, Huan Tang, Hangzhe Li, Yue Yin, Wenhu Song, Honghong Guo, Tinglin Huang, Baoshan Xing. Molecular-level insight into the behavior of metal cations and organic matter during the aggregation of polystyrene nanoplastics. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2024, 473 , 134665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.134665
  70. Chironjit Kumar Shaha, Md Abdullah Al Mahmud, Sudipta Saha, Subarna Karmaker, Tapan Kumar Saha. Efficient removal of sparfloxacin antibiotic from water using sulfonated graphene oxide: Kinetics, thermodynamics, and environmental implications. Heliyon 2024, 10 (13) , e33644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33644
  71. Shuangrui Yang, Yu Cao, Zhiheng Li, Chengxue Ma, Yuheng Huang, Die Hu, Hongxia Liu, Xiaoliu Huangfu. Cotransport of aged biochar colloids and thallium(I) in water-saturated porous media: Impact of the ionic strength, pH and aging degree. Science of The Total Environment 2024, 927 , 172294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.172294
  72. Zejun Zhang, Luping Zheng, Weixin Huang, Qunfeng Cheng. Improving strength and toughness of graphene film through metal ion bridging. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2024, 121 (22) https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2322663121
  73. Weiyong Zhan, Xude Zhao, Hua Zhong, Guansheng Liu. Cotransport of fullerene nanoparticles and montmorillonite colloids in porous media: Critical role of divalent cations of montmorillonite. Science of The Total Environment 2024, 912 , 169470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.169470
  74. Djalma Lucas de Sousa Maia, Francine Côa, Kelly Barbosa da Silva, Carlos Henrique Zanini Martins, Lidiane Silva Franqui, Leandro Carneiro Fonseca, Douglas Soares da Silva, Fabrício de Souza Delite, Diego Stéfani Teodoro Martinez, Oswaldo Luiz Alves. Drying of graphene oxide: effects on red blood cells and protein corona formation. Journal of Materials Science 2024, 59 (2) , 577-592. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-023-09163-2
  75. Sung-Sil Park, Yuri Park, Eveliina Repo, Hyun-Sang Shin, Yuhoon Hwang. Three-dimensionally printed scaffold coated with graphene oxide for enhanced heavy metal adsorption: Batch and fixed-bed column studies. Journal of Water Process Engineering 2024, 57 , 104658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2023.104658
  76. Zhouli Liu, Qingxuan Lu, Yi Zhao, Jianbing Wei, Miao Liu, Xiangbo Duan, Maosen Lin. Ameliorating Effects of Graphene Oxide on Cadmium Accumulation and Eco-Physiological Characteristics in a Greening Hyperaccumulator (Lonicera japonica Thunb.). Plants 2024, 13 (1) , 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13010019
  77. Yang Gao, Li Chen, Peihuan Wen, Letao Zhou, Shaohu Ouyang, Wenjing Xue, Wei Zhang, Lean Zhou, Jinting Wang, Shiquan Sun. Light mediated the interface interaction of commercial graphene oxide in natural surface water: photo-transformation, microbial diversity and metabolism. Environmental Science: Nano 2023, 10 (12) , 3343-3356. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3EN00591G
  78. Weiqian Liang, Yingyue Zhou, Shuyin Wei, Longxia Lan, Jinfeng Chen, Jiawei Zhao, Hao Wang, Rui Gao, Feng Zeng. Exploring the relation between aggregation and adsorption of microplastics in aquatic environment containing metal cations. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 2023, 11 (6) , 111562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2023.111562
  79. Hao He, He Xiao, Chenrui Liu, Yuyao Li, Dejian Li, Mengke Li, Yun Liu. Efficient degradation of tetracycline with N-rGO/CuO catalysts under high salinity condition via persulfate activation dominated by non-radical pathways. Separation and Purification Technology 2023, 327 , 124936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2023.124936
  80. Najmeh Rezazadeh, Shahnaz Danesh, Mohammad Eftekhari. Investigation the adsorption mechanism of a non-ionic surfactant on graphene oxide and its derivatives (kinetic, isotherm curves, thermodynamic, and effect of salts studies). Environmental Nanotechnology, Monitoring & Management 2023, 20 , 100819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enmm.2023.100819
  81. Mengjia Zhang, Wei Wei, Yang Chen, Xuan Han. Effects of Cr(VI) oxyanion, humic acid and solution chemistry on the aggregation and colloidal stability of green synthesized chlorapatite nanoparticles. Chemosphere 2023, 342 , 140147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.140147
  82. Huai-Yuan Niu, Jin-Cheng Li, Ji-Shan Li, Cong Yi, Cheng-Gang Niu. Preparation, properties and applications of porous hydrogels containing thiol groups for heavy metal removal. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 2023, 11 (5) , 110983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2023.110983
  83. Wei Zou, Sai Ma, Haiwen Ma, Guoqing Zhang, Zhiguo Cao, Xingli Zhang. Componential and molecular-weight-dependent effects of natural organic matter on the colloidal behavior, transformation, and toxicity of MoS2 nanoflakes. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2023, 459 , 132186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.132186
  84. Zhiqiang Dong, Zheng Chen, Junnan Rui, Weiying Li, Yuping Qiu. Size effect of graphene oxide from quantum dot to nanoflake on the mobility of nanoplastics in seawater-saturated sand. Water Research 2023, 244 , 120491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2023.120491
  85. Marcin Z. Krasoń, Anna Paradowska, Martyna Fronczek, Mateusz Lejawa, Natalia Kamieńska, Michał Krejca, Anna Kolanowska, Sławomir Boncel, Marek W. Radomski. Stabilization of Graphene Oxide Dispersion in Plasma-like Isotonic Solution Containing Aggregating Concentrations of Bivalent Cations. Pharmaceutics 2023, 15 (10) , 2495. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15102495
  86. Qiaoping Kong, Hongzheng Zhang, Yunlong Lan, Xueqing Shi, Zilong Fang, Qi Chang, Jun Liu, Chaohai Wei. Functional graphene oxide for organic pollutants removal from wastewater: a mini review. Environmental Technology 2023, 44 (21) , 3183-3195. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2022.2053754
  87. Francine Côa, Leandro de Sá Bortolozzo, Daiana Silva Ávila, Antonio G. Souza Filho, Diego Stéfani Teodoro Martinez. Toxicology of carbon nanomaterials in the Caenorhabditis elegans model: current status, characterization, and perspectives for testing harmonization. Frontiers in Carbon 2023, 2 https://doi.org/10.3389/frcrb.2023.1241637
  88. Tao Hu, Weichuan Xu, Dong Li, Song Wang, Yuxiang Wang, Caijin Wu, Liqiang Tan. Aggregation and disaggregation of Al2O3 nanoparticles: influence of solution pH, humic acid, and electrolyte cations. Colloid and Polymer Science 2023, 301 (8) , 989-999. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00396-023-05124-y
  89. P. N. Omo-Okoro, O. I. Adeiga, T. Velempini, E. Prabakaran, C. J. Curtis, K. Pillay. Nickel ion removal from aqueous media using polyaniline–macadamia nutshells and its reuse for photodegradation of orange dye. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology 2023, 20 (8) , 8655-8672. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-022-04527-8
  90. Xiangyang Tian, Huiping Zhang, Chengzhi Hu, Ying Yan. Efficient and continuous removal of phenol by activating PMS via nitrogen doped carbon nanotube membrane in the structured fixed bed. Journal of Water Process Engineering 2023, 54 , 104029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2023.104029
  91. Yuanyuan Yu, Qin Zeng, Haoquan Zhang, Maoqin Ao, Jingmei Yao, Chun Yang, Svetlozar Velizarov, Le Han. Graphene Oxide/Polyethyleneimine-Modified Cation Exchange Membrane for Efficient Selective Recovery of Ammonia Nitrogen from Wastewater. Membranes 2023, 13 (8) , 726. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes13080726
  92. Joshua M. Little, Jiayue Sun, Ali Kamali, Amy Chen, Asher C. Leff, Yang Li, Leah K. Borden, Thilini U. Dissanayake, Deborah Essumang, Benita O. Oseleononmen, Dongxia Liu, Taylor J. Woehl, Po‐Yen Chen. Noble Metal Ion‐Directed Assembly of 2D Materials for Heterostructured Catalysts and Metallic Micro‐Texturing. Advanced Functional Materials 2023, 33 (30) https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202215222
  93. Mostafa Khosroupour Arabi, Morteza Ghorbanzadeh Ahangari. Heavy Metals Adsorption by Nanosheet: Mechanism and Effective Parameters. 2023https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.1001599
  94. Jie Pang, Jiao Li, Jianhui Guo, Mingjie Jia, Jingwei Zhang. Tuning the aggregation structure and surface composition of reduced graphene oxide microspheres for high-rate supercapacitors. Diamond and Related Materials 2023, 136 , 109920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diamond.2023.109920
  95. Shaohu Ouyang, Qixing Zhou, Zhicheng Bi, Jing Sun, Xiangang Hu. Effect of natural soil nanocolloids on the fate and toxicity of cadmium to rice (Oryza sativa L.) roots. Science of The Total Environment 2023, 879 , 162887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162887
  96. Diana Matos, Salomé F. P. Almeida, Paula A. A. P. Marques, Sofia Pinto, Etelvina Figueira. Effects of Graphene Oxide Nanosheets in Freshwater Biofilms. Molecules 2023, 28 (12) , 4577. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28124577
  97. Botagoz Zhuman, Hadil Abu Khalifeh, Ioannis Zuburtikudis, Mahendra Kumar, Hassan A. Arafat, Enas Nashef. Ionic liquid functionalized graphene oxide for the adsorption of Ca2+ and Mg2+ ions from saline aqueous feed. Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering 2023, 40 (5) , 1176-1185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-022-1365-z
  98. James M. Exley, Timothy N. Hunter, Thomas Pugh, Martin R. Tillotson. Influence of flake size and electrolyte conditions on graphene oxide adsorption of ionic dyes. Powder Technology 2023, 421 , 118387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2023.118387
  99. Jing Zhao, Lin Wang, Gang Chu. Comparison of the Sorption of Cu(II) and Pb(II) by Bleached and Activated Biochars: Insight into Complexation and Cation–π Interaction. Agronomy 2023, 13 (5) , 1282. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13051282
  100. Shuanglei Xie, Chuanqi Pan, Yuan Yao, Xianglin Yu, Ze Xu, Weidong Yuan, Yi Zhang, Ning Guo, Xue Li, Xuefei Mao, Shengqiang Xiao, Junbo Li, Yanbing Guo. Ultra-high-efficiency capture of lead ions over acetylenic bond-rich graphdiyne adsorbent in aqueous solution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2023, 120 (16) https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2221002120
Load more citations

Environmental Science & Technology

Cite this: Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016, 50, 20, 11066–11075
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b04235
Published September 23, 2016

Copyright © 2016 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under these Terms of Use.

Article Views

8389

Altmetric

-

Citations

Learn about these metrics

Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.

  • Abstract

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. AFM (A), TEM (B), and FTIR (C) characterization of GO.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. Electrophoretic mobility (EPM) and hydrodynamic diameter of GO as a function of the cation concentration of H+ (A1, A2), monovalent metal cations (B1, B2), divalent metal cations (C1, C2), and trivalent metal cations (D1, D2).

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. Bulk flocculation of GO in aqueous solution containing monovalent cations (A), divalent cations (B), and trivalent cations (C) with different concentrations to determine their destabilization capability.

    Figure 4

    Figure 4. Effects of cation type and cation concentration on GO aggregation. Typical aggregation kinetics of GO at different K+ concentrations (A). Attachment efficiency (α) of GO as a function of monovalent cation concentration (B), divalent cation concentration (C), and trivalent cation concentration (D).

    Figure 5

    Figure 5. Isotherms of Pb2+, Cu2+, and Cd2+ onto GO during the aggregation process (A) and relationship between EPM and the adsorption of GO (B).

    Figure 6

    Figure 6. TEM and AFM images of the GO flocculate during aggregation with the presence of Cd2+. TEM images of aggregated GO (A), magnified version (B), with small size curled GO in the dispersed situation (C), with a typical 1D tube-like structure (D), with a 2D multiple folded structure (E), and a 3D tightly aggregated structure (F). AFM images of flocculated GO (G, H). G1 and H1 show the testing line height in parts G and H, respectively.

    Figure 7

    Figure 7. Proposed interactions of heavy metal cations with GO nanosheets in three steps: (I) adsorption of heavy metal onto GO nanosheets; (II) formation of 1D-, 2D-, and 3D-like structures; and (III) aggregation of sphere-like flocculation.

  • References


    This article references 63 other publications.

    1. 1
      Dreyer, D. R.; Park, S. J.; Bielawski, C. W.; Ruoff, R. S. The chemistry of graphene oxide Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39, 228 240 DOI: 10.1039/B917103G
    2. 2
      Zhang, Y. B.; Tan, Y. W.; Stormer, H. L.; Kim, P. Experimental observation of the quantum Hall effect and Berry’s phase in graphene Nature 2005, 438, 201 204 DOI: 10.1038/nature04235
    3. 3
      Novoselov, K. S.; Geim, A. K.; Morozov, S. V.; Jiang, D.; Zhang, Y.; Dubonos, S. V.; Grigorieva, I. V.; Firsov, A. A. Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films Science 2004, 306, 666 669 DOI: 10.1126/science.1102896
    4. 4
      Nair, R. R.; Blake, P.; Grigorenko, A. N.; Novoselov, K. S.; Booth, T. J.; Stauber, T.; Peres, N. M. R.; Geim, A. K. Fine structure constant defines visual transparency of graphene Science 2008, 320, 1308 DOI: 10.1126/science.1156965
    5. 5
      Lee, C.; Wei, X. D.; Kysar, J. W.; Hone, J. Measurement of the elastic properties and intrinsic strength of monolayer graphene Science 2008, 321, 385 388 DOI: 10.1126/science.1157996
    6. 6
      Loh, K. P.; Bao, Q. L.; Ang, P. K.; Yang, J. X. The chemistry of graphene J. Mater. Chem. 2010, 20, 2277 2289 DOI: 10.1039/b920539j
    7. 7
      Chen, D.; Feng, H. B.; Li, J. H. Graphene oxide: Preparation, functionalization, and electrochemical applications Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 6027 6053 DOI: 10.1021/cr300115g
    8. 8
      Chua, C. K.; Pumera, M. Chemical reduction of graphene oxide: A synthetic chemistry viewpoint Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 291 312 DOI: 10.1039/C3CS60303B
    9. 9
      Zhu, J. X.; Zhu, T.; Zhou, X. Z.; Zhang, Y. Y.; Lou, X. W.; Chen, X. D.; Zhang, H.; Hng, H. H.; Yan, Q. Y. Facile synthesis of metal oxide/reduced graphene oxide hybrids with high lithium storage capacity and stable cyclability Nanoscale 2011, 3, 1084 1089 DOI: 10.1039/C0NR00744G
    10. 10
      Stoller, M. D.; Park, S. J.; Zhu, Y. W.; An, j.; Ruoff, R. S. Graphene-based ultracapacitors Nano Lett. 2008, 8, 3498 3502 DOI: 10.1021/nl802558y
    11. 11
      Lightcap, I. V.; Kosel, T. H.; Kamat, P. V. Anchoring semiconductor and metal nanoparticles on a two-dimensional catalyst mat. storing and shuttling electrons with reduced graphene oxide Nano Lett. 2010, 10, 577 583 DOI: 10.1021/nl9035109
    12. 12
      Scheuermann, G. M.; Rumi, L. G.; Steurer, P.; Bannwarth, W.; Mülhaupt, R. Palladium Nanoparticles on graphite oxide and its functionalized graphene derivatives as highly active catalysts for the Suzuki-Miyaura coupling reaction J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 8262 8270 DOI: 10.1021/ja901105a
    13. 13
      Song, H. J.; Zhang, L. C.; He, C. L.; Qu, Y.; Tian, Y. F.; Lv, Y. Graphene sheets decorated with SnO2 nanoparticles: In situ synthesis and highly efficient materials for cataluminescence gas sensors J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 5972 5977 DOI: 10.1039/c0jm04331a
    14. 14
      Chitara, B.; Panchakarla, L. S.; Krupanidhi, S. B.; Rao, C. N. R. Infrared photodetectors based on reduced graphene oxide and graphene nanoribbons Adv. Mater. 2011, 23, 5419 5424 DOI: 10.1002/adma.201101414
    15. 15
      Zhao, G. X.; Li, J. X.; Ren, X. M.; Chen, C. L.; Wang, X. K. Few-Layered Graphene Oxide nanosheets as superior sorbents for heavy metal ion pollution management Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45, 10454 10462 DOI: 10.1021/es203439v
    16. 16
      Zhao, G. X.; Jiang, L.; He, Y. D.; Li, J. X.; Dong, H. L.; Wang, X. K.; Hu, W. P. Sulfonated grapheme for persistent aromatic pollutant management Adv. Mater. 2011, 23, 3959 3963 DOI: 10.1002/adma.201101007
    17. 17
      Yang, K.; Chen, B.; Zhu, L. Graphene-coated materials using silica particles as a framework for highly efficient removal of aromatic pollutants in water Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 11641 DOI: 10.1038/srep11641
    18. 18
      Yang, K.; Wang, J.; Chen, B. Facile fabrication of stable monolayer and few layer graphene nanosheets as superior sorbents for persistent aromatic pollutant management in water J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 18219 18224 DOI: 10.1039/C4TA04300F
    19. 19
      Shen, Y.; Fang, Q.; Chen, B. Environmental applications of three-dimensional graphene-based macrostructures: Adsorption, transformation and detection Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49, 67 84 DOI: 10.1021/es504421y
    20. 20
      Shen, Y.; Chen, B. Sulfonated graphene nanosheets as a superb adsorbent for various environmental pollutants in water Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49, 7364 7372 DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b01057
    21. 21
      Ji, L.; Chen, W.; Xu, Z.; Zheng, S.; Zhu, D. Graphene nanosheets and graphite oxide as promising adsorbents for removal of organic contaminants from aqueous solution Journal of Environment Quality 2013, 42, 191 198 DOI: 10.2134/jeq2012.0172
    22. 22
      Wang, J.; Chen, Z.; Chen, B. Adsorption of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by graphene and graphene oxide nanosheets Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48, 4817 4825 DOI: 10.1021/es405227u
    23. 23
      Chen, X.; Chen, B. Macroscopic and spectroscopic investigations on adsorption of nitroaromatic compounds to graphene oxide, and reduced graphene oxide and graphene nanosheets Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49, 6181 6189 DOI: 10.1021/es5054946
    24. 24
      Bianco, A. Graphene: safe or toxic? The two faces of the medal Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 4986 4997 DOI: 10.1002/anie.201209099
    25. 25
      Akhavan, O.; Ghaderi, E.; Emamy, H.; Akhavan, F. Genotoxicity of graphene nanoribbons in human mesenchymal stem cells Carbon 2013, 54, 419 431 DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2012.11.058
    26. 26
      Akhavan, O.; Ghaderi, E. Toxicity of graphene and graphene oxide nanowalls against bacteria ACS Nano 2010, 4, 5731 5736 DOI: 10.1021/nn101390x
    27. 27
      Akhavan, O.; Ghaderi, E.; Akhavan, A. Size-dependent genotoxicity of graphene nanoplatelets in human stem cells Biomaterials 2012, 33, 8017 8025 DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.07.040
    28. 28
      Li, D.; Müller, M. B.; Gilje, S. L.; Kaner, R. B.; Wallace, G. G. Processable aqueous dispersions of graphene nanosheets Nat. Nanotechnol. 2008, 3, 101 105 DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2007.451
    29. 29
      Chowdhury, I.; Duch, M. C.; Mansukhani, N. D.; Hersam, M. C.; Bouchard, D. Colloidal properties and stability of graphene oxide nanomaterials in the aquatic environment Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47, 6288 6296 DOI: 10.1021/es400483k
    30. 30
      Wu, L.; Liu, L.; Gao, B.; Muňoz-Carpena, R.; Zhang, M.; Chen, H.; Zhou, Z. H.; Wang, H. Aggregation kinetics of graphene oxides in aqueous solutions: Experiments, mechanisms, and modeling Langmuir 2013, 29, 15174 15181 DOI: 10.1021/la404134x
    31. 31
      Chowdhury, I.; Mansukhani, N. D.; Guiney, L. M.; Hersam, M. C.; Bouchard, D. Aggregation and stability of reduced graphene oxide: Complex roles of divalent cations, pH, and natural organic matter Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49, 10886 10893 DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b01866
    32. 32
      Hong, B. J.; Compton, O. C.; An, Z.; Eryazici, I.; Nguyen, S. T. Successful stabilization of graphene oxide in electrolyte solutions: Enhancement of biofunctionalization and cellular uptake ACS Nano 2012, 6, 63 73 DOI: 10.1021/nn202355p
    33. 33
      Ren, X. M.; Li, J. X.; Tan, X. L.; Shi, W. Q.; Chen, C. L.; Shao, D. D.; Wen, T.; Wang, L. F.; Zhao, G. X.; Sheng, G. P.; Wang, X. K. Impact of Al2O3 on the aggregation and deposition of grapheme oxide Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48, 5493 5500 DOI: 10.1021/es404996b
    34. 34
      Yang, S. T.; Chang, Y. L.; Wang, H. F.; Liu, G. B.; Chen, S.; Wang, Y. W.; Liu, Y. F.; Cao, A. Folding/aggregation of graphene oxide and its application in Cu2+ removal J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2010, 351, 122 127 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2010.07.042
    35. 35
      Wang, J.; Chen, B. Adsorption and coadsorption of organic pollutant and heavy metal by graphene oxide and reduced graphene materials Chem. Eng. J. 2015, 281 (1) 379 388 DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2015.06.102
    36. 36
      Hummers, W. S.; Offeman, R. E. Preparation of graphite oxide J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1958, 80, 1339 DOI: 10.1021/ja01539a017
    37. 37
      Pan, Z. H.; Liu, N.; Fu, L.; Liu, Z. F. Wrinkle engineering: A new approach to massive graphene nanoribbon arrays J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 17578 17581 DOI: 10.1021/ja207517u
    38. 38
      Acik, M.; Lee, G.; Mattevi, C.; Chhowalla, M.; Cho, K.; Chabal, Y. J. Unusual infrared-absorption mechanism in thermally reduced graphene oxide Nat. Mater. 2010, 9, 840 845 DOI: 10.1038/nmat2858
    39. 39
      Peng, L.; Xu, Z.; Liu, Z.; Wei, Y. Y.; Sun, H. Y.; Li, Z.; Zhao, X. L.; Gao, C. An iron-based green approach to 1-h production of single-layer graphene oxide Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 5716 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms6716
    40. 40
      Saleh, N. B.; Pfefferle, L. D.; Elimelech, M. Aggregation kinetics of multiwalled carbon nanotubes in aquatic systems: Measurements and environmental implications Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42 (21) 7963 7969 DOI: 10.1021/es801251c
    41. 41
      Bouchard, D.; Ma, X.; Isaacson, C. Colloidal properties of aqueous fullerenes: Isoelectric points and aggregation kinetics of C60 and C60 derivatives Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43 (17) 6597 6603 DOI: 10.1021/es901354r
    42. 42
      Overbeek, J. T. G. The Rule of Schulze and Hardy Pure Appl. Chem. 1980, 52, 1151 1161 DOI: 10.1351/pac198052051151
    43. 43
      Sano, M.; Okamura, J.; Shinkai, S. Colloidal nature of single-walled carbon nanotubes in electrolyte solution: The Schulze-Hardy Rule Langmuir 2001, 17, 7172 7173 DOI: 10.1021/la010698+
    44. 44
      Deng, X. J.; Lu, L. L.; Li, H. W.; Luo, F. The adsorption properties of Pb(II) and Cd(II) on functionalized graphene prepared by electrolysis method J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 183, 923 930 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.07.117
    45. 45
      Li, Y. H.; Ding, J.; Luan, Z. K.; Di, Z. C.; Zhu, Y. F.; Xu, C. L.; Wu, D. H.; Wei, B. Q. Competitive adsorption of Pb, Cu and Cd ions from aqueous solutions by multiwalled carbon nanotubes Carbon 2003, 41, 2787 2792 DOI: 10.1016/S0008-6223(03)00392-0
    46. 46
      Imamoglu, M.; Tekir, O. Removal of copper (II) and lead (II) ions from aqueous solutions by adsorption on activated carbon from a new precursor hazelnut husks Desalination 2008, 228, 108 113 DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2007.08.011
    47. 47
      Xu, Y.; Chen, B. Organic carbon and inorganic silicon speciation in rice-bran-derived biochars affect its capacity to adsorb cadmium in solution J. Soils Sediments 2015, 15, 60 70 DOI: 10.1007/s11368-014-0969-2
    48. 48
      Reddad, Z.; Gerente, C.; Andres, Y.; Le Cloirec, P. Adsorption of several metal ions onto a low-cost biosorbent: Kinetic and equilibrium studies Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002, 36, 2067 2073 DOI: 10.1021/es0102989
    49. 49
      Mimmo, T. J.; Marzadori, C.; Montecchio, D.; Gessa, C. Characterisation of Ca- and Al-pectate gels by thermal analysis and FT-IR spectroscopy Carbohydr. Res. 2005, 340, 2510 2519 DOI: 10.1016/j.carres.2005.08.011
    50. 50
      Ma, J. C.; Dougherty, D. A. The cation-π interaction Chem. Rev. 1997, 97, 1303 1324 DOI: 10.1021/cr9603744
    51. 51
      Tansel, B.; Sager, J.; Rector, T.; Garland, J.; Strayer, R. F.; Levine, L. F.; Roberts, M.; Hummerick, M.; Bauer, J. Significance of hydrated radius and hydration shells on ionic permeability during nanofiltration in dead end and cross flow modes Sep. Purif. Technol. 2006, 51, 40 47 DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2005.12.020
    52. 52
      Nightingale, E. R. Phenomenological theory of ion solvation. Effective radii of hydrated ions J. Phys. Chem. 1959, 63, 1381 1387 DOI: 10.1021/j150579a011
    53. 53
      Trivedi, P.; Axe, L.; Dyer, J. Adsorption of metal ions onto goethite: Single-adsorbate and competitive systems Colloids Surf., A 2001, 191, 107 121 DOI: 10.1016/S0927-7757(01)00768-3
    54. 54
      Sa, R. J.; Zhu, W. L.; Shen, J. H.; Gong, Z.; Cheng, J. G.; Chen, K. X.; Jiang, H. L. How does ammonium dynamically interact with benzene in aqueous media? A first principle study using the Car-Parrinello molecular dynamics Method J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 5094 5098 DOI: 10.1021/jp051692m
    55. 55
      Xu, Y. C.; Shen, J. H.; Zhu, W. L.; Luo, X. M.; Chen, K. X.; Jiang, H. L. Influence of the water molecule on cation-π Interaction: Ab initio second order Møller-Plesset Perturbation Theory (MP2) calculations J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 5945 5949 DOI: 10.1021/jp044568w
    56. 56
      Geim, A. K.; Novoselov, K. S. The rise of graphene Nat. Mater. 2007, 6, 183 191 DOI: 10.1038/nmat1849
    57. 57
      Quintana, M.; Grzelczak, M.; Spyrou, K.; Calvaresi, M.; Bals, S.; Kooi, B.; Van Tendeloo, G.; Rudolf, P.; Zerbetto, F.; Prato, M. A simple road for the transformation of few-layer graphene into MWNTs J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 13310 13315 DOI: 10.1021/ja303131j
    58. 58
      Patra, N.; Wang, B. Y.; Král, P. Nanodroplet activated and guided folding of graphene nanostructures Nano Lett. 2009, 9, 3766 3771 DOI: 10.1021/nl9019616
    59. 59
      Gong, Z.; Shen, H. Y.; Zhu, W. L.; Luo, X. M.; Chen, K. X.; Jiang, H. L. A computational study on electron transfer mechanism between alkaline earth metal atoms and cyclooctatetraene to form cation-π bonded complexes Chem. Phys. Lett. 2006, 423, 339 343 DOI: 10.1016/j.cplett.2006.03.096
    60. 60
      Zhu, W. L.; Luo, X. M.; Puah, C. M.; Tan, X. J.; Shen, J. H.; Gu, J. D.; Chen, K. X.; Jiang, H. L. The multiplicity, strength, and nature of the interaction of nucleobases with alkaline and alkaline earth metal cations: A density functional theory investigation J. Phys. Chem. A 2004, 108, 4008 4018 DOI: 10.1021/jp036911n
    61. 61
      Kumpf, R. A.; Dougherty, D. A. A mechanism for ion selectivity in potassium channels: Computational studies of cation-π interactions Science 1993, 261, 1708 1710 DOI: 10.1126/science.8378771
    62. 62
      Reddy, A. S.; Vijay, D.; Sastry, G. M.; Sastry, G. N. From subtle to substantial: Role of metal ions on π-π interactions J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 2479 2481 DOI: 10.1021/jp060018h
    63. 63
      Duan, M. Y.; Song, B.; Shi, G. S.; Li, H. K.; Ji, G. F.; Hu, J.; Chen, X. G.; Fang, H. P. Cation × 3π: Cooperative interaction of a cation and three benzenes with an anomalous order in binding energy J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 12104 12109 DOI: 10.1021/ja302918t
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information


    The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.6b04235.

    • Material and methods, surface zeta potential (Figure S1), aggregation kinetics of GO (Figure S2), FT-IR spectra of GO and GO aggregate induced by different cations (Figure S3), and TEM images of GO (Figures S4 and S5) (PDF)


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.